Skip to main content

This is a preprint.

It has not yet been peer reviewed by a journal.

The National Library of Medicine is running a pilot to include preprints that result from research funded by NIH in PMC and PubMed.

bioRxiv logoLink to bioRxiv
[Preprint]. 2026 Aug 31:2026.08.20.745964. [Version 2] doi: 10.64898/2026.08.20.745964

Spatio-temporally regulated maternal RNA decay factor essential for zebrafish development

Gopal Kushawah 1, Victor Daniel Aldas Bulos 1, Danielson Baia Amaral 1, Huzaifa Hassan 1, Stephanie H Nowotarski 1, Ariel A Bazzini 1,2
PMCID: PMC13684608  PMID: 42922634

Summary

Maternal mRNA decay is essential for the Maternal-to-Zygotic Transition (MZT), yet its impact on spatial regulation has remained largely unexplored. We identify Cth1 as the first maternally encoded RNA-decay factor regulated in a spatiotemporal manner outside the germline in zebrafish, driven by conserved 3′UTR cis-elements. RfxCas13d-mediated depletion of maternal cth1 revealed early developmental defects that could not be assessed with SpyCas9 mutants due to infertility from impaired gametogenesis. Mechanistically, Cth1 acts independently of zygotic genome activation, recognizing AU-rich motifs in maternal 3′UTRs to promote deadenylation and decay in a spatio-temporal manner; deletion of these motifs or depletion of Cth1 stabilizes both reporter and endogenous transcripts. These findings establish Cth1 as a key component of the maternal program and provide the first direct evidence that spatio-temporally regulated mRNA decay, outside the germline, contributes to early vertebrate development.

Keywords: Spatio-temporal maternal RNAs, RNA decay, CRISPR-Cas13d, CRISPR-Cas9, Cth1, Embryonic lethal, Gametogenesis, RNA-decay factor, Zebrafish, MZT

Introduction

The maternal-to-zygotic transition (MZT) is a critical phase in eukaryotic embryogenesis characterized by the degradation of maternal messengers RNAs (mRNAs) and transcriptional activation of the zygotic genome (Giraldez et al, 2006; Kojima et al, 2025; Vastenhouw et al, 2019; Walser & Lipshitz, 2011). Initially, maternal mRNAs deposited by the female into the oocyte prior to fertilization regulate early embryonic development. Timely clearance of these maternal mRNAs is essential to ensure proper embryogenesis. Mechanisms regulating the decay of maternal mRNAs can be classified based on whether they are dependent on zygotic transcription. A maternally directed program functions independently or prior to zygotic transcription, whereas a zygotically directed program requires active zygotic transcription (Brantley & Di Talia, 2024; Giraldez et al, 2006; Kojima et al, 2025; Kontur et al, 2020). Thus, maternal RNA clearance pathways may originate either from maternal cytoplasmic factors inherited within the oocyte or from factors synthesized de novo from the zygotic genome (Kojima et al, 2025).

In different vertebrates, the zygotic program includes microRNAs, such as miR-430 in zebrafish or miR-427 in Xenopus, which are zygotically expressed and facilitate the clearance of many maternal and zygotic mRNAs (Baia Amaral et al, 2024; Bazzini et al, 2012; Giraldez et al, 2006; Lund et al, 2009). In contrast, in zebrafish and Xenopus embryos the maternal program utilizes codon optimality, where translation, influenced by codon usage, directly impacts mRNA stability (Bazzini et al, 2016; Mishima & Tomari, 2016). Additional maternal clearance pathways involve RNA-binding proteins that recognize distinct cis-elements. Examples include YTHDF (M6A modification) and TUT4/7 (Uridylation) in zebrafish (Chang et al, 2018; Kontur et al, 2020; Zhao et al, 2017), Smaug and BRAT in Drosophila (Laver et al, 2015; Tadros et al, 2007), EDEN-BP/Celf1 in Xenopus (Paillard et al, 1998), BTG4 and PABPN1L in mouse (Liu et al, 2016; Yu et al, 2016; Zhao et al, 2020). The ZFP36L family of proteins, which target AU-rich elements in 3′UTRs, have been implicated in mRNA clearance during mouse oocyte maturation leading to female infertility (Ball et al, 2014; Ramos, 2012). However, their contribution to mRNA clearance during the MZT remains unclear (Sha et al, 2018). AU-rich elements associated with unstable mRNAs have been reported across species, including Xenopus (Audic et al, 1998), Drosophila (Choi et al, 2014) and zebrafish (te Kronnie et al, 1999; Vejnar et al, 2019). However, the identity and functional relevance of the factors recognizing these elements during early embryogenesis remain largely unresolved.

Most studies on maternal mRNA degradation in zebrafish have relied on bulk mRNA sequencing, treating the embryo as a homogeneous entity and focusing on temporal dynamics (Baia Amaral et al, 2024; Bazzini et al, 2016; Giraldez et al, 2006; Vejnar et al, 2019). While these approaches have deepened our understanding of the timing of maternal mRNA clearance, they do not provide insight into potential spatial differences in mRNA distribution. Emerging single-cell and spatial transcriptomic methods offer new opportunities to study RNA accumulation with spatial resolution. However, the functional significance of spatially distinct mRNAs and the mechanisms underlying their spatial distribution during early development remain largely unexplored (Fishman et al, 2024; Holler et al, 2021; Satija et al, 2015; Wan et al, 2026).

In many cases where mRNAs show spatially restricted patterns, localized zygotic transcription can often explain the cell specific accumulation (Das et al, 2021; Martin & Ephrussi, 2009). However, for maternal mRNAs, differential spatial degradation provides an alternative mechanism for generating regional mRNA accumulation. Indeed, earlier studies in zebrafish, Drosophila, and sea urchin have demonstrated spatially regulated maternal mRNA decay resulting in maternal mRNAs accumulation in the germline (Gavis & Lehmann, 1992; Koprunner et al, 2001; Oulhen et al, 2013; Pamula & Lehmann, 2024). In zebrafish, for example, nanos1 and tdrd7 mRNAs prevent miR-430-mediated degradation in primordial germ cells due to protection by the germline-specific RNA-binding protein Dead end 1 (Dnd1), resulting in localized mRNA stability (Kedde et al, 2007; Mishima et al, 2006). However, the broader functional significance of spatially regulated maternal mRNA localization and particularly for genes outside of germline contexts, remains largely unexplored. This gap in knowledge is due in part to the historical lack of tools capable of efficiently and selectively manipulating maternal RNAs in early vertebrate embryos.

Here, we exploit new approaches to identify cth1 as a previously uncharacterized, maternally deposited mRNA decay factor in zebrafish. Phylogenetic analyses and previous studies indicate that cth1 has conserved orthologs across yeast, fish, and mammals, including the vertebrate ZFP36L gene family (Makita et al, 2021; Martinez-Pastor et al, 2013; Stevens et al, 1998; Treguer et al, 2013). These orthologs have been shown to promote mRNA decay by binding AU-rich elements in 3′UTRs in yeast, Xenopus, mouse and humans, implicating them in diverse RNA metabolic pathways (Baou et al, 2011; Barlit et al, 2024; Bye et al, 2018; Cicchetto et al, 2023; Cook et al, 2022; Rynne et al, 2023). In zebrafish, we found that cth1 exhibits spatiotemporal instability driven by its 3′UTR. Using CRISPR-RfxCas13d and SpyCas9, we reveal its essential roles in maternal mRNA clearance during the MZT and in gametogenesis. Further, Cth1 mediates the deadenylation and decay of mRNAs through AU-rich elements in their 3′UTRs and functions independently of zygotic transcription. This study establishes Cth1 as a maternal factor regulating mRNA stability prior and independent of the zygotic genome activation, and as the first mRNA shown to display spatiotemporal dynamics due to stability mechanisms outside the germline.

Results

Cth1 is one of the most highly maternally deposited mRNAs but is rapidly degraded during the maternal-to-zygotic transition

Maternal mRNA decay has predominantly been studied in a temporal dimension, with the strong evidence for spatial regulation in vertebrate embryos coming from germ cells, where selected maternal transcripts are protected while the same transcripts decay in neighboring somatic cells (Koprunner et al, 2001; Mishima et al, 2006; Oulhen et al, 2013). Whether spatially restricted maternal mRNA decay/protection also occurs beyond germ cells, and whether it contributes to early embryonic development, remains unsolved. To search for maternal RNAs regulated in this manner outside the germline, we analyzed single-cell/spatial transcriptomics and SLAM-seq (Baia Amaral et al, 2024; Satija et al, 2015). From the initial analysis of these datasets, we narrowed down to Cth1. Ribo-Zero and poly(A)-enriched RNA-seq analyses across early embryogenesis identified cth1 as one of the most abundant maternal transcripts, ranking within the top 75 in both ribosomal RNA–depleted and poly(A)-enriched datasets (Figs. 1A and S1A) [45]. After fertilization, a substantial fraction of maternal mRNAs exhibits short poly(A) tails (Chang et al, 2018), as indicated by their lower abundance in poly(A)-enriched libraries compared to total RNA, also known as poly(A)-tail status (Fig. 1B) (Medina-Munoz et al, 2021). These mRNAs typically undergo polyadenylation within the first ~2 hours post-fertilization (hpf) (Fig. 1B), as clearly illustrated by comparing poly(A)-selected mRNA levels against total RNA depleted of ribosomal RNA (Medina-Munoz et al, 2021). Interestingly, cth1 mRNAs are maternally provided with extended poly(A)-tails, exhibiting one of the highest poly(A)-tail status at 0 hpf (top 75) (Fig. 1B).

Figure 1. Cth1 is one of the most highly maternally deposited mRNAs but is rapidly degraded during the maternal-to-zygotic transition.

Figure 1.

A. Ribosomal RNA depleted RNA sequencing (Ribo-zero) time course (0–8 hpf) showing cth1 mRNA is among the top maternally deposited (top 75) mRNA at 0 hpf while getting rapidly degraded with time by 8 hpf. Data is derived from SG Medina-Muñoz et al., Genome Biology, 2021.

B. Poly(A)-status measured as the fold change between PolyA and Ribo-zero RNA sequencing at different time points showing that cth1 is one of the maternal RNA provided with already extended Poly(A)-tail (0 hpf) while getting deadenylated over time. Data is derived from SG Medina-Muñoz et al., Genome Biology, 2021.

C. mRNA decay measured as fold change between PolyA RNA sequencing at 2 hpf and indicated time point (2–8 hpf) showing that cth1 mRNA is one of the most unstable mRNA (top 20). Data is derived from SG Medina-Muñoz et al., Genome Biology, 2021.

D. mRNA decay in the absence of zygotic expression measured as fold change between polyA RNA sequencing at 2 hpf and indicated time point (2.5–7.5 hpf) from embryos injected with α-amanitin showing that cth1 mRNA degradation is maternally programmed independent of zygotic transcription. Data is derived from SG Medina-Muñoz et al., Genome Biology, 2021.

E. Whole mount Hybridization Chain Reaction (HCR) showing spatio-temporal cth1 mRNA (red) distribution and DAPI (blue) staining at 2 and 6 hpf zebrafish embryos. Scale bar, 100 μm.

F. SLAM-seq time course (1–6 hpf) showing the maternal (unlabeled) and zygotic (labeled) contribution for cth1 indicating that even at 6 hpf the maternal contribution is predominant compared to the zygotic. Data is derived from DB Amaral et al., Genome Biology, 2024.

Despite its high initial abundance and high poly(A)-tail status, cth1 mRNA is remarkably unstable (top 20), rapidly decaying within the first 8 hpf (Fig. 1C, Fig. S1A). This rapid degradation is evidenced by pronounced fold changes relative to 0 hpf in Ribo-Zero (Fig. S1B) and to 2 hpf in poly(A)-selected RNA-seq datasets (Fig. 1C). To further characterize cth1 dynamics, we analyzed SLAM-seq data during early embryogenesis (Baia Amaral et al, 2024). This technique distinguishes newly synthesized mRNAs from pre-existing ones by incorporating a uridine analog into nascent RNAs, which are later identified as T>C mutations during sequencing (Baia Amaral et al, 2024; Bhat et al, 2023; Herzog et al, 2017). SLAM-seq allows gene-specific quantification of both labeled (zygotic) and unlabeled (maternal) mRNAs and provides direct measurements of mRNA stability based on the persistence of unlabeled RNA. Using this approach, we confirmed that cth1 is highly unstable, as reflected by its rapid loss from the unlabeled fraction (Fig. S1C).

The instability of cth1 persisted in embryos injected with α-amanitin, indicating that its degradation is maternally programmed and independent of zygotic factors (Fig. 1D). Consistent with this observation, cth1 degradation was also unaffected in Maternal-Zygotic-dicer mutants (lacking functional miR-430) demonstrating that its decay is independent of the miR-430 pathway (Fig. S1D). Ribosome profiling further reveals high ribosome occupancy and translational efficiency for cth1 during early development (Fig. S1E), a pattern characteristic of transcripts previously shown to play critical roles in early embryogenesis (da Silva Pescador et al, 2024; Lee et al, 2013) and suggesting an important early function for Cth1.

Interestingly, despite rapid global degradation, cth1 mRNA exhibited distinct localization to the embryo margin at 6 hpf based on whole-mount Hybridization Chain Reaction (HCR) assays (Fig. 1E) and whole embryo reconstruction based on single cells sequence and weMERFISH (Satija et al, 2015; Wan et al, 2026) (Fig. S1F). HCR assays revealed a uniform distribution at 2 hpf, followed by clear marginal enrichment at 6 hpf (Fig. 1E). These results raised two potential hypotheses: (i) maternal cth1 mRNAs are entirely degraded, and cell-specific zygotic transcription drives marginal localization, or (ii) maternal cth1 undergoes spatially regulated degradation (or cell-specific stabilization), resulting in marginal enrichment. Supporting the latter hypothesis, SLAM-seq analysis revealed a predominance of unlabeled cth1 mRNAs at 6 hpf, indicating maternal origin rather than new transcription (Fig. 1F). Collectively, these data strongly suggest that the marginal localization of cth1 mRNA results from spatially regulated maternal mRNA decay rather than zygotic transcription.

The cth1 3′UTR harbors cis-regulatory elements driving marginal localization

Inspired by the ability of the nanos 3′UTR to mediate germline localization during embryogenesis (Koprunner et al, 2001), we tested whether the cth1 marginal localization depends on cis-regulatory elements within its 3′UTR. We co-injected single-cell stage zebrafish embryos with TagRFP mRNA as an internal control and GFP mRNA fused either to the cth1 3′UTR or the control 3′UTR (non-zebrafish 3′UTR sequence) (Fig. 2A). Using HCR, we visualized the ectopic mRNA distribution at 2.5, 4, 5, and 6 hpf (Fig. 2B). GFP mRNA containing the cth1 3′UTR exhibited robust marginal localization at 5 and 6 hpf, whereas TagRFP and GFP fused to the control 3′UTR remained uniformly distributed (Fig. 2B). These findings suggest the presence of cis-regulatory elements within the cth1 3′UTR sufficient to drive marginal enrichment. The encoded GFP protein (signal) also accumulated in the same marginal domain, suggesting that the cth1 3′UTR directs both transcript localization and local protein production during gastrulation (Fig. 2C).

Figure 2. The cth1 3′UTR harbors cis-regulatory elements driving marginal localization.

Figure 2.

A. Schematic illustration of the injection strategy used to assess mRNA localization and protein distribution at 6 hpf. mRNAs encoding GFP containing either the cth1 3′UTR or a control 3′UTR were co-injected with a tagRFP mRNA as an injection control.

B. GFP and TagRFP HCR showing that all injected mRNAs were uniformly distributed at 2 hpi, but then, only GFP-cth1-3’UTR mRNA was localized to the marginal region over time, while the GFP-β-globin 3′UTR and TagRFP mRNA remain uniformly distributed across the embryo. Scale bar, 100 μm.

C. HCR combined with fluorescence imaging showing mRNA (magenta) and protein (green) localization at 6 hpf. GFP-cth1-3′UTR mRNA and its encoded protein are preferentially enriched at the embryonic margin, whereas GFP fused to a control 3′UTR (non-zebrafish sequence) shows uniform distribution throughout the embryo. The co-injected tagRFP mRNA (yellow) remains uniformly distributed. The rightmost panel shows a magnified view of GFP protein localization at the margin. Non-injected embryos were included as controls; residual green signal reflects autofluorescence from the yolk, which is detectable due to the high exposure times which is required to image low GFP levels at this stage. DAPI (cyan) marks nuclei. Scale bar, 100 μm.

D. Schematics represents the tilling array of 50 nt cth1 3’UTR fragments library injections, the stability of the of fragments was assayed by comparing library-specific RNA-seq from embryos collected at 2 and 8 hpi.v

E. Heat map showing the stability of different cth1 3’UTR fragments between 8 and 2 hpi. Cyan color indicates unstable regions, black color non-responding region and yellow stable regions. The number represent the 5’position of the fragment with respect to cth1 3’UTR.

F. GFP-control 3′UTR and TagRFP HCR showing that all injected mRNAs were uniformly distributed at 2.5 hpi, but then, only GFP-containing the unstable cth1-3’UTR 50 nt fragments (unstable, 1, 2, and 3) identified by the tilling library gets enriched to the marginal region at 6 hpi, while the GFP containing one stable cth1-3’UTR 50 nt fragment (tilling array library) and other injected control TagRFP mRNA display uniform distribution across the embryo. Scale bar, 200 μm.

G. Bar plot showing normalized HCR RNA quantification for GFP vs TagRFP RNAs between two regions of the same embryos (anterior vs. marginal) for different cth1 3′UTR fragments and controls. n represents the number of embryos analyzed.

H. Conservation across vertebrates UCSC tracks showing that the three unstable fragments of cth1 3’UTR are conserved (green color).

To further dissect these cis-regulatory regions within the cth1 3′UTR, we generated a tiling library consisting of 80 overlapping 50-nucleotide (nt) fragments from the cth1 3′UTR (≤5-nt sliding windows) (Fig. 2D). Each fragment was cloned downstream of GFP to mimic the full-length construct. As a control, we included 20 fragments spanning the sod1 3′UTR, known to contain a functional miR-430 target site. Following injection of the mRNA library into single-cell embryos, RNA was collected at 2- and 8-hours post-injection for specific library sequencing (Fig. 2D). As expected, sod1 fragments containing miR-430 target sites displayed pronounced instability over time, validating our approach for identifying destabilizing elements (Figs. S2A, S2B). In the cth1 3′UTR, we identified three regions where fragments showed significant downregulation over time (Figs. 2E, S2C).

We next examined whether these destabilizing fragments were sufficient to drive marginal localization. Three 50-nt fragments containing each cth1 3′UTR destabilizing fragment and a cth1 50-nt non-responsive fragment were individually cloned as 3′UTR of GFP mRNA and injected into single-cell embryos alongside TagRFP as an internal control (Fig. 2F). At 2 hpf, all injected mRNAs were uniformly distributed (Fig. 2F). By 6 hpf, however, GFP mRNAs containing the individual destabilizing fragments displayed different degrees of RNA decay leading to marginal patterning (Figs. 2F-G and S2D), whereas non-responsive fragments and control mRNAs (TagRFP) remained uniformly distributed (Figs. 2F-G, S2D). Interestingly, these destabilizing regions were conserved across fish species (Fig. 2H). Consistent with the individual fragment results, combining all three destabilizing regions into a single 175-nt fragment produced an additive effect on decay and marginal localization (Figs. 2G, S2D-E).

Together, our results indicate that these three conserved 3′UTR regions contain cis-regulatory elements that contribute to regulation of spatiotemporal mRNA decay, thereby driving marginal localization of cth1. The evolutionary conservation underscores the potential significance of this regulatory mechanism across fish species.

Cth1 F0 mutants do not exhibit early developmental defects but display severe infertility

Given that cth1 localization during early embryogenesis occurs independently of its zygotic expression (Fig. 2) and that the zygotic contribution of cth1 is minimal at early developmental stages (Fig. 1F), we hypothesized that F0 cth1 mutants might lack early developmental phenotypes. To test this, we generated F0 cth1 mutants by co-injecting SpyCas9 mRNA with either individual or combined guide RNAs (gRNAs) targeting the cth1 coding region (Fig. 3A). We confirmed high mutagenesis efficiency (>85%) at 24 hpf by sequencing all targeted cth1 loci along with the albino gene, which was also targeted independently as a positive control (Fig. 3B). Embryos injected with SpyCas9 and gRNAs targeting albino displayed the expected pigmentation loss (Fig. S3A). Consistent with our hypothesis, despite the high mutagenesis rate (Fig. 3A), no developmental defects were observed in cth1 F0 mutant embryos at 6 and 24 hpf compared to SpyCas9-alone or uninjected controls (SpyCas9 alone, gRNA and albino) (p ≥ 0.15, SpyCas9 alone vs SpyCas9 plus each gRNA, chi-square test) (Fig. 3C, S3B). This suggests that early embryonic development does not significantly rely on the low zygotic cth1 expression.

Figure 3. Cth1 F0 mutants do not exhibit early developmental defects but display severe infertility.

Figure 3.

A. Schematic illustration showing that SpyCas9 mRNA and individual or group of three gRNAs were injected at one cell zebrafish embryo and phenotypes were observed at 6 hpf and 1 dpf as well as mutation rate was calculated by genotyping at 1dpf embryos.

B. Boxplot is showing the high percentage of SpyCas9 indel mutation associated with zygotic copies of cth1 gene at 1 dpf embryos from individual gRNAs as well as set of 3 combined gRNAs. Cas9 alone and albino gene are negative and positive controls respectively. n represents the numbers of embryos sequenced for each condition.

C. Representative images and stack bar plot showing that no major developmental phenotypes were observed from F0 embryos injected with any of the guideRNAs and/or SpyCas9 combination. Different intensities of gray color are directly associated with severity of developmental phenotype (Class III (most severe) and white (wildtype). n represents the numbers of embryos analyzed at 1 dpf. Scale bar, 0.5mm.

D. Representative images of adult cth1 mutant fish (SpyCas9) with their corresponding wildtype controls. Top panel is for males and bottom for females. All the fish are 14 months old and apparently looking normal. Scale bar 1cm.

E. Representative embryos images after crossing wildtype and/or SpyCas9 cth1 F0 mutants (red color text) adults. Mutant females produced either dead or unfertilized embryos, mutants’ males produced unfertilized embryos, while wildtype crosses produced viable embryos. (Panels show 1.5 hpf, 5 hpf and 24 hpf embryos). Scale bar, 1000 μm.

F. Representative images showing that oocytes from two independent cth1 Cas9 mutant females are white, fragmented and degraded compared to oocytes from wildtype female. Scale bar 1000 μm.

G. Representative scanning electron images of mature sperm from wild type and from independent cth1 mutant males showing the abnormal morphology, wrinkled degraded head and tail with different morphologies ranging from no tail, short, to multiple fragmented tails phenotypes. Scale bar is 3 μm.

Although F0 mutants developed into apparently normal adults (Fig. 3D), both mutant males and females exhibited severe infertility problems (Fig. 3E). Crosses involving either cth1 F0 mutant males or females with wildtype fish, or crosses between mutants, consistently resulted in unviable or degraded embryos (Fig. 3E). Adult F0 mutants generated with individual cth1 gRNAs also show the similar results, ruling out non-specific gRNA effects (Fig. S3C). Further examination revealed substantial defects in gamete development. Mutant oocytes were translucent white and frequently ruptured, in stark contrast to the intact, pale-yellow wild-type oocytes (Fig. 3F). Similarly, sperm from cth1 mutant males exhibited abnormal morphology, characterized by rough or degraded heads and various tail abnormalities (short, absent, bifurcated, or serrated tails), rendering them incapable of fertilizing wild-type eggs (Fig. 3G).

These results demonstrate that while zygotic cth1 expression product is not critical for early embryogenesis, it plays a crucial role in fertility through the regulation of both oogenesis and spermatogenesis. The severe infertility phenotype highlights the necessity for alternative methods, such as conditional or temporal knockdown, to explore the functional role of cth1 during early embryonic development.

Cas13d-mediated knockdown reveals the essential role of cth1 during the maternal-to-zygotic transition

Given that cth1 germline mutants result in infertility and cannot be utilized to investigate early developmental roles (Fig. 3), we employed the RfxCas13d to transiently knock down cth1 mRNA during embryogenesis (Hernandez-Huertas et al, 2022; Kushawah et al, 2020). Three independent gRNAs targeting cth1 were designed and injected individually with Cas13d mRNA into one-cell stage embryos (Fig. 4A). The qRT-PCR confirmed effective knockdown at 4 hpf, revealing significant reductions in cth1 mRNA levels across all guides as compared to controls by at least 75% (p-value ≤ 0.02, Cas13d alone vs Cas13d and g3CTH1, t. test) (Fig. 4B). Phenotypic analyses demonstrated that embryos co-injected with Cas13d mRNA and any of the three individual gRNAs consistently exhibited developmental defects at both 6, 8 and 24 hpf (p-value ≤ 0.015, chi-square test) (Fig. 4C, S4A-C). These defects included delayed epiboly, abnormal axis elongation, and morphological abnormalities (Fig. 4C, S4A-C). Importantly, embryos injected only with Cas13d mRNA or with individual gRNAs alone did not display any of these developmental defects (Fig. 4C, S4A-C) (Hernandez-Huertas et al, 2022; Hernandez-Huertas et al, 2025; Kushawah et al, 2020; Moreno-Sanchez et al, 2025). The reproducibility of the developmental phenotypes across three independent gRNAs illustrates the specificity of the effects and minimizes the likelihood they arise through off-target effects. Collectively, these results indicate that maternal cth1 is essential for embryogenesis (Figs. 4C, S4A-C), and comparison to cth1 Cas9 mutants suggests that the early phenotype is primarily driven by maternally deposited cth1 RNA rather than zygotic expression (Fig. S4D).

Figure 4. Cas13d-mediated knockdown reveals the essential role of cth1 during the maternal-to-zygotic transition.

Figure 4.

A. Schematic illustration showing that RfxCas13d mRNA and/or three individual cth1 gRNAs (g1CTH1, g2CTH1, g3CTH1) were injected into 1 cell stage embryo and qRT-PCR was performed at 4 hpf to test the target efficacy followed by imaging at 6 hpf and 1 dpf to observe embryonic development.

B. Bar-plot showing cth1 RNA levels upon CRISPR-RfxCas13d mediated knockdown for three independent gRNAs (g1CTH1, g2CTH1, g3CTH1) at 4 hpf measured by qRT-PCR. All the gRNAs show significant level of cth1 mRNA knockdowns, (p-value ≤ 0.02 (g3CTH1), t. test).

C. Representative images of embryos at 6 hpf and 1dpf. Embryos were co-injected with RfxCas13d and either of the guideRNAs targeting cth1 displayed developmental abnormalities while injection of either RfxCas13d or guideRNA alone display normal embryonic development. Scale bar, 200 μm.

D. Representative 1 dpf zebrafish images showing that injection of mRNA encoding for cth1 with control 5’ and 3’UTRs affected development while injection of cth1 mRNA with its endogenous 3’UTR does not affect development compared to embryos injected with mRNA encoding for GFP. Scale bar 5mm.

E. Schematic illustration of RfxCas13d mediated RNA knockdown phenotype rescue assay in zebrafish. The CDS of endogenous cth1 is targeted with a single g2CTH1 and RfxCas13d mRNA. For rescue experiment, ectopic cth1 mRNAs containing 8 synonymous mutations in the gRNA target site (m*cth1(synMut) RNA) and containing cth1 3’UTR should rescue the cth1 knockdown phenotype. While ectopic expression of GFP should not rescue the developmental knockdown phenotype.

F. Representative images showing the developmental phenotype associated with cth1 knockdown (RfxCas13d + gORF), interestingly, the phenotype was rescued by ectopic expression of cth1 insensitive to the guideRNA (RfxCas13d + gORF + m*cth1(synMut)) but not by the ectopic expression of GFP (RfxCas13d + gORF + mGFP). Injection of RfxCas13d alone or RfxCas13d + gORF and m*cth1(synMut) mRNAs did not affect development. Images are of 28 hpf embryos, scale bar, 1mm.

G. Stack bar plot showing the percentage of observed phenotype in the cth1 rescue experiment at 1 dpf. Different intensities of gray color are positively associated with the severity of the phenotype (dark, most severe phenotype (class III) and white, (wildtype)). n represents the number of embryos observed in each condition.

To further validate the functional specificity of the phenotypes, we performed rescue experiments. As a first step, we tested whether ectopic expression of cth1 mRNA could perturb development. Injection of cth1 fused to the control 3′UTR caused dose-dependent developmental defects and do not show marginal enrichment of RNA (Figs. 4D, S4E-G), whereas injection of cth1 mRNA containing its native 3′UTR, which directs proper marginal localization (Fig. 2) did not show developmental defects (Fig. 4D and S4F). These findings highlight the importance of spatially regulated cth1 expression during embryogenesis and demonstrate a need for preserving the native 3′UTR of cth1 in rescue experiments.

Accordingly, we generated an exogenous cth1 mRNA construct containing eight synonymous mutations resistant to a Cas13d gRNA (Fig. 4E). Co-injection of Cas13d, cth1-targeting gRNAs, and the resistant cth1 construct harboring its native 3′UTR successfully rescued the knockdown developmental defects (p-value = 5.5e-4, Cas13d KD vs rescue 24 hpf, p-value = 2.4e-3, Cas13d KD vs rescue 6 hpf) (Figs. 4E-G, S4H - I). As control, GFP mRNA did not rescue the cth1 phenotype and injection of cth1 with its native 3′UTR alone did not affect development although both transcripts were efficiently translated (Figs. 4E-G, S4H-J). Moreover, cth1 fused to a control 3′UTR failed to rescue the knockdown phenotypes even with minimal concentration (5pg/embryo) (Figs. S4K-M), highlighting the criticalness of spatial distribution of Cth1 mRNA during gastrulation. Together, these results demonstrate that the phenotype observed upon cth1 depletion are specific and biological relevant and that more generally Cas13d-mediated knockdown is an effective approach to study maternal genes essential for fertility and early development.

Cth1 regulates maternal mRNA stability during the maternal-to-zygotic transition independently of zygotic factors

Given that orthologs of Cth1 in other vertebrates’ function as RNA-binding proteins modulating mRNA stability (Ball et al, 2014; Cicchetto et al, 2023), we hypothesized that zebrafish CTH1 similarly regulates maternal mRNA clearance during the MZT. To test this, we performed RNA-seq on embryos subjected to cth1 knockdown using Cas13d and two independent gRNAs (g1 and g2) at 4 hpf, a stage at which no evident developmental phenotypes were observed in cth1 knockdown embryos (Fig. 5A). Both showed robust target efficiency (Fig. 4B), and reproducible phenotypes (Figs. 4C, S4A) that were rescued with exogenous cth1 (Figs. 4E-G, S4H-I). RNA-seq profiles from embryos injected with cth1-targeting guides were compared to those from embryos injected with Cas13d alone at 2, and 4 hpf (Fig. 5B-C, S5A-B). Both gRNAs effectively reduced cth1 mRNA levels across 2 and 4 hpf (2 hpf = log2 fold change < −0.9-fold reduction and adjusted p value ≤ 0.16, 4 hpf = log fold change < −1.95-fold reduction and adjusted p value ≤ 2.1 e-4) (Figs. 5B-C, S5A-B).

Figure 5. Cth1 regulates mRNA stability during the MZT via 3′UTR cis elements.

Figure 5.

A. Schematic illustration showing that RfxCas13d mRNA was injected alone or with either gRNAs g1CTH1 or g2CTH1 at 1 cell stage zebrafish embryos and RNA-seq was performed at 2 and 4 hpi.

B. Volcano plots showing the mRNA fold change in embryos co-injected with RfxCas13d and g2CTH1 compared to embryos injected with RfxCas13d alone at 2 (B) and 4 (C) hpf. Cth1 was efficiently knockdown (red), and no off targets were identified allowing up to 4 mismatches between g2CTH1 sequence and the target sequences are shown by purple dots.

D. Scatter plot showing the fold change of mRNA between the embryos co-injected with RfxCas13d and the indicated guideRNAs compared to the embryos injected with RfxCas13d alone. Cth1 was effectively knockdown with both guideRNAs (Red), mRNAs significantly upregulated in both knockdown is shown in blue (putative Cth1 targets) and 4 random groups of 500 nonsignificant regulated gene as shown in pink color shades were selected as control genes (C1- C4). Strong positive correlation between the two-knockdowns ruling out off target effects (R = 0.95).

E. Sina plot showing the relative poly(A) tail status, the log2 fold change between poly(A) RNA to ribosomal-depleted RNA, of the putative Cth1 targets and control groups (C1-C4) at different time points. Putative Cth1 targets exhibit extended poly(A) tail relative to control groups (C1-C4) immediately after fertilization (0 hpf) but progressively relative loss of poly(A) tail length over time during maternal zygotic transition.

F. Cumulative plot showing the PolyA RNA-seq fold change between 5 and 2 hpf. The putative Cth1 targets (Blue) are unstable as compared to control groups (C1-C4, pink color). Wilcoxon rank-sum test, P value ≤ 2.3e-31.

G. Volcano plots showing the mRNA fold change in α-amanitin treated embryos co-injected with RfxCas13d and g2CTH1 guideRNAs compared to embryos injected with RfxCas13d alone at 4 hpf. Cth1 was efficiently knockdown (red), and no off targets were identified allowing up to 4 mismatches between g2CTH1 sequence and the target sequences are shown by purple dots which is suggesting cth1 mRNA specific knockdowns even in α-amanitin treated embryos.

H. Scatter plot showing the fold change of mRNA between the α-amanitin treated embryos injected with RfxCas13d and the indicated guideRNAs compared to the embryos injected with RfxCas13d alone. Cth1 was effectively knockdown with both guideRNAs (Red), the defined Cth1 targets (D) were again upregulated (Blue) and the defined control groups not upregulated (pink shades). Strong positive correlation between the two-knockdowns ruling out off target effects (R = 0.94).

I. Cumulative plot showing the PolyA RNA-seq plot fold change between 5 and 2 hpf from α-amanitin treated embryos. The putative Cth1 targets (Blue) are unstable as compared to control groups (C1-C4, pink color). Wilcoxon rank-sum test, P value ≤ 3.9e-71.

Knockdown of cth1 led to more upregulated than downregulated genes for each gRNA at both 2 and 4 hpf (Fig. S5C). The sets of upregulated genes showed strong and significant overlap between the two gRNAs at each time point (2 hpf g1 vs. g2: p value ≤ 0.2e-16; 4 hpf g1 vs. g2: p value ≤ 0.2e-16; Fisher’s Exact Test) (Fig. S5C), as well as across developmental time points within each knockdown (2 vs. 4 hpf: p value ≤ 0.2e-16; Fisher’s Exact Test) (Fig. S5C). This reproducibility across guides and time points underscores the specificity of the observed transcriptional changes. Moreover, the fold change values strongly correlate between each gRNA knockdown and the control embryos (4 hpf = Pearson correlation R=0.95, p value ≤ 2.2e-16) (Fig. 5D), suggesting that these genes are direct or indirect cth1 targets rather than off-target effects (Fig. 5D). This is also supported by our off-target analysis, where down regulated genes did not align to either gRNAs allowing up to 4 mismatches (shown in purple) (Figs. 5B-C, S5A-B). The significant overlap of upregulated mRNAs at 2 and 4 hpf (Fig. S5C), together with the observation that many changes were already evident by 2 hpf, indicates that cth1 exerts a rapid maternal effect.

To define high confidence potential cth1 targets, we selected genes upregulated in both knockdown conditions (fold change ≥ 0.5 and p value ≤ 0.05, putative cth1 targets (Targets)) and as controls, we generated four randomly sampled groups of 500 genes (C1-C4, shown in different shades of pink) from the transcriptome that were not significantly changed with either of the gRNAs targeting cth1 (Fig. 5D). High-confidence targets group (Targets) displayed elevated poly(A)-tail status at 0 hpf relative to control groups, suggesting these mRNAs are maternally deposited with extended poly(A) tails (Fig. 5E). During the MZT, these mRNAs (Targets) underwent progressive poly(A) shortening (Fig. 5E) and reduced expression compared to controls (C1-C4) at respective time points (Fig. 5F and S5D-E), indicative of active deadenylation and degradation processes.

Since cth1 is maternally supplied (Fig. 1), its decay is zygotic transcription-independent (Fig. 1D) and the observation that targets were affected before zygotic genome activation (Figs. 5B, S5A) suggests that cth1 mediated mRNA decay is governed solely by maternal factors (maternal program). To validate this, we repeated cth1 knockdown using Cas13d in embryos co-injected with α-amanitin to block zygotic transcription. cth1 knockdown was effective under these conditions (fold change ≥ 0.5 and p value ≤ 0.05) (Fig. 5G, S5F) and potential cth1 targets continued to display significant upregulation compared to controls (Fig. 5H). These results confirm that cth1 mediated mRNA degradation is independent of zygotic transcription. Further analysis of RNA-seq time-courses from embryos injected with α-amanitin revealed a consistent and progressive decay of cth1 target mRNAs, reinforcing the conclusion that their regulation is maternally governed and independent of zygotic transcriptional activity (Figs. 5I and S5G).

This application of CRISPR-Cas13d combined with α-amanitin treatment provides a unique method for accurately assessing maternal mRNA stability independent of zygotic transcriptional activity. Collectively, our findings strongly support a model wherein cth1 functions within a purely maternal regulatory program, directly or indirectly governing maternal mRNA stability during the MZT.

Cth1 regulates mRNA stability during the MZT via 3′UTR cis elements

To determine whether cth1 regulates its targets through elements within their 3′UTRs, we searched for cis-regulatory motifs enriched in these regions. As candidate targets, we again used our selected genes (Fig. 5D) that were significantly upregulated by both individual cth1-targeting gRNAs at 4 hpf compared to embryos injected with Cas13d alone. As controls, we also used our four independent sets of 500 genes randomly sampled mRNAs which were not significantly upregulated in either knockdown condition (Fig. 5D). Candidate targets did not differ significantly from controls in 3′UTR lengths (p value ≥ 0.56, Fig. S6A), ruling out sequence length as a confounding factor for motif analysis.

Among the top enriched 8-mers and 7-mers in the 3′UTR of the potential cth1 targets compared to the control groups (Figs. 6A and S6B), the 8-mers AAUAAAUA was present in 131 (29%) and AAUAAUAA in 66 (15%) of the 444 candidate target genes (Fig. 6B). The respective 7-mers, AUAAAUA and AUAAUAA, were found in 110 (25%) and 44 (10%) of the same group (Fig. 6B). Altogether, more than 71% of candidate targets contained at least one of these two seed motifs (AUAAAUA and AUAAUAA), whereas fewer than 37% of all analyzed genes carried any of them, representing nearly a two-fold enrichment (Fig. 6B).

Figure 6. Cth1 acts on the AU - rich 3′UTR of its targets.

Figure 6.

A. Scatter plot showing 8-mer motifs that are enriched in the putative Cth1 target group compared to the 4 control groups (C1-C4). AU-rich motifs are particularly overrepresented, with sequences containing “AAA” and “AA” showing the strongest enrichment.

B. Percentage of the 7-mer and 8-mer motifs containing “AAA” and “AA” one or more times in the putative Cth1 target and all the genes. The putative Cth1 target group genes with enriched motifs with these combinations constitute more than 70% of total genes, while in all the genes constitution is 37%.

C. Cumulative plot showing fold change between PolyA RNA-seq at 5 and 2 hpf. Transcripts containing enriched 7-mers/8-mers, particularly those with “AAA” and multiple motifs, exhibit greater destabilization than other genes. Wilcoxon rank-sum test, P values indicated.

D. Cumulative plot showing fold change between PolyA RNA-seq plot from α-amanitin treated embryos at 5 and 2 hpf. Transcripts containing enriched 7-mers/8-mers, especially those with “AAA” and multiple motifs, exhibit greater instability than other genes. Wilcoxon rank-sum test, P values indicated.

E. Cumulative plot showing the fold change between in PolyA RNA-seq upon cth1 knockdown mediated by g2CTH1 at 4 and 2 hpf. Transcripts containing enriched 7-mers/8-mers, especially those with “AAA” and multiple motifs, exhibit more stability than other genes. Wilcoxon rank-sum test, P values indicated.

F. Cumulative plot showing the fold change between fraction in PolyA RNA-seq plot upon cth1 knockdown mediated by g2CTH1 in α-amanitin treated embryos at 4 and 2 hpf. Transcripts with “AAA” and multiple motifs remain more stable than other genes. Wilcoxon rank-sum test, P values indicated.

G. Cumulative distribution plot of poly(A) status, as the log2 fold change between poly(A)-selected and ribo-depleted RNA-seq, upon cth1 knockdown by g1Cth1KD versus Cas13d control at 4 hpf. Transcripts containing enriched 7-mers/8-mers, especially those with “AAA” and multiple motifs, show significantly greater poly(A) tail enrichment relative to other genes. Wilcoxon rank sum test, number of genes (n) and p-values are indicated.

H. As in G, but in α-amanitin treated embryos using g1Cth1KD targeting cth1, confirming the reproducibility of the poly(A) tail enrichment observed for 7-mers/8-mers - containing transcripts upon cth1 knockdown at 4 hpf.

The AAUAAAUA motif showed a strong 3′-biased distribution within the 3′UTRs (P = 3.3e-3 (non-targets), Wilcoxon rank-sum test), with significant enrichment in the final 30 nucleotides (P = 7.8e-4; Wilcoxon rank-sum test) (Fig. S6C). In contrast, AAUAAUAA did not display a positionally biased distribution (Fig. S6C). RBP-scan (Kretov et al, 2026), a recently developed in vivo RNA-binding activity tool, independently identified AU-rich motifs interactions upon cth1 overexpression, supporting the presence of functional cis-elements recognized by Cth1 (Fig. S6D).

To evaluate whether the presence of these motifs was associated with mRNA instability during embryogenesis, we examined maternal mRNAs containing AAUAAAUA or AAUAAUAA motifs in their 3′UTRs. These genes displayed significantly greater degradation (5 vs. 2 hpf fold change) compared to mRNAs without these motifs, in both untreated (Figs. 6C, S6E-F) and α-amanitin–injected embryos (Figs. 6D, S6G-H). This suggests that motif-containing mRNAs are intrinsically unstable and degraded independent of zygotic transcription. Furthermore, these mRNAs containing the motifs were significantly upregulated in cth1 knockdowns (Figs. 6E-F, S6I-J), indicating they are cth1 targets (direct or indirect). 3′UTRs containing more than one motif showed stronger decay than those with a single motif during embryogenesis (Fig. 6C, S6E-F) and higher stabilization in cth1 knockdown (Fig. 6E-F, S6I-J), suggesting that stability of the 3′UTR is directly associated with motif numbers. In both untreated and α-amanitin–injected embryos, cth1 knockdown led to higher poly(A)-tail status on cth1 target mRNAs, with tail length scaling positively with both the number and length of motifs (Fig. 6G-H, S6K-L). This is consistent with the progressive poly(A) tail shortening of these transcripts observed during embryogenesis (Fig. 5E), a process that proceeds independently of zygotic transcription (Fig. S5D), and indicates that Cth1 is required for their deadenylation-mediated decay (Fig. 6G, 6H, S6K, S6L).

Cth1 recognizes conserved AU-rich motifs in target 3′UTRs to drive deadenylation-mediated decay

To directly test whether Cth1-mediated destabilization depends on the motifs we identified as enriched in its target 3′UTRs (Fig. 6), we cloned 3′UTRs from representative targets containing at least one AAUAAAUA site (irf5, lipia, ppdpfb, stx11a, and tmem243a) downstream of GFP. These were co-injected with a GFP-control 3′UTR and NanoLuc as internal controls into Cas13d-alone (control) and cth1 knockdown embryos (Cas13d and g1CTH1) (Fig. 7A). The qRT-PCR confirmed efficient cth1 knockdown and, interestingly, most GFP-3′UTR reporters containing the motifs were significantly stabilized in cth1 knockdown embryos at 6 hpf (p value ≤ 0.07, t. test) (Fig. 7B). Furthermore, the tmem243a 3′UTR, which contains two such motifs, showed the strongest effect (Fig. 7B) (p value ≤ 3.9e-07, t. test), reinforcing the influence of motif numbers (Fig. 6). The GFP-control 3′UTR control was unaffected (p value = 0.11, t. test), confirming specificity (Fig. 7B). Individual injection of GFP-3′UTR reporters containing these motifs also show higher GFP fluorescence levels upon cth1 knockdown as compared to wildtype embryos at 8 hpf (Figs. 7C, S7A-C) All these results suggest that cth1 promotes their decay via 3′UTR interactions.

Figure 7. Cth1 recognizes conserved AU-rich motifs in target 3′UTRs to drive deadenylation-mediated decay.

Figure 7.

A. Schematic of the GFP:3′UTR reporter assay in wild-type and RfxCas13d-mediated cth1 knockdown conditions followed by qRT-PCR at 6hpi. 3′UTRs of five candidates from putative Cth1 target group were cloned downstream of GFP, with injection controls including GFP: β-globin 3′UTR and NanoLuc mRNA (10 pg/embryo). This injection cocktail was injected into one-cell zebrafish embryos with or without g1CTH1 (600 pg/embryo) targeting cth1.

B. qRT-PCR analysis showing normalized RNA levels in embryos injected with a cocktail of GFP:3′UTRs mRNAs, NanoLuc as control and RfxCas13d, with or without g1CTH1 at 6 hpf. Endogenous cth1 transcripts were reduced while GFP: β-globin 3′UTR control remained unchanged and GFP:3′UTRs of all candidate targets were upregulated upon cth1 knockdown. Data represent ≥3 biological replicates from two independent experiments; significance was determined by t-test (p < 0.05).

C. Pictures showing the GFP expression from a mRNA encoding for GFP containing the 3′UTR for tmem243a reporter co-injected with RfxCas13d and g1CTH1 (KD) or in wildtype conditions, at 8 hpi. TagRFP was co-injected as a control. Bar plot showing the normalized GFP quantification in wildtype and cth1 knockdown conditions. “n” number of embryo calculated, and significance was determined by t-test (p < 0.05).

D. Schematic of the GFP:3′UTR reporter assay comparing reporters containing 3′UTR with intact endogenous motifs versus motif-deleted versions in wild-type and RfxCas13d-mediated cth1 knockdown embryos at 8 hpf. Each reporter was injected individually along with TagRFP as injection control at the one-cell stage.

E. Pictures showing the GFP expression from a mRNAs encoding for GFP containing the 3′UTR for tmem243a (wildtype) or lacking the proposed CTH1 motif reporters co-injected with RfxCas13d and g1CTH1 (KD) or in wildtype conditions, at 8 hpi. TagRFP was co-injected as a control.

F. Bar plot showing the normalized GFP quantification for 3′UTR for tmem243a (wildtype) and lacking the proposed CTH1 motif reporters in wildtype and cth1 knockdown conditions. “n” number of embryo calculated, and significance was determined by t-test (p < 0.05, p < 0.01).

G. ALFA tag RNA immunoprecipitation (RIP) followed by RT-PCR to assess binding of Cth1 to the tmem243a 3′UTR. Input samples (1:100 dilution) confirm the presence of RNA across all conditions. Strong and specific enrichment of the tmem243a 3′UTR is detected in pull-downs from Cth1–ALFA tag–injected embryos, but not from GFP–ALFA tag control embryos, suggesting direct association of Cth1 with this target mRNA. Co-injected tagRFP mRNA serves as an injection and specificity control; it is detectable in input fractions but absent from pull-down fractions, confirming the selectivity of the enrichment.

H. RT-PCR analysis of poly(A)-tail length assay for GFP reporters containing either the wild-type TMEM243A 3′UTR or a mutant version lacking the Cth1 binding motifs at 4 hpi. The wild-type reporter shows a shorter PCR product than the mutant, consistent with Cth1-dependent deadenylation. NT: No template control; WT: wild-type 3′UTR reporter; Mut: mutant 3′UTR reporter lacking Cth1 binding motifs.

I. HCR analysis of endogenous cth1 and tmem243a mRNA expression in wild-type and cth1 knock-down (Cth1 KD) zebrafish embryos at 5 hpf. In wild-type embryos, cth1 mRNA (Magenta) is enriched at the embryonic margin, while tmem243a mRNA (Green) is lowly expressed. Upon cth1 knockdown, tmem243a mRNA (Green) exhibits markedly enhanced marginal localization, suggesting that Cth1 restricts the marginal enrichment of tmem243a transcripts. No-probe embryos were included as negative controls to confirm signal specificity. Cyan: DAPI (Nuclei), rightmost panel: Composite images, Scale bar, 200 μm.

To assess the requirement of these motifs within the 3′UTRs, we generated deletion constructs lacking AAUAAAUA motifs for tmem243a 3′UTR. These mutant reporters were individually co-injected with TagRFP as an internal control into Cas13d-alone and cth1 knockdown embryos (Fig. 7E). In all cases, GFP expression from mutant-motifs (deleted version) 3′UTRs was increased compared to endogenous versions (wildtype), (Fig. 7E-F), confirming that motif and cth1 both are required for mRNA destabilization.

To assess whether Cth1 physically interact with its targets, we performed RNA immunoprecipitation followed by RT-PCR (RIP–RT-PCR) using an antibody against tagged Cth1. This confirmed a direct interaction between Cth1 and tmem243a mRNA (Fig. 7G). To then test whether this interaction drives deadenylation through the identified motifs, we performed poly(A) tail assays on wild-type and motif-deleted tmem243a 3′UTR reporters. These experiments revealed that Cth1-mediated poly(A) shortening is motif-dependent (Figs. 7H, S7D), directly linking motif recognition to the deadenylation. Finally, HCR analysis in cth1 knockdown embryos revealed preferential accumulation of tmem243a and lipia mRNAs at the embryonic margin during gastrulation (Figs. 7I, S7E), indicating that Cth1 accumulation in the marginal (Fig. 2) prevent the accumulation of these transcripts in this region. In summary, our results identify Cth1 as a key maternal decay factor that drives deadenylation-mediated clearance of its targets through conserved cis-regulatory elements in their 3′UTRs, thereby establishing the spatiotemporal pattern of maternal mRNA decay during embryogenesis.

Discussion

Our study demonstrates that differential gene expression during early development can result not only from transcriptional activity but also from spatially and temporally regulated mRNA decay. Cth1 emerges as the first maternal RNA decay factor in zebrafish with spatially restricted accumulation outside of germline contexts. Its high maternal abundance, rapid degradation, and 3′UTR-dependent marginal localization (Figs. 1, 2 and 7) underscore a novel layer of post-transcriptional control shaping the embryonic transcriptome.

The marginal enrichment of cth1 is most consistent with spatially regulated degradation rather than localized transcription or directed mRNA transport. Injection of reporter mRNAs containing the cth1 3′UTR confirmed that this localization is encoded within the 3′UTR sequence (Fig. 2). Interestingly, the GFP signal was also mainly coming from the marginal region, suggesting that the endogenous Cth1 protein might also accumulate and function in the marginal region (Fig. 2C), which is supported with the spatio-temporal mis regulation of the Cth1 targets (Fig. 7I). Massively parallel reporter analysis of the cth1 3′UTR identified three unstable regions that localize the mRNA to marginal region, suggesting that overlapping cis-regulatory elements and/or region-specific trans-acting factors may protect these sequences from decay (Fig. 2). The evolutionary conservation of these motifs (Fig. 2H) suggests selective pressure to preserve this mechanism and a valuable entry point for identifying analogous regulatory elements in other maternal mRNAs in the future. Our findings challenge aspects of traditional transcriptional models by demonstrating that vertebrate maternal RNAs can be spatially patterned through differential degradation outside the germ layer context. In Drosophila germ cells, Oskar protects nanos mRNA from Smaug-mediated deadenylation, allowing spatially restricted nanos mRNA stabilization and translation(Pamula & Lehmann, 2024; Semotok et al, 2005; Siddiqui et al, 2024; Tadros et al, 2007; Zaessinger et al, 2006). However, such trans-acting factors mediating cth1 spatio-temporal regulation remain unknown. A direct or indirect autoregulatory role of Cth1 can be part of the mechanism as shown for its orthologous in yeast (Martinez-Pastor et al, 2013). Identifying RNA-binding proteins or cofactors that interact with the cth1 3′UTR triggering its decay and/or protecting it from degradation may reveal additional components of a broader spatiotemporal decay network.

The discovery of cth1 decay-mediated localization raises the possibility that additional mRNAs may be spatio-temporally localized at the marginal region of the embryo or in other regions through selective degradation. The high abundance of cth1 may have facilitated its identification, suggesting it is merely the visible tip of a broader regulatory network. Future spatially resolved approaches, such as single-cell RNA-seq, whole-embryos imaging platform, SLAM-seq, and injection of massive reporter libraries will be instrumental in uncovering additional maternal mRNAs regulated by spatially restricted decay (Bhat et al, 2023; Fishman et al, 2024; Rabani et al, 2018). These technologies offer single-cell and transcript-level resolution, enabling the discovery of new maternal regulators. As shown recently, using single cell SLAM-seq in zebrafish, different mRNAs follow differential cell specific decay rate and patterns associated with specific sequence elements (Fishman et al, 2024). This study also identified cth1 as a rapidly decaying maternal RNA and suggested that zygotic cth1 transcripts may contribute to development (Fishman et al, 2024). However, our data support a predominant maternal role for cth1 during embryogenesis (Figs. 3 and 4) but does not exclude a potential zygotic contribution, which will require further detailed investigation.

Here, we applied for the first time a dual CRISPR strategy, Cas9 and Cas13d, to dissect maternal versus zygotic gene functions during vertebrate embryogenesis. Cas9-based mutagenesis did not result in early developmental defects (Fig. 3), suggesting that zygotic cth1 is dispensable at early developmental stages. Although cth1 mutants generated by Cas9 apparently develop normally but exhibit severe fertility defects later in life due to impaired gametogenesis (Figs. 3 and7). Similar phenotypes have been reported for Cth1 orthologs in other species (Ball et al, 2014; Ramos, 2012; Zhou et al, 2023) which hinders the functional investigation of these orthologs during early embryonic development (Ramos et al, 2004; Sha et al, 2018), though these have been implicated in female fertility. Our results suggest that Cth1 function extends to both male and female gametogenesis in zebrafish (Figs. 3 and 7). Detailed analysis of these mutant fish revealed that Cth1 is required for early meiotic progression and is essential for gametogenesis and fertility in both male and female zebrafish (Kushawah et al, 2026). This positions zebrafish as a powerful model to investigate Cth1-related infertility and other potential developmental roles. Although this infertility phenotype prevents the use of loss-of-function mutants to assess maternal function during embryogenesis. This limitation was overcome by using Cas13d-mediated knockdown, which enabled targeted depletion of maternal mRNAs and assessment of their developmental roles (Figs. 4, 5, 6 and 7). Moreover, we combined Cas13d with α-amanitin treatment, providing a new approach to test maternal mRNA stability independent of zygotic transcription. Furthermore, while collateral activity has been reported for Cas13d in mammalian systems (Ai et al, 2022; Kelley et al, 2022; Li et al, 2023; Shi et al, 2023), there is no evidence to suggest this occurs in zebrafish embryos injected with RfxCas13d protein or mRNA and gRNA targeting endogenous mRNAs (Cheng et al, 2022; Hernandez-Huertas et al, 2025; Kushawah et al, 2020; Moreno-Sanchez et al, 2025; Shangguan et al, 2024; Treichel & Bazzini, 2022; Treichel et al, 2026; Zhou et al, 2020). The use of two independent gRNAs (Fig. 4), rescue of the phenotypes by ectopic expression of cth1 (Fig. 4), and the overlap of differentially expressed mRNAs across gRNAs (Fig. 5) collectively confirm the specificity of the Cas13d approach used in our experiments (Fig. 5). The different developmental outcomes observed with ectopic cth1 expression from heterologous (control) versus endogenous 3′UTRs (Fig. 4) underscore the importance of spatial regulation of decay factors themselves during embryogenesis. Altogether, the spatiotemporal regulation of cth1, its marginal localization, mRNA decay activity, and associated phenotypes, suggests that Cth1 may influence mesodermal patterning and regulation of cells/tissues derived from mesodermal cell lineage differentiation during development. Defining how this mode of regulation shapes lineage specification, cell-fate decisions, and proper morphogenesis during gastrulation will be an important direction for future work.

Our knockdown experiments revealed widespread transcript upregulation detectable before ZGA as well as in α-amanitin–treated embryos, establishing that Cth1 operates within the maternal program, independent of zygotic expression (Figs. 1 and 5). Cth1 is a maternal RNA decay factor part of the maternal program in zebrafish. Mechanistically, Cth1 promotes deadenylation and decay analogous to as other factors (Cicchetto et al, 2023; Lai et al, 2003), by recognizing AU-rich motifs (8-mers and 7-mers) in target 3′UTRs (Fig. 6 and 7). One of these motifs partially overlap with the poly(A)-tail signal (Gallicchio et al, 2023; Levitt et al, 1989; Ulitsky et al, 2012). mRNAs bearing these motifs are maternally deposited with extended poly(A) tails (Fig. 5) yet are preferentially destabilized during the MZT (Figs. 5, 6 and 7), with decay strength increasing with motif copy number (Figs. 6 - 7). AU-rich binding is independently supported by high-throughput reporter assays (RBP-scan; (Kretov et al, 2026)), prior iCLIP data showing CTH1 preference for 3′UTRs (Vejnar et al, 2019) and our RIP–RT-PCR demonstrating motif-dependent pulldown of target mRNA by (Fig. 7G). Deleting these motifs in 3′UTR reporters attenuated its deadenylation, decay as well as response to cth1, confirming their necessity for Cth1-dependent destabilization (Fig. 7). Consistent with this, massively parallel reporter works have previously linked AU-enriched sequences to mRNA instability during the MZT (Rabani et al, 2018; Vejnar et al, 2019). Finally, in cth1 knockdown embryos we observed accumulation of Cth1 targets at the embryonic margin, indicating that marginal Cth1 enrichment (Fig. 2) normally restricts these transcripts from this region. The ectopic reporters did not display the same spatial pattern, which we hypothesize may reflect saturation of the Cth1-mediated decay system by the injected mRNA, or insufficient spatial resolution of the reporter assay to detect subtle marginal differences. Our observation of Cth1 enrichment in the marginal region raises the possibility that Cth1 protein levels may be controlled by spatially restricted mechanisms. In C. elegans, a conceptually similar mechanism regulates the stability of CCCH zinc-finger proteins during early embryogenesis (DeRenzo et al, 2003; Gallo et al, 2008; Oldenbroek et al, 2012; Schubert et al, 2000). The germline determinant PIE-1 is degraded in somatic blastomeres through ZIF-1-mediated ubiquitin-dependent proteolysis, while remaining stable in the germline lineage (DeRenzo et al, 2003; Oldenbroek et al, 2012; Schwartz et al, 2023). This spatially restricted turnover contributes to the segregation of somatic and germline fates. Although PIE-1 and Cth1 may not be direct functional equivalents, this example illustrates how zinc-finger proteins can be regulated at the level of protein stability in a cell-type-specific manner. By analogy, Cth1 localization in the marginal region may reflect a regulated stability mechanism, although this possibility requires direct experimental validation (DeRenzo et al, 2003; Oldenbroek et al, 2012; Schwartz et al, 2023).

This work opens new areas of investigation. (1) How many additional genes are regulated in a spatiotemporal manner through differential RNA stability (Kushawah et al, 2024)? (2) Which trans-acting factors recognize cis-elements and mediate localized decay of cth1? (3) How is Cth1 protein distributed across the embryo, and more broadly, might its activity, rather than abundance, be controlled by spatially restricted post-translational modifications?

In summary, this study identifies Cth1 as an RNA decay factor in the maternal program of zebrafish embryogenesis and first mRNA shown to be spatio-temporally distributed outside the germline. Our findings provide the first direct evidence that spatio-temporally regulated mRNA decay, outside the germline’s context, contributes to early development regulation during the MZT, establishing that RNA clearance, like transcription, can determine mRNA distribution in both spatial and temporal dimensions. While such regulatory logic likely operates during other cellular transitions, its effects may be technically easier to identify during early embryogenesis, when the transcriptome is dominated by maternally deposited mRNAs and different cell lineages are being established during gastrulation. These insights redefine our understanding of spatial gene regulation and offer a powerful conceptual and experimental framework for dissecting post-transcriptional gene regulation in vivo in a spatio-temporal manner.

Methods

Zebrafish maintenance, embryo productions and experimentations

All zebrafish (Danio rerio) experiments were performed in accordance with protocols approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) at the Stowers Institute. Adult zebrafish from the AB, TU, TF, and TLF strains, aged between 6 to 18 months, were used for embryo production. Fish were randomly selected from a colony of approximately 500 individuals, consisting of four independent strains. For microinjections, at least 12 male and 12 female zebrafish were randomly bred to get fertilized timed one cell stage embryos. Embryos were maintained in zebrafish embryo media at 28.5°C under standard laboratory conditions.

Zebrafish microinjections

All the experiments were done by injecting one cell stage dechorionated zebrafish embryos. All the injected controls and experiment embryos were grown at 28.5°C using E2 zebrafish embryo media with 0.01% methylene blue. For RfxCas13d-mediated knockdown experiments, 300 pg of RfxCas13d mRNA (Addgene plasmid # 141320) was injected per embryo (Kushawah et al, 2020). Guide RNA (gRNA) concentrations for Cas13d knockdowns ranged from 400–600 pg. Cth1 gRNAs were ordered from synthego. For Cas9 mutagenesis, 100pg of Cas9 mRNA (Addgene plasmid # 46757) and 25pg of each gRNA were used per injection. All the injections were done at one cell stage embryo. Following microinjections, all embryos were treated in similar manner, frequent cleaning, and incubated at 28.5 degrees Celsius. At least 20 embryos for each replicate were collected for both qRT-PCR and RNA-seq. During this study, embryos were periodically cleaned and imaged at 4, 6, 8 hpf and at 1-day post-fertilization (dpf). For knockdown phenotype rescue experiments 20–25 pg of exogenous RNA was used. For α-amanitin experiments, 200 μl/ml α-amanitin was microinjected into one-cell-stage embryos. For 3′UTR reporter assays, 20pg RNA was injected for fluorescence imaging and 10 pg RNA for qRT-PCR analysis.

Hybridization Chain Reaction (HCR) for zebrafish embryos

Custom probes targeting cth1, tmem243a, lipia, GFP, and TagRFP transcripts, along with corresponding amplifiers and reagents for V3HCR, were obtained from Molecular Instruments. Hybridization was performed following the manufacturer’s zebrafish embryo protocol. On the second day, amplifiers conjugated to specific fluorophores were added during the amplification step and incubated overnight at room temperature in the dark. Embryos were subsequently washed and counterstained with DAPI prior to imaging.

RNA isolation and qRT- PCR

To further test the knockdown efficiency and find the molecular signatures of knockdowns, RNA was isolated using either the standard TRIzol method (ThermoFisher Scientific) or the Zymo-Research RNA Mini Kit (ZYMO RESEARCH, Cat. No. R1055). The concentration of the isolated RNA was measured using either a NanoDrop spectrophotometer or the Qubit RNA-Broad Range assay. For qRT-PCR analysis, complementary DNA (cDNA) was synthesized according to the manufacturer’s protocol using the SuperScript IV First-Strand Synthesis System (ThermoFisher Scientific, Cat. No. 18091050) and using different oligos mentioned in table (Table S1). Quantitative real-time PCR (RT-PCR) was then performed using the low ROX SYBR-Green dye (Quanta Bio, Cat. No. 95074–05K), gene-specific primers (20μM), and 1–2μl of cDNA diluted in a 25μl reaction volume, depending on the gene of interest and the developmental time point. The reactions were conducted on an automated Freedom EVO® PCR workstation (Tecan) using a predefined template program designed for the number of samples. For normalization, endogenous housekeeping genes such as cdk2ap2 or taf15 were used as reference genes for target gene expression analysis, while for reporter assays, other injection controls like TagRFP, and Nano Luciferase were utilized.

Knockdown phenotype rescue

Guide RNAs (gRNAs) were designed either to target the 3’UTR or the ORF of the cth1 (Table S1), following a previously published protocol (Hernandez-Huertas et al, 2022). For cth1 knockdown phenotype rescue experiments, a cth1 ORF containing eight synonymous mutations at the gRNA target site was cloned with its endogenous 3′UTR to generate a gRNA-resistant transcript (Table S2), enabling transcript expression without interference from ORF-targeting gRNAs. A GFP construct served as a negative control to account for ectopic overexpression effects.

In a complementary rescue strategy, the cth1 ORF was cloned with a heterologous (non-zebrafish) 3′UTR, thereby avoiding targeting by gRNAs directed against the endogenous cth1 3′UTR. As a control, a GFP construct carrying the same heterologous 3′UTR was used to control for both gRNA specificity and overexpression-related effects.

CRISPR-Cas9 mediated mutation in zebrafish

Three gRNAs were designed using CRISPR Scan guidelines using oligos in (Table S1). The Cas9 plasmid (Addgene # 179317) was digested using XbaI enzyme and capped in vitro transcription was performed using mMESSAGE mMACHINE™ T3 Transcription Kit to generate Cas9 mRNA (Vejnar et al, 2016). The gRNAs were synthesized according to the protocol outlined for the AmpliScribe-T7 Flash Kit. Zebrafish embryos at the one-cell stage were injected with either 100 pg of Cas9 mRNA and 25 pg of each of the three gRNAs in combination or with 25 pg of each gRNA separately. After injection all the embryos were processed and incubated similarly. Phenotypes of the injected embryos were observed and imaged at 6 hpf and 1 dpf. During this process individual embryos were collected at 24 hpf in QuickExtract™ DNA Extraction Solution (Lucigen) for Indel mutations genotyping using MiSeq2 × 250 flow cell. Sequencing and mutation rates were analyzed as described in genotyping protocol (Billmyre et al, 2023).

Scanning Electron Microscopy

Sperm samples were diluted onto coverslips coated with 4nm of gold palladium with a Leica EM Ace600 and prepared as previously described for preserving membranes (Korneev et al, 2021). After critical point drying with a Tousimis Samdri-795 and coated with an additional 4nm of gold palladium sperm were imaged at 300kV, 100pA with an SE2 detector on a Zeiss Merlin SEM. All the images were processed similarly in Fiji using CLAHE plugin.

Gamete collection from Zebrafish

Gametes were collected from wild-type and mutant zebrafish following institutional animal care and handling guidelines. For oocyte collection, females were paired with males overnight in tanks separated by a divider. The following morning, coinciding with light cycle activation, females were anesthetized in 4 g/L MS-222 and stripped to obtain mature oocytes. For sperm collection, males were anesthetized using the same procedure, placed ventral side up in a fish holder, and sperm was collected using a microcapillary pipette connected to an aspiration tube assembly.

Image acquisition

Different microscopes were used according to the requirement. For zebrafish embryos grouped pictures at early time point up to 1 dpf Leica stereo-fluorescent microscope with DFC900 camera. For individual representative images Leica MZ APO stereo microscope was used for bright field images. For HCR images Nikon spinning disc a confocal microscope was used at 10x and 20x magnification. For large adult fish Samsung galaxy s21 ultra camera was used. For sperm images Zeiss Merlin SEM with SE2 detector was used. For image processing Fiji software was used and image panels were made using adobe illustrator 2024.

RNA-seq libraries preparation and primary analysis

Total RNA was isolated form 20 embryos using Zymo-Research RNA Mini Kit (ZYMO RESEARCH, Cat. No. R1055) and RNA quality was measured with Bioanalyzer (Agilent). Only RNA with > 7.5 RIN were used for library preparation. For RNA-seq at least 500 ng of RNA was used for library preparation using reagents from Watchmaker Genomics, for total RNA- seq library preparation Watchmaker mRNA Library Prep Kit (Cat. No. 7BK0001) with xGen Stubby Adapter and UDI Primers (IDT, Cat. No. 1000592) were used. Samples were sequenced using paired reads on G4-F3 with a read length of 50bp or 75bp using a flow cell from Singular Genomics (Cat. No. 700125). For Ribosomal RNA depleted RNA-seq, Polaris depletion Kit rRNA/Globin (HMR) (Watchmaker Genomics, Cat. No. 7K0077) was used. Samples were run using AVITI 2×75 Sequencing Kit Cloud break FS High output freestyle flow cell (Element Biosciences, Cat. No. 860–00015). RNA-seq reads were demultiplexed into fastq format allowing up to one mismatch and Singular Genomics sgdemux (v 1.2.0) for samples sequenced on the G4-F3. Subsequently, the reads were aligned to GRCz11 reference genome from Ensembl using STAR (v 2.7.10b). The gene model retrieved from Ensembl, release 106 was used to generate gene read counts. The transcript abundance TPM (Transcript per Million) was quantified using RSEM (v 1.3.1).

Western blot

To assess protein expression of cth1–α-tagged mRNA used in rescue experiments, zebrafish embryos were injected at the one-cell stage with cth1–α-tagged mRNA (10 pg). GFP–α-tagged mRNA (10 pg) was used as a positive control. At 4 hpf, ~50 embryos per condition (in triplicate) were collected, lysed, and subjected to immunoblot analysis using an anti-α-tag antibody (Nanotag, Cat No: N1581). α-tubulin (Sigma-Aldrich, Cat No: T9026) was used as a loading control.

RNA immunoprecipitation (RIP) and RT–PCR

To identify Cth1-associated RNAs, zebrafish embryos at the one-cell stage were injected with cth1–α-tagged mRNA (20 pg) containing its endogenous 3′UTR. GFP–α-tagged mRNA (20 pg) was used as a control, and tagRFP mRNA (20 pg) was co-injected as an injection control. For each condition, ~300 embryos per replicate were collected at 4 hpf. Embryos were lysed and subjected to RNA immunoprecipitation using α-tag–specific pulldown (Nanotag: ALFA Selector ST Beads, Cat No. N1516-L), followed by standard washing steps according to the manufacturer’s instructions. A fraction of each lysate (1:100 dilution) was reserved as input. RNA was extracted from both input and pulldown fractions, followed by cDNA synthesis. Enrichment of endogenous Cth1 target transcripts was assessed by RT–PCR. tagRFP amplification was used as a control for injection and specificity.

Poly(A)-tail status analysis

To assess the polyadenylation status of transcripts, we compared gene expression between poly(A)-enriched and ribo-depleted RNA-seq libraries prepared from the same biological samples. TPM values were obtained from RSEM and averaged across replicates within each sample group. A poly(A) status score was computed for each gene as log2((TPM_polyA + 0.05) / (TPM_ribo + 0.05)), where the pseudo count of 0.05 prevents undefined values for unexpressed genes. Positive scores indicate efficient capture by poly(A) selection (polyadenylated transcripts), while negative scores indicate transcripts predominantly detected by ribo-depletion (non-polyadenylated). To compare poly(A) status changes across experimental conditions, we computed fold-changes in poly(A) status scores between treatment and control samples. Genes with zero TPM in both libraries for a given condition were excluded from downstream comparisons. Cumulative distribution functions (ECDFs) of poly(A) status fold-changes were compared between gene groups of interest and background genes using two-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests, with p-values adjusted for multiple comparisons using the Benjamini-Hochberg method.

Poly(A)-tail Assay

To assess polyadenylation status of the Cth1 target tmem243a, wild-type and mutant tmem243a mRNAs (20 pg) were injected into one-cell stage zebrafish embryos. Approximately 50 embryos per condition (in replicates) were collected at 4 hpf. Total RNA was isolated using TRIzol reagent according to the manufacturer’s instructions. An RNA adaptor was ligated to the 3′ end of the purified RNA, followed by cDNA synthesis using an oligo complementary to the adaptor sequence. cDNA was subsequently purified using a Zymo Clean & Concentrator kit. PCR amplification was performed to specifically detect injected tmem243a transcripts poly(A)-tail status using a forward primer targeting the injected RNA and a reverse primer complementary to the adaptor-derived sequence.

Construction and GFP:3′UTR reporter assay

To generate a GFP:3′UTR individual reporter, 3′UTRs of candidate targets identified from RNA-seq were amplified from cDNA prepared from 1 hpf zebrafish embryos using oligos in (Table S1). Amplified fragments were cloned downstream of GFP and sequence verified. Positive clones were digested with KpnI-HF, and capped RNAs were synthesized in vitro using the SP6 mMESSAGE mMACHINE Maxiscript kit. For qRT-PCR assays, an RNA cocktail was prepared containing six different GFP:3′UTR reporter transcripts (10 ng/μl each), GFP: β-globin 3′UTR, TagRFP (10 ng/μl), NanoLuc (10 ng/μl), and RfxCas13d mRNA (300 ng/μl). For cth1 knockdown, gRNA (600 ng/μl) targeting cth1 was co-injected with the cocktail. Embryos were collected at 6 hpf for RNA extraction, cDNA synthesis, and qRT-PCR. For fluorescence imaging, each GFP:3′UTR reporter was injected individually (20 ng/μl) with TagRFP control, and embryos were imaged at 8 hpf.

Construction of cth1 GFP:3′UTR reporter library

Cth1 3′UTR fragments of 50 nucleotides each with 2–5 nucleotides overlap with consecutive fragments along with fragments from miR-430 target sod1 genes as a positive control downstream to GFP reporter were ordered from IDT. The whole reporter and 3′UTR fragments cassette was flanked with illumina adaptors. Whole library was minimally PCR amplified (20 cycles) using a set of universal oligos, ran on agarose gel and desired size band was cut, gel extraction purification was done, and in vitro transcription was performed using the SP6 mMESSAGE mMACHINE Maxiscript kit. The library (15 pg/embryo) was injected at one cell stage embryo and 50 embryos each were collected in triplicate at 2 and 8 hpf for RNA isolation. RNA was poly(A) enriched using Dynabeads™ mRNA Purification Kit (Thermofisher, Cat No. 61006) and sequenced.

Data Analysis

Data analysis was carried out in R (version = 4.4.1) with packages from CRAN and Bioconductor. RNA-seq data were imported and filtered using tidyverse and data.table, retaining protein-coding genes with moderate expression (CPM >= 5 at 2hpf) and 3′UTRs between 100 and 800 nt. Differential expression results from RfxCas13d knockdowns were merged, and a putative cth1 target group was defined by requiring log2fold-changes ≥ 0.5 and adjusted P < 0.05 under both g1CTH1 and g2CTH1 conditions, while four control sets were generated by randomly sampling non-responsive genes (C1-C4). Gene-group assignments were visualized with scatter plots created using ggplot2 and ggpubr. Time-course expression data from ribosomal depletion, poly(A) selection and α-amanitin-treated libraries were log2-transformed and plotted (Medina-Munoz et al, 2021). Median expression was overlaid with cross-bars, and RNA-decay rates were estimated as log2 ratios of late to early timepoints. Differences between candidate and control groups were assessed with Wilcoxon rank-sum tests and visualized via boxplots and distribution curves. Transcript annotations, including coding sequence and UTR lengths, were retrieved from Ensembl via biomaRt. Sequences were manipulated with Biostrings. K-mer counts in candidate versus control 3′UTRs were calculated with an in-house script and compared using one-sided Fisher’s exact tests, with Benjamini–Hochberg correction; per-k-mer P-values were combined across control comparisons using Fisher’s combined probability test. Enriched motifs were illustrated with sequence logos, and their transcript positions were mapped back onto 3′UTRs. Distances from motifs to poly(A)-tails were calculated and plotted to infer positional bias. The source code for the analysis presented in this study is available from GitHub.

Quantification and Statistical analysis:

To select different sample sizes, no predefined statistical method was used. The experiments were not randomized, and investigators were not blinded to group allocation during the experiments or outcome assessment. All collected data were included in the analysis without exclusion. All the quantification, gene expression and RNA-Seq plots were generated in R. Phenotype quantification across different CRISPR-Cas-mediated injection conditions was analyzed using chi-squared (χ2) tests, performed using R. For quantitative RT-PCR analysis, knockdown rescue experiments, p-values were determined using an unpaired t-test, and error bars represent the Standard Error of the Mean (SEM) with statistical analysis performed on at least two biological replicates. P value for cumulative plots between different sets of genes was calculated using Wilcoxon rank-sum tests.

Lead Contact

Further information and resource request should be directed to lead contact Ariel A. Bazzini (arb@stowers.org).

Data and Code Availability

The Accession number for the RNA-Seq data used in this manuscript is GEO: GSE330436. All the relevant data is available upon request from the corresponding author.

Supplementary Material

Supplement 1

Figure 8. Functional analysis of cth1 during maternal-to-zygotic transition.

Figure 8.

A. Cth1 is among the most highly deposited maternal mRNAs and undergoes rapid, cell–specific degradation during the MZT. The cth1 3′UTR mediates mRNA stabilization in the marginal region of zebrafish embryos by 6 hpf. Knockdown of cth1 using CRISPR–Cas13d affects embryonic development and stabilizes maternal mRNA targets which have AU-rich 3′UTRs by preventing their deadenylation. In contrast, CRISPR–Cas9-generated cth1 mutants are infertile, underscoring an essential role for cth1 in both oogenesis and spermatogenesis. The Cas13d approach enabled functional interrogation of cth1 during embryogenesis, bypassing the embryonic lethality observed in Cas9 mutants.

Highlights.

  1. Cth1 is a highly deposited maternal mRNA that undergoes rapid decay

  2. 3’UTR of Cth1 drives its spatio-temporal dynamics.

  3. Cth1 is essential for gametogenesis and early embryonic development.

  4. CTH1 recognizes AU-rich elements in target 3′UTRs to trigger decay.

Acknowledgments

We thank Robb Krumlauf, Anthony Treichel, Ismael Moreno Sanchez, Miguel Moreno-Mateos for critical reading and valuable suggestions for this manuscript. Carrie Carmichael for zebrafish related discussion and training. Different core facilities at Stowers Institute like Sequencing and Discovery Genomics, genome engineering, automation and PCR technology, Media prep and all members of the Bazzini laboratory for their intellectual and technical support. This study was supported by the Stowers Institute for Medical Research. AAB was awarded a Pew Innovation Fund and with the US National Institutes of Health (NIH-R01 GM136849, NIH-R21 OD034161 and NIH-R35 GM161459). This work was performed as part of post-doctoral training for GK at the Stowers Institute for Medical Research. This work was performed as part of thesis research for D.B.A. at the Graduate School of the Stowers Institute for Medical Research. Original data underlying this manuscript can be accessed from the Stowers Original Data Repository at http://www.stowers.org/research/publications/libpb-2587.

Footnotes

Competing interests’ statement

The authors declare no competing non-financial interests.

Declaration of generative AI and AI-assisted technologies in the writing process

During the preparation of this work the authors used ChatGPT in order to improve only the text. After using this tool, the authors reviewed and edited the content as needed and take full responsibility for the content of the publication.

References

  • 1.Ai Y, Liang D, Wilusz JE (2022) CRISPR/Cas13 effectors have differing extents of off-target effects that limit their utility in eukaryotic cells. Nucleic Acids Res 50: e65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Audic Y, Omilli F, Osborne HB (1998) Embryo deadenylation element-dependent deadenylation is enhanced by a cis element containing AUU repeats. Mol Cell Biol 18: 6879–6884 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Baia Amaral D, Egidy R, Perera A, Bazzini AA (2024) miR-430 regulates zygotic mRNA during zebrafish embryogenesis. Genome Biol 25: 74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ball CB, Rodriguez KF, Stumpo DJ, Ribeiro-Neto F, Korach KS, Blackshear PJ, Birnbaumer L, Ramos SB (2014) The RNA-binding protein, ZFP36L2, influences ovulation and oocyte maturation. PLoS One 9: e97324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Baou M, Norton JD, Murphy JJ (2011) AU-rich RNA binding proteins in hematopoiesis and leukemogenesis. Blood 118: 5732–5740 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Barlit H, Romero AM, Gulhan A, Patnaik PK, Tyshkovskiy A, Martinez-Pastor MT, Gladyshev VN, Puig S, Labunskyy VM (2024) Ribosome profiling reveals the role of yeast RNA-binding proteins Cth1 and Cth2 in translational regulation. iScience 27: 109868. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Bazzini AA, Del Viso F, Moreno-Mateos MA, Johnstone TG, Vejnar CE, Qin Y, Yao J, Khokha MK, Giraldez AJ (2016) Codon identity regulates mRNA stability and translation efficiency during the maternal-to-zygotic transition. EMBO J 35: 2087–2103 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Bazzini AA, Lee MT, Giraldez AJ (2012) Ribosome profiling shows that miR-430 reduces translation before causing mRNA decay in zebrafish. Science 336: 233–237 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Bhat P, Cabrera-Quio LE, Herzog VA, Fasching N, Pauli A, Ameres SL (2023) SLAMseq resolves the kinetics of maternal and zygotic gene expression during early zebrafish embryogenesis. Cell Rep 42: 112070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Billmyre KK, Kesler EA, Tsuchiya D, Corbin TJ, Weaver K, Moran A, Yu Z, Adams L, Delventhal K, Durnin M, Davies OR, Hawley RS (2023) SYCP1 head-to-head assembly is required for chromosome synapsis in mouse meiosis. Sci Adv 9: eadi1562. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Brantley S, Di Talia S (2024) The maternal-to-zygotic transition. Curr Biol 34: R519–R523 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Bye AJH, Pugazhendhi D, Woodhouse S, Brien P, Watson R, Turner M, Pell J (2018) The RNA-binding proteins Zfp36l1 and Zfp36l2 act redundantly in myogenesis. Skelet Muscle 8: 37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Chang H, Yeo J, Kim JG, Kim H, Lim J, Lee M, Kim HH, Ohk J, Jeon HY, Lee H, Jung H, Kim KW, Kim VN (2018) Terminal Uridylyltransferases Execute Programmed Clearance of Maternal Transcriptome in Vertebrate Embryos. Molecular cell 70: 72–82 e77 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Cheng R, Zheng X, Wang Y, Ma X, Liu X, Xu W, Wang M, Gao Y, Xing X, Zhou C, Sun H, Guo Z, Quan F, Liu J, Hua S, Wang Y, Zhang Y, Liu X (2022) Modification of alternative splicing in bovine somatic cell nuclear transfer embryos using engineered CRISPR-Cas13d. Sci China Life Sci 65: 2257–2268 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Choi YJ, Lai WS, Fedic R, Stumpo DJ, Huang W, Li L, Perera L, Brewer BY, Wilson GM, Mason JM, Blackshear PJ (2014) The Drosophila Tis11 protein and its effects on mRNA expression in flies. J Biol Chem 289: 35042–35060 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Cicchetto AC, Jacobson EC, Sunshine H, Wilde BR, Krall AS, Jarrett KE, Sedgeman L, Turner M, Plath K, Iruela-Arispe ML, de Aguiar Vallim TQ, Christofk HR (2023) ZFP36-mediated mRNA decay regulates metabolism. Cell Rep 42: 112411. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Cook ME, Bradstreet TR, Webber AM, Kim J, Santeford A, Harris KM, Murphy MK, Tran J, Abdalla NM, Schwarzkopf EA, Greco SC, Halabi CM, Apte RS, Blackshear PJ, Edelson BT (2022) The ZFP36 family of RNA binding proteins regulates homeostatic and autoreactive T cell responses. Sci Immunol 7: eabo0981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.da Silva Pescador G, Baia Amaral D, Varberg JM, Zhang Y, Hao Y, Florens L, Bazzini AA (2024) Protein profiling of zebrafish embryos unmasks regulatory layers during early embryogenesis. Cell Reports 43 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Das S, Vera M, Gandin V, Singer RH, Tutucci E (2021) Intracellular mRNA transport and localized translation. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 22: 483–504 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.DeRenzo C, Reese KJ, Seydoux G (2003) Exclusion of germ plasm proteins from somatic lineages by cullin-dependent degradation. Nature 424: 685–689 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Fishman L, Modak A, Nechooshtan G, Razin T, Erhard F, Regev A, Farrell JA, Rabani M (2024) Cell-type-specific mRNA transcription and degradation kinetics in zebrafish embryogenesis from metabolically labeled single-cell RNA-seq. Nat Commun 15: 3104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Gallicchio L, Olivares GH, Berry CW, Fuller MT (2023) Regulation and function of alternative polyadenylation in development and differentiation. RNA Biol 20: 908–925 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Gallo CM, Munro E, Rasoloson D, Merritt C, Seydoux G (2008) Processing bodies and germ granules are distinct RNA granules that interact in C. elegans embryos. Dev Biol 323: 76–87 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Gavis ER, Lehmann R (1992) Localization of nanos RNA controls embryonic polarity. Cell 71: 301–313 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Giraldez AJ, Mishima Y, Rihel J, Grocock RJ, Van Dongen S, Inoue K, Enright AJ, Schier AF (2006) Zebrafish MiR-430 promotes deadenylation and clearance of maternal mRNAs. science 312: 75–79 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Hernandez-Huertas L, Kushawah G, Diaz-Moscoso A, Tomas-Gallardo L, Moreno-Sanchez I, da Silva Pescador G, Bazzini AA, Moreno-Mateos MA (2022) Optimized CRISPR-RfxCas13d system for RNA targeting in zebrafish embryos. STAR Protoc 3: 101058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Hernandez-Huertas L, Moreno-Sanchez I, Crespo-Cuadrado J, Vargas-Baco A, da Silva Pescador G, Zhang Y, Wen Z, Florens L, Santos-Pereira JM, Bazzini AA, Moreno-Mateos MA (2025) CRISPR-RfxCas13d screening uncovers Bckdk as a post-translational regulator of maternal-to-zygotic transition in teleosts. EMBO J 44: 7021–7059 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Herzog VA, Reichholf B, Neumann T, Rescheneder P, Bhat P, Burkard TR, Wlotzka W, von Haeseler A, Zuber J, Ameres SL (2017) Thiol-linked alkylation of RNA to assess expression dynamics. Nat Methods 14: 1198–1204 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Holler K, Neuschulz A, Drewe-Boss P, Mintcheva J, Spanjaard B, Arsie R, Ohler U, Landthaler M, Junker JP (2021) Spatio-temporal mRNA tracking in the early zebrafish embryo. Nat Commun 12: 3358. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Kedde M, Strasser MJ, Boldajipour B, Oude Vrielink JA, Slanchev K, le Sage C, Nagel R, Voorhoeve PM, van Duijse J, Orom UA, Lund AH, Perrakis A, Raz E, Agami R (2007) RNA-binding protein Dnd1 inhibits microRNA access to target mRNA. Cell 131: 1273–1286 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Kelley CP, Haerle MC, Wang ET (2022) Negative autoregulation mitigates collateral RNase activity of repeat-targeting CRISPR-Cas13d in mammalian cells. Cell Rep 40: 111226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Kojima ML, Hoppe C, Giraldez AJ (2025) The maternal-to-zygotic transition: reprogramming of the cytoplasm and nucleus. Nat Rev Genet 26: 245–267 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Kontur C, Jeong M, Cifuentes D, Giraldez AJ (2020) Ythdf m(6)A Readers Function Redundantly during Zebrafish Development. Cell Rep 33: 108598. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Koprunner M, Thisse C, Thisse B, Raz E (2001) A zebrafish nanos-related gene is essential for the development of primordial germ cells. Genes Dev 15: 2877–2885 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Korneev D, Merriner DJ, Gervinskas G, de Marco A, O’Bryan MK (2021) New Insights Into Sperm Ultrastructure Through Enhanced Scanning Electron Microscopy. Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology 9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Kretov DA, Sanborn O, McIsaac T, Park E, Imrat I, Wu S, Regis M, Harvey LM, Cifuentes D (2026) RBPscan: A quantitative in vivo tool for profiling RNA-binding protein interactions. Molecular cell 86: 774–789 e777 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Kushawah G, Amaral DB, Hassan H, Gogol M, Nowotarski SH, Bazzini AA (2024) Critical role of Spatio-Temporally Regulated Maternal RNAs in Zebrafish Embryogenesis. bioRxiv: 2024.2011.2007.622483 [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Kushawah G, Hernandez-Huertas L, Abugattas-Nunez Del Prado J, Martinez-Morales JR, DeVore ML, Hassan H, Moreno-Sanchez I, Tomas-Gallardo L, Diaz-Moscoso A, Monges DE, Guelfo JR, Theune WC, Brannan EO, Wang W, Corbin TJ, Moran AM, Sanchez Alvarado A, Malaga-Trillo E, Takacs CM, Bazzini AA, Moreno-Mateos MA (2020) CRISPR-Cas13d Induces Efficient mRNA Knockdown in Animal Embryos. Dev Cell 54: 805–817 e807 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Kushawah G, Nowotarski SH, Carmichael C, Malloy S, Wilson H, Zhang N, Bazzini A (2026) Cth1 is essential for gametogenesis and fertility in zebrafish. bioRxiv: 2026.2008.2026.747083 [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Lai WS, Kennington EA, Blackshear PJ (2003) Tristetraprolin and its family members can promote the cell-free deadenylation of AU-rich element-containing mRNAs by poly (A) ribonuclease. Molecular and cellular biology 23: 3798–3812 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Laver JD, Li X, Ray D, Cook KB, Hahn NA, Nabeel-Shah S, Kekis M, Luo H, Marsolais AJ, Fung KY (2015) Brain tumor is a sequence-specific RNA-binding protein that directs maternal mRNA clearance during the Drosophila maternal-to-zygotic transition. Genome biology 16: 94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Lee MT, Bonneau AR, Takacs CM, Bazzini AA, DiVito KR, Fleming ES, Giraldez AJ (2013) Nanog, Pou5f1 and SoxB1 activate zygotic gene expression during the maternal-to-zygotic transition. Nature 503: 360–364 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Levitt N, Briggs D, Gil A, Proudfoot NJ (1989) Definition of an efficient synthetic poly(A) site. Genes Dev 3: 1019–1025 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Li Y, Xu J, Guo X, Li Z, Cao L, Liu S, Guo Y, Wang G, Luo Y, Zhang Z, Wei X, Zhao Y, Liu T, Wang X, Xia H, Kuang M, Guo Q, Li J, Chen L, Wang Y, Li Q, Wang F, Liu Q, You F (2023) The collateral activity of RfxCas13d can induce lethality in a RfxCas13d knock-in mouse model. Genome Biol 24: 20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Liu Y, Lu X, Shi J, Yu X, Zhang X, Zhu K, Yi Z, Duan E, Li L (2016) BTG4 is a key regulator for maternal mRNA clearance during mouse early embryogenesis. Journal of molecular cell biology 8: 366–368 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Lund E, Liu M, Hartley RS, Sheets MD, Dahlberg JE (2009) Deadenylation of maternal mRNAs mediated by miR-427 in Xenopus laevis embryos. RNA 15: 2351–2363 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Makita S, Takatori H, Nakajima H (2021) Post-Transcriptional Regulation of Immune Responses and Inflammatory Diseases by RNA-Binding ZFP36 Family Proteins. Front Immunol 12: 711633. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Martin KC, Ephrussi A (2009) mRNA localization: gene expression in the spatial dimension. Cell 136: 719–730 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Martinez-Pastor M, Vergara SV, Puig S, Thiele DJ (2013) Negative feedback regulation of the yeast CTH1 and CTH2 mRNA binding proteins is required for adaptation to iron deficiency and iron supplementation. Mol Cell Biol 33: 2178–2187 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Medina-Munoz SG, Kushawah G, Castellano LA, Diez M, DeVore ML, Salazar MJB, Bazzini AA (2021) Crosstalk between codon optimality and cis-regulatory elements dictates mRNA stability. Genome Biol 22: 14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Mishima Y, Giraldez AJ, Takeda Y, Fujiwara T, Sakamoto H, Schier AF, Inoue K (2006) Differential regulation of germline mRNAs in soma and germ cells by zebrafish miR-430. Curr Biol 16: 2135–2142 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Mishima Y, Tomari Y (2016) Codon Usage and 3’ UTR Length Determine Maternal mRNA Stability in Zebrafish. Molecular cell 61: 874–885 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Moreno-Sanchez I, Hernandez-Huertas L, Nahon-Cano D, Martinez-Garcia PM, Treichel AJ, Gomez-Marin C, Tomas-Gallardo L, da Silva Pescador G, Kushawah G, Egidy R, Perera A, Diaz-Moscoso A, Cano-Ruiz A, Walker JA 2nd, Munoz MJ, Holden K, Galceran J, Nieto MA, Bazzini AA, Moreno-Mateos MA (2025) Enhanced RNA-targeting CRISPR-Cas technology in zebrafish. Nat Commun 16: 2591. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Oldenbroek M, Robertson SM, Guven-Ozkan T, Gore S, Nishi Y, Lin R (2012) Multiple RNA-binding proteins function combinatorially to control the soma-restricted expression pattern of the E3 ligase subunit ZIF-1. Dev Biol 363: 388–398 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Oulhen N, Yoshida T, Yajima M, Song JL, Sakuma T, Sakamoto N, Yamamoto T, Wessel GM (2013) The 3’UTR of nanos2 directs enrichment in the germ cell lineage of the sea urchin. Dev Biol 377: 275–283 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Paillard L, Omilli F, Legagneux V, Bassez T, Maniey D, Osborne HB (1998) EDEN and EDEN-BP, a cis element and an associated factor that mediate sequence-specific mRNA deadenylation in Xenopus embryos. The EMBO journal [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Pamula MC, Lehmann R (2024) How germ granules promote germ cell fate. Nat Rev Genet 25: 803–821 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Rabani M, Pieper L, Chew GL, Schier AF (2018) A Massively Parallel Reporter Assay of 3’ UTR Sequences Identifies In Vivo Rules for mRNA Degradation. Molecular cell 70: 565. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Ramos SB (2012) Characterization of DeltaN-Zfp36l2 mutant associated with arrest of early embryonic development and female infertility. J Biol Chem 287: 13116–13127 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Ramos SBV, Stumpo DJ, Kennington EA, Phillips RS, Bock CB, Ribeiro-Neto F, Blackshear PJ (2004) The CCCH tandem zinc-finger protein Zfp36l2 is crucial for female fertility and early embryonic development. Development 131: 4883–4893 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Rynne J, Ortiz-Zapater E, Bagley DC, Zanin O, Doherty G, Kanabar V, Ward J, Jackson DJ, Parsons M, Rosenblatt J, Adcock IM, Martinez-Nunez RT (2023) The RNA binding proteins ZFP36L1 and ZFP36L2 are dysregulated in airway epithelium in human and a murine model of asthma. Front Cell Dev Biol 11: 1241008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Satija R, Farrell JA, Gennert D, Schier AF, Regev A (2015) Spatial reconstruction of single-cell gene expression data. Nat Biotechnol 33: 495–502 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Schubert CM, Lin R, de Vries CJ, Plasterk RH, Priess JR (2000) MEX-5 and MEX-6 function to establish soma/germline asymmetry in early C. elegans embryos. Molecular cell 5: 671–682 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Schwartz AZA, Abdu Y, Nance J (2023) ZIF-1-mediated degradation of zinc finger proteins in the Caenorhabditis elegans germ line. Genetics 225 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Semotok JL, Cooperstock RL, Pinder BD, Vari HK, Lipshitz HD, Smibert CA (2005) Smaug recruits the CCR4/POP2/NOT deadenylase complex to trigger maternal transcript localization in the early Drosophila embryo. Curr Biol 15: 284–294 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Sha QQ, Yu JL, Guo JX, Dai XX, Jiang JC, Zhang YL, Yu C, Ji SY, Jiang Y, Zhang SY, Shen L, Ou XH, Fan HY (2018) CNOT6L couples the selective degradation of maternal transcripts to meiotic cell cycle progression in mouse oocyte. EMBO J 37 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Shangguan H, Huang X, Lin J, Chen R (2024) Knockdown of Kmt2d leads to growth impairment by activating the Akt/beta-catenin signaling pathway. G3 (Bethesda) 14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Shi P, Murphy MR, Aparicio AO, Kesner JS, Fang Z, Chen Z, Trehan A, Guo Y, Wu X (2023) Collateral activity of the CRISPR/RfxCas13d system in human cells. Commun Biol 6: 334. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Siddiqui NU, Karaiskakis A, Goldman AL, Eagle WVI, Low TCH, Luo H, Smibert CA, Gavis ER, Lipshitz HD (2024) Smaug regulates germ plasm assembly and primordial germ cell number in Drosophila embryos. Sci Adv 10: eadg7894. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Stevens CJ, Schipper H, Samallo J, Stroband HW, te Kronnie T (1998) Blastomeres and cells with mesendodermal fates of carp embryos express cth1, a member of the TIS11 family of primary response genes. Int J Dev Biol 42: 181–188 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Tadros W, Goldman AL, Babak T, Menzies F, Vardy L, Orr-Weaver T, Hughes TR, Westwood JT, Smibert CA, Lipshitz HD (2007) SMAUG is a major regulator of maternal mRNA destabilization in Drosophila and its translation is activated by the PAN GU kinase. Developmental cell 12: 143–155 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.te Kronnie G, Stroband H, Schipper H, Samallo J (1999) Zebrafish CTH1, a C3H zinc finger protein, is expressed in ovarian oocytes and embryos. Dev Genes Evol 209: 443–446 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Treguer K, Faucheux C, Veschambre P, Fedou S, Theze N, Thiebaud P (2013) Comparative functional analysis of ZFP36 genes during Xenopus development. PLoS One 8: e54550. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Treichel AJ, Bazzini AA (2022) Casting CRISPR-Cas13d to fish for microprotein functions in animal development. iScience 25: 105547. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Treichel AJ, Bazzini AA, Tornini VA (2026) Functional Testing of Microproteins in a Vertebrate Model of Development. Methods Mol Biol 2992: 183–201 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Ulitsky I, Shkumatava A, Jan CH, Subtelny AO, Koppstein D, Bell GW, Sive H, Bartel DP (2012) Extensive alternative polyadenylation during zebrafish development. Genome Res 22: 2054–2066 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Vastenhouw NL, Cao WX, Lipshitz HD (2019) The maternal-to-zygotic transition revisited. Development 146 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Vejnar CE, Abdel Messih M, Takacs CM, Yartseva V, Oikonomou P, Christiano R, Stoeckius M, Lau S, Lee MT, Beaudoin JD, Musaev D, Darwich-Codore H, Walther TC, Tavazoie S, Cifuentes D, Giraldez AJ (2019) Genome wide analysis of 3’ UTR sequence elements and proteins regulating mRNA stability during maternal-to-zygotic transition in zebrafish. Genome Res 29: 1100–1114 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Vejnar CE, Moreno-Mateos MA, Cifuentes D, Bazzini AA, Giraldez AJ (2016) Optimized CRISPR-Cas9 System for Genome Editing in Zebrafish. Cold Spring Harb Protoc 2016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Walser CB, Lipshitz HD (2011) Transcript clearance during the maternal-to-zygotic transition. Curr Opin Genet Dev 21: 431–443 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Wan Y, El Kholtei J, Jenie I, Colomer-Rosell M, Liu J, Zhang Q, Navajas Acedo J, Du LY, Codina-Tobias M, Wang M, Zheng W, Lin E, Chuang T-H, Mayseless O, Sawh A, Mango SE, Yu G, Bintu B, Schier AF (2026) Whole-embryo spatial transcriptomics at subcellular resolution from gastrulation to organogenesis. Science 391: eadt3439. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Yu C, Ji S-Y, Sha Q-Q, Dang Y, Zhou J-J, Zhang Y-L, Liu Y, Wang Z-W, Hu B, Sun Q-Y (2016) BTG4 is a meiotic cell cycle–coupled maternal-zygotic-transition licensing factor in oocytes. Nature structural & molecular biology 23: 387–394 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Zaessinger S, Busseau I, Simonelig M (2006) Oskar allows nanos mRNA translation in Drosophila embryos by preventing its deadenylation by Smaug/CCR4. Development 133: 4573–4583 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Zhao BS, Wang X, Beadell AV, Lu Z, Shi H, Kuuspalu A, Ho RK, He C (2017) m(6)A-dependent maternal mRNA clearance facilitates zebrafish maternal-to-zygotic transition. Nature 542: 475–478 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Zhao LW, Zhu YZ, Chen H, Wu YW, Pi SB, Chen L, Shen L, Fan HY (2020) PABPN1L mediates cytoplasmic mRNA decay as a placeholder during the maternal-to-zygotic transition. EMBO reports 21: e49956. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Zhou H, Su J, Hu X, Zhou C, Li H, Chen Z, Xiao Q, Wang B, Wu W, Sun Y, Zhou Y, Tang C, Liu F, Wang L, Feng C, Liu M, Li S, Zhang Y, Xu H, Yao H, Shi L, Yang H (2020) Glia-to-Neuron Conversion by CRISPR-CasRx Alleviates Symptoms of Neurological Disease in Mice. Cell 181: 590–603 e516 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Zhou Z, Fan H, Shi R, Zeng Y, Liu R, Gu H, Li Q, Sang Q, Wang L, Shi J, Chen B (2023) A novel homozygous variant in ZFP36L2 cause female infertility due to oocyte maturation defect. Clin Genet 104: 461–465 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplement 1

Data Availability Statement

The Accession number for the RNA-Seq data used in this manuscript is GEO: GSE330436. All the relevant data is available upon request from the corresponding author.


Articles from bioRxiv are provided here courtesy of Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Preprints

RESOURCES