Skip to main content
The British Journal of General Practice logoLink to The British Journal of General Practice
. 1991 Jul;41(348):293–294.

How well do family practitioner committee and general practice records agree? Experience in a semi-rural practice.

S N Voss 1, H F Thomas 1
PMCID: PMC1371691  PMID: 1747269

Abstract

General practice notes may be inaccurate for various reasons. A study was carried out in one semi-rural practice to investigate the agreement between records held by the family practitioner committee and those kept in the practice. Details on the practice notes and the family practitioner committee list were compared for 800 patients. The details examined included name, sex, date of birth, address and National Health Service number. While 58% of records agreed, discrepancies occurred in 339 records (42%). The most common discrepancies concerned the patient's address (30.6%), date of birth (9.4%) and NHS number (8.0%). Nearly 5% of the practice notes appeared to be for patients who were no longer on the practice list or dependent on its care. These findings have implications under the new general practitioner contract where screening programmes, target related payments, and increased capitation fees require accurate practice records.

Full text

PDF
293

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Armstrong E. M. The politics of inadequate registers. BMJ. 1989 Jul 8;299(6691):73–73. doi: 10.1136/bmj.299.6691.73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Baker R. The accuracy of a practice-based immunisation register. Practitioner. 1988 Jun 8;232(1450):681–683. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Difford F., Hook P. M., Sledge M. Maintaining the accuracy of a computer practice register: household index. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1985 Feb 16;290(6467):519–521. doi: 10.1136/bmj.290.6467.519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Fraser R. C., Clayton D. G. The accuracy of age-sex registers, practice medical records and family practitioner committee registers. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1981 Jul;31(228):410–419. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Fraser R. C. Patient movements and the accuracy of the age--sex register. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1982;32(243):615–622. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Fraser R. C. The reliability and validity of the age-sex register as a population denominator in general practice. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1978 May;28(190):283–286. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Sheldon M. G., Rector A. L., Barnes P. A. The accuracy of age-sex registers in general practice. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1984 May;34(262):269–271. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The British Journal of General Practice are provided here courtesy of Royal College of General Practitioners

RESOURCES