Skip to main content
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 1964 Oct;174(1):132–151. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1964.sp007477

Further studies of static and dynamic fusimotor fibres

A Crowe, P B C Matthews
PMCID: PMC1368930  PMID: 14228608

Full text

PDF
133

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. APPELBERG B. The effect of electrical stimulation in nucleus ruber on the response to stretch in primary and secondary muscle spindle afferents. Acta Physiol Scand. 1962 Oct;56:140–151. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1962.tb02491.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. BESSOU P., EMONET-DENAND F., LAPORTE Y. INCREASE OF PRIMARY ENDINGS DYNAMIC SENSITIVITY BY SLOW ALPHA FIBRES INNERVATING MUSCLE SPINDLES. Life Sci. 1963 Dec;12:948–952. doi: 10.1016/0024-3205(63)90063-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. BIANCONI R., van der MEULEN J. The response to vibration of the end organs of mammalian muscle spindles. J Neurophysiol. 1963 Jan;26:177–190. doi: 10.1152/jn.1963.26.1.177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. COOPER S. The responses of the primary and secondary endings of muscle spindles with intact motor innervation during applied stretch. Q J Exp Physiol Cogn Med Sci. 1961 Oct;46:389–398. doi: 10.1113/expphysiol.1961.sp001558. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. CROWE A., MATTHEWS P. B. THE EFFECTS OF STIMULATION OF STATIC AND DYNAMIC FUSIMOTOR FIBRES ON THE RESPONSE TO STRETCHING OF THE PRIMARY ENDINGS OF MUSCLE SPINDLES. J Physiol. 1964 Oct;174:109–131. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1964.sp007476. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. GRANIT R., HENATSCH H. D. Gamma control of dynamic properties of muscle spindles. J Neurophysiol. 1956 Jul;19(4):356–366. doi: 10.1152/jn.1956.19.4.356. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. GRANIT R., VAN DERMEULEN J. P. The pause during contraction in the discharge of the spindle afferents from primary end organs in cat extensor muscles. Acta Physiol Scand. 1962 Jun-Jul;55:231–244. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1962.tb02436.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. HARVEY R. J., MATTHEWS P. B. The response of de-efferented muscle spindle endings in the cat's soleus to slow extension of the muscle. J Physiol. 1961 Jul;157:370–392. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1961.sp006729. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. JANSEN J. K., MATTHEWS P. B. The central control of the dynamic response of muscle spindle receptors. J Physiol. 1962 May;161:357–378. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1962.sp006892. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. KUFFLER S. W., HUNT C. C., QUILLIAM J. P. Function of medullated small-nerve fibers in mammalian ventral roots; efferent muscle spindle innervation. J Neurophysiol. 1951 Jan;14(1):29–54. doi: 10.1152/jn.1951.14.1.29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. LIPPOLD O. C., REDFEARN J. W., VUCO J. The effect of sinusoidal stretching upon the activity of stretch receptors in voluntary muscle and their reflex responses. J Physiol. 1958 Dec 30;144(3):373–386. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1958.sp006108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. MATTHEWS P. B. MUSCLE SPINDLES AND THEIR MOTOR CONTROL. Physiol Rev. 1964 Apr;44:219–288. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1964.44.2.219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Matthews B. H. Nerve endings in mammalian muscle. J Physiol. 1933 Apr 13;78(1):1–53. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1933.sp002984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES