Skip to main content
Wiley Open Access Collection logoLink to Wiley Open Access Collection
. 2026 Sep 13;252(4):1413–1431. doi: 10.1111/nph.71561

Functional memory of drought affects leaf chemical defenses and microbial interactions in aspen

Aubrey M Hawks 1, Jaycie C Fickle 1, Kelly L Kerr 1,2, Dale L Forrister 1,3, Allison M Perkins 1, Efthymia Symeonidi 1, Madelyn Allen 1, Cannon Fehrenbach 1, Hsiao‐Nung Chen 4, Richard L Lindroth 5, William R L Anderegg 1,✉,#, Talia L Karasov 1,✉,#
PMCID: PMC13669813  PMID: 42732460

Summary

  • Drought is an important driver of tree mortality, but its long‐term impacts on trait expression remain poorly understood. Leaves are a key interface at which trees respond to abiotic stress, and foliar traits such as chemical defenses and microbial communities may play a role in determining post‐drought resilience. We tested whether prior‐year drought leaves a persistent imprint on leaf traits in Populus tremuloides Michx.

  • Using a 3‐year common garden experiment with controlled water limitation, we measured two classes of defensive phenolics—salicinoid phenolic glycosides (SPGs) and condensed tannins (CTs)—alongside foliar fungal community composition.

  • SPG concentrations increased and CTs declined in response to prior‐year drought, with no evidence of a trade‐off between increased allocation to defensive chemistry and growth. Higher SPG concentrations were associated with reduced canopy damage across treatments, while CT‐damaged canopy relationships depended on prior‐year drought conditions. The relative abundance of pathogen‐capable fungi increased under drought but declined with increasing SPG concentrations, consistent with the possibility that drought legacy effects on foliar chemistry extend to microbial colonization.

  • These results indicate that drought‐induced shifts in foliar chemistry can persist beyond the drought period and may continue to influence plant performance and biotic interactions, with implications for post‐drought resilience.

Keywords: aspen, chemical defense, drought, fungi, legacy, microbiome


Experimental design of the common garden study.

graphic file with name NPH-252-1413-g003.webp

Introduction

Hotter, drier, and more prolonged droughts linked to climate change are now recognized as a dominant driver of tree mortality, with impacts that can extend for years after drought conditions subside (Brodribb et al., 2020; Hammond et al., 2022; Gazol et al., 2025). Despite advances in understanding many of the physiological factors contributing to tree mortality, significant gaps remain between model predictions and observed patterns of forest die‐off (Trugman et al., 2021; Hartmann et al., 2022). Two factors are increasingly recognized as central to this limitation: high variation at the level of individual trees, such as genetic variation in stress‐related traits, differences in past stress exposure or microclimate, and interactions with biotic agents, including foliar pests and pathogens (Anderegg et al., 2015; Hartmann et al., 2018; Trugman et al., 2021). Because foliar traits mediate interactions with both abiotic stressors and biotic agents, they may be critical for understanding drought‐driven mortality. Among these, defensive chemistry and foliar microbial communities stand out as traits that directly influence how trees interact with pests, pathogens, and stress (Nakabayashi & Saito, 2015; Trivedi et al., 2020). These dynamics are insufficiently represented in current models, largely because we lack mechanistic understanding of how drought alters tree–biotic interactions and how those interactions amplify or dampen mortality risk (Huang et al., 2020). Key unknowns are how drought reshapes leaf chemistry and microbial communities, how persistent these changes are, and whether these factors contribute to tree resilience or vulnerability post‐drought.

Leaves are a critical interface where trees encounter both abiotic stress and biotic agents, and traits expressed there are likely to mediate how drought influences tree performance. Plants invest substantial resources in specialized metabolites – up to 5% of their photosynthate and as much as 20% of available nitrogen (Gleadow et al., 1998; Burns et al., 2002; Huang et al., 2019) – despite the associated costs to growth, because these compounds improve stress tolerance and defense (Cole et al., 2016; Cope et al., 2021). By influencing herbivores, microbial colonization, litter decomposition, and nutrient cycling, these compounds generate cascading ecological effects (Schweitzer et al., 2008; Rubert‐Nason & Lindroth, 2021; Kelly et al., 2010; Winder et al., 2013). Many of the most abundant plant metabolites are antioxidants that mitigate abiotic stress directly by scavenging reactive oxygen species during drought (Munné‐Bosch & Alegre, 2000; Nakabayashi & Saito, 2015; Gourlay et al., 2022; Moroldo et al., 2024). Foliar microbes, in turn, can shape tree health by enhancing stress tolerance or, conversely, by acting as opportunistic pathogens (Trivedi et al., 2020; Cambon et al., 2022; Singh et al., 2023). Their composition reflects both environmental filtering and host traits, including chemical defenses, positioning chemistry and microbes as potentially intersecting mediators of drought outcomes and community composition (Forrister et al., 2019).

Evidence that drought influences allocation to specialized metabolites comes from a wide range of studies, with stronger experimental support in crop species than in trees. Shifts in terpenes and phenolics have been measured following short periods of drought, though the magnitude and direction of responses vary with drought severity and plant species (Koricheva et al., 1998; Munné‐Bosch & Alegre, 2000; Gerson & Kelsey, 2004; Nogués et al., 2014; Rivas‐Ubach et al., 2014; Kleiber et al., 2017; Piasecka et al., 2017; Shamloo et al., 2017; Holopainen et al., 2018; Sarker & Oba, 2018; Khaleghi et al., 2019). In conifers, such shifts can have direct ecological consequences; for example, decreases in monoterpene concentrations in Pinus edulis have been associated with increased bark beetle attack during drought (Gaylord et al., 2013; Thompson et al., 2024; Malone et al., 2025). More recent research suggests the potential for longer term impacts of severe drought stress. Laoué et al. (2024) found reduced flavanol allocation in Quercus pubescens that persisted for up to 2 yr, and (Eisenring et al., 2024) documented lasting metabolomic shifts in Fagus sylvatica following drought‐induced defoliation.

In deciduous trees, drought carry‐over effects are particularly intriguing because the foliage directly exposed to drought is shed and replaced each year. Thus, persistence in this context does not imply an indefinite response, but rather that drought‐associated changes remain detectable in newly produced leaves during subsequent growing seasons after the original drought‐affected foliage has been replaced. The above‐mentioned studies, conducted under field and semi‐natural conditions, indicate that drought may have a persistent effect on defensive chemistry. Replicated and randomized experiments are needed to assess whether drought consistently reshapes defensive chemistry, to clarify the mechanisms driving these responses, and to determine whether such changes translate into altered biotic interactions and ultimately, performance outcomes.

Evidence that drought alters plant‐associated microbial communities is accumulating rapidly, and water availability is emerging as a major determinant of the leaf microbiome (Chen et al., 2021; Zhu et al., 2022; Karasov et al., 2024). These effects are less well documented in forest trees, though rainfall‐exclusion experiments in Quercus ilex have reported increased bacterial and fungal diversity in the phyllosphere following drought (Peñuelas et al., 2012; Rico et al., 2014). In Populus deltoides, drought altered microbial communities in a sex‐dependent manner, with female trees hosting assemblages more resilient to pathogen infection (Lin et al., 2023). Shifts have also been reported in conifers, where changes in bacterial communities were observed under rain exclusion (Khlifa et al., 2025). Longer term drought effects on forest microbial communities have been documented in soils, but their persistence in foliage is much less certain (Hopkins et al., 2024; Jaeger et al., 2024). Moreover, the links between drought, foliar chemistry, and microbial colonization remain poorly understood.

We examined how drought history shapes specialized metabolism and foliar microbial communities using quaking aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.), a widely distributed and chemically well‐characterized model for studying plant defense and plant–microbe interactions in forest ecosystems. Aspen produce two major classes of phenolic specialized metabolites – salicinoid phenolic glycosides (SPGs) and condensed tannins (CTs) – which are involved in both biotic and abiotic interactions. SPGs are salicylate derivatives largely restricted to the Salicaceae (e.g. Populus and Salix), while CTs (also known as proanthocyanidins) are flavan‐3‐ol polymers found broadly across plant taxa (Rubert‐Nason & Lindroth, 2021). In aspen, allocation to SPGs and CTs varies widely. Each can range from < 1% to over 30% of leaf dry weight. Both are products of the phenylpropanoid pathway, and their concentrations are often inversely correlated, suggesting a resource‐based trade‐off driven by shared biosynthetic precursors.

SPGs are strongly associated with herbivore deterrence: for example, each 1% increase in SPG leaf dry weight reduces female spongy moth larval weight by c. 73.9 mg (0.5%) and extends development time by 1.1 d (Hemming & Lindroth, 1995). Though they have been shown to reduce food preference in chrysomelid beetles, CTs are thought to have limited effects on herbivores. Their associations with herbivores are occasionally positive and may be explained by higher levels of SPGs in individuals with lower allocation to CTs (Gruppe et al., 1999; Rubert‐Nason & Lindroth, 2021).

Less is known about how these compounds influence microbial communities in Salicaceae. Existing work has focused primarily on specific pathogen systems, particularly rust fungi in the genus Melampspora. Elevated SPG concentrations have been associated with reduced infection severity in Salix myrsinifolia although evidence remains mixed (Hakulinen, 1998; Hakulinen & Julkunen‐Tiitto 2008; Maupetit et al., 2018). Across plant species, CTs have been found to be antimicrobial (Li et al., 2022; Ewing et al., 2024; Gupta et al., 2025; Mattos et al., 2025), though direct evidence in Salicaceae is more limited. Experimental work has shown that they can inhibit Melampspora larici‐populina; at 0.5 mg ml−1 of CTs reduced spore germination by 4.2‐fold in vitro (Ullah et al., 2017). More recently, bacterial communities in Populus nigra tissues with higher concentrations of secondary metabolites were found to be enriched for traits that may be related to tolerance to the chemical environment (Bose et al., 2025).

Natural surveys and experimental manipulations of foliar communities in Populus suggest that microbial assemblages are shaped by environmental conditions, with drier sites often harboring distinct community profiles (Lin et al., 2023; Van Nuland et al., 2023). These shifts may arise through multiple, nonmutually exclusive mechanisms, including direct effects of abiotic stress on microbial survival and colonization, as well as indirect, host‐mediated changes in leaf traits. If microbial taxa differ in their responses to phenolic compounds, host chemistry could act as a filter on microbial communities, such that shifts in chemical investment under environmental stress could influence community restructuring. Moreover, if drought‐induced chemical changes persist across years, they may continue to shape microbial communities after drought has ended.

We utilized a 3‐yr common garden drought experiment established by Kerr et al. to test whether drought leaves a legacy in phenolic chemistry, whether these changes have functional consequences for aspen performance and whether drought exerts direct or indirect effects on foliar microbial communities (Fig. 1; Kerr et al., 2023; Fickle et al., 2025). From 2021 to 2023, two blocks each were maintained under consistent control (CCC) or drought (DDD) conditions. An additional three blocks each simulated shorter drought periods (CDD) or recovery years between droughts (DCD; Fig. 1C). We sampled leaves at peak drought each year to address the following questions: (1) Does drought alter the chemical profile of aspen leaves, and do these effects persist into subsequent growing seasons? (2) Are drought‐associated changes in foliar chemistry associated with variation in growth and canopy condition? (3) Do contrasting drought histories affect foliar microbial communities and (4) Are drought‐associated shifts in SPG or CT concentrations linked to differences in foliar fungal community composition?

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Experimental design of the common garden study. Field sites were established at locations in the Dixie (DNF), San Juan (SJNF), Uncompahgre (UNCO), White River (WR), and Uinta (UNT) National Forests across Utah and Colorado, USA (a). Red points mark site locations. Root stock collected from multiple stands of Populus tremuloides at each site was propagated and planted into randomized common garden blocks (b). From 2021 to 2023, trees in the common garden received either control or drought treatments from June to September (c). Paired samples were collected for analysis of specialized metabolites and microbial communities (b). Treatment histories are indicated by letter codes, where each letter represents a single year (C, control; D, drought), as shown by water icons. Labels are presented as paired abbreviations (e.g. DC/DCD), where the first term (DC) denotes the 2‐yr treatment history before the 2022 sampling (2021–2022) and the second term (DCD) indicates the full 3‐yr treatment history for the 2023 sampling (2021–2023). Colors and abbreviations are used consistently across subsequent figures. Parts of (b) and (c) were created with BioRender (Karasov, T. (2026) https://BioRender.com/h23yjqv).

Materials and Methods

Experimental design

Our study was conducted within the clonal quaking aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.) field–common garden experiment established by Kerr et al. (2023) and further characterized by Fickle et al. (2026). This study system combines long‐term observations of natural populations with controlled drought manipulations applied in a common garden to propagated clones derived from the same individuals (Fig. 1). We used this framework to examine how contrasting drought histories shape foliar chemistry and fungal communities. Additional details regarding genotype origin, propagation, garden establishment, and drought treatment implementation are provided in Supporting Information Methods S1 and in Kerr et al. (2023).

Field sites

Field sites were identified in the Dixie (DNF), San Juan (SJNF), Uncompahgre (UNCO), White River (WR), and Uinta (UNT) National Forests using the United States Forest Service Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA) Database. Site selection followed Kerr et al. (2023), targeting a natural gradient in mean annual temperature (2.4–5.0°C) and precipitation (338–662 mm) while minimizing variation in elevation (c. 3000 m) and aspect (south‐facing).

At each site, plots were established on uniform slopes of similar steepness to reduce topographic effects on soil moisture. A central GPS reference point was established within each clonal stand, and five mature trees were selected for long‐term monitoring within an 18 m radius. Genotypic identity was verified using PCR amplification of eight microsatellite markers (Mock et al., 2012).

Common garden

Clonal genotypes derived from field‐collected rootstock were propagated and established in a common garden at the University of Utah in 2020 (Kerr et al., 2023). The garden consisted of 10 randomized blocks, each containing a 6 × 6 grid of plants spaced 50 cm apart (360 individuals total). Genotypes were spatially randomized across blocks.

In 2021, blocks were randomly assigned to control or drought treatments. After an initial establishment period under full watering, drought treatments received reduced irrigation (50% then 25% of control) to achieve target predawn water potentials of c. −1.5 MPa, corresponding to moderate to severe drought stress (Love et al., 2019). Treatment assignments were modified in subsequent years to generate variation in drought history. In 2022, a subset of blocks retained their initial treatment, while others were switched to simulate recovery or short‐term drought (Fig. 1). In 2023, all noncontrol blocks received drought treatment. Because the experiment was designed to emphasize responses to changing water availability, treatment trajectories involving transitions between DCD and CDD were represented by three blocks each, whereas continuously watered (CCC) and repeated drought (DDD) trajectories were represented by two blocks each.

Because natural summer rainfall reduced drought severity in 2021, rain exclusion was implemented in 2022–2023 using temporary overhead canopies to maintain treatment separation. Canopies were placed over drought beds only during rainfall events and removed once precipitation ceased, thereby limiting potential microclimatic effects associated with permanent rain shelters. Drought intensity was monitored using weekly measurements of predawn and midday leaf water potential (Fickle et al., 2026).

Chemical quantification

Leaf sampling and processing

Leaves for quantification of phenolic compounds were collected from the common garden in late August 2022 and 2023 at peak drought stress before senescence. All sampling was completed within 90 min at ambient temperatures below 30°C, and leaves were shaded during collection. One to two mature leaves per plant were sampled from mid‐canopy height. Leaves were selected to be representative of each individual and were not chosen based on visible disease symptoms. Samples were dried on silica gel in the dark at 25°C for 48 h, followed by vacuum centrifugation at 30°C for ≥ 12 h. Dried samples were stored on silica gel in airtight bags at −20°C until analysis. Leaves were transferred to 2‐ml tubes and homogenized with glass beads using a FastPrep system (4 m s−1, 20 s). Subsamples (c. 15 mg) were weighed for SPG and CT quantification.

SPG extraction and quantification

SPGs were extracted in methanol containing 0.01% β‐resorcylic acid and quantified via UPLC‐MS following Rubert‐Nason et al. (2017). Analytical standards for salicortin and tremulacin were provided by R. Lindroth and purified as described in Rubert‐Nason et al. (2018). Salicin was obtained commercially (≥ 99% purity; cat. no.: S0625; Sigma‐Aldrich).

Peak detection and integration were performed in MZmine v.4.3 via mzWizard using the following parameters: noise threshold (MS1) = 1E3; minimum feature height = 3.0E3; m/z tolerance = 0.02 (scan‐to‐scan), 0.015 (intra‐sample), and 0.02 (sample‐to‐sample); retention time range = 0.03–22.50 min; maximum peaks per chromatogram = 15; minimum consecutive scans = 4; approximate feature FWHM = 0.05 min; retention time tolerance = 0.2 min (intra‐ and inter‐sample; Schmid et al., 2023).

To correct for analytical variation, duplicate extractions from a bulk aspen standard were included every 12 samples. Between‐batch variation was corrected by scaling concentrations using the ratio of the overall mean of the first two process standard injections to the batch‐specific mean. Within‐batch drift was corrected by fitting a linear model to process standard concentrations as a function of run order and applying the inverse correction to all samples.

SPG concentrations were calculated using standard curves and converted to percent dry weight as follows:

%DW=extractionvol.×dilution factor×1.09×100×sample concentrationsample start weightg×1000

where 1.09 is an empirically determined correction factor for extraction efficiency.

CT extraction and quantification

CTs were extracted in 70% acetone containing 0.01% ascorbic acid and quantified using the acid‐butanol colorimetric assay (Porter et al., 1985). Extracts were mixed with 95 : 5 butanol : HCl containing ferric ammonium sulfate and incubated at 95°C for 40 min. Absorbance was measured at 550 nm. Procyanidin B2 (≥ 90% purity; Sigma‐Aldrich, Cat. No. 42157) was used as the analytical standard.

Interannual change in chemistry

Interannual changes in SPGs and CTs were calculated by pairing samples across the years 2022 and 2023 and subtracting 2022 values from 2023 values for individuals with measurements in both years (n = 259).

Tree growth and canopy damage

Relative growth rates (RGR) were calculated from annual stem diameter increments as described in Fickle et al. (2026). Approximately half of the trees in the common garden (n = 143) were harvested in June 2024, dried, and processed for high‐resolution stem cross‐sections. Annual ring boundaries were identified from scanned, polished stem disks and measured in ImageJ. For each individual, annual stem diameters were extracted for successive growth years from 2020 to 2024, and RGR was calculated as the relative change in stem diameter between the beginning and end of each growing season. Analyses in this study focused on RGR for the 2022–2023 growth year.

Canopy damage was scored in early September of each year based on a visual assessment of leaf condition across the entire canopy. This timing was chosen to capture the cumulative effects of drought stress while minimizing confounding effects of seasonal senescence. Leaf tissue showing chlorosis, necrosis, or complete loss (‘missingness’) was classified as damaged. For each tree, the proportion of canopy damaged was recorded as the proportion of canopy leaves affected.

Microbial community characterization

Sampling and processing

Microbial community sampling was conducted concurrently with chemical sampling. To minimize diel variation in microbiome composition, leaves were collected in the morning (7:00 h–10:00 h) over 3–4 consecutive days. Equal numbers of samples were randomly selected from each plot on each day. Single leaves were clipped from mid‐canopy height into sterile tubes. As with chemical sampling, leaves were selected to be representative of each individual and were not chosen based on visible disease symptoms. Samples were washed in the field with 4–5 ml of 0.1% Tween‐20 solution, rinsed thoroughly with sterile deionized water, flash‐frozen on dry ice, and stored at −80°C.

At field sites, sampling occurred from late July to early September 2022 and over five consecutive days in mid‐July 2023. For each tree, three to four branches were collected using a 20‐gauge shotgun, and four leaves per branch were clipped into sterile tubes, washed, and stored as described above.

DNA extraction

DNA and RNA were co‐extracted from whole frozen leaves using a modified CTAB‐based protocol (Chang et al., 1993; Sasi et al., 2023; Lundberg et al., 2025). Although RNA sequencing data are not included in this analysis, the co‐extraction procedure is described here because it influenced the DNA extraction method. Leaves were ground in liquid nitrogen using sterile foil‐lined mortars and pestles and transferred to 2‐ml microcentrifuge tubes. Cell lysis was performed in CTAB buffer (100 mM Tris–HCl pH 8.0, 1.4 M NaCl, 20 mM EDTA, 2% CTAB, 2% polyvinylpyrrolidone K30, 2% β‐mercaptoethanol, 100 μg ml−1 Proteinase K) at 65°C for 60 min.

Nucleic acids were extracted using 24 : 1 chloroform:isoamyl alcohol and purified through two rounds of extraction. The aqueous phase was split, with 250 μl reserved for RNA extraction. DNA was precipitated with NaCl, potassium acetate, and isopropanol, incubated at −20°C overnight, centrifuged at 3200  g for 45 min, washed with 80% ethanol, dried, and resuspended in nuclease‐free water.

Amplicon sequencing

The ITS1 region was amplified using a two‐step PCR protocol with frameshifting primers following Regalado et al. (2020) and Lundberg et al. (2013), excluding blocking oligos. Primer sequences are provided in Table S1.

First‐round PCR reactions (60 μl total volume) contained ThermoPol buffer (1×; New Englad Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA), forward and reverse primers (0.08 μM), dNTPs (0.2 mM), Taq DNA polymerase, and template DNA (5 μl). Reactions were split across three plates and run in triplicate under the following conditions: 94°C for 2 min; 10 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 55°C for 30 s, 72°C for 30 s; and 72°C for 3 min.

Amplified DNA was pooled and cleaned using 1 : 1 SPRI beads before a second PCR. Second‐round PCR reactions (25 μl) used Q5 polymerase with 1× Q5 buffer, 0.48 mM dNTPs, 0.5 μM forward primers and 0.25 μM barcoded reverse primers. Thermal cycling conditions were: 94°C for 1 min; 25 cycles of 94°C for 20 s, 60°C for 30 s, 72°C for 30 s; and a final extension at 72°C for 2 min.

Amplicon size (c. 400–450 bp) and adapter incorporation were verified by agarose gel electrophoresis. Amplicons were pooled by plate, cleaned using a 1 : 1.2 SPRI bead ratio, eluted, concentrated 10× at 40°C via vacuum centrifugation, and size‐selected (300–750 bp) using a BluePippin system (1.5% gel). Libraries were sequenced on an Illumina MiSeq using a v.3 600‐cycle kit.

Sequence processing and filtering

Reads were demultiplexed and adapters trimmed using custom scripts (Karasov, 2023). Reads were filtered and denoised without merging using DADA2 (parameters: maxN = 0, maxEE = 2, truncQ = 2, minLen = 50; Callahan et al., 2016).

Taxonomic assignment was performed on forward reads using the UNITE database v.9.0 general Fasta release (Abarenkov et al., 2024). ASVs were retained if classified as fungi at the family level or lower. Samples with fewer than 500 reads and ASVs detected in fewer than three samples were excluded before analysis. No rarefaction was performed, consistent with recommendations underlying the phyloseq framework, because rarefaction discards valid observations and can reduce precision and statistical power (McMurdie & Holmes, 2013). Alpha diversity metrics were calculated from the filtered dataset, whereas Bray–Curtis dissimilarities and subsequent PERMANOVA and dbRDA analyses were performed using relative abundance data. Differential abundance analyses were conducted using unrarefied count data.

Community classification and analysis framework

Microbial community analyses were initially conducted on the full dataset to characterize overall structure. Subsequent analyses focused on pathogen‐capable taxa to evaluate associations with drought and host chemistry. Genera were classified using the FungalTraits database (Põlme et al., 2020), supplemented by manual curation. The term ‘pathogen‐capable’ refers to taxa classified as plant pathogens in FungalTraits, including opportunistic pathogens.

Statistical analyses

All analyses were conducted in R (v.4.5.2).

Effects of drought on foliar chemistry

Bray–Curtis dissimilarities were calculated from the full table of UPLC results normalized by sample weight using vegdist (vegan v.2.6.10). Principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) was performed using pcoa (ape v.5.8.1; Paradis, Claude & Strimmer, 2004), and treatment groups were compared using permanova (adonis2, vegan; Oksanen et al., 2025).

To evaluate drought effects on foliar chemistry, we fit linear mixed‐effects models using lme4 (v.1.1.36; Bates et al., 2015). Models included prior‐year treatment as a fixed effect and genotype as a random intercept:

yij=β0+β1Treatmentj+bgenotypei+εij

where yij is the metabolite concentration for individual i in treatment group j, Treatmentj is drought treatment group, bgenotypei~N0σgenotype2 is the random intercept for genotype, and εij~N0σ2 is the residual error.

Separate models were fit for individual SPGs, total SPGs, CTs, and interannual changes in these traits. Interaction terms between genotype and treatment were not included because genotypes were not fully replicated across treatments, resulting in singular model fits and preventing reliable estimation of interaction effects.

Model assumptions were evaluated using Q–Q plots and residual‐fitted plots. Minor deviations from normality were observed but did not affect inference. Homoscedasticity and random effect distributions were acceptable.

Significance of fixed effects was evaluated using Type III ANOVA (car v.3.1.3). Post hoc comparisons were conducted usingemmeans (v.1.10.7) with Tukey correction (Lenth, 2025).

Variance explained was calculated using the partr2 package (v.0.9.2; Stoffel et al., 2021). Both Marginal and Conditional R 2 were calculated for each model. Marginal R 2 was used to estimate fixed effects (treatment), and the difference between conditional R 2 and marginal R 2 isolated the variance explained by genotype.

Associations between chemistry and performance

Growth (RGR) was analyzed using linear models, including changes in foliar chemistry (ΔSPGs, ΔCTs, Δtotal phenolics) and drought treatment variables. Interaction terms were included where biologically motivated.

Model assumptions were evaluated using Q–Q plots, residual‐fitted plots, and Breusch–Pagan tests. All models met assumptions, with minor deviations in upper tails. Heteroskedasticity‐consistent (HC3) SE were reported. A sensitivity analysis excluding a single extreme SPG value was also used to test the robustness of results.

Effects on canopy damage (2023) were analyzed using beta regression implemented in glmmtmb (v.1.1.14; McGillycuddy et al., 2025). Models included foliar chemistry and drought treatment as fixed effects, with dispersion allowed to vary by treatment group.

Model diagnostics were conducted using dharma (v.0.4.7; Hartig, 2026), which indicated no evidence of overdispersion or zero inflation.

Candidate models included treatment‐only, chemistry‐only, additive, and interaction models. Model selection was conducted using likelihood ratio tests and AICc (aiccmodavg v.2.3.4; Mazerolle, 2023).

For additive models, marginal effects were estimated using marginaleffects (v.0.32.0; Arel‐Bundock et al., 2024). For interaction models, treatment‐specific slopes were evaluated using emtrends, and predictions were generated using estimated marginal means.

Fungal community composition

Fungal community composition was analyzed in R using phyloseq (v.1.54.0) and vegan (McMurdie & Holmes, 2013). Shannon diversity was calculated using estimate_richness. Diversity differences were evaluated using linear models with site as a predictor.

Bray–Curtis dissimilarities were calculated using vegdist, and dbRDA was conducted using capscale (phyloseq). Models included treatment group, SPGs, and CTs as predictors, with garden block included as a conditioning variable. Significance was assessed using permutation tests (anova.cca, 999 permutations), and collinearity was evaluated using variance inflation factors (vif.cca).

Modeling pathogen‐capable taxa

The proportion of pathogen reads per sample was modeled using beta‐binomial GLMMs implemented in glmmTMB:

logitpi=β0+β1SPGi+β2Droughti+bblocki

where pi is the proportion of pathogen reads, SPGi is scaled total SPG concentration, Droughti is current‐year drought treatment, and bblocki~N0σblock2 represents a random intercept for garden block.

Model diagnostics using DHARMa indicated no evidence of overdispersion or zero inflation.

Genus‐level responses to drought were modeled using beta‐binomial GLMMs for each genus:

logitpij=β0+β2Droughti+bblocki

where pij is the genus‐level relative abundance of genus i in sample j, Droughti is current‐year drought treatment, and bblocki~N0σblock2 represents a random intercept for garden block.

Significant genera (P < 0.05) were identified based on model coefficients and compared with observed changes in relative abundance.

To compare experimental and field responses, genus‐level effect sizes were calculated as log‐odds contrasts and compared using variance‐weighted linear models, with weights defined as the inverse of the combined variance of the drought and field estimates:

w=1SEdrought2+SEfield2

where w is the weight applied to each observation. Analyses were restricted to genera showing significant drought responses in the common garden.

Associations between taxa and host chemistry

For drought‐responsive genera, associations with host chemistry were evaluated using genus‐specific beta‐binomial GLMMs, including chemistry and drought as fixed effects and block as a random effect:

logitpij=β0+β1Chemi+β2Droughti+bblocki

where pij is the proportion of reads assigned to genus i in sample j, Chemi is the scaled measure of a single host chemistry class (either total SPGs or CTs), Droughti is current‐year drought treatment and bblocki~N0σblock2 is a random intercept for garden block.

To evaluate whether Cladosporium enrichment was associated with declining canopy condition, we modeled Cladosporium relative abundance as a function of the proportion of canopy damaged while accounting for drought treatment and block structure using a beta‐binomial generalized linear mixed model:

logitpi=β0+β1Canopyi+β2Droughti+bblocki

where pi is the relative abundance of Cladosporium in sample i, Canopyi is the proportion of canopy damaged, Droughti is current‐year drought treatment and bblocki~N0σblock2 is a random intercept for garden block.

ASV‐level differential abundance

Differential abundance was assessed using deseq2 (v.1.46.0; Love et al., 2014) with likelihood ratio tests and garden block included as a covariate. Dispersions were estimated using DESeq2's empirical Bayes approach, and dispersion‐mean relationships were visually inspected. Analyses focused on the strongest treatment contrast (CCC vs DDD), and P‐values were adjusted using the Benjamini–Hochberg (BH) method.

To facilitate ecological interpretation, FungalTraits genus‐level classifications were used to filter results to ASVs assigned to pathogen‐capable genera. This subset was selected to enable more interpretable comparisons of taxa likely to respond to host stress, rather than to exclude other ecologically relevant groups.

Because DESeq2 operates on count data and does not explicitly model proportional responses, ASV‐level results were compared with genus‐level and community‐level responses estimated using beta‐binomial GLMMs applied to focal treatment contrasts. Concordance between approaches was evaluated based on directional agreement of effect estimates (i.e. concordance in the sign of log2 fold changes and GLMM coefficients) and Spearman rank correlation of effect sizes.

Results

Prior‐year drought affects production of SPGs and CTs

We first asked whether foliar chemical profiles differed among drought treatments and whether this variation was associated with the focal SPG class. In 2022, PCoA1 of the UPLC data captured 67.8% of variation, with most contributors corresponding to peaks for the four major SPGs: salicin, salicortin, tremulacin, and tremuloidin (Fig. S1a). PCoA1 from 2023 (68.1% of variance) was also dominated by SPGs (Fig. S1b). While there was no significant separation between treatment groups in 2022, in 2023, trees experiencing two or three consecutive years of drought (CDD, DDD) separated from those with alternating drought and normal watering (DCD, CCC; P = 0.002 vs CCC, 0.024 and 0.002 vs DCD for CDD and DDD, respectively). DCD also separated from CCC (P = 0.024). PC2 described an additional 8.4% (2022) and 6.7% (2023) of variance and was associated with larger, more polar compounds that eluted early in the gradient.

Having observed separation of treatment groups along the axis describing variation in SPGs, we next explicitly tested whether current or prior‐year drought treatment was associated with changes in allocation to SPGs. Linear mixed‐effect models controlling for effects of genotype indicated that there was no significant difference in total SPGs between trees experiencing current‐year drought and those with normal watering in 2022 (P = 0.3417; Fig. 2a). Trees that experienced drought the prior year had higher SPG content by 1.46% dry weight, an 11% increase over plants that were normally watered the prior year (P < 0.0001), corresponding with increases in salicortin and tremulacin in the drought–control‐ and drought–drought‐treated trees (Fig. S2). Prior‐year water availability explains 7.7% of variance in total SPGs between samples, compared with 14.5% explained by genotype (Table 1). CT concentrations, as measured by colorimetric acid‐butanol assays, did not differ between treatments in 2022 (Fig. 2c). There was marginal evidence for a treatment effect on CT concentrations in 2022 (χ2 = 7.55, P = 0.056), corresponding with a trend toward higher CTs following a single year of drought (CDD vs CCC, P = 0.063). However, this pattern was not maintained under prolonged or repeated drought treatments.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Drought memory shapes aspen (Populus tremuloides) allocation to foliar defensive chemistry. Percent dry weight (% DW) allocated to salicinoid phenolic glycosides (SPGs) was higher in P. tremuloides that experienced drought in the prior year in both 2022 (a) and 2023 (b). Condensed tannins (CTs) did not differ between treatment groups in 2022 (c) but were significantly lower in previously drought‐stressed trees in 2023 (d). Colored points represent individual samples; black points represent treatment mean; black lines show mean ± SE. Pairwise comparisons were performed using emmeans with Tukey‐adjusted P‐values: (***) < 0.001, (**) <0.01, (*) <0.05. Sample sizes: n ≤ 51 (CCC, DDD) or n ≤ 74 (CDD, DCD). CCC = control‐control‐control; CDD = control‐drought‐drought; DCD = drought‐control‐drought; DDD = drought‐drought‐drought.

Table 1.

Variance explained (VE) in Populus tremuloides chemical defenses for treatment and genotype.

Year VE by genotype (%) CI lower–upper VE by treatment (%) CI lower–upper
Salicin 2022 1.2 0.6–6.4 9.3 6.6–14.1
2023 20.5 18.8–21.0 35.5 29.9–41.0
Salicortin 2022 15.3 12.3–16.7 8.9 3.3–13.0
2023 38.1 32.0–39.6 10.7 6.9–17.1
Tremulacin 2022 17.3 11.1–17.5 6.3 3.2–13.6
2023 56.5 44.8–60.8 5.5 4.6–8.2
Total SPGs 2022 14.5 9.3–19.2 7.7 5.1–11.8
2023 46.3 28.8–48.0 10.9 8.4–15.0
CTs 2022 40.8 29.7–53.8 1.3 0.9–3.9
2023 50.8 34.5–63.7 3.1 1.3–3.6

CI, 95% confidence interval; CTs, condensed tannins; SPGs, salicinoid phenolic glycosides; VE, variance explained.

Prior‐year effects still dominate after prolonged drought

In 2023, total SPGs again differed primarily by prior‐year treatment, with an 8% increase in plants that had experienced drought the previous year compared with prior‐year controls (P < 0.0001; Fig. 2b). DCD plots were also significantly higher than controls (5%, P = 0.0173) despite sharing the same prior‐year treatment, a difference associated with significant increases in both salicin (26%, P < 0.0001) and tremulacin (4%, P = 0.0254; Fig. S2). It cannot be determined from the data whether this is due to the drought in 2021 or 2023 as these are correlated in the treatments. No significant differences were observed between the 2‐ and 3‐yr drought groups. Both genotype and treatment explained more variance in 2023 (46.3 and 10.9%, respectively), with treatment effects strongest for salicin and salicortin (Table 1). CTs in 2023 were significantly higher in the alternating drought treatment than in the 2‐ (31%, P = 0.0006) and 3‐yr (32%, P = 0.0011) consecutive drought plots (Fig. 2d). As in 2022, genotype explained more variation than treatment for all chemical defenses except salicin.

Evidence for a shift in allocation between SPGs and CTs following drought

Comparisons among treatments revealed contrasting allocation patterns between SPGs and CTs in plots that switched treatments between 2021 and 2022. Between 2022 and 2023, all groups showed modest SPG increases, but the increase in CDD was 2.93‐fold greater than in DCD (P < 0.0001; Figs 3a, S3). By contrast, CT concentrations increased in DCD but decreased in CDD by a mean of 6.095% dry weight, with the year‐to‐year change differing by a mean of 6.77% dry weight between the groups (P = 0.0014; Figs 3b, S3, S4).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Drought memory in Populus tremuloides is associated with opposing shifts in salicinoid phenolic glycosides (SPGs) and CTs. Mean total percent dry weight (% DW) by treatment group for SPGs (a) and CTs (b) in 2022 and 2023; points show mean ± SE. Asterisks to the right of panels (a, b) indicate significant differences among treatment groups based on post hoc comparisons of within‐sample changes from 2022 to 2023 (estimated marginal means with Tukey‐adjusted P‐values; *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001). (c) The change in SPGs from 2022 to 2023 is inversely correlated with the change in CTs in the CDD and DCD treatment groups (slope = −0.07181, adjusted R² = 0.03996, P < 0.01). Shaded ribbon indicates 95% confidence interval. Sample sizes: n ≥ 51 (CCC, DDD) and n ≥ 74 (CDD, DCD). CCC = control‐control‐control; CDD = control‐drought‐drought; DCD = drought‐control‐drought; DDD = drought‐drought‐drought.

Across individuals, total SPG content and CT content were negatively correlated (slope = −1.16, adjusted R 2 = 0.1084, P < 0.0001). To determine whether individual trees were shifting their allocations between these two compound classes, we tested for correlation between year‐to‐year changes in SPGs and CTs within the groups that switched treatments between 2021 and 2022 (CDD and DCD). Changes were negatively correlated (slope = −0.07181, adjusted R 2 = 0.03996, P = 0.0074; Fig. 3c), consistent with an allocation trade‐off between SPGs and CTs due to drought induction.

Associations between SPGs and growth and canopy condition

Having observed drought‐associated shifts in foliar chemistry, we next asked whether these changes were associated with differences in aspen performance, testing whether variation in foliar chemistry corresponded to differences in growth and leaf canopy condition. Growth differed significantly among drought treatments (Fig. 4a–c; Table 2). Changes in SPG allocation were positively associated with RGR, indicating that increased investment in SPGs was not accompanied by reduced growth (Fig. 4a). Exclusion of the extreme observation reduced statistical support for this relationship, although the direction and magnitude of the estimated effect were largely unchanged. There was no statistically significant association between CTs or total phenolics and RGR (Fig. 4b,c).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Drought‐associated changes in foliar chemistry track context‐dependent variation in aspen (Populus tremuloides) performance. (a–c) Relative growth rate (RGR, 2023) as a function of (a) salicinoid phenolic glycosides (SPGs), (b) condensed tannins (CTs), and (c) total phenolic chemistry. (d–f) Proportion of canopy damaged (2023) as a function of (d) SPGs, (e) CTs, and (f) total phenolic chemistry. Points represent individual trees. Lines show treatment‐specific model predictions from beta regression models, back‐transformed to the response scale and expressed as the predicted proportion of canopy damaged; shaded ribbons indicate 95% confidence intervals. Statistics and significance reported in Table 2. SPGs were positively associated with growth, although support for this relationship was sensitive to a single extreme observation and varied with prior‐year drought conditions (a). There was no statistically significant association between CTs or total phenolics and growth (b, c). SPGs were associated with reduced canopy damage (d), whereas relationships between canopy damage and both CTs and total phenolics depended on drought history, with directionally opposing patterns among treatments and weak or nonsignificant effects in some cases (e, f). CCC = control‐control‐control; CDD = control‐drought‐drought; DCD = drought‐control‐drought; DDD = drought‐drought‐drought.

Table 2.

Associations between foliar chemistry and drought treatment with Populus tremuloides growth and canopy damage.

Relative growth rate (RGR)
ΔSPGs × treatment
Type III ANOVA df F value P‐value
w/outlier w/out outlier w/outlier w/out outlier
~ΔSPGs 1 9.89 0.676 0.002 0.413
~treatment 3 4.79 4.72 0.003 0.004
~ΔSPGs × treatment 3 2.41 1.16 0.071 0.327
Wald tests of model coefficients Estimate SE P‐value
ΔSPGs 0.033 0.01 0.001
ΔSPGs × CDD −0.043 0.021 0.044
ΔCTs × treatment
Type III ANOVA df F value P‐value
~treatment 3 7.11 < 0.001
ΔTotal phenolics × treatment
Type III ANOVA df F value P‐value
~treatment 3 7.035 < 0.001
ΔSPGs × prior‐year drought treatment
Type III ANOVA df F value P‐value
w/outlier w/out outlier w/outlier w/out outlier
~prior‐year drought 1 8.236 7.24 0.005 0.008
~ΔSPGs × prior‐year drought 1 4.462 1.77 0.037 0.187
Wald tests of model coefficients Estimate SE P‐value
Prior‐year drought −0.072 0.027 0.009
Estimated marginal trends Estimate SE df P‐value
Control–drought 0.0297 0.014 106 0.037
Canopy damage
Model selection and interaction tests Comparison ΔAIC χ 2 df P‐value
SPGs Additive vs treatment‐only −8.95 10.94 1 < 0.001
CTs Interaction vs additive −2.66 8.66 3 0.034
Total phenolics Interaction vs additive −4.29 10.28 3 0.016
Estimated effects on canopy damage Treatment Effect (β or marginal effect ± SE) 95% CI P‐value
SPGs All (additive) −1.8% per 1% DW [−2.9, −0.8] < 0.001
CTs CCC 0.027 ± 0.010 — 0.0099
CDD −0.031 ± 0.018 — 0.089
Total phenolics CCC 0.022 ± 0.011 — 0.055
CDD −0.048 ± 0.020 — 0.019

AIC, Akaike information criterion; CI, confidence interval; CTs, condensed tannins; df, degrees of freedom; SPGs, salicinoid phenolic glycosides.

There was some evidence that the relationship between SPG allocation and growth differed by drought history, although support for this pattern depended on the inclusion of the extreme observation (Fig. S5). In trees that experienced favorable water conditions in the previous year, increases in SPG allocation were positively associated with RGR, whereas this relationship was neutral to weakly negative following prior‐year drought. Simple slope analyses supported this pattern, indicating a positive association in trees without prior‐year drought exposure, but no detectable relationship in trees that experienced prior‐year drought.

We next tested whether foliar chemistry was associated with canopy damage. In 2023, the proportion of canopy damaged ranged from 0 to 1 (median = 0.15) and was elevated across all drought‐exposed treatments (CDD, DCD, and DDD) relative to CCC, with the strongest increase observed in DCD (Fickle et al., 2026). Total SPG concentration was associated with reduced canopy damage, with a 1 percent dry weight increase in SPGs corresponding to a 1.8% decrease in expected damage (Fig. 4d). By contrast, associations between canopy damage and both CTs and total phenolics depended on drought history (Fig. 4e,f). In continuously watered trees (CCC), higher concentrations were associated with increased canopy damage, whereas in trees that experienced drought in the previous year (CDD), higher concentrations were associated with reduced canopy damage. Relationships were weak or nonsignificant in the remaining treatments, indicating that the effects of phenolic investment on canopy damage varied with drought history.

Potential pathogens show association with prior‐year treatment

To characterize baseline fungal community composition and assess whether the common garden reflects field‐associated communities, we surveyed foliar fungal communities at peak drought. Our survey of foliar fungal communities at peak drought identified 6467 unique ASVs in 2022 and 8290 ASVs in 2023 after filtering for family‐level assignments, with Cladosporium and Comoclathris the most abundant taxa across treatments – consistent with previous Populus phyllosphere surveys (Figs S6, S7). We compared community composition in the common garden in 2022 with that of the field sites and found that the garden composition broadly corresponded to composition in the field, with no significant differences in incidence of Cladosporium, Didymella, Dothidotthia, or Fusarium (BH‐adjusted P > 0.01). Garden samples had higher Comoclathris abundance (BH‐adjusted P < 0.0001) and lower overall diversity than field samples (Shannon diversity difference = −0.456, P < 0.0001), suggesting that the common garden is a reasonable but slightly less diverse representation of microbial communities associated with these genotypes.

Having established that the common garden broadly reflects field‐associated communities, we next asked whether drought and host chemistry were associated with shifts in the fungal community. Distance‐based redundancy analysis (dbRDA) showed significant differences in fungal community composition between treatment groups (Fig. S8). The full model including treatment group, total SPGs and CTs explained a modest but significant proportion of variation in community composition (R 2 = 0.039, P = 0.001). The first two constrained axes explained 44.4% and 26.6% of constrained variation, respectively, and were both significant (CAP1: P = 0.001, CAP2: P = 0.035), indicating that community responses to drought and host chemistry were structured along more than one axis of constrained variation. Drought‐treated groups largely overlapped with one another but were shifted relative to controls along the primary axis (P = 0.001). In addition, SPGs were significantly associated with community structure (P = 0.007), whereas CTs showed no detectable effect (P = 0.636).

To determine whether these community‐wide shifts reflected changes in ecologically relevant community characteristics, we next used FungalTraits to classify fungal ASVs as pathogen or nonpathogen and tested whether the relative abundance of pathogen‐capable taxa was associated with drought and SPGs. Given the strong overlap among drought treatment groups in the dbRDA, we simplified treatment to a current‐year drought vs control contrast and compared candidate models, including drought, SPGs, and their interaction. The best‐supported model included additive effects of drought and SPGs, with no evidence for an interaction (ΔAIC ≈ 0.1; LRT P = 0.145). Pathogen‐capable fungi were more abundant under current‐year drought (β ≈ 0.24 ± 0.09 SE, P = 0.008) and decreased with increasing SPG concentrations (β ≈ −0.08 ± 0.04 SE, P = 0.027; Fig. 5a).

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Responses of pathogen‐capable fungi to drought and foliar chemistry vary across taxa (a) Relative abundance (RA) of pathogen‐capable fungi identified by IT sequencing from Populus tremuloides leaves as a function of total salicinoid phenolic glycoside (SPG) concentration (2023), shown for control and drought treatments. Lines indicate model fits with 95% confidence intervals. (b) Genus‐level changes in relative abundance under drought, expressed as log‐odds differences (ΔRA). Positive values indicate higher relative abundance in drought relative to control, and negative values indicate decreases. Points are colored by direction of change (higher in drought vs control), with horizontal bars indicating 95% confidence intervals. (c, d) Genus‐level associations between relative abundance and (c) SPGs and (d) CTs, expressed as log‐odds ΔRA per 1% dry weight change in chemistry. Positive values indicate increasing relative abundance with higher chemical concentrations. Points are colored to match panel b (indicating whether each genus is more abundant in drought or control), with horizontal bars indicating 95% confidence intervals. (e) Log₂ fold change in relative abundance of individual genera in DDD (drought‐drought‐drought) relative to CCC (control‐control‐control). Points represent unique amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) within genera. Solid points are significant (Benjamini–Hochberg adjusted P < 0.05). Point size reflects maximum observed RA. (f) Distribution of RA (log₁₀‐transformed) for a representative ASV (Epicoccum italicum), shown across treatments; each point represents a single sample, with bars indicating mean ± SE. Across panels, drought was associated with increased relative abundance of several pathogen‐capable genera (b). Associations between SPGs and relative abundance were variable across taxa, with only a subset showing consistent directional responses (a, c). By contrast, relationships with CTs were generally weak and inconsistent (d), indicating taxon‐specific responses that depend on both compound class and drought context.

To determine which taxa contributed to the drought‐associated increase in pathogen‐capable fungi, we next modeled genus‐level responses to current‐year drought within the subset of taxa classified as pathogens. Responses were heterogeneous across genera, with multiple taxa showing significant increases or decreases in relative abundance under drought (Fig. 5b). Several genera exhibited positive responses to drought, including Myriangiales (β = 1.04, P < 0.001), Dothidotthia (β = 1.18, P < 0.001), and Epicoccum (β = 0.82, P = 0.002), while others such as Erysiphe (β = −0.71, P = 0.006) and Didymella (β = −1.29, P = 0.014) declined. These opposing responses indicate that the overall increase in pathogen‐capable fungi arises from shifts in a subset of responsive taxa rather than a uniform community‐wide response.

Despite this heterogeneity, changes in community composition were disproportionately driven by a small number of taxa. Cladosporium accounted for the largest proportional increase in pathogen‐capable fungi under drought, substantially exceeding other genera (Fig. S9), and showed a positive model‐estimated drought response (β = 0.22, P = 0.015). However, contributions were distributed across multiple taxa, indicating that drought‐driven shifts in pathogen abundance reflect both dominant and diffuse components of community change. Model‐estimated drought effects were generally consistent with observed proportional changes across genera, supporting the robustness of these patterns across analytical approaches.

Across genera, drought‐associated responses in the common garden were positively correlated with site‐level associations across field sites (Table S2). Genera that increased under experimental drought also tended to be more abundant at the driest site (UNCO) relative to the wettest site (UNT; variance‐weighted linear model: slope = 1.52 ± 0.48, P = 0.011, R 2 = 0.53).

Having identified the taxa driving drought‐associated shifts in pathogen abundance, we next asked whether these responses were associated with host chemical defenses. Specifically, we tested whether the relative abundance of drought‐responsive genera was related to concentrations of SPGs and CTs. Associations with SPGs varied across genera and were not uniformly suppressive (Fig. 5c). Notably, Cladosporium, the dominant contributor to the drought‐associated increase in pathogen‐capable fungi, showed a significant negative association with SPGs (β = −0.10, P = 0.023), consistent with the overall decline in pathogen abundance at higher SPG concentrations observed at the community level (Fig. 5a). By contrast, other drought‐responsive taxa showed neutral or positive associations with SPGs. For example, Myriangiales, which also increased under drought, exhibited a positive association with SPGs (β = 0.20, P = 0.037).

Associations with CTs were weaker and less consistent across taxa (Fig. 5d). Only a small number of genera showed significant relationships with CT concentrations, including Thyrostroma, which exhibited a positive association (β = 0.22, P = 0.029). However, these effects were not directionally consistent across taxa and did not correspond to a clear shift in pathogen abundance at the community level. Together, these results suggest that CTs play a more limited role than SPGs in structuring pathogen‐capable fungal communities.

While it was the largest contributor to the drought‐associated increase in pathogen‐capable fungi, Cladosporium is not a strictly pathogenic genus. Cladosporium includes taxa with endophytic, saprotrophic, and opportunistic lifestyles. Because associations between Cladosporium abundance and canopy damage could provide insight into its ecological role – for example, enrichment on damaged tissue might be consistent with saprotrophic growth or opportunistic pathogenicity, whereas enrichment on relatively healthy canopies could suggest alternative ecological roles – we tested whether Cladosporium abundance covaried with the proportion of canopy damaged. After accounting for treatment effects, Cladosporium relative abundance was not significantly associated with the proportion of canopy damaged (β = −0.043, P = 0.16).

While genus‐level analyses identified taxa associated with drought and host chemistry, these patterns assume that all ASVs within a genus respond similarly. To evaluate this assumption at finer taxonomic resolution, we examined ASV‐level differential abundance within pathogen‐capable genera using the strongest treatment contrast, comparing fully watered controls (CCC) with repeated drought (DDD).

ASV‐level responses in the CCC vs DDD comparison were often, but not universally, consistent within genera (Fig. 5e). In several cases (e.g. Myriangiales, and Epicoccum), most ASVs within a genus shifted in the same direction, supporting the genus‐level drought associations described above. However, other genera (e.g. Alternaria, and Cladosporium) contained ASVs with both positive and negative responses, indicating substantial within‐genus heterogeneity under the strongest drought contrast. Comparison of DESeq2 log2 fold changes with beta‐binomial mixed‐model estimates revealed strong concordance between methods. Effect directions agreed for 94% of ASVs, and effect sizes were positively correlated (Spearman's ρ = 0.70), indicating consistent patterns of taxon response to drought. Although fewer ASVs reached statistical significance in the mixed‐model framework, likely due to its more conservative structure, the high agreement between approaches supports the robustness of differential abundance results.

Discussion

Specialized metabolites are key determinants of tree tolerance to biotic and abiotic stresses. Here, we show that foliar chemistry in aspen retains a memory of prior environmental conditions. SPG allocation, which is typically stable within a growing season and largely structured by genotype (Lindroth et al., 2002; Donaldson et al., 2006), increased following prior‐year drought but showed little response to current‐year drought. This pattern suggests that drought effects on SPGs are established before or during early leaf development and persist across growing seasons, such that a single drought event can leave a lasting chemical signature.

As has been previously found in aspen, genotype explained a substantial proportion of variation in phenolic chemistry across treatments. Although we did not explicitly model genotype‐by‐treatment interactions, prior work in this system indicates intraspecific variation in drought‐response traits across populations (Kerr et al., 2023). We also observed considerable heterogeneity in year‐to‐year changes in chemical allocation among individuals, particularly under alternating treatment regimes (Fig. S3), suggesting that genotypes may differ in both the magnitude and direction of chemical responses to drought history. Together, these patterns are consistent with genotype‐by‐environment interactions, even though they were not formally tested here, and suggest that host heterogeneity in chemical defenses may influence postdrought recovery and biotic interactions.

Drought has been associated with elevated feeding preference in some insect guilds (Anderegg et al., 2015; Gely et al., 2020; Eisenring et al., 2024). It is possible that drought‐mediated increases in herbivory contribute to the observed increases in SPG production. While herbivory was observed in the garden, it was not explicitly measured. However, the spatial intermixing and replication of our treatment plots reduce the likelihood that herbivory alone accounts for the observed pattern. Whether acting directly or indirectly, the environmental drivers of increased SPGs appear to be linked to drought.

CTs are typically more inducible than SPGs (Hemming & Lindroth, 1999; Lindroth et al., 2002; Donaldson & Lindroth, 2007). Consistent with this, we observed weak evidence for transient increases following a single year of drought, but CTs declined under multi‐year drought. This decline was unexpected given proposed roles in photoprotection and oxidative stress mitigation (Gourlay & Constabel, 2019; Gourlay et al., 2022), and suggests that CT induction may not be sustained under prolonged or repeated stress.

The divergent responses of these compound classes to prolonged drought raise the question of whether drought‐associated shifts in chemical allocation translate into differences in plant performance. We tested this by evaluating leaf damage as an indicator of canopy health. SPG concentrations were consistently associated with reduced leaf damage, whereas relationships with CTs and total phenolics depended on drought history, with higher concentrations associated with reduced damage under prior drought but increased damage under well‐watered conditions.

These results suggest that CT investment may be beneficial under drought conditions but that these benefits are context‐dependent, consistent with a scenario in which inducible defenses would be advantageous. One possibility is that allocation within the phenylpropanoid pathway is temporally structured: SPGs are largely determined early in leaf development and respond to prior environmental conditions, whereas CTs remain more inducible within a growing season. Under this framework, delayed increases in SPGs following drought may constrain subsequent CT induction.

Trade‐offs with chemical allocation are a central theme in chemical ecology. The trade‐off between SPGs and CTs has been consistently demonstrated in both surveys of variation within genotypes and through experimental manipulation of expression in the phenylpropanoid pathway (Donaldson et al., 2006; Boeckler et al., 2014; Cole et al., 2016; Rubert‐Nason & Lindroth, 2021; Lindroth et al., 2023). However, evidence for a trade‐off due to environmental induction is mixed. Here, we specifically tested whether drought‐induces shifts in allocation consistent with an SPG‐CT trade‐off. Here, drought was associated with increased SPGs and reduced CTs, consistent with an induced shift in allocation. However, we found no evidence for a trade‐off between phenolic investment and growth. Associations between SPGs and RGR were neutral to positive and varied with drought history, suggesting that allocation‐growth relationships are context‐dependent rather than constrained by a fixed trade‐off.

The observed increase in SPGs and decrease in CTs during drought parallels geographic variation in aspen, where western populations tend to exhibit higher SPGs and lower CTs compared with northern and Great Lakes populations (Lindroth et al., 2023). While these geographic differences likely reflect long‐term evolutionary and demographic processes rather than short‐term plastic responses, the similarity in direction suggests that drought may reinforce or contribute to these broader patterns. Cytotype variation may also contribute, as triploid genotypes—common in western populations—differ in phenolic allocation, particularly during stress (Eisenring et al., 2022). Diploid genotypes appear to exhibit stronger phenolic trade‐offs in these systems, suggesting that cytotype may shape allocation strategies under drought (DeRose et al., 2022). Because most genotypes in our common garden were triploid, an important next step will be to evaluate whether similar patterns hold across populations with greater cytotypic diversity. More broadly, integrating postdrought longitudinal measurements of chemical investment with performance across genotypes and environments will be critical for determining how alternative allocation strategies contribute to resilience.

A key implication of these shifts in foliar chemistry is their potential to influence biotic interactions. In line with this expectation, our results point to structured, taxon‐specific responses of foliar fungi to drought and host chemistry. Only a subset of taxa responded to drought, and associations with foliar chemistry were similarly variable, suggesting that drought legacies may extend to microbial communities, but not uniformly across taxa. Differences among closely related taxa, including within genera, further indicate that traits influencing host association may operate at finer taxonomic scales. While the effect sizes observed here were generally modest, the consistency of these patterns across taxa suggests that drought and host chemistry may act as selective filters on microbial communities, although the functional consequences of these shifts remain uncertain.

Importantly, many of the taxa identified as ‘pathogen‐capable’ encompass a range of ecological strategies, including saprotrophic and potentially beneficial interactions, and their roles may shift depending on host condition and environment. For example, Epicoccum, which we observed at higher abundance in drought (Fig. 5f), has been reported as both an emerging pathogen in some systems (e.g. leaf spot and seed rot diseases) and as a beneficial or biocontrol‐associated taxon in others, including potential roles in inducing host defenses, including drought‐induced shifts in phenolic chemistry (Del Frari et al., 2019; Falk De Avila et al., 2025; Rashad et al., 2025; George et al., 2026). Such functional flexibility complicates interpretation of taxonomic shifts and highlights the need to link community composition with functional outcomes.

Similarly, although Cladosporium was the largest contributor to the drought‐associated increase in pathogen‐capable fungi, its ecological role in this context remains uncertain. Cladosporium is not generally recognized as a major foliar pathogen of aspen, though it has been shown to cause disease in other plant hosts (Tyagi et al., 2023). Members of the genus are more commonly associated with endophytic and saprotrophic lifestyles, and several species have been reported as mycoparasites of Melampsora spp. that may contribute to suppression of rust disease in aspen (El‐Dawy et al., 2021). Cladosporium abundance was not significantly associated with the proportion of canopy damaged after accounting for treatment effects, suggesting that increases in Cladosporium should not be interpreted as direct evidence of elevated pathogen pressure or as a simple response to declining leaf condition.

The patterns we observed are further supported by overlap between taxa enriched under drought in the common garden and those more abundant in the driest field populations, suggesting that similar ecological filters may operate across experimental and natural settings, although differences in tree age and environmental history between the garden and field limit direct comparison (Table S2). For example, Golovinomyces, a genus associated with powdery mildew, was less abundant under drought and at the driest field site and tended to be associated with lower SPG concentrations, consistent with expectations for a pathogen that favors well‐watered hosts (Bradshaw et al., 2017; Qiu et al., 2018; Wiseman et al., 2021). By contrast, Ganoderma was more abundant under drought in the garden and present at high abundance in some samples at our driest field site. Ganoderma is considered a secondary pathogen of aspen, but has been observed to be more damaging to aspen suffering from drought (Worrall & Fairweather, 2009; Dudley et al., 2015; Kües et al., 2015). Similarly, members of the Myriangiales, many of which are identified as pathogens of leaves and meristems, were enriched under drought and at drier field sites and were associated with both higher SPGs and CTs suggesting they may be more tolerant of chemically defended hosts (Tsuneda et al., 2008; Fan et al., 2017; Barreto et al., 2024).

While these examples are illustrative and not intended to establish causal relationships, they highlight the potential for drought and host chemistry to act as selective filters on microbial communities in ways that depend on both taxonomic identity and ecological strategy. Understanding these interactions will require linking chemical traits, microbial functional traits, and host conditions across environmental gradients.

In deciduous trees like aspen, the physiological and molecular mechanisms behind drought stress memory remain poorly understood. In woody tissues, drought‐induced damage to fine roots and xylem can limit water and nutrient uptake long after the period of drought, reducing resource availability and potentially constraining how leaves allocate resources to metabolism. Alternatively, persistent changes in carbohydrate reserves due to reduced photosynthesis during drought or alterations to the regulation of specialized metabolite pathways could produce altered chemical profiles following drought stress. In other plant systems, drought‐induced epigenetic modifications, small RNAs, and transcriptional reprogramming have been associated with changes to stress tolerance following drought events, though few of these studies have been conducted in perennial plants or over multiple growing seasons (Auler et al., 2021; Sharma et al., 2022; Siddique et al., 2024). The paucity of documented examples in deciduous trees highlights a key gap in our understanding. Our results show a foliar chemical legacy of drought exposure, but further research is needed to ascertain whether the observed pattern is driven by active regulation or an indirect effect of structural damage to other plant tissues. It further remains to be determined how these changes interact with subsequent biotic and abiotic challenges and whether they are beneficial to postdrought recovery or likely to exacerbate the detrimental effects of drought.

In either case, these legacy effects may have far‐reaching ecological consequences. In aspen, severe multi‐year drought has been identified as the major driver of ‘Sudden Aspen Decline’ (SAD; Worrall et al., 2010, 2015). Canopy dieback and mortality are often followed by increased prevalence of opportunistic pathogens such as Cytospora chrysosperma, Ganoderma applanatum, and insect pests (Marchetti et al., 2011; Dudley et al., 2015). Our results suggest that drought‐induced shifts in chemical defenses may contribute to postdrought vulnerability in aspen by influencing stress tolerance and biotic interactions beyond the immediate period of drought. More broadly, climate change is predicted to intensify and prolong periods of drought in many regions (Dai, 2013; Cook et al., 2015). Similar dynamics have been observed in other systems; for example, drought constrains induction of terpenes and increases susceptibility of Pinus edulis to bark beetle attack (Gaylord et al., 2013). This raises the possibility of more frequent large‐scale stress‐associated pathogen or pest outbreaks in forest trees. Understanding how drought legacies in plant chemistry mediate biotic interactions will be critical for predicting forest recovery and informing management strategies in a rapidly changing climate.

Competing interests

None declared.

Author contributions

AMH, JCF, KLK, WRLA and TLK contributed to the project planning and experimental design. JCF and KLK conducted the physiological measurements. AMH, AMP, ES, MA and CF carried out the fieldwork and sample processing. AMH and HNC conducted UPLC experiments. AMH, DLF and RLL performed the metabolomics processing and analysis. AMH and TLK conducted the data analysis. AMH, RLL, WRLA and TLK contributed to writing the manuscript. WRLA and TLK contributed equally to this work.

Disclaimer

The New Phytologist Foundation remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in maps and in any institutional affiliations.

Supporting information

Fig. S1 Multivariate patterns of Populus tremuloides foliar chemistry across drought treatments.

Fig. S2 Drought legacy effects on Populus tremuloides allocation to individual salicinoid phenolic glycosides.

Fig. S3 Changes in allocation to Populus tremuloides defensive chemistry differ among drought treatments.

Fig. S4 Drought legacy effects on individual salicinoid phenolic glycosides in Populus tremuloides.

Fig. S5 Relationship between Populus tremuloides salicinoid phenolic glycoside allocation and relative growth rate depends on prior‐year drought treatment.

Fig. S6 Relative abundance of dominant fungal genera across field sites in 2023.

Fig. S7 Genus‐level composition of foliar fungal communities across drought treatments in the common garden.

Fig. S8 Constrained ordination of foliar fungal communities from Populus tremuloides in the common garden.

Fig. S9 Concordance between model‐estimated drought effects and observed changes in relative abundance of fungal genera in common garden aspen (Populus tremuloides).

Methods S1 Common garden design and drought treatment.

Table S1 ITS PCR Oligos (from Lundberg et al., 2013; Regalado et al., 2020).

Table S2 Beta‐binomial GLMM results for taxa most associated with drought‐stressed P. tremuloides in the common garden with corresponding results from the comparison between the driest (Uncompahgre National Forest) and wettest (Uinta National Forest) sampled field sites.

Please note: Wiley is not responsible for the content or functionality of any Supporting Information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing material) should be directed to the New Phytologist Central Office.

NPH-252-1413-s001.pdf (1.3MB, pdf)

Acknowledgements

We thank Aaron Puri and Xinhui Yu for advice on UPLC analysis, Matthew Mulvey and Richard Clark for feedback on experimental design and analyses. We are grateful to members of the Karasov and Anderegg Labs for help with leaf collection. During preparation of this manuscript, the authors used ChatGPT (OpenAI; accessed 2026) to assist with language editing, organization, and clarity of presentation. All AI‐assisted text was reviewed and revised by the authors, who take full responsibility for the content of the manuscript. Work in the TLK Lab was supported by the US National Institutes of Health (NIH; R35GM150722‐01), the US National Science Foundation (NSF; 2422727), the US Department of Agriculture National Institute of Food and Agriculture (USDA‐NIFA; 10074268), and an Incentive Seed Grant from the Wilkes Center for Climate Science and Policy. AH was additionally supported by a Phyllis Coley and Thomas A. Kursar Field Research Award and NIH/NIGMS training grant T32 GM141848. Work in the WRLA Lab was supported by the David and Lucille Packard Foundation, US National Science Foundation (NSF; 2003017, 2044937, 2330582, and 2519523) as well as the Alan T. Waterman award (IOS‐2325700).

Contributor Information

William R. L. Anderegg, Email: anderegg@utah.edu.

Talia L. Karasov, Email: t.karasov@utah.edu.

Data availability

Sequencing data are available on the SRA database, accession PRJNA1372733. Sample metadata and chemistry data are available through Dryad: doi: 10.5061/dryad.bzkh189qb. Scripts are available at https://github.com/AubreyHawks/aspen_chem_microbiome.

References

  1. Abarenkov K, Nilsson RH, Larsson KH, Taylor AFS, May TW, Frøslev TG, Pawlowska J, Lindahl B, Põldmaa K, Truong C et al. 2024. The UNITE database for molecular identification and taxonomic communication of fungi and other eukaryotes: sequences, taxa and classifications reconsidered. Nucleic Acids Research 52: D791–D797. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Anderegg WRL, Hicke JA, Fisher RA, Allen CD, Aukema J, Bentz B, Hood S, Lichstein JW, Macalady AK, McDowell N et al. 2015. Tree mortality from drought, insects, and their interactions in a changing climate. New Phytologist 208: 674–683. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Arel‐Bundock V, Greifer N, Heiss A. 2024. How to interpret statistical models using marginaleffects for R and Python . Journal of Statistical Software 111: 1–32. [Google Scholar]
  4. Auler PA, Souza GM, da Silva Engela MRG, do Amaral MN, Rossatto T, da Silva MGZ, Furlan CM, Maserti B, Braga EJB. 2021. Stress memory of physiological, biochemical and metabolomic responses in two different rice genotypes under drought stress: the scale matters. Plant Science 311: 110994. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Barreto GG, Souza‐Motta CM, Silva GA, Groenewald JZ, Crous PW, Bezerra JDP. 2024. Meristematic and meristematic‐like fungi in Dothideomycetes. Fungal Systematics and Evolution 14: 77–88. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B, Walker S. 2015. Fitting linear mixed‐effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67: 1–48. [Google Scholar]
  7. Boeckler GA, Towns M, Unsicker SB, Mellway RD, Yip L, Hilke I, Gershenzon J, Constabel CP. 2014. Transgenic upregulation of the condensed tannin pathway in poplar leads to a dramatic shift in leaf palatability for two tree‐feeding Lepidoptera. Journal of Chemical Ecology 40: 150–158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bose T, Mahomed TG, Mbatha KC, Joubert JC, Hammerbacher A. 2025. Tissue ontogeny and chemical composition influence bacterial biodiversity in the wood and shoot tip of Populus nigra . Plant Biology (Stuttgart, Germany) 27: 913–923. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bradshaw M, Braun U, Götz M, Meeboon J, Takamatsu S. 2017. Powdery mildew of Chrysanthemum × morifolium: phylogeny and taxonomy in the context of Golovinomyces species on Asteraceae hosts. Mycologia 109: 508–519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Brodribb TJ, Powers J, Cochard H, Choat B. 2020. Hanging by a thread? Forests and drought. Science 368: 261–266. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Burns AE, Gleadow RM, Woodrow IE. 2002. Light alters the allocation of nitrogen to cyanogenic glycosides in Eucalyptus cladocalyx . Oecologia 133: 288–294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Callahan BJ, McMurdie PJ, Rosen MJ, Han AW, Johnson AJA, Holmes SP. 2016. Dada2: high‐resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nature Methods 13: 581–583. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Cambon MC, Cartry D, Chancerel E, Ziegler C, Levionnois S, Coste S, Stahl C, Delzon S, Buée M, Burban B et al. 2022. Drought tolerance traits in Neotropical trees correlate with the composition of phyllosphere fungal communities. Phytobiomes Journal 7: 244–258. [Google Scholar]
  14. Chang S, Puryear J, Cairney J. 1993. A simple and efficient method for isolating RNA from pine trees. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter 11: 113–116. [Google Scholar]
  15. Chen Q‐L, Hu H‐W, Yan Z‐Z, Li C‐Y, Nguyen B‐AT, Zhu Y‐G, He J‐Z. 2021. Precipitation increases the abundance of fungal plant pathogens in Eucalyptus phyllosphere . Environmental Microbiology 23: 7688–7700. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Cole CT, Stevens MT, Anderson JE, Lindroth RL. 2016. Heterozygosity, gender, and the growth‐defense trade‐off in quaking aspen. Oecologia 181: 381–390. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Cook BI, Ault TR, Smerdon JE. 2015. Unprecedented 21st century drought risk in the American Southwest and Central Plains. Science Advances 1: e1400082. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Cope OL, Lindroth RL, Helm A, Keefover‐Ring K, Kruger EL. 2021. Trait plasticity and trade‐offs shape intra‐specific variation in competitive response in a foundation tree species. New Phytologist 230: 710–719. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Dai A. 2013. Increasing drought under global warming in observations and models. Nature Climate Change 3: 52–58. [Google Scholar]
  20. Del Frari G, Cabral A, Nascimento T, Boavida Ferreira R, Oliveira H. 2019. Epicoccum layuense a potential biological control agent of esca‐associated fungi in grapevine. PLoS ONE 14: e0213273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. DeRose RJ, Gardner RS, Lindroth RL, Mock KE. 2022. Polyploidy and growth‐defense tradeoffs in natural populations of western quaking Aspen. Journal of Chemical Ecology 48: 431–440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Donaldson JR, Lindroth RL. 2007. Genetics, environment, and their interaction determine efficacy of chemical defense in trembling aspen. Ecology 88: 729–739. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Donaldson JR, Stevens MT, Barnhill HR, Lindroth RL. 2006. Age‐related shifts in leaf chemistry of clonal aspen (Populus tremuloides). Journal of Chemical Ecology 32: 1415–1429. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Dudley MM, Burns KS, Jacobi WR. 2015. Aspen mortality in the Colorado and southern Wyoming Rocky Mountains: extent, severity, and causal factors. Forest Ecology and Management 353: 240–259. [Google Scholar]
  25. Eisenring M, Gessler A, Frei ER, Glauser G, Kammerer B, Moor M, Perret‐Gentil A, Wohlgemuth T, Gossner MM. 2024. Legacy effects of premature defoliation in response to an extreme drought event modulate phytochemical profiles with subtle consequences for leaf herbivory in European beech. New Phytologist 242: 2495–2509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Eisenring M, Lindroth RL, Flansburg A, Giezendanner N, Mock K, Kruger EL. 2022. Genotypic variation rather than ploidy level determines functional trait expression in a foundation tree species in the presence and absence of environmental stress. Annals of Botany 131: 229–242. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. El‐Dawy EG, Mohamed AE, Gherbawy YA, Hussein MA. 2021. Morphological, molecular characterization, plant pathogenicity and biocontrol of Cladosporium complex groups associated with Faba beans. Scientific Reports 11: 14183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Ewing EE, Weeden NF, Simko I. 2024. Proanthocyanidins: key for resistance to Globisporangium (formerly Pythium) seed rot of pea. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 149: 37–49. [Google Scholar]
  29. Falk De Avila LG, Rey MS, Júnior AW, Villa TC, Chierrito de Oliveira G, Vaz de Oliveira Candido LH, Claudino PH, Gabiatti NC, Ortoncelli AR, Borin RC et al. 2025. First report of Epicoccum italicum causing leaf spots on Eugenia uniflora in Brazil. Plant Disease 109: 2600. [Google Scholar]
  30. Fan XL, Barreto RW, Groenewald JZ, Bezerra JDP, Pereira OL, Cheewangkoon R, Mostert L, Tian CM, Crous PW. 2017. Phylogeny and taxonomy of the scab and spot anthracnose fungus Elsinoë (Myriangiales, Dothideomycetes). Studies in Mycology 87: 1–1–41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Fickle JC, Vargas GG, Anderegg WRL. 2025. Ring‐specific vulnerability to embolism reveals accumulation of damage in the xylem. New Phytologist 246: 2046–2058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Fickle JC, Kerr KL, Congram LI, Zahnd C, Anderegg WRL. 2026. Lack of hydraulic acclimation in response to multiple droughts and recovery. Plant, Cell & Environment 49: 6931–6943. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Forrister DL, Endara M‐J, Younkin GC, Coley PD, Kursar TA. 2019. Herbivores as drivers of negative density dependence in tropical forest saplings. Science 363: 1213–1216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Fox J, Weisberg S. 2019. An R companion to applied regression, third edition. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: Sage. [Google Scholar]
  35. Gaylord ML, Kolb TE, Pockman WT, Plaut JA, Yepez EA, Macalady AK, Pangle RE, McDowell NG. 2013. Drought predisposes piñon–juniper woodlands to insect attacks and mortality. New Phytologist 198: 567–578. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Gazol A, Pizarro M, Hammond WM, Allen CD, Camarero JJ. 2025. Droughts preceding tree mortality events have increased in duration and intensity, especially in dry biomes. Nature Communications 16: 5779. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Gely C, Laurance SGW, Stork NE. 2020. How do herbivorous insects respond to drought stress in trees? Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 95: 434–448. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. George M, Colombo DN, Ajayi‐Banji I, Clementson C, Webster R, Mathew FM. 2026. First report of soybean seed disease caused by Epicoccum italicum in North Dakota. Plant Disease 110: 1013. [Google Scholar]
  39. Gerson EA, Kelsey RG. 2004. Piperidine alkaloids in North American Pinus taxa: implications for chemosystematics. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 32: 63–74. [Google Scholar]
  40. Gleadow RM, Foley WJ, Woodrow IE. 1998. Enhanced CO2 alters the relationship between photosynthesis and defence in cyanogenic Eucalyptus cladocalyx F. Muell. Plant, Cell & Environment 21: 12–22. [Google Scholar]
  41. Gourlay G, Constabel CP. 2019. Condensed tannins are inducible antioxidants and protect hybrid poplar against oxidative stress. Tree Physiology 39: 345–355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Gourlay G, Hawkins BJ, Albert A, Schnitzler J‐P, Peter CC. 2022. Condensed tannins as antioxidants that protect poplar against oxidative stress from drought and UV‐B. Plant, Cell & Environment 45: 362–377. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Gruppe A, Fußeder M, Schopf R. 1999. Short rotation plantations of aspen and balsam poplar on former arable land in Germany: defoliating insects and leaf constituents. Forest Ecology and Management 121: 113–122. [Google Scholar]
  44. Gupta S, Raypa P, Chouhan V, Kumar S, Ansari ZG. 2025. Role of tannins in plant defense and pathogen suppression. In: Plant secondary metabolites. London, UK: CRC Press, 177–201. [Google Scholar]
  45. Hakulinen J. 1998. Nitrogen‐induced reduction in leaf phenolic level is not accompanied by increased rust frequency in a compatible willow (Salix myrsinifolia)‐Melampsora rust interaction. Physiologia Plantarum 102: 101–110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Hakulinen J, Julkunen‐Tiitto R. 2008. Variation in leaf phenolics of field‐cultivated willow (Salix myrsinifolia) clones in relation to occurrence of Melampsora rust. Forest Pathology 30: 29–41. [Google Scholar]
  47. Hammond WM, Williams AP, Abatzoglou JT, Adams HD, Klein T, López R, Sáenz‐Romero C, Hartmann H, Breshears DD, Allen CD. 2022. Global field observations of tree die‐off reveal hotter‐drought fingerprint for Earth's forests. Nature Communications 13: 1761. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Hartig F. 2026. DHARMa: residual diagnostics for hierarchical (multi‐level/mixed) regression models .
  49. Hartmann H, Bastos A, das AJ, Esquivel‐Muelbert A, Hammond WM, Martínez‐Vilalta J, McDowell NG, Powers JS, Pugh TAM, Ruthrof KX et al. 2022. Climate change risks to global forest health: Emergence of unexpected events of elevated tree mortality worldwide. Annual Review of Plant Biology 73: 673–702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Hartmann H, Moura CF, Anderegg WRL, Ruehr NK, Salmon Y, Allen CD, Arndt SK, Breshears DD, Davi H, Galbraith D et al. 2018. Research frontiers for improving our understanding of drought‐induced tree and forest mortality. New Phytologist 218: 15–28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Hemming JDC, Lindroth RL. 1995. Intraspecific variation in aspen phytochemistry: effects on performance of gypsy moths and forest tent caterpillars. Oecologia 103: 79–88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Hemming JDC, Lindroth RL. 1999. Effects of light and nutrient availability on aspen. Journal of Chemical Ecology 25: 1687–1714. [Google Scholar]
  53. Holopainen JK, Virjamo V, Ghimire RP, Blande JD, Julkunen‐Tiitto R, Kivimäenpää M. 2018. Climate change effects on secondary compounds of forest trees in the northern hemisphere. Frontiers in Plant Science 9: 1445. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Hopkins AJM, Brace AJ, Bruce JL, Hyde J, Fontaine JB, Walden L, Veber W, Ruthrof KX. 2024. Drought legacy interacts with wildfire to alter soil microbial communities in a Mediterranean climate‐type forest. Science of the Total Environment 915: 170111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Huang J, Hammerbacher A, Weinhold A, Reichelt M, Gleixner G, Behrendt T, van Dam NM, Sala A, Gershenzon J, Trumbore S et al. 2019. Eyes on the future ‐ evidence for trade‐offs between growth, storage and defense in Norway spruce. New Phytologist 222: 144–158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Huang J, Kautz M, Trowbridge AM, Hammerbacher A, Raffa KF, Adams HD, Goodsman DW, Xu C, Meddens AJH, Kandasamy D et al. 2020. Tree defence and bark beetles in a drying world: carbon partitioning, functioning and modelling. New Phytologist 225: 26–36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Jaeger ACH, Hartmann M, Conz RF, Six J, Solly EF. 2024. Prolonged water limitation shifts the soil microbiome from copiotrophic to oligotrophic lifestyles in Scots pine mesocosms. Environmental Microbiology Reports 16: e13211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Karasov T. 2023. tkarasov/Pathodopsis.
  59. Karasov TL, Neumann M, Leventhal L, Symeonidi E, Shirsekar G, Hawks A, Monroe G, Pathodopsis Team , Barragán AC, Bezrukov I et al. 2024. Continental‐scale associations of Arabidopsis thaliana phyllosphere members with host genotype and drought. Nature Microbiology 9: 2748–2758. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Kelly JJ, Bansal A, Winkelman J, Janus LR, Hell S, Wencel M, Belt P, Kuehn KA, Rier ST, Tuchman NC. 2010. Alteration of microbial communities colonizing leaf litter in a temperate woodland stream by growth of trees under conditions of elevated atmospheric CO2. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 76: 4950–4959. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Kerr KL, Fickle JC, Anderegg WRL. 2023. Decoupling of functional traits from intraspecific patterns of growth and drought stress resistance. New Phytologist 239: 174–188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Khaleghi A, Naderi R, Brunetti C, Maserti BE, Salami SA, Babalar M. 2019. Morphological, physiochemical and antioxidant responses of Maclura pomifera to drought stress. Scientific Reports 9: 19250. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Khlifa R, Renaudin M, Houle D, D'Orangeville L, Duchesne L, Kembel SW. 2025. Conifer epiphytic phyllosphere bacterial communities respond more strongly to rain exclusion and host species identity than to soil water content. Forest Ecology and Management 581: 122554. [Google Scholar]
  64. Kleiber A, Duan Q, Jansen K, Verena Junker L, Kammerer B, Rennenberg H, Ensminger I, Gessler A, Kreuzwieser J. 2017. Drought effects on root and needle terpenoid content of a coastal and an interior Douglas fir provenance. Tree Physiology 37: 1648–1658. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Koricheva J, Larsson S, Haukioja E, Keinänen M, Keinanen M. 1998. Regulation of woody plant secondary metabolism by resource availability: Hypothesis testing by means of meta‐analysis. Oikos 83: 212. [Google Scholar]
  66. Kües U, Nelson DR, Liu C, Yu G‐J, Zhang J, Li J, Wang X‐C, Sun H. 2015. Genome analysis of medicinal Ganoderma spp. with plant‐pathogenic and saprotrophic life‐styles. Phytochemistry 114: 18–37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Laoué J, Havaux M, Ksas B, Orts J‐P, Reiter IM, Fernandez C, Ormeno E. 2024. A decade of rain exclusion in a Mediterranean forest reveals trade‐offs of leaf chemical defenses and drought legacy effects. Scientific Reports 14: 24119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Lenth RV. 2025. emmeans: estimated marginal means, aka Least‐Squares means . R package v.1.10.7. [WWW document] https://rvlenth.github.io/emmeans/.
  69. Li J, Luan Q, Han J, Chen C, Ren Z. 2022. CsMYB60 confers enhanced resistance to Fusarium solani by increasing proanthocyanidin biosynthesis in cucumber. Phytopathology 112: 588–594. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Lin T, Tang J, Li S, Li S, Han S, Liu Y, Yang C, Chen G, Chen L, Zhu T. 2023. Drought stress‐mediated differences in phyllosphere microbiome and associated pathogen resistance between male and female poplars. The Plant journal: for cell and molecular biology 115: 1100–1113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Lindroth RL, Osier TL, Barnhill HRH, Wood SA. 2002. Effects of genotype and nutrient availability on phytochemistry of trembling aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.) during leaf senescence. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 30: 297–307. [Google Scholar]
  72. Lindroth RL, Wooley SC, Donaldson JR, Rubert‐Nason KF, Morrow CJ, Mock KE. 2023. Phenotypic variation in phytochemical defense of trembling Aspen in western North America: genetics, development, and geography. Journal of Chemical Ecology 49: 235–250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Love DM, Venturas MD, Sperry JS, Brooks PD, Pettit JL, Wang Y, Anderegg WRL, Tai X, Mackay DS. 2019. Dependence of Aspen stands on a subsurface water subsidy: Implications for climate change impacts. Water Resources Research 55: 1833–1848. [Google Scholar]
  74. Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. 2014. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA‐seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biology 15: 550. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Lundberg DS, Kersten S, Mehmetoğlu Boz E, Pramoj Na Ayutthaya P, Zhu W, Poersch K, Yuan W, Swartz S, Müller D, Bezrukov I et al. 2025. A major trade‐off between growth and defense in Arabidopsis thaliana can vanish in field conditions. PLoS Biology 23: e3003237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Lundberg DS, Yourstone S, Mieczkowski P, Jones CD, Dangl JL. 2013. Practical innovations for high‐throughput amplicon sequencing. Nature Methods 10: 999–1002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Malone SC, Thompson RA, Chow PS, de Oliveira CR Jr, Landhäusser SM, Six DL, McCulloh KA, Adams HD, Trowbridge AM. 2025. Water, not carbon, drives drought‐constraints on stem terpene defense against simulated bark beetle attack in Pinus edulis . New Phytologist 245: 318–331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Marchetti SB, Worrall JJ, Eager T. 2011. Secondary insects and diseases contribute to sudden aspen decline in southwestern Colorado, USA. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 41: 2315–2325. [Google Scholar]
  79. Mattos MMG, Filho SA, Martins GR, Venturi LS, Canetti VB, Ferreira FA, Foguel D, da Silva AS. 2025. Antimicrobial and antibiofilm properties of procyanidins: potential for clinical and biotechnological applications. Critical Reviews in Microbiology 51: 670–693. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Maupetit A, Larbat R, Pernaci M, Andrieux A, Guinet C, Boutigny A‐L, Fabre B, Frey P, Halkett F. 2018. Defense compounds rather than nutrient availability shape aggressiveness trait variation along a leaf maturity gradient in a biotrophic plant pathogen. Frontiers in Plant Science 9: 1396. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Mazerolle MJ. 2023. : Model selection and multimodel inference based on (Q)AIC(c) . R package v.2.3.4. [WWW document] URL https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=AICcmodavg.
  82. McGillycuddy M, Warton DI, Popovic G, Bolker BM. 2025. Parsimoniously fitting large multivariate random effects in glmmTMB. Journal of Statistical Software 112: 1–19. [Google Scholar]
  83. McMurdie PJ, Holmes S. 2013. phyloseq: an R package for reproducible interactive analysis and graphics of microbiome census data. PLoS ONE 8: e61217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Mock KE, Callahan CM, Islam‐Faridi MN, Shaw JD, Rai HS, Sanderson SC, Rowe CA, Ryel RJ, Madritch MD, Gardner RS et al. 2012. Widespread triploidy in Western North American aspen (Populus tremuloides). PLoS ONE 7: e48406. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Moroldo M, Blanchet N, Duruflé H, Bernillon S, Berton T, Fernandez O, Gibon Y, Moing A, Langlade NB. 2024. Genetic control of abiotic stress‐related specialized metabolites in sunflower. BMC Genomics 25: 199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Munné‐Bosch S, Alegre L. 2000. Changes in carotenoids, tocopherols and diterpenes during drought and recovery, and the biological significance of chlorophyll loss in Rosmarinus officinalis plants. Planta 210: 925–931. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Nakabayashi R, Saito K. 2015. Integrated metabolomics for abiotic stress responses in plants. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 24: 10–16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Nogués I, Llusià J, Ogaya R, Munné‐Bosch S, Sardans J, Peñuelas J, Loreto F. 2014. Physiological and antioxidant responses of Quercus ilexto drought in two different seasons. Plant Biosystems 148: 268–278. [Google Scholar]
  89. Oksanen J, Simpson GL, Blanchet FG, Kindt R, Legendre P, Minchin PR, O'Hara RB, Solymos P, Stevens MHH, Szoecs E et al. 2025. vegan: community ecology package . R package v.2.7.2. [WWW document] URL http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan.
  90. Paradis E, Claude J, Strimmer K. 2004. ape: analyses of phylogenetics and evolution in R language. Bioinformatics 20: 289–290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Peñuelas J, Rico L, Ogaya R, Jump AS, Terradas J. 2012. Summer season and long‐term drought increase the richness of bacteria and fungi in the foliar phyllosphere of Quercus ilex in a mixed Mediterranean forest. Plant Biology 14: 565–575. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Piasecka A, Sawikowska A, Kuczyńska A, Ogrodowicz P, Mikołajczak K, Krystkowiak K, Gudyś K, Guzy‐Wróbelska J, Krajewski P, Kachlicki P. 2017. Drought‐related secondary metabolites of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) leaves and their metabolomic quantitative trait loci. The Plant Journal 89: 898–913. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Põlme S, Abarenkov K, Henrik Nilsson R, Lindahl BD, Clemmensen KE, Kauserud H, Nguyen N, Kjøller R, Bates ST, Baldrian P et al. 2020. FungalTraits: a user‐friendly traits database of fungi and fungus‐like stramenopiles. Fungal Diversity 105: 1–1–16. [Google Scholar]
  94. Porter LJ, Hrstich LN, Chan BG. 1985. The conversion of procyanidins and prodelphinidins to cyanidin and delphinidin. Phytochemistry 25: 223–230. [Google Scholar]
  95. Qiu P, Nguyen V, Guan G, Li Y, Takamatsu S, Liu S. 2018. Occurrence of powdery mildew caused by Golovinomyces orontii on Lactuca sativa var. ramosa (lettuce) in China. Crop Protection 110: 108–111. [Google Scholar]
  96. Rashad YM, El‐Sharkawy HHA, Abdalla SA, Ibrahim OM, Elazab NT. 2025. Unraveling the regulating effect of the endophyte Epicoccum italicum HE20 on the biosynthesis genes of polyphenols in wheat in response to yellow rust. Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology 138: 102705. [Google Scholar]
  97. Regalado J, Lundberg DS, Deusch O, Kersten S. 2020. Combining whole‐genome shotgun sequencing and rRNA gene amplicon analyses to improve detection of microbe–microbe interaction networks in plant leaves. ISME Journal 14: 2116–2130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Rico L, Ogaya R, Terradas J, Peñuelas J. 2014. Community structures of N2 ‐fixing bacteria associated with the phyllosphere of a Holm oak forest and their response to drought. Plant Biology 16: 586–593. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. Rivas‐Ubach A, Gargallo‐Garriga A, Sardans J, Oravec M, Mateu‐Castell L, Pérez‐Trujillo M, Peñuelas J. 2014. Drought enhances folivory by shifting foliar metabolomes in Quercus ilex trees. New Phytologist 202: 874–885. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. Rubert‐Nason KF, Couture JJ, Gryzmala EA, Townsend PA, Lindroth RL. 2017. Vernal freeze damage and genetic variation alter tree growth, chemistry, and insect interactions. Plant, Cell & Environment 40: 2743–2753. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  101. Rubert‐Nason K, Keefover‐Ring K, Lindroth RL. 2018. Purification and analysis of salicinoids. Current Analytical Chemistry 14: 423–429. [Google Scholar]
  102. Rubert‐Nason KF, Lindroth RL. 2021. Causes and consequences of condensed tannin variation in Populus . In: Recent advances in polyphenol research. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 69–112. [Google Scholar]
  103. Sarker U, Oba S. 2018. Drought stress effects on growth, ROS markers, compatible solutes, phenolics, flavonoids, and antioxidant activity in Amaranthus tricolor . Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology 186: 999–999–1016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  104. Sasi S, Krishnan S, Kodackattumannil P, Shamisi AA, Aldarmaki M, Lekshmi G, Kottackal M, Amiri KMA. 2023. DNA‐free high‐quality RNA extraction from 39 difficult‐to‐extract plant species (representing seasonal tissues and tissue types) of 32 families, and its validation for downstream molecular applications. Plant Methods 19: 84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  105. Schmid R, Heuckeroth S, Korf A, Smirnov A, Myers O, Dyrlund TS, Bushuiev R, Murray KJ, Hoffmann N, Lu M et al. 2023. Integrative analysis of multimodal mass spectrometry data in MZmine 3. Nature Biotechnology 41: 447–449. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  106. Schweitzer JA, Madritch MD, Bailey JK, LeRoy CJ, Fischer DG, Rehill BJ, Lindroth RL, Hagerman AE, Wooley SC, Hart SC et al. 2008. From genes to ecosystems: The genetic basis of condensed tannins and their role in nutrient regulation in a Populus model system. Ecosystems 11: 1005–1020. [Google Scholar]
  107. Shamloo M, Babawale EA, Furtado A, Henry RJ, Eck PK, Jones PJH. 2017. Effects of genotype and temperature on accumulation of plant secondary metabolites in Canadian and Australian wheat grown under controlled environments. Scientific Reports 7: 9133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  108. Sharma M, Kumar P, Verma V, Sharma R, Bhargava B, Irfan M. 2022. Understanding plant stress memory response for abiotic stress resilience: molecular insights and prospects. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 179: 10–24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  109. Siddique AB, Parveen S, Rahman MZ, Rahman J. 2024. Revisiting plant stress memory: mechanisms and contribution to stress adaptation. Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants 30: 349–367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  110. Singh BK, Delgado‐Baquerizo M, Egidi E, Guirado E, Leach JE, Liu H, Trivedi P. 2023. Climate change impacts on plant pathogens, food security and paths forward. Nature Reviews. Microbiology 21: 640–656. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  111. Stoffel MA, Nakagawa S, Schielzeth H. 2021. partR2: Partitioning R2 in generalized linear mixed models. PeerJ 9: e11414. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  112. Thompson RA, Malone SC, Peltier D, Six D, Robertson N, Oliveira C Jr, McIntire CD, Pockman WT, McDowell NG, Trowbridge AM et al. 2024. Local carbon reserves are insufficient for phloem terpene induction during drought in Pinus edulis in response to bark beetle‐associated fungi. New Phytologist 244: 654–669. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  113. Trivedi P, Leach JE, Tringe SG, Sa T, Singh BK. 2020. Plant‐microbiome interactions: from community assembly to plant health. Nature Reviews. Microbiology 18: 607–621. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  114. Trugman AT, Anderegg LDL, Anderegg WRL, Das AJ, Stephenson NL. 2021. Why is Tree Drought Mortality so Hard to Predict?. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 36: 520–532. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  115. Tsuneda A, Davey ML, Hambleton S, Currah RS. 2008. Endosporium, a new endoconidial genus allied to the Myriangiales. Botany 86: 1020–1033. [Google Scholar]
  116. Tyagi K, Kumar P, Pandey A, Ginwal HS, Barthwal S, Nautiyal R, Meena RK. 2023. First record of Cladosporium Oxysporum as a potential novel fungal hyperparasite of Melampsora Medusae f. Sp. Deltoidae and screening of Populus Deltoides Clones against leaf rust. 3 Biotech 13: 213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  117. Ullah C, Unsicker SB, Fellenberg C, Constabel CP, Schmidt A, Gershenzon J, Hammerbacher A. 2017. Flavan‐3‐ols are an effective chemical defense against rust infection. Plant Physiology 175: 1560–1578. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  118. Van Nuland MV, Daws SC, Bailey J, Schweitzer J, Busby P, Peay K. 2023. Above‐ and belowground fungal biodiversity of Populus trees on a continental scale. Nature Microbiology 8: 2406–2419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  119. Winder RS, Lamarche J, Constabel CP, Hamelin RC. 2013. The effects of high‐tannin leaf litter from transgenic poplars on microbial communities in microcosm soils. Frontiers in Microbiology 4: 290. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  120. Wiseman MS, Bates T, Garfinkel A, Ocamb CM, Gent DH. 2021. First report of powdery mildew caused by Golovinomyces ambrosiae on Cannabis sativa in Oregon. Plant Disease 105: 2733. [Google Scholar]
  121. Worrall J, Fairweather M. 2009. Decay and discoloration of Aspen. Forest insect & disease leaflet 149, FS‐R6‐RO‐FIDL#149/005‐2009. Portland, Oregon: USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Region. [Google Scholar]
  122. Worrall JJ, Keck AG, Marchetti SB. 2015. Populus tremuloides stands continue to deteriorate after drought‐incited sudden aspen decline. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 45: 1768–1774. [Google Scholar]
  123. Worrall JJ, Marchetti SB, Egeland L, Mask RA, Eager T, Howell B. 2010. Effects and etiology of sudden aspen decline in southwestern Colorado, USA. Forest Ecology and Management 260: 638–648. [Google Scholar]
  124. Zhu Y‐G, Xiong C, Wei Z, Chen Q‐L, Ma B, Zhou S‐Y‐D, Tan J, Zhang L‐M, Cui H‐L, Duan G‐L. 2022. Impacts of global change on the phyllosphere microbiome. New Phytologist 234: 1977–1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Fig. S1 Multivariate patterns of Populus tremuloides foliar chemistry across drought treatments.

Fig. S2 Drought legacy effects on Populus tremuloides allocation to individual salicinoid phenolic glycosides.

Fig. S3 Changes in allocation to Populus tremuloides defensive chemistry differ among drought treatments.

Fig. S4 Drought legacy effects on individual salicinoid phenolic glycosides in Populus tremuloides.

Fig. S5 Relationship between Populus tremuloides salicinoid phenolic glycoside allocation and relative growth rate depends on prior‐year drought treatment.

Fig. S6 Relative abundance of dominant fungal genera across field sites in 2023.

Fig. S7 Genus‐level composition of foliar fungal communities across drought treatments in the common garden.

Fig. S8 Constrained ordination of foliar fungal communities from Populus tremuloides in the common garden.

Fig. S9 Concordance between model‐estimated drought effects and observed changes in relative abundance of fungal genera in common garden aspen (Populus tremuloides).

Methods S1 Common garden design and drought treatment.

Table S1 ITS PCR Oligos (from Lundberg et al., 2013; Regalado et al., 2020).

Table S2 Beta‐binomial GLMM results for taxa most associated with drought‐stressed P. tremuloides in the common garden with corresponding results from the comparison between the driest (Uncompahgre National Forest) and wettest (Uinta National Forest) sampled field sites.

Please note: Wiley is not responsible for the content or functionality of any Supporting Information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing material) should be directed to the New Phytologist Central Office.

NPH-252-1413-s001.pdf (1.3MB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

Sequencing data are available on the SRA database, accession PRJNA1372733. Sample metadata and chemistry data are available through Dryad: doi: 10.5061/dryad.bzkh189qb. Scripts are available at https://github.com/AubreyHawks/aspen_chem_microbiome.


Articles from The New Phytologist are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES