Skip to main content
PMC home page
The British Journal of General Practice logoLink to The British Journal of General Practice
. 1991 Mar;41(344):97–99.

Assessment of the performance of general practitioners by the use of standardized (simulated) patients.

J J Rethans 1, F Sturmans 1, R Drop 1, C van der Vleuten 1
PMCID: PMC1371620  PMID: 2031767

Abstract

A study was undertaken whereby a set of standardized (simulated) patients visited general practitioners without being detected, in a health care system where doctors had fixed patient lists. Thirty nine general practitioners were each visited during normal surgery hours by four standardized patients who were designed to be indistinguishable from real patients. The objective of the study was to see whether the actual performance of general practitioners, as assessed by standardized patients, met predetermined consensus standards of care for actual practice. The patients presented standardized accounts of headache, diarrhoea, shoulder pain and diabetes. The mean group scores of the doctors on the predefined standards of care for the different complaints ranged from 33 to 68%. The results show that standardized patients may be the method of choice in the assessment of the quality of actual care of doctors. It is hypothesized that the substandard scores of the doctors do not reflect inadequate competence, but are a result of the difference between competence and performance.

Full text

PDF
99

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Fessel W. J., Van Brunt E. E. Assessing quality of care from the medical record. N Engl J Med. 1972 Jan 20;286(3):134–138. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197201202860305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Gonnella J. S., Goran M. J., Williamson J. W., Cotsonas N. J., Jr Evaluation of patient care. An approach. JAMA. 1970 Dec 14;214(11):2040–2043. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Haynes R. B., Davis D. A., McKibbon A., Tugwell P. A critical appraisal of the efficacy of continuing medical education. JAMA. 1984 Jan 6;251(1):61–64. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Maguire P. Assessing clinical competence. BMJ. 1989 Jan 7;298(6665):4–5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.298.6665.4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. McClure C. L., Gall E. P., Meredith K. E., Gooden M. A., Boyer J. T. Assessing clinical judgment with standardized patients. J Fam Pract. 1985 May;20(5):457–464. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Mok J. HIV infection in children. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1988 Aug;38(313):342–344. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Norman G. R., Neufeld V. R., Walsh A., Woodward C. A., McConvey G. A. Measuring physicians' performances by using simulated patients. J Med Educ. 1985 Dec;60(12):925–934. doi: 10.1097/00001888-198512000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Rethans J. J., Drop R., Sturmans F., van der Vleuten C. A method for introducing standardized (simulated) patients into general practice consultations. Br J Gen Pract. 1991 Mar;41(344):94–96. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Rethans J. J., van Boven C. P. Simulated patients in general practice: a different look at the consultation. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1987 Mar 28;294(6575):809–812. doi: 10.1136/bmj.294.6575.809. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Rethans J. J., van Leeuwen Y., Drop R., van der Vleuten C., Sturmans F. Competence and performance: two different concepts in the assessment of quality of medical care. Fam Pract. 1990 Sep;7(3):168–174. doi: 10.1093/fampra/7.3.168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Sibley J. C., Sackett D. L., Neufeld V., Gerrard B., Rudnick K. V., Fraser W. A randomized trial of continuing medical education. N Engl J Med. 1982 Mar 4;306(9):511–515. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198203043060904. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The British Journal of General Practice are provided here courtesy of Royal College of General Practitioners

RESOURCES