Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Annals of African Medicine logoLink to Annals of African Medicine
. 2026 Aug 10;25(6):1464–1472. doi: 10.4103/aam.aam_455_26

Objective Evidence for Mind–body Interventions: Selective Modulation of Meridian-wise Bioelectrical Conductance by Yogic Practices

Rekha Jiwane 1, Varun Malhotra 1,✉, Santosh Wakode 1, Naina Bhargava 1, Jyoti Keswani 1, Danish Javed 2, Francisco J Cidral-Filho 3, Patrick Porter 4, Gaurav Chanderprakash Mittal 5
PMCID: PMC13645300  PMID: 42566281

Abstract

Introduction:

Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) describes meridians as channels through which vital energy (Qi) flows, with disturbances in this flow associated with disease. Contemporary research has demonstrated that classical meridian points possess distinctive electrical properties that vary with autonomic and metabolic states. This study investigated the effects of different yogic practices, meditation, and exercise on meridian energy measured through electrical conductance at classical acupuncture points.

Materials and Methods:

Healthy adults participated in various intervention groups (n = 14–30 per intervention). Meridian energy was assessed by measuring electrical conductance at the 12 classical meridian acupoints before and immediately after interventions including Kriya Yoga, Bhramari Pranayama, Anulom Vilom, Chandra Nadi, Surya Nadi, cooling pranayamas (Shitali, Seetkari, Ujjayi), Kapalbhati, and exercise. Pre- and post-intervention meridian energy values were compared using appropriate statistical analyses.

Results:

Slow meditative practices produced marked increases in meridian energy across all meridians. Kriya Yoga (n = 30) and Bhramari Pranayama (n = 14) significantly increased mean meridian energy from approximately 45–50 to 90–99 units (P < 0.0001), indicating widespread parasympathetic activation. Anulom Vilom (n = 30) produced balanced increases across all meridians (P < 0.0001), whereas Chandra Nadi (n = 20) preferentially enhanced Kidney, Lung, and Bladder meridians, and Surya Nadi (n = 20) predominantly increased Stomach, Spleen, and Liver meridians. Cooling pranayamas achieved near-maximal meridian energy (~99 units), particularly in the Liver, Gallbladder, and Lung meridians. In contrast, exercise (n = 30) and Kapalbhati (n = 30) significantly reduced meridian energy (P < 0.01), with the greatest reductions observed in the Heart and Small Intestine meridians.

Discussion:

The observed changes suggest that different yogic practices exert distinct physiological effects on meridian energy that parallel shifts in autonomic nervous system activity. Meditative and slow breathing techniques enhanced meridian conductance, consistent with parasympathetic predominance, whereas vigorous exercise and Kapalbhati reduced meridian energy, reflecting sympathetic activation. These findings provide physiological support for the TCM concept of dynamic meridian regulation and establish a potential link between meridian bioelectrical activity and autonomic function.

Conclusion:

Yogic practices produce characteristic and measurable alterations in meridian energy, with the direction and magnitude of change depending on the type of practice. Electrical meridian mapping may serve as a rapid, non-invasive biomarker of mind–body interventions, offering potential applications in personalized stress management, autonomic assessment, and metabolic health.

Keywords: Bioelectrical conductance, meridian energy, yogic practices

INTRODUCTION

Traditional systems of medicine, particularly Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM), describe the human body as an integrated energetic network governed by meridians through which vital energy (Qi) circulates. According to the classical theory, balanced meridian activity sustains health, whereas disturbances precede dysfunction. Although historically regarded as metaphysical, contemporary research has sought biophysical correlates, identifying meridians as pathways with distinct anatomical, hydraulic, and electrical properties.[,2,3] Modern investigations confirm that acupuncture points possess unique electrical characteristics that are dynamic and responsive to physiological states. Critically, the electrical potential at acupoints can shift with autonomic and metabolic conditions, suggesting meridian activity may reflect underlying neuro-autonomic regulation.[4,5] This supports the hypothesis that meridian measurements represent functional physiological processes. Preliminary studies have applied this model to mind–body practices, showing yoga can modulate meridian electrical conductance, suggesting a regulatory benefit.

Mind–body interventions such as yogic breathing (pranayama) and meditation are well documented to influence autonomic nervous system balance.[,7,8] Slow, rhythmic techniques are associated with enhanced parasympathetic activity, as evidenced by heart rate variability and baroreflex studies. However, a detailed, practice-specific analysis of the immediate impact of these interventions on meridian-wise energy distribution remains limited.[9] Building on work linking meridian activity to visceral function and systemic regulation,[10,11] we hypothesize that meridian energy mapping can provide a real-time, systemic readout of autonomic shifts.[12,13] Therefore, this study aimed to quantitatively evaluate immediate changes in meridian-wise bioelectrical profiles during a spectrum of yogic techniques and exercise.[14,15] We hypothesized that slow, meditative practices would induce a global increase in meridian energy (parasympathetic), while vigorous activities would produce suppressive effects (sympathetic).

METHODS

Study design and participants

This observational and experimental study assessed meridian-wise energy changes in healthy adult participants during selected yogic practices, meditation techniques, and physical exercise. Sample sizes varied by intervention, ranging from 14 to 30 participants per practice.

This study was conducted after receiving ethical approval from the Institutional Human Ethics Committee of the All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, India (Memo No.: IHEC-LOP/2018/IM0179; dated February 26, 2018).

To ensure stable baseline measurements, participants were allotted a minimum of 10 min of seated rest upon arrival and wore comfortable clothing. Recordings were conducted in a silent environment with ambient temperature maintained within a thermoneutral zone. Bioelectrical measurements of the meridian system were acquired using the NeuralChek system (BrainTap® Inc., New Bern, NC; Dinamika, Dinamica S.r.l., Messina, Italy), a digital analyzer of bioenergetic and neurodynamic parameters. This system’s hardware and software conform to established standards for the measurement, interpretation, and clinical application of heart rate variability indices, as defined by the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology. It provides real-time functional monitoring by analyzing the heartbeat from a single-channel electrocardiogram (ECG). For measurement, two electrodes were placed on the participant’s wrists using the conductive gel. A 5-min baseline ECG recording was first obtained while the participant sat quietly. This was immediately followed by a second 5-min recording captured while the participant performed the designated yogic practice. The system’s proprietary algorithm derives a normalized “meridian energy” value (0–100 scale) for each of the 12 classical meridians from the ECG data.

Interventions

The following practices were evaluated

  • Meditative and integrative practices: Kriya Yoga, Bhramari Pranayama

  • Nadi-based breathing techniques: Anulom Vilom, Chandra Nadi, Surya Nadi

  • Cooling and regulated pranayama: Shitali, Seetkari, Ujjayi

  • Forceful breathing and physical activity: Kapalbhati breathing, Physical exercise.

Meridian energy measurement

Meridian energy was assessed using a quantitative electrodermal measurement system that records electrical conductance at standardized acupuncture meridian points corresponding to the 12 classical meridians: Lung, large intestine, stomach, spleen–pancreas, heart, small intestine, bladder, kidney, pericardium, triple heater, gallbladder, and liver.

Measurements were recorded at baseline (pre-intervention) and during each intervention. Values were expressed in standardized units (0–100 scale), with higher values indicating greater electrical conductance and functional activation.

Statistical analysis

Pre- and during-intervention, meridian values were compared using Paired t-tests. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05, with highly significant findings reported at P < 0.0001.

RESULTS

Meditative and integrative yogic practices

Kriya yoga

During Kriya Yoga (n = 30), a highly significant increase (P < 0.0001) was observed across all 12 meridians. Mean meridian values increased from baseline levels of approximately 45–50 units to 90–99 units during practice. This uniform elevation indicates a global enhancement and harmonization of meridian activity involving respiratory, cardiovascular, metabolic, and regulatory systems [Table 1].

Table 1.

Meridian-wise comparison of (pre vs. during) Kriya Yoga (n=30)

Meridian Mean (pre) SD (pre) Mean (during) SD (during) P Cohen’s d
Lung 47.10 11.51 97.40 5.80 <0.0001 5.52
Large intestine 47.47 9.65 97.80 5.51 <0.0001 6.41
Stomach 46.90 10.44 98.73 3.27 <0.0001 6.70
Spleen and pancreas 45.97 9.87 98.07 4.26 <0.0001 6.85
Heart 49.43 17.04 90.67 15.61 <0.0001 2.52
Small intestine 46.63 12.54 87.40 11.45 <0.0001 3.40
Bladder 49.03 13.11 94.87 9.49 <0.0001 4.01
Kidney 45.33 12.54 99.20 2.62 <0.0001 5.95
Pericardium 45.77 13.37 97.77 7.98 <0.0001 4.72
Triple heater 48.53 11.88 97.37 5.06 <0.0001 5.35
Gallbladder 49.43 10.58 96.57 8.89 <0.0001 4.82
Liver 47.07 11.68 98.17 4.19 <0.0001 5.82
Open in a new tab

SD=Standard deviation

Bhramari pranayama

Bhramari Pranayama (n = 14) produced marked increases across all meridians, with particularly prominent elevations in lung, heart, liver, and kidney meridians. The organ-wise effects of the various kriya and pranayama practices are illustrated in Figure 1. These changes suggest enhanced respiratory–autonomic coupling and strong parasympathetic engagement [Table 2].

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Radar plots showing organ-wise effects of different kriya and pranayama practices on meridian energy levels

Table 2.

Meridian-wise comparison of (pre vs. during) Bhramari pranayama (n=14)

Meridian Mean (pre) SD (pre) Mean (during) SD (during) P Cohen’s d
Lung 51.21 13.43 99.00 2.32 <0.0001 4.98
Large intestine 49.57 13.28 90.07 8.01 <0.0001 3.71
Stomach 51.29 13.57 95.00 6.97 <0.0001 4.07
Spleen and pancreas 47.21 10.05 96.00 7.69 <0.0001 5.46
Heart 46.69 9.12 97.00 6.48 <0.0001 6.36
Small intestine 46.15 10.65 95.92 5.51 <0.0001 5.90
Bladder 48.57 9.90 96.79 5.35 <0.0001 6.05
Kidney 48.50 10.97 98.14 3.03 <0.0001 6.20
Pericardium 40.93 12.98 94.50 8.16 <0.0001 4.95
Triple heater 48.43 10.89 84.79 9.49 <0.0001 3.56
Gallbladder 53.29 11.17 95.36 6.56 <0.0001 4.61
Liver 49.21 12.10 99.50 0.94 <0.0001 5.86
Open in a new tab

SD=Standard deviation

Nadi-based breathing techniques

Anulom vilom pranayama

Anulom Vilom (n = 30) resulted in moderate yet statistically significant increases (P < 0.0001) across all the meridians. Relative to other practices, activation of the heart and small intestine meridians was comparatively lower, indicating gentle autonomic regulation without excessive stimulation [Table 3].

Table 3.

Meridian-wise comparison of (pre vs. during) Anulom Vilom Pranayam (n=30)

Meridian Mean (pre) SD (pre) Mean (during) SD (during) P Cohen’s d
Lung 38.40 12.93 80.70 15.15 <0.0001 3.00
Large intestine 39.15 12.85 81.75 13.11 <0.0001 3.28
Stomach 39.16 13.96 78.21 14.12 <0.0001 2.78
Spleen and pancreas 36.30 12.66 78.85 15.65 <0.0001 2.99
Heart 36.25 19.24 60.25 22.41 <0.0004 1.15
Small intestine 35.35 12.66 65.70 11.81 <0.0001 2.48
Bladder 36.90 13.37 77.20 13.96 <0.0001 2.95
Kidney 38.35 18.55 85.40 17.32 <0.0001 2.62
Pericardium 37.55 14.04 82.95 16.17 <0.0001 3.00
Triple heater 38.26 15.79 84.47 15.06 <0.0001 3.00
Gallbladder 42.05 15.63 84.79 12.47 <0.0001 3.02
Liver 37.16 13.83 78.95 13.91 <0.0001 3.01
Open in a new tab

SD=Standard deviation

Chandra Nadi Pranayama

Chandra Nadi (n = 20) demonstrated uniform and near-maximal activation across meridians, with particularly high values in the kidney, lung, and bladder meridians. This pattern reflects dominant parasympathetic activation and aligns with traditional descriptions of lunar, cooling energy pathways [Table 4].

Table 4.

