Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2026 Nov 4.
Published in final edited form as: Circ Res. 2026 Jul 30;139(4):e327684. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.126.327684

Single Cell Proteomics to Spatial Multiomics in Cardiovascular Disease: Foundations, Technologies, and Biological Insights

Aleksandra Binek 1, Peggi M Angel 2
PMCID: PMC13730397  NIHMSID: NIHMS2191220  PMID: 42531358

Abstract

It is now apparent that cardiac form and function are governed at a systems level by an integrated collective of heterogeneous single-cell programs that together regulate tissue homeostasis, drive disease emergence, and shape individualized responses to therapy. Current advances in single-cell proteomics (SCP) and spatial multiomics by mass spectrometry imaging (MSI) allow systematic dissection of clinically defined cardiovascular tissues with an unprecedented molecular resolving power, yet remain relatively under-utilized in cardiovascular research. This compendium review works to stimulate new research into spatial regulation of the heart, emphasizing integration of single cell proteomic regulation with comprehensive multiomic MSI studies. In this context, we outline conceptual foundations, technological innovations, and biological insights that have resulted in the current success of single-cell proteomic and spatial multiomic analyses in cardiovascular disease. We provide an experimental design knowledgebase of critical components in SCP and spatial workflows by MSI, essential for generating robust and reproducible datasets that are interpretable by advanced computational methods. Key cardiovascular discoveries by single-cell proteomics and multiomic MSI are reviewed, highlighting how these approaches have provided new molecular insights into cardiac cell programming.

Subject Terms: Cardiovascular Disease, Proteomics

Introduction

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains the single largest contributor to global morbidity and mortality1,2. CVD impacted global disease burden with 19.2 million deaths in 2023 and in the same year accounted for 437 million disability-adjusted life years1. The global disease burden presented by CVD is largely due to the continued impact of modifiable life style risk factors and aging, with complex and distinctive contributions arising from biological sex and inequalities in access to health care1,3–7. The complexities surrounding individual CVD risk reflect a multifaceted biological interplay between genetics, epigenetics, lifestyle, and environmental factors that cumulatively contributes to CVD development and progression and extend from the heart to the vascular system. The last decade has therefore leveraged significant advances in ‘Omic capabilities to produce a multiomic understanding to CVD development and treatment8–10. It is therefore noteworthy that, in spite of these advances, CVD remains a major global burden, underscoring the need to leverage more targeted approaches to both research and personalized therapy such as single-cell biology.

Cardiovascular disease epitomizes the concept of form follows function where single cells distributed in a three-dimensional extracellular matrix (ECM) microenvironment, or the form, collectively contribute to the overall function of the heart. Cell populations such as fibroblasts, endothelial cells, vascular smooth muscle cells, pericytes, immune cells, all contribute to a multicellular network that becomes a maladaptive, feedforward system in CVD to decrease heart function8,11,12. These cells are spatially distributed, presenting a dimensional integrative system biology that drives molecular pathways of CVD pathology such as chronic inflammation, fibrotic remodeling, immune cell flux, cellular differentiation, and lipid alterations13–16. Within the last 5 years, there have been major advances in single cell sequencing and spatial profiling that make it feasible to evaluate spatial single cell biology from individual patients17–19. For CVD, single cell approaches have primarily been at the transcriptional level; these important studies show that even within a single cardiovascular cell type there is a broad range of diversification, plasticity, heterogeneity, all which demonstrate the specificity of cellular mechanisms required for appropriate heart function20–25. A significant gap in understanding CVD towards personalized medicine is the lack of studies addressing spatial protein-level dynamics, including post-translational modifications, especially those of the extracellular microenvironment. Proteins present real-time monitors of cellular function and are the majority composition of the extracellular matrix (ECM), the dimensional microenvironment through which cells migrate, differentiate, and signal between cell types. Post-translational modifications are dynamic, metabolically-driven changes to proteins that occur during or immediately after protein synthesis and are also a significant component to cell sensing within the extracellular microenvironment. ECM proteomics rarely correlates with transcriptional profiling due to in part to protein and post-translational modification, processing, and degradation26,27. Proteins thus represent the real-time processing of the cardiovascular system, reflecting early changes towards CVD pathology. Although single cell to spatial proteomic expression has high potential to in reporting biomarkers of prognosis and diagnosis, there are limited studies leveraging this technology in cardiac research. this compendium review focuses on current state-of-the art advances and resources specifically for cardiac tissue analysis (not the vascular system) research by single-cell proteomics and spatial proteomics by mass spectrometry imaging (MSI) towards stimulating advances that mitigate the high global burden of CVD.

Single Cell Proteomics and Spatial Proteomics

Single cell proteomics and spatial proteomics by mass spectrometry imaging evolved through a series of parallel technological advances both working towards personalized medicine. Single cell proteomics is a technology that reports all of the proteins from an isolated single cell through a combination of high throughput chromatography coupled to highly sensitivity mass spectrometry instrumentation to generate sequences of amino acids and map those sequences back to proteins. Single cell proteomics produces quantitative, cell-specific measurements of protein abundance, post-translational modifications, and signaling pathways, and can account for functional heterogeneity among individual cells that appear similar at a transcriptional level. Spatial proteomic approaches maintain the cell localization within the context of the tissue microenvironment to report spatial relationships between cell types, understand molecular signatures of regional pathology, and evaluate structure-function relationships. Spatial proteomics is thus a powerful approach to localized protein interaction within a dimensional microenvironment. Spatial proteomics in the context named as the 2024 Method of the Year28 relates to a broad range of methods where multiple proteins are detected using antibody-based approaches. Examples of such technologies are microfluidic-driven29 sequential immunofluorescence (COMET)30,31, DNA conjugated antibodies (co-detection by indexing; CODEX), the fluorometriciterative bleaching extends multiplexity (IBEX), , rare metal conjugated antibodies with detection by mass spectrometry (multiplexed ion beam imaging; MIBI or imaging mass cytometry; IMC). This broad definition of spatial proteomics includes methods using early work using laser capture microdissection to spatially extract cells and tissue regions prior to proteomics32–34 and extends to deep learning artificial intelligence to identify cell populations in a region, followed by laser dissection of the region to collect individual cells and mass spectrometry-based proteomics (deep visual proteomics; DVP35,36). Another type of spatial proteomics uses mass spectrometry imaging (MSI), directly detecting proteins or peptides from tissue sections by mass spectrometry. MSI is an especially powerful technique for CVD as spatial proteomics can be collected along with metabolomics, lipidomics, glycomics, and transcriptomics from the same tissue section. For CVD, this is an especially important advantage as the multiomic capabilities by MSI produces an understanding of the highly complex molecular interplay that produces specific cardiovascular pathologies. When integrated together, single-cell proteomics defines the functional protein status of each cell and spatial multiomics by MSI has the capability to anchor cellular states with precise microenvironmental contexts (Figure 1). The combined framework can be used to link cellular phenotypes to histological/pathological landscapes, identify microenvironment-dependent signaling pathways, and uncover how localized cues such as fibrosis, hypoxia, inflammation, or vascular proximity shape disease progression and outcome. Such integration is particularly powerful in cardiovascular research, where mechanical forces, regional injury, and extracellular matrix remodeling generate highly localized protein-level differences that cannot be captured by singular transcriptomics or spatial transcriptomics.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Single cell proteomics and spatialomics technologies in cardiovascular research. Single cell proteomics have emerged that allow functional reporting of single cell status towards identifying druggable cell targets. Multiomic spatialomics can now report multiple analyte types from a single tissue section, define cell and region-specific pathologies and biomarkers. MALDI MSI may be used for arrays of cells or cell models to uncover and investigate biomarkers found in tissue imaging. The current use of artificial intelligence in both fields amplifies the synergy of both technologies for personalized medicine.

Single Cell Proteomics

Single-cell proteomics (SCP) is the quantitative survey of the working proteins from a single cell, down to single digit protein copy numbers. SCP has advanced rapidly since the introduction of the Single Cell ProtEomics by Mass Spectrometry (SCoPE-MS) approach by Slavov and colleagues in 201837 (Table 1), which demonstrated that proteomic signatures can be used to distinguish cellular subpopulations. Despite this progress, only a limited number of studies have analyzed cells directly isolated from tissues, including cardiac tissue. Working with cardiac tissue cells, such as cardiomyocytes, presents a unique set of challenges inherent to their morphology. Cardiomyocytes are very large (~30-150 μm in length), specialized rod-shaped cells that become extremely fragile upon tissue dissociation and isolation into suspension. Existing techniques, such as Fluorescence-Activated Cell Sorting (FACS), reduce their viability due to the shear stress they undergo during sorting. On the other hand, manual isolation techniques, such as patch clamping, too low throughput for consistent use in cell isolation. Additionally, cardiomyocytes exhibit a highly specialized proteome in which around ~50 most abundant contractile and mitochondrial proteins dominate, thereby masking the detection of the low-abundance proteins. The development of mass–spectrometry–based SCP workflows (Figure 2) have been driven by the need to address four major challenges:(i) generating enough ion copies for accurate MS quantification; (ii) achieving reliable amino acid sequence identification for quantified ions; (iii) scaling the analysis to thousands of single cells at an affordable cost; and (iv) enabling sensitivity for label-free workflows.

Table 1.

A selected list of literature marking the timepoints in the development of SCP-MS with focus on studies contributing to cardiovascular research.

YEAR PROTEINS QUANTIFIED/CELL RUN TIME (MIN/CELL) DATA ACQUISITION
2015 Murgia M et al. 6500 270 DDA
2017 Murgia M et al. 2100 120 DDA
2018 Budnik B et al. 1526 170 DDA
2018 Zhu Y et al. 1500-3000 210 DDA
2021 Specht H et al. 3042 95 DDA
2022 Gebreyesus S et al. 1500 90 DIA-LFQ
2022 Webber K et al. 986 30 DDA
2023 Derks J et al. 1000 10 DIA-LFQ
2023 Thielert M et al. 2377 18 DIA-LFQ
2023 Momenzadeh A et al. 868 15 DIA-LFQ
2023 Kreimer et al. 1145 15 DIA-LFQ
2023 Johnston S et al. 2374 95 DDA
2023 Ctorecka et al. 1957 80 DDA-TMT
2024 Ctorecka et al. 3500 36 DIA-LFQ
2024 Wang Y et al. 3008 21 DIA-LFQ
2024 Fulcher et al. 2934 60 DDA
2024 Guzman U et al. 4591 16 DIA-LFQ
2024 Leduc A et al. 1000-3200 41 DDA-TMT/DIA-LFQ
2024 Onat B et al. 723 15 DIA-LFQ
2024 Lizhuo A et al. 2742 10 DIA-LFQ
2025 Chazarin B et al. 1327 15 DIA-LFQ
2025 Saddic L et al. 2746 10 DIA-LFQ
2025 Ye Z et al. 5204 36 DIA-LFQ
2025 Bubis JA et al. 5300 25 DIA-LFQ
2025 Petrosius V et al. 1300-3500 21 DIA-LFQ

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Single Cell Mass Spectrometry Proteomics Workflow. This generalized workflow highlights different choices how single dissociated cells are obtained from the biological system and sorted using different sample preparation platforms; cells are further lysed and treated with trypsin that optionally can be followed by tagging with isobaric amine reactive multiplexing reagents: next the resulting pools of peptides can be analyzed by different liquid chromatography setups coupled to mass spectrometry for quantitation.

Emergence of Single-Cell Proteomics

Early single cell proteomic studies focused on giant cells such as oocytes, which yielded ~450-800 proteins per cell38,39, and on single skeletal muscle fibers, which yielded ~2,100 proteins per fiber40,41. However, these early approaches lacked sufficient sensitivity to detect low-abundance signaling proteins, transcription factors, and cell-surface markers present at only a few thousand copies per cells. Throughput was also limited to roughly multiple hours per sample, restricting its broader application.

Relatively recently, in 2018, the ability to prepare single-cell sample preparation by was transformed by incorporating a “carrier” or “booster” proteome labeled with tandem mass tags (TMT)42. Quantification in data-dependent acquisition (DDA) with TMT was achieved by measuring the relative intensities of these reporter ions in MS2 or MS3 scans, allowing for multiplexed sample processing with up to 35 channels in modern workflows (Figure3A). This strategy reduced sample loss, improved ion detectability, and provided fragment ions that supported confident peptide identification - enabling quantification of more than 1,000 proteins in single embryonic stem cells. To further enhance quantification and throughput, the Slavov group introduced Single Cell ProtEomics version 2 (SCoPE2) in 202143. This approach integrated automated, miniaturized sample preparation into the workflow, reducing both cost and hands-on time. Using this method, Specht et al. quantified ~2,000 proteins in monocytes and macrophages, adapting the process to a 384-well format. To address sample-preparation limitations more broadly, the minimal proteomic sample preparation (mPOP) workflow was developed by the Slavov group and reduced reagent volumes nearly tenfold (to ~1 μL per cell), including enzymes, buffers, and TMT reagents, minimizing the surface area that contacts the sample and reducing protein loss from adsorption. Several groups have built upon this concept, reducing volumes into the hundreds of nanoliters. Notably, nanodroplet processing in one pot for trace samples44(nanoPOTS) developed in Kelly group enabled highly miniaturized workflows and has been used to prepare multiple (10-100 cells44) and single cells with isobarically labeled carriers37. Ctorecka et al presented an automated nanowell-array platform designed to improve sample preparation for multiplexed SCP45. This approach supported ultra-low-volume processing within nano-wells and high-throughput preparation, enabling quantitative analysis of multiple single cells simultaneously while minimizing sample loss. Conceptually, SCP analysis and bulk proteomics ask slightly different questions of the heterogeneity within a cell population, versus compared to different between conditions. This paradigm shift changes quantification assumptions, statistical modeling and considerations for normalization, missingness imputation and lastly biological inferences46. In bulk proteomics, quantification is generally stable, signal is rich from high protein inputs, whereas in SCP, low ion copy numbers compete with technical noise, missingness is frequent and intensity-dependent, requiring extensive quality filtering and cell-level normalization47–49. Isobaric labeling strategies in SCP commonly use a carrier channel to boost peptide identification, which introduces additional considerations such as ratio compression from precursor co-isolation and reporter ion noise, which when compared to bulk proteomics are only moderate and data matrices are relatively complete.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Single Cell Proteomics mass spectrometry methodologies. Distinct SCP MS approaches differ primarily in their data acquisition and quantification strategies. A) DDA is most often paired with peptide labeling by tandem mass tags (TMTs), in which individual single cell peptides are tagged with reporter ions and pooled for acquisition in a single MS run. Multiplexed samples allow for up to 35 channels in modern workflows and require >75,000 resolving power to distinguish 3mDa differences in isobaric tag m/z values, typically achieved with Orbitrap mass analyzers. B) DIA is often paired with label-free quantification (LFQ) and fragments all precursor ions within a specified mass range, capturing comprehensive MS/MS spectra in a single run per single cell. This approach enhances the quantitative reproducibility and has a wider dynamic range and reduced reagents cost, but data complexity requires more processing resources. C) There are also DIA approaches leveraging peptide multiplexing – plexDIA or mDIA which use 3-plex peptide labeling reagents to achieve triple the LFQ-DIA throughput. The quantitative accuracy remains like that of separate DIA injections. The data completeness using this approach is as high as 98% across 3-plexes.

Another approach for SCP uses data-independent acquisition (DIA), typically with label-free quantification (LFQ), in which all precursor ions within a defined mass-to-charge window are fragmented in a systematic manner, generating complete MS/MS information in a single analysis (Figure 3B). This strategy allows for consistent, unbiased sampling of peptides, minimizing the randomness inherent to DDA-based acquisition and improving the reproducibility of quantitative measurements. Here, peptide intensities are obtained independently for each single cell sample without the labeling required in DDA approaches; DIA approaches were introduced later as the SCP technology in microfluidic sample preparation and Bruker’s high sensitivity MS instrumentation progressed50–53. Despite the improvements in in quantification, sensitivity, and dynamic range by DIA, data analysis workflows for SCP still involve working with sparse data, relying on dimensionality reduction (PCA, UMAP54), Leiden clustering55–57, differential abundance across clusters58, cell type/trajectory inference (pseudotime analysis59,60) and other methods adapted from single-cell transcriptomics. Contrasting, data dependent acquisition technology depends on relative quantification across multiplexed samples with extra computational steps to align and correct signals, however it is still broadly used in the SCP field and continuously built upon. It is important to acknowledge that distinguishing technical from biological variance is far more challenging in SCP than in bulk proteomics, which oftentimes use linear models (e.g. Limma61) on robust datasets Those are fundamentally different quantification assumptions, data processing strategies, and statistical frameworks which in SCP aims at resolving cellular heterogeneity within same cell populations.

Most recently, studies have revisited MS1-based multiplexing strategies, adapting them for use with DIA in SCP multiplexing (Figure 3C). These methods leverage one channel as a carrier to enhance sensitivity by minimizing absorption losses. One method, plexDIA62, employs 3-plex peptide labeling, effectively tripling throughput for low-input samples while maintaining quantitative accuracy comparable to separate DIA injections. Using this approach, Derks et al. quantified approximately 1,000 protein groups per plex (up to three single cells per injection) with a trapped ion mobility SCP mass spectrometer, using 30-minute injections (10 minutes per cell). This strategy was later proposed to scale up to a 9-plex format63. The second approach, mDIA64, uses dimethyl peptide labeling. In its 3-plex implementation, with one reference channel and two single-cell channels, it doubled the number of quantified protein groups to a median of 2,377. This was achieved using low input trapped ion mobility instrumentation developed specifically for single cell proteomic analysis, with an injection throughput of 40 samples per day, corresponding to 80 single cell proteomes per day. A next-generation automated platform called nPOP65 has been developed, capable of preparing thousands of single cells simultaneously. nPOP employs piezo-acoustic dispensing to isolate individual cells into ~300-picoliter droplets and carries out multiple sample preparation steps, including lysis, digestion, and labeling within 8-20 nanoliter volumes on a glass slide. This technology has been demonstrated to work with various multiplexed workflows, supporting both non-isobaric and isobaric tagging approaches (super-heavy tandem mass tag) that allow 11-plex, 18-plex, 32-plex, 35-plex, and with potentially adaptations using diethyl, dimethyl, and dimethyl leucine labeling. The ultra-low-volume handling with high-throughput automation, enhances sensitivity, reproducibility, and scalability, and has advanced SCP toward routine biological and clinical applications.

Key Technologies in Single Cell Proteomics

SCP progress has been tightly linked to innovations in chromatographic systems and mass spectrometry instrumentation designed to enhance sensitivity, robustness, and throughput for extremely low-input samples. A major advance came from the development of nanoflow dual-trap single-column LC configurations, as demonstrated Kreimer and colleagues53. Their system decoupled sample loading and elution using parallel trapping columns at nanoliter-per-minute flow rates, allowing for reduced overhead time between injections. Further improvements in low-flow chromatographic performance were reported by Mechtler group, by introducing a high-sensitivity, low-nanoflow LC-MS setup optimizing emitter geometry and ionization efficiency, through maximized ion delivery to the mass spectrometer66. In 2022 and 2024, Kelly and colleagues introduced a multicolumn nanoflow LC system with accelerated offline gradient generation67,68. This approach minimized downtime between runs and improved robustness by distributing wear and tear across multiple columns. Building on this concept, Kelly’s group also demonstrated a preprint69 in 2025 that multicolumn nanoLC could be paired with ultra-short, 5-minute gradients to achieve label-free SCP at unprecedented throughput. Another important set of innovations from Kelly group demonstrated that gradient-elution nanoflow LC could be achieved without a traditional binary pump by using smoothed step gradients70. This pump-free design reduced system complexity and cost, enhanced operational stability, and still provided reproducible and efficient separations required for SCP. On the mass spectrometry side, significant advances in analyzer technology have enabled deeper and more accurate proteomic profiling from single cells. Current SCP work uses multireflectron time of flight analyzer, called the Astral analyzer, for high-sensitivity, label-free proteomic profiling studies with enhanced proteome coverage using optimized workflow71,72. These studies evaluated small single-cell datasets from different cell types to illustrate that achievable proteome depth varies with cell type and size, while also capturing biologically meaningful protein patterns. Another landmark study used the Astral mass analyzer to report ~5,300 proteins per single cell while maintaining high quantitative accuracy73. This level of proteome depth has pushed SCP toward comprehensive characterization of cellular heterogeneity. Collectively, these instrumentation advance have fundamentally reshaped what is experimentally possible in single-cell proteomics in systems biology, developmental biology, and clinical research.

Experimental Design in Single Cell Proteomics

As single-cell proteomics matures, careful attention to experimental design is essential for generating reliable, reproducible, and biologically interpretable data. In 2023 experts from multiple proteomics laboratories emphasized that SCP experiments must be evaluated across the entire workflow from cell isolation to data analysis as each step can introduce variability that is amplified at the single-cell level74. Key considerations in SCP experiments work to ensure accurate cell handling, minimizing sample loss, maintaining rigorous controls, and reporting all experimental parameters transparently (including sample preparation volumes, carrier channel composition, batch performance, chromatography settings, instrument acquisition parameters, and computational pipelines).

Cell preservation and storage represent another critical source of variability, as demonstrated by Onat et al75 who examined how storage conditions affect single-cell proteomes. The authors showed that factors such as freeze–thaw cycles, temperature fluctuations, and duration of storage can alter protein abundance patterns and degrade low-abundance targets. As these effects can confound biological differences between samples, their findings underscore the need to standardize storage protocols, particularly important for multiple batches collected over time. Another important confounder in SCP measurements is cell isolation, which can cause cell lysis or leakage, contaminate the single cell proteome with other proteomes and debris (e.g. extracellular proteome), or alter intracellular stoichiometry76. Cell stress, prolonged handling, enzymatic dissociation, and suboptimal buffers can lead to partial lysis or membrane permeability, allowing proteins to diffuse into the surrounding medium. To mitigate these effects, gentle cell isolation procedures, rapid processing, careful selection of buffers, and implementation of cytosolic markers abundance monitoring in supernatants. Mass spectrometry compatible detergents can minimize sample loss during the single cell proteome experiment77. Standardization in cell handling, storage, and preparation, paired with transparent reporting and benchmarking, ensures that observed proteomic differences reflect true biological variation rather than technical artifacts. As SCP continues to expand into more diverse tissues and clinical applications, such guidelines will be essential for ensuring data quality, comparability across institutions, and confidence in the biological insights derived from single-cell proteome measurements.

Advances and Key SCP Discoveries in Cardiovascular Research

Single-cell proteomics has progressed rapidly through the above-mentioned advances in ultrasensitive mass-spectrometry workflows, but the studies in the field of single–muscle-fiber proteomics40,41,78 laid the groundwork and understanding how to approach the single cardiomyocyte proteomic analysis in more recent years. Starting with the work of Murgia and colleagues in 201540, the group demonstrated that LC-MS/MS-based proteomics could quantify thousands of proteins from individual human muscle fibers and revealed previously unappreciated fiber-type-specific mitochondrial specialization. Their data showed that oxidative and glycolytic fibers differed not only in canonical metabolic enzymes but also in the stoichiometry and composition of mitochondrial respiratory chain components, emphasizing the functional heterogeneity encoded at the proteome level. Building on this foundation, the same group applied single-fiber proteomics to examine how human muscles age and compared proteomes from type I and type II fibers across donors of different ages41. The study described a fiber-type-specific pattern of proteomic remodeling with aging, and importantly, it showed that aging does not affect all fiber types uniformly, providing molecular evidence for selective vulnerability of fast fibers and underscoring the value of single-cell-scale resolution in studying muscle plasticity and decline. To scale these approaches for broader application, subsequent work from Meyer group focused on robustness78 and presented a complete high-throughput workflow enabling the analysis of hundreds of human muscle fibers innovating with methodology designed for high-throughput which opened the door to population-level studies of muscle heterogeneity in exercise adaptation, disease, and aging. In parallel, improved single cardiomyocyte sample prep work79 and separation technique by Kreimer et al53, enabled high-throughput single-cell proteomics of heterogeneous myocardium-derived single cell populations. This methodology showed that deep proteome coverage could be achieved from diverse human and mouse primary cell types, featuring first report of single cardiomyocyte proteome53.

These advances shifted the technical design towards throughput for single-cell proteomics to more complex tissues and cellular models in cardiovascular systems. In 2025 Ai et al80 extended these methods to cardiomyocytes derived from human iPSCs and adult hearts. Using optimized low-input proteomics, the authors characterized distinct cardiomyocyte subpopulations, uncovering proteomic signatures associated with maturation state, metabolic specialization, and electrophysiological phenotypes. The ability to distinguish cardiomyocyte subtypes at the proteome level has important implications for regenerative medicine, disease modeling, and quality control of stem-cell-derived cardiac cells. Complementary work of the same group in Van Eyk laboratory established Single Cardiomyocyte Proteomics (SCarP), a workflow for proteomic characterization of primary mouse cardiomyocytes at single-cell resolution81. This study addressed the intrinsic heterogeneity of cardiomyocytes - cells known to vary in size, metabolic program, contractile protein composition, and stress responses. By applying high-sensitivity mass spectrometry to freshly isolated adult cardiomyocytes, the authors identified proteomic clusters corresponding to distinct cellular phenotypes, highlighting how single-cell proteomics can refine our understanding of cardiac functional diversity. Finally, a 2025 preprint82 extended these approaches to vascular disease, applying single-cell proteomics to dissect cellular phenotypes in Marfan mouse aneurysm tissue. The study used optimized low-input workflows to analyze proteomes of individual cells within the aortic wall, revealing previously unrecognized cell states associated with extracellular matrix remodeling, inflammation, and aneurysm progression. By providing proteomic resolution of disease-associated phenotypes, this work illustrates the promise of single-cell proteomics for uncovering pathogenic mechanisms in cardiovascular disorders.

To make SCP broadly useful in cardiovascular research the efforts should not necessarily focus on better instrumentation but better-quality measurements and inference under cardiomyocyte-specific constraints (large, fragile, sarcomere-dominated and spatially heterogenous tissue). Cardiac tissue dissociation disproportionately damages cardiomyocytes and biases what survives, and this could lead to enriching other cell types like fibroblasts, immune or endothelial cells. The analytical development here involves QC metrics and models that allow for distinction between a cell that is stressed or partially lysed and account for it instead of discarding large proportions of the dataset. Reporting of QC cell status (stress or partial lysis), batch effects metrics, missingness profiles, interference scores (for labeling approaches), and minimal filtering standards for declaring a protein quantifiable in single cells are work in progress for standardization. SCP needs better ways to recover low-abundance biology which could potentially be addressed by smarter acquisition methods that reduce co-isolation, implement improved ion utilization, and computational strategies that extract quantitative signal from very low ion counts. Data matrices are sparse and intensity-dependent – missing data points often means it was not sampled, rather than not present. Cardiovascular datasets add another layer because cell size and sarcomeric/mitochondrial content vary dramatically across cell types and disease states. A long-term but pragmatic effort for cardiovascular endpoints could involve a targeted SCP panel including hybrid discovery and targeted cell-specific peptide lists or protein isoform panels. Finally, valuable heart tissue is frozen or banked in FFPE collections, therefore analytical advances in recovering single cells from archival samples with reliable quantification and pipelines that control for that analytical variation would be key steps to access precious human cardiovascular cohorts.

Integration with other Omics: Multiomics

The integration of SCP with other omics modalities has emerged as a critical strategy for resolving cellular heterogeneity and bridging molecular regulation with functional phenotypes. SCP uniquely captures protein abundance, modifications, and signaling states that are not always predictable from nucleic acid data alone. When combined with transcriptomic, epigenomic, and other single-cell omics layers, proteomics enables a more comprehensive and mechanistic understanding of cell states and transitions83. Recent efforts, such as the PSCS framework described by Meyer group84, highlight the importance of unified data standards and shared analytical infrastructures to support scalable, reproducible multi-omics integration across single-cell datasets, facilitating cross-study comparisons and systems-level biological inference. Technological advances are now showing first endeavors at allowing a coordinated measurement of proteins and transcripts from the same individual cells, strengthening direct correspondence between gene expression and protein output. Recent preprint by Dawar et al.85 demonstrate a high-throughput nanoliter-scale spin-transfer approach that enables joint single-cell proteomic and transcriptomic profiling, reducing sampling bias and improving alignment between molecular layers. Such approaches are particularly powerful for dissecting post-transcriptional regulation, protein turnover, and signaling pathway activation, which are central to understanding dynamic cellular responses in development and disease.

In cardiovascular research, multi-omics strategies combining single-cell proteomics with transcriptomic and epigenomic profiling have revealed specialized cell populations and regulatory programs underlying tissue injury and repair86,87. These studies illustrate how integrating multiple omics layers at single-cell resolution uncovers distinct fibroblast and immune cell subtypes with unique regulatory and functional signatures in myocardial infarction and myocarditis. While these studies primarily emphasize transcriptomic and epigenomic data, the incorporation of proteomic information is increasingly recognized as essential for validating effector functions, immune activation states, and signaling networks. Collectively, these advances underscore the growing role of SCP as a key pillar of multi-omics integration, enabling deeper biological insight and more precise identification of therapeutic targets.

Spatial Proteomics by Mass Spectrometry Imaging

Mass spectrometry imaging (MSI) uses an ion source that is capable of scanning across a surface to produce ions at a specific x,y coordinates with detection by a mass spectrometer. For tissue imaging, the ion source is scanned across a tissue section, collecting a mass spectrum at every x, y coordinate; the mass spectrum at a single x,y point is the MSI data pixel (Figure 4). Each peak detected within a mass spectrum may be mapped across the entire plane of x and y coordinates, reporting changes in intensity as a heatmap distribution across the imaged area. The spatial resolution depends on the ability of the ion source to focus to a small region from single cells to clusters of cells. The spatial resolution is also dependent on the stepsize, or spacing between each data pixel collected. For high spatial resolution imaging, current images can be collected from single cells with sampling tightly spaced between each x,y coordinate (<10 μm in step size), or use larger step sizes (20-80 μm) over tissue sections that are centimeters in size. Total data acquisition time per pixel is highly dependent on the type of mass spectrometer coupled to the ion source. There are many types of ion sources used in MSI88. Of these ion sources, matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI) has been broadly implemented over decades for multiomic detection of cellular and extracellular proteomics from tissue sections, extended from single cell types to single cells89–95 and to visual array analysis96,97.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Overview of MALDI MSI acquisition demonstrated using tryptic proteomic imaging on mouse heart, courtesy of Dr. Christine Kern at Medical University of South Carolina. A) A laser is scanned across the tissue, collecting a mass spectrum at every x and y coordinate. B) Total ion current across the entire heart. Peaks that appear low intensity are highly localized, observed in C. C) Peptide images with corresponding hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stain. Peptides are distinct to different anatomical features of the heart. D) MALDI MSI is highly multiplexed within a single analysis. Shown are 110 images out of 1,359 peptide peaks. Data were collected on a MALDI FT-ICR (Solarix, Bruker) at 60 μm step size.

Integrative Strategies in MSI Approaches

Sample preparation exerts a major influence on the success of MALDI MSI studies, particularly when detecting multiple types of analytes across scales ranging from tissues to single cells. MALDI MSI relies on the choice of chemical matrix, a small organic molecule that absorbs and transfers energy from the laser to the analyte, desorbing the analyte into the gas phase during the process98. Target analyte ionization is highly dependent on the quantized energy distributed from a MALDI matrix during laser desorption and thus different matrices are used for ionizing metabolites, lipids, glycans, peptides and proteins99–101. Secondary to the desorption process that produces ionization energy, the ability of the MALDI matrix to be ablated from a defined region of single cell dimensions is critical to producing a high-definition spatial map of the analytes. A smaller matrix crystal size increases the signal to noise from the detected analyte and improves the ability to achieve precise single cell-sized desorption from the sample. Currently, crystal sizes of 1 μm or less are obtainable for single cell imaging techniques92,102,103. MALDI matrix application is now highly automated and commercial sprayers and sublimators are used to produce consistently small and uniform matrix crystals for spatialomics studies.

The field of MALDI MSI has shown a significant focus on multiomic studies or detecting multiple types of analytes from the same tissue section or from single cells91,104–109. Sequential analyses strategies take into account the type of analyte and the parameters required for detection and can include other modalities such as spatial transcriptomics or second harmonic generation microscopy prior to MALD MSI105,110–112. For multiomic studies that include metabolites, lipids, or drugs, a fresh frozen section is used to produce high quality spatial maps of tissue histology. Typically, metabolites and lipids are collected in positive ion mode and negative ion mode to increase the depth of biological information. After imaging of metabolites and lipids, MALDI matrix and the previously imaged analytes are removed through carefully designed washing steps that improve detection of the next analyte targets. Enzymes are used in cyclical patterns to target specific post-translational modifications (PTM) and protein populations from the same tissue section or single cell (Figure 5). The specificity of enzymes allows targeted multiplex approaches to be applied to either fresh frozen or FFPE tissues after antigen retrieval to expose specific sites for enzyme activity. The pH and chemical composition of the antigen retrieval buffer is evaluated per enzyme and per disease state. Enzyme targeted imaging sequentially deploys enzymes in a way that systematically mines the biology and has analytical benefits. Glycans are metabolically sensitive PTMs that also represent both chemical and steric hindrance to other proteases used in MALDI MSI. N-glycan imaging113 using PNGase F is a general first step in imaging tissue that reports metabolic information and increases access by proteases to target proteomes. Other enzymes such as chondriotinase107 have also been used early in multiomic workflows to improve later protease activity. Elastase and collagenase type III may be used to target respective extracellular matrix proteomes114,115 with increased signal after N-glycan imaging116. Since multiomic approaches that target the extracellular matrix have significant effect on the pathology, the immunohistochemical and pathological stains are completed and digitally scanned before MALDI MSI116,117. Bottom-up proteomic imaging by MALDI MSI first used Carboxy Peptidase Y and later developed tryptic approaches for clinically archived FFPE tissue118–120. General protease enzymes such as trypsin and LysC are now used in sequential combination with collagenase and elastase to report the spatial proteome that includes cellular and extracellular composition. Combinations of enzymes that target the extracellular matrix and cellular populations including chondriotinase, PNGase F, elastase, collagenase and tryptic imaging have been used to evaluate the complete tissue microenvironment107,121. Tissue expansion followed by MALDI MSI is a recent development in single cell level imaging of lipids, N-glycans, and tryptic peptides that works to expand the tissue without disrupting biological distribution122. Last, immunohistochemistry approaches using antibodies that are labeled with photocleavable mass-tags may be detected by MSI. This approach is abbreviated as MALDI IHC, with dozens of antibodies can be detectable in a single MALDI MSI run123. The combination of both enzymatic digestion and proteins detected by antibodies synergistically increases the information and ability to uncover molecular pathology in tissue sections124.

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Mining spatial biology by multimodal, multiomic MALDI MSI. The figure shows a common schematic where tissue sections are imaged by other modalities prior to MALDI MSI. MALDI MSI workflows, especially for clinically archived FFPE tissue, deploy cyclical enzyme imaging to report multiple levels of spatial biology. Enzyme 1 images N-glycans, a sugar post-translational modification tied to metabolic status. Enzyme 2 targets the extracellular matrix proteome using collagenase. Enzyme 3 is trypsin, targets primarily cellular proteins with some reporting of extracellular matrix proteins. This can be continued for multiple enzymes to report multiomic data.

Beyond tissue imaging, the MALDI MSI platform has been leveraged as a way to visualize array data of glycosylation patterns, target proteins, and single cells91,96,97,125,126. Target proteins and single cells are captured on slide prior to imaging by MALDI MSI using modified slide surfaces such as nitrocellulose or amine reactive hydrogel coating. Antibodies that have been validated in quantitative capture of target analytes when bound to solid substrate are used in the absence of reagents such as glycerol that increase analyte delocalization and increase ion suppression. Affinity capture reagents such as antibodies or lectins may be printed or stamped onto the slide91,127 to increase specificity by capturing target proteins and cells from highly complex biofluids. After blocking in detergents that are mass spectrometry compatible, slides are incubated with target biofluid or cells and later rinsed to increase sensitivity. For cells, a brief fixation may be used to maintain cell integrity and location on the slide prior to profiling for metabolites or lipids. Enzymes can again be used in a sequential manner on either proteins or cells. For evaluating N-glycosylation on target proteins, PNGase F may be sprayed onto the printed antibody array after affinity capture of glycoproteins. Trypsin digestion may be used afterwards to assess sequence information and determine N-glycan site occupancy. After enzyme incubation, MALDI matrix is sprayed onto the array slide in lower amounts (about 5x less) compared to the matrix used for tissue imaging. Automated spraying and sublimation produce smaller crystal sizes which enhance signal to noise detection from nanoliter array spots. MALD MSI approaches to evaluating single cell types in culture have also been developed that include evaluation of the extracellular matrix proteome from as few as 3,000 cells and advanced methods that use stable isotopic labeling of N-glycans for studies investigating absolute turnover of N-glycosylation and glycosylation of extracellular matrix proteins89,128,129. The accumulated techniques have developed MALDI MSI as a complete analytical platform for biological studies from multiomic spatial studies down to target proteins and single cells at a patient specific level. Thus, in the context of cardiovascular translational or pre-clinical studies, MALDI MSI has the capability to probe prognostic or diagnostic samples as well as defining basic mechanisms of cardiovascular biology.

Technologies in MALDI MSI

Like SCP, the ability of MALDI MSI to achieve high spatial resolution down to single cells is connected to rapid innovation and commercialization of instrumentation88,130. A pivotable advancement in spatialomics by MALDI MSI was the development of a high repetition 10-20 kHz Nd:YAG laser dynamically focused onto the sample by Galvo mirrors to result in a uniform square impact geometry. This also created a tunable pixel size from 5-100 μm2 in size131, allowing a broad range of applications from single cells to large surgical tissue sections132. Current lasers facilitate rapid collection of more than 150k pixels per hour with negligible damage to the tissue, allowing pathology staining and interpretation of the same sampled tissue section after acquisition. Rapid continuous stage movement was an essential innovation that, combined with high repetition tunable lasers, that now allows minutes to hours of acquisition times for single cell imaging over millimeter to centimeter sized tissue sections133–135. A further advancement in MALDI MSI was the development of a UV laser used in secondary ionization, termed MALDI2136. This is a second laser focused on the plume generated by the initial laser to increase ionization processes and enhance sensitivity, particularly powerful for single cell imaging studies. Landmark innovations in mass analyzers have centered around high-definition reporting of thousands of analytes from a single pixel. Hardware and software advancements in Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance (FT-ICR) technology, where the cell acts as both mass analyzer and detector, have resulted in image acquisition with mass resolving powers >1.6 million with mass accuracies below 100 parts per billion137. Trapped ion mobility (tims) developed by M. Park and colleagues138 was a pivotable development for MALDI MSI139, producing a new dimension of post-ionization separation for image analysis. Significant work has developed MALDI MS/MS imaging capabilities133, and parallel accumulation of serial fragmentation140 coupled with trapped ion mobility is a seminal innovation supporting metabolite, lipid, and peptide MS/MS in MALDI imaging studies141,142. Current imaging studies use MALDI sources can be coupled with many configurations of instrumentation. MALDI coupled with ion extraction to a time of flight tube (MALDI TOF) was the foundational instrumentation used in MALDI MSI120 and is a mainstay for economic image analysis of lipids, peptides, and proteins. The MALDI quadrupole time of flight (MALDI QTOF) uses an ion funnel to collect ions and a quadrupole mass filter to guide ions to a multichannel detector for high throughput, high mass resolution image detection. The versatility in a broad range of complex analyte acquisition from tissues to cells has positioned MALDI MSI as a central technology for spatialomics easily leveraged for multiomic spatial studies.

Experimental Design in MALDI MSI Studies

The success of a MALDI MSI experiment is largely decided before a sample ever reaches the instrument, with experimental design defining the path to reproducible and high-quality image data (Figure 6). In experimental design, the scope of the biological question to be defined along with histological or immunohistochemistry of target biology defines the required spatial resolution, to either single cell level or broad sampling over the entire tissue section. Studies may use a strategy where sampling over the entire tissue section is done prior to defining a target area for single cell imaging. The anatomical site localization and time of collection between all samples should be consistent for the most reproducible results. The three-dimensional anatomical origin of the sample tissue section or single cell has a profound effect on signal variation by MALDI MSI, particularly true for cardiac studies. Chemical staining or immunohistochemical staining of cell markers of additional tissue sections are required to define the biological status of the tissue. At minimum, a section with pathological annotation by hematoxylin (nuclear staining) and eosin (cytoplasm and ECM) demonstrates histological patterns within the tissue section can be annotated by a pathologist for regional pathologies. Strategies intersperse digital scanning of chemical stains or cell marker stains between MALDI MSI of tissue sections for co-registration of specific biological markers with imaging data. MALDI MSI in combination with pre-clinical to clinical imaging such as radiologic data may contribute to study endpoints, thus requires strategies that include positive and negative controls that validate sample preparation. Automated sprayers and sublimators used in sample preparation include documented system suitability criteria that allow reproducibility across multicenter studies. The type of instrument to be used in the study dictates the substrate the sample will be mounted on. For clinically archived samples, the tissue sections are frequently already mounted on a standard microscope slide, and instrumentation with ion funnels (MALDI QTOF, MALDI FT-ICR) may be used. For samples that can be placed de novo onto a substrate, a conductive slide allows use of an extraction voltage source (MALDI TOF). MALDI MSI is highly reproducible, and the use of internal standards can be used to support normalization, evaluate instrument performance, and adjust for potential batch variation117,143–145. Sample power analyses for MALDI MSI studies consider biological variation as a higher variable in experimental design compared to technical variation. The quality metric on evaluating sample preparation includes the use of tissue mimetics146,147, with spike-in standards, evaluation of prominent known peaks, e.g., common lipid peaks, common tryptic autolysis products, common endogenous peptides or positive/negative control tissues. In the application of multiomic approaches, endogenous peaks routinely detected across tissues are used in assessing quality of the image analysis. For general lipidomics, PI 38:4 at 885.5488 (C47H83O13P) in negative mode or glycerophosphocholines 760.5851 (C42H82NO8P) in positive mode is a target for assessment. For N-glycan imaging, the peak 1809.6393 (Hex5dHex1HexNAc4 + 1Na) is a good general tissue marker useful in evaluating imaging analysis. Post-acquisition evaluation of image quality takes into evaluates for high peak signal-to-noise ratio, peak symmetry and resolution, localization of the analytes relative to the applied spatial resolution, and minimal MALDI matrix peaks. For cardiovascular research, a carefully integrated experimental design includes consideration of site localized cardiac anatomy, regional heterogeneity, temporal biology, biological variability, and includes integrative histological studies, instrumentation considerations with quality control over the study lifetime. These points are essential for MALDI MSI studies that are technically robust and produce biologically meaningful data that is translatable across experimental models and clinical cohorts.

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

Schematic overview of experimental design considerations for a MALD MSI experiment. A) For routine analysis, fresh frozen tissue may be used for spatial reporting of drugs, metabolites, lipids, glycans, peptides, and intact proteins. Clinically archived formalin fixed, paraffin embedded tissue is useful for routine reporting for glycans and proteases that targeting different proteomes to produce peptides. B) Co-studies that report target biology are chosen and the order and number of co-study stains interspersing with MALDI MSI determined. C) Rigor focuses on biological vs technical replicates. Study components for quality control are determined, at minimum using internal standards during sample preparation. D) the type of matrix chosen depends on the analyte. This table reports common matrices, E) The analyte population also determines mass resolution. For drugs, small molecules, metabolites, lipids, peptides, mass resolution >60,000 on-tissue is ideal for separating isomers. The type of instrument also determine the substrate the sample will need to be mounted on: requires a conductive coating (MALDI TOF) or does not require conductive coating (MALDI QTOF or MALDI FT-ICR). F) Spatial resolution required determines the type of matric application used. For images over 10 μm step size, a liquid matrix is sprayed onto the sample. For image studies under 10 μm step size, matrix is sublimated onto the sample. G) Data analysis involves types of visualization software available. Images are usually in the 10-30 Gb per image so data storage should be considered. Computational resources available determine the ability to perform complex tasks within image data sets.

Key Advances and Discoveries by MALDI MSI in Cardiovascular Research

The development of MALD MSI occurred parallel with adoption of the technique in cardiovascular research. These advances have resulted in an established foundation for cardiac spatial analysis of multiple analytes, that when combined with multiomics or clinical modalities, is quickly becoming a powerful tool for basic to clinical research. Here, we highlight key examples in cardiovascular research alongside the progress in MALDI MSI emergence. Lipids were a first target for MALDI MSI148 and early cardiovascular research on prototype MALDI MSI instrumentation reported single cell lipid layers uniquely localized in murine aortic valve or aortic valve hinge149. This initial lipid spatialomics data on cardiac tissue demonstrated that molecular pathology found by MALDI MSI could reveal novel subanatomic patterns within the heart. MALDI MSI unveiled the first images of cardiovascular complexity due to lipid regulation, with the first MS/MS lipid images reporting fatty acid chain variation localized to infarcted heart150. Glycerophospholipids were found to have a distinctive spatial localization within the ventricular tissue compared to aortic anatomical features151, implicating a functional role for spatial regulation of the cardiovascular lipid population. A further report demonstrated that glycerophospholipids are distinctively regulated within the extracellular matrix compartments of healthy aortic valves from humans and sheep152, tying spatial lipid regulation to extracellular matrix and tissue function. Spatial lipidomics as a singular imaging analysis of the heart153,154 or combined with proteomic imaging155,156 continues to yield critical insights into cardiac biology and disease. Single cell studies combining lipidomics with MALDI IHC, have been used to report changes in lung fibroblast senescence; however, this has yet to be applied to cardiovascular fibroblasts157. Sub anatomical imaging of intact proteins revealed that small proteins were spatially segregated in lesions of aortic valve stenosis158 and in chick heart models159, supporting a systems biology form-to-function role in cardiac spatial regulation. Intact protein imaging illustrated significant spatial flux in protein regulation during cardiac ischemia/reperfusion160. ECM had historically been only accessible by chemical staining and researchers quickly leveraged MALDI MSI to understand cardiovascular regulation of ECM. In what may be the first multimodal report of MALDI MSI used in cardiovascular research, Lohöfer and colleagues reported processes of ECM synthesis in mouse myocardial infarct healing using a combination of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), MALDI MSI, laser-ablation-inductively-coupled plasma mass spectrometry imaging and conventional chemical staining by Verhoeff van Gieson161. This study showed that Gadoflourine P, a contrast reagent that binds to collagens and other glycoproteins, could be detected and quantified by both MRI and MALDI MSI towards understanding functional deposition of ECM in myocardial infarct healing with applications to the clinic162. For studies involving human investigations, tissue from disease states is routinely stored as formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples; the fixation process limits practical use of decellularization as an approach targeted ECM analysis. Although trypsin had been developed early in MALDI MSI to access FFPE tissue118, in application to cardiovascular research, this enzyme primarily reports on abundant cellular proteins, used in innovative proteomic pathway imaging of aortic aneurysms by Buerger et al163. The extracellular matrix proteome within clinically archived FFPE aortic valve tissue was targeted for spatial proteomics by MALDI MSI using enzymes elastase and collagenase type III114. This study described high molecular proteomic variation, including post-translational modifications, from the elastin and collagen protein network found in porcine aortic valve tissue. The potential in enzyme targeting of the ECM in cardiac processes was shown by therapeutic application of injection of collagen peptides to myocardial infarct site in murine heart164 and uncovered spatial regulation of ECM centered around the injection site. Here, therapeutic peptides which were human in origin compared to endogenous deposition of collagen peptides by the mouse host were defined by MS/MS and ion mobility processes to trace specific healing processes. The enzyme targeting technique found useful for ECM later led to multiplexing up to 7 enzymes to report spatial localization of glycosylation, ECM and cellular proteins from a single tissue section of pediatric aortic valve tissue107, showing that tissue sparing approaches can be used to assess molecular pathology in cardiac tissue. The ECM is highly glycosylated and over 75% of human ECM proteins contain on average 4.3 consensus sites (N-X-S/T, where X≠P) for N-glycosylation. Significant work pioneering N-glycan imaging165 has led to robust protocols in FFPE, frozen tissue, or on printed arrays166,167. The initial N-glycan imaging approaches have been further modified to distinguish sialic acids isomers by chemical derivatization126,168 or define fucose isomers by enzymatic strategies169,170. In cardiac tissue, aortic valve function was linked to anatomic compartmentalization of N-glycosylation with abundant, but localized core fucosylation and 2,3 sialic acid linkages in pediatric congenital aortic valve stenosis171. Current strategies at minimum consider multiplexing N-glycan imaging with ECM imaging on heart tissue (Figure 7). Spatial analysis of small molecule drug localization is a key strength of MALDI mass spectrometry imaging that has been applied to cardiac studies. Quantitative imaging analysis of the anticancer drug doxorubicin using on-tissue chemical derivatization showed rapid clearance in hear compared to other organ tissues172. Here, spatial analysis revealed high uptake in the atria compared to ventricles and lower clearance from the atria after 24 hours, supporting why doxorubicin causes atrial fibrillation in cardiotoxicity. MALDI MSI has been significant in uncovering metabolic processing and was used to evaluate metabolic flux in a rat model diabetic cardiomyopathy173. Here integrating with MALDI MSI with air-flow-assisted desorption electrospray imaging, pathology staining, and trichrome staining showed significant changes in molecular pathology from metals, metabolites, and amino acids. In this study, therapeutic application of ferulic acid, a natural compound small molecule, was found to restore diabetic cardiomyopathy to molecular levels similar to control tissue with anti-fibrotic effects. The MALDI MSI platform was also applied to cultured human aortic endothelial cells to evaluate N-glycan regulation in oxidative stress89. This study used stable isotopic labeling of the amide nitrogen glutamine174,175 to incorporate a single label into N-acetylglucosamine, sialic acid, or N-acetyl galactosamine in a time course exposure to oxidative stress modeled by hydrogen peroxide. Data showed changes in N-glycosylation turnover, with the emergence of highly branched N-glycans appearing at 55 hours89 and accompanying increases in TGFβ1, COL1A1, and CHOP, implicating cell phenotypic differences that include N-glycan changes in oxidative stress. Currently there are few studies leveraging multiomic cell type protocols using the state-of-the-art MALDI MSI platform89,91,128 against cardiac originating cell types. The totality of the highlighted MALDI MSI studies demonstrates that MALDI MSI is an impactful approach to uncovering spatial regulation across multiple analytes, in different cardiac sample types and is unbiased to species. The range of approaches that have been developed for cardiovascular research lead to the current multimodal studies focused on combining powerful MALDI MSI with more clinically driven imaging176,177 that could, in the near future, be translatable to monitor and solve human cardiovascular disease.

Figure 7.

Figure 7.

Multiplexed MALDI MSI of N-glycans and collagen peptides on a single tissue section of cardiac tissue (Rat). Data reports novel spatial variation by post-translational modifications. A) Photomicrograph greyscale image of tissue section prior to acquiring MALDI MSI data. B) N-glycomic spatial regulation. Combined N-glycan image with a single fucose showing different spatial patterns. C) Colorized and heatmap images of the same N-glycans differing by a single fucose structure. D) ECM-targeted spatial proteomics was used to show collagen proteomic network spatial modulation. Example mapping of species conserved cell binding domains from collagen alpha 1(I) protein. Discoidin domain binding and integrin binding domains are shown and highlight spatial variability in mapping the collagen network. O indicates proline hydroxylation site. E) Colorized and heatmap images of two peptides from the same collagen. F) Hematoxylin and eosin stain after multiplexed mass spectrometry imaging.

Computational Opportunities in Cardiovascular Research by MALDI MSI

Any review of MSI spatialomics would be remiss if data analysis were not discussed. The amount and breadth of work that has continually been done in MALDI MSI data analysis is can only peripherally summarized here; this field has rapidly moved from first painstaking data points charted in excel120 to current use of artificial intelligence178. A long-time goal of the MALDI MSI field is to apply the data-rich information for clinical use. As such, pioneering studies using machine learning techniques have been applied to evaluate MALDI MSI derived signatures from large patient datasets for well over a decade179–188, driven by the unique MALDI MSI ability to scan proteomic signatures from FFPE tissue microarrays that contain hundreds of patient samples. Significant advances in MALDI MSI image analysis have been made with software statistical evaluation by spatially-derived regions189–191, image fusion for multimodality studies192, three-dimensional image construction193,194, searchable and quality controlled spatialomics databases195, and prediction of single cell metabolic states196. Current multiomic deep learning tools are beginning truly leverage MALDI MSI in a multiomic capacity197 and integrate MALDI MSI data of any analyte with spatial transcriptomics110,198. However, it is noteworthy that very few of these approaches have been applied to cardiovascular research and this emphasizes the untapped potential for mining the dynamic spatial biology of the heart.

Conclusions

From a systems-level perspective, cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a fundamentally multicellular and multiomic pathology, in which spatially regulated dynamics govern disease initiation, progression, and remodeling. SCP and MSI are converging to rapid real-time reporting from clinically relevant CVD pathology, cells and biofluids. In the near future, the application of artificial intelligence will be used to integrate SCP and multiomic pathology by MSI, defining single cell dynamics at a systems biology level. This data will be able to rapidly integrate transcriptomic, metabolomic, and proteomic data from cell-cell, cell-matrix neighborhood communication networks with clinical data. Such an approach holds promise for earlier detection of CVD, identifying therapeutic strategies that promote adaptive, functional remodeling rather than maladaptive, nonfunctional outcomes. Ultimately, a central goal is to integrate multiomic spatial strategies down to a single cell level and capture the dynamic emergence of CVD in real time, thereby allowing therapeutic interventions to be deployed at the right moment and with appropriate temporal precision to optimize individual cardiovascular health.

Acknowledgement

We are grateful to Harrison B. Taylor for help in experimental work for Figure 7. Biorender was used to create certain parts of some illustrations.

Sources of Funding

PMA is supported in part by NIH/NCI R21CA263464, R21CA286287, R01CA253460; and in part by P30CA138313, 5P20GM130457, the Biorepository & Tissue Analysis Shared Resource, and the Translational Science Laboratory, Hollings Cancer Center, MUSC. AB is supported by the Cedars Sinai Proteomics and Metabolomics Core facility.

Non-standard Abbreviations and Acronyms (In order of appearance in text)

MS

Mass spectrometry

MSI

mass spectrometry imaging

SCP

Single-cell proteomics

TMT

tandem mass tags

SCoPE2

Single Cell ProtEomics version 2

mpop

minimal proteomic sample preparation

nanoPOTS

nanodroplet processing in one pot for trace samples

DIA

data-independent acquisition

LFQ

label-free quantification

PCA

Principal components analysis

UMAP

Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection

plexDIA

Multiplexed data independent acquisition

LC

Liquid chromatography

nanoLC

Nanoliter flow

LC-MS/MS

Liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry

SCarP

Single Cardiomyocyte Proteomics

QC

Quality control

MALDI

Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization

MS/MS

tandem mass spectrometry

ECM

Extracellular matrix

MALDI QTOF

Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Quadrupole Time of Flight

MALDI FT-ICR

Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Fourier Transform-Ion Cyclotron Resonance

MALDI TOF

Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Time of Flight

MALDI IHC

Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Immunohistochemistry

MRI

Magnetic Resonance Imaging

FFPE

formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded

Footnotes

Disclosures: PMA is a Board Member of N-zyme Scientifics.

References

  • 1.Roth GA, Collaborators GBD. Global, regional, and national burden of cardiovascular diseases and risk factors in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2023. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2025;86:2167–2243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Li Y, Cao G-y, Jing W-z, Liu J, Liu M. Global trends and regional differences in incidence and mortality of cardiovascular disease, 1990- 2019: findings from 2019 global burden of disease study. European journal of Preventive Cardiology. 2023;30:276–286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Hu C, Zhang X, Teng T, Ma Z-G, Tang Q-Z. Cellular senescence in cardiovascular diseases: a systematic review. Aging and Disease. 2022;13:103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Adolph TE, Tilg H. Western diets and chronic diseases. Nature Medicine. 2024;30:2133–2147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Vogel B, Acevedo M, Appelman Y, Merz CNB, Chieffo A, Figtree GA, Guerrero M, Kunadian V, Lam CSP, Maas AHEM. Women and cardiovascular disease Commission: reducing the global burden by 2030. The Lancet. 2021;397:2385–2438. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Javed Z, Haisum Maqsood M, Yahya T, Amin Z, Acquah I, Valero-Elizondo J, Andrieni J, Dubey P, Jackson RK, Daffin MA. Race, racism, and cardiovascular health: applying a social determinants of health framework to racial/ethnic disparities in cardiovascular disease. Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes. 2022;15:e007917. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Regitz-Zagrosek V, Gebhard C. Gender medicine: effects of sex and gender on cardiovascular disease manifestation and outcomes. Nature Reviews Cardiology. 2023;20:236–247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Joshi A, Rienks M, Theofilatos K, Mayr M. Systems biology in cardiovascular disease: a multiomics approach. Nature Reviews Cardiology. 2021;18:313–330. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Hill MC, Kadow ZA, Long H, Morikawa Y, Martin TJ, Birks EJ, Campbell KS, Nerbonne J, Lavine K, Wadhwa L. Integrated multi-omic characterization of congenital heart disease. Nature. 2022;608:181–191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Wang R-S, Maron BA, Loscalzo J. Multiomics network medicine approaches to precision medicine and therapeutics in cardiovascular diseases. Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 2023;43:493–503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Grandi E, Navedo MF, Saucerman JJ, Bers DM, Chiamvimonvat N, Dixon RE, Dobrev D, Gomez AM, Harraz OF, Hegyi B. Diversity of cells and signals in the cardiovascular system. The Journal of Physiology. 2023;601:2547–2592. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Xu S, Ilyas I, Little PJ, Li H, Kamato D, Zheng X, Luo S, Li Z, Liu P, Han J. Endothelial dysfunction in atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases and beyond: from mechanism to pharmacotherapies. Pharmacological Reviews. 2021;73:924–967. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Wang X, Chen L, Wei J, Zheng H, Zhou N, Xu X, Deng X, Liu T, Zou Y. The immune system in cardiovascular diseases: from basic mechanisms to therapeutic implications. Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy. 2025;10:166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Bhargava S, De la Puente-Secades S, Schurgers L, Jankowski J. Lipids and lipoproteins in cardiovascular diseases: a classification. Trends in Endocrinology & Metabolism. 2022;33:409–423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Frangogiannis NG. Cardiac fibrosis. Cardiovascular Research. 2021;117:1450–1488. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Porsch F, Binder CJ. Autoimmune diseases and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Nature Reviews Cardiology. 2024;21:780–807. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Du J, Yang Y-C, An Z-J, Zhang M-H, Fu X-H, Huang Z-F, Yuan Y, Hou J. Advances in spatial transcriptomics and related data analysis strategies. Journal of Translational Medicine. 2023;21:330. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Gulati GS, D’Silva JP, Liu Y, Wang L, Newman AM. Profiling cell identity and tissue architecture with single-cell and spatial transcriptomics. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology. 2025;26:11–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Zhang L, Chen D, Song D, Liu X, Zhang Y, Xu X, Wang X. Clinical and translational values of spatial transcriptomics. Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy. 2022;7:111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Miranda AMA, Janbandhu V, Maatz H, Kanemaru K, Cranley J, Teichmann SA, Huebner N, Schneider MD, Harvey RP, Noseda M. Single-cell transcriptomics for the assessment of cardiac disease. Nature Reviews Cardiology. 2023;20:289–308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Koenig AL, Shchukina I, Amrute J, Andhey PS, Zaitsev K, Lai L, Bajpai G, Bredemeyer A, Smith G, Jones C. Single-cell transcriptomics reveals cell-type-specific diversification in human heart failure. Nature Cardiovascular Research. 2022;1:263–280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Hu Z, Liu W, Hua X, Chen X, Chang Y, Hu Y, Xu Z, Song J. Single-cell transcriptomic atlas of different human cardiac arteries identifies cell types associated with vascular physiology. Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 2021;41:1408–1427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Wehrens M, de Leeuw AE, Wright-Clark M, Eding JEC, Boogerd CJ, Molenaar B, van der Kraak PH, Kuster DWD, van der Velden J, Michels M. Single-cell transcriptomics provides insights into hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Cell Reports. 2022;39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Linna-Kuosmanen S, Schmauch E, Galani K, Ojanen J, Boix CA, Örd T, Toropainen A, Singha PK, Moreau PR, Harju K. Transcriptomic and spatial dissection of human ex vivo right atrial tissue reveals proinflammatory microvascular changes in ischemic heart disease. Cell Reports Medicine. 2024;5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Tang Z, Alrumaihi F, Alwanian WM, Alharbi HO, Allemailem KS, Alissa M, Alasmari O, Almousa S, Ainsworth T, Chen X. The future of cardiology: integrating single-cell transcriptomics with multi-omics for enhanced cardiac disease insights. Current Problems in Cardiology. 2025:103005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Lumish HS, Sherrid MV, Janssen PML, Ferrari G, Hasegawa K, Castillero E, Adlestein E, Swistel DG, Topkara VK, Maurer MS. Comprehensive proteomic profiling of human myocardium reveals signaling pathways dysregulated in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2024;84:1999–2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Barbarics B, Eildermann K, Kaderali L, Cyganek L, Plessmann U, Bodemeyer J, Paul T, Ströbel P, Urlaub H, Tirilomis T. Proteomic mapping of atrial and ventricular heart tissue in patients with aortic valve stenosis. Scientific Reports. 2021;11:24389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Karimi E, Simo N, Milet N, Te W, Alsh A, Qu ND, Ail L, Abs R, Alind A, Goodma NM. Method of the Year 2024: spatial proteomics. Nature Methods. 2024;21:2195–2196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Ciftlik AT, Lehr HA, Gijs MA. Microfluidic processor allows rapid HER2 immunohistochemistry of breast carcinomas and significantly reduces ambiguous (2+) read-outs. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110:5363–5368. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1211273110 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Rivest F, Eroglu D, Pelz B, Kowal J, Kehren A, Navikas V, Procopio MG, Bordignon P, Peres E, Ammann M, et al. Fully automated sequential immunofluorescence (seqIF) for hyperplex spatial proteomics. Sci Rep. 2023;13:16994. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-43435-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Migliozzi D, Pelz B, Dupouy DG, Leblond AL, Soltermann A, Gijs MAM. Microfluidics-assisted multiplexed biomarker detection for in situ mapping of immune cells in tumor sections. Microsyst Nanoeng. 2019;5:59. doi: 10.1038/s41378-019-0104-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Cheung W, Darfler MM, Alvarez H, Hood BL, Conrads TP, Habbe N, Krizman DB, Mollenhauer J, Feldmann G, Maitra A. Application of a global proteomic approach to archival precursor lesions: deleted in malignant brain tumors 1 and tissue transglutaminase 2 are upregulated in pancreatic cancer precursors. Pancreatology. 2008;8:608–616. doi: 10.1159/000161012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Hood BL, Grahovac J, Flint MS, Sun M, Charro N, Becker D, Wells A, Conrads TP. Proteomic analysis of laser microdissected melanoma cells from skin organ cultures. J Proteome Res. 2010;9:3656–3663. doi: 10.1021/pr100164x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Simone NL, Remaley AT, Charboneau L, Petricoin EF 3rd, Glickman JW, Emmert-Buck MR, Fleisher TA, Liotta LA. Sensitive immunoassay of tissue cell proteins procured by laser capture microdissection. Am J Pathol. 2000;156:445–452. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)64749-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Mund A, Coscia F, Kriston A, Hollandi R, Kovács F, Brunner A-D, Migh E, Schweizer L, Santos A, Bzorek M. Deep Visual Proteomics defines single-cell identity and heterogeneity. Nature Biotechnology. 2022;40:1231–1240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Zheng X, Mund A, Mann M. Deciphering functional tumor-immune crosstalk through highly multiplexed imaging and deep visual proteomics. Molecular Cell. 2025;85:1008–1023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Budnik B, Levy E, Harmange G, Slavov N. SCoPE-MS: mass spectrometry of single mammalian cells quantifies proteome heterogeneity during cell differentiation. Genome Biol. 2018;19:161. doi: 10.1186/s13059-018-1547-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Lombard-Banek C, Moody SA, Nemes P. Single-Cell Mass Spectrometry for Discovery Proteomics: Quantifying Translational Cell Heterogeneity in the 16-Cell Frog (Xenopus) Embryo. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2016;55:2454–2458. doi: 10.1002/anie.201510411 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Virant-Klun I, Leicht S, Hughes C, Krijgsveld J. Identification of Maturation-Specific Proteins by Single-Cell Proteomics of Human Oocytes. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2016;15:2616–2627. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M115.056887 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Murgia M, Nagaraj N, Deshmukh AS, Zeiler M, Cancellara P, Moretti I, Reggiani C, Schiaffino S, Mann M. Single muscle fiber proteomics reveals unexpected mitochondrial specialization. EMBO Rep. 2015;16:387–395. doi: 10.15252/embr.201439757 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Murgia M, Toniolo L, Nagaraj N, Ciciliot S, Vindigni V, Schiaffino S, Reggiani C, Mann M. Single Muscle Fiber Proteomics Reveals Fiber-Type-Specific Features of Human Muscle Aging. Cell Rep. 2017;19:2396–2409. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.05.054 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Thompson A, Schäfer J, Kuhn K, Kienle S, Schwarz J, Schmidt G, Neumann T, Hamon C. Tandem mass tags:: A novel quantification strategy for comparative analysis of complex protein mixtures by MS/MS (vol 15, pg 1895, 2003). Analytical Chemistry. 2003;75:4942–4942. doi: 10.1021/ac030267r [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Specht H, Emmott E, Petelski AA, Huffman RG, Perlman DH, Serra M, Kharchenko P, Koller A, Slavov N. Single-cell proteomic and transcriptomic analysis of macrophage heterogeneity using SCoPE2. Genome Biol. 2021;22:50. doi: 10.1186/s13059-021-02267-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Zhu Y, Piehowski PD, Zhao R, Chen J, Shen Y, Moore RJ, Shukla AK, Petyuk VA, Campbell-Thompson M, Mathews CE, et al. Nanodroplet processing platform for deep and quantitative proteome profiling of 10-100 mammalian cells. Nat Commun. 2018;9:882. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-03367-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Ctortecka C, Hartlmayr D, Seth A, Mendjan S, Tourniaire G, Udeshi ND, Carr SA, Mechtler K. An Automated Nanowell-Array Workflow for Quantitative Multiplexed Single-Cell Proteomics Sample Preparation at High Sensitivity. Molecular & Cellular Proteomics. 2023;22. doi: ARTN 100665 10.1016/j.mcpro.2023.100665 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Vanderaa C, Gatto L. Revisiting the Thorny Issue of Missing Values in Single-Cell Proteomics. J Proteome Res. 2023;22:2775–2784. doi: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.3c00227 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Wolf FA, Angerer P, Theis FJ. SCANPY: large-scale single-cell gene expression data analysis. Genome Biol. 2018;19:15. doi: 10.1186/s13059-017-1382-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Vanderaa C, Gatto L. The Current State of Single-Cell Proteomics Data Analysis. Curr Protoc. 2023;3:e658. doi: 10.1002/cpz1.658 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Schoof EM, Furtwängler B, Üresin N, Rapin N, Savickas S, Gentil C, Lechman E, Keller UAD, Dick JE, Porse BT. Quantitative single-cell proteomics as a tool to characterize cellular hierarchies. Nature Communications. 2021;12. doi: ARTN 3341 10.1038/s41467-021-23667-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Gebreyesus ST, Siyal AA, Kitata RB, Chen ESW, Enkhbayar B, Angata T, Lin KI, Chen YJ, Tu HL. Streamlined single-cell proteomics by an integrated microfluidic chip and data-independent acquisition mass spectrometry. Nature Communications. 2022;13. doi: ARTN 37 10.1038/s41467-021-27778-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Wang Y, Guan ZY, Shi SW, Jiang YR, Zhang J, Yang Y, Wu Q, Wu J, Chen JB, Ying WX, et al. Pick-up single-cell proteomic analysis for quantifying up to 3000 proteins in a Mammalian cell. Nature Communications. 2024;15. doi: ARTN 1279 10.1038/s41467-024-45659-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Ctortecka C, Clark NM, Boyle BW, Seth A, Mani DR, Udeshi ND, Carr SA. Automated single-cell proteomics providing sufficient proteome depth to study complex biology beyond cell type classifications. Nat Commun. 2024;15:5707. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-49651-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Kreimer S, Binek A, Chazarin B, Cho JH, Haghani A, Hutton A, Marban E, Mastali M, Meyer JG, Mesquita T, et al. High-Throughput Single-Cell Proteomic Analysis of Organ-Derived Heterogeneous Cell Populations by Nanoflow Dual-Trap Single-Column Liquid Chromatography. Anal Chem. 2023;95:9145–9150. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.3c00213 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Becht E, McInnes L, Healy J, Dutertre CA, Kwok IWH, Ng LG, Ginhoux F, Newell EW. Dimensionality reduction for visualizing single-cell data using UMAP. Nat Biotechnol. 2018. doi: 10.1038/nbt.4314 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Blondel V, Guillaume JL, Lambiotte R. Fast unfolding of communities in large networks: 15 years later. J Stat Mech-Theory E. 2024;2024. doi: ARTN 10R001 10.1088/1742-5468/ad6139 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Blondel VD, Guillaume JL, Lambiotte R, Lefebvre E. Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. J Stat Mech-Theory E. 2008. doi: Artn P10008 10.1088/1742-5468/2008/10/P10008 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Lin X, Tian T, Wei Z, Hakonarson H. Clustering of single-cell multi-omics data with a multimodal deep learning method. Nat Commun. 2022;13:7705. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-35031-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Butler A, Hoffman P, Smibert P, Papalexi E, Satija R. Integrating single-cell transcriptomic data across different conditions, technologies, and species. Nat Biotechnol. 2018;36:411–420. doi: 10.1038/nbt.4096 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Trapnell C, Cacchiarelli D, Grimsby J, Pokharel P, Li S, Morse M, Lennon NJ, Livak KJ, Mikkelsen TS, Rinn JL. The dynamics and regulators of cell fate decisions are revealed by pseudotemporal ordering of single cells. Nat Biotechnol. 2014;32:381–386. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2859 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Hou W, Ji Z, Chen Z, Wherry EJ, Hicks SC, Ji H. A statistical framework for differential pseudotime analysis with multiple single-cell RNA-seq samples. Nat Commun. 2023;14:7286. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-42841-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Ritchie ME, Phipson B, Wu D, Hu Y, Law CW, Shi W, Smyth GK. limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43:e47. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Derks J, Leduc A, Wallmann G, Huffman RG, Willetts M, Khan S, Specht H, Ralser M, Demichev V, Slavov N. Increasing the throughput of sensitive proteomics by plexDIA. Nature Biotechnology. 2023;41:50-+. doi: 10.1038/s41587-022-01389-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Specht H, Yeh MDY, Sipe S, Barnes-Seeman D, Adamo M, McDonnell K, Agius MP, Friedrich C, Pang WK, Huang YC, et al. PSMtags improve peptide sequencing and throughput in sensitive proteomics. Molecular & Cellular Proteomics. 2025;24. doi: ARTN 101410 10.1016/j.mcpro.2025.101410 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Thielert M, Itang ECM, Ammar C, Rosenberger FA, Bludau I, Schweizer L, Nordmann TM, Skowronek P, Wahle M, Zeng WF, et al. Robust dimethyl-based multiplex-DIA doubles single-cell proteome depth via a reference channel. Mol Syst Biol. 2023;19. doi: 10.15252/msb.202211503 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Leduc A, Khoury L, Cantlon J, Khan S, Slavov N. Massively parallel sample preparation for multiplexed single-cell proteomics using nPOP. Nat Protoc. 2024;19:3750–3776. doi: 10.1038/s41596-024-01033-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Zheng R, Matzinger M, Mayer RL, Valenta A, Sun X, Mechtler K. A High-Sensitivity Low-Nanoflow LC-MS Configuration for High-Throughput Sample-Limited Proteomics. Anal Chem. 2023;95:18673–18678. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.3c03058 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Xie X, Truong T, Huang S, Johnston SM, Hovanski S, Robinson A, Webber KGI, Lin HL, Mun DG, Pandey A, Kelly RT. Multicolumn Nanoflow Liquid Chromatography with Accelerated Offline Gradient Generation for Robust and Sensitive Single-Cell Proteome Profiling. Anal Chem. 2024;96:10534–10542. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.4c00878 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Webber KGI, Truong T, Johnston SM, Zapata SE, Liang Y, Davis JM, Buttars AD, Smith FB, Jones HE, Mahoney AC, et al. Label-Free Profiling of up to 200 Single-Cell Proteomes per Day Using a Dual-Column Nanoflow Liquid Chromatography Platform. Anal Chem. 2022;94:6017–6025. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.2c00646 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Kelly R, Wang C, Lin HJ, Huang S, Haynie G, Triggs K, Chang Y, Hansen D, Truong T, Xie X. High-Throughput Label-free Single-Cell Proteomics Enabled by Multicolumn NanoLC with a 5-min Cycle Time. Res Sq. 2025. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-8042176/v1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Webber KGI, Huang S, Lin H-JL, Hunter TL, Tsang J, Jayatunge D, Andersen JL, Kelly RT. Gradient-Elution Nanoflow Liquid Chromatography Without a Binary Pump: Smoothed Step Gradients Enable Reproducible, Sensitive, and Low-Cost Separations for Single-Cell Proteomics. Molecular & Cellular Proteomics. 2024;23. doi: 10.1016/j.mcpro.2024.100880 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Petrosius V, Aragon-Fernandez P, Arrey TN, Woessmann J, Üresin N, de Boer B, Su JY, Furtwängler B, Stewart H, Denisov E, et al. Quantitative Label-Free Single-Cell Proteomics on the Orbitrap Astral MS. Molecular & Cellular Proteomics. 2025;24. doi: ARTN 100982 10.1016/j.mcpro.2025.100982 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Ye ZL, Sabatier P, van der Hoeven L, Lechner MY, Phlairaharn T, Guzman UH, Liu Z, Huang HR, Huang M, Li XJ, et al. Enhanced sensitivity and scalability with a Chip-Tip workflow enables deep single-cell proteomics. Nature Methods. 2025;22:499–509. doi: 10.1038/s41592-024-02558-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Bubis JA, Arrey TN, Damoc E, Delanghe B, Slovakova J, Sommer TM, Kagawa H, Pichler P, Rivron N, Mechtler K, Matzinger M. Challenging the Astral mass analyzer to quantify up to 5,300 proteins per single cell at unseen accuracy to uncover cellular heterogeneity. Nature Methods. 2025;22:510–519. doi: 10.1038/s41592-024-02559-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Gatto L, Aebersold R, Cox J, Demichev V, Derks J, Emmott E, Franks AM, Ivanov AR, Kelly RT, Khoury L, et al. Initial recommendations for performing, benchmarking and reporting single-cell proteomics experiments. Nat Methods. 2023;20:375–386. doi: 10.1038/s41592-023-01785-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Onat B, Momenzadeh A, Haghani A, Jiang Y, Song Y, Parker SJ, Meyer JG. Cell Storage Conditions Impact Single-Cell Proteomic Landscapes. J Proteome Res. 2025;24:1586–1595. doi: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.4c00632 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Leduc A, Xu Y, Shipkovenska G, Dou Z, Slavov N. Limiting the impact of protein leakage in single-cell proteomics. Nat Commun. 2025;16:4169. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-56736-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Tsai CF, Zhang PF, Scholten D, Martin K, Wang YT, Zhao R, Chrisler WB, Patel DB, Dou MW, Jia YZ, et al. Surfactant-assisted one-pot sample preparation for label-free single-cell proteomics. Commun Biol. 2021;4. doi: ARTN 265 10.1038/s42003-021-01797-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Momenzadeh A, Jiang Y, Kreimer S, Teigen LE, Zepeda CS, Haghani A, Mastali M, Song Y, Hutton A, Parker SJ, et al. A Complete Workflow for High Throughput Human Single Skeletal Muscle Fiber Proteomics. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 2023;34:1858–1867. doi: 10.1021/jasms.3c00072 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Chazarin B, Cantlon J, Schutte A, Binek A, Becker L, Pham J, Karlstaedt A, Van Eyk JE. Cardiomyocyte isolation using Cellenion’s cellenONE instrument. https://www.scienion.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/AppNote-28-Cedars-Sinai-Cardiomyocyte-isolation-using-Cellenions-cellenONE-instrument.pdf. 2023. [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Ai L, Binek A, Zhemkov V, Cho JH, Haghani A, Kreimer S, Israely E, Arzt M, Chazarin B, Sundararaman N, et al. Single-Cell Proteomics Reveals Specific Cellular Subtypes in Cardiomyocytes Derived From Human iPSCs and Adult Hearts. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2025;24:100910. doi: 10.1016/j.mcpro.2025.100910 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Chazarin B, Binek A, Janssens JV, Becker LE, Kreimer S, Haghani A, Cantlon J, Pham J, Hutton A, Meyer JG, et al. SCarP: Proteome Heterogeneity Characterization of Primary Mouse Cardiomyocytes. Circ Res. 2025;137:1377–1379. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.125.327050 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Saddic L, Kaneda G, Momenzadeh A, Zilberberg L, Song Y, Mastali M, Kreimer S, Hutton A, Haghani A, Meyer J, Parker S. Single Cell Proteomics Reveals Novel Cell Phenotypes in Marfan Mouse Aneurysm. bioRxiv. 2025. doi: 10.1101/2025.02.15.638465 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Fulcher JM, Markillie LM, Mitchell HD, Williams SM, Engbrecht KM, Degnan DJ, Bramer LM, Moore RJ, Chrisler WB, Cantlon-Bruce J, et al. Parallel measurement of transcriptomes and proteomes from same single cells using nanodroplet splitting. Nature Communications. 2024;15. doi: ARTN 10614 10.1038/s41467-024-54099-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Hutton A, Ai L, Meyer JG. PSCS: Unified Sharing of Single-Cell Omics Data, Analyses, and Results. J Proteome Res. 2025;24:4825–4830. doi: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.5c00178 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Dawar P, Markillie LM, Williams SM, Mitchell HD, Bagnoli JW, Cantlon-Bruce J, Seth A, Bracken CC, Paša-Tolić L, Zhu Y, Fulcher JM. High-throughput Single-Cell Proteomics and Transcriptomics from the Same Cells with a Nanoliter-Scale Spin-Transfer Approach. bioRxiv. 2025:2025.2010.2020.681067. doi: 10.1101/2025.10.20.681067 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Zhang SC, Xiang BY, Zhao YH, Wang WJ, Chen LL, Zhou X. Single-cell epigenomic and transcriptomic analysis unveils the pivotal role of GATA5/ISL1 fibroblasts in cardiac repair post-myocardial infarction. Cardiovascular Research. 2025;121:1419–1432. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvaf101 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Tong ZH, Yan XY, Chen T, Song WJ, Su D, Wang NX, Zhang YF, Kong YJ, Wang DN, Wang PH, et al. Single-Cell Multi-Omics Identifies Specialized Cytotoxic and Migratory CD8 Effector T Cells in Acute Myocarditis. Circulation. 2025;152:1003–1022. doi: 10.1161/Circulationaha.125.073836 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Zhang H, Lu KH, Ebbini M, Huang P, Lu H, Li L. Mass spectrometry imaging for spatially resolved multi-omics molecular mapping. Imaging. 2024;2:20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Angel PM, Saunders J, Clift CL, White-Gilbertson S, Voelkel-Johnson C, Yeh E, Mehta A, Drake RR. A Rapid Array-Based Approach to N-Glycan Profiling of Cultured Cells. Journal of Proteome Research. 2019;18:3630–3639. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Zambrzycki SC, Saberi S, Biggs R, Eskandari N, Delisi D, Taylor H, Mehta AS, Drake RR, Gentile S, Bradshaw AD. Profiling of collagen and extracellular matrix deposition from cell culture using in vitro ExtraCellular matrix mass spectrometry imaging (ivECM-MSI). Matrix Biology Plus. 2024;24:100161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Dressman JW, Bayram MF, Angel PM, Drake RR, Mehta AS. Single-Cell Multiomic MALDI-MSI Analysis of Lipids and N-Glycans through Affinity Array Capture. Analytical Chemistry. 2025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Grgic A, Cuypers E, Dubois LJ, Ellis SR, Heeren RMA. MALDI MSI Protocol for Spatial Bottom-Up Proteomics at Single-Cell Resolution. Journal of Proteome Research. 2024;23:5372–5379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Evers TMJ, Hochane M, Tans SJ, Heeren RMA, Semrau S, Nemes P, Mashaghi A. Deciphering metabolic heterogeneity by single-cell analysis. In: ACS Publications; 2019:13314–13323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Buglakova E, Ekelöf M, Schwaiger-Haber M, Schlicker L, Molenaar MR, Shahraz M, Stuart L, Eisenbarth A, Hilsenstein V, Patti GJ. Spatial single-cell isotope tracing reveals heterogeneity of de novo fatty acid synthesis in cancer. Nature Metabolism. 2024;6:1695–1711. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Rubakhin SS, Romanova EV, Nemes P, Sweedler JV. Profiling metabolites and peptides in single cells. Nature Methods. 2011;8:S20–S29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Black AP, Liang H, West CA, Wang M, Herrera HP, Haab BB, Angel PM, Drake RR, Mehta AS. A novel mass spectrometry platform for multiplexed N-Glycoprotein biomarker discovery from patient biofluids by antibody panel based N-Glycan imaging. Analytical Chemistry. 2019;91:8429–8435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Wang M, Grauzam S, Bayram MF, Dressman J, DelaCourt A, Blaschke CRK, Liang H, Scott D, Huffman G, Black A, et al. Spatial omics-based machine learning algorithms for the early detection of hepatocellular carcinoma. Communications Medicine. 2024;in press, 07/January/2024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Knochenmuss R. Ion formation mechanisms in UV-MALDI. Analyst. 2006;131:966–986. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Hossain M, Limbach PA. A comparison of MALDI matrices. Electrospray and MALDI Mass Spectrometry, Fundamentals, Instrumentation, Practicalities, and Biological Applications. 2010:215–261. [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Moore JL, Charkoftaki G. A Guide to MALDI Imaging Mass Spectrometry for Tissues. Journal of Proteome Research. 2023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Zhou Q, Fülöp A, Hopf C. Recent developments of novel matrices and on-tissue chemical derivatization reagents for MALDI-MSI. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry. 2021;413:2599–2617. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Bien T, Bessler S, Dreisewerd K, Soltwisch J. Transmission-mode MALDI mass spectrometry imaging of single cells: optimizing sample preparation protocols. Analytical Chemistry. 2021;93:4513–4520. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Krestensen KK, Hendriks TFE, Grgic A, Derweduwe M, De Smet F, Heeren RMA, Cuypers E. Molecular Profiling of Glioblastoma Patient-Derived Single Cells Using Combined MALDI-MSI and MALDI-IHC. Analytical Chemistry. 2025;97:3846–3854. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Steven RT, Bunch J. Repeat MALDI MS imaging of a single tissue section using multiple matrices and tissue washes. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry. 2013;405:4719–4728. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Dunne J, Griner J, Romeo M, Macdonald J, Krieg C, Lim M, Yagnik G, Rothschild KJ, Drake RR, Mehta AS, Angel PM. Evaluation of Antibody-Based Single Cell Imaging Techniques Coupled to Multiplexed Imaging of N-Glycans and Collagen Peptides by Matrix-assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Mass Spectrometry Imaging. Analytical Bioanaytical Chemistry. 2023;415:7011–7024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Seeley EH. Maximizing data coverage through eight sequential mass spectrometry images of a single tissue section. Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry. 2025;36:1148–1157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Clift CL, Drake RR, Mehta A, Angel PM. Multiplexed imaging mass spectrometry of the extracellular matrix using serial enzyme digests from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue sections. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry. 2020:1–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.van der Vloet L, Mohren R, Bouillod C, Heeren RMA, Vandenbosch M, Barbier Saint Hilaire P. Application of a Multiomics Imaging Workflow to Explore Asparlas Treatment in Solid Tumors. Analytical Chemistry. 2025;97:12736–12745. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Sarretto T, Westerhausen MT, McKinnon JC, Bishop DP, Ellis SR. Evaluation of combined workflows for multimodal mass spectrometry imaging of elements and lipids from the same tissue section. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry. 2025;417:705–719. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Hendriks TFE, Eijkel GB, Visvikis T, Balluff B, Heeren RMA, Cuypers E. One section, two worlds: single-cell integration of MALDI-MSI and spatial transcriptomics on the same single tissue section. Scientific Reports. 2025;15:42660. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Taylor H, Spruill L, Jensen-Smith H, Rujchanarong D, Hulahan T, Ivey A, Siougiannis A, Bethard JR, Ball LE, Sandusky GE. Spatial localization of collagen hydroxylated proline site variation as an ancestral trait in the breast cancer microenvironment. Matrix Biology. 2025;136:71–86. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Croslow SW, Trinklein TJ, Sweedler JV. Advances in multimodal mass spectrometry for single-cell analysis and imaging enhancement. FEBS letters. 2024;598:591–601. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Powers TW, Jones EE, Betesh LR, Romano PR, Gao P, Copland JA, Mehta AS, Drake RR. Matrix assisted laser desorption ionization imaging mass spectrometry workflow for spatial profiling analysis of N-linked glycan expression in tissues. Analytical Chemistry. 2013;85:9799–9806. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Angel PM, Comte-Walters S, Ball LE, Talbot K, Brockbank KGM, Mehta AS, Drake RR. Mapping Extracellular Matrix Proteins in Formalin-Fixed, Paraffin-embedded Tissues by MALDI Imaging Mass Spectrometry. Journal of Proteome Research. 2018;17:635–646. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Enthaler B, Trusch M, Fischer M, Rapp C, Pruns JK, Vietzke J-P. MALDI imaging in human skin tissue sections: focus on various matrices and enzymes. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry. 2013;405:1159–1170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Clift CL, Mehta AS, Drake RR, Angel PM. Multiplexed Imaging Mass Spectrometry of Histological Staining, N-glycan and Extracellular Matrix from One Tissue Section: A Tool for Fibrosis Research. Methods in Molecular Biology. 2021;2350:313–329. PMID: . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Rujchanarong D, Lefler JE, Saunders J, Pippin S, Spruill L, Bethard JB, Ball LE, Mehta AS, Drake RR, Ostrowski MC, Angel PM. Defining the Tumor Microenvironment by Integration of Immunohistochemistry and Extracellular Matrix Targeted Imaging Mass Spectrometry. Cancers. 2021;13:4419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Groseclose MR, Andersson M, Hardesty WM, Caprioli RM. Identification of proteins directly from tissue: in situ tryptic digestions coupled with imaging mass spectrometry. Journal of Mass Spectrometry. 2007;42:254–262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Casadonte R, Caprioli RM. Proteomic analysis of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue by MALDI imaging mass spectrometry. Nature Protocols. 2011;6:1695–1709. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Caprioli RM, Farmer TB, Gile J. Molecular imaging of biological samples: localization of peptides and proteins using MALDI-TOF MS. Analytical Chemistry. 1997;69:4751–4760. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Hulahan TS, Spruill L, Wallace EN, Park Y, West RB, Marks JR, Hwang ES, Drake RR, Angel PM. Extracellular Microenvironment Alterations in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ and Invasive Breast Cancer Pathologies by Multiplexed Spatial Proteomics. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2024;25:6748. PMC11203487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Zhang H, Ding L, Hu A, Shi XD, Huang PH, Lu HY, Tillberg PW, Wang MC, Li LJ. TEMI: tissue-expansion mass-spectrometry imaging. Nature Methods. 2025;22. doi: 10.1038/s41592-025-02664-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Yagnik G, Liu ZY, Rothschild KJ, Lim MJ. Highly Multiplexed Immunohistochemical MALDI-MS Imaging of Biomarkers in Tissues. Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry. 2021;32:977–988. doi: 10.1021/jasms.0c00473 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Claes BSR, Krestensen KK, Yagnik G, Grgic A, Kuik C, Lim MJ, Rothschild KJ, Vandenbosch M, Heeren RMA. MALDI-IHC-Guided In-Depth Spatial Proteomics: Targeted and Untargeted MSI Combined. Analytical Chemistry. 2023;95:2329–2338. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.2c04220 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Blaschke CRK, Black AP, Mehta AS, Angel PM, Drake RR. Rapid N-Glycan Profiling of Serum and Plasma by a Novel Slide-Based Imaging Mass Spectrometry Workflow. Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry. 2020;31:2511–2520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Lu X, McDowell CT, Blaschke CRK, Liu L, Grimsley G, Wisniewski L, Gao C, Mehta AS, Haab BB, Angel PM. Bioorthogonal Chemical Labeling Probes Targeting Sialic Acid Isomers for N-Glycan MALDI Imaging Mass Spectrometry of Tissues, Cells, and Biofluids. Analytical Chemistry. 2023;95:7475–7486. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Scott DA, Wang M, Grauzam S, Pippin S, Black A, Angel PM, Drake RR, Castellino S, Kono Y, Rockey DC. GlycoFibroTyper: A novel method for the glycan analysis of IgG and the development of a biomarker signature of liver fibrosis. Frontiers in Immunology. 2022;13:233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Zambrzycki SC, Saberi S, Biggs R, Eskandari N, Delisi D, Taylor H, Mehta AS, Drake RR, Gentile S, Bradshaw AD. Profiling of collagen and extracellular matrix deposition from cell culture using in vitro ExtraCellular matrix mass spectrometry imaging (ivECM-MSI). Matrix Biology Plus. 2024;24:100161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.McKinnon JC, Balez R, Young RSE, Brown ML, Lum JS, Robinson L, Belov ME, Ooi L, Tortorella S, Mitchell TW. MALDI-2-enabled oversampling for the mass spectrometry imaging of metabolites at single-cell resolution. Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry. 2024;35:2729–2742. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Ngai YT, Lau D, Mittal P, Hoffmann P. Mini review: Highlight of recent advances and applications of MALDI mass spectrometry imaging in 2024. Analytical Science Advances. 2025;6:e70016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Holle A, Haase A, Hoehndorf J. Laser spot control in maldi mass spectrometers. In: Google Patents; 2014. [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Spraggins JM, Rizzo DG, Moore JL, Noto MJ, Skaar EP, Caprioli RM. Next-generation technologies for spatial proteomics: integrating ultra-high speed MALDI-TOF and high mass resolution MALDI FTICR imaging mass spectrometry for protein analysis. Proteomics. 2016;16:1678–1689. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Prentice BM, Chumbley CW, Caprioli RM. High-speed MALDI MS/MS imaging mass spectrometry using continuous raster sampling. Journal of Mass Spectrometry. 2015;50:703–710. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Barré F, Rocha B, Dewez F, Towers M, Murray P, Claude E, Cillero-Pastor B, Heeren R, Siegel TP. Faster raster matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry imaging of lipids at high lateral resolution. International Journal of Mass Spectrometry. 2019;437:38–48. [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Spraggins JM, Caprioli RM. High-speed MALDI-TOF imaging mass spectrometry: rapid ion image acquisition and considerations for next generation instrumentation. Journal of the American Society for mass Spectrometry. 2011;22:1022–1031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Soltwisch J, Kettling H, Vens-Cappell S, Wiegelmann M, Müthing J, Dreisewerd K. Mass spectrometry imaging with laser-induced postionization. Science. 2015;348:211–215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Bowman AP, Blakney GT, Hendrickson CL, Ellis SR, Heeren RMA, Smith DF. Ultra-high mass resolving power, mass accuracy, and dynamic range MALDI mass spectrometry imaging by 21-T FT-ICR MS. Analytical Chemistry. 2020;92:3133–3142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Silveira JA, Ridgeway ME, Park MA. High resolution trapped ion mobility spectrometery of peptides. Analytical Chemistry. 2014;86:5624–5627. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Spraggins JM, Djambazova KV, Rivera ES, Migas LG, Neumann EK, Fuetterer A, Suetering J, Goedecke N, Ly A, Van de Plas R. High-performance molecular imaging with MALDI trapped ion-mobility time-of-flight (timsTOF) mass spectrometry. Analytical chemistry. 2019;91:14552–14560. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Meier F, Beck S, Grassl N, Lubeck M, Park MA, Raether O, Mann M. Parallel accumulation–serial fragmentation (PASEF): multiplying sequencing speed and sensitivity by synchronized scans in a trapped ion mobility device. Journal of Proteome Research. 2015;14:5378–5387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Li MJ, Meyer LC, Meier N, Witte J, Maldacker M, Seredynska A, Schueler J, Schilling O, Föll MC. Spatial Proteomics by Parallel Accumulation-Serial Fragmentation Supported MALDI MS/MS Imaging: A First Glance Into Multiplexed and Spatial Peptide Identification. Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry. 2025;39:e10006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Schurman CA, Bons J, Kumaar PVA, Fang J, Hormazabal GV, Roberts A, Riley RR, Tao N, Verdin E, Schilling B. Multiplexed Targeted Spatial Mass Spectrometry Imaging Assays to monitor lipids and NAD+ metabolites in CD38 knockout mice exhibiting improved metabolism. bioRxiv. 2025:2025–2005. [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Djambazova KV, Migas L, Allen J, Colley ME, Esselman A, Tideman L, Pringy E, Kruse ARS, Farrow M, Van De Plas R. QC Metrics for KPMP Data Collection by VU TIS. https://dxdoiorg/1017504/protocolsio14egn3wqyl5d/v1. 2025. [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Ly A, Longuespée R, Casadonte R, Wandernoth P, Schwamborn K, Bollwein C, Marsching C, Kriegsmann K, Hopf C, Weichert W. Site-to-site reproducibility and spatial resolution in MALDI–MSI of peptides from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples. PROTEOMICS–Clinical Applications. 2019;13:1800029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Boskamp T, Casadonte R, Hauberg-Lotte L, Deininger Sr, Kriegsmann Jr, Maass P. Cross-normalization of MALDI mass spectrometry imaging data improves site-to-site reproducibility. Analytical Chemistry. 2021;93:10584–10592. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Groseclose MR, Castellino S. A mimetic tissue model for the quantification of drug distributions by MALDI imaging mass spectrometry. Analytical Chemistry. 2013;85:10099–10106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Barry JA, Groseclose MR, Castellino S. Quantification and assessment of detection capability in imaging mass spectrometry using a revised mimetic tissue model. Bioanalysis. 2019;11:1099–1116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Hankin JA, Barkley RM, Murphy RC. Sublimation as a method of matrix application for mass spectrometric imaging. Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry. 2007;18:1646–1652. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149.Chaurand P, Cornett DS, Angel PM, Caprioli RM. From whole-body sections down to cellular level, multiscale imaging of phospholipids by MALDI mass spectrometry. Molecular & Cellular Proteomics. 2011;10:O110.004259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150.Menger RF, Stutts WL, Anbukumar DS, Bowden JA, Ford DA, Yost RA. MALDI mass spectrometric imaging of cardiac tissue following myocardial infarction in a rat coronary artery ligation model. Analytical Chemistry. 2012;84:1117–1125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151.Jackson SN, Baldwin K, Muller L, Womack VM, Schultz JA, Balaban C, Woods AS. Imaging of lipids in rat heart by MALDI-MS with silver nanoparticles. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry. 2014;406:1377–1386. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152.Angel PM, Bayoumi AS, Hinton RB, Ru YS, Bichell D, Mayer JE, Scott HB, Caprioli RM. MALDI Imaging Mass Spectrometry as a Lipidomic Approach to Heart Valve Research. The Journal of Heart Valve Disease. 2016;25:240–252. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153.Greco F, Quercioli L, Pucci A, Rocchiccioli S, Ferrari M, Recchia FA, McDonnell LA. Mass spectrometry imaging as a tool to investigate region specific lipid alterations in symptomatic human carotid atherosclerotic plaques. Metabolites. 2021;11:250. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154.Huang C, Mezger STP, Looi WD, Muralidharan S, Ji S, Pastor BC, Tan SH, Charles CJ, Kofidis T, Richard AM. Spatial-temporal lipidomics profile of acute myocardial injury. European Heart Journal. 2022;43:ehac544–2919. [Google Scholar]
  • 155.Kaya I, Samfors S, Levin M, Boren J, Fletcher JS. Multimodal MALDI imaging mass spectrometry reveals spatially correlated lipid and protein changes in mouse heart with acute myocardial infarction. Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry. 2020;31:2133–2142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156.Lim J, Aguilan JT, Sellers RS, Nagajyothi F, Weiss LM, Angeletti RH, Bortnick AE. Lipid mass spectrometry imaging and proteomic analysis of severe aortic stenosis. Journal of Molecular Histology. 2020;51:559–571. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157.Sekera ER, Rosas L, Holbrook JH, Angeles-Lopez QD, Khaliullin T, Rojas M, Mora AL, Hummon AB. Single Cell MALDI-MSI Analysis of Lipids and Proteins within a Replicative Senescence Fibroblast Model. Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry. 2024;35:2815–2823. doi: 10.1021/jasms.4c00095 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158.Mourino-Alvarez L, Iloro I, de La Cuesta F, Azkargorta M, Sastre-Oliva T, Escobes I, Lopez-Almodovar LF, Sanchez PL, Urreta H, Fernandez-Aviles F. MALDI-Imