Skip to main content
International Journal of Molecular Sciences logoLink to International Journal of Molecular Sciences
. 2026 Oct 13;27(20):9052. doi: 10.3390/ijms27209052

JAK-STAT Signaling: Mechanisms and Therapeutics in Stem Cell Biology

Willis X Li 1
Editor: Sabrina Battista1
PMCID: PMC13705232  PMID: 42941825

Abstract

The Janus kinase–signal transducer and activator of transcription (JAK-STAT) pathway is a conserved signaling system that links extracellular cytokine signals to transcriptional regulation of genes controlling cell proliferation, differentiation, and survival. Increasing evidence demonstrates that this pathway plays central roles in stem cell biology across diverse systems, including pluripotent stem cells, adult tissue stem cells, and cancer stem cells. In pluripotent stem cells, STAT3 signaling downstream of leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF) supports self-renewal and maintenance of the undifferentiated state, whereas in adult stem cells, JAK-STAT activity regulates the balance between quiescence, proliferation, and lineage commitment. Stem cell niches further modulate pathway activity through spatially and temporally controlled cytokine signals that coordinate regenerative responses with tissue homeostasis. Recent studies have also revealed noncanonical functions of STAT proteins, including mitochondrial STAT3-dependent metabolic regulation and unphosphorylated STAT-mediated chromatin and heterochromatin regulation that influence stem cell identity and function. Dysregulation of the pathway contributes to pathological conditions, including inflammatory disorders and cancers characterized by stem-like cell populations. Therapeutic targeting of JAK-STAT signaling therefore represents an important strategy in both regenerative medicine and oncology. This review summarizes recent advances in understanding how JAK-STAT signaling regulates stem cell biology, highlighting emerging mechanisms of pathway integration, niche regulation, and therapeutic modulation.

Keywords: JAK-STAT, stem cells, cancer stem cells, niche, metabolism, epigenetics, regenerative medicine, targeted therapy

1. Introduction

Stem cells possess long-term self-renewal capacity and the ability to generate differentiated progeny that maintain tissue homeostasis and support regeneration following injury [1,2]. These properties are regulated by complex signaling networks that integrate extracellular cues with intrinsic transcriptional and metabolic programs. Among these, the Janus kinase–signal transducer and activator of transcription (JAK-STAT) pathway represents a direct and evolutionarily conserved mechanism for translating extracellular signals into transcriptional responses [3,4,5,6].

Originally characterized as a rapid cascade linking cytokine receptor activation to nuclear gene expression, JAK-STAT signaling begins with cytokine binding, which activates receptor-associated JAK kinases [7,8,9,10]. Activated JAKs phosphorylate STAT transcription factors, prompting dimerization, nuclear translocation, and regulation of genes controlling proliferation, differentiation, and survival. Its relatively simple architecture allows cells to respond efficiently to environmental changes [3,4,5,6,11].

In stem cell systems, JAK-STAT signaling is essential for maintaining identity and balancing self-renewal with differentiation. STAT3 activation is critical for pluripotency in mouse embryonic stem cells via LIF-mediated signaling [12,13,14], and the pathway also regulates adult stem cell populations, including hematopoietic, epithelial, and neural systems, where cytokine-mediated signaling influences proliferation, quiescence, and lineage commitment. In Drosophila, JAK-STAT signaling governs germline stem cell maintenance within their niche, highlighting evolutionary conservation and context-dependent regulation [15,16,17]. The Drosophila system has been particularly powerful for dissecting how JAK-STAT signaling operates within intact stem cell niches, revealing principles of spatial signaling gradients, stem cell competition, and non-autonomous regulation that are conserved in mammalian systems [18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26].

Stem cell behavior is strongly influenced by niche interactions, which produce cytokines and growth factors regulating JAK-STAT activity. Through these microenvironmental signals, the pathway integrates immune responses, tissue injury cues, and metabolic states to coordinate regeneration with tissue homeostasis [21,27,28,29,30,31]. In multiple systems, including hematopoietic and epithelial tissues, niche-derived cytokines such as IL-6 family members and interferons dynamically modulate STAT activation in response to stress and inflammation [32,33]. STAT proteins further interact with epigenetic regulators and metabolic pathways to shape gene expression programs that determine stem cell fate [34,35,36,37]. In addition, evidence from Drosophila and mammalian systems demonstrates that STAT contributes to chromatin organization and heterochromatin stability, highlighting conserved noncanonical roles in epigenetic regulation [38,39,40,41].

Dysregulation of JAK-STAT signaling has pathological consequences. Persistent STAT activation is frequently observed in inflammatory diseases and cancers with stem-like tumor cell populations [42,43]. Aberrant activation drives uncontrolled proliferation, survival signaling, and altered differentiation, contributing to tumor progression and therapeutic resistance [44,45,46]. In hematologic malignancies and solid tumors, constitutive activation of STAT3 and STAT5 supports cancer stem cell maintenance, immune evasion, and resistance to therapy [4,47,48,49,50,51]. Chronic cytokine signaling, particularly through IL-6–JAK-STAT3 pathways, further reinforces oncogenic feedback loops within the tumor microenvironment [52,53,54,55,56,57]. These observations have made JAK-STAT a major pharmacological target in oncology and immunology, leading to the development of JAK inhibitors and emerging STAT-targeted therapies [58,59,60,61,62].

In this review, we summarize recent advances in understanding JAK-STAT signaling in stem cell biology, emphasizing mechanisms by which cytokine signaling regulates pluripotent and adult stem cells, the influence of stem cell niches, integration with metabolic and epigenetic networks, and implications of pathway dysregulation in cancer stem cells and therapeutic development.

2. Overview of the JAK-STAT Signaling Pathway

The JAK-STAT pathway is a conserved mechanism transmitting extracellular cytokine signals directly to the nucleus, enabling rapid transcriptional responses. It consists of cytokine receptors, Janus kinases (JAKs), and signal transducers and activators of transcription (STATs). Mammals express four JAKs (JAK1, JAK2, JAK3, and TYK2) and seven STAT family members (STAT1, STAT2, STAT3, STAT4, STAT5A, STAT5B, and STAT6), forming overlapping signaling networks [3,5,63].

Cytokine binding induces receptor dimerization, bringing receptor-associated JAKs into proximity for trans-phosphorylation. JAKs then phosphorylate receptor tyrosine residues, creating docking sites for STATs. STATs are phosphorylated, dimerize, and translocate to the nucleus to regulate genes controlling proliferation, differentiation, and survival [8,64,65]. Serine phosphorylation and other modifications further refine STAT target specificity [66].

Regulation of JAK-STAT signaling involves multiple mechanisms: suppressor of cytokine signaling (SOCS) proteins, protein inhibitors of activated STATs (PIAS), and tyrosine phosphatases like SHP1/2 attenuate signaling, while receptor internalization and degradation ensure transient pathway activity [67,68,69].

Beyond canonical phosphorylation-dependent transcription, STATs have noncanonical functions. STAT3 can localize to mitochondria and the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) to modulate metabolism [70,71], and unphosphorylated STATs regulate chromatin and gene expression independently of cytokine signaling [38,72]. Research studies reveal that Stat92E maintains heterochromatin structure through HP1, linking JAK signaling to epigenetic regulation and genome stability [39,73]. Recent work shows that STAT’s phosphorylation state determines its partitioning between transcriptional and chromatin-associated functions, supporting germline stem cell maintenance and epigenetic integrity [40].

This dual functionality includes rapid transcriptional responses and chromatin regulation. Such integration positions JAK-STAT as a central coordinator of stem cell fate, linking extracellular signals to long-term maintenance of cellular identity and genome stability, with implications for both stem cell biology and cancer (Figure 1) [38,72,74].

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Canonical and noncanonical JAK-STAT signaling mechanisms. Schematic representation of the JAK-STAT signaling pathway. Binding of cytokines to their cognate receptors induces receptor dimerization and activation of receptor-associated Janus kinases (JAKs). Activated JAKs phosphorylate intracellular receptor domains and STAT transcription factors, promoting STAT dimerization and nuclear translocation. STAT dimers regulate transcription of genes involved in cell proliferation, survival, and differentiation. In addition to canonical transcriptional signaling, noncanonical STAT functions have been reported, including mitochondrial localization of STAT3, which modulates oxidative phosphorylation and electron transport chain activity, and heterochromatin-associated unphosphorylated STAT (uSTAT), which maintains heterochromatin stability and genome integrity. STAT signaling also intersects with other pathways (e.g., PI3K–AKT, MAPK) to integrate diverse extracellular cues and fine-tune stem cell fate decisions. Arrows indicate the direction of molecule movement.

3. JAK-STAT Signaling in Pluripotent Stem Cells

Pluripotent stem cells (PSCs) generate all embryonic lineages and maintain self-renewal through a transcriptional network stabilized by JAK-STAT signaling, particularly STAT3 in mouse ESCs (mESCs) [12,75,76,77]. LIF activates the LIFR/gp130 receptor, inducing JAK-mediated phosphorylation of STAT3, which is both necessary and sufficient for self-renewal [78,79]. Experimental STAT3 activation alone preserves pluripotency, while inhibition triggers differentiation. STAT3 also reinforces the naïve pluripotency network by promoting Klf4, Tfcp2l1, and other key transcription factors [14,35,80,81].

STAT3 integrates with the core pluripotency triad (OCT4, SOX2, and NANOG), co-occupying enhancer regions to coordinate transcription [82]. It buffers against differentiation cues, particularly FGF–ERK signals, and, in combination with dual MEK/GSK3 inhibition (“2i”), locks ESCs into a naïve ground state resembling the preimplantation epiblast [83,84]. Naïve and primed PSC states differ in STAT3 dependency: naïve mESCs rely heavily on LIF–STAT3, while primed epiblast stem cells depend on FGF/Activin and respond less to STAT3 [85]. STAT3 activation can revert primed cells toward naïve-like states, defining a functional boundary between pluripotent states [81].

In human PSCs, conventional ESCs and iPSCs are largely in a primed state, relying on FGF2 and Activin/Nodal rather than LIF [86]. Naïve-like human PSCs can acquire or regain STAT3 responsiveness under defined culture conditions, highlighting species-specific differences [81]. During reprogramming to iPSCs, STAT3 enhances efficiency and supports acquisition of stable pluripotency, cooperating with KLF4 to reinforce transcriptional networks [87]. Nevertheless, excessive STAT3 activity is deleterious; SOCS proteins and phosphatases constrain signaling, preventing aberrant proliferation and oncogenic transformation [88].

In summary, STAT3 functions as a master regulator of naïve pluripotency, particularly in mouse ESCs, by integrating extracellular cues with the core transcriptional network and epigenetic machinery. Its context-dependent activity across species has important implications for maintaining and directing pluripotent stem cells for regenerative applications. Therapeutic strategies that modulate STAT3 activity may therefore need to balance maintenance of pluripotency with controlled differentiation, an issue relevant to the clinical development of stem-cell-based therapies (Figure 2).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Context-dependent roles of JAK-STAT signaling in stem cell regulation. JAK-STAT signaling regulates multiple aspects of stem cell biology across different cellular contexts. In pluripotent stem cells, STAT3 signaling promotes maintenance of the undifferentiated state and supports self-renewal. In adult stem cells such as hematopoietic stem cells, cytokine-mediated STAT activation regulates transitions between quiescence, proliferation, and differentiation. In tissue-resident stem cells, inflammatory cytokines can activate STAT pathways to stimulate regenerative responses following injury. Dysregulated STAT signaling can also contribute to the maintenance of cancer stem cells, promoting tumor initiation and therapeutic resistance. Arrows indicate the direction of molecule movement.

4. JAK-STAT Signaling in Adult Stem Cell Regulation

Adult stem cells maintain tissue homeostasis by balancing long-term self-renewal with production of differentiated progeny. In many tissues, cytokine-mediated activation of JAK-STAT signaling plays a central role in regulating these processes [21,27,89]. Hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) represent one of the best-characterized systems in which JAK-STAT signaling controls stem cell behavior, influencing quiescence, proliferation, and lineage specification [37,90].

HSCs sustain lifelong blood production through tightly regulated self-renewal and multilineage differentiation [91,92]. Cytokines, including thrombopoietin, erythropoietin, interleukins, and interferons, activate JAK kinases and downstream STAT transcription factors in hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells [93,94]. STAT5, in particular, is critical for hematopoietic stem cell expansion and survival [95]. Loss of STAT5 impairs erythroid and lymphoid development, whereas constitutive activation enhances stem cell self-renewal and competitive repopulating capacity [96]. However, sustained hyperactivation skews lineage output and predisposes cells to myeloproliferative disease [97], illustrating the importance of precise regulation of signaling intensity. Tyrosine-unphosphorylated STAT5 (uSTAT5) is also important in maintaining HSCs [37], possibly involving heterochromatin regulation [40,73,98]. The molecular mechanisms underlying these dosage-dependent effects of JAK-STAT signaling in hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells have been extensively reviewed, highlighting how pathway activity levels dictate the balance between self-renewal, lineage commitment, and leukemic transformation [90,95].

Adult HSCs normally reside in a quiescent state that protects genomic integrity and preserves long-term regenerative potential [99]. JAK-STAT signaling participates in transitions between quiescence and proliferative activation in response to physiological demands [37]. Type I interferons activate STAT1 signaling and drive dormant HSCs into the cell cycle during infection or stress responses [100]. While transient activation can enhance regenerative output, chronic stimulation leads to stem cell exhaustion, demonstrating that temporal regulation of cytokine signaling is essential for maintaining stem cell homeostasis [101].

The bone marrow microenvironment provides critical regulatory signals that shape JAK-STAT activity in hematopoietic stem cells [90]. The niche consists of mesenchymal stromal cells, endothelial cells, osteoblasts, and neural elements that produce cytokines and chemokines influencing stem cell behavior [102]. CXCL12-producing stromal cells play a key role in maintaining HSC quiescence and retention within perivascular regions of the marrow [103]. Spatial gradients of cytokines within the niche create localized zones of STAT activation, contributing to heterogeneity in stem cell behavior across the hematopoietic hierarchy [104].

Beyond hematopoiesis, JAK-STAT signaling regulates tissue-resident stem cells in multiple organs. In epithelial tissues such as the intestine and skin, inflammatory cytokines activate STAT3 signaling to stimulate regenerative proliferation following injury [105,106]. Similar mechanisms operate in neural stem cells, where cytokine-mediated STAT activation influences lineage specification and tissue repair [107]. Together, these findings indicate that JAK-STAT activity is highly context-dependent, with its effects on stem cell maintenance and regeneration determined by tissue type, cytokine environment, and signaling intensity (Figure 3) [65,108].

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Integration of JAK-STAT signaling with stem cell niches and regulatory networks. Stem cell behavior is influenced by signals from the surrounding microenvironment. Cytokines produced by stromal cells, immune cells, and differentiated progeny activate JAK-STAT signaling in nearby stem cells. This pathway integrates extracellular cues with intracellular regulatory networks, including metabolic pathways and epigenetic regulators. Spatial and temporal control of cytokine signaling within the niche generates gradients of STAT activation that influence stem cell fate decisions, allowing tissues to balance regenerative responses with long-term homeostasis. Arrows indicate the direction of molecule movement.

5. Stem Cell Niches and Microenvironmental Control

Stem cell behavior is profoundly influenced by the microenvironment or niche in which stem cells reside. The niche provides structural support and delivers biochemical signals that regulate stem cell quiescence, proliferation, differentiation, and survival. JAK-STAT signaling frequently acts as a key mediator of these niche-derived signals, integrating cytokine inputs with intrinsic transcriptional programs that determine stem cell fate. Cytokines produced by stromal cells, immune cells, and differentiated progeny can activate JAK kinases and STAT transcription factors in neighboring stem cells, thereby coordinating tissue maintenance with environmental conditions [21,109,110].

Paracrine signaling is a major mechanism through which niches regulate stem cells. In many tissues, cytokines secreted by stromal or immune cells activate STAT signaling pathways in nearby stem cells. For example, IL-6 family cytokines activate STAT3 to stimulate regenerative proliferation during tissue repair. Similar mechanisms operate in intestinal, neural, and epithelial tissues, where inflammatory signals transiently enhance stem cell proliferation to restore tissue integrity following injury [111,112,113]. The Drosophila midgut provides a powerful model for this regenerative mechanism, where damage-induced enterocyte apoptosis triggers production of the cytokine Unpaired (Upd), which activates JAK-STAT signaling in adjacent intestinal stem cells to drive their proliferation and subsequent differentiation, thereby restoring epithelial integrity [114]. Autocrine signaling also contributes to JAK-STAT regulation, as stem cells themselves can produce cytokines that reinforce signaling loops controlling self-renewal and differentiation [27,115].

Insights from Drosophila melanogaster have provided a particularly clear mechanistic paradigm for niche-mediated JAK-STAT regulation, which can be compared with related mechanisms identified in mammalian tissues. In the testis niche, specialized hub cells secrete the cytokine Unpaired (Upd), which activates JAK-STAT signaling in adjacent germline stem cells (GSCs) and cyst stem cells, thereby promoting self-renewal and preventing differentiation [21,27,116,117]. The restricted production of Upd establishes a short-range signaling gradient, ensuring that only stem cells in direct contact with the niche maintain high STAT activity, while displaced daughter cells experience reduced signaling and initiate differentiation [15,16,21]. This spatially confined cytokine signaling exemplifies how niches impose positional control over stem cell fate decisions. Further work has shown that JAK-STAT signaling also regulates the initial establishment of the male germline stem cell pool during embryogenesis, before the niche is fully formed, indicating additional roles in stem cell specification [118].

Spatial organization within niches further influences JAK-STAT signaling dynamics. Stem cells are often positioned near specialized stromal cells that produce cytokine gradients, generating localized zones of signaling activity [103,119,120,121]. In the bone marrow, for example, perivascular stromal cells produce CXCL12 and other factors that maintain hematopoietic stem cell quiescence and retention within the niche [104,122,123]. Similar spatial arrangements occur in epithelial tissues, where stem cells at the base of regenerative compartments receive signals that differ from those experienced by differentiated progeny [124]. Such spatial heterogeneity creates gradients of STAT activation that contribute to differential gene expression across the stem cell hierarchy, a principle conserved from Drosophila niches to mammalian tissues [115,125]. A particularly striking example of JAK-STAT-mediated niche regulation comes from studies of stem cell competition in the Drosophila testis, where differences in STAT activity determine which germline stem cells are retained within the niche and which are displaced, ensuring optimal stem cell pool quality [18,19]. In the Drosophila intestine, JAK-STAT signaling does not operate in isolation but cooperates extensively with EGFR, Hippo, and Wingless pathways to coordinate stem cell proliferation and lineage decisions, illustrating how multiple niche-derived signals are integrated at the stem cell level [126,127].

Although Drosophila studies have provided important mechanistic insights into how localized JAK-STAT signaling regulates stem cell–niche interactions, the extent to which these mechanisms are conserved in human tissues requires further investigation. In particular, the principles of short-range cytokine gradients, differential STAT activation according to stem cell position, and niche-dependent stem cell competition should be tested in human primary stem and progenitor cells and in physiologically relevant tissue models. Human intestinal and other epithelial organoids, bone marrow stem/progenitor cell cultures, and co-culture systems incorporating stromal or immune cells could help determine whether spatially restricted cytokine signaling similarly controls human stem cell proliferation, quiescence, and differentiation. Single-cell and spatial transcriptomic approaches, together with multiplexed imaging and functional perturbation of JAK-STAT components, may further define the cellular sources, spatial distribution, and temporal dynamics of pathway activity in human tissues. Such studies will help distinguish conserved mechanisms from species-specific features and establish which components of niche-mediated JAK-STAT signaling may have translational or therapeutic relevance.

Temporal regulation of cytokine signaling is also essential for maintaining stem cell homeostasis. Acute activation of JAK-STAT signaling during injury or infection can stimulate regenerative proliferation, whereas chronic activation may lead to stem cell exhaustion or pathological expansion. Consequently, feedback regulators such as suppressor of cytokine signaling (SOCS) proteins and protein tyrosine phosphatases act to dampen JAK-STAT signaling after activation, preventing sustained pathway activity that could disrupt tissue homeostasis [18,128,129].

Through these spatial and temporal mechanisms, stem cell niches regulate JAK-STAT signaling to coordinate stem cell maintenance, differentiation, and tissue organization. The Drosophila niche provides a particularly clear example of how localized cytokine signaling establishes positional differences in STAT activity, while mammalian studies indicate that related principles operate through stromal, immune, and epithelial signals during tissue homeostasis and injury. Defining how these mechanisms are conserved and functionally regulated in human tissues will be important for translating niche-mediated JAK-STAT biology into therapeutic strategies for tissue repair and disease (Figure 4). The clinical and therapeutic implications of modulating JAK-STAT signaling in regenerative medicine and disease are discussed further in Section 8.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Future perspectives and translational opportunities for JAK-STAT signaling in stem cell biology. The figure summarizes emerging directions for translating mechanistic insights into JAK-STAT signaling into therapeutic applications in regenerative medicine and oncology. Key mechanistic areas include canonical cytokine–receptor–JAK-STAT signaling, noncanonical STAT functions in mitochondrial metabolism and chromatin regulation, and spatial and temporal regulation by stem cell niches and the tissue microenvironment. Major priorities for future research include validation of these mechanisms in human stem and progenitor cells and physiologically relevant organoid or tissue models, determination of conserved versus species-specific mechanisms, characterization of signaling gradients and cell-type-specific responses, and identification of signaling-state biomarkers and therapeutic targets. These advances may support more precise modulation of JAK-STAT signaling through JAK inhibitors, STAT3/STAT5-directed approaches, cytokine–receptor modulation, and metabolic or chromatin-associated pathways for applications in tissue regeneration and cancer treatment. Arrows indicate the direction of molecule movement.

6. Metabolic and Epigenetic Integration of Canonical and Noncanonical JAK-STAT Signaling in Stem Cells

Stem cell function is closely linked to cellular metabolism and epigenetic state. Increasing evidence indicates that JAK-STAT signaling integrates extracellular cytokine signals with metabolic and chromatin regulatory networks to coordinate stem cell fate decisions. STAT transcription factors regulate genes involved in mitochondrial activity, glycolysis, and biosynthetic pathways, thereby linking environmental signals to metabolic programs that support stem cell maintenance and proliferation [35,130].