Meridian-wise comparison of (pre vs. during) Chandra Nadi Pranayama (n=20)

Meridian Mean (pre) SD (pre) Mean (during) SD (during) P Cohen’s d
Lung 47.55 14.20 98.00 4.04 <0.0001 4.83
Large intestine 44.90 17.73 96.45 5.94 <0.0001 3.90
Stomach 48.25 14.66 95.90 6.43 <0.0001 4.21
Spleen and pancreas 45.65 13.12 97.15 4.07 <0.0001 5.30
Heart 41.50 16.94 91.95 11.27 <0.0001 3.51
Small intestine 40.05 15.39 91.40 7.67 <0.0001 4.22
Bladder 45.90 16.44 98.10 5.07 <0.0001 4.29
Kidney 49.30 16.51 99.35 2.30 <0.0001 4.25
Pericardium 48.50 15.43 95.10 8.51 <0.0001 3.74
Triple heater 49.25 14.69 95.00 8.35 <0.0001 3.83
Gallbladder 49.85 18.47 97.55 4.02 <0.0001 3.57
Liver 43.60 13.45 94.95 7.15 <0.0001 4.77
Open in a new tab

SD=Standard deviation

Surya Nadi Pranayama

Surya Nadi (n = 20) showed significant increases across all meridians, with comparatively higher stimulation of the stomach, spleen–pancreas, and liver meridians. These findings suggest enhanced digestive and metabolic activation consistent with sympathetic arousal [Table 5].

Table 5.

Meridian-wise comparison of (pre vs. during) Surya Nadi Pranayama (n=20)

Meridian Mean (pre) SD (pre) Mean (during) SD (during) P Cohen’s d
Lung 57.84 15.83 95.53 8.02 <0.0001 3.00
Large intestine 60.25 14.25 98.40 4.06 <0.0001 3.64
Stomach 57.50 12.88 96.40 7.10 <0.0001 3.74
Spleen and pancreas 59.05 15.21 97.05 5.63 <0.0001 3.31
Heart 59.05 19.47 87.60 13.07 <0.0001 1.72
Small intestine 57.85 11.60 86.90 9.09 <0.0001 2.79
Bladder 61.55 13.36 97.65 4.67 <0.0001 3.61
Kidney 61.1 19.73 99.55 1.39 <0.0001 2.75
Pericardium 60.00 16.75 96.85 7.43 <0.0001 2.84
Triple heater 58.45 14.67 94.55 5.96 <0.0001 3.22
Gallbladder 61.10 16.47 96.45 7.11 <0.0001 2.79
Liver 56.10 14.64 96.75 5.67 <0.0001 3.66
Open in a new tab

SD=Standard deviation

Exercise and forceful breathing techniques

Physical exercise

In contrast to meditative practices, physical exercise (n = 30) produced a significant reduction in meridian energy across all the meridians (P < 0.01). The most pronounced decreases were observed in the heart and small intestine meridians [Table 6].

Table 6.

Meridian-wise comparison of (pre vs. during) physical exercise (n=30)

Meridian Mean (pre) SD (pre) Mean (during) SD (during) P Cohen’s d
Lung 51.07 14.14 38.57 15.24 0.0001 −0.85
Large intestine 46.75 14.96 38.26 15.66 0.0001 −0.55
Stomach 47.70 12.26 39.07 15.10 0.0001 −0.63
Spleen and pancreas 49.82 14.85 38.44 15.53 0.0001 −0.75
Heart 44.37 15.57 29.37 15.75 0.0001 −0.96
Small intestine 46.38 15.13 38.40 15.42 0.0001 −0.52
Bladder 50.93 16.00 41.93 16.98 0.0001 −0.55
Kidney 48.13 17.14 41.47 18.34 0.0100 −0.38
Pericardium 50.20 15.25 39.05 16.70 0.0001 −0.70
Triple heater 51.54 15.00 40.58 16.50 0.0001 −0.70
Gallbladder 52.14 16.44 39.75 15.99 0.0001 −0.76
Liver 49.20 14.02 39.20 16.91 0.0001 −0.65
Open in a new tab

SD=Standard deviation

Kapalbhati breathing

Kapalbhati breathing (n = 30) similarly resulted in reductions across several meridians, with notable decreases in heart and small intestine meridians. Changes in the kidney and pericardium meridians were not statistically significant. The distribution of meridian energy changes following Kapalbhati practice is shown in Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Violin plot illustrating organ-wise effect of mean meridian energy following Kapalbhati practice

Techniques with negative effect sizes (energy decreases)

Unlike the pranayama techniques above, Exercise and Kapalbhati resulted in a decrease in mean meridian energy levels, reflected by negative Cohen’s d values [Table 7].

Table 7.

Meridian-wise comparison of (pre vs. during) Kapalbhati breathing (n=30)

Meridian Mean (pre) SD (pre) Mean (during) SD (during) P Cohen’s d
Lung 43.75 16.72 34.40 11.87 0.0168 −0.64
Large intestine 47.65 18.13 35.90 15.09 0.0127 −0.70
Stomach 47.21 18.98 34.42 9.56 0.0048 −0.85
Spleen and pancreas 46.10 19.17 35.65 13.36 0.0294 −0.63
Heart 41.05 20.35 11.00 7.89 0.0001 −1.94
Small intestine 41.50 15.65 22.05 11.81 0.0001 −1.40
Bladder 45.60 19.79 29.35 11.91 0.0014 −0.99
Kidney 44.05 25.21 39.50 14.58 0.3251 −0.22
Pericardium 44.00 24.10 42.15 15.53 0.6861 −0.09
Triple heater 48.05 21.27 39.05 14.55 0.0205 −0.49
Gallbladder 46.40 18.25 39.75 12.49 0.0967 −0.42
Liver 42.35 19.52 32.95 12.67 0.0231 −0.57
Open in a new tab

SD=Standard deviation

  • Exercise: Produced moderate to large negative effects across all meridians (ranging from − 0.38 in Kidney to −0.96 in heart)

  • Kapalbhati: Produced the most significant decrease in the heart (−1.94) and small intestine (−1.40) meridians. Notably, the changes in the kidney (d = −0.22, P = 0.3251) and pericardium (d = −0.09, P = 0.6861) were not statistically significant.

  • A comparative representation of exercise and Kapalbhati effects across meridians is presented in Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Bar graph showing the comparative effects of exercise and Kapalbhati on meridian energy levels across different organs

Cooling and regulated pranayama techniques

Shitali, Seetkari, and Ujjayi pranayama resulted in robust activation of meridian energy. Detailed meridian-wise results for these techniques are presented in Table 8. Among these, Seetkari consistently produced the highest meridian values, frequently approaching near-ceiling levels (~99 units). Cooling pranayama preferentially enhanced liver, gallbladder, and lung meridians, suggesting strong thermoregulatory and parasympathetic effects.

Table 8.

Meridian-wise comparison of (pre vs. during) cooling pranayama (Shitali and Seetkari) and Ujjayi Pranayama (n=30)

Meridian Mean (pre) SD (pre) Mean (during) SD (during) P
Gallbladder Shitali 53.5606 19.0771 97.2735 4.7580 0.0001
Gallbladder Seetkari 53.5606 19.0771 99.2000 1.7045 0.0001
Gallbladder Ujjayi 53.5606 19.0771 91.7640 12.4289 0.0001
Liver Shitali 49.7895 24.0713 97.6000 6.8195 0.0001
Liver Seetkari 49.7895 24.0713 99.8500 0.3663 0.0001
Liver Ujjayi 49.7895 24.0713 93.4115 10.8824 0.0001
Lung Shitali 48.8420 16.0337 95.0675 8.6722 0.0001
Lung Seetkari 48.8420 16.0337 96.7000 7.4063 0.0001
Lung Ujjayi 48.8420 16.0337 88.4705 12.8026 0.0001
Large Intestine Shitali 48.5265 20.4022 96.2000 7.3068 0.0001
Large Intestine Seetkari 48.5265 20.4022 94.1500 8.9400 0.0001
Large Intestine Ujjayi 48.5265 20.4022 90.1180 14.5272 0.0001
Stomach Shitali 53.6315 18.0561 96.7325 8.0228 0.0001
Stomach Seetkari 53.6315 18.0561 98.9000 2.5319 0.0001
Stomach Ujjayi 53.6315 18.0561 91.1770 12.3937 0.0001
Spleen and Pancreas Shitali 48.0000 18.7925 94.9325 11.8387 0.0001
Spleen and Pancreas Seetkari 48.0000 18.7925 96.85 4.98 0.0001
Spleen and Pancreas Ujjayi 48.0000 18.7925 88.7065 14.3958 0.0001
Heart Shitali 49.8420 16.4357 96.0000 10.4075 0.0001
Heart Seetkari 49.8420 16.4357 98.0500 5.2663 0.0001
Heart Ujjayi 49.8420 16.4357 87.4115 13.0507 0.0001
Small Intestine Shitali 48.4210 15.2844 96.4000 8.1873 0.0001
Small Intestine Seetkari 48.4210 15.2844 98.0500 4.3707 0.0001
Small Intestine Ujjayi 48.4210 15.2844 88.0000 14.8678 0.0001
Bladder Shitali 46.4735 14.9362 95.7370 8.2834 0.0001
Bladder Seetkari 46.4735 14.9362 98.2500 2.9890 0.0001
Bladder Ujjayi 46.4735 14.9362 88.4705 13.0389 0.0001
Kidney Shitali 48.4210 16.8720 96.5325 6.8585 0.0001
Kidney Seetkari 48.4210 16.8720 98.3000 3.3733 0.0001
Kidney Ujjayi 48.4210 16.8720 87.8820 12.8140 0.0001
Pericardium Shitali 46.3685 21.3004 89.6675 18.8587 0.0001
Pericardium Seetkari 46.3685 21.3004 91.3636 11.9103 0.0001
Pericardium Ujjayi 46.3685 21.3004 86.4705 16.1542 0.0001
Triple Heater Shitali 48.1055 19.6573 90.2220 15.0562 0.0001
Triple Heater Seetkari 48.1055 19.6573 90.7000 8.6457 0.0001
Triple Heater Ujjayi 48.1055 19.6573 81.4115 15.4377 0.0001
Open in a new tab

SD=Standard deviation

Summary

  1. Potency of Kriya and Bhramari: Kriya and Bhramari Pranayama demonstrate the highest overall effect sizes Kriya has the most profound impact on the Spleen and Pancreas (d = 6.85) and stomach (d = 6.70) meridians, while Bhramari shows its strongest effects on the heart (d = 6.36) and kidney (d = 6.20) meridians

  2. Uniformity of positive change: All tested pranayama techniques (except Kapalbhati) resulted in “Huge” effect sizes (generally d > 2.0), indicating a massive and statistically significant increase in meridian energy levels compared to baseline

  3. Specific versus balanced impacts:

    • Seetkari and Shitali show particularly high impacts on the Bladder and Small Intestine meridians

    • Anulom Vilom and Surya Nadi provide a more moderate but very consistent increase across all parameters, though they show the least relative impact on the heart.

  4. Pranayama versus physical exercise: A major distinction is observed between “cooling/balancing” pranayamas and physical activity. While most pranayamas significantly increase in recorded meridian energy, both exercise and Kapalbhati (often considered a more vigorous, cleansing kriya) lead to a reduction in these energy levels immediately during the activity

  5. Statistical significance: With very few exceptions (specifically in Kapalbhati), all changes across all meridians for all techniques reached a high level of statistical significance (P < 0.0001).

The analysis of effect sizes reveals several key findings. The comparative effect sizes for Shitali, Seetkari, and Ujjayi pranayama across meridians are summarized in Table 9. First, Kriya and Bhramari Pranayama are the most potent interventions, with Kriya showing the most profound impact on the spleen and pancreas (d = 6.85) and stomach (d = 6.70) meridians, while Bhramari exerts its strongest effects on the heart (d = 6.36) and kidney (d = 6.20) meridians. Second, a uniformity of positive change is evident, as all tested pranayama techniques, except for Kapalbhati, resulted in “Huge” effect sizes (generally d > 2.0), indicating a massive and statistically significant increase in the meridian energy from baseline. Third, the impacts vary between specific and balanced: cooling techniques such as Seetkari and Shitali show particularly high impacts on the bladder and small intestine meridians, whereas Anulom Vilom and Surya Nadi provide a more moderate but consistently increase across all the parameters, with the least relative impact on the heart. A major distinction is observed in the fourth finding, contrasting pranayama with physical exercise; while most pranayamas significantly increase meridian energy, both physical exercise and the vigorous technique Kapalbhati lead to an immediate reduction in these levels. Finally, the results are robust, with nearly all changes across all meridians and techniques reaching a high level of statistical significance (P < 0.0001), with few exceptions specifically in Kapalbhati.

Table 9.

Mean duration of different pranayama techniques across meridians

Meridian Shitali (d) Seetkari (d) Ujjayi (d)
Gallbladder 3.11 3.37 2.37
Liver 2.70 2.94 2.34
Lung 3.59 3.83 2.73
Large intestine 3.11 2.90 2.35
Stomach 3.08 3.51 2.42
Spleen and pancreas 2.99 3.55 2.43
Heart 3.36 3.95 2.53
Small intestine 3.91 4.42 2.62
Bladder 4.08 4.81 2.99
Kidney 3.74 4.10 2.63
Pericardium 2.15 2.61 2.12
Triple heater 2.41 2.81 1.88
Open in a new tab

DISCUSSION

This study demonstrates that specific yogic practices rapidly and selectively modulate bioelectrical activity along TCM meridians.[14] The patterns observed – global elevation during slow practices and reduction during sympathetic-dominant activities – provide a quantitative bridge between traditional energetic models and modern physiology.[,16,17,18] The findings substantiate the view of meridians as a measurable, dynamic physiological interface rather than a purely metaphysical construct.[19,20] The immediate shifts in electrical conductance align with research identifying meridians as pathways with unique biophysical and electrical properties and specific anatomical correlates.[16,19,20] The coherent response to autonomic manipulations supports the theory that meridian activity reflects integrated visceral and autonomic function, moving the meridian system toward a plausible functional network as highlighted in recent interdisciplinary reviews and bibliometric syntheses.

The dramatic increase in meridian energy during Kriya Yoga and Bhramari Pranayama extends previous work showing yoga’s regulatory effect on meridian conductance and organism-level regulation. The near-maximum values suggest a state of high bioelectrical coherence, likely underpinning the profound calm reported, and this aligns with established parasympathetic outcomes of slow, regulated breathing practices measured via HRV and baroreflex sensitivity.[15,18,19,20]

Conversely, the suppressive effect of exercise and Kapalbhati Pranayama provides a clear energetic correlate to sympathetic stimulation, echoing prior observations during high-frequency breathing and other arousing practices. The nuanced patterns from nadi-specific breathing (Chandra vs. Surya) are particularly compelling: Chandra Nadi’s peak activation of kidney and lung meridians parallels the reports of left-nostril breathing improving cardiovascular parameters in hypertensive patients, while Surya Nadi’s relative emphasis on stomach/spleen and liver meridians resonates with TCM elemental associations discussed in modern meridian overviews. This practice-specific fingerprint suggests meridian mapping could be a precise tool for tailoring interventions. For example, cooling pranayama like Seetkari or Sheetali, which strongly activated liver and gallbladder meridians in this study, may be specifically indicated for conditions characterized by liver fire in TCM, in line with their documented cardiac autonomic effects in hypertension.

Limitations and future directions

The study’s observational design and varied sample sizes across interventions necessitate cautious interpretation.[12,14,17] Future research should directly correlate meridian maps with simultaneous HRV and Baroreflex indices to further validate this system as a biomarker, building on foundational links suggested between acupoint electrical potential, autonomic regulation, and functional state. Extending these measures to clinical populations with known dysautonomia or organ-specific pathology will be crucial, especially in light of emerging interdisciplinary evidence on meridians, acupoints, and their systemic relevance.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, meridian-wise bioelectrical measurement is a sensitive biomarker for the autonomic effects of mind-body practices. By showing distinct and physiologically coherent meridian activation patterns, this work provides a scientific framework for understanding traditional energetic concepts, positioning meridian mapping as a promising tool for objective assessment and personalized therapeutic protocols in integrative health.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

Funding Statement

Nil.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Ahn AC, Colbert AP, Anderson BJ, Martinsen OG, Hammerschlag R, Cina S, et al. Electrical properties of acupuncture points and meridians: A systematic review. Bioelectromagnetics. 2008;29:245–56. doi: 10.1002/bem.20403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Li J, Wang Q, Liang H, Dong H, Li Y, Ng EH, et al. Biophysical characteristics of meridians and acupoints: A systematic review. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2012. 2012:793841. doi: 10.1155/2012/793841. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Maurer N, Nissel H, Egerbacher M, Gornik E, Schuller P, Traxler H. Anatomical evidence of acupuncture meridians in the human extracellular matrix: Results from a macroscopic and microscopic interdisciplinary multicentre study on human corpses. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2019. 2019:1–8. doi: 10.1155/2019/6976892. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Matos LC, Lopes LT, Freire VA, Machado JP, Monteiro FJ, Greten HJ. Can the electrical potential of acupoints be used to assess the functional state of meridians and the effects of therapeutics? An exploratory data analysis. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2021;26:309–17. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2020.12.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Qi W, He B, Gu Q, Li Y, Liang F. Scientific exploration and hypotheses concerning the meridian system in traditional Chinese medicine. Acupunct Herb Med. 2024;4:283–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Sharma B, Hankey A, Nagilla N, Meenakshy KB, Nagendra HR. Can yoga practices benefit health by improving organism regulation? Evidence from electrodermal measures of acupuncture meridians. Int J Yoga. 2014;7:32–40. doi: 10.4103/0973-6131.123477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Nagilla N, Hankey A, Nagendra H. Effects of yoga practice on acumeridian energies: Variance reduction implies benefits for regulation. Int J Yoga. 2013;6:61–5. doi: 10.4103/0973-6131.105948. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kuppusamy M, Kamaldeen D, Pitani R, Amaldas J, Ramasamy P, Shanmugam P, et al. Effects of yoga breathing practice on heart rate variability in healthy adolescents: A randomized controlled trial. Integr Med Res. 2020;9:28–32. doi: 10.1016/j.imr.2020.01.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Thanalakshmi J, Maheshkumar K, Kannan R, Sundareswaran L, Venugopal V, Poonguzhali S. Effect of Sheetali pranayama on cardiac autonomic function among patients with primary hypertension-a randomized controlled trial. Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2020;39:101138. doi: 10.1016/j.ctcp.2020.101138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Cheng YP, Guo Y, Wang C, Wu BQ, Xia Q, Zhang RC, et al. Research progress on the characteristics and essence of meridians and acupoints from an interdisciplinary perspective: A review. J Integr Med. 2026;24:33–48. doi: 10.1016/j.joim.2025.09.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Zhang WB, Wang GJ, Fuxe K. Classic and modern meridian studies: A review of low hydraulic resistance channels along meridians and their relevance for therapeutic effects in traditional Chinese medicine. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2015. 2015:410979. doi: 10.1155/2015/410979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Bhavanani AB, Madanmohan, Sanjay Z. Immediate effect of Chandra Nadi pranayama (left unilateral forced nostril breathing) on cardiovascular parameters in hypertensive patients. Int J Yoga. 2012;5:108–11. doi: 10.4103/0973-6131.98221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Bernardi L, Gabutti A, Porta C, Spicuzza L. Slow breathing reduces chemoreflex response to hypoxia and hypercapnia, and increases baroreflex sensitivity. J Hypertens. 2001;19:2221–9. doi: 10.1097/00004872-200112000-00016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ghosh K, Hankey A, Srinivasan TM. Effect of lotus posture on acupuncture meridian energies: A controlled trial. Int J Yoga. 2017;10:88–94. doi: 10.4103/0973-6131.205511. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Sharma S, Kaushik D, Saini S, Sharma H, Metri K. Effect of yogabased interventions on heart rate variability and anxiety among students: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Neurosci. 2025;32:1–12. doi: 10.1177/09727531251394924. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kwon CY. A bibliometric analysis of studies on meridians. Perspect Integr Med. 2025;4:67–75. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Telles S, Singh N, Balkrishna A. Heart rate variability changes during high frequency yoga breathing and breath awareness. Biopsychosoc Med. 2011;5:4. doi: 10.1186/1751-0759-5-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Anasuya B, Deepak KK, Jaryal AK, Narang R. Effect of slow breathing on autonomic tone and baroreflex sensitivity in yoga practitioners. Indian J Med Res. 2020;152:638–47. doi: 10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_559_19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Tyagi A, Cohen M. Yoga and heart rate variability: A comprehensive review of the literature. Int J Yoga. 2016;9:97–113. doi: 10.4103/0973-6131.183712. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Wang GJ, Ayati MH, Zhang WB. Meridian studies in China: A systematic review. J Acupunct Meridian Stud. 2010;3:1–9. doi: 10.1016/S2005-2901(10)60001-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Annals of African Medicine are provided here courtesy of Wolters Kluwer -- Medknow Publications

RESOURCES