Skip to main content
Diagnostics logoLink to Diagnostics
. 2026 Oct 7;16(19):3233. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics16193233

Sonographic Diagnosis of Intraplacental Hematoma in Preterm Pregnancy: A Case Report and Review of Literature

Sonia-Teodora Luca 1,2, Vlăduț Săsăran 2,*, Ovidiu Grama 2, Diana Maria Chiorean 3, Claudiu Mărginean 2
Editor: George Daskalakis
PMCID: PMC13664210  PMID: 42882388

Abstract

Background: Intraplacental hematomas are uncommon placental lesions with potentially significant clinical implications, and their antenatal diagnosis remains challenging. This case report aims to present a rare case of a rapidly enlarging intraplacental hematoma diagnosed antenatally by serial ultrasonographic examinations and to highlight the potential role of ultrasonography in its diagnosis. Case Presentation: A 22-year-old gravida 2, para 2 woman presented at 34 weeks and 3 days of gestation for routine antenatal evaluation. Her pregnancy was complicated by intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy, treated with ursodeoxycholic acid, with subsequent improvement in biochemical parameters and symptoms. Although asymptomatic, she was noted to have intermittent hypertension. Ultrasonography revealed a well-circumscribed, hypoechoic intraplacental mass measuring 4.37 × 4.0 cm. Color Doppler demonstrated several apparent vascular channels extending through and around the lesion. Repeat ultrasonography 10 min later showed rapid enlargement, raising suspicion of an active intraplacental hematoma. In view of the rapidly progressive sonographic findings and maternal hypertension, emergency cesarean delivery was performed. A newborn was delivered with Apgar scores of 8 and 9 at 1 and 5 min, respectively. Histopathological examination confirmed extensive recent intraplacental hemorrhage, with erythrocyte extravasation into the intervillous spaces and compression of adjacent chorionic villi, without evidence of organization. Conclusions: Meticulous placental assessment during prenatal ultrasonography is important, particularly in complicated pregnancies. Color Doppler and serial ultrasonographic examinations may help characterize intraplacental lesions and detect rapid interval changes, facilitating timely obstetric intervention. Histopathological examination remains essential for definitive diagnosis. Further research is needed to clarify the pathogenesis and clinical significance of intraplacental hematomas.

Keywords: intraplacental hematoma, preterm pregnancy, sonography, placenta, preeclampsia, placental hematoma

1. Introduction and Clinical Significance

The placenta plays a crucial role during pregnancy by mediating the exchange of gases, nutrients, and metabolic waste products between maternal and fetal circulations [1]. Throughout pregnancy, placenta must maintain essential transport, metabolic, and endocrine functions, while undergoing continuous structural and developmental changes [1,2]. In addition, it provides a protective and supportive intrauterine environment, which is essential for normal fetal growth and development [2].

The pathology of the placenta is a well-established contributor to adverse pregnancy outcomes and placental disorders, which encompass a broad spectrum of structural, vascular, and inflammatory abnormalities that may compromise placental function, impair fetal growth, contribute to pregnancy-related complications, and, in severe cases, result in fetal loss [2,3]. These pathological changes primarily include maternal and fetal vascular mal-perfusion, acute or chronic inflammatory lesions, and abnormalities of placental implantation [3].

Intrauterine hematomas are a relatively common complication of pregnancy and may occur at any stage of gestation [4,5,6]. Both early- and late-onset intrauterine hematomas have been associated with an increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes, including vaginal bleeding, miscarriage, preterm birth, pregnancy-induced hypertension, preeclampsia, gestational diabetes, fetal growth restriction, and stillbirth [4,5,6,7,8,9]. Despite their reported associations with adverse pregnancy outcomes, the clinical significance of intrauterine hematomas (IUHs) remains controversial [6,7,10,11,12,13]. Since their initial description, studies have reported inconsistent findings regarding their prognostic significance, with some demonstrating an increased risk of adverse perinatal outcomes, whereas others have found no significant association between IUHs and adverse perinatal outcomes [8,9,12,14].

Placental hematomas may be classified according to their anatomical location into four principal types: retroplacental, subchorionic, subamniotic and intraplacental [4]. On ultrasonographic examination, hematomas typically appear as hypoechoic or heterogeneous collections located between the uterine wall and the chorionic membrane [6,15]. Therefore, the sonographic appearance of placental hematomas varies according to their anatomical location. Retroplacental hematomas are located between the basal plate and the underlying myometrium resulting in elevation of the placental parenchyma toward the amniotic cavity. Subchorionic hematomas typically appear as crescent-shaped or triangular hypoechoic or heterogeneous collections situated between the chorionic membrane and the uterine wall. Subamniotic hematomas are generally visualized as oval or cystic masses arising from the fetal surface of the placenta and typically demonstrate no detectable internal vascularity on color Doppler imaging. Intraplacental hematomas, in contrast, are located within the placental parenchyma, predominantly involving the intervillous spaces [4,6,11,12].

Among these, intraplacental hematomas are particularly uncommon, and the available literature remains limited [4,13]. Histopathological studies have demonstrated that rounded intraplacental hematomas exhibit distinctive morphological characteristics compared with parabasal located intervillous thrombohematomas [4,13,16]. An intraplacental hematoma represents a localized accumulation of blood within the placental parenchyma and should be distinguished from other hemorrhagic lesions, particularly intervillous thrombus and rounded intraplacental hematoma [17,18,19]. The Amsterdam Placental Workshop Group Consensus Statement has provided a standardized framework for the classification of placental lesions, which has subsequently been adopted and further discussed in contemporary placental pathology literature [18,20]. According to this Consensus, intervillous thrombus represents a localized accumulation of maternal blood within the intervillous space, frequently associated with fibrin deposition and varying degrees of organization, whereas a rounded intraplacental hematoma is a circumscribed hemorrhagic lesion located within the placental parenchyma [17,18,19]. Although these lesions may demonstrate overlapping macroscopic and ultrasonographic features, their distinction should be based on anatomical localization, morphological characteristics, evolution, and, when available, histopathological findings [17,18].

The objective of this case report is to present a rare case of a rapidly enlarging intra-placental hematoma diagnosed antenatally by serial ultrasonographic examinations and to highlight the potential role of grayscale ultrasonography and color Doppler imaging in its identification and characterization. This case also aims to emphasize the importance of recognizing rapid interval changes in placental lesions, particularly in the context of maternal hypertension, and to discuss the correlation between antenatal imaging findings and definitive histopathological findings.

2. Case Report

2.1. Clinical Presentation

A 22-year-old woman, gravida 2, para 2, with a spontaneously conceived pregnancy presented to our department for a routine antenatal examination at 34 weeks and 3 days of gestation. She was asymptomatic at presentation and had received routine mineral and vitamin supplementation (including calcium, iron, magnesium, vitamins B1, B2, and B6, folic acid, and vitamin D) supplementation during pregnancy. During the preceding four weeks she had been treated with ursodeoxycholic acid at a dose of 250 mg three times daily (10 mg/kg/day) for symptomatic intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy. Her blood group was 0 RhD-positive. She had a previously uncomplicated pregnancy in 2022, when she gave birth to a term baby weighing 2.6 kg, via cesarean section due to breech presentation.

The current pregnancy had been uneventful until 30 weeks of gestation, with no maternal or fetal complications. Serological screening for toxoplasmosis, rubella, cytomegalovirus and herpes simplex virus (TORCH) infections during the first trimester was negative for IgM (immunoglobulin M) antibodies. Immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies were positive for all tested infections, indicating previous exposure and/or established immunity. Therefore, repeat serological testing was not considered necessary during the third trimester. Serological testing for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) types 1 and 2 was performed, with a negative test result. Laboratory investigations, including a complete blood count, renal function tests, coagulation profile, C-reactive protein levels, urinalysis, negative proteinuria and thyroid function tests, were within normal limits. An oral glucose tolerance test was performed at 27 weeks of gestation, which excluded gestational diabetes mellitus.

At 30 weeks of gestation, the patient developed severe pruritus, predominantly affecting the palms of the hands and soles of the feet, with symptoms worsening at night. Laboratory investigations revealed elevated liver enzyme levels, with an alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level of 177 U/L (reference range: 0–34 U/L) and an aspartate aminotransferase (AST) level of 71 U/L (reference range: 11–34 U/L). Total and direct bilirubin levels were 1.4 mg/dL (reference range: 0.3–1.2 mg/dL) and 0.8 mg/dL (reference range: 0–0.5 mg/dL), respectively, while the total serum bile acid concentration was 16 μmol/L (reference range 1–6 μmol/L). These findings were consistent with a diagnosis of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy. As previously mentioned, treatment with ursodeoxycholic acid was initiated, resulting in a significant improvement in the biochemical markers of cholestasis after four weeks of therapy. The patient monitored her blood pressure twice daily, with measurements within the normal range.

At presentation for the routine antenatal examination, a vaginal examination revealed no signs of infection, and the cervix was closed. Cardiotocography showed no uterine contractions, and fetal heart rate variability was within normal limits. There were no clinical symptoms suggestive of preeclampsia, and urine protein testing was negative. However, at admission, the patient was diagnosed with gestational hypertension based on intermittently elevated blood pressure measurements, with a maximum recorded value of 164/100 mmHg. The diagnosis of gestational hypertension was based on new-onset hypertension, in the absence of proteinuria and without clinical or laboratory evidence of maternal end-organ dysfunction.

Ultrasonographic examination revealed an estimated fetal weight of 2591 g. Other sonographic parameters, including amniotic fluid volume, fetal anatomy, cervical length, and fetal Doppler waveforms, were within normal limits. Peripheral and central arterial and venous flow velocities were normal, with no sonographic evidence of fetal anemia or other signs of fetal distress.

Placental ultrasonographic examination was noteworthy. The placenta appeared homogenous without calcifications. However, a well-circumscribed, round, hypoechoic mass measuring approximately 2 cm in diameter was initially identified within the placental parenchyma (Figure 1). Color Doppler imaging demonstrated several large vascular channels extending from the surrounding placental tissue through and around the lesion, suggesting apparent internal vascularity and raising suspicion of an intraplacental hematoma (Figure 2).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Prenatal ultrasonography of the intraplacental hematoma at 34 weeks and 3 days of gestation: (A)—placental parenchyma, (arrowhead)—hematoma—a well-circumscribed, round, hypoechoic mass within the placental parenchyma.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Prenatal ultrasonography of the intraplacental hematoma at 34 weeks and 3 days of gestation: (A) placental parenchyma with the hematoma; (B) color Doppler images suggesting apparent internal vascularity (SlowFlowHD- software version EC360).

A repeated ultrasonographic examination, performed 10 min later, demonstrated a marked increase in the size of the lesion, which had enlarged to 4.37 × 4.0 cm in diameter (Figure 3).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Prenatal ultrasonography of the intraplacental hematoma at 34 weeks and 3 days of gestation: (A) placental parenchyma, (B) intraplacental hematoma, (C) fetal part.

Although intralesional vascularity is not considered a typical feature of hematomas, its presence in this case, together with the progressive enlargement of the lesion on serial ultrasonography, suggested an evolving hemorrhagic process, subsequently confirmed histopathologically. Therefore, these findings should be interpreted in the context of the lesion’s evolution and the overall clinical presentation. All examinations were performed using a Voluson E8 Series BT21 ultrasound system equipped with a C2-9 transducer, using the preset settings for third-trimester obstetric examinations.

In view of the significant ultrasonographic findings, in conjunction with maternal hypertension, the patient was admitted to our department for emergency delivery. An emergency cesarean section was performed, resulting in the delivery of a female baby with Apgar scores of 8 and 9 at 1 and 5 min, respectively. The amniotic fluid was meconium-stained. During surgery, the patient’s blood pressure remained elevated at 170/100 mmHg. Postoperatively, maternal blood pressure remained intermittently elevated, with peak values of 160/110 mmHg. Urinary protein remained negative, and no other clinical or laboratory features suggestive of preeclampsia were identified. The intermittent hypertension was effectively controlled with methyldopa (oral administration of 250 mg twice daily) and magnesium sulfate (intravenous infusion of 20% magnesium sulfate at a rate of 1–2 g/h for 24 h postpartum), and blood pressure subsequently returned to normotensive values once better pain control was achieved. The neonate was admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit and managed as a preterm infant. No abnormalities were identified on subsequent investigations, including cranial and renal ultrasonography and echocardiography.

During hospitalization, the patient received a single 1.5-g intravenous dose of ampicillin/sulbactam for perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis, enoxaparin 0.4 mL subcutaneously once daily for thromboprophylaxis, oxytocin 5 IU intravenously twice daily for three days as uterotonic therapy, as well as treatment for iron-deficiency anemia and concomitant analgesic and anti-inflammatory therapy. Prior to discharge, clinical and ultrasonographic examinations demonstrated a well-involuted uterus, with a 0.3-cm hyperechoic endocavitary collection. The patient’s clinical course was favorable, and she was discharged 8 days after delivery in good general condition. At the time of discharge, she was afebrile, with soft and elastic breasts and established lactation. The cesarean section wound was healing appropriately, blood pressure was stabilized within the normal range, and lochia was serosanguineous. Urination was physiological, and normal bowel function had been restored. Anticoagulation therapy was recommended for an additional 10 days after discharge.

2.2. Pathological Findings

The fetal adnexa included a placenta measuring 165 × 115 × 25 mm and weighing 390 g. The maternal surface was mildly lobulated and exhibited a poorly demarcated red–violaceous hemorrhagic area within the placental parenchyma, measuring approximately 45 mm in diameter and consistent with a recent intra-placental hematoma. No macroscopic evidence of placental infarction was identified. The umbilical cord demonstrated marginal insertion and was hypocoiled, measuring 125 × 5 × 5 mm, with the expected three vessels (two arteries and one vein). The amniotic membranes were translucent and attached to the placental margin, with no visible surface deposits.

Microscopically, the placental parenchyma comprised chorionic villi exhibiting a degree of maturation appropriate for the gestational age. An extensive area of recent intraplacental hemorrhage was identified within the placental parenchyma, characterized by extravasation of erythrocytes into the intervillous spaces, with compression of the adjacent villi and no evidence of organization (Figure 4). The villi adjacent to the hematoma demonstrated capillary congestion and mild ischemic changes. The amniochorionic membranes showed no evidence of acute inflammatory infiltrates. The umbilical cord contained three vessels and showed no significant histopathological abnormalities. No evidence of villitis, chorioamnionitis, funisitis, fetal vascular thrombosis, or placental infarction was identified in the examined sections. According to the Amsterdam Consensus, no histopathological features of maternal vascular malperfusion (MVM) were identified, including placental infarction or other characteristic MVM lesions. No features of fetal vascular malperfusion (FVM) were identified, including fetal vascular thrombi or other characteristic FVM lesions.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Recent intraplacental hematoma. Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E), 10× magnification. H&E-stained section showing a large intraparenchymal collection of erythrocytes within the placental parenchyma, associated with compression of the adjacent chorionic villi.

3. Discussion

The pathogenesis of intraplacental hematomas remains incompletely understood and is likely multifactorial [21,22,23]. These lesions are thought to result from disruption of the maternal or fetal placental vasculature, leading to hemorrhage within the placental parenchyma and accumulation of blood within the intervillous spaces [4,13,22,23,24,25]. Several factors can contribute to their development, including maternal hypertensive disorders, placental vascular abnormalities, impaired uteroplacental perfusion, and localized vascular injury [13,21,26,27,28,29]. Intraplacental hematomas may also occur in association with placental abruption or other conditions characterized by abnormal placental perfusion [13,29,30].

Accordingly, mechanisms such as localized disruption of maternal placental vessels or transient alterations in intervillous perfusion may be considered possible but unproven explanations for the hemorrhagic lesion in this case [11,17,22]. These mechanisms should not be regarded as established causal findings, as neither the histopathological examination nor the available clinical data directly demonstrated their occurrence [17,22]. This distinction is consistent with the Amsterdam consensus approach, which emphasizes standardized identification of defined placental lesions while recognizing that their underlying pathophysiological mechanisms may remain uncertain [17,20,22].

The distinctive feature of this case was the sudden onset of maternal hypertension in association with the incidental ultrasonographic detection of an asymptomatic intraplacental hematoma in a preterm pregnancy. Only a limited number of cases of intraplacental hematomas have been reported in the literature, whereas other types of placental hematomas have been more extensively documented. In some cases, these hematomas may be associated with placental abruption and increased maternal, fetal, and neonatal morbidity and mortality.

In the present report, we conducted a comprehensive search of the literature for cases of intraplacental hematoma published up to August 2026, using PubMed and the keyword “intraplacental hematoma.” Only two full-text articles reporting histopathologically confirmed cases of intraplacental hematoma were identified and considered the most relevant publications for the pathological characterization of this rare placental lesion.

Therefore, in 2019, Neville et al. conducted a prospective study of 26 cases of rounded intraplacental hematoma (RIH) and demonstrated that this lesion represents a high-risk placental pathology associated with maternal vascular malperfusion [13]. Compared with placentas exhibiting maternal vascular malperfusion without RIH, those with RIH were associated with a significantly higher incidence of stillbirth and a trend towards an increased risk of placental abruption [13]. The authors highlighted the potential role of antenatal ultrasonography in the detection of abnormal placental lesions, emphasizing the possible clinical significance of RIH when identified during pregnancy [13,17,30].

In 2025, Orlando et al. reported a case of a 25-year-old primigravida at 27 weeks of gestation who presented with severe abdominal pain and mild hypertension. Ultrasonographic examination demonstrated fetal growth restriction and a hypoechoic placental lesion, while subsequent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed multiple intraplacental lesions suggestive of multifocal hematomas or villous infarcts. The patient subsequently developed preeclampsia with severe features, and histopathological examination of the placenta confirmed multiple infarcts with features of maternal vascular malperfusion [25]. In their article, the authors highlighted the increasing role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as a valuable diagnostic modality in the evaluation of pregnancy-related complications, particularly when ultrasonographic findings are inconclusive or insufficient for definitive diagnosis [25,31]. Placental MRI may further facilitate the characterization of pathological findings associated with preeclampsia-spectrum disorders, including intraplacental hemorrhage, placental infarction, and abnormalities of placental perfusion [21,25,32]. Unlike the case reported by Orlando et al., our case demonstrated an isolated, rapidly expanding intraplacental hemorrhage without clinical symptoms attributable to the hematoma and in contrast, there was insufficient time to perform and interpret MRI before an emergency delivery.

Another important aspect to mention and highlight is the differential diagnosis and imaging pitfalls if a placental hematoma is detected on prenatal ultrasonography, which includes retroplacental hematomas, subchorionic hematomas, subamniotic thrombohematoma, chorioangioma and placental lakes [4,12,33,34,35]. Accurate differentiation among these entities is essential for appropriate clinical assessment and management. Thrombohematomas and chorioangiomas typically appear as heterogeneous echogenic masses on ultrasonography [36,37]. Placental chorioangiomas may mimic hematomas or focal placental infarctions on grayscale ultrasonography and may be differentiated by the presence of internal vascularity on color Doppler examination [38,39]. Placental lakes, defined as anechoic intraplacental spaces measuring at least 1 cm in their largest dimension and demonstrating turbulent blood flow on real-time ultrasonography, are generally considered benign findings and have not been consistently associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes [40,41,42]. There are also several entities that may mimic placental hematomas on prenatal ultrasonography, representing important imaging pitfalls, such as myometrial contractions; however, color Doppler imaging can aid in differentiation, as hematomas typically demonstrate absent or minimal internal vascularity [28]. Although hematomas typically lack internal vascularity, the presence of intralesional Doppler signals may occasionally be observed and should be interpreted in conjunction with the lesion’s evolution, morphology and clinical and pathological findings. Doppler ultrasonography plays an important role in the evaluation of placental abnormalities and may provide valuable information for both diagnosis and clinical management [34]. The following table summarizes the key imaging features distinguishing chorioangioma, placental lake, intervillous thrombus, and subchorionic hematoma (Table 1).

Table 1.

Differential diagnosis for focal intraplacental lesions.

Imaging Feature Chorioangioma Placental Lake Intervillous Thrombus Subchorionic Hematoma
Pathologic basis Benign vascular tumor from chorionic mesenchyme [39,43,44,45] Villous-free intervillous space containing maternal blood [23,41,46,47] Organized maternal blood/thrombus within the intervillous space, sometimes developing within a placental lake [48,49,50] Hemorrhagic collection between the chorion and decidual/subchorionic tissues [6,11,15,29]
Location Usually near the fetal/chorionic surface, frequently close to the cord insertion [39,43,45] Intraplacental; central/lobular, subchorionic, or marginal [40,41,51] Intraplacental, frequently involving a pre-existing placental lake [48,49,51] Usually peripheral/subchorionic, adjacent to the placental margin [6,11,15,29]
Greyscale appearance Hypoechoic or heterogeneous solid-appearing mass [34,39,43,45,46] Homogeneous anechoic area surrounded by normal placental tissue [40,41,42,46] Heterogeneous lesion; increasing echogenicity may reflect organization/thrombosis [46,48,49,51] Variable echogenicity depending on the age of hemorrhage [6,11,15,46,51]
Color Doppler Internal vascularity and/or identifiable feeding vessels [34,38,44,45,46] Usually no high-velocity internal vascularity; slow turbulent/swirl flow may be seen [24,40,41,42,46,51] No internal blood flow within the thrombosed component [24,46,48,51] Generally avascular internally
[6,11,15,24,46]
Shape Round or oval, mass-like, usually well circumscribed [34,35,38,43,44,45] Round/oval or irregular sonolucent space [40,41,42,51] Variable; may be round/oval with an increasingly echogenic peripheral [48,49] Crescentic, lentiform, or irregular collection [6,11,15]
Evolution May enlarge during pregnancy; vascularity may persist [34,35,38,43,44,45] May increase with advancing gestation [40,41,42] May develop an echogenic peripheral rim as fibrin and thrombus organize [24,46,48,51] Changes in echogenicity and morphology as the hemorrhage ages [6,11,15,52,53]
Main characteristics Solid mass + internal vascularity/feeding vessel [20,34,38,43,44,45,46] Anechoic maternal-blood space ± slow swirling flow [40,41] Avascular heterogeneous intraplacental lesion ± echogenic rim [46,48] Peripheral/subchorionic hemorrhagic collection [6,11,15,52,53,54]

4. Conclusions

Intraplacental hematomas are uncommon placental lesions with potentially significant clinical implications and their antenatal diagnosis remains challenging. This case highlights the importance of meticulous placental assessment during prenatal ultrasonography, particularly when a focal intraplacental lesion is identified in the setting of maternal hypertension. Color Doppler and serial ultrasound examinations may provide valuable information regarding lesion characterization and the detection of rapid interval changes, potentially influencing obstetric management.

In the present case, the detection of a rapidly enlarging, asymptomatic intraplacental hematoma in a preterm pregnancy, followed by histopathological confirmation of recent intraplacental hemorrhage, underscores the value of correlating antenatal imaging findings with placental pathology. Although the prognosis of these lesions cannot be established from isolated cases, recognition of intraplacental hematomas may require careful maternal and fetal surveillance and individualized clinical management. Further studies are required to clarify their pathogenesis, sonographic characteristics, relationship with hypertensive disorders, and potential impact on maternal and perinatal outcomes.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the project FOCUS: Training and Guidance for UMFST Researchers in Health, contract no. 100455/29.08.2025, project code SMIS 350717. The project is co-funded by the European Union under the Health Programme of the Ministry of Investments and European Projects and implemented through the Managing Authority for the Health Programme, PS/688/PS_P3/OP4/ESO4.7/PS_P3_ESO4.7_A6. During the preparation of this manuscript, the authors did not use Generative AI Tools for the purposes of this article. The authors have reviewed and edited the output and take full responsibility for the content of this publication.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:

IUHs Intrauterine hematomas
TORCH Serological screening for toxoplasmosis, rubella, cytomegalovirus and herpes simplex virus
IgM Immunoglobulin M antibodies
IgG Immunoglobulin G antibodies
HIV Human immunodeficiency virus
ALT Alanine aminotransferase
AST Aspartate aminotransferase
IU International unit
MVM Maternal vascular malperfusion
FVM Fetal vascular malperfusion
RIH Rounded intraplacental hematoma
MRI Magnetic resonance imaging

Author Contributions

S.-T.L. contributed to the report design, literature search, clinical management, data collection, and drafting of the manuscript. S.-T.L., V.S., O.G. and C.M. contributed to the clinical evaluation and management, ultrasonographic assessment, data interpretation, and critical revision of the manuscript. D.M.C. performed the histopathological examination and pathological interpretation. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinic II of Târgu–Mures. Ethics Committee authorized this study (decision number 9/2026 from 1 September 2026) in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki (1964).

Informed Consent Statement

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this manuscript and any accompanying images.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Funding Statement

This research received no external funding.

Footnotes

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

References

  • 1.Huppertz B. The Anatomy of the Normal Placenta. J. Clin. Pathol. 2008;61:1296–1302. doi: 10.1136/jcp.2008.055277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Burton G.J., Jauniaux E. What Is the Placenta? Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2015;213:S6.e1–S6.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.07.050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kingdom J., Hutcheon J.A., Gordijn S.J., El-Demellawy D., Grynspan D. Placental Pathology and Pregnancy Complications. J. Clin. Med. 2023;12:5053. doi: 10.3390/jcm12155053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ott J., Pecnik P., Promberger R., Pils S., Binder J., Chalubinski K.M. Intra- versus Retroplacental Hematomas: A Retrospective Case-Control Study on Pregnancy Outcomes. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017;17:366. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1539-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Leite J., Ross P., Rossi A.C., Jeanty P. Prognosis of Very Large First-Trimester Hematomas. J. Ultrasound Med. 2006;25:1441–1445. doi: 10.7863/jum.2006.25.11.1441. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Pearlstone M., Baxi L. Subchorionic Hematoma: A Review. Obstet. Gynecol. Surv. 1993;48:65–68. doi: 10.1097/00006254-199302000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Børlum K.G., Thomsen A., Clausen I., Eriksen G. Long-Term Prognosis of Pregnancies in Women with Intrauterine Hematomas. Obstet. Gynecol. 1989;74:231–233. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.van Oppenraaij R.H.F., Jauniaux E., Christiansen O.B., Horcajadas J.A., Farquharson R.G., Exalto N., on behalf of the ESHRE Special Interest Group for Early Pregnancy (SIGEP) Predicting Adverse Obstetric Outcome after Early Pregnancy Events and Complications: A Review. Hum. Reprod. Update. 2009;15:409–421. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmp009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Qin Z.-J., Xu Y., Du Y., Chen Y.-L., Sun L., Zheng A. Intrauterine Hematoma in the First Trimester and Pregnancy Complications: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front. Med. 2022;9:892146. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.892146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hashem A., Sarsam S.D. The Impact of Incidental Ultrasound Finding of Subchorionic and Retroplacental Hematoma in Early Pregnancy. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. India. 2019;69:43–49. doi: 10.1007/s13224-017-1072-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Xu T., Lun W., He Y. Subchorionic Hematoma: Research Status and Pathogenesis (Review) Med. Int. 2024;4:10. doi: 10.3892/mi.2024.134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Wang L., Pei C., Niu Z. Intraamniotic Hemorrhage: Challenges in Prenatal Detection: A Case Report. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025;25:917. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-08072-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Neville G., Russell N., O’Donoghue K., Fitzgerald B. Rounded Intraplacental Hematoma—A High Risk Placental Lesion as Illustrated by a Prospective Study of 26 Consecutive Cases. Placenta. 2019;81:18–24. doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2019.02.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Xiang L., Wei Z., Cao Y. Symptoms of an Intrauterine Hematoma Associated with Pregnancy Complications: A Systematic Review. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e111676. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0111676. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Heller H.T., Asch E.A., Durfee S.M., Goldenson R.P., Peters H.E., Ginsburg E.S., Doubilet P.M., Benson C.B. Subchorionic Hematoma: Correlation of Grading Techniques with First-Trimester Pregnancy Outcome. J. Ultrasound Med. 2018;37:1725–1732. doi: 10.1002/jum.14524. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Bendon R.W. Nosology: Infarction Hematoma, a Placental Infarction Encasing a Hematoma. Hum. Pathol. 2012;43:761–763. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2011.07.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Khong T.Y., Mooney E.E., Ariel I., Balmus N.C.M., Boyd T.K., Brundler M.-A., Derricott H., Evans M.J., Faye-Petersen O.M., Gillan J.E., et al. Sampling and Definitions of Placental Lesions: Amsterdam Placental Workshop Group Consensus Statement. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. 2016;140:698–713. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2015-0225-CC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Slack J.C., Parra-Herran C. Life After Amsterdam: Placental Pathology Consensus Recommendations and Beyond. Surg. Pathol. Clin. 2022;15:175–196. doi: 10.1016/j.path.2022.02.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Redline R.W., Roberts D.J., Parast M.M., Ernst L.M., Morgan T.K., Greene M.F., Gyamfi-Bannerman C., Louis J.M., Maltepe E., Mestan K.K., et al. Placental Pathology Is Necessary to Understand Common Pregnancy Complications and Achieve an Improved Taxonomy of Obstetrical Disease. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2023;228:187–202. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.08.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Yaguchi C., Ueda M., Mizuno Y., Fukuchi C., Matsumoto M., Furuta-Isomura N., Itoh H. Association of Placental Pathology with Physical and Neuronal Development of Infants: A Narrative Review and Reclassification of the Literature by the Consensus Statement of the Amsterdam Placental Workshop Group. Nutrients. 2024;16:1786. doi: 10.3390/nu16111786. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Sutherland M., Craver R. Multifocal Rounded Intraplacental Hematomas, Placental Abruption and Intrauterine Fetal Demise. Fetal Pediatr. Pathol. 2018;37:465–469. doi: 10.1080/15513815.2018.1520373. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Redline R.W., Ravishankar S., Bagby C.M., Saab S.T., Zarei S. Four Major Patterns of Placental Injury: A Stepwise Guide for Understanding and Implementing the 2016 Amsterdam Consensus. Mod. Pathol. 2021;34:1074–1092. doi: 10.1038/s41379-021-00747-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Fadl S., Moshiri M., Fligner C.L., Katz D.S., Dighe M. Placental Imaging: Normal Appearance with Review of Pathologic Findings. RadioGraphics. 2017;37:979–998. doi: 10.1148/rg.2017160155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Hernandez-Andrade E., Huntley E.S., Bartal M.F., Soto-Torres E.E., Tirosh D., Jaiman S., Johnson A. Doppler Evaluation of Normal and Abnormal Placenta. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2022;60:28–41. doi: 10.1002/uog.24816. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Orlando N.A., Mumford K., Toscano M., Johnson J., Gomez E.N. Multiple Intraplacental Hematomas Preceding Clinical Deterioration in Preeclampsia with Severe Features: A Case Report. Radiol. Case Rep. 2025;20:4373–4380. doi: 10.1016/j.radcr.2025.05.045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Fitzgerald B., Shannon P., Kingdom J., Keating S. Rounded Intraplacental Haematomas Due to Decidual Vasculopathy Have a Distinctive Morphology. J. Clin. Pathol. 2011;64:729–732. doi: 10.1136/jcp.2010.087916. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Predoi C.G., Grigoriu C., Vladescu R., Mihart A.E. Placental Damages in Preeclampsia—From Ultrasound Images to Histopathological Findings. J. Med. Life. 2015;8:62–65. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Fadl S.A., Linnau K.F., Dighe M.K. Placental Abruption and Hemorrhage-Review of Imaging Appearance. Emerg. Radiol. 2019;26:87–97. doi: 10.1007/s10140-018-1638-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Oyelese Y., Litman E., Hecht J.L., Hernandez-Andrade E., Kinzler W.L. Hemorrhagic Placental Lesions on Ultrasound: A Continuum of Placental Abruption. J. Perinat. Med. 2025;53:741–748. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2024-0564. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Proctor L.K., Whittle W.L., Keating S., Viero S., Kingdom J.C.P. Pathologic Basis of Echogenic Cystic Lesions in the Human Placenta: Role of Ultrasound-Guided Wire Localization. Placenta. 2010;31:1111–1115. doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2010.10.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Silver R.M. Abnormal Placentation: Placenta Previa, Vasa Previa, and Placenta Accreta. Obstet. Gynecol. 2015;126:654–668. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Rasmussen A.S., Stæhr-Hansen E., Lauridsen H., Uldbjerg N., Pedersen M. MR Angiography Demonstrates a Positive Correlation between Placental Blood Vessel Volume and Fetal Size. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 2014;290:1127–1131. doi: 10.1007/s00404-014-3341-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Kim H.-S., Jang M.-H., Koo Y.-J., Lee D.-H. Subchorionic Placental Cyst in a Woman with Fetal Growth Restriction: A Case Report and Review of the Literature. J. Clin. Med. 2025;14:6698. doi: 10.3390/jcm14196698. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Deihl T.E., Abiad M., Sambatur E., Zargarzadeh N., Chmait R.H., Shamshirsaz A.A., Emery S.P. Placental Chorangiomas: Diagnostic Challenges and Contemporary Approaches to Fetal Care. Pregnancy. 2026;2:e70181. doi: 10.1002/pmf2.70181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Ma H., Liu Z., Ruan J. Placental Chorioangioma and Pregnancy Outcome: A Ten-Year Retrospective Study in a Tertiary Referral Centre. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023;23:381. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05719-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Rayne S.C., Kraus F.T. Placental Thrombi and Other Vascular Lesions: Classification, Morphology, and Clinical Correlations. Pathol. Res. Pract. 1993;189:2–17. doi: 10.1016/S0344-0338(11)80111-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Pena-Burgos E.M., Duyos-Mateo I., Hato-Salmón L., Antolín-Alvarado E., Bravo Arribas C., De León-Luis J.A., Regojo-Zapata R.M. Massive Subchorionic Thrombohematoma (Breus’ Mole): An Exceedingly Rare Placental Disorder—Case Series and Systematic Review. Placenta. 2025;168:276–287. doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2025.06.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Zalel Y., Weisz B., Gamzu R., Schiff E., Shalmon B., Achiron R. Chorioangiomas of the Placenta: Sonographic and Doppler Flow Characteristics. J. Ultrasound Med. 2002;21:909–913. doi: 10.7863/jum.2002.21.8.909. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Fan M., Skupski D.W. Placental Chorioangioma: Literature Review. J. Perinat. Med. 2014;42:273–279. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2013-0170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Reis N.S.V., Brizot M.L., Schultz R., Nomura R.M.Y., Zugaib M. Placental Lakes on Sonographic Examination: Correlation with Obstetric Outcome and Pathologic Findings. J. Clin. Ultrasound. 2005;33:67–71. doi: 10.1002/jcu.20086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Jauniaux E., Zosmer N., D’Antonio F., Hussein A.M. Placental Lakes vs Lacunae: Spot the Differences. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2024;63:173–180. doi: 10.1002/uog.27453. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Choi-Klier J., Masters S., Lewis D., Taylor K., Magann E.F. What Is the Significance of Placental Lakes in Pregnancy? A Historic Literature Review. J. Clin. Med. 2025;14:1260. doi: 10.3390/jcm14041260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Agarwal N., Papanna R., Bergh E.P., Hernandez-Andrade E., Backley S., Salazar A., Johnson A., Espinoza J. Management of Large Placental Chorioangioma: Two-Port Laser Approach for Fetal Intervention. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2023;62:882–890. doi: 10.1002/uog.26307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Sun X., Zhao H., Hao J., Lu L., Gu Y. Clinicopathological Characteristics of Placental Chorioangioma: A Clinicopathological Study of 77 Cases. Ann. Diagn. Pathol. 2022;57:151873. doi: 10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2021.151873. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.LeMoine F., Agarwal N., Naranjo S., Johnson A., Backley S., Bergh E.P., Lagos G.V., Hernandez-Andrade E., Papanna R., Espinoza J. Diagnosis and Management of Large Placental Chorioangiomas. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2025;102:102644. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2025.102644. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Abdalla N., Piórkowski R., Stanirowski P., Pazura M., Cendrowski K., Sawicki W. Can Ultrasound Be Helpful in Selecting Optimal Management Methods for Pregnancies Complicated by Placental Non-Trophpblastic Tumors? J. Ultrason. 2017;17:116–122. doi: 10.15557/JoU.2017.0017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Buca D., Iacovella C., Khalil A., Rizzo G., Sirotkina M., Makatsariya A., Liberati M., Silvi C., Acharya G., D’Antonio F. Perinatal Outcome of Pregnancies Complicated by Placental Chorioangioma: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2020;55:441–449. doi: 10.1002/uog.20304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Zhang P., Kabakibi L., Gonzalez K. Intervillous Thrombus Is Independently Associated with Placental Infarct and Single Umbilical Artery as Well as Fetal Inflammatory Response: Implication of Fetal Vascular Flow in Pathogenesis. Pediatr. Dev. Pathol. 2026;29:51–57. doi: 10.1177/10935266251385782. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Morgen E.K., Fitzgerald B., Keating S. Intervillous Thrombosis. In: Khong T.Y., Mooney E.E., Nikkels P.G.J., Morgan T.K., Gordijn S.J., editors. Pathology of the Placenta: A Practical Guide. Springer International Publishing; Cham, Switzerland: 2019. pp. 67–76. [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Goldstein J.A., Nateghi R., Irmakci I., Cooper L.A.D. Machine Learning Classification of Placental Villous Infarction, Perivillous Fibrin Deposition, and Intervillous Thrombus. Placenta. 2023;135:43–50. doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2023.03.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Turan O.M., Bozkurt S., Turan S. Imaging of the Placenta. Clin. Obstet. Gynecol. 2025;68:72–85. doi: 10.1097/grf.0000000000000905. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Liu Y., Tong A., Qi X. A Large Subchorionic Hematoma in Pregnancy. Medicine. 2020;99:e20280. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000020280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Pan S., Lan Y., Zhou Y., Chen B., Zhou F., Dai D., Hua Y. Associations between the Size and Duration of Asymptomatic Subchorionic Hematoma and Pregnancy Outcomes in Women with Singleton Pregnancies. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023;23:555. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05831-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Yan X., Xu H., Li J., Xu Z., Niu Y., Wang Y. Subchorionic Hematoma and Risk of Preterm Delivery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. MFM. 2023;5:100791. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2022.100791. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.


Articles from Diagnostics are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES