Skip to main content
Biophysical Journal logoLink to Biophysical Journal
. 1969 May;9(5):729–757. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(69)86414-3

Electroosmosis in Membranes: Effects of Unstirred Layers and Transport Numbers

II. Experimental

P H Barry, A B Hope
PMCID: PMC1367750  PMID: 5786318

Abstract

In an earlier paper, it was shown that the differences in transport numbers in membranes and adjacent solutions will result in a depletion and enhancement of the local concentration profiles at the appropriate interfaces. These should, in general, cause both current-induced volume flows and transient changes in membrane potential difference (PD). The predicted concentration changes were measured near an isolated segment of plant cell wall just after a current pulse. The current-induced volume flows observed were separated into a “transport number component” and an instantaneous, electroosmotic one for both cell walls and whole cells. For walls, the electroosmotic component contributed about 53 moles · Faraday-1 to a total coefficient of 112 moles · Faraday-1. For whole cells, the average electroosmotic component (for both hyperpolarizing and depolarizing currents) contributed about 38 moles · Faraday-1 to a total of about 100 moles · Faraday-1. There was good agreement between the magnitudes and time courses of the flows and membrane PD's predicted from the theory in the previous paper, and those measured in both cell walls and whole cells.

Full text

PDF
729

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Barry P. H., Hope A. B. Electroosmosis in membranes: effects of unstirred layers and transport numbers. I. Theory. Biophys J. 1969 May;9(5):700–728. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(69)86413-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Coster H. G. A quantitative analysis of the voltage-current relationships of fixed charge membranes and the associated property of "punch-through". Biophys J. 1965 Sep;5(5):669–686. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(65)86745-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. GAFFEY C. T., MULLINS L. J. Ion fluxes during the action potential in Chara. J Physiol. 1958 Dec 30;144(3):505–524. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1958.sp006116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Mailman D. S., Mullins L. J. The electrical measurement of chloride fluxes in Nitella. Aust J Biol Sci. 1966 Jun;19(3):385–398. doi: 10.1071/bi9660385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biophysical Journal are provided here courtesy of The Biophysical Society

RESOURCES