ABSTRACT
Systemic arterial hypertension (SAH) remains a leading global cause of premature death, significantly increasing the risk of cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, and renal diseases. While non‐modifiable factors, such as age and genetics, contribute to its development, lifestyle changes are crucial for prevention and management. Dietary modifications, such as reducing sodium intake, increasing potassium, and adopting a diet rich in fruits and vegetables, combined with regular physical activity, weight management, smoking cessation, and reduced alcohol intake are effective strategies for lowering blood pressure. Recent research has increasingly focused on bioactive compounds with antioxidant and anti‐inflammatory properties for the management of SAH. Substances such as polyphenols, curcumin, and other plant‐derived compounds, as well as live microorganisms such as probiotics, are being actively studied for their potential to improve endothelial function, modulate nitric oxide production, and reduce oxidative stress. This narrative review summarizes the current evidence on dietary interventions and bioactive compounds as complementary approaches to traditional treatments, examining their mechanisms of action.
Keywords: bioactive compounds, dietary patterns, hypertension, inflammation, oxidative stress
Polyphenols target oxidative stress and inflammation, improving endothelial function and reducing blood pressure in systemic arterial hypertension. Created by BioRender.com.

1. Introduction
According to the World Health Organization (WHO), the global prevalence of systemic arterial hypertension (SAH) has increased significantly, rising from 650 million cases in 1990 to 1.13 billion in 2019. Current estimates suggest that 1.28 billion adults aged 30–79 years globally are affected by hypertension [1]. The burden of hypertension is exceptionally high in low and middle‐income countries, where access to diagnosis and treatment is limited, highlighting the need for cost‐effective dietary strategies [1]. SAH is characterized by persistently elevated blood pressure (BP) (≥140 mmHg systolic or ≥ 90 mmHg diastolic) [2]. Recently, in 2024, the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) introduced a new BP category called "Elevated BP," defined as systolic BP (SBP) between 120 and 139 mmHg or diastolic BP (DBP) between 70 and 89 mmHg [2]. Hypertension causes target organ damage, increases the risk of cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, and renal diseases [3, 4], and remains one of the leading causes of premature death worldwide [1].
Although advanced age and genetic predisposition are non‐modifiable risk factors, lifestyle choices play a significant role in the development of hypertension. Major modifiable contributors include overweight and obesity, high sodium intake, excessive consumption of saturated and trans fats, insufficient fruit and vegetable intake, physical inactivity, smoking, and excessive alcohol consumption [5]. Given these modifiable factors, lifestyle interventions, such as adopting a healthy diet rich in fruits and vegetables, reducing salt intake with low‐sodium and high‐potassium salt, engaging in regular physical activity, losing weight, quitting smoking, and limiting alcohol intake, are effective strategies to lower blood pressure [4, 6, 7, 8].
High sodium consumption is a well‐established contributor to hypertension, primarily due to its impact on fluid retention and vascular resistance. Conversely, increasing dietary potassium intake has been shown to counteract sodium's effects, supporting vascular relaxation and reducing BP [2]. Moderate reductions in sodium intake, along with increased potassium intake, can result in significant BP decrease [9]. Well‐established dietary patterns such as the DASH (Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension) and Mediterranean diets have shown significant benefits in lowering BP due to their focus on plant‐based foods, mono, and polyunsaturated fats, and limited sodium intake [10, 11].
Pharmacological treatments remain essential for many patients, including diuretics, angiotensin‐converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, calcium channel blockers, and beta‐blockers, which are effective in controlling BP and reducing cardiovascular risks [5]. However, in recent years, significant attention has been given to bioactive compounds with antioxidant and anti‐inflammatory properties due to their potential in controlling hypertension [12]. Live microorganisms, such as probiotics, polyphenols, curcumin, and other plant‐derived substances, are being actively studied for their ability to enhance endothelial function, modulate nitric oxide (NO) production, and reduce oxidative stress [13, 14, 15]. These emerging treatments highlight a complementary approach, combining conventional therapies with nutraceuticals to achieve better blood pressure regulation and overall cardiovascular health.
Taking these factors into account, this review aims to synthesize current evidence on the role of dietary interventions and bioactive compounds in the prevention and management of hypertension, offering insights into their mechanisms of action and clinical relevance.
2. Oxidative Stress and Inflammation in Hypertension
SAH is associated with several conditions who can lead to the recruitment of innate immune cells, including macrophages, dendritic cells, and NK cells. In this environment, these cells change their transcriptional profiles, resulting in the activation of genes related to chemokine receptors and cytokine production. Consequently, these cells release pro‐inflammatory cytokines that attract additional immune cells, such as T cells and B cells, to the site of inflammation. This process further amplifies inflammation as these cells differentiate into effector cells (Th1 and Th17), which produce more pro‐inflammatory cytokines [16]. Specifically, macrophages, CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, along with interleukin‐6 (IL‐6), IL‐17A, IL‐1β, and interferon (IFN)‐γ, are suggested as mediators of hypertension development and end‐organ damage [17]. Indeed, individuals with SAH exhibit increased levels of several inflammatory mediators, including C‐reactive protein (CRP), IL‐6, and tumor necrosis factor‐alpha (TNF‐α) [18, 19]. These pro‐inflammatory cytokines seem to disrupt the function of the renin‐angiotensin‐aldosterone system by increasing both systemic and local production of angiotensin II, which causes vasoconstriction, which in turn promotes resistance to blood flow and ultimately culminates in elevated peripheral blood pressure endothelial dysfunction, and arterial stiffness, as well as the formation of atheromatous plaques [20]. This process triggers a vicious cycle, where elevated BP directly damages the vascular endothelium, worsening the hypertensive state [21].
The same factors that increase inflammation (increased levels of angiotensin II, sodium, catecholamines, and altered mechanical forces in the vascular wall) also trigger the cellular production of ROS, thereby contributing to oxidative stress [22]. The overproduction of ROS affects blood pressure through several mechanisms. Firstly, ROS can directly inhibit NO activity (a pivotal signaling molecule that regulates vascular blood flow, maintains vascular tone, and preserves endothelial integrity) and indirectly promote the activation of the PI3K/Akt‐MAPK pathway, which is related to the expression of redox genes that act by inhibiting the activity of endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS), leading to endothelial dysfunction and, consequently, hypertension [23]. Additionally, under conditions of oxidative stress, NOS uncouples from its cofactor, generating harmful oxygen species that can harm vascular cells [24].
Moreover, NADPH oxidase (NOX) enzymes, considered the primary sources of ROS in the cardiovascular system, play an essential role in oxidative stress‐mediated hypertension. Specifically, NOX2 may promote BP elevation by inducing vascular dysfunction partly through paracrine signaling of vascular smooth muscle cells and activation of inflammatory pathways, including the nuclear factor‐κB (NF‐κB) pathway. Additionally, NOX5 appears to impair endothelium relaxation, and in vascular smooth muscle cells, this enzyme can induce vascular contractile responses and increase pulse pressure, favoring SAH [25]. NOX1 also appears to promote cardiac inflammation, impair endothelial relaxation, increase vascular remodeling and fibrosis, induce Angiotensin II‐mediated vascular hypertrophy, and consequently elevate BP [24].
High concentrations of ROS can also activate the nod‐like receptor pyrin domain‐containing 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome signaling pathway, a key component of the innate immune system and an important regulator of chronic inflammation. When activated, it stimulates caspase‐1, leading to the secretion of pro‐inflammatory cytokines, especially IL‐1β and IL‐18. These cytokines contribute to the polarization of T cells toward the production of excess IL‐17 and IFN‐γ. Elevated levels of these cytokines are frequently observed in individuals with hypertension and are well‐documented as favoring vascular dysfunction [17, 26]. Furthermore, in hypertension, NF‐κB is persistently overactivated in cells and tissues, and this process also stimulates the overexpression of NLRP3, leading to the consequent release of IL‐1β, which further aggravates the inflammatory environment [26]. It is essential to recognize that both oxidative stress and inflammation can mutually exacerbate each other, accelerating the progression of hypertension (Figure 1) [27].
FIGURE 1.

Inflammation and oxidative stress mediating systemic arterial hypertension. Chronic stress and metabolic disturbances promote the overproduction of ROS, including superoxide, hydrogen peroxide, and hydroxyl radicals, primarily via NADPH oxidase activation. Excess ROS interacts with NO, forming peroxynitrite, which impairs NO bioavailability and vascular relaxation. ROS also activates the NF‐κB signaling pathway in vascular and immune cells, triggering the transcription of pro‐inflammatory cytokines (e.g., IL‐1β, IL‐18) and activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome. Innate immune cells, such as macrophages and neutrophils, amplify inflammation through cytokine release and further ROS generation. These inflammatory mediators contribute to renin and angiotensinogen production, leading to RAAS activation, increased angiotensin II levels, vasoconstriction, aldosterone and vasopressin release, sodium and water retention, and elevated peripheral vascular resistance. Together, oxidative stress and inflammation drive endothelial dysfunction, ultimately contributing to the development and progression of hypertension. Abbreviations: IL, interleukin; NLRP3, Nucleotide‐binding domain, Leucine‐rich family, Pyrin‐3 domain; NF‐κB, Nuclear Factor‐κB; NO, nitric oxide; RAAS, Renin Angiotensin Aldosterone System; ROS, Reactive Oxygen Species.
The management of SAH can be divided into pharmacological and non‐pharmacological methods. Among non‐pharmacological strategies, dietary interventions play a crucial role in managing hypertension, often serving as a complementary approach to pharmacological strategy. Dietary patterns rich in fruits, vegetables, whole grains, legumes, and healthy fats, such as the DASH and Mediterranean diets, have consistently demonstrated antihypertensive effects. These benefits are primarily attributed to their high content of bioactive compounds, which possess anti‐inflammatory and antioxidant properties. Recent research has highlighted the role of specific bioactive compounds in modulating SAH progression and complications, thereby contributing to effective management of hypertension [28].
3. Nutritional Approaches
Among the most established measures, lifestyle changes stand out stand out, including recommendations for physical activity and dietary modifications [11, 29]. Meta‐analysis and clinical trials have already demonstrated a strong link between reducing salt intake, a well‐known recommendation for hypertensive patients, and lowering blood pressure [15, 30]. According to the ESC guidelines for adults with hypertension, it is recommended to limit total dietary sodium intake to approximately 2 g/day or less (equivalent to approximately 5 g, or about one teaspoon of salt per day). For the general population, a recommended sodium intake target is 2 to 4 g/day [2]. The American Heart Association (AHA) recommends that adults with high BP limit their sodium intake to no more than 1.5 g/day [31].
A meta‐analysis demonstrated that higher consumption of ultra‐processed foods (UPFs) is significantly associated with an increased risk of developing hypertension [32]. UPFs are highly palatable and typically consist of substances that contain added flavors, colorings, and other components such as additives and chemicals, as well as high levels of added sodium, sugar, and unhealthy fats, and have been associated with the development of hypertension [33]. In this context, Song et al. [34] demonstrated, in a systematic review and dose‐response meta‐analysis, an improvement in the prevention and control of hypertension resulting from the reduction of pro‐inflammatory components in the diet.
3.1. Dietary Patterns
The Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) diet, proposed in 1977 by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, aims to control the blood pressure of hypertensive patients through a dietary plan that includes food groups that have antihypertensive properties such as fruits, vegetables, whole grains, legumes, nuts, lean protein and low‐fat dairy products, in addition to reducing salt intake, added sugar and saturated fat [35, 36].
Nguyen et al. [37] demonstrated that its implementation induces a hypotensive effect accompanied by hormonal and vascular adaptations. Moreover, it has a positive influence on cardiac parameters, including reductions in end‐diastolic and systolic volumes, and promotes improvements in left ventricular function [37]. DASH diet can also stimulate the inhibition of the ACE, directly affecting the renin‐angiotensin‐aldosterone system, which causes natriuresis and diuresis, resulting in BP reduction [38, 39]. Corroborating this mechanism, it is understood that the natriuretic action of the DASH diet can also be enhanced due to the potassium and calcium content present in the diet [40, 41]. Another vital role of the DASH diet is to attenuate inflammation through the action of antioxidant compounds such as polyphenols, including flavonoids. These bioactive compounds under pathophysiological conditions have already been associated with reductions in inflammatory markers, such as high‐sensitivity CRP (hs‐CRP), which may contribute to the improvement of subclinical cardiac injury through the attenuation of high‐sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs‐cTnI) [42].
Although the DASH dietary pattern is the most studied in the world and several meta‐analyses and randomized clinical trials confirm its effects on the control of systolic and diastolic blood pressure [10, 43], a constant concern with the implementation of this pattern is to encompass cultural habits of different countries around the world and diverse ethnicities.
The Mediterranean diet (MedDiet) is based on a high consumption of antioxidant‐rich foods and anti‐inflammatory nutrients, in addition to fiber, poly‐ and monounsaturated omega‐3 fatty acids, and low levels of saturated and trans‐fats acids, as well as dietary cholesterol. As with the DASH diet, the MedDiet also recommends consuming whole grains, fish and seafood, low‐fat dairy products, poultry and eggs, fruits, vegetables, legumes, and nuts. However, the MedDiet emphasizes the incorporation of olive oil as the primary source of dietary fat and the moderate consumption of red wine during meals [39, 44].
Furthermore, the presence of fruits and vegetables, which are rich in vitamins, minerals, fiber, numerous bioactive compounds, and phytochemicals in both dietary patterns, significantly contributes to cardiovascular health. This is primarily achieved through endothelium‐dependent vasodilation and the inhibition of platelet aggregation [45]. Indeed, studies indicate that a diet rich in vegetables may be associated with a lower risk of mortality from ischemic heart disease, blood pressure control, and reduced need for medication [46, 47].
The strengths of the MedDiet are also attributed to the presence of olive oil, which provides monounsaturated fatty acids, vitamin E, and polyphenols, thereby increasing NO availability, promoting vasodilation, and enhancing endothelial function [48, 49]. Another critical component is red wine, which is rich in resveratrol, a polyphenol widely studied for its effects on cardiovascular health. Resveratrol is recognized for its antioxidant and anti‐inflammatory properties, as well as its role in preventing coronary heart disease [50]. Georgoulis et al. [51] recently elucidated, in a prospective study involving 1,415 non‐hypertensive adults followed for 20 years, that adherence to the Mediterranean diet is longitudinally associated with a lower incidence of hypertension. Their findings, derived from the baseline MedDietScore, revealed that each one‐point increase in this score correlated with a 7% decrease in the 20‐year risk of developing hypertension [51].
Kong et al. [52] investigated the relationship between overall fruit, vegetable, and legume intake, including their subgroups, and the risk of hypertension in adults aged 40 years or older over a 5.2‐year period. They observed general inverse trends with hypertension risk. However, the authors also noted that frequent consumption of pickled green leafy vegetables, such as pickled cabbage which are high in sodium, was positively associated with the risk of hypertension in postmenopausal women [52].
Among the dietary patterns observed by the authors are the DASH, Mediterranean (MedDiet), vegetarian (including pescetarian, lacto‐egg‐vegetarian, and vegan diets), low‐fat, low‐carbohydrate, and Paleolithic diets. However, at the end of the statement, the authors reinforce that the DASH, Mediterranean, pescetarian and vegetarian (egg, lacto, egg/lacto) dietary patterns were scored as the patterns that were most aligned with the recommendations of the Dietary Organization of the American Heart Association for the year 2021 [53].
Thus, seeking dietary patterns that, above all, promote health, respecting personal and cultural preferences and budgetary restrictions, is a therapeutic target encouraged in patients with SAH. Table 1 summarizes the main findings from the literature regarding dietary patterns in patients with hypertension.
TABLE 1.
Studies involving dietary patterns in hypertensive patients.
| References | Dietary patterns | Sample | Results |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chen et al. [108] | 52% low‐sodium salt and DASH; normal salt and DASH | 61 SAH patients with T2D: intervention group or control group (normal salt and DASH), for 8 weeks |
Intervention group: ↓Sodium intake ↑Potassium intake ↓PP and MAP. |
| Ju et al. [109] | DASH dietary + one bag of oat bran (30 g/d, containing DF 8.9 g) | 70 essential hypertensions: control group or intervention group, for 3 months. |
↓the 24 h maximum HR ↓24 h average HR; 24 h maximum HR; average HR. During daytime; minimum HR during daytime; and maximum HR during daytime. |
| Vasei et al. [110] | DASH diet, based on vegetable or animal proteins | 90 obese patients with metabolic syndrome: DASH diet, based on vegetable or animal proteins, for 8 weeks. |
In both groups: ↓ Fasting plasma glucose, SBP and DBP, triglyceride, and weight. |
| Belanger et al. [111] | DASH diet x TAD | 412 adults with high BP or SAH: 12 weeks of the DASH or TAD diet |
In both groups: ↓ NT‐proBNP levels. DASH diet: ↓ High‐sensitivity cardiac troponin I and hs‐CRP. |
| Filipou et al. [11] | DASH diet with salt restriction x MedDiet with salt restriction | 240 adults with high normal blood pressure or high‐grade SAH: medication; salt restriction; DASH diet + salt restriction or MedDiet + salt restriction. |
Compared to the medication group: ↓ Office and 24‐h ambulatory SBP and DBP. ↓ SBP in the MedDiet group compared with all other study groups. Both diets were more effective in reducing BP compared with the salt‐restricted group. |
| Saslow et al. [112] | DASH x very low‐carbohydrate diet (VLCD) | 94 adults with triple multimorbidity (SAH, prediabetes or T2D, and overweight or obesity) were randomized into one of two diet models. |
VLCD: ↓ Mean SBP. Greater improvement in HbA1c and weight. |
| Zou et al. [113] | Low‐sodium salt applied to a Chinese modified DASH diet | 61 older adults with SAH and T2D: low sodium salt or normal sodium salt group, for 8 weeks. |
Low sodium salt: ↓ Ankle brachial index, brachial and ankle pulse wave conduction velocity. The normal sodium salt: ↓ Ankle brachial index |
| De Oliveira et al. [114] | DASH dietary guidance and dietary guidance plus encouragement to walk with a pedometer (DASHPED) | 35 patients with T2D and uncontrolled SAH: DASH group or DASHPED group, for 16 weeks. |
DASHPED: ↑ Physical activity of 1721 steps/day. In both groups: ↓ Weight, BMI, and waking diastolic pressures on ambulatory BP monitoring. |
| Sangouni et al. [115] | DASH diet versus healthy diet | 60 individuals with metabolic syndrome: DASH diet or control diet group. |
↓ Waist circumference, BMI, weight, SBP, DBP. ↓ Triglyceride, total cholesterol and LDL‐c. |
| Çapar, Yilmaz [116] | DASH diet and a salt‐free diet | 60 patients with primary SAH: individualized DASH diet or salt‐free diet group, followed for 2 months. |
↓SBP in salt‐free diet. In both groups: ↓ DBP. |
| Liebman et al. [117] | Whole‐food plant‐based diets (WFPBDs) | 40 subjects with mild‐to‐moderate CKD and SAH but without diabetes or proteinuria, randomized to the 15‐day education program or the control group. |
WFPBDs group: ↓ SBP. ↔ DBP. ↓ Potassium levels, body mass, total cholesterol, LDL‐c, and HDL‐c. |
Abbreviations: BMI = body mass index, BP = blood pressure, DASH = dietary approaches to stop hypertension, DBP = diastolic blood pressure, HbA1c = glycated hemoglobin, HDL‐c = high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol, HR = heart rate, hs‐CRP = high sensitive C‐reactive protein, LDL‐c = low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol, MAP = mean arterial pressure, MedDiet = mediterranean diet, NT‐proBNP = N‐terminal pro‐B‐type natriuretic peptide, PP = pulse pressure, SAH = systemic arterial hypertension, SBP = systolic blood pressure, TAD = typical American diet.
3.2. Fruits and Vegetables as Sources of Polyphenols
Polyphenols are a diverse group of naturally occurring compounds found in fruits, vegetables, and seeds, known for their protective role against cellular damage and oxidative stress [54, 55]. Structurally composed of two or more phenol units, polyphenols are broadly categorized into flavonoids and non‐flavonoids, with flavonoids representing the most abundant subclass [55]. Dietary flavonoids, including anthocyanidins, flavonols, flavan‐3‐ols, flavones, flavanones, and isoflavones, are well‐known for their antioxidant, anti‐inflammatory, and vasoprotective properties. These bioactive molecules modulate enzymatic activity, increasing superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT) and glutathione peroxidase (GPx), and interfere with cellular signaling pathways such as nuclear factor erythroid 2‐related factor 2 (Nrf2), thereby enhancing endothelial function, inhibiting platelet aggregation, reducing inflammation, and improving plasma lipid profiles, which collectively contribute to cardiovascular health [12]. The main non‐flavonoid classes include phenolic acids, lignans, tannins, and stilbenes, which also exhibit antioxidant and anti‐inflammatory activities [54].
Among flavonoids, compounds such as quercetin and catechin have demonstrated the ability to modulate key pathways, decreasing NF‐κB and increasing Nrf2, which contribute to reduced oxidative stress, suppression of pro‐inflammatory cytokines (e.g., TNF‐α, IL‐1, IL‐6), and increased expression of heme oxygenase‐1 (HO‐1) [12]. Quercetin, in particular, exhibits strong free radical‐scavenging activity by neutralizing ROS, including superoxide anion radical (O2•–) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) [54]. Furthermore, flavonoids exert antihypertensive effects by improving endothelial function, mainly through increased NO bioavailability, decreased ROS production, and activation of the PI3K/Akt/eNOS or AMPK signaling pathways [12]. Additionally, these compounds can influence vascular smooth muscle cells by promoting potassium channel activation and inhibiting calcium influx, leading to vascular relaxation and decreased vascular resistance [12, 56].
In particular, proanthocyanidins, a subclass of polyphenols, have been associated with reductions in systolic and diastolic blood pressure, as well as mean arterial pressure. These effects are attributed to increased NO production, improved endothelial function, and inhibition of ACE activity [13]. Similarly, observational studies across large U.S. and Chinese populations have consistently shown an inverse association between total dietary flavonoid or polyphenol intake and the risk of hypertension, with subclasses such as flavan‐3‐ols, anthocyanidins, and flavonols being particularly protective [57, 58, 59]. Beyond their vascular effects, anthocyanins exhibit antioxidant activity by activating the ERK/Nrf2 signaling pathway, which enhances the expression of HO‐1 and NQO1, thereby strengthening the body's antioxidant defense system and reducing oxidative stress [56]. Additionally, data from the PREDIMED trial indicated that moderate to high tomato consumption (>110 g/day, roughly equivalent to a large‐sized tomato), rich in the lycopene, was associated with significant reductions in DBP and lower risk of hypertension in older adults at high cardiovascular risk [60].
Lagou et al. [61] conducted a meta‐analysis involving 5,205 participants to evaluate the effect of flavan‐3‐ol‐rich food, beverage, or supplement intake on BP and endothelial function. The authors included interventions with epicatechin, epigallocatechin‐gallate, cocoa products, tea, grape extract, and apples that supplied 586 mg of flavan‐3‐ols, and the results showed improvement in high blood pressure and endothelial function [61]. A meta‐analysis demonstrated that regular intake of tea, especially green tea, for more than 3 months can reduce SBP and DBP in individuals with high BP or hypertension [62]. Furthermore, another meta‐analysis demonstrated that green tea was also effective in reducing SBP and DBP in short‐term trials (6–13 weeks) [63].
Regarding the different types of teas, it was reported that green tea, in particular, contains the highest total content of phenolics and flavonoids such as epicatechin (EC), (‐)‐epigallocatechin, (‐)‐epicatechin‐3‐gallate, and (‐)‐epigallocatechin‐3‐gallate [64], in addition to having the most significant antioxidant power and free radical scavenging capacity [65]. The main pathways underlying the hypotensive effects attributed to regular tea intake include the maintenance of endothelial and vascular function, the improvement of blood flow by enhancing NO bioavailability, the suppression of the renin‐angiotensin‐aldosterone system, the scavenging of ROS, and the activation of antioxidant enzymes [64, 65, 66].
In addition to flavonoids, curcumin, a polyphenol found in turmeric, has shown promising antihypertensive potential [14], primarily attributed to its antioxidant and anti‐inflammatory properties, scavenging free radicals and enhancing endothelial function through upregulation of eNOS, which contributes to arterial vasodilation, reduction of arterial stiffness, and prevention of ventricular dysfunction [54, 67]. A recent systematic review and meta‐analysis revealed that curcumin or turmeric supplementation reduced SBP, DBP, and VCAM‐1 levels, while improving flow‐mediated dilation (FMD), suggesting enhanced endothelial function [14]. Another meta‐analysis, conducted by Karimi et al. [68], included 1377 participants and demonstrated that curcumin consumption can improve DBP, provided it is consumed for at least 12 weeks [68]. Preclinical studies further showed that nanoemulsified curcumin had even greater efficacy, reducing BP and oxidative stress markers more effectively than conventional formulations. These effects are attributed to its antioxidant properties, including reduced lipid peroxidation and increased levels of antioxidant enzymes, such as glutathione, catalase, and superoxide dismutase [69].
Propolis, a natural resinous substance collected by bees rich in phenolic acids, and lignans, has also been associated with a significant reduction in SBP, although the effect on DBP was not statistically significant [70]. In addition, in vivo studies have demonstrated propolis antihypertensive effects by enhancing NO bioavailability, increasing antioxidant enzyme activity, suppressing the NF‐κB pathway, and reducing pro‐inflammatory cytokine levels [71]. Table 2 displays recent studies involving polyphenols in hypertension, and Figure 2 summarizes how the polyphenols modulate blood pressure.
TABLE 2.
Clinical trial involving polyphenols in hypertension.
| References | Study/sample | Intervention | Results |
|---|---|---|---|
| Marhuenda et al. [118] | RCT with pre‐hypertensive or type 1 hypertensive | 500 mg of HS‐LC extracts (175 mg of HS + 325 mg of LC) or placebo for 84 days | ↓ SBP and daytime SBP |
| Vors et al. [119] | RCT with pre‐hypertension | 4 capsules/day of polyphenol extract (764 mg/day) + 2 g/day of L‐citrulline or placebo; for 6 weeks | ↓ Ambulatory SBP in women |
| Sayec et al. [120] | RCT with prehypertensive | Encapsulated aronia berry extract (106 mg polyphenols) or placebo; for 12 weeks |
↔ BP and endothelial function Aronia extract: ↓ Awake PWV and AIx |
| Sangouni et al. [121] | RCT with metabolic syndrome | Curcumin (200 mg) + placebo; Coenzyme Q10 (60 mg) + placebo; Curcumin (200 mg) + coenzyme Q10 (60 mg); double placebo group; for 12 weeks. |
Curcumin + Placebo: ↓ TG, TC, LDL‐c ↑ HDL‐c Curcumin+Q10: ↓ TG ↔ SBP and DBP |
| Taladrid et al. [122] | RCT with high‐risk cardiovascular and healthy subjects | 2 g day of Grape pomace seasoning or control, for 6 weeks. | ↓ SBP, DBP, MAP |
| Tucci et al. [123] | RCT with mild hypertension | Acute effect of a portion of blueberry (250 g) versus a control product (C). |
↑ RHI ↔ SBP and DBP |
Abbreviations: AIx , augmentation index; BP , blood pressure; DBP , diastolic blood pressure; HDL‐c , high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol; HS‐LC , Hibiscus sabdariffa and Lippia citriodora; LDL‐c , low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol; MAP , mean arterial pressure; PWV , pulse wave velocity; RCT , randomized clinical trial; RHI , reactive hyperemia index; SBP , systolic blood pressure; TC , total cholesterol; TG , triglycerides.
FIGURE 2.

Mechanisms by which dietary polyphenols contribute to blood pressure regulation. Polyphenols exert antihypertensive effects through multiple pathways: (a) inhibition of NF‐κB activation, thereby reducing the production of pro‐inflammatory cytokines (IL‐1, IL‐6, TNF‐α); (b) activation of the Nrf2 pathway, leading to upregulation of antioxidant enzymes such as HO‐1, NQO1, SOD, CAT, and GPx; (c) enhancement of NO bioavailability, promoting endothelial function and vasodilation; and (d) inhibition of the renin‐angiotensin system, particularly ACE activity, reducing angiotensin II formation. Collectively, these actions contribute to improved vascular relaxation, reduced vascular resistance, and ultimately, blood pressure reduction.
3.3. Beetroot
Beetroot (Beta vulgaris), an edible taproot, has gained attention due to its health benefits, including antioxidant, anti‐inflammatory, anticarcinogenic, antidiabetic, hepatoprotective, and hypotensive properties [72]. It is rich in biologically active compounds such as betalains, flavonoids, polyphenols, and particularly inorganic nitrate (NO3 −), alongside essential minerals like potassium, sodium, phosphorus, calcium, magnesium, copper, iron, zinc, and manganese, which collectively contribute to its therapeutic potential [72].
Dietary nitrate plays a key role in BP regulation. After ingestion, NO3 − is reduced to nitrite (NO2 −) by oral anaerobic bacteria through the action of nitrate reductase. Nitrite is subsequently converted into NO in the acidic environment of the stomach and blood circulation under hypoxic conditions. NO, a potent vasodilator, rapidly diffuses into vascular smooth muscle cells, promoting relaxation via stimulation of cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) production and subsequent intracellular calcium extrusion. This cascade results in vasodilation, reduced peripheral resistance, and, consequently, lowered BP [73]. Beyond its endogenous synthesis from L‐arginine via nitric oxide synthase (NOS), the nitrate‐nitrite‐NO pathway offers a complementary route to increase NO availability, particularly relevant when endogenous NO production is impaired [73].
Similarly, a meta‐analysis by Benjamim et al. [74] involving seven randomized controlled trials confirmed that nitrate‐rich BRJ intake led to a reduction in SBP. However, the impact on DBP was not statistically significant. Additional studies, such as those by Kapil et al. [75] and Kerley et al. [76], have shown that both short‐term (7 days) and longer‐term (4 weeks) BRJ supplementation enhances NO bioavailability and contributes to meaningful reductions in systolic and diastolic blood pressure. Furthermore, mechanistic studies indicate that NO‐induced increases in cGMP levels in vascular smooth muscle cells play a central role in promoting vasorelaxation, as demonstrated by Asgary et al. [77] in interventions using raw and cooked beetroot. In line with these findings, Fejes et al. [78] reported that 1 month of daily supplementation with nitrate‐rich BRJ (∼800 mg/day) in older adults with hypertension significantly increased plasma nitrite and nitrate levels, reduced oxLDL/NOx ratio and hs‐CRP concentrations, and improved redox status through a higher GSH/GSSG ratio, highlighting its antioxidant and anti‐inflammatory potential in this population.
Although the physiological functions of inorganic nitrate are recognized, moderate consumption should be recommended and the source should be evaluated, as excess may be involved in potentially harmful pathways. Under acidic gastric conditions, nitrite derived from nitrate can participate in the formation of N‐nitroso compounds in the presence of amine precursors, some of which have carcinogenic potential. Furthermore, heat treatments such as high‐temperature cooking, curing, or frying can promote the formation of nitrosamines from nitrate and nitrite. Despite this, evidence indicates that the health effects of nitrate consumption depend on the level of exposure, food source, food matrix and storage with risks generally higher associated with non‐vegetable sources such as processed meats but also processed food or contaminated water rather than fresh plant sources [79, 80, 81, 82].
3.4. Spirulina
Spirulina (Arthrospira maxima or platensis) is a blue‐green microalga rich in proteins, carbohydrates, essential fatty acids, carotenoids, γ‐linolenic acid, chlorophyll, and the notable phycocyanins. Recognized as a functional food, Spirulina has demonstrated significant antihypertensive potential, primarily attributed to its high content of phycocyanin and bioactive peptides with antioxidant and anti‐inflammatory properties, contributing to potential benefits in the management of cardiometabolic diseases, including hypertension [83, 84]. Spirulina acts to improve endothelial function by enhancing NO production and inhibiting NADPH oxidase activity [85]. Phycocyanin also exhibits anti‐inflammatory effects by modulating Toll‐like Receptor (TLR) and NF‐κB signaling pathways [86].
A systematic review demonstrated that Spirulina maxima supplementation has beneficial effects on BP, with its hypotensive effects primarily attributed to bioactive components such as phycocyanin and the tripeptide Ile‐Gln‐Pro [83]. These compounds act by increasing eNOS expression, enhancing NO production, and inhibiting ACE activity through the ACE‐I inhibitor peptide [84, 87]. The authors reported that a lower dose of 266 mg/day did not produce reductions in blood pressure, but doses above 2 g/day decreased SBP and DBP. Additionally, a dose of 4.5 g/day further reduced SBP and improved vascular health, with a reduction in the stiffness index [83]. Complementary to these findings, an in vivo study with hypertensive rat arteries demonstrated that the incubation with aqueous Spirulina extract enhanced vasodilation, associated with increased NO release, as well as upregulation of p‐Akt and HO‐1 expression [88].
Supporting these findings, a systematic review and meta‐analysis by Machowiec et al. [89] found that Spirulina supplementation led to reductions in both SBP and DBP. Doses ranged from 1 to 8 g/day over periods of 2 to 12 weeks, demonstrating effectiveness particularly in hypertensive populations. Confirming these effects, Shiri et al. [90] conducted a meta‐analysis of randomized clinical trials, assessed using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach and the Cochrane assessment method were employed to evaluate the risk of bias. Spirulina supplementation was associated with a mean reduction of 4.41 mmHg in SBP and 2.84 mmHg in DBP [90].
A study by Szulińska et al. [91] demonstrated reductions in IL‐6 levels and improvements in total antioxidant status in hypertensive and obese patients after Spirulina supplementation. These findings suggest that Spirulina supplementation may lower BP and improve vascular health, potentially through mechanisms involving enhanced NO bioavailability, antioxidant activity, and reduced systemic inflammation.
3.5. Probiotic
Changes in gut microbiota composition and function, known as gut dysbiosis, have been widely associated with SAH [92, 93]. Also, the proportion of the Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes phyla is increased. Regarding species, some bacteria are increased in individuals with SAH, such as Eubacterium rectale, Klebsiella, Streptococcus, and Parabacteroides. In contrast, others, especially those producing short‐chain fatty acids, are decreased, including Roseburia and Bacillus freundii [93]. Therapeutic strategies to reverse this hypertension‐associated gut dysbiosis are being explored. In this scenario, probiotics emerge as essential modulators of the disturbed microbiota [94].
From a pre‐clinical point of view, probiotics seem to have more consistent effects in improving BP, as shown by a range of studies in hypertensive rats [95, 96, 97, 98, 99]. The effect of metabolic endotoxemia has been adopted to explain the benefits of probiotics in improving hypertension‐associated oxidative stress. Probiotics can increase the number of butyrate‐producing bacteria, thereby improving gut barrier integrity. This process leads to lower translocation of bacterial endotoxin into the circulation and prevents activation of the Toll‐like receptor 4 (TLR4) pathway in the vasculature. The TLR4 pathway is well known for stimulating oxidative stress by increasing ROS, mainly NADPH oxidase O2, which subsequently reacts with NO, decreasing its bioavailability, favoring endothelial dysfunction, and affecting BP. Therefore, by improving gut integrity, probiotics can inhibit the TLR4 pathway in the vasculature and improve BP [97]. Moreover, probiotics may overregulate PPARβ and γ expression, which acts by inhibiting NF‐κB signaling and inflammatory response in the vascular wall, consequently improving hypertension‐associated inflammation [100].
3.6. Garlic
Garlic (Allium sativum) contains organosulfur compounds among its bioactive components. These organic compounds, which contain sulfur as a key structural element, have been linked to improvements in hypertension, and it is considered a potential adjuvant in the treatment of this cardiovascular condition [101, 102]. As a natural exogenous source of hydrogen sulfide (H2S), garlic releases this molecule, triggering various physiological effects. In this context, sulfur‐containing compounds in garlic promote vasodilation by enhancing H2S release, leading to antihypertensive effects [103]. H2S belongs to a class of molecules known as endogenous gasotransmitters, which, due to their solubility in both aqueous environments and membranes, play a role in vascular tone regulation. Reduced levels of H2S have been linked to CVDs, including hypertension, suggesting its crucial role in maintaining vascular health [103, 104]. It is well established that, over time, specific sulfur‐based constituents, such as allicin, undergo chemical transformations, resulting in the generation of novel bioactive compounds. One of the products of this modification is s‐allyl‐cysteine (SAC), which has antioxidant, anti‐inflammatory, and redox modulating action. SAC is present in high concentrations in aged black garlic (ABG), which makes this component potentially beneficial as it improves blood flow and is effective in the vasorelaxation process [105].
Garlic and Extract of Fermented Allium (EFA) have a mechanism of action similar to that of N‐acetylcysteine, which increases the bioavailability of NO. This vasodilator helps maintain blood pressure homeostasis. On the other hand, it also contains compounds capable of reducing the synthesis of ROS, which are responsible for NO consumption, such as O2‐. One of the vasodilation mechanisms that promotes BP reduction from garlic's bioactive compounds occurs when the enzyme cystathionine lyase (CSE) catalyzes the breakdown of sulfur compounds, such as those found in garlic, into hydrogen sulfide. H2S then acts as a signaling molecule that directly affects potassium channels in the blood vessels, inducing vasodilation and improving endothelial function. Therefore, garlic or EFA supplementation is potentially effective in reducing BP, especially in cases of mild hypertension [106].
The researchers observed that consumption of EFA tea significantly reduced SBP, and when administered in higher doses, it also reduced DBP levels. These results suggest that EFA supplements may serve as a valuable adjunct to conventional antihypertensive treatments [107]. The findings indicate that supplementation with various garlic‐derived bioactive compounds represents an effective non‐pharmacological strategy for supporting hypertension management (Table 3).
TABLE 3.
Studies involving organic compounds from garlic and hypertensive patients.
| References | Study/sample | Intervention | Results |
|---|---|---|---|
| Soleimani et al. [124] | RCT with 98 patients with nonalcoholic liver disease and diet‐controlled BP with or without antihypertensive medication. | 400 mg garlic tablet (1.5 mg Allicin) or placebo, two times a day for 15 weeks. |
↓ SBP, DBP, and MAP ↓ hs‐CRP |
| Fogacci et al. [125] | Non‐randomized, diet‐controlled clinical trial, 40 patients with high‐normal BP or hypertension I | DASH diet 2 weeks before intervention. The intervention group received 2 capsules of SelectSIEVE SlowBeat (140 mg black garlic + 60 mg of pomegranate per capsule), for 1 month. | ↓ SBP and DBP |
| Mohammadi et al. [126] | Randomized, crossover, triple‐blind, placebo‐controlled clinical trial with hypertensive patients | 5 g/day of dark chocolate (650 mg of microencapsulated FGE powder) or the placebo, for 6 weeks. | ↔ BP, lipid profile, serum homocysteine, hs‐CRP, MDA and TAC |
| Houston et al. [127] | An open clinical trial with 12 patients with elevated blood pressure | 2 capsules of Vascanox HP® tablets (242 mg of nitrate + SAC) once a day, for 4 weeks. |
↑ Salivary NO2 −, NO3 − ↓ SBP and DBP |
| Serrano et al. [102] | RCT with 77 participants with hypertension I | One tablet of AGB (250 mg of ABG extract) or placebo, for 12 weeks. |
↓ SBP and DBP ↑ NO and antioxidant capacity ↓ ACE activity |
| Rahmatinia et al. [128] | RCT with 96 participants with prehypertension | Two capsules of freeze‐dried garlic extract daily or placebo, for 8 weeks. |
↓ SBP, DBP, and MAP ↓ TG, LDL‐c, TC ↑ HDL‐c ↑ NO |
Abbreviations: ABG , aged black garlic; ACE , angiotensin‐converting enzyme; BP , blood pressure; DASH Diet , dietary approaches to stop hypertension; DBP , diastolic blood pressure; FGE , fermented garlic extract; HDL‐c , high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol; hs‐CRP , high sensitive C‐reactive protein; LDL‐c , low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol; MAP , mean arterial pressure; MDA , malondialdehyde; NO , nitric oxide; NO2− , nitrite; NO3− , nitrate; RCT , randomized clinical trial; SAC , S‐alil‐L‐cisteína; SBP , systolic blood pressure; TAC , total antioxidant capacity; TC , total cholesterol; TG , triglycerides.
4. Conclusion
Despite advances in pharmacological management, hypertension remains a significant global public health concern, with persistent challenges in achieving optimal blood pressure control. The intricate interplay between oxidative stress, inflammation, and endothelial dysfunction plays a central role in the pathophysiology of hypertension, reinforcing the need for complementary strategies beyond conventional treatment. This narrative review critically highlights the growing body of evidence supporting dietary interventions and specific bioactive compounds, such as polyphenols, probiotics, curcumin, beetroot, garlic, and spirulina, as promising adjuncts in modulating key molecular pathways implicated in hypertension.
While numerous clinical and preclinical studies report antihypertensive effects of these compounds, primarily through enhancement of nitric oxide bioavailability, suppression of pro‐inflammatory cytokines, and attenuation of oxidative stress, several limitations persist. Notably, heterogeneity in study design, dosage, bioavailability, duration of interventions, and populations studied limits the generalizability and clinical translation of current findings. Furthermore, the efficacy of certain foods remains inconsistent, particularly in hypertensive populations, underscoring the urgent need for well‐designed randomized controlled trials with standardized protocols.
Moving forward, research should aim to establish mechanistic clarity, identify optimal dosing regimens, assess long‐term safety profiles, and investigate synergistic effects with pharmacological therapies. Additionally, tailoring nutritional strategies to individual genetic, microbiota, and lifestyle profiles may pave the way for precision nutrition in hypertension care. Until such evidence is robustly consolidated, dietary approaches should be considered supportive, rather than substitutive, tools in the multifactorial management of hypertension.
Author Contributions
Agnes Ciafrino: conceptualization, writing – original draft, reviewing and editing. Victor Côrtes, Ronaldo A. O. C. Gismondi: reviewing and editing. Marcia Ribeiro, Karen S. Coutinho‐Wolino and Thais Ionara: writing – original draft, reviewing and editing. Denise Mafra and Ludmila F.M.F. Cardozo: conceptualization, reviewing and editing, supervision.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Acknowledgments
Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro – FAPERJ (E‐26/200.063/2026 and E‐26/200.284/2023) and Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico supported the Denise Mafra and Ludmila FMF Cardozo research (407814/2024‐8 and 305822/2025‐0).
The Article Processing Charge for the publication of this research was funded by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior ‐ Brasil (CAPES).
Data Availability Statement
Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.
References
- 1. World Health Organization . Global Report on Hypertension: The Race Against a Silent Killer (World Health Organization, 2023), https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/372896. [Google Scholar]
- 2. McEvoy J. W., McCarthy C. P., Bruno R. M., et al., “2024 ESC Guidelines for the Management of Elevated Blood Pressure and Hypertension,” European Heart Journal 45, no. 38 (2024): 3912–4018, 10.1093/eurheartj/ehae178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Oparil S., Acelajado M. C., Bakris G. L., et al., “Hypertension,” Nature Reviews Disease Primers 4, no. 1 (2018): 18014–18014, 10.1038/nrdp.2018.14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Sanders T. A. B., “Hypertension,” in Present Knowledge in Nutrition: Clinical and Applied Topics in Nutrition (Elsevier, 2020), 379–391. [Google Scholar]
- 5. Schutte A. E., Jafar T. H., Poulter N. R., et al., “Addressing Global Disparities in Blood Pressure Control: Perspectives of the International Society of Hypertension,” Cardiovascular Research 119, no. 2 (2023): 381–409, 10.1093/cvr/cvac130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Fu J., Liu Y., Zhang L., et al., “Nonpharmacologic Interventions for Reducing Blood Pressure in Adults With Prehypertension to Established Hypertension,” Journal of the American Heart Association 9, no. 19 (2020): 016804, 10.1161/JAHA.120.016804. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Tasnim S., Tang C., Musini V. M., and Wright J. M., “Effect of Alcohol on Blood Pressure,” Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 7, no. 7 (2020); CD012787, 10.1002/14651858.CD012787.pub2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Edwards J. J., Deenmamode A. H. P., Griffiths M., et al., “Exercise Training and Resting Blood Pressure: A Large‐Scale Pairwise and Network Meta‐Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials,” British Journal of Sports Medicine 57, no. 20 (2023): 1317–1326, 10.1136/bjsports-2022-106503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Kreutz R., Brunström M., Burnier M., et al., “2024 European Society of Hypertension Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Arterial Hypertension,” European Journal of Internal Medicine 126 (2024): 1–15, 10.1016/j.ejim.2024.05.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Theodoridis X., Chourdakis M., Chrysoula L., et al., “Adherence to the DASH Diet and Risk of Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis,” Nutrients 15, no. 14 (2023): 3261–3261, 10.3390/nu15143261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Filippou C., Thomopoulos C., Konstantinidis D., et al., “DASH vs. Mediterranean Diet on a Salt Restriction Background in Adults With High Normal Blood Pressure or Grade 1 Hypertension: A Randomized Controlled Trial,” Clinical Nutrition 42, no. 10 (2023): 1807–1816, 10.1016/j.clnu.2023.08.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Jomova K., Alomar S. Y., Valko R., et al., “Flavonoids and Their Role in Oxidative Stress, Inflammation, and human Diseases,” Chemico‐Biological Interactions 413 (2025): 111489–111489, 10.1016/j.cbi.2025.111489. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Ren J., An J., Chen M., Yang H., and Ma Y., “Effect of Proanthocyanidins on Blood Pressure: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials,” Pharmacological Research 165 (2021): 105329–105329, 10.1016/j.phrs.2020.105329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Dehzad M. J., Ghalandari H., and Askarpour M., “Curcumin/Turmeric Supplementation Could Improve Blood Pressure and Endothelial Function: A Grade‐Assessed Systematic Review and Dose–Response Meta‐analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials,” Clinical Nutrition ESPEN 59 (2024): 194–207, 10.1016/j.clnesp.2023.12.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Huang L., Trieu K., Yoshimura S., et al., “Effect of Dose and Duration of Reduction in Dietary Sodium on Blood Pressure Levels: Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis of Randomised Trials,” BMJ 368 (2020): m315, 10.1136/bmj.m315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Guzik T. J., Nosalski R., Maffia P., and Drummond G. R., “Immune and Inflammatory Mechanisms in Hypertension,” Nature Reviews Cardiology 21, no. 6 (2024): 396–416, 10.1038/s41569-023-00964-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Deussen A. and Kopaliani I., “Targeting Inflammation in Hypertension,” Current Opinion in Nephrology & Hypertension 32, no. 2 (2023): 111–117, 10.1097/MNH.0000000000000862. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. He L., Fan C., and Li G., “The Relationship Between Serum C‐reactive Protein and Senile Hypertension,” BMC Cardiovascular Disorders 22, no. 1 (2022): 500–500, 10.1186/s12872-022-02948-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Caiazzo E., Sharma M., Rezig A. O. M., et al., “Circulating Cytokines and Risk of Developing Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis,” Pharmacological Research 200 (2024): 107050–107050, 10.1016/j.phrs.2023.107050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Gallo G., Volpe M., and Savoia C., “Endothelial Dysfunction in Hypertension: Current Concepts and Clinical Implications,” Frontiers in Medicine 8 (2022): 798958, 10.3389/fmed.2021.798958. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Nadar S. K. and Goyal D., “Inflammation and Hypertension: More Evidence but Is There Anything New?,” Journal of Human Hypertension 35, no. 7 (2021): 561–563, 10.1038/s41371-020-00463-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Xiao L. and Harrison D. G., “Inflammation in Hypertension,” Canadian Journal of Cardiology 36, no. 5 (2020): 635–647, 10.1016/j.cjca.2020.01.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Zhang Z., Zhao L., Zhou X., Meng X., and Zhou X., “Role of Inflammation, Immunity, and Oxidative Stress in Hypertension: New Insights and Potential Therapeutic Targets,” Frontiers in Immunology 13 (2023): 1098725, 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1098725. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Griendling K. K., Camargo L. L., Rios F. J., Alves‐Lopes R., Montezano A. C., and Touyz R. M., “Oxidative Stress and Hypertension,” Circulation Research 128, no. 7 (2021): 993–1020, 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.121.318063. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Camargo L. L., Rios F. J., Montezano A. C., and Touyz R. M., “Reactive Oxygen Species in Hypertension,” Nature Reviews Cardiology 22, no. 1 (2025): 20–37, 10.1038/s41569-024-01062-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Ertuglu L. A., Mutchler A. P., Yu J., and Kirabo A., “Inflammation and Oxidative Stress in Salt Sensitive Hypertension; the Role of the NLRP3 Inflammasome,” Frontiers in Physiology 13 (2022): 1096296, 10.3389/fphys.2022.1096296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Amponsah‐Offeh M., Diaba‐Nuhoho P., Speier S., and Morawietz H., “Oxidative Stress, Antioxidants and Hypertension,” Antioxidants 12, no. 2 (2023): 281–281, 10.3390/antiox12020281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Ajeigbe O. F., Ademosun A. O., and Oboh G., “Relieving the Tension in Hypertension: Food–drug Interactions and Anti‐Hypertensive Mechanisms of Food Bioactive Compounds,” Journal of Food Biochemistry 45, no. 3 (2021): 13317, 10.1111/jfbc.13317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Williams B., Mancia G., Spiering W., et al., “2018 ESC/ESH Guidelines for the Management of Arterial Hypertension,” European Heart Journal 39, no. 33 (2018): 3021–3104, 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Filippini T., Malavolti M., Whelton P. K., Naska A., Orsini N., and Vinceti M., “Blood Pressure Effects of Sodium Reduction,” Circulation 143, no. 16 (2021): 1542–1567, 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.050371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Arnett D. K., Blumenthal R. S., Albert M. A., et al., “2019 ACC/AHA Guideline on the Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease: Executive Summary,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology 74, no. 10 (2019): 1376–1414, 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.03.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Wang Z., Lu C., Wang Y., et al., “Association Between Ultra‐Processed Foods Consumption and the Risk of Hypertension: An Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews,” Hellenic Journal of Cardiology 76 (2024): 99–109, 10.1016/j.hjc.2023.07.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Gibney M. J., “Ultra‐Processed Foods: Definitions and Policy Issues,” Current Developments in Nutrition 3, no. 2 (2019): nzy077, 10.1093/cdn/nzy077. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Song X., Yang K., Cheng C., et al., “Higher Dietary Inflammatory Index Linked to Increased Risk of Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Dose‐Response Meta‐analysis,” European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 79, no. 6 (2025): 512–519, 10.1038/s41430-024-01530-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Campbell A. P., “DASH Eating Plan: An Eating Pattern for Diabetes Management,” Diabetes Spectrum 30, no. 2 (2017): 76–81, 10.2337/ds16-0084. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Mu L., Yu P., Xu H., et al., “Effect of Sodium Reduction Based on the DASH Diet on Blood Pressure in Hypertensive Patients With Type 2 Diabetes,” Nutrición Hospitalaria 39 (2022): 537, 10.20960/nh.04039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Nguyen H. T., Bertoni A. G., Nettleton J. A., Bluemke D. A., Levitan E. B., and Burke G. L., “DASH Eating Pattern Is Associated With Favorable Left Ventricular Function in the Multi‐Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis,” Journal of the American College of Nutrition 31, no. 6 (2012): 401–407, 10.1080/07315724.2012.10720466. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Maris S. A., Williams J. S., Sun B., Brown S., Mitchell G. F., and Conlin P. R., “Interactions of the DASH Diet With the Renin‐Angiotensin‐Aldosterone System,” Current Developments in Nutrition 3, no. 9 (2019): nzz091, 10.1093/cdn/nzz091. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Filippou C., Tatakis F., Polyzos D., et al., “Overview of Salt Restriction in the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) and the Mediterranean Diet for Blood Pressure Reduction,” Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine 23, no. 1 (2022): 36, 10.31083/j.rcm2301036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Staruschenko A., “Beneficial Effects of High Potassium,” Hypertension 71, no. 6 (2018): 1015–1022, 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.118.10267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Villa‐Etchegoyen C., Lombarte M., Matamoros N., Belizán J. M., and Cormick G., “Mechanisms Involved in the Relationship Between Low Calcium Intake and High Blood Pressure,” Nutrients 11, no. 5 (2019): 1112–1112, 10.3390/nu11051112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Juraschek S. P., Kovell L. C., Appel L. J., et al., “Effects of Diet and Sodium Reduction on Cardiac Injury, Strain, and Inflammation,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology 77, no. 21 (2021): 2625–2634, 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.03.320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Filippou C. D., Tsioufis C. P., Thomopoulos C. G., et al., “Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) Diet and Blood Pressure Reduction in Adults With and Without Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials,” Advances in Nutrition 11, no. 5 (2020): 1150–1160, 10.1093/advances/nmaa041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Bach‐Faig A., Berry E. M., Lairon D., et al., “Mediterranean Diet Pyramid Today. Science and Cultural Updates,” Public Health Nutrition 14, no. 12 (2011): 2274–2284, 10.1017/S1368980011002515. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Zheng J., Zhou Y., Li S., et al., “Effects and Mechanisms of Fruit and Vegetable Juices on Cardiovascular Diseases,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences 18, no. 3 (2017): 555–555, 10.3390/ijms18030555. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Trautwein E. A. and McKay S., “The Role of Specific Components of a Plant‐Based Diet in Management of Dyslipidemia and the Impact on Cardiovascular Risk,” Nutrients 12, no. 9 (2020): 2671–2671, 10.3390/nu12092671. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Salehin S., Rasmussen P., Mai S., et al., “Plant Based Diet and Its Effect on Cardiovascular Disease,” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 20, no. 4 (2023): 3337–3337, 10.3390/ijerph20043337. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Medina‐Remon A., Estruch R., Tresserra‐Rimbau A., Vallverdu‐Queralt A., and Lamuela‐Raventos R. M., “The Effect of Polyphenol Consumption on Blood Pressure,” Mini‐Reviews in Medicinal Chemistry 13, no. 8 (2013): 1137–1149, 10.2174/1389557511313080002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Gorzynik‐Debicka M., Przychodzen P., Cappello F., et al., “Potential Health Benefits of Olive Oil and Plant Polyphenols,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences 19, no. 3 (2018): 686–686, 10.3390/ijms19030686. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Castaldo L., Narváez A., Izzo L., et al., “Red Wine Consumption and Cardiovascular Health,” Molecules 24, no. 19 (2019): 3626–3626, 10.3390/molecules24193626. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Georgoulis M., Damigou E., Derdelakou E., et al., “Adherence to the Mediterranean Diet and 20‐Year Incidence of Hypertension: The ATTICA Prospective Epidemiological Study (2002–2022),” European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 78, no. 7 (2024): 630–638, 10.1038/s41430-024-01440-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Kong J.‐S., Kim Y.‐M., Shin M.‐H., et al., “A Comprehensive Analysis of Fruit, Vegetable, and Legume Consumption and the Risk of Hypertension: Results From the KoGES_CAVAS Cohort,” European Journal of Nutrition 63, no. 8 (2024): 3235–3253, 10.1007/s00394-024-03503-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Gardner C. D., Vadiveloo M. K., Petersen K. S., et al., “Popular Dietary Patterns: Alignment With American Heart Association 2021 Dietary Guidance: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association,” Circulation 147, no. 22 (2023): 1715–1730, 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Grewal J., Kumar V., Gandhi Y., et al., “Current Perspective and Mechanistic Insights on Bioactive Plant Secondary Metabolites for the Prevention and Treatment of Cardiovascular Diseases,” Cardiovascular & Hematological Disorders‐Drug Targets 23, no. 3 (2023): 157–176, 10.2174/011871529X262371231009132426. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Iqbal I., Wilairatana P., Saqib F., et al., “Plant Polyphenols and Their Potential Benefits on Cardiovascular Health: A Review,” Molecules 28, no. 17 (2023): 6403, 10.3390/molecules28176403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Grosso G., Godos J., Currenti W., et al., “The Effect of Dietary Polyphenols on Vascular Health and Hypertension: Current Evidence and Mechanisms of Action,” Nutrients 14, no. 3 (2022): 545–545, 10.3390/nu14030545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Lim J. Y., Kim W., and Ha A. W., “The Effect of Curcumin on Blood Pressure and Cognitive Impairment in Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats,” Nutrition Research and Practice 17, no. 2 (2023): 192–192, 10.4162/nrp.2023.17.2.192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Hu B., Wang Y., Feng J., and Hou L., “The Association Between Flavonoids Intake and Hypertension in U.S. Adults: A Cross‐Sectional Study From The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey,” Journal of Clinical Hypertension 26, no. 5 (2024): 573–583, 10.1111/jch.14807. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Wan Y., Ma D., Shang Q., and Xu H., “Association between Dietary Flavonoid Intake and Hypertension Among U.S. Adults,” Frontiers in Immunology 15 (2024): 1380493, 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1380493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Murcia‐Lesmes D., Domínguez‐López I., Laveriano‐Santos E. P., et al., “Association Between Tomato Consumption and Blood Pressure in an Older Population at High Cardiovascular Risk: Observational Analysis of PREDIMED Trial,” European Journal of Preventive Cardiology 31, no. 8 (2024): 922–934, 10.1093/eurjpc/zwad363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Lagou V., Greyling A., Ferruzzi M. G., et al., “Impact of Flavan‐3‐ols on Blood Pressure and Endothelial Function in Diverse Populations: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials,” European Journal of Preventive Cardiology 32, no. 14 (2025): 1322–1334, 10.1093/eurjpc/zwaf173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Mahdavi‐Roshan M., Salari A., Ghorbani Z., and Ashouri A., “The Effects of Regular Consumption of Green or Black Tea Beverage on Blood Pressure in Those With Elevated Blood Pressure or Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis,” Complementary Therapies in Medicine 51 (2020): 102430–102430, 10.1016/j.ctim.2020.102430. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Xu R., Yang K., Ding J., and Chen G., “Effect of Green Tea Supplementation on Blood Pressure,” Medicine 99, no. 6 (2020): 1904, 10.1097/MD.0000000000019047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Tran H. H.‐V., Mansoor M., Butt S. R. R., et al., “Impact of Green Tea Consumption on the Prevalence of Cardiovascular Outcomes: A Systematic Review,” Cureus 15, no. 12 (2023): 49775, 10.7759/cureus.49775. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Shannon E., Jaiswal A. K., and Abu‐Ghannam N., “Polyphenolic Content and Antioxidant Capacity of White, Green, Black, and Herbal Teas: A Kinetic Study,” Food Research 2, no. 1 (2017): 1–11, 10.26656/fr.2017.2(1).117. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Li D., Wang R., Huang J., et al., “Effects and Mechanisms of Tea Regulating Blood Pressure: Evidences and Promises,” Nutrients 11, no. 5 (2019): 1115–1115, 10.3390/nu11051115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Tang F., Liu D., Zhang L., et al., “Targeting Endothelial Cells With Golden Spice Curcumin: A Promising Therapy for Cardiometabolic Multimorbidity,” Pharmacological Research 197 (2023): 106953–106953, 10.1016/j.phrs.2023.106953. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Karimi A., Jazani A. M., Darzi M., Azgomi R. N. D., and Vajdi M., “Effects of Curcumin on Blood Pressure: A Systematic Review and Dose‐Response Meta‐Analysis,” Nutrition, Metabolism and Cardiovascular Diseases 33, no. 11 (2023): 2089–2101, 10.1016/j.numecd.2023.07.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Ishaq M., Khan M. F., Verma G., et al., “Curcumin Nanoemulsion: Unveiling Cardioprotective Effects via ACE Inhibition and Antioxidant Properties in Hypertensive Rats,” Medicina 59, no. 10 (2023): 1748, 10.3390/medicina59101748. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Qu H., Cao L., Wen Z., LI C., and Xiao M., “The Effect of Propolis Supplementation on Blood Pressure: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Controlled Trials,” Minerva Cardiology and Angiology 73, no. 6 (2025): 752–762, published online January 2025, 10.23736/s2724-5683.24.06656-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Khoshandam A., Hedayatian A., Mollazadeh A., Razavi B. M., and Hosseinzadeh H., “Propolis and Its Constituents Against Cardiovascular Risk Factors Including Obesity, Hypertension, Atherosclerosis, Diabetes, and Dyslipidemia: A Comprehensive Review,” Iranian Journal of Basic Medical Sciences 26, no. 8 (2023): 853–871, 10.22038/IJBMS.2023.67793.14835. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Mirmiran P., Houshialsadat Z., Gaeini Z., Bahadoran Z., and Azizi F., “Functional Properties of Beetroot (Beta vulgaris) in Management of Cardio‐metabolic Diseases,” Nutrition & Metabolism 17, no. 1 (2020): 3, 10.1186/s12986-019-0421-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. Grönroos R., Eggertsen R., and Bernhardsson S., “Effects of Beetroot Juice on Blood Pressure in Hypertension According to European Society of Hypertension Guidelines: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis,” Nutrition, Metabolism and Cardiovascular Diseases 34, no. 10 (2024): 2240–2256, 10.1016/j.numecd.2024.06.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74. Benjamim C. J. R., Porto A. A., Valenti V. E., et al., “Nitrate Derived From Beetroot Juice Lowers Blood Pressure in Patients With Arterial Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis,” Frontiers in Nutrition 9 (2022): 823039, 10.3389/fnut.2022.823039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Kapil V., Khambata R. S., Robertson A., Caulfield M. J., and Ahluwalia A., “Dietary Nitrate Provides Sustained Blood Pressure Lowering in Hypertensive Patients,” Hypertension 65, no. 2 (2015): 320–327, 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.114.04675. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76. Kerley C. P., Dolan E., James P. E., and Cormican L., “Dietary Nitrate Lowers Ambulatory Blood Pressure in Treated, Uncontrolled Hypertension: A 7‐d, Double‐blind, Randomised, Placebo‐Controlled, Cross‐Over Trial,” British Journal of Nutrition 119, no. 6 (2018): 658–663, 10.1017/S0007114518000144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77. Asgary S., Afshani M. R., Sahebkar A., et al., “Improvement of Hypertension, Endothelial Function and Systemic Inflammation Following Short‐Term Supplementation With Red Beet (Beta vulgaris L.) Juice: A Randomized Crossover Pilot Study,” Journal of Human Hypertension 30, no. 10 (2016): 627–632, 10.1038/jhh.2016.34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78. Fejes R., Pilat N., Lutnik M., et al., “Effects of Increased Nitrate Intake From Beetroot Juice on Blood Markers of Oxidative Stress and Inflammation in Older Adults With Hypertension,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine 222 (2024): 519–530, 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2024.07.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79. Schrenk D., Bignami M., Bodin L., et al., “Risk Assessment of N‐Nitrosamines in Food,” EFSA Journal 21, no. 3 (2023): 07884, 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.7884. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80. Chih P.‐S., Wang W.‐R., Chen C.‐Y., et al., “Influence of Cooking and Storage Conditions on the Formation of N‐Nitrosamines in Processed Meats and Pickled Fish,” LWT 224 (2025): 117822, 10.1016/j.lwt.2025.117822. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 81. Long B., Jiang C., Liu Z., Wan P., and Guo Q., “Association of Dietary Nitrate and Nitrite From Plant Sources With Digestive System Cancer Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis,” Nutrition & Metabolism 22, no. 1 (2025): 84, 10.1186/s12986-025-00973-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82. Clayton‐Cuch D., Niklas A. A., Duedahl‐Olesen L., Amlund H., and Sloth J. J., “Nitrite, Nitrate and N‐nitrosamine Occurrence in Processed Nitrate Accumulating Vegetables Stored Under Different Conditions,” Food Chemistry 493 (2025): 145631, 10.1016/j.foodchem.2025.145631. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83. Firdaus M. and Priambodo A. F., “Impact of Spirulina Supplementation on Obesity, Hypertension, Hyperglycemia, and Hyperlipidemia: A Systematic Review,” Scientifica 2025, no. 1 (2025): 6637793, 10.1155/sci5/6637793. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84. Pinto‐Leite M., Martins D., Ferreira A. C., et al., “The Role of Chlorella and Spirulina as Adjuvants of Cardiovascular Risk Factor Control: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials,” Nutrients 17, no. 6 (2025): 943–943, 10.3390/nu17060943. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85. Sokary S., Bawadi H., Zakaria Z. Z., and Al‐Asmakh M., “The Effects of Spirulina Supplementation on Cardiometabolic Risk Factors: A Narrative Review,” Journal of Dietary Supplements 21, no. 4 (2024): 527–542, 10.1080/19390211.2023.2301366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86. Jazinaki M. S., Rashidmayvan M., Rahbarinejad P., Moghadam M. R. S. F., and Pahlavani N., “Effects of Spirulina Supplementation on C‐Reactive Protein (CRP): A Systematic Review and Dose–Response Meta‐Analysis,” Food Science & Nutrition 13, no. 5 (2025): 70196, 10.1002/fsn3.70196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87. AlFadhly N. K. Z., Alhelfi N., Altemimi A. B., Verma D. K., Cacciola F., and Narayanankutty A., “Trends and Technological Advancements in the Possible Food Applications of Spirulina and Their Health Benefits: A Review,” Molecules 27, no. 17 (2022): 5584–5584, 10.3390/molecules27175584. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88. Villalpando D. M., Verdasco‐Martín C. M., Plaza I., et al., “Beneficial Effects of Spirulina Aqueous Extract on Vasodilator Function of Arteries From Hypertensive Rats,” International Journal of Vascular Medicine 2020 (2020): 1–9, 10.1155/2020/6657077. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89. Machowiec P., Ręka G., Maksymowicz M., Piecewicz‐Szczęsna H., and Smoleń A., “Effect of Spirulina Supplementation on Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure: Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials,” Nutrients 13, no. 9 (2021): 3054–3054, 10.3390/nu13093054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90. Shiri H., Sharahi J. Y., Sani M. A., et al., “The Effect of Spirulina Supplementation on Blood Pressure in Adults: A GRADE‐Assessed Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials,” Phytotherapy Research 39, no. 1 (2025): 397–412, 10.1002/ptr.8377. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91. Szulinska M., Gibas‐Dorna M., Miller‐Kasprzak E., et al., “Spirulina Maxima Improves Insulin Sensitivity, Lipid Profile, and Total Antioxidant Status in Obese Patients With Well‐Treated Hypertension: A Randomized Double‐Blind Placebo‐Controlled Study,” European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences 21, no. 10 (2017): 2473–2481. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92. O'Donnell J. A., Zheng T., Meric G., and Marques F. Z., “The Gut Microbiome and Hypertension,” Nature Reviews Nephrology 19, no. 3 (2023): 153–167, 10.1038/s41581-022-00654-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93. Yang Z., Wang Q., Liu Y., et al., “Gut Microbiota and Hypertension: Association, Mechanisms and Treatment,” Clinical and Experimental Hypertension 45, no. 1 (2023): 2195135, 10.1080/10641963.2023.2195135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94. Yuan L., Li Y., Chen M., et al., “Effects of Probiotics on Hypertension,” Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 107, no. 4 (2023): 1107–1117, 10.1007/s00253-023-12369-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95. Gómez‐Guzmán M., Toral M., Romero M., et al., “Antihypertensive Effects of Probiotics Lactobacillus Strains in Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats,” Molecular Nutrition & Food Research 59, no. 11 (2015): 2326–2336, 10.1002/mnfr.201500290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96. Silva‐Cutini M. A., Almeida S. A., Nascimento A. M., et al., “Long‐Term Treatment With Kefir Probiotics Ameliorates Cardiac Function in Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats,” Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry 66 (2019): 79–85, 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2019.01.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97. Robles‐Vera I., Toral M., de la Visitación N., et al., “Probiotics Prevent Dysbiosis and the Rise in Blood Pressure in Genetic Hypertension: Role of Short‐Chain Fatty Acids,” Molecular Nutrition & Food Research 64, no. 6 (2020): 1900616, 10.1002/mnfr.201900616. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98. Wang X.‐L., Chen W.‐J., Jin R., et al., “Engineered Probiotics Clostridium Butyricum ‐pMTL007‐GLP ‐1 Improves Blood Pressure via Producing GLP ‐1 and Modulating Gut Microbiota in Spontaneous Hypertension Rat Models,” Microbial Biotechnology 16, no. 4 (2022): 799–812, 10.1111/1751-7915.14196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99. Luo X., Han Z., Kong Q., Wang Y., Mou H., and Duan X., “Clostridium Butyricum Prevents Dysbiosis and the Rise in Blood Pressure in Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24, no. 5 (2023): 4955–4955, 10.3390/ijms24054955. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100. Huang Y., Wang F., Gong W., and Chen Y., “PPAR Beta/Gamma Mediates the Antihypertensive Activity of a Synbiotic Preparation of Bifidobacterium Lactis and Lactobacillus Acidophilus in Spontaneous Hypertensive Rats,” Heliyon 10, no. 16 (2024): e36157, 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101. Mizher H. A. A., Noor M. I. H. M., and Zaini S., “Natural Remedies for Hypertension: A Systematic Review,” Pharmacological Research—Natural Products 6 (2025): 100145, 10.1016/j.prenap.2025.100145. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 102. Serrano J. C. E., Castro‐Boqué E., García‐Carrasco A., et al., “Antihypertensive Effects of an Optimized Aged Garlic Extract in Subjects With Grade I Hypertension and Antihypertensive Drug Therapy: A Randomized, Triple‐Blind Controlled Trial,” Nutrients 15, no. 17 (2023): 3691–3691, 10.3390/nu15173691. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103. Martelli A., Citi V., and Calderone V., “Vascular Effects of H2S‐Donors: Fluorimetric Detection of H2S Generation and Ion Channel Activation in Human Aortic Smooth Muscle Cells,” in Vascular Effects of Hydrogen Sulfide: Methods and Protocols, ed. Beltowski J. (Springer New York, 2019), 79–87, 10.1007/978-1-4939-9528-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104. Piragine E., Citi V., Lawson K., Calderone V., and Martelli A., “Regulation of Blood Pressure by Natural Sulfur Compounds: Focus on Their Mechanisms of Action,” Biochemical Pharmacology 206 (2022): 115302–115302, 10.1016/j.bcp.2022.115302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105. Baik J., Min J., Ju S., et al., “Effects of Fermented Garlic Extract Containing Nitric Oxide Metabolites on Blood Flow in Healthy Participants: A Randomized Controlled Trial,” Nutrients 14, no. 24 (2022): 5238–5238, 10.3390/nu14245238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106. Sleiman C., Daou R.‐M., Al Hazzouri A., et al., “Garlic and Hypertension: Efficacy, Mechanism of Action, and Clinical Implications,” Nutrients 16, no. 17 (2024): 2895–2895, 10.3390/nu16172895. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107. Saadh M. J., Kariem M., Shukla M., et al., “RETRACTED: Effects of Aged Garlic Extract on Blood Pressure in Hypertensive Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials,” Prostaglandins & Other Lipid Mediators 175 (2024): 106914–106914, 10.1016/j.prostaglandins.2024.106914. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108. Chen D., Tang J., Gong T., et al., “Short‐Term Effects of Modest Salt Reduction Combined With DASH Diet on Changing Salt Eating Habits in Hypertensive Patients With Type II Diabetes,” Clinical and Experimental Hypertension 44, no. 6 (2022): 514–522, 10.1080/10641963.2022.2079666. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109. Ju Y., Zhang C., Zhang Z., et al., “Effect of Dietary Fiber (Oat Bran) Supplement in Heart Rate Lowering in Patients With Hypertension: A Randomized DASH‐Diet‐Controlled Clinical Trial,” Nutrients 14, no. 15 (2022): 3148–3148, 10.3390/nu14153148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110. Vasei M. H., Hosseinpour‐Niazi S., Ainy E., and Mirmiran P., “Effect of Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) Diet, High in Animal or Plant Protein on Cardiometabolic Risk Factors in Obese Metabolic Syndrome Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial,” Primary Care Diabetes 16, no. 5 (2022): 634–639, 10.1016/j.pcd.2022.09.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111. Belanger M. J., Kovell L. C., Turkson‐Ocran R.‐A., et al., “Effects of the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension Diet on Change in Cardiac Biomarkers Over Time: Results From the DASH‐Sodium Trial,” Journal of the American Heart Association 12, no. 2 (2023): 026684, 10.1161/JAHA.122.026684. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112. Saslow L. R., Jones L. M., Sen A., et al., “Comparing Very Low‐Carbohydrate vs DASH Diets for Overweight or Obese Adults With Hypertension and Prediabetes or Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Trial,” Annals of Family Medicine 21, no. 3 (2023): 256–263, 10.1370/afm.2968. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113. Zou Y., Tang J., Zhang F., et al., “Effect of Low‐Sodium Salt Applied to Chinese Modified DASH Diet on Arterial Stiffness in Older Patients With Hypertension and Type 2 Diabetes,” Nutrición Hospitalaria 40, no. 5 (2023): 967–974, 10.20960/nh.04622. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114. de Oliveira V. L. P., Freitas M. M., de Paula T. P., et al., “DASH Diet vs. DASH Diet Plus Physical Activity in Older Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and High Blood Pressure: A Randomized Clinical Trial,” Nutrition and Health 30, no. 2 (2024): 389–398, 10.1177/02601060221124201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115. Sangouni A. A., Hosseinzadeh M., and Parastouei K., “The Effect of Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) Diet on Fatty Liver and Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Subjects With Metabolic Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Trial,” BMC Endocrine Disorders 24, no. 1 (2024): 126–126, 10.1186/s12902-024-01661-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116. Çapar A. G. and Yilmaz M., “Which Is More Effective in Hypertension? Salt‐Free Diet vs DASH Diet,” Medicine 104, no. 10 (2025): e41636–e41636, 10.1097/MD.0000000000041636. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117. Liebman S. E., Baran A., Barnett T. D., et al., “The Effects of a Whole‐Food Plant‐Based Nutrition Education Program on Blood Pressure and Potassium in Chronic Kidney Disease: A Proof‐of‐Concept Study,” Nutrients 17, no. 5 (2025): 779–779, 10.3390/nu17050779. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118. Marhuenda J., Pérez‐Piñero S., Arcusa R., et al., “A Randomized, Double‐Blind, Placebo‐Controlled Trial to Determine the Effectiveness of a Polyphenolic Extract (Hibiscus sabdariffa and Lippia citriodora) for Reducing Blood Pressure in Prehypertensive and Type 1 Hypertensive Subjects,” Molecules 26, no. 6 (2021): 1783–1783, 10.3390/molecules26061783. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119. Vors C., Rancourt‐Bouchard M., Couillard C., Gigleux I., Couture P., and Lamarche B., “Sex May Modulate the Effects of Combined Polyphenol Extract and L‐Citrulline Supplementation on Ambulatory Blood Pressure in Adults With Prehypertension: A Randomized Controlled Trial,” Nutrients 13, no. 2 (2021): 399–399, 10.3390/nu13020399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120. Le Sayec M., Xu Y., Laiola M., et al., “The Effects of Aronia Berry (Poly)Phenol Supplementation on Arterial Function and the Gut Microbiome in Middle Aged Men and Women: Results From a Randomized Controlled Trial,” Clinical Nutrition 41, no. 11 (2022): 2549–2561, 10.1016/j.clnu.2022.08.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121. Sangouni A. A., Taghdir M., Mirahmadi J., Sepandi M., and Parastouei K., “Effects of Curcumin and/or Coenzyme Q10 Supplementation on Metabolic Control in Subjects With Metabolic Syndrome: A Randomized Clinical Trial,” Nutrition Journal 21, no. 1 (2022): 62–62, 10.1186/s12937-022-00816-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122. Taladrid D., Celis M., Belda I., Bartolomé B., and Moreno‐Arribas M. V., “Hypertension‐ and Glycaemia‐Lowering Effects of a Grape‐Pomace‐Derived Seasoning in High‐Cardiovascular Risk and Healthy Subjects. Interplay With the Gut Microbiome,” Food & Function 13, no. 4 (2022): 2068–2082, 10.1039/D1FO03942C. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123. Tucci M., Del Bo' C., Martini D., et al., “A Serving of Blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum) Improves Peripheral Vascular Function but Not Metabolic and Functional Markers in Older Subjects: A Randomized, Controlled, Crossover Study,” Food Research International 197 (2024): 115189–115189, 10.1016/j.foodres.2024.115189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124. Soleimani D., Moosavian S. P., Zolfaghari H., and Paknahad Z., “Effect of Garlic Powder Supplementation on Blood Pressure and hs‐C‐Reactive Protein Among Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Patients: A Randomized, Double‐Blind, Placebo‐Controlled Trial,” Food Science & Nutrition 9, no. 7 (2021): 3556–3562, 10.1002/fsn3.2307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125. Fogacci F., Micoli A. D., Grandi E., Fiorini G., Borghi C., and Cicero A. F. G., “Black Garlic and Pomegranate Standardized Extracts for Blood Pressure Improvement: A Non‐Randomized Diet‐Controlled Study,” Applied Sciences 12, no. 19 (2022): 9673–9673, 10.3390/app12199673. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 126. Mohammadi S., Mazloomi S. M., Niakousari M., et al., “Evaluating the Effects of Dark Chocolate Formulated With Micro‐Encapsulated Fermented Garlic Extract on Cardio‐Metabolic Indices in Hypertensive Patients: A Crossover, Triple‐Blind Placebo‐Controlled Randomized Clinical Trial,” Phytotherapy Research 36, no. 4 (2022): 1785–1796, 10.1002/ptr.7421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127. Houston M., Chen C., D'Adamo C. R., Papathanassiu A. E., and Green S. J., “Effects of S‐Allylcysteine‐Rich Garlic Extract and Dietary Inorganic Nitrate Formula on Blood Pressure and Salivary Nitric Oxide: An Open‐Label Clinical Trial among Hypertensive Subjects,” Cureus 15, no. 9 (2023): 45369, 10.7759/cureus.45369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128. Rahmatinia E., Amidi B., Naderi N., et al., “Randomized, Double‐Blind Clinical Trial Evaluating the Impact of Freeze‐Dried Garlic Extract Capsules on Blood Pressure, Lipid Profile, and Nitric Oxide Levels in Individuals at Risk for Hypertension,” Hormone Molecular Biology and Clinical Investigation 45, no. 4 (2024): 139–147, 10.1515/hmbci-2024-0019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.