Quiescent stem cells are generally metabolically quiescent, with low oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) activity and dependence on glycolysis. This configuration minimizes reactive oxygen species (ROS) production and helps preserve genomic integrity. Activation of cytokine signaling through JAK-STAT pathways can shift this balance by inducing transcriptional programs that promote mitochondrial function and biosynthetic activity during regenerative proliferation [131,132]. In hematopoietic stem cells, transitions between quiescence and activation involve coordinated changes in metabolic pathways, protein synthesis, and cell-cycle regulators [133].

In addition to transcriptional regulation, STAT proteins can directly influence metabolic processes through noncanonical mechanisms. Mitochondrial localization of STAT3 has been shown to modulate oxidative phosphorylation and electron transport chain activity, demonstrating that STAT proteins can regulate metabolism independently of their nuclear transcriptional functions [134,135]. These mitochondrial STAT3 findings derive in part from broader cellular systems and should therefore be distinguished from direct evidence in bona fide stem cells. These findings, together with broader evidence for unphosphorylated STAT functions, highlight the versatility of JAK-STAT signaling in coordinating cellular responses to environmental cues.

Epigenetic regulation provides another layer of integration between cytokine signaling and stem cell identity. STAT proteins recruit chromatin-modifying enzymes and interact with epigenetic regulators to control accessibility of lineage-specific genes. For example, STAT3 cooperates with pluripotency factors and chromatin remodelers to regulate gene expression programs in stem cells [34,136,137]. Cytokine-driven STAT activation can reshape the epigenetic landscape, enabling dynamic transitions between self-renewal and differentiation states. In parallel, studies in Drosophila have demonstrated that STAT directly contributes to heterochromatin organization and genome stability, revealing a conserved noncanonical role in chromatin regulation that extends beyond transcriptional control [39,74,138,139], which is conserved from Drosophila to mammals as revealed by the following mammalian studies [73,140]. These noncanonical chromatin functions of STAT are particularly important in the germline stem cell lineage, where STAT’s phosphorylation state determines its partitioning between transcriptional activation and heterochromatin maintenance, thereby coupling cytokine signaling with long-term epigenetic integrity [40,98].

There is an integration of canonical and noncanonical STAT functions in stem cell systems. In Drosophila germline stem cells, STAT activity coordinates transcriptional outputs with chromatin organization to maintain stem cell identity and niche interactions [40]. Complementary computational modeling approaches have revealed that differences in JAK-STAT signaling dynamics between somatic and germline stem cells can generate distinct regulatory outcomes, emphasizing how pathway kinetics and network structure contribute to cell-type-specific regulation [128]. These findings highlight the importance of considering both biochemical signaling and systems-level properties of the pathway.

Collectively, these findings indicate that canonical and noncanonical JAK-STAT functions are closely integrated with metabolic and epigenetic regulation in stem cells. Rather than acting solely as a transcriptional relay, STAT signaling can influence mitochondrial metabolism and chromatin organization, providing additional mechanisms through which stem cells respond to physiological and environmental changes.

7. JAK-STAT Dysregulation and Cancer Stem Cells

Aberrant activation of JAK-STAT signaling is a hallmark of many cancers and plays a particularly important role in the maintenance of cancer stem cells (CSCs). CSCs represent a subpopulation of tumor cells with self-renewal capacity and the ability to drive tumor growth, metastasis, and therapeutic resistance. Persistent STAT activation, particularly of STAT3 and STAT5, promotes transcriptional programs that support stem-like properties, survival signaling, and immune evasion in malignant cells [47,48].

In hematologic malignancies, constitutive activation of JAK2 or STAT5 can drive uncontrolled proliferation of stem and progenitor cells. Mutations such as JAK2 V617F result in persistent pathway activation and are a defining feature of several myeloproliferative neoplasms. These mutations enhance cytokine signaling sensitivity and promote expansion of malignant stem cell populations [141,142]. Similar mechanisms operate in leukemia, where dysregulated JAK-STAT signaling contributes to leukemic stem cell maintenance, altered self-renewal programs, and resistance to therapy [143,144].

Solid tumors also exploit STAT signaling to maintain cancer stem cell populations, where studies use bulk tumor cells or other malignant cell populations rather than experimentally defined CSCs; these findings provide mechanistic context but do not by themselves establish a CSC-specific function. STAT3 activation promotes epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT), enhances tumor-initiating capacity, and regulates genes involved in proliferation, survival, and angiogenesis. Elevated STAT3 activity has been observed in breast, glioblastoma, colorectal, and pancreatic cancers, where it contributes to tumor progression and metastatic potential [4,44,49,145]. In colorectal cancer specifically, persistent JAK-STAT activation promotes cancer stem cell maintenance, drives epithelial-mesenchymal transition, and confers resistance to chemotherapy and targeted agents, making the pathway an attractive therapeutic target in this malignancy [146]. In addition, STAT3 signaling supports the maintenance of CSC phenotypes by regulating core stemness-associated transcription factors such as NANOG, SOX2, and OCT4 [147]. Importantly, STAT3 also modulates the tumor microenvironment by regulating inflammatory cytokines that reinforce oncogenic signaling loops, including IL-6-mediated autocrine and paracrine activation [45,148].

Therapeutic resistance is another key feature associated with JAK-STAT-driven cancer stem cells. Persistent STAT signaling can upregulate anti-apoptotic genes (e.g., BCL-XL, MCL1) and drug efflux transporters, enabling tumor cells to survive chemotherapy and targeted therapies [149,150]. Moreover, JAK-STAT signaling contributes to immune evasion by regulating Programmed Death-Ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression and shaping an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment [151,152]. As a result, JAK-STAT signaling pathways have become major targets for the development of anti-cancer therapies aimed at eliminating malignant stem cell populations, including JAK inhibitors and STAT3-targeted strategies currently under clinical investigation [153,154].

8. Therapeutic Targeting and Clinical Implications in Regenerative Medicine and Oncology

Given its central role in stem cell regulation and oncogenesis, the JAK-STAT pathway has become an important target for therapeutic intervention. Pharmacological inhibitors of JAK kinases have been developed to treat inflammatory disorders, hematologic malignancies, and other diseases characterized by aberrant cytokine signaling (Table 1). Several JAK inhibitors are now approved for clinical use, including ruxolitinib, tofacitinib, and baricitinib, which target specific JAK family members to suppress pathological signaling [155,156,157]. In addition, newer agents such as fedratinib and upadacitinib further expand the therapeutic landscape by offering increased selectivity and alternative safety profiles [158,159].

Table 1.

Representative therapeutic strategies targeting the JAK-STAT pathway.

Therapeutic Strategy Representative Agents/Approaches Principal Target Clinical Status/Application Relevance to Stem Cell Biology
JAK1/2 inhibition Ruxolitinib JAK1/JAK2 Clinically established; myelofibrosis and other hematologic disorders Suppresses aberrant cytokine signaling; potential modulation of pathological stem/progenitor-cell activity
JAK1/3 inhibition Tofacitinib JAK1/JAK3 Clinically established; inflammatory and autoimmune diseases Modulates cytokine-dependent stem-cell and tissue inflammatory environments
JAK1/2 inhibition Baricitinib JAK1/JAK2 Clinically established; inflammatory diseases Alters cytokine signaling that influences tissue repair and immune–stem-cell interactions
Selective JAK2 inhibition Fedratinib JAK2 Clinically established; myelofibrosis Targets pathological JAK2 signaling in hematopoietic disease
Selective JAK1 inhibition Upadacitinib JAK1 Clinically established; inflammatory diseases Modulates cytokine signaling relevant to tissue inflammation and regeneration
STAT3-directed approaches STAT3 inhibitors, antisense oligonucleotides, or other STAT3-modulating strategies STAT3 Primarily experimental/preclinical; selected clinical investigation Potentially targets STAT3-dependent stemness, survival, metabolism, or tumor-promoting signaling
STAT5-directed approaches STAT5 inhibitors/modulators STAT5 Experimental/preclinical May interfere with STAT5-dependent maintenance of normal or malignant stem/progenitor populations
Cytokine receptor modulation Targeting IL-6/IL-6R, LIF/LIFR, or related cytokine pathways Upstream JAK-STAT activation Clinically established for selected inflammatory diseases; broader applications under investigation May alter niche-derived signals controlling stem-cell proliferation, differentiation, and regeneration
Noncanonical STAT targeting Modulation of mitochondrial STAT3 or STAT–chromatin/HP1 interactions Noncanonical STAT functions Experimental/preclinical Emerging strategy targeting metabolic or epigenetic mechanisms associated with stem-cell and cancer-cell states

Clinical status refers to established therapeutic use of representative agents; emerging STAT-directed and noncanonical STAT approaches remain primarily investigational. Therapeutic effects on bona fide normal stem cells, progenitors, or cancer stem cells may differ according to tissue, disease context, and signaling state.

In hematologic malignancies such as myelofibrosis and polycythemia vera, JAK inhibitors reduce disease symptoms and decrease inflammatory cytokine production by blocking constitutive JAK-STAT activation. These therapies demonstrate the clinical relevance of targeting cytokine signaling pathways in diseases driven by aberrant stem cell expansion [64,160]. However, while JAK inhibitors improve clinical outcomes, they often do not fully eradicate malignant stem cells, highlighting the need for combination strategies targeting downstream or parallel pathways [161]. Emerging evidence indicates that the bone marrow microenvironment plays a critical role in this therapeutic resistance, as different niche compartments can support malignant stem cells carrying the same oncogenic JAK2 mutation, leading to variable responses to JAK inhibitor treatment [162].

Beyond oncology, substantial preclinical evidence supports JAK-STAT signaling as a regulator of tissue regeneration. In skin wound healing, STAT3 activation promotes keratinocyte proliferation, migration, survival, and re-epithelialization, while modulation of STAT3-regulatory pathways can improve healing in experimental chronic and diabetic wounds [163]. In the intestinal epithelium, IL-22–JAK-STAT3 signaling promotes epithelial survival, proliferation, and mucosal restitution following injury [164,165]. Importantly, JAK inhibitors have entered clinical practice for inflammatory bowel diseases, including ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease, where treatment can improve clinical and endoscopic outcomes and promote mucosal healing [164,166,167]. Thus, intestinal disease provides an important example in which therapeutic manipulation of JAK-STAT signaling has progressed from mechanistic studies toward clinical application, although the beneficial effects of pathway inhibition reflect suppression of pathological inflammation rather than direct stimulation of epithelial regeneration.

JAK-STAT signaling also contributes to liver regeneration and neural repair. These examples primarily reflect responses of differentiated cells and progenitors rather than direct evidence of bona fide tissue stem cells. During hepatic injury, IL-6 activates JAK-STAT3 signaling in hepatocytes, promoting survival and cell-cycle entry during the early regenerative response [168,169,170,171]. Experimental disruption of STAT3 impairs hepatocyte proliferation, supporting its importance in physiological liver regeneration. In the nervous system, STAT3 contributes to neuronal survival and axonal regeneration after peripheral nerve injury, while STAT3 activity in Schwann cells supports the repair phenotype and production of neurotrophic factors [172,173]. These findings provide a rationale for therapeutic modulation of JAK-STAT signaling in liver injury and neural repair, although clinical translation remains less advanced than in oncology and inflammatory disease.

However, therapeutic manipulation of JAK-STAT signaling must be approached cautiously. Because the pathway regulates diverse physiological processes, including immunity, hematopoiesis, and tissue regeneration, systemic inhibition can lead to immunosuppression, increased infection risk, and hematologic toxicities [174,175]. Long-term inhibition may also disrupt normal stem cell function and tissue homeostasis, underscoring the importance of dosage, timing, and tissue specificity in therapeutic design.

Advances in molecular biology and drug development are enabling increasingly precise interventions within the JAK-STAT pathway. Emerging strategies include selective STAT inhibitors, modulation of upstream cytokine signaling, and targeting of pathway regulators such as SOCS proteins [176,177]. In addition, novel approaches aimed at disrupting STAT3 dimerization, DNA binding, or mitochondrial functions highlight the growing interest in targeting both canonical and noncanonical STAT activities [178,179]. These approaches may ultimately allow therapeutic manipulation of stem cell signaling networks to promote regeneration while limiting oncogenic risk.

9. Emerging Technologies and Systems-Level Approaches

Advances in high-throughput and systems-level technologies are providing new insights into the regulation of JAK-STAT signaling in stem cell biology. Modern experimental approaches allow investigators to examine signaling dynamics, transcriptional networks, and cellular heterogeneity with unprecedented resolution. These tools are revealing how cytokine signaling pathways operate within complex stem cell populations and their surrounding microenvironments [180,181].

Single-cell transcriptomics has become a particularly powerful method for dissecting signaling heterogeneity within stem cell compartments. By profiling gene expression in thousands of individual cells, single-cell RNA sequencing can identify distinct stem and progenitor cell states and reveal transcriptional programs associated with STAT activation. These studies have demonstrated that JAK-STAT signaling is often dynamically regulated across stem cell populations, generating functional heterogeneity that contributes to tissue homeostasis and regenerative capacity [182]. Integration with single-cell ATAC-seq and multi-omics approaches further enables the linking of STAT-dependent transcriptional outputs with chromatin accessibility and regulatory element activity [183,184].

Spatial transcriptomics and imaging-based approaches are further enhancing understanding of how signaling pathways operate within stem cell niches. These technologies allow researchers to map cytokine expression and STAT activation within intact tissues, providing insight into the spatial organization of signaling networks that regulate stem cell behavior. Such analyses are particularly valuable for understanding how local microenvironments shape signaling gradients and influence stem cell fate decisions [185,186]. Emerging multiplexed imaging and in situ sequencing methods now enable simultaneous visualization of signaling components, transcriptional states, and cell–cell interactions at near-single-cell resolution [187].

Computational modeling and systems biology approaches are also contributing to the study of JAK-STAT signaling. Mathematical models of cytokine signaling networks can simulate pathway dynamics, predict feedback regulation, and identify key control nodes that determine signaling outcomes. These approaches have helped explain how differences in signaling thresholds and feedback loops can produce distinct cellular responses to similar cytokine stimuli [188,189]. Work integrating computational simulation with stem cell biology further demonstrates how distinct JAK-STAT signaling dynamics in somatic versus germline stem cells can generate cell-type-specific regulatory outcomes [40,128]. Integration of computational modeling with experimental data is increasingly important for understanding the complex regulatory networks governing stem cell behavior.

Together, these emerging technologies are transforming the study of cytokine signaling in stem cell systems. By combining single-cell analysis, spatial mapping, and computational modeling, researchers are beginning to construct comprehensive frameworks describing how JAK-STAT signaling regulates stem cell function within complex tissue environments [121,190]. Increasingly, these integrative approaches also enable the identification of therapeutic targets and predictive biomarkers by linking signaling dynamics to functional stem cell states.

10. Future Directions and Outstanding Questions

Despite substantial progress in understanding the roles of JAK-STAT signaling in stem cell biology, many important questions remain. One major challenge is to determine how distinct STAT family members generate context-specific transcriptional outputs in different stem cell populations. Although STAT proteins share structural similarities and can recognize related DNA motifs, they often regulate distinct gene networks that control stem cell fate decisions. Understanding how cofactors, chromatin context, and signaling crosstalk shape these transcriptional programs will be essential for elucidating the mechanisms underlying pathway specificity.

Another important area for future research involves the integration of JAK-STAT signaling with other regulatory pathways that control stem cell behavior. Stem cells respond to multiple environmental signals simultaneously, including cues from pathways such as Wnt, Notch, Hedgehog, and MAPK. Interactions between these pathways can produce synergistic or antagonistic effects that influence stem cell maintenance and differentiation. Dissecting these complex signaling networks will require both experimental and computational approaches capable of analyzing pathway interactions at multiple levels.

The noncanonical functions of STAT proteins also remain an active area of investigation. Increasing evidence indicates that STAT proteins can regulate mitochondrial activity, chromatin organization, and other cellular processes independently of classical transcriptional signaling. How these noncanonical roles contribute to stem cell maintenance and differentiation is not yet fully understood. The Drosophila germline stem cell system, with its well-defined niche and genetic tractability, offers a powerful model to dissect these noncanonical STAT functions in vivo, particularly how unphosphorylated STAT contributes to chromatin organization and stem cell identity across generations.

Finally, a major goal of future research is to translate mechanistic insights into therapeutic strategies. Targeting JAK-STAT signaling holds promise for treating diseases involving stem cell dysregulation, including cancers driven by malignant stem cells and degenerative disorders requiring enhanced regenerative capacity. However, because this pathway regulates diverse physiological processes, therapeutic interventions must be carefully designed to avoid disrupting normal tissue homeostasis.

Addressing these challenges will require interdisciplinary approaches integrating molecular biology, genomics, computational modeling, and translational research. Continued investigation of JAK-STAT signaling in stem cell systems will therefore provide important insights into both fundamental biology and clinical applications. A particularly important frontier is the translation of mechanistic insights from model systems to human disease. Germline and somatic mutations in JAK-STAT pathway components cause a spectrum of human disorders, ranging from inborn errors of immunity to myeloproliferative neoplasms and leukemias. Understanding how specific mutations alter STAT activity thresholds in distinct stem and progenitor cell populations will be essential for developing genotype-directed therapies that restore normal signaling without disrupting essential physiological functions.

11. Conclusions

The JAK-STAT signaling pathway represents a central regulatory mechanism linking extracellular cytokine signals to transcriptional programs that control stem cell behavior. Across diverse biological systems, this pathway regulates key processes, including stem cell self-renewal, proliferation, quiescence, and differentiation. In pluripotent stem cells, STAT signaling contributes to maintenance of the undifferentiated state, whereas in adult tissues, the pathway integrates cytokine signals from the microenvironment to coordinate regeneration and tissue homeostasis.

Recent studies have revealed that JAK-STAT signaling operates within a broader regulatory framework involving stem cell niches, metabolic pathways, and epigenetic mechanisms. These interactions provide multiple levels at which JAK-STAT activity can be therapeutically modulated, including cytokine receptor signaling, JAK kinase activity, STAT3/STAT5 function, and noncanonical STAT regulation of metabolism and chromatin. At the same time, dysregulation of JAK-STAT signaling contributes to pathological conditions, including inflammatory diseases and cancers characterized by stem-like cell populations.

Advances in single-cell technologies, spatial transcriptomics, and computational modeling are providing new insights into how JAK-STAT signaling operates within complex stem cell systems. These approaches are revealing previously unrecognized heterogeneity in signaling states and uncovering regulatory mechanisms that govern stem cell function at the systems level. Such approaches may help identify tissue-specific therapeutic targets and biomarkers that enable more selective modulation of JAK-STAT signaling.

Continued investigation of JAK-STAT signaling in stem cell biology will deepen understanding of how extracellular signals shape cellular identity and tissue regeneration. Clinically, the challenge is to distinguish beneficial, transient JAK-STAT activation that supports tissue repair from persistent signaling that promotes inflammation, stem cell dysfunction, or malignant transformation. Therapeutic strategies that selectively inhibit pathological JAK-STAT activity or modulate specific STAT functions in a tissue- and context-dependent manner may therefore provide opportunities in both regenerative medicine and oncology.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

Funding Statement

This study was supported in part by the National Institutes of Health (R03CA286683 to W.X.L.).

Footnotes

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

References

  • 1.Blanpain C., Fuchs E. Stem cell plasticity. Plasticity of epithelial stem cells in tissue regeneration. Science. 2014;344:1242281. doi: 10.1126/science.1242281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Banjac I., Maimets M., Jensen K.B. Maintenance of high-turnover tissues during and beyond homeostasis. Cell Stem Cell. 2023;30:348–361. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2023.03.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Levy D.E., Darnell J.E., Jr. Stats: Transcriptional control and biological impact. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2002;3:651–662. doi: 10.1038/nrm909. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Yu H., Lee H., Herrmann A., Buettner R., Jove R. Revisiting STAT3 signalling in cancer: New and unexpected biological functions. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2014;14:736–746. doi: 10.1038/nrc3818. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Hu X., Li J., Fu M., Zhao X., Wang W. The JAK/STAT signaling pathway: From bench to clinic. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2021;6:402. doi: 10.1038/s41392-021-00791-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Stark G.R., Darnell J.E. The JAK-STAT pathway at twenty. Immunity. 2012;36:503–514. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2012.03.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Heim M.H. The Jak-STAT pathway: Cytokine signalling from the receptor to the nucleus. J. Recept. Signal Transduct. Res. 1999;19:75–120. doi: 10.3109/10799899909036638. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Villarino A.V., Kanno Y., O’Shea J.J. Mechanisms and consequences of Jak-STAT signaling in the immune system. Nat. Immunol. 2017;18:374–384. doi: 10.1038/ni.3691. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Schindler C., Fu X.Y., Improta T., Aebersold R., Darnell J.E. Proteins of transcription factor ISGF-3: One gene encodes the 91-and 84-kDa ISGF-3 proteins that are activated by interferon alpha. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1992;89:7836–7839. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.16.7836. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Fu X.Y., Schindler C., Improta T., Aebersold R., Darnell J.E., Jr. The proteins of ISGF-3, the interferon alpha-induced transcriptional activator, define a gene family involved in signal transduction. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1992;89:7840–7843. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.16.7840. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Philips R.L., Wang Y., Cheon H., Kanno Y., Gadina M., Sartorelli V., Horvath C.M., Darnell J.E., Stark G.R., O’Shea J.J. The JAK-STAT pathway at 30: Much learned, much more to do. Cell. 2022;185:3857–3876. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2022.09.023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Niwa H., Burdon T., Chambers I., Smith A. Self-renewal of pluripotent embryonic stem cells is mediated via activation of STAT3. Genes. Dev. 1998;12:2048–2060. doi: 10.1101/gad.12.13.2048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Raz R., Lee C.K., Cannizzaro L.A., d’Eustachio P., Levy D.E. Essential role of STAT3 for embryonic stem cell pluripotency. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1999;96:2846–2851. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.6.2846. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Xu L., Ji J., Wang L., Pan J., Xiao M., Zhang C., Gan Y., Xie G., Tan M., Wang X., et al. LIF Promotes Sec15b-Mediated STAT3 Exosome Secretion to Maintain Stem Cell Pluripotency in Mouse Embryonic Development. Adv. Sci. 2024;11:e2407971. doi: 10.1002/advs.202407971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kiger A.A., Jones D.L., Schulz C., Rogers M.B., Fuller M.T. Stem cell self-renewal specified by JAK-STAT activation in response to a support cell cue. Science. 2001;294:2542–2545. doi: 10.1126/science.1066707. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Tulina N., Matunis E. Control of stem cell self-renewal in Drosophila spermatogenesis by JAK- STAT signaling. Science. 2001;294:2546–2549. doi: 10.1126/science.1066700. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Lopez-Onieva L., Fernandez-Minan A., Gonzalez-Reyes A. Jak/Stat signalling in niche support cells regulates dpp transcription to control germline stem cell maintenance in the Drosophila ovary. Development. 2008;135:533–540. doi: 10.1242/dev.016121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Issigonis M., Tulina N., de Cuevas M., Brawley C., Sandler L., Matunis E. JAK-STAT signal inhibition regulates competition in the Drosophila testis stem cell niche. Science. 2009;326:153–156. doi: 10.1126/science.1176817. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Singh S.R., Zheng Z., Wang H., Oh S.W., Chen X., Hou S.X. Competitiveness for the niche and mutual dependence of the germline and somatic stem cells in the Drosophila testis are regulated by the JAK/STAT signaling. J. Cell Physiol. 2010;223:500–510. doi: 10.1002/jcp.22073. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Vied C., Reilein A., Field N.S., Kalderon D. Regulation of stem cells by intersecting gradients of long-range niche signals. Dev. Cell. 2012;23:836–848. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2012.09.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Resende L.P., Jones D.L. Local signaling within stem cell niches: Insights from Drosophila. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2012;24:225–231. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2012.01.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Hombria J.C., Brown S. The fertile field of Drosophila Jak/STAT signalling. Curr. Biol. 2002;12:R569–R575. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(02)01057-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Melamed D., Kalderon D. Opposing JAK-STAT and Wnt signaling gradients define a stem cell domain by regulating differentiation at two borders. eLife. 2020;9:e61204. doi: 10.7554/eLife.61204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Matunis E.L., Stine R.R., de Cuevas M. Recent advances in Drosophila male germline stem cell biology. Spermatogenesis. 2012;2:137–144. doi: 10.4161/spmg.21763. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Stine R.R., Matunis E.L. JAK-STAT signaling in stem cells. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2013;786:247–267. doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-6621-1_14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Trivedi S., Starz-Gaiano M. Drosophila Jak/STAT Signaling: Regulation and Relevance in Human Cancer and Metastasis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018;19:4056. doi: 10.3390/ijms19124056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Herrera S.C., Bach E.A. JAK/STAT signaling in stem cells and regeneration: From. Development. 2019;146:dev167643. doi: 10.1242/dev.167643. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Vijayakumar Maya A., Neuhaus L., Nogay L., Singh A., Heckmann L., Grass I., Büscher J., Kierdorf K., Classen A.K. A JAK/STAT-Pdk1-S6K axis bypasses systemic growth restrictions to promote regeneration. Nat. Commun. 2025;16:10944. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-66995-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Cheng Y., Xu C., Lv D., Tian M., Wang H., Yang B., Chen L., You Q., Zhang S. JAK inhibitors alleviate EGFR-inhibitor-induced diarrhea by protecting intestinal stem cells from adaptive-immune-exacerbated injury. Nat. Commun. 2026 doi: 10.1038/s41467-026-71739-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Surbek M., Tse W., Moriggl R., Han X. A centric view of JAK/STAT5 in intestinal homeostasis, infection, and inflammation. Cytokine. 2021;139:155392. doi: 10.1016/j.cyto.2020.155392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Takashima S., Martin M.L., Jansen S.A., Fu Y., Bos J., Chandra D., O’Connor M.H., Mertelsmann A.M., Vinci P., Kuttiyara J., et al. T cell-derived interferon-γ programs stem cell death in immune-mediated intestinal damage. Sci. Immunol. 2019;4:eaay8556. doi: 10.1126/sciimmunol.aay8556. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Grusanovic S., Danek P., Kuzmina M., Adamcova M.K., Burocziova M., Mikyskova R., Vanickova K., Kosanovic S., Pokorna J., Reinis M., et al. Chronic inflammation decreases HSC fitness by activating the druggable Jak/Stat3 signaling pathway. EMBO Rep. 2023;24:e54729. doi: 10.15252/embr.202254729. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Goedhart M., Cornelissen A.S., Kuijk C., Geerman S., Kleijer M., van Buul J.D., Huveneers S., Raaijmakers M.H.G.P., Young H.A., Wolkers M.C., et al. Interferon-Gamma Impairs Maintenance and Alters Hematopoietic Support of Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stromal Cells. Stem Cells Dev. 2018;27:579–589. doi: 10.1089/scd.2017.0196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Ho L., Miller E.L., Ronan J.L., Ho W.Q., Jothi R., Crabtree G.R. esBAF facilitates pluripotency by conditioning the genome for LIF/STAT3 signalling and by regulating polycomb function. Nat. Cell Biol. 2011;13:903–913. doi: 10.1038/ncb2285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Carbognin E., Betto R.M., Soriano M.E., Smith A.G., Martello G. Stat3 promotes mitochondrial transcription and oxidative respiration during maintenance and induction of naive pluripotency. EMBO J. 2016;35:618–634. doi: 10.15252/embj.201592629. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Herrmann A., Lahtz C., Song J., Aftabizadeh M., Cherryholmes G.A., Xin H., Adamus T., Lee H., Grunert D., Armstrong B., et al. Integrin α6 signaling induces STAT3-TET3-mediated hydroxymethylation of genes critical for maintenance of glioma stem cells. Oncogene. 2020;39:2156–2169. doi: 10.1038/s41388-019-1134-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Williams M.J., Wang X., Bastos H.P., Grondys-Kotarba G., Wu Q., Jin S., Johnson C., Mende N., Calderbank E., Wantoch M., et al. Maintenance of hematopoietic stem cells by tyrosine-unphosphorylated STAT5 and JAK inhibition. Blood Adv. 2025;9:291–309. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2024014046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Li W.X. Canonical and non-canonical JAK-STAT signaling. Trends Cell Biol. 2008;18:545–551. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2008.08.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Shi S., Larson K., Guo D., Lim S.J., Dutta P., Yan S.J., Li W.X. Drosophila STAT is required for directly maintaining HP1 localization and heterochromatin stability. Nat. Cell Biol. 2008;10:489–496. doi: 10.1038/ncb1713. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Xing Y., Larson K., Li J., Li W.X. Canonical and non-canonical functions of STAT in germline stem cell maintenance. Dev. Dyn. 2023;252:728–741. doi: 10.1002/dvdy.576. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Xu N., Emelyanov A.V., Fyodorov D.V., Skoultchi A.I. Drosophila linker histone H1 coordinates STAT-dependent organization of heterochromatin and suppresses tumorigenesis caused by hyperactive JAK-STAT signaling. Epigenet. Chromatin. 2014;7:16. doi: 10.1186/1756-8935-7-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Samad M.A., Ahmad I., Hasan A., Alhashmi M.H., Ayub A., Al-Abbasi F.A., Kumer A., Tabrez S. STAT3 Signaling Pathway in Health and Disease. MedComm. 2025;6:e70152. doi: 10.1002/mco2.70152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Liu Z., Ren Y., Meng L., Li L., Beatson R., Deng J., Zhang T., Liu J., Han X. Epigenetic Signaling of Cancer Stem Cells During Inflammation. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2021;9:772211. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2021.772211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Godugu D., Chilamakuri R., Agarwal S. STAT3 axis in cancer and cancer stem cells: From oncogenesis to targeted therapies. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Rev. Cancer. 2025;1880:189461. doi: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2025.189461. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Hashimoto S., Hashimoto A., Muromoto R., Kitai Y., Oritani K., Matsuda T. Central Roles of STAT3-Mediated Signals in Onset and Development of Cancers: Tumorigenesis and Immunosurveillance. Cells. 2022;11:2618. doi: 10.3390/cells11162618. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Dakal T.C., Bhushan R., Xu C., Gadi B.R., Cameotra S.S., Yadav V., Maciaczyk J., Schmidt-Wolf I.G.H., Kumar A., Sharma A. Intricate relationship between cancer stemness, metastasis, and drug resistance. MedComm. 2024;5:e710. doi: 10.1002/mco2.710. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Polak K.L., Chernosky N.M., Smigiel J.M., Tamagno I., Jackson M.W. Balancing STAT Activity as a Therapeutic Strategy. Cancers. 2019;11:1716. doi: 10.3390/cancers11111716. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Wong G.L., Manore S.G., Doheny D.L., Lo H.W. STAT family of transcription factors in breast cancer: Pathogenesis and therapeutic opportunities and challenges. Semin. Cancer Biol. 2022;86:84–106. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2022.08.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Yu H., Kortylewski M., Pardoll D. Crosstalk between cancer and immune cells: Role of STAT3 in the tumour microenvironment. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2007;7:41–51. doi: 10.1038/nri1995. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Koppikar P., Lui V.W., Man D., Xi S., Chai R.L., Nelson E., Tobey A.B., Grandis J.R. Constitutive activation of signal transducer and activator of transcription 5 contributes to tumor growth, epithelial-mesenchymal transition, and resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor targeting. Clin. Cancer Res. 2008;14:7682–7690. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-1328. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Igelmann S., Neubauer H.A., Ferbeyre G. STAT3 and STAT5 Activation in Solid Cancers. Cancers. 2019;11:1428. doi: 10.3390/cancers11101428. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Thuya W.L., Cao Y., Ho P.C., Wong A.L., Wang L., Zhou J., Nicot C., Goh B.C. Insights into IL-6/JAK/STAT3 signaling in the tumor microenvironment: Implications for cancer therapy. Cytokine Growth Factor. Rev. 2025;85:26–42. doi: 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2025.01.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Zhou Q., Qi F., Zhou C., Ji J., Jiang J., Wang C., Zhao Q., Jin Y., Wu J., Cai Q., et al. VPS35 promotes gastric cancer progression through integrin/FAK/SRC signalling-mediated IL-6/STAT3 pathway activation in a YAP-dependent manner. Oncogene. 2024;43:106–122. doi: 10.1038/s41388-023-02885-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Shi J., Feng J., Xie J., Mei Z., Shi T., Wang S., Du Y., Yang G., Wu Y., Cheng X., et al. Targeted blockade of TGF-β and IL-6/JAK2/STAT3 pathways inhibits lung cancer growth promoted by bone marrow-derived myofibroblasts. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:8660. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-09020-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Spitschak A., Dhar P., Singh K.P., Casalegno Garduño R., Gupta S.K., Vera J., Musella L., Murr N., Stoll A., Pützer B.M. E2F1-induced autocrine IL-6 inflammatory loop mediates cancer-immune crosstalk that predicts T cell phenotype switching and therapeutic responsiveness. Front. Immunol. 2024;15:1470368. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1470368. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Sehl M.E., Shimada M., Landeros A., Lange K., Wicha M.S. Modeling of Cancer Stem Cell State Transitions Predicts Therapeutic Response. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0135797. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135797. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Tripathi S., Sharma Y., Kumar D. Unveiling the link between chronic inflammation and cancer. Metab. Open. 2025;25:100347. doi: 10.1016/j.metop.2025.100347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Haikarainen T., Virtanen A.T., Cravatt B.F., Silvennoinen O. Pharmacological targeting of the JAK-STAT pathway: New concepts and emerging indications. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2026;25:268–289. doi: 10.1038/s41573-025-01336-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Yang S., Wang L., Chuan Z., Nie J. STAT3 inhibitor in oncology: A trial-based analysis of translational challenges and evolving therapeutic paradigms. Front. Oncol. 2026;16:1802640. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2026.1802640. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Zhang X., Li P., Ma F., Wang T., Chu Q., Wei S., Xue C., Wang Z., Lu J. JAK-STAT signaling pathway in cancer: From molecular mechanisms to clinical intervention. Mol. Cancer. 2026;25:173. doi: 10.1186/s12943-026-02692-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Mohamed J., Ezat H., Abdelrahman R., Abdelaziz R., Ayman R., Oy E.K., Magar R.W. The JAK/STAT pathway: Key mechanism in gene activation, disease regulation, and emerging therapeutic targets. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2026;53:732. doi: 10.1007/s11033-026-11847-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Wang Y., Wang Z., Li S., Ma J., Dai X., Lu J. Deciphering JAK/STAT signaling pathway: A multifaceted approach to tumorigenesis, progression and therapeutic interventions. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2024;131:111846. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2024.111846. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Tanaka Y., Luo Y., O’Shea J.J., Nakayamada S. Janus kinase-targeting therapies in rheumatology: A mechanisms-based approach. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 2022;18:133–145. doi: 10.1038/s41584-021-00726-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Perner F., Pahl H.L., Zeiser R., Heidel F.H. Malignant JAK-signaling: At the interface of inflammation and malignant transformation. Leukemia. 2025;39:1011–1030. doi: 10.1038/s41375-025-02569-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Lv Y., Qi J., Babon J.J., Cao L., Fan G., Lang J., Zhang J., Mi P., Kobe B., Wang F. The JAK-STAT pathway: From structural biology to cytokine engineering. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2024;9:221. doi: 10.1038/s41392-024-01934-w. Correction in Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2024, 9, 290. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41392-024-01934-w . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Tesoriere A., Dinarello A., Argenton F. The Roles of Post-Translational Modifications in STAT3 Biological Activities and Functions. Biomedicines. 2021;9:956. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines9080956. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Seif F., Khoshmirsafa M., Aazami H., Mohsenzadegan M., Sedighi G., Bahar M. The role of JAK-STAT signaling pathway and its regulators in the fate of T helper cells. Cell Commun. Signal. 2017;15:23. doi: 10.1186/s12964-017-0177-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Cooney R.N. Suppressors of cytokine signaling (SOCS): Inhibitors of the JAK/STAT pathway. Shock. 2002;17:83–90. doi: 10.1097/00024382-200202000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Heinrich P.C., Behrmann I., Müller-Newen G., Schaper F., Graeve L. Interleukin-6-type cytokine signalling through the gp130/Jak/STAT pathway. Biochem. J. 1998;334:297–314. doi: 10.1042/bj3340297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Meier J.A., Larner A.C. Toward a new STATe: The role of STATs in mitochondrial function. Semin. Immunol. 2014;26:20–28. doi: 10.1016/j.smim.2013.12.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Avalle L., Camporeale A., Morciano G., Caroccia N., Ghetti E., Orecchia V., Viavattene D., Giorgi C., Pinton P., Poli V. STAT3 localizes to the ER, acting as a gatekeeper for ER-mitochondrion Ca. Cell Death Differ. 2019;26:932–942. doi: 10.1038/s41418-018-0171-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Brown S., Zeidler M.P. Unphosphorylated STATs go nuclear. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 2008;18:455–460. doi: 10.1016/j.gde.2008.09.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Hu X., Dutta P., Tsurumi A., Li J., Wang J., Land H., Li W.X. Unphosphorylated STAT5A stabilizes heterochromatin and suppresses tumor growth. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2013;110:10213–10218. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1221243110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Silver-Morse L., Li W.X. JAK-STAT in heterochromatin and genome stability. JAKSTAT. 2013;2:e26090. doi: 10.4161/jkst.26090. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Martello G., Smith A. The nature of embryonic stem cells. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2014;30:647–675. doi: 10.1146/annurev-cellbio-100913-013116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Burdon T., Smith A., Savatier P. Signalling, cell cycle and pluripotency in embryonic stem cells. Trends Cell Biol. 2002;12:432–438. doi: 10.1016/s0962-8924(02)02352-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Chen G., Yin S., Zeng H., Li H., Wan X. Regulation of Embryonic Stem Cell Self-Renewal. Life. 2022;12:1151. doi: 10.3390/life12081151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Hirai H., Karian P., Kikyo N. Regulation of embryonic stem cell self-renewal and pluripotency by leukaemia inhibitory factor. Biochem. J. 2011;438:11–23. doi: 10.1042/BJ20102152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Matsuda T., Nakamura T., Nakao K., Arai T., Katsuki M., Heike T., Yokota T. STAT3 activation is sufficient to maintain an undifferentiated state of mouse embryonic stem cells. EMBO J. 1999;18:4261–4269. doi: 10.1093/emboj/18.15.4261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Monteleone E., Corrieri P., Provero P., Viavattene D., Pulvirenti L., Raggi L., Carbognin E., Bianchi M.E., Martello G., Oliviero S., et al. STAT3-dependent long non-coding RNA Lncenc1 contributes to mouse ES cells pluripotency via stabilizing Klf4 mRNA. Brief. Funct. Genom. 2024;23:651–662. doi: 10.1093/bfgp/elad045. Correction in Brief. Funct. Genom. 2024, 23, 682. Correction in Brief. Funct. Genom. 2025, 24, elaf012. https://doi.org/10.1093/bfgp/elad045 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Chen H., Aksoy I., Gonnot F., Osteil P., Aubry M., Hamela C., Rognard C., Hochard A., Voisin S., Fontaine E., et al. Reinforcement of STAT3 activity reprogrammes human embryonic stem cells to naive-like pluripotency. Nat. Commun. 2015;6:7095. doi: 10.1038/ncomms8095. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Niwa H., Ogawa K., Shimosato D., Adachi K. A parallel circuit of LIF signalling pathways maintains pluripotency of mouse ES cells. Nature. 2009;460:118–122. doi: 10.1038/nature08113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Ying Q.L., Wray J., Nichols J., Batlle-Morera L., Doble B., Woodgett J., Cohen P., Smith A. The ground state of embryonic stem cell self-renewal. Nature. 2008;453:519–523. doi: 10.1038/nature06968. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Nakao S., Tsukamoto T., Ueyama T., Kawamura T. STAT3 for Cardiac Regenerative Medicine: Involvement in Stem Cell Biology, Pathophysiology, and Bioengineering. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020;21:1937. doi: 10.3390/ijms21061937. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Hanna J., Cheng A.W., Saha K., Kim J., Lengner C.J., Soldner F., Cassady J.P., Muffat J., Carey B.W., Jaenisch R. Human embryonic stem cells with biological and epigenetic characteristics similar to those of mouse ESCs. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2010;107:9222–9227. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1004584107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Semi K., Takashima Y. Pluripotent stem cells for the study of early human embryology. Dev. Growth Differ. 2021;63:104–115. doi: 10.1111/dgd.12715. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.van Oosten A.L., Costa Y., Smith A., Silva J.C. JAK/STAT3 signalling is sufficient and dominant over antagonistic cues for the establishment of naive pluripotency. Nat. Commun. 2012;3:817. doi: 10.1038/ncomms1822. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Tolomeo M., Cascio A. The Multifaced Role of STAT3 in Cancer and Its Implication for Anticancer Therapy. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021;22:603. doi: 10.3390/ijms22020603. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Biteau B., Hochmuth C.E., Jasper H. Maintaining tissue homeostasis: Dynamic control of somatic stem cell activity. Cell Stem Cell. 2011;9:402–411. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2011.10.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Fasouli E.S., Katsantoni E. JAK-STAT in Early Hematopoiesis and Leukemia. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2021;9:669363. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2021.669363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Brown G. Cell Lineage Affiliation During Hematopoiesis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025;26:3346. doi: 10.3390/ijms26073346. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Iwasaki H., Akashi K. Myeloid lineage commitment from the hematopoietic stem cell. Immunity. 2007;26:726–740. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2007.06.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Staerk J., Constantinescu S.N. The JAK-STAT pathway and hematopoietic stem cells from the JAK2 V617F perspective. JAKSTAT. 2012;1:184–190. doi: 10.4161/jkst.22071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Pallard C., Gouilleux F., Bénit L., Cocault L., Souyri M., Levy D., Groner B., Gisselbrecht S., Dusanter-Fourt I. Thrombopoietin activates a STAT5-like factor in hematopoietic cells. EMBO J. 1995;14:2847–2856. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1995.tb07284.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Wang Z., Bunting K.D. STAT5 in hematopoietic stem cell biology and transplantation. JAKSTAT. 2013;2:e27159. doi: 10.4161/jkst.27159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Smith M.R., Satter L.R.F., Vargas-Hernández A. STAT5b: A master regulator of key biological pathways. Front. Immunol. 2022;13:1025373. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1025373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Mullally A., Lane S.W., Ball B., Megerdichian C., Okabe R., Al-Shahrour F., Paktinat M., Haydu J.E., Housman E., Lord A.M., et al. Physiological Jak2V617F expression causes a lethal myeloproliferative neoplasm with differential effects on hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells. Cancer Cell. 2010;17:584–596. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2010.05.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Xing Y., Li W.X. Heterochromatin components in germline stem cell maintenance. Sci. Rep. 2015;5:17463. doi: 10.1038/srep17463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.de Morree A., Rando T.A. Regulation of adult stem cell quiescence and its functions in the maintenance of tissue integrity. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2023;24:334–354. doi: 10.1038/s41580-022-00568-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Xu Y., Lee M.K.S., de Weerd N.A., Fu Z., Bertuzzo Veiga C., Dragoljevic D., Sviridov D., Hertzog P.J., Fleetwood A.J., Murphy A.J. Type I interferon signaling controls the early hematopoietic expansion in response to β-glucan. iScience. 2025;28:112347. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2025.112347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Ho N.P., Takizawa H. Inflammation Regulates Haematopoietic Stem Cells and Their Niche. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022;23:1125. doi: 10.3390/ijms23031125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Khlusov I., Litvinova L., Efimenko A. Stem Cell Niche Concept: Search for Current Expert Consensus. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025;26:8422. doi: 10.3390/ijms26178422. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Greenbaum A., Hsu Y.M., Day R.B., Schuettpelz L.G., Christopher M.J., Borgerding J.N., Nagasawa T., Link D.C. CXCL12 in early mesenchymal progenitors is required for haematopoietic stem-cell maintenance. Nature. 2013;495:227–230. doi: 10.1038/nature11926. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Wei Q., Frenette P.S. Niches for Hematopoietic Stem Cells and Their Progeny. Immunity. 2018;48:632–648. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2018.03.024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Guenin-Mace L., Konieczny P., Naik S. Immune-Epithelial Cross Talk in Regeneration and Repair. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2023;41:207–228. doi: 10.1146/annurev-immunol-101721-062818. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Maciag G., Hansen S.L., Krizic K., Kellermann L., Inventor Zøylner M.J., Ulyanchenko S., Maimets M., Baattrup A.M., Riis L.B., Khodosevich K., et al. JAK/STAT signaling promotes the emergence of unique cell states in ulcerative colitis. Stem Cell Rep. 2024;19:1172–1188. doi: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2024.06.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Torrisi F., Denaro S., Ragonese J., D’Aprile S., Zappalà A., Parenti R. Neural stem cells fate under neuroinflammatory conditions and oxidative stress response. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2025;19:1736865. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2025.1736865. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Hu Q., Bian Q., Rong D., Wang L., Song J., Huang H.S., Zeng J., Mei J., Wang P.Y. JAK/STAT pathway: Extracellular signals, diseases, immunity, and therapeutic regimens. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2023;11:1110765. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1110765. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Fuchs E., Blau H.M. Tissue Stem Cells: Architects of Their Niches. Cell Stem Cell. 2020;27:532–556. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2020.09.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Yushkov B., Chereshnev V., Korneva E., Yushkova V., Sarapultsev A. Stem-Cell Niches in Health and Disease: Microenvironmental Determinants of Regeneration and Pathology. Cells. 2025;14:981. doi: 10.3390/cells14130981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Jeffery V., Goldson A.J., Dainty J.R., Chieppa M., Sobolewski A. IL-6 Signaling Regulates Small Intestinal Crypt Homeostasis. J. Immunol. 2017;199:304–311. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1600960. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Kummer K.K., Zeidler M., Kalpachidou T., Kress M. Role of IL-6 in the regulation of neuronal development, survival and function. Cytokine. 2021;144:155582. doi: 10.1016/j.cyto.2021.155582. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Tadokoro T., Wang Y., Barak L.S., Bai Y., Randell S.H., Hogan B.L. IL-6/STAT3 promotes regeneration of airway ciliated cells from basal stem cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2014;111:E3641–E3649. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1409781111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Jiang H., Patel P.H., Kohlmaier A., Grenley M.O., McEwen D.G., Edgar B.A. Cytokine/Jak/Stat signaling mediates regeneration and homeostasis in the Drosophila midgut. Cell. 2009;137:1343–1355. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.05.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Bausek N. JAK-STAT signaling in stem cells and their niches in Drosophila. JAKSTAT. 2013;2:e25686. doi: 10.4161/jkst.25686. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Sinden D., Badgett M., Fry J., Jones T., Palmen R., Sheng X., Simmons A., Matunis E., Wawersik M. Jak-STAT regulation of cyst stem cell development in the Drosophila testis. Dev. Biol. 2012;372:5–16. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2012.09.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Arbouzova N.I., Zeidler M.P. JAK/STAT signalling in Drosophila: Insights into conserved regulatory and cellular functions. Development. 2006;133:2605–2616. doi: 10.1242/dev.02411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Sheng X.R., Posenau T., Gumulak-Smith J.J., Matunis E., Van Doren M., Wawersik M. Jak-STAT regulation of male germline stem cell establishment during Drosophila embryogenesis. Dev. Biol. 2009;334:335–344. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2009.07.031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Dorn D.C., Dorn A. Stem cell autotomy and niche interaction in different systems. World J. Stem Cells. 2015;7:922–944. doi: 10.4252/wjsc.v7.i6.922. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.O’Brien L.E., Bilder D. Beyond the niche: Tissue-level coordination of stem cell dynamics. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2013;29:107–136. doi: 10.1146/annurev-cellbio-101512-122319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Sarkar H., Lee E., Lopez-Darwin S.L., Kang Y. Deciphering normal and cancer stem cell niches by spatial transcriptomics: Opportunities and challenges. Genes. Dev. 2025;39:64–85. doi: 10.1101/gad.351956.124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Pinho S., Frenette P.S. Haematopoietic stem cell activity and interactions with the niche. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2019;20:303–320. doi: 10.1038/s41580-019-0103-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Hofmann J., Kokkaliaris K.D. Bone marrow niches for hematopoietic stem cells: Life span dynamics and adaptation to acute stress. Blood. 2024;144:21–34. doi: 10.1182/blood.2023023788. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Fiore V.F., Almagro J., Fuchs E. Shaping epithelial tissues by stem cell mechanics in development and cancer. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2025;26:442–455. doi: 10.1038/s41580-024-00821-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Xin T., Greco V., Myung P. Hardwiring Stem Cell Communication through Tissue Structure. Cell. 2016;164:1212–1225. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.02.041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Xu N., Wang S.Q., Tan D., Gao Y., Lin G., Xi R. EGFR, Wingless and JAK/STAT signaling cooperatively maintain Drosophila intestinal stem cells. Dev. Biol. 2011;354:31–43. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2011.03.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Shaw R.L., Kohlmaier A., Polesello C., Veelken C., Edgar B.A., Tapon N. The Hippo pathway regulates intestinal stem cell proliferation during Drosophila adult midgut regeneration. Development. 2010;137:4147–4158. doi: 10.1242/dev.052506. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Li W.X. Computational simulation of JAK/STAT signaling in somatic versus germline stem cells. Dev. Dyn. 2024;253:648–658. doi: 10.1002/dvdy.684. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Kong R., Zhao H., Li J., Ma Y., Li N., Shi L., Li Z. A regulatory loop of JAK/STAT signalling and its downstream targets represses cell fate conversion and maintains male germline stem cell niche homeostasis. Cell Prolif. 2024;57:e13648. doi: 10.1111/cpr.13648. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Takubo K., Nagamatsu G., Kobayashi C.I., Nakamura-Ishizu A., Kobayashi H., Ikeda E., Goda N., Rahimi Y., Johnson R.S., Soga T., et al. Regulation of glycolysis by Pdk functions as a metabolic checkpoint for cell cycle quiescence in hematopoietic stem cells. Cell Stem Cell. 2013;12:49–61. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2012.10.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Coller H.A. The paradox of metabolism in quiescent stem cells. FEBS Lett. 2019;593:2817–2839. doi: 10.1002/1873-3468.13608. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Du Y., Gupta P., Qin S., Sieber M. The role of metabolism in cellular quiescence. J. Cell Sci. 2023;136:jcs260787. doi: 10.1242/jcs.260787. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Morganti C., Cabezas-Wallscheid N., Ito K. Metabolic Regulation of Hematopoietic Stem Cells. Hemasphere. 2022;6:e740. doi: 10.1097/HS9.0000000000000740. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Fernando C.D., Jayasekara W.S.N., Inampudi C., Kohonen-Corish M.R.J., Cooper W.A., Beilharz T.H., Josephs T.M., Garama D.J., Gough D.J. A STAT3 protein complex required for mitochondrial mRNA stability and cancer. Cell Rep. 2023;42:113033. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2023.113033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Tošić I., Frank D.A. STAT3 as a mediator of oncogenic cellular metabolism: Pathogenic and therapeutic implications. Neoplasia. 2021;23:1167–1178. doi: 10.1016/j.neo.2021.10.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Yu Z., Dmitrieva N.I., Walts A.D., Jin H., Liu Y., Ping X., Ferrante E.A., Qiu L., Holland S.M., Freeman A.F., et al. STAT3 modulates reprogramming efficiency of human somatic cells; insights from autosomal dominant Hyper IgE syndrome caused by STAT3 mutations. Biol. Open. 2020;9:bio052662. doi: 10.1242/bio.052662. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Tang Y., Tian X.C. JAK-STAT3 and somatic cell reprogramming. JAKSTAT. 2013;2:e24935. doi: 10.4161/jkst.24935. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Yan S.J., Lim S.J., Shi S., Dutta P., Li W.X. Unphosphorylated STAT and heterochromatin protect genome stability. FASEB J. 2011;25:232–241. doi: 10.1096/fj.10-169367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Ramirez Moreno M., Quinton A., Jacobsen E., Stempor P.A., Zeidler M.P., Bulgakova N.A. E-cadherin endocytosis promotes non-canonical EGFR:STAT signalling to induce cell death and inhibit heterochromatinisation. PLoS Genet. 2025;21:e1011781. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1011781. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Dutta P., Zhang L., Zhang H., Peng Q., Montgrain P.R., Wang Y., Song Y., Li J., Li W.X. Unphosphorylated STAT3 in heterochromatin formation and tumor suppression in lung cancer. BMC Cancer. 2020;20:145. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-6649-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.James C., Ugo V., Le Couedic J.P., Staerk J., Delhommeau F., Lacout C., Garcon L., Raslova H., Berger R., Bennaceur-Griscelli A., et al. A unique clonal JAK2 mutation leading to constitutive signalling causes polycythaemia vera. Nature. 2005;434:1144–1148. doi: 10.1038/nature03546. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Merchant S. The JAK2 mutation. Int. Rev. Cell Mol. Biol. 2021;365:117–162. doi: 10.1016/bs.ircmb.2021.09.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Zhai X., Jiang X. Properties of Leukemic Stem Cells in Regulating Drug Resistance in Acute and Chronic Myeloid Leukemias. Biomedicines. 2022;10:1841. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10081841. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Lee S., Wong H., Castiglione M., Murphy M., Kaushansky K., Zhan H. JAK2V617F Mutant Megakaryocytes Contribute to Hematopoietic Aging in a Murine Model of Myeloproliferative Neoplasm. Stem Cells. 2022;40:359–370. doi: 10.1093/stmcls/sxac005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Dutta P., Sabri N., Li J., Li W.X. Role of STAT3 in lung cancer. JAKSTAT. 2014;3:e999503. doi: 10.1080/21623996.2014.999503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Li P., Huang D. Targeting the JAK-STAT pathway in colorectal cancer: Mechanisms, clinical implications, and therapeutic potential. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2024;12:1507621. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2024.1507621. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Wang M.L., Chiou S.H., Wu C.W. Targeting cancer stem cells: Emerging role of Nanog transcription factor. OncoTargets Ther. 2013;6:1207–1220. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S38114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Yu H., Pardoll D., Jove R. STATs in cancer inflammation and immunity: A leading role for STAT3. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2009;9:798–809. doi: 10.1038/nrc2734. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149.Shastri A., Choudhary G., Teixeira M., Gordon-Mitchell S., Ramachandra N., Bernard L., Bhattacharyya S., Lopez R., Pradhan K., Giricz O., et al. Antisense STAT3 inhibitor decreases viability of myelodysplastic and leukemic stem cells. J. Clin. Investig. 2018;128:5479–5488. doi: 10.1172/JCI120156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150.Kortylewski M., Xin H., Kujawski M., Lee H., Liu Y., Harris T., Drake C., Pardoll D., Yu H. Regulation of the IL-23 and IL-12 balance by Stat3 signaling in the tumor microenvironment. Cancer Cell. 2009;15:114–123. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2008.12.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151.Sang H., Zhao X. JAK/STAT-mediated regulation of PD-L1 expression in breast cancer: Molecular mechanisms and implications for immunotherapy. iScience. 2026;29:114826. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2026.114826. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152.Yao Y., Tao G., Xie D., Xu Y., Li L. Effect of JAK/STAT signaling on anti-PD-L1 immunotherapy efficacy in lung cancer. Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol. 2025;214:104861. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2025.104861. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153.Rah B., Rather R.A., Bhat G.R., Baba A.B., Mushtaq I., Farooq M., Yousuf T., Dar S.B., Parveen S., Hassan R., et al. JAK/STAT Signaling: Molecular Targets, Therapeutic Opportunities, and Limitations of Targeted Inhibitions in Solid Malignancies. Front. Pharmacol. 2022;13:821344. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.821344. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154.Xue C., Yao Q., Gu X., Shi Q., Yuan X., Chu Q., Bao Z., Lu J., Li L. Evolving cognition of the JAK-STAT signaling pathway: Autoimmune disorders and cancer. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2023;8:204. doi: 10.1038/s41392-023-01468-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155.Borcherding D.C., He K., Amin N.V., Hirbe A.C. TYK2 in Cancer Metastases: Genomic and Proteomic Discovery. Cancers. 2021;13:4171. doi: 10.3390/cancers13164171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156.Dai R., Lou N., Zheng X., Han X. Development Trends of Janus Kinase Inhibitors (JAKi) Over Three Decades: From Common to Rare Diseases. Drug Des. Dev. Ther. 2026;20:597046. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S597046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157.Wu Z., Lian G., He L., Hu P., Guo Y., Su Z. Targeting JAK-STAT signaling for autoimmune diseases: Current understanding, clinical advances, and emerging directions. Immunol. Cell Biol. 2026;104:172–191. doi: 10.1111/imcb.70078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158.Shawky A.M., Almalki F.A., Abdalla A.N., Abdelazeem A.H., Gouda A.M. A Comprehensive Overview of Globally Approved JAK Inhibitors. Pharmaceutics. 2022;14:1001. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14051001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159.Karunakar K.K., Cheriyan B.V., Philiph S., Shanmugam R.K., Sree J. Next-generation Janus kinase inhibitors: Integrating synthetic innovation, structural biology, and computational design for precision drug discovery. Pharm. Sci. Adv. 2026;4:100116. doi: 10.1016/j.pscia.2026.100116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160.Vainchenker W., Leroy E., Gilles L., Marty C., Plo I., Constantinescu S.N. JAK inhibitors for the treatment of myeloproliferative neoplasms and other disorders. F1000Research. 2018;7:82. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.13167.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 161.Thaw K., Harrison C.N., Sriskandarajah P. JAK Inhibitors for Myelofibrosis: Strengths and Limitations. Curr. Hematol. Malig. Rep. 2024;19:264–275. doi: 10.1007/s11899-024-00744-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 162.Grockowiak E., Korn C., Rak J., Lysenko V., Hallou A., Panvini F.M., Williams M., Fielding C., Fang Z., Khatib-Massalha E., et al. Different niches for stem cells carrying the same oncogenic driver affect pathogenesis and therapy response in myeloproliferative neoplasms. Nat. Cancer. 2023;4:1193–1209. doi: 10.1038/s43018-023-00607-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 163.Short W.D., Steen E., Kaul A., Wang X., Olutoye O.O., Vangapandu H.V., Templeman N., Blum A.J., Moles C.M., Narmoneva D.A., et al. IL-10 promotes endothelial progenitor cell infiltration and wound healing via STAT3. FASEB J. 2022;36:e22298. doi: 10.1096/fj.201901024RR. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 164.Pickert G., Neufert C., Leppkes M., Zheng Y., Wittkopf N., Warntjen M., Lehr H.A., Hirth S., Weigmann B., Wirtz S., et al. STAT3 links IL-22 signaling in intestinal epithelial cells to mucosal wound healing. J. Exp. Med. 2009;206:1465–1472. doi: 10.1084/jem.20082683. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 165.Richmond C.A., Rickner H., Shah M.S., Ediger T., Deary L., Zhou F., Tovaglieri A., Carlone D.L., Breault D.T. JAK/STAT-1 Signaling Is Required for Reserve Intestinal Stem Cell Activation during Intestinal Regeneration Following Acute Inflammation. Stem Cell Rep. 2018;10:17–26. doi: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2017.11.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 166.Fernández-Clotet A., Castro-Poceiro J., Panés J. Tofacitinib for the treatment of ulcerative colitis. Expert. Rev. Clin. Immunol. 2018;14:881–892. doi: 10.1080/1744666X.2018.1532291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 167.Vieujean S., Laharie D., Buisson A., Roblin X., Fumery M., Nancey S., Wils P., Altwegg R., Seidel L., Caron B., et al. Histological healing induced by tofacitinib in ulcerative colitis: A multicentre study. Dig. Liver Dis. 2024;56:613–621. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2023.11.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 168.Cressman D.E., Greenbaum L.E., DeAngelis R.A., Ciliberto G., Furth E.E., Poli V., Taub R. Liver failure and defective hepatocyte regeneration in interleukin-6-deficient mice. Science. 1996;274:1379–1383. doi: 10.1126/science.274.5291.1379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 169.Moh A., Iwamoto Y., Chai G.X., Zhang S.S., Kano A., Yang D.D., Zhang W., Wang J., Jacoby J.J., Gao B., et al. Role of STAT3 in liver regeneration: Survival, DNA synthesis, inflammatory reaction and liver mass recovery. Lab. Investig. 2007;87:1018–1028. doi: 10.1038/labinvest.3700630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 170.Hora S., Wuestefeld T. Liver Injury and Regeneration: Current Understanding, New Approaches, and Future Perspectives. Cells. 2023;12:2129. doi: 10.3390/cells12172129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 171.Xiao T., Jin Z., Deng J., Meng W. Liver regeneration: Cytokine regulation targeting hepatocytes and beyond. Life Med. 2026;5:lnag004. doi: 10.1093/lifemedi/lnag004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 172.Bareyre F.M., Garzorz N., Lang C., Misgeld T., Büning H., Kerschensteiner M. In vivo imaging reveals a phase-specific role of STAT3 during central and peripheral nervous system axon regeneration. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2011;108:6282–6287. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1015239108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 173.Benito C., Davis C.M., Gomez-Sanchez J.A., Turmaine M., Meijer D., Poli V., Mirsky R., Jessen K.R. STAT3 Controls the Long-Term Survival and Phenotype of Repair Schwann Cells during Nerve Regeneration. J. Neurosci. 2017;37:4255–4269. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3481-16.2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 174.Castelo-Soccio L., Kim H., Gadina M., Schwartzberg P.L., Laurence A., O’Shea J.J. Protein kinases: Drug targets for immunological disorders. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2023;23:787–806. doi: 10.1038/s41577-023-00877-7. Correction in Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2024, 24, 79. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41577-023-00877-7 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 175.Sabaawy H.E., Ryan B.M., Khiabanian H., Pine S.R. JAK/STAT of all trades: Linking inflammation with cancer development, tumor progression and therapy resistance. Carcinogenesis. 2021;42:1411–1419. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgab075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 176.Lynch D.M., Forrester B., Webb T., Ciulli A. Unravelling the druggability and immunological roles of the SOCS-family proteins. Front. Immunol. 2024;15:1449397. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1449397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 177.Bao K., Li P., Gao D. Novel inhibitors of STAT3: An updated patent review (2022-present) Expert. Opin. Ther. Pat. 2025;35:695–717. doi: 10.1080/13543776.2025.2494857. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 178.Hua Y., Yuan X., Shen Y.H., Wang J., Azeem W., Yang S., Gade A., Lellahi S.M., Øyan A.M., Ke X., et al. Novel STAT3 Inhibitors Targeting STAT3 Dimerization by Binding to the STAT3 SH2 Domain. Front. Pharmacol. 2022;13:836724. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.836724. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 179.Marié I.J., Lahiri T., Önder Ö., Elenitoba-Johnson K.S.J., Levy D.E. Structural determinants of mitochondrial STAT3 targeting and function. Mitochondrial Commun. 2024;2:1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.mitoco.2024.01.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 180.Zhang K.Y., Zhu X.Z., Yan Y.X., Ying X.H., Zhang J., Wang Z.H. Tumor evolution: Signaling pathways, molecular mechanisms and therapeutic targets. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2026;11:280. doi: 10.1038/s41392-026-02850-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 181.Cui Z., Wei H., Goding C., Cui R. Stem cell heterogeneity, plasticity, and regulation. Life Sci. 2023;334:122240. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2023.122240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 182.Kirschner K., Chandra T., Kiselev V., Flores-Santa Cruz D., Macaulay I.C., Park H.J., Li J., Kent D.G., Kumar R., Pask D.C., et al. Proliferation Drives Aging-Related Functional Decline in a Subpopulation of the Hematopoietic Stem Cell Compartment. Cell Rep. 2017;19:1503–1511. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.04.074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 183.Zhong Y., Cui S., Yang Y., Cai J.J. Controlled noise: Evidence of epigenetic regulation of single-cell expression variability. Bioinformatics. 2024;40:btae457. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btae457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 184.Loach M., Naghsh Nilchi A., Chiang D., Howells M., Heyl F., Rasche H., Jakiela J., Tekman M., Gamal M., Moreno P., et al. Galaxy single-cell & spatial omics community update: Navigating new frontiers in 2025. Cell Genom. 2025;5:101005. doi: 10.1016/j.xgen.2025.101005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 185.Maynard K.R., Collado-Torres L., Weber L.M., Uytingco C., Barry B.K., Williams S.R., Catallini J.L., Tran M.N., Besich Z., Tippani M., et al. Transcriptome-scale spatial gene expression in the human dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Nat. Neurosci. 2021;24:425–436. doi: 10.1038/s41593-020-00787-0. Correction in Nat. Neurosci. 2021, 24, 612. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-020-00787-0 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 186.See J.E., Liu Y., Plummer J. Spatial omics of immunity: Mapping cellular landscapes in tissue microenvironments. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 2026;101:102790. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2026.102790. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 187.Kudo T., Meireles A.M., Moncada R., Chen Y., Wu P., Gould J., Hu X., Kornfeld O., Jesudason R., Foo C., et al. Multiplexed, image-based pooled screens in primary cells and tissues with PerturbView. Nat. Biotechnol. 2025;43:1091–1100. doi: 10.1038/s41587-024-02391-0. Correction in Nat. Biotechnol. 2025, 43, 1202. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-024-02391-0 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 188.Gambin A., Charzyńska A., Ellert-Miklaszewska A., Rybiński M. Computational models of the JAK1/2-STAT1 signaling. JAKSTAT. 2013;2:e24672. doi: 10.4161/jkst.24672. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 189.Toni T., Stumpf M.P. Parameter inference and model selection in signaling pathway models. Methods Mol. Biol. 2010;673:283–295. doi: 10.1007/978-1-60761-842-3_18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 190.Chang W., Zhang W., Li K., Huang P. Integrative spatial multi-omics reveals the tumor ecosystem: From mechanistic insights to therapeutic strategies. iScience. 2026;29:116349. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2026.116349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.


Articles from International Journal of Molecular Sciences are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES