Skip to main content
PMC home page
The British Journal of General Practice logoLink to The British Journal of General Practice
. 1991 Aug;41(349):315–319.

Factors influencing waiting times and consultation times in general practice.

D J Heaney 1, J G Howie 1, A M Porter 1
PMCID: PMC1371752  PMID: 1777274

Abstract

Using data collected from 85 general practitioners in Lothian, large variations were found in the time patients wait for and spend with their doctor. This study, which sets consultations into their administrative framework, examines factors which cause this variation. Consultation time was found to be affected by the total number of patients attending a particular surgery, while waiting time was found to be affected by an individual patient's place within that surgery queue. Taking these two results together suggests that patients seen at the end of large surgeries are likely to get a different service from their doctor than they would have done earlier in the session, or when attending a less busy surgery. Possible strategies are discussed for reducing average waiting times, thereby decreasing the relative cost of consultation to patients.

Full text

PDF
319

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Butler J. R., Calnan M. W. List sizes and use of time in general practice. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1987 Nov 28;295(6610):1383–1386. doi: 10.1136/bmj.295.6610.1383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Harrison A. T. Appointment systems: feasibility study of a new approach. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1987 Jun 6;294(6585):1465–1466. doi: 10.1136/bmj.294.6585.1465. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Hill-Smith I. Mathematical relationship between waiting times and appointment interval for doctor and patients. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1989 Dec;39(329):492–494. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Howie J. G., Porter A. M., Forbes J. F. Quality and the use of time in general practice: widening the discussion. BMJ. 1989 Apr 15;298(6679):1008–1010. doi: 10.1136/bmj.298.6679.1008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Howie J. G., Porter A. M., Heaney D. J., Hopton J. L. Long to short consultation ratio: a proxy measure of quality of care for general practice. Br J Gen Pract. 1991 Feb;41(343):48–54. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hughes D. Consultation length and outcome in two group general practices. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1983 Mar;33(248):143–147. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hull F. M., Hull F. S. Time and the general practitioner: the patient's view. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1984 Feb;34(259):71–75. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Knight R. The importance of list size and consultation length as factors in general practice. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1987 Jan;37(294):19–22. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Lowenthal L., Bingham E. Length of consultation: how well do patient's choose? J R Coll Gen Pract. 1987 Nov;37(304):498–499. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Marshall E. I. Waiting for the doctor. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1986 Apr 12;292(6526):993–995. doi: 10.1136/bmj.292.6526.993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Morrell D. C., Evans M. E., Morris R. W., Roland M. O. The "five minute" consultation: effect of time constraint on clinical content and patient satisfaction. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1986 Mar 29;292(6524):870–873. doi: 10.1136/bmj.292.6524.870. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Raynes N. V., Cairns V. Factors contributing to the length of general practice consultations. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1980 Aug;30(217):496–498. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Ridsdale L., Carruthers M., Morris R., Ridsdale J. Study of the effect of time availability on the consultation. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1989 Dec;39(329):488–491. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Wilkin D., Metcalfe D. H. List size and patient contact in general medical practice. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1984 Dec 1;289(6457):1501–1505. doi: 10.1136/bmj.289.6457.1501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The British Journal of General Practice are provided here courtesy of Royal College of General Practitioners

RESOURCES