Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2026 Oct 12;21(10):e0360401. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0360401

Menstrual health challenges and associated barriers among tribal adolescent girls in India: A systematic review

Rohit Raj 1, Jarina Begum 1,*, Syed Irfan Ali 1, Manasee Panda 2, Vani Lakshmi R 3
Editor: Alison Parker4
PMCID: PMC13657302  PMID: 42862827

Abstract

Introduction

Menstrual health is a critical yet neglected public health issue among tribal adolescent girls in India, influenced by socio-cultural, economic, and infrastructural determinants. This review aimed to explore the key menstrual health challenges, barriers, and associated outcomes among tribal adolescent girls in India.

Methods

This systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA 2020 guidelines. A comprehensive literature search was performed across PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar for studies published between January 2015 and March 2026. Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methods studies focusing on menstrual health among tribal adolescent girls in India were included. Study selection, data extraction, and quality appraisal were conducted independently by multiple reviewers. Methodological quality was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) tools. Due to heterogeneity, a narrative synthesis approach was adopted.

Results

Out of 197 identified records, 28 studies met the inclusion criteria. The findings reveal significant disparities in menstrual health management driven by socioeconomic status, education, cultural taboos, and infrastructural limitations. Key challenges included limited access to sanitary products, inadequate WASH facilities, and poor awareness. Cultural stigma and restrictive practices contributed to psychological distress and unsafe hygiene behaviours. These barriers were associated with adverse outcomes such as reproductive tract infections and increased school absenteeism. The quality appraisal indicated overall moderate to high methodological rigour, with most studies demonstrating acceptable quality despite some limitations related to study design and reporting.

Conclusion

Menstrual health among tribal adolescent girls remains a significant public health concern in India. Addressing these challenges requires integrated, culturally sensitive interventions focusing on education, improved infrastructure, and equitable access to menstrual health services to enhance health outcomes and well-being.

Introduction

Menstrual health is an essential aspect of adolescent well-being, but remains a neglected public health issue, especially in the case of marginalised populations like tribal adolescent girls in India. Menstruation is not just a biological process but also a socio-cultural phenomenon influenced by taboos, stigma, and lack of awareness. Challenges related to menstrual health management in tribal adolescent girls emanate from various barriers, including limited access to sanitary products, inadequate menstrual hygiene facilities, social taboos, and inadequate comprehensive education regarding reproductive health [1]. These barriers have to be dealt with in order to improve the health, education, and dignity of tribal adolescent girls in India. Tribal communities constitute 8.6% of India’s total population and mostly live in geographically isolated, socioeconomically poor conditions. The largest concentrations of Indigenous Peoples are found in the seven states of north-east India, and the so-called “central tribal belt” stretching from Rajasthan to West Bengal [2]. In these communities, Menstrual practices are influenced by local cultural beliefs and traditions, including restrictions on religious or social activities, limited discussion of menstruation, and the use of locally available materials when sanitary products are difficult to access or afford. Poverty, distance from markets and health facilities, and limited awareness can further contribute to inadequate menstrual hygiene practices and delayed treatment-seeking. Poor menstrual hygiene has been known to contribute to RTIs and other health problems, hence influencing the general health and school attendance of girls [3]. For example, among the Juang, a Particularly Vulnerable Tribal Group in Odisha, the cost and distance from markets were reported as barriers to sanitary-pad use, while cultural restrictions during menstruation were common and treatment-seeking for menstrual problems was low. These overlapping cultural, economic, and healthcare barriers highlight the need for interventions that are locally appropriate and sensitive to the specific circumstances of tribal communities [4].

Menstrual health management among tribal adolescent girls faces several challenges and barriers that impact their overall well-being, education, and social participation. A major issue is the lack of awareness and education about menstruation, leading to fear, anxiety, and misinformation. Limited reproductive health education in schools and cultural taboos within families further restrict open discussions, resulting in unsafe menstrual practices. Social stigma and cultural taboos also play a significant role in shaping negative perceptions of menstruation, often imposing restrictions on movement, religious participation, and diet. This stigma discourages girls from seeking support and essential resources. Additionally, access to sanitary products remains a significant challenge due to economic constraints and unavailability in remote areas, forcing many girls to rely on unhygienic alternatives, increasing their risk of infections. The absence of adequate water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) facilities further complicates menstrual hygiene management, contributing to school absenteeism and, in some cases, dropouts. Education is directly affected, as many girls miss school due to fear of leakage, lack of privacy, and inadequate menstrual hygiene facilities, widening gender disparities in literacy and future employment opportunities [5].

The Government of India has implemented several programmes to improve menstrual health and hygiene among adolescent girls. These include the Menstrual Hygiene Scheme (MHS) under the National Health Mission, which promotes menstrual hygiene awareness, access to sanitary products, and safe disposal among adolescent girls. The National Menstrual Hygiene Policy for School-Going Girls, provides a broader framework for access to menstrual hygiene products, menstrual health education, gender-responsive sanitation facilities, and environmentally safe disposal of menstrual waste [6]. In relation to tribal communities, broader tribal-focused programmes also have relevance to menstrual health. The Pradhan Mantri Janjati Adivasi Nyaya Maha Abhiyan (PM-JANMAN) was introduced for Particularly Vulnerable Tribal Groups (PVTGs) and includes interventions related to health and nutrition, safe drinking water, sanitation, education, housing, connectivity, and livelihoods [7]. Similarly, the Dharti Aaba Janjatiya Gram Utkarsh Abhiyan (DA-JGUA) aims to address infrastructure and human-development gaps in tribal-majority villages, including improving access to health, education, Anganwadi services, and livelihood opportunities [8]. Although PM-JANMAN and DA-JGUA are not specifically menstrual-health programmes, their focus on health, water, sanitation, education, and access to essential services is directly relevant to the barriers affecting menstrual health and hygiene among tribal adolescent girls. However, geographical remoteness, poverty, cultural beliefs, and limited healthcare infrastructure may affect the reach and effective implementation of these programmes among tribal adolescent girls. Therefore, understanding the specific barriers faced by these communities is important for developing more equitable and context-specific menstrual health interventions.

Furthermore, insufficient healthcare support and ineffective policy implementation in tribal areas limit access to gynaecological care and menstrual health education. While government schemes aim to address these issues, their reach and execution remain inadequate. Strengthening healthcare outreach, improving infrastructure, and integrating menstrual health education into primary healthcare services are crucial to overcoming these barriers. The objective of this review is to explore the key menstrual health challenges, barriers, and associated outcomes among tribal adolescent girls in India.

Materials and methods

This systematic review is registered in PROSPERO with registration no: PROSPERO 2026 CRD420261369097.

This systematic review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA 2020) guidelines. The detailed PRISMA checklist were followed and it is mentioned in the supporting file (S1 PRISMA Checklist).

Research Question based on the PICO Framework), Population (P): Tribal adolescent girls in India, Exposure (I): Menstrual health challenges and barriers, Comparison (C): Not applicable, and Outcome (O): Menstrual hygiene practices, health outcomes, and associated determinants.

Research question

What are the key menstrual health challenges and associated outcomes among tribal adolescent girls in India?

Search strategy

A search strategy was developed in consultation with subject experts and refined iteratively to ensure sensitivity and specificity. The search strategy used the PICO framework, focusing on tribal adolescent girls in India and their menstrual health challenges. A comprehensive and systematic search was conducted across multiple electronic databases, including PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar. Key search terms related to menstrual health (such as “menstrual hygiene,” “menstrual health,” and “menstrual hygiene management”), population (such as “adolescent girls,” “adolescent,” and “teenagers”), and tribal Indian context (including “tribal,” “scheduled tribe,” “indigenous”, India, “North India”, “South India”, “East India”, and “West India”) were identified and combined using Boolean operators (AND, OR) to enhance sensitivity and specificity. Database-specific subject headings, including MeSH terms in PubMed, were incorporated where applicable. Grey literature was also explored by screening the first three pages of Google Scholar. Additionally, reference lists of included studies and relevant reviews were manually screened to identify any further eligible articles. The search was limited to studies published in English between January 2015 and March 2026. A preliminary search was done in PubMed, followed by Scopus. Details of the search strategy are mentioned in Table 1. The search strategy using Boolean operators OR & AND, databases included PubMed, Scopus and grey literature (Google Scholar).

Table 1. Search strategy using Boolean operators OR & AND, databases included PubMed, Scopus and grey literature (Google scholar).

Database Population (P) Exposure (I) Comparison (C) Outcome (O)
PubMed “Adolescent”[MeSH], “Adolescent Health”[MeSH], “Students”[MeSH], girls, “Adolescent girls,” “Teenage girls,” youths, “Indigenous Peoples”[MeSH], Trib*, tribal, native, “Scheduled Tribes,” India “Menstruation”[MeSH], “Menstrual Hygiene”[MeSH], “Hygiene”[MeSH], “Sanitary Napkins”[MeSH], “Menstrual Hygiene Products,” “Reproductive Health”[MeSH], “Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice”[MeSH], menstrual health, periods Not Applicable “Health Status”[MeSH], “Reproductive Tract Infections”[MeSH], “Menstrual Cycle Disorders”[MeSH], “Dysmenorrhea”[MeSH], “Premenstrual Syndrome”[MeSH], school absenteeism, awareness, accessibility, hygiene practices
Scopus “Adolescent girls” OR “Teenage girls” OR girls OR youths AND Trib* OR Indigenous OR Native AND India OR “South India” OR “North India” OR “West India” OR “East India” OR “North East India” OR “East Central India” OR “Union territories” “Menstrual Health” OR Menstruation OR “Menstrual Hygiene” OR Periods OR “Sanitary pads” OR “Sanitary napkins” AND Challenges OR Barriers OR Hurdles OR Obstacles OR Issues OR Complications OR Difficulties Not Applicable Menstrual hygiene practices, health outcomes, awareness, accessibility, school absenteeism
Google Scholar “Adolescent girls” OR “Teenage girls” OR girls OR youths AND Trib* OR Indigenous OR Native AND India OR “South India” OR “North India” OR “West India” OR “East India” OR “North East India” OR “East Central India” OR “Union territories” “Menstrual Health” OR Menstruation OR “Menstrual Hygiene” OR Periods OR “Sanitary pads” OR “Sanitary napkins” AND Challenges OR Barriers OR Hurdles OR Obstacles OR Issues OR Complications OR Difficulties Not Applicable Menstrual hygiene practices, health outcomes, awareness, accessibility, school absenteeism

Eligibility criteria

Studies were selected based on predefined eligibility criteria. Both quantitative study designs, including cross-sectional, interventional, and randomised controlled trials, as well as qualitative approaches such as focus group discussions, in-depth interviews, and perspective-based studies, were included to ensure a comprehensive understanding of the research topic. Grey literature was also considered by screening the first three pages of Google Scholar, and relevant references cited within systematic reviews were examined for additional eligible studies.

Studies that did not report primary data, such as editorials, narrative reviews, and abstracts without full-text availability, were excluded. Only articles published in the English language were considered. To enhance the completeness of the search, the reference lists of all included studies and relevant reviews were manually screened to identify any additional studies that may have been missed during database searching.

The review was restricted to studies published between January 2015 and March 2025, as this period follows the implementation of the Rashtriya Kishori Swasthya Karyakram (RKSK) in 2014, which marked a significant policy shift in prioritising menstrual health within adolescent healthcare in India.

Study selection

With the help of keywords, citations were retrieved and imported to the Rayyan software [9]. A systematic review web-based management system [10]. Titles and abstracts screening was done by the three reviewers, RR, JB, and SIA, independently. In case of any discrepancy, opinion was taken from the fourth reviewer, SIA. Full text screening followed by the development of a data extraction sheet was done independently by three reviewers, RR, JB, and MP, of the studies retrieved from the title/abstract screening. The included studies underwent charting of the data for the final review. Reporting details are mentioned in a PRISMA 2020 flowchart (Fig 1) [11]. Studies were included based on the inclusion criteria. Table 2: Data reporting chart depicting author/year, title of the study, population, study design, and outcome.

Fig 1. PRISMA 2020 flowchart.

Fig 1

Table 2. Data reporting chart depicting author/year, title of the study, population, study design, and outcome.

Sl.No. Author, year Title of the Study Population Study region Exposure (I) Outcome Quality Assessment as per JBI format (paper included: Yes/No)
1 Chauhan, S. et al, 2016 Examining the predictors of use of sanitary napkins among adolescent girls: A multi-level

approach
Adolescent girls (10–19 years) Uttar Pradesh, Bihar Socio-demographic factors, education, and access to sanitary napkins Use of Sanitary Napkins Moderate (Yes)
2 Sharma, S. et al, 2021 Comparing Reproductive Health Awareness, Nutrition, and Hygiene among Early and Late Adolescents from Marginalised Populations of India: A Community-Based Cross-Sectional Survey Adolescent girls (10–19 years) East, West, North, South, and Central India Socioeconomic status, nutrition, and hygiene awareness Unsafe practising Moderate (Yes)
3 Gold-Watts, A et al, 2020 A qualitative study of adolescent girls’ experiences of menarche and menstruation in rural Tamil Nadu, India Adolescent girls (10–19 years) Tamil Nadu Cultural beliefs, experiences of menarche Positive experience, Distressing experience, restriction High

(Yes)
4 Anand, E et al, 2015 Menstrual hygiene practices and its association with reproductive tract infections and abnormal vaginal discharge among women in India Female age group 15–49 years 28 states and 6 union territories Menstrual hygiene practices Safe practise High

(Yes)
5 Chattopadhyay, A et al, 2019 WASH practices and its association with nutritional status of adolescent girls in

poverty pockets of eastern India
Adolescent girls (10–19 years) Bihar, Odisha, and Chhattisgarh WASH practices, poverty Unsafe practising (no use of sanitary napkins) Moderate

(Yes)
6 Singh, A et al, 2022 Menstrual hygiene practices

among adolescent women in rural India: a cross-sectional study
Women of reproductive age group (15–49 years) 28 states and 7 union territories Education, socioeconomic status Less education less menstrual hygiene practises

High (Yes)
7. D. A. Tan et al, 2017 Cultural aspects and mythologies surrounding

menstruation and abnormal uterine bleeding
Women of reproductive age group (14–45 years) Round the world, including India Cultural beliefs, myths Lack of awareness of menstrual hygiene Moderate (Yes)
8. Kathuria, B et al, 2018 Effects of Socio-Economic Conditions on Usage of Hygienic Method of Menstrual Protection among Young Women in EAG States of India Women (15–24 Years) Empowered Action Group States (EAG), India Socioeconomic conditions, caste Lack of Menstrual Protection among Schedule caste Moderate (Yes)
9. Kumari, S et al, 20211 Knowledge and practices related to menstruation among tribal adolescent girls 3-18 years adolescent girls Munda tribe, Khunti, Jharkhand Knowledge sources (mother, peers) Aware of Menstrual hygiene through mother & friends Moderate (Yes)
10. Bhagwat, A et al, A Psychosocial Lens on an Indigenous Initiative to Address Menstrual Health and Hygiene in Indian Villages School adolescent girls Gujarat Psychosocial and community interventions

Poor menstrual hygiene practices Moderate

(Yes)
11. Ram, U et al, 2020 Factors Associated with Disposable Menstrual Absorbent Use Among Young Women in India

15-24 Years age group women India Socioeconomic status, caste SC/ST have low use of absorbent napkins High (Yes)
12. Sakshi, S et al, 2024 Examining the impact of socioeconomic and demographic factors on women’s health: A survey-based study of menstrual hygiene, pregnancy, and post-pregnancy care in the Gonds Tribe of Sonbhadra, Uttar Pradesh Female 15–60 years Gonda tribe, Sonbhadra, Uttar Pradesh Socioeconomic & demographic factor Use of Cotton clothes Moderate

(Yes)
13. P, Aparnavi et al, 2024

Suitability, acceptability, feasibility of modern menstrual methods: a qualitative study in Coimbatore district, Tamil Nadu, India 15-49 Years women Tamil Nadu, India Acceptability of menstrual products Use of cotton clothes by tribal women High (Yes)







14. Panda, N et al, 2024 Menstrual health and hygiene amongst adolescent girls and women of reproductive age: a study of practices and predictors, Odisha, India 10-49 years female Odisha, India Caste, awareness, socioeconomic factors Menstrual hygiene awareness is more in the General caste High (Yes)

15. Thakur, J et al, 2020 Understanding menstrual characteristics from the perspective of reproductive energetics: a study on the adolescent Oraon tribal populations 10-19 years adolescent girls Oraon tribes, Jalpaiguri, West Bengal Biological and cultural factors

Irregularity in periods Moderate (Yes)
16. Vayeda, M et al, 2021 Improving menstrual hygiene management among adolescent girls in tribal areas of Gujarat: an evaluation of an implementation model integrating the government service delivery system Adolescent girls 10–19 years Narmada district, Gujarat, India Intervention (government service delivery model) Safe Menstrual hygiene methods High (Yes)
17. Bhoi, N et al, 2024 Health status of particularly vulnerable tribal groups (PVTGs) of Odisha: a narrative review Any age group and gender Odisha, India General tribal health determinants Use of old clothes Low (No)
18. Chatterjee, R et al, 2024 Menstrual disorders and associated factors among rural and tribal adolescent girls in India: A systematic review and meta-analysis 10-19 years adolescent girls India Multiple determinants (taboos, lifestyle) Social taboos, lack of physical activities, and menstrual irregularities. Low (No)
19. Mudi, K, P et al, 2023 Menstrual health and hygiene among Juang women: a particularly vulnerable tribal group in Odisha, India Married women 15–49 age group, Keonjhar district of Odisha, India Cultural practices, socioeconomic status Use of old clothes Moderate (Yes)
20. Karjee, S et al, 2023 Contextualizing the socio-economic and spatial patterns of using menstrual hygienic methods among young women (15–24 years) in India: A cross-sectional study using the nationally representative survey Young women 15–24 years Assam, Bihar, Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand, Madhya Pradesh, and Rajasthan Wealth, autonomy, social media exposure Safe Menstrual hygiene method, awareness through mass social media, autonomy, and household wealth. High (Yes)
21. Meher, T et al, 2023 Dynamics of usage of menstrual hygiene and unhygienic methods among young women in India: a spatial analysis 15-24 Year age group India Spatial and socioeconomic factors Unsafe menstrual hygiene practice. High (Yes)
22. Vishwakarma, D et al, 2021 Interlinking menstrual hygiene with Women’s empowerment and reproductive tract infections: Evidence from India 15-24 Year age group India Empowerment, hygiene practices Utilisation of hygienic method High (Yes)
23. Babbar, K et al, 2024 Bleeding at the Margins: Understanding Period Poverty among SC and ST Women Using Decomposition Analysis 15-24 years India Caste-based inequality, economic status Inequalities in period products High (Yes)
24. Agarwal, V et al, 2017 Menstrual Hygiene: Knowledge and Practice among Adolescent Girls of Rural Sabarkantha District 13-18 years adolescent girls Sabarkantha, Maharashtra Knowledge and awareness Safe hygiene practice Moderate (Yes)
25. Borkar, SK et al, 2022 Study of Menstrual Hygiene Practices Among Adolescent Girls in a Tribal Area of Central India 10-19 years Nagpur, Maharashtra Cultural beliefs, awareness Awared, safe hygiene practices, and cultural beliefs Moderate (Yes)
26. Kakeri, M et al, 2018 Knowledge and Practice Gap for Menstrual Hygiene among Adolescent School Girls of the Tribal District of Maharashtra, India: A Cross-Sectional Study Adolescent girls, 12–16 years Palghar, Maharashtra Knowledge gap, education Need awareness Moderate (Yes)
27. Udayar, ES et al, 2022 Prevalence and Predictors of Dysmenorrhea and its Impact on Quality of Life among Tribal Adolescent Girls in India Adolescent girls 10–19 years Chittoor, Andhra Pradesh Dysmenorrhea predictors (biological, lifestyle) School absenteeism High (Yes)
28. Raj, R et al, 2026 Multi-stakeholder perspectives on reproductive and adolescent healthcare schemes in tribal regions of India: A qualitative study

Adolescent girls & tribal women in the reproductive age group 10–49 years East Singhbhum, Jharkhand Barriers and enablers in reproductive and adolescent healthcare delivery (e.g., awareness, infrastructure, governance, cultural practices) Low awareness of schemes, absenteeism of healthcare workers, inadequate infrastructure, cultural reliance on traditional medicine, financial and transport barriers, delayed incentives, limited use of health technology; enablers include community support, supervision, and NGO collaboration High (Yes)

Data extraction

A standardised data extraction form was developed and utilised to collect relevant information from each included study systematically. This included key study characteristics such as the year of publication, geographical location, and study design, along with details of the study sample, including population characteristics and sample size. Additionally, important findings related to menstrual health, including identified challenges, practices, and associated factors, were extracted to facilitate comprehensive analysis and synthesis. Data extraction was done by RR, JB, and VLR.

Quality synthesis

The methodological quality of the included studies was evaluated using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal tools, with specific checklists applied according to the respective study designs. This assessment enabled a systematic evaluation of potential biases and overall study rigour. Based on the appraisal outcomes, studies were classified into three categories: low risk of bias, moderate risk of bias, and high risk of bias, to ensure transparency and reliability in the synthesis of evidence. Two researchers RR and VLR did the synthesis, conflicts were resolved by the third researcher MP. A detailed characteristics and quality synthesis of the studies are mentioned in the supporting file (S2 Data extraction sheet in S1 PRISMA Checklist).

Data synthesis

Due to the substantial heterogeneity observed across the included studies in terms of study designs, populations, outcome measures, and reported variables, a meta-analysis was not considered appropriate. Instead, a narrative thematic synthesis approach was adopted to systematically integrate and interpret the findings. Initially, data extracted from individual studies were organised and summarised in tabular form to facilitate comparison. Subsequently, an inductive approach was used to identify recurring patterns, concepts, and relationships within the data.

The findings were then grouped into key thematic domains, such as socioeconomic determinants, cultural barriers, accessibility of menstrual products, health risks, regional disparities, and school-related outcomes. These themes were developed through an iterative process involving multiple reviewers to enhance consistency and reduce subjective bias. Where appropriate, results from quantitative and qualitative studies were triangulated to provide a more comprehensive understanding of menstrual health challenges among tribal adolescent girls. This approach allowed for the synthesis of diverse evidence while preserving the contextual richness of individual studies.

Results

A total of 197 retrievals were identified through database searching alone: PubMed-34, Scopus-133, and Google Scholar-30. Following the screening process, a total of 28 eligible studies were included in the synthesis. The detailed study selection is depicted in the PRISMA-SR flowchart, Fig 1: PRISMA 2020 flowchart [11]. The following themes were generated from the evidence shown in Fig 2: Six themes generated from the evidences.

Fig 2. Six themes generated from the evidences.

Fig 2

  • 1. Socioeconomic and demographic determinants:

The more educated the adolescent girl and her mother, the higher the use of sanitary napkins. Wealth and economic status, such as those from richer households, are significantly more likely to use sanitary pads than those from poorer households. Exposure to social media is a determinant of menstrual hygiene practice, making sanitary napkin use more likely. Caste and Social Stratification reported that Scheduled Tribe (ST) and Scheduled Caste (SC) women have lower odds of using hygienic menstrual methods compared to General category women. Sanitary napkin use is more prevalent in urban areas than in rural areas. Low awareness of health schemes, including menstrual health, language barriers, and poor outreach in tribal communities, further exacerbate these socioeconomic disparities, limiting access to menstrual health information and services.

  • 2. Cultural/barriers, practices and taboos

There are some restrictions on family contact or religious activities, cooking, and not entering temples during menstruation. Menstruation-Based Fears and Anxiety, myths of attracting wild animals and ghosts possessing the woman while menstruating, cause psychological suffering, an initiatory rite and a social experience at menarche. In a few communities, menarche is observed through initiation rituals, and this rite brings support for social constructs like gender, even showing that the girl is now ready for marriage.

  • 3. Accessibility and affordability of menstrual products

Many women, particularly in tribal and economically weaker sections, find sanitary pads unaffordable and continue to use cloth. Limited market access, such as distance from markets, restricts access to menstrual hygiene products, especially in remote tribal areas. Government and NGO interventions, including kishori group meetings and school-based awareness programs, have been effective in improving menstrual hygiene knowledge and practices.

  • 4. Health risks associated with unhygienic practices

The use of unhygienic absorbents is associated with RTIs and other menstrual health problems. The impact of sanitation facilities, with the availability of household toilets, enhances the use of sanitary menstrual practices. Nutritional and lifestyle factors: intake of diet, BMI, and physical activity have been related to menstrual disorders like dysmenorrhea and premenstrual syndrome (PMS).

  • 5. Regional & geographic variations

The included studies represented diverse geographical settings across India, including Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, Jharkhand, Odisha, Chhattisgarh, Gujarat, Maharashtra, Tamil Nadu, Andhra Pradesh, West Bengal, and Assam, as well as studies using nationally representative datasets. The evidence therefore covered both eastern, central and populations from northern, western, southern, and northeastern India. Considerable geographical variation was observed in menstrual hygiene practices, access to sanitary products, water and sanitation facilities, menstrual knowledge, and healthcare access. Sanitary napkin use was generally higher in southern states, whereas lower levels were reported in northern and central states, including Uttar Pradesh and Bihar.

  • 6. School absenteeism and educational impact

The results indicate that menstrual pain is a major issue among students, with many choosing self-management strategies such as ignoring the pain or taking bed rest. This means that dysmenorrhea might be one of the key reasons for school absenteeism since discomfort may cause the student to avoid going to school. The very low percentage of adolescent girls who report seeking help from teachers (14.7%) may indicate a gap in awareness and support systems within schools regarding menstrual health [12]. This lack of guidance and assistance may further strengthen absenteeism, thus calling for better menstrual health education and support mechanisms in school settings. Inadequate training of frontline workers and a lack of adolescent-friendly services may contribute to insufficient support for menstrual health within educational and community settings.

Quality synthesis

The quality appraisal of the included studies indicates an overall moderate to high methodological rigour across the evidence base. The majority of studies (n = 17) were rated as high quality, demonstrating robust study designs, adequate sample representation, and clear reporting of outcomes, particularly in large-scale cross-sectional and nationally representative analyses. A substantial proportion of studies (n = 10) were assessed as moderate quality, mainly due to limitations such as reliance on self-reported data, restricted geographic coverage, or limited control for confounding variables. Only two studies were rated as low quality and were subsequently excluded from the final synthesis, reflecting concerns related to methodological weaknesses and limited reliability of findings. Overall, the included evidence is reasonably strong, with most studies meeting acceptable quality standards; however, variations in study design, population heterogeneity, and contextual differences across regions should be considered while interpreting the results.

Discussion

Menstrual health management (MHM) remains an important public health and social concern, particularly among adolescent girls and women from marginalised communities in India. The evidence base included in this review, largely comprising moderate to high-quality studies, consistently demonstrates significant disparities in menstrual hygiene. Many studies established the influence of age and educational factors regarding menstrual hygiene practices. A study by Chauhan et al. (2016) conducted among adolescents in Bihar and Uttar Pradesh reported that older adolescents (15–19 years) were more likely to use sanitary napkins than younger adolescents (10–14 years), partly attributed to higher educational attainment [13]. Similarly, Singh et al. (2022) reported that rural girls across India had significantly higher odds of exclusively using hygienic practices [10]. Another study done by Vayeda et al. (2022) concluded that education creates awareness and equips people with the knowledge of making appropriate choices in Gujarat [14]. Moreover, one of the studies stated that only a few girls knew about menstruation before menarche, thus emphasising the need for complete menstrual health education. However, the quality synthesis: moderate-quality studies indicate persistent gaps in awareness. Supporting these studies stated that menstrual awareness before menarche remains low [15,16].

In terms of socioeconomic and caste inequities in menstrual hygiene practices, there was a constant report of caste and socioeconomic status-based inequities in menstrual hygiene practices [17]. Hygienic menstrual methods were found to be used by approximately 77% of women, including adolescent girls in India, though variations exist across the socio-cultural and geographic dimensions. Factors such as education level, social status, and household wealth have a meaningful influence on hygienic menstrual practices. Studies found that girls from non-marginalised groups had a significantly higher odds of practising safe menstrual hygiene than those from Scheduled Castes (SC) and Scheduled Tribes (ST) [18,19]. A similar study by Anand et al. (2025) noted that women from tribal communities in India were more likely to use hygienic methods than SC women [20]. In one of the studies Singh et al. (2022), further reported that few ST women exclusively used hygienic methods compared to women from the general category [10]. This disparity highlights the need for targeted interventions addressing the menstrual health needs of marginalised communities. Studies found that adolescents from SC/ST backgrounds, poorer households, and those without access to water within household premises were significantly less likely to use sanitary napkins [21]. These findings are supported by Kathuria (2021), they reported that adolescents from the wealthiest category were almost eight times more likely to use sanitary methods than those from the poorest category [22]. Similar study found that economic factors, such as bank account ownership and mobile phone usage, influenced the adoption of hygienic menstrual practices. In other studies such as Vishwakarma et al. (2021), Chauhan et al. (2021), and Singh et al. (2022), adolescents with exposure to social media showed a higher preference for sanitary napkins in other studies [10,13,23]. As the study establishes, the social media is a major predictor of menstrual hygiene. Increased access to social media allows for normalisation in the conversation, and it can break the many myths and taboos against menstruation [22]. Educational interventions and improved social media exposure have been linked to better menstrual hygiene practices, though barriers such as affordability, lack of washing facilities, and concerns over waste disposal persist [24]. Addressing these barriers through targeted awareness programs and improved accessibility to hygienic menstrual products is crucial in improving menstrual health outcomes [25].

Community involvement also has a very significant role. Our review showed evidence from high-quality intervention studies demonstrates that leveraging government systems and community platforms improves knowledge and practices. Similarly, another study showed that girls who attended Kishori (adolescent) group meetings had higher odds of using sanitary napkins [21]. Studies also showed that it is possible to improve menstrual health knowledge and practices in tribal communities by using existing government systems. Such findings have underlined the necessity of wide-ranging community education programs to facilitate education on menstrual hygiene [14]. Sanitary pads are the most commonly used method, and cloth remains a popular alternative, especially among tribal women [26].

The findings demonstrate substantial geographical variation in menstrual health challenges among tribal adolescent girls in India. Studies from Uttar Pradesh and Bihar reported comparatively lower use of sanitary napkins and greater barriers related to affordability, access, and menstrual hygiene practices [13,21]. Whereas studies from southern India, particularly Tamil Nadu, indicated relatively higher use of hygienic menstrual products [26,27]. Evidence from eastern and central India, including Odisha, Jharkhand, Chhattisgarh, and West Bengal, further highlighted the influence of cultural practices, limited infrastructure, and restricted access to menstrual health information and services [17,21,28–30]. Studies from Gujarat and Maharashtra also identified gaps in awareness, affordability, and access to appropriate menstrual health resources [14,16,31]. The geographical differences should be interpreted in relation to the social, cultural, economic, and health-system contexts of tribal communities. For example, studies among tribal populations in Odisha documented culturally specific menstrual restrictions and beliefs, while evidence from Jharkhand highlighted challenges related to access to information and healthcare services [28,30]. Similarly, findings from Gujarat and Maharashtra suggest that availability of services and awareness may influence menstrual hygiene practices. These variations indicate that, although menstrual health barriers are common across tribal populations, their form and intensity differ by state and local context. Therefore, interventions should be geographically and culturally responsive rather than relying on a uniform approach across tribal communities in India.

Cultural taboos, restrictions, and psychological impact regarding menstruation have subsided with time, and no relevant activities are left untouched. The reviewed studies reveal a wide set of restrictive practices that influence the psychological well-being of adolescent girls. The painful experiences during menstruation, such as exclusion from religious spaces, restriction while cooking, and segregation within the household, were widely reported in some studies [19]. They observed that Juang and Dongria Kondh tribal women from Odisha experienced a lot of restrictions, including social exclusion and avoiding religious activities, during menstruation. Superstitions further increase menstrual distress [4,30]. However, girls were said that improper disposal of menstrual absorbents for menstruation would attract wild animals, while others think ghosts haunt women during menstruation [19]. All these myths make one feel fear, anxiety, and isolated, and thus impact one’s mental health.

The study brings out both the positive and distressing experiences related to menstruation. Cultural celebrations, such as menarcheal rites, play a very significant role in reinforcing positive menstrual experiences since they symbolise a girl’s transition to womanhood. These celebrations also reinforce societal expectations, such as early marriage, which is very restrictive. Another contributing factor to distress is menstrual taboos and myths. Many girls associate menstruation with fear, stress, and psychological distress due to cultural beliefs [16]. Myths about menstrual absorbent disposal attracting wild animals or menstruating women being haunted by ghosts exacerbate these concerns, leading to restrictive behaviours such as sleeping outdoors or carrying protective objects like copper nails [27]. Furthermore, restrictive practices, including being segregated, refraining from cooking, and being barred from religious spaces, are still prevalent [32]. Menstrual hygiene practices also vary significantly, with many women, particularly from marginalised communities, having limited access to disposable absorbents. Exclusive use of disposable products is influenced by caste, socioeconomic status, and education level, with women from Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, and Other Backwards Classes having lower odds of using such products [27,33]. Hygiene awareness remains inadequate among tribal women, where primitive practices, such as tying a leaf with mud around the waist or sitting on an earthen pot, persist, leading to infections and discomfort [32]. Findings from a qualitative study done by Raj et al. (2026), also highlight key barriers to menstrual health in tribal areas of Jharkhand, including low awareness, cultural beliefs, poor infrastructure, and gaps in healthcare delivery. These findings support the present review, emphasising the need for stronger health systems, targeted education, and community-based interventions [34].

Poor infrastructure remains among the biggest challenges to menstrual hygiene management. Chattopadhyay et al. (2019),reported that lack of access to water within household premises and lack of sanitation facilities were the two major contributors to unhygienic menstrual practices in the states such as Bihar, Odisha, and Chhattisgarh [21]. Similarly, Singh et al. (2022), found major geographic disparities, with Tamil Nadu reporting maximum exclusive hygienic method use compared to Uttar Pradesh [10]. Meher et al highlighted that Madhya Pradesh and Bihar were unhygienic menstrual practices hotspots due to poverty, lack of toilet facilities, and rural residence [35]. The issue also lies in the availability of menstrual products. One study indicated that only a small proportion of rural women in Haryana used sanitary napkins, and financial constraints were the prime barrier. The mean price women were willing to pay per napkin was Rs. 0.54 (US$ 0.01), which meant that there is a need for cost-effective and subsidised menstrual products [28,36].

The consequences of inadequate menstrual hygiene are not limited to social and psychological distress but also have severe health risks. Vishwakarma et al. (2021), found that lack of proper menstrual hygiene is related to increased risks of reproductive tract infections (RTIs) [23]. Another study also stressed the fact that dysmenorrhea, irregular menstruation, and premenstrual syndrome (PMS) were common among women with poor menstrual hygiene [37]. Additionally, Thakur et al. (2020), found an association between dietary habits, body fat percentage, and menstrual irregularities, thus suggesting the need for integrated health interventions that include nutrition education [29].

The policy and programmatic interventions addressing menstrual hygiene issues should be multi-layered, involving education, infrastructure development, community engagement, and policy interventions. A similar study demonstrated the impact on MHM in tribal girls through the effective use of government systems in enhancing knowledge and practice [14]. Such initiatives, if extended to rural or marginalised communities, would help in filling gaps in menstrual health. Menstrual health awareness should be actively promoted by functionaries of the health sector. Delfin et al. opined that healthcare workers should be involved in menstrual education programmes [36]. In the meanwhile, one study opined that the girl students should be given guidance in schools and menstrual-related fears and anxieties can be removed through health camps [37]. Affordability and accessibility of menstrual products should be prioritised. Government initiatives like the distribution of subsidised sanitary napkins can really enhance menstrual hygiene practices among low-income and marginalised communities. Additionally, incorporating menstrual hygiene education into school curricula can help dismantle deep-rooted taboos and myths surrounding menstruation. Studies also reported that nearly all participants ignored menstrual pain, while a few opted for bed rest, and resorted to self-medication, some used hot applications and relied on home remedies. Around 40% managed dysmenorrhea independently, one-fourth sought support from friends, and reached out to teachers for help [12]. Hence, restrictions such as exclusion from religious functions and school remain prevalent [28]. These findings highlight a predominant tendency for self-management, with limited external assistance.

Our review highlights that menstrual health challenges among tribal adolescent girls are driven by intersecting socioeconomic, cultural, and infrastructural barriers, resulting in poor hygiene practices, health risks, and educational disruptions. The findings emphasise that addressing these outcomes requires integrated, context-specific interventions focusing on education, accessibility, and health system strengthening through inclusion of menstrual health competencies in school education, better access to affordable menstrual products, and strengthened WASH infrastructure. Targeted interventions like street plays, quizzes, poster competitions, rallies, fundraising through sports and literary events, which can be accessible to tribal girls, should address socioeconomic and caste disparities, while community engagement and culturally sensitive approaches are essential to reduce stigma. Strengthening frontline healthcare services and promoting adolescent-friendly programs are crucial. Future research should focus on high-quality, longitudinal, and intervention-based studies covering diverse tribal populations.

Study limitations

This systematic review has several limitations that should be considered while interpreting the findings. First, the review included studies published only in English, which may have led to language bias and exclusion of relevant regional literature. Second, the majority of included studies were cross-sectional in design, limiting the ability to establish causal relationships between menstrual health determinants and outcomes. Third, there was considerable heterogeneity across studies in terms of study populations, geographic regions, methodologies, and outcome measures, which restricted the possibility of conducting a meta-analysis and limited comparability. Additionally, qualitative studies relied on self-reported data, which may be subject to recall and social desirability bias. Some studies had limited geographic coverage, with underrepresentation of certain tribal groups and regions, affecting generalizability. Furthermore, variations in quality, with a proportion of studies rated as moderate, indicate potential methodological limitations such as inadequate control of confounders. Lastly, the review focused primarily on published literature, and despite limited grey literature inclusion, there remains a possibility of publication bias.

Conclusion

This systematic review identified key menstrual health challenges among tribal adolescent girls in India, leading to various outcomes shaped by contextual factors such as socioeconomic status, cultural beliefs, practices, and infrastructural factors. The findings highlight low awareness before menarche, inequitable access to hygienic products, and persistent caste and economic disparities that hinder safe practices. Cultural taboos and stigma contribute to psychological distress and poor health-seeking behaviours, while inadequate WASH facilities and limited healthcare support further restrict effective menstrual hygiene management. These challenges lead to increased health risks, including reproductive tract infections, and higher school absenteeism, affecting both health and education. Overall, menstrual health remains a neglected public health issue, requiring integrated, culturally sensitive interventions to improve outcomes and ensure dignity and well-being.

Supporting information

S1 PRISMA Checklist. This S1 file contains PRISMA 2020 checklist used for reporting the systematic review and meta-analysis.

S2 data extraction sheet.xlsx. This S2 file contains a data extraction sheet containing the information extracted from the studies included in the systematic review and meta-analysis.

(DOCX)

pone.0360401.s001.docx (291.7KB, docx)

Data Availability

The minimal data generated is available as a data extraction sheet in excel and PRISMA checklist is attached as a supporting files.

Funding Statement

The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.

References

  • 1.Ganguly M, Jana S, Ganguly A, Midya DK. Menstruation in Adolescent Girls: Myths and Taboos. ABS. 2024;67(2):67. doi: 10.14720/abs.67.2.18725 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.International Work Group for Indigenous Affairs. India - IWGIA - International Work Group for Indigenous Affairs. n.d. (cited 2/10/2025). Available from: https://iwgia.org/en/india.html [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Neelkanth N, Singh D, Health PB. A study to assess the knowledge regarding practices of menstrual hygiene and RTI among high and higher secondary school girls: An educational. JCMP. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Mudi PK, Pradhan MR, Meher T. Menstrual health and hygiene among Juang women: a particularly vulnerable tribal group in Odisha, India. Reprod Health. 2023;20(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s12978-023-01603-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Rossouw L, Ross H. Understanding period poverty: socio-economic inequalities in menstrual hygiene management in eight low- and middle-income countries. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(5):2571. doi: 10.3390/IJERPH18052571 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, National Health Mission. Menstrual Hygiene Policy: Menstrual Hygiene Policy for School-Going Girls. n.d. (cited 9/10/2026). Available from: https://nhm.gov.in/index1.php?lang=1&level=3&sublinkid=1531&lid=859 [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ministry of Tribal Affairs, Government of India. Pradhan Mantri Janjati Adiwasi Nyaya Maha Abhiyan (PMJANMAN). n.d. (cited 9/10/2026). Available from: https://tribal.nic.in/pm-janman.aspx [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ministry of Tribal Affairs, Government of India. Dharti Aaba Janjatiya Gram Utkarsh Abhiyan. n.d. (cited 9/10/2026). Available from: https://tribal.nic.in/dajagua.aspx [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Rayyan. Intelligent Systematic Review - Rayyan. n.d. (cited 9/3/2024). Available from: https://www.rayyan.ai/ [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Singh A, Chakrabarty M, Singh S, Chandra R, Chowdhury S, Singh A. Menstrual hygiene practices among adolescent women in rural India: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2022;22(1):2126. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14622-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.PRISMA. 2020 Flow Diagram — PRISMA Statement. n.d. (cited 9/3/2024). Available from: https://www.prisma-statement.org/prisma-2020-flow-diagram [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Udayar SE, Jeergiyal DP, Kruthika K. Predictors of dysmenorrhea and its impact on quality of life among tribal adolescent girls in India. Unnes J Public Health. 2022;11(1):23–32. doi: 10.15294/UJPH.V11I1.45965 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Chauhan S, Kumar P, Marbaniang SP, Srivastava S, Patel R, Dhillon P. Examining the predictors of use of sanitary napkins among adolescent girls: A multi-level approach. PLoS One. 2021;16(4):e0250788. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250788 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Vayeda M, Ghanghar V, Desai S, Shah P, Modi D, Dave K, et al. Improving menstrual hygiene management among adolescent girls in tribal areas of Gujarat: an evaluation of an implementation model integrating the government service delivery system. Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2021;29(2):1992199. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2021.1992199 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Agarwal V, Fancy M, Shah H. Menstrual hygiene: knowledge and practice among adolescent girls of rural Sabarkantha district. 2017.
  • 16.Borkar SK, Borkar A, Shaikh MK, Mendhe H, Ambad R, Joshi A. Study of Menstrual Hygiene Practices Among Adolescent Girls in a Tribal Area of Central India. Cureus. 2022;14(10):e30247. doi: 10.7759/cureus.30247 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kumari S, Sood S, Davis S, Chaudhury S. Knowledge and practices related to menstruation among tribal adolescent girls. Ind Psychiatry J. 2021;30(Suppl 1):S160–5. doi: 10.4103/0972-6748.328808 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Karjee S, Rahaman M, Biswas PC. Contextualizing the socio-economic and spatial patterns of using menstrual hygienic methods among young women (15–24 years) in India: A cross-sectional study using the nationally representative survey. Clin Epidemiol Glob Health. 2023;20:101253. doi: 10.1016/j.cegh.2023.101253 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Sharma S, Akhtar F, Singh RK, Mehra S. Comparing Reproductive Health Awareness, Nutrition, and Hygiene among Early and Late Adolescents from Marginalized Populations of India: A Community-Based Cross-Sectional Survey. Healthcare (Basel). 2021;9(8):980. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9080980 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Anand E, Singh J, Unisa S. Menstrual hygiene practices and its association with reproductive tract infections and abnormal vaginal discharge among women in India. Sex Reprod Healthc. 2015;6(4):249–54. doi: 10.1016/j.srhc.2015.06.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Chattopadhyay A, Sethi V, Nagargoje VP, Saraswat A, Surani N, Agarwal N, et al. WASH practices and its association with nutritional status of adolescent girls in poverty pockets of eastern India. BMC Womens Health. 2019;19(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s12905-019-0787-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kathuria B, Raj S. Effects of socio-economic conditions on usage of hygienic method of menstrual protection among young women in EAG states of India.
  • 23.Vishwakarma D, Puri P, Sharma SK. Interlinking menstrual hygiene with Women’s empowerment and reproductive tract infections: Evidence from India. Clin Epidemiol Glob Health. 2021;10:100668. doi: 10.1016/j.cegh.2020.11.001 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Singh S, Sharma P, Singh RR, Tripathi SK, Yadav PK. Examining the impact of socioeconomic and demographic factors on women’s health: A survey-based study of menstrual hygiene, pregnancy, and postpregnancy care in the Gonds Tribe of Sonbhadra, Uttar Pradesh. J Family Med Prim Care. 2024;13(10):4663–70. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_555_24 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Babbar K, Vandana, Arora A. Bleeding at the margins: understanding period poverty among SC and ST women using decomposition analysis. J Dev Stud. 2024;60(1):131–46. doi: 10.1080/00220388.2023.2252139 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Aparnavi P, Ramanathan R, Shanmugam J, Narayanan S, Kumar M, Ramya V, et al. Suitability, acceptability, feasibility of modern menstrual methods: a qualitative study in Coimbatore district, Tamil Nadu, India. Front Glob Womens Health. 2024;5:1497686. doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2024.1497686 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Panda N, Desaraju S, Panigrahy RP, Ghosh U, Saxena S, Singh P, et al. Menstrual health and hygiene amongst adolescent girls and women of reproductive age: a study of practices and predictors, Odisha, India. BMC Womens Health. 2024;24(1):144. doi: 10.1186/s12905-024-02894-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Thakur J, Goswami M, Roy S. Understanding menstrual characteristics from the perspective of reproductive energetics: a study on the adolescent Oraon tribal populations. AR. 2020;83(2):109–28. doi: 10.2478/anre-2020-0009 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Mudi PK, Pradhan MR. Attitude and determinants of contraceptive use among the Juang tribe: A cross-sectional study in Odisha, India. Clin Epidemiol Glob Health. 2023;24:101448. doi: 10.1016/j.cegh.2023.101448 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Bhagwat A, Jijina P. A Psychosocial Lens on an Indigenous Initiative to Address Menstrual Health and Hygiene in Indian Villages. Soc Work Public Health. 2020;35(3):73–89. doi: 10.1080/19371918.2020.1738972 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Bhoi N, Acharya SK. Health status of particularly vulnerable tribal groups (PVTGs) of Odisha: a narrative review. J Health Popul Nutr. 2024;43(1):176. doi: 10.1186/s41043-024-00671-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Ram U, Pradhan MR, Patel S, Ram F. Factors Associated with Disposable Menstrual Absorbent Use Among Young Women in India. Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2020;46:223–34. doi: 10.1363/46e0320 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Raj R, Begum J, Ali SI, Panda M. Multi-stakeholder perspectives on reproductive and adolescent healthcare schemes in tribal regions of India: A qualitative study. PLoS One. 2026;21(2):e0343794. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0343794 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Meher T, Sahoo H. Dynamics of usage of menstrual hygiene and unhygienic methods among young women in India: a spatial analysis. BMC Womens Health. 2023;23(1):573. doi: 10.1186/s12905-023-02710-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Tan DA, Haththotuwa R, Fraser IS. Cultural aspects and mythologies surrounding menstruation and abnormal uterine bleeding. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2017;40:121–33. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2016.09.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Chatterjee R, Chakrabarty S. Menstrual disorders and associated factors among rural and tribal adolescent girls in India: A systematic review and meta-analysis. AR. 2024;87(4):1–24. doi: 10.18778/1898-6773.87.4.01 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Kakeri M, Patil S, Adol RW-IJY, et al. Knowledge and practice gap for menstrual hygiene among adolescent school girls of tribal district of Maharashtra, India: A cross sectional study. Indian J Youth Adolesc Health 2018;5(3):23–27. doi: 10.24321/2349.2880.201816 [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Alison Parker

7 Sep 2026

Dear Dr. Begum,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS One. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS One’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Oct 07 2026 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

  • A letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS One offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

As the corresponding author, your ORCID iD is verified in the submission system and will appear in the published article. PLOS supports the use of ORCID, and we encourage all coauthors to register for an ORCID iD and use it as well. Please encourage your coauthors to verify their ORCID iD within the submission system before final acceptance, as unverified ORCID iDs will not appear in the published article. Only the individual author can complete the verification step; PLOS staff cannot verify ORCID iDs on behalf of authors.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Alison Parker

Academic Editor

PLOS One

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE’s style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf.

2. We note that your Data Availability Statement is currently as follows: [Data is available in the manuscript. ]

Please confirm at this time whether or not your submission contains all raw data required to replicate the results of your study. Authors must share the “minimal data set” for their submission. PLOS defines the minimal data set to consist of the data required to replicate all study findings reported in the article, as well as related metadata and methods (https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-minimal-data-set-definition).

For example, authors should submit the following data:

- The values behind the means, standard deviations and other measures reported;

- The values used to build graphs;

- The points extracted from images for analysis.

Authors do not need to submit their entire data set if only a portion of the data was used in the reported study.

If your submission does not contain these data, please either upload them as Supporting Information files or deposit them to a stable, public repository and provide us with the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers. For a list of recommended repositories, please see https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/recommended-repositories.

If there are ethical or legal restrictions on sharing a de-identified data set, please explain them in detail (e.g., data contain potentially sensitive information, data are owned by a third-party organization, etc.) and who has imposed them (e.g., an ethics committee). Please also provide contact information for a data access committee, ethics committee, or other institutional body to which data requests may be sent. If data are owned by a third party, please indicate how others may request data access.

3. Please include captions for your Supporting Information files at the end of your manuscript, and update any in-text citations to match accordingly. Please see our Supporting Information guidelines for more information: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/supporting-information.

4. If the reviewer comments include a recommendation to cite specific previously published works, please review and evaluate these publications to determine whether they are relevant and should be cited. There is no requirement to cite these works unless the editor has indicated otherwise.

5. Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer’s Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously? -->?>

Reviewer #1: N/A

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available??>

The PLOS Data policy

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English??>

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

Reviewer #1: A very interesting review of a relatively neglected area of discussion at a wider level. I think the paper is well written, structured well and the review has followed a rigourous process. I have some reflections which would help to strengthen the paper further.

In the introduction, it may be worth adding some detail about the policy context for MHH in India e.g. SBM and the various national schemes in place to set the tone, and to help to position the paper’s focus on tribal communities. There is reference to tribal communities as making up 8.6% of India’s population- Given that tribal communities are such a small percentage and in isolated areas, can you please expand a little more on the details about the cultural practices, poverty and lack of healthcare services and the impact this has for them?

The paper makes reference to government schemes for tribal populations at the top of page 10. lt may be worth clarifying which government schemes have been put in place already, or at least to give some examples in relation to tribal communities

I appreciate the strength of the well-designed search strategy. Did the search also specify "India" as a term?

An overall bit of feedback for the results section: as this is a review, I would reference each publication throughout the whole section. What was classed as 'media' as part of the review- was social media included? It may be worth specifying this more clearly. In the section on school absenteeism, a reference is needed for the 14.7% statistic on teachers.

I would urge caution about saying MHM is the critical issue for public health in India, and maybe loosen the language at the start of the discussion section.

Throughout the text, it might be worth adding in the geographies/states the studies are focused on, to deepen the understanding of the issues in different contexts in India. This would make it more relatable and easier to understand the findings

I would also recommend you clarify the language a little throughout the discussion - repeated references to 'studies' is confusing, and I would advise changing to "[name] et al found that...."

Overall, this is a thorough and important review on a niche and neglected area in MHH in India.

Reviewer #2: The manuscript is technically sound, employing a well-structured and rigorous systematic review methodology. A commendable aspect of this work is the complete availability and transparency of the underlying data throughout the manuscript and supplementary material, which ensures the full reproducibility of the study. The collected evidence logically and consistently substantiates the presented analyses and conclusions. By addressing the specific socioeconomic and cultural nuances pertaining to tribal adolescent girls in India, this study addresses a critical gap in the existing literature on menstrual health and dignity. Given its scientific rigor and robust empirical foundation, I consider this manuscript to make a valuable contribution to the field.

**********

what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy

Reviewer #1: Yes:  Amita Bhakta

Reviewer #2: Yes:  Amanda Guimaraes Cunha

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

To ensure your figures meet our technical requirements, please review our figure guidelines: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures

You may also use PLOS’s free figure tool, NAAS, to help you prepare publication quality figures: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-tools-for-figure-preparation.

NAAS will assess whether your figures meet our technical requirements by comparing each figure against our figure specifications.

PLoS One. 2026 Oct 12;21(10):e0360401. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0360401.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 1


10 Sep 2026

Reviewer #1: A very interesting review of a relatively neglected area of discussion at a wider level. I think the paper is well written, well structured, and the review has followed a rigorous process. I have some reflections which would help to strengthen the paper further.

1. In the introduction, it may be worth adding some detail about the policy context for MHH in India, e.g. SBM and the various national schemes in place to set the tone, and to help to position the paper’s focus on tribal communities. There is reference to tribal communities as making up 8.6% of India’s population. Given that tribal communities are such a small percentage and in isolated areas, can you please expand a little more on the details about the cultural practices, poverty and lack of healthcare services and the impact this has on them?

Answer: Thank you for this valuable suggestion. We have updated the we have expanded the Introduction to provide greater context on India’s policy landscape for menstrual health and hygiene (including SBM and relevant national schemes), and to elaborate on the cultural practices, poverty, limited healthcare access, and related challenges affecting tribal communities.

2. The paper refers to government schemes for tribal populations at the top of page 10. It may be worth clarifying which government schemes have been put in place already, or at least to give some examples in relation to tribal communities.

Answer: Thank you for this important remark. We have rephrased the paragraph and added similar government schemes.

3. I appreciate the strength of the well-designed search strategy. Did the search also specify "India" as a term?

Answer: Yes, we have mentioned “India” as a term in the search strategy and updated in the search terms used in the manuscript.

4. An overall bit of feedback for the results section: as this is a review, I would reference each publication throughout the whole section. What was classed as 'media' as part of the review- was social media included? It may be worth specifying this more clearly. In the section on school absenteeism, a reference is needed for the 14.7% statistic on teachers.

Answer: Thank you for this helpful feedback; we have revised the Results section to consistently cite the included publications, clarified that “media” included social media where applicable, and added the appropriate reference for the reported 14.7% statistic on teachers.

5. I would urge caution about saying MHM is the critical issue for public health in India, and maybe loosen the language at the start of the discussion section.

Answer: Thank you for this important observation. We agree that describing menstrual health management (MHM) as “the critical issue” in India may overstate the evidence presented in our review. We have therefore revised the opening of the Discussion to use more cautious and evidence-based language. Specifically, the phrase “The critical issue in India’s public health” has been replaced with “Menstrual health management (MHM) remains an important public health and social concern, particularly among adolescent girls and women from marginalised communities in India.” This revision better reflects the scope and findings of our review while avoiding an overly broad national claim.

6. Throughout the text, it might be worth adding the geographies/states the studies are focused on, to deepen the understanding of the issues in different contexts in India. This would make it more relatable and easier to understand the findings.

Answer: We have updated as per the suggestion in the results and discussion section. State and geographical location.

7. I would also recommend you clarify the language a little throughout the discussion - repeated references to 'studies' is confusing, and I would advise changing to "[name] et al found that...."

Answer: We have updated the changes as per suggested.

Overall, this is a thorough and important review on a niche and neglected area in MHH in India.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Reviewer comment plos.docx

pone.0360401.s003.docx (25.9KB, docx)

Decision Letter 1

Alison Parker

27 Sep 2026

Menstrual health challenges and associated barriers among tribal adolescent girls in India: A systematic review

PONE-D-26-27585R1

Dear Dr. Begum,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice will be generated when your article is formally accepted. Please note, if your institution has a publishing partnership with PLOS and your article meets the relevant criteria, all or part of your publication costs will be covered. Please make sure your user information is up-to-date by logging into Editorial Manager at Editorial Manager® and clicking the ‘Update My Information' link at the top of the page. For questions related to billing, please contact billing support.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Alison Parker

Academic Editor

PLOS One

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer’s Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions??>

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously? -->?>

Reviewer #1: N/A

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available??>

The PLOS Data policy

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English??>

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

Reviewer #1: Thank you for addressing the comments, I am satisfied that my feedback has been well addressed on this important paper.

**********

what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy

Reviewer #1: Yes:  Amita Bhakta

**********

Acceptance letter

Alison Parker

PONE-D-26-27585R1

PLOS One

Dear Dr. Begum,

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS One. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now being handed over to our production team.

At this stage, our production department will prepare your paper for publication. This includes ensuring the following:

* All references, tables, and figures are properly cited

* All relevant supporting information is included in the manuscript submission,

* There are no issues that prevent the paper from being properly typeset

You will receive further instructions from the production team, including instructions on how to review your proof when it is ready. Please keep in mind that we are working through a large volume of accepted articles, so please give us a few days to review your paper and let you know the next and final steps.

Lastly, if your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

You will receive an invoice from PLOS for your publication fee after your manuscript has reached the completed accept phase. If you receive an email requesting payment before acceptance or for any other service, this may be a phishing scheme. Learn how to identify phishing emails and protect your accounts at https://explore.plos.org/phishing.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at customercare@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS One and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS One Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Alison Parker

Academic Editor

PLOS One

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 PRISMA Checklist. This S1 file contains PRISMA 2020 checklist used for reporting the systematic review and meta-analysis.

    S2 data extraction sheet.xlsx. This S2 file contains a data extraction sheet containing the information extracted from the studies included in the systematic review and meta-analysis.

    (DOCX)

    pone.0360401.s001.docx (291.7KB, docx)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Reviewer comment plos.docx

    pone.0360401.s003.docx (25.9KB, docx)

    Data Availability Statement

    The minimal data generated is available as a data extraction sheet in excel and PRISMA checklist is attached as a supporting files.


    Articles from PLOS One are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES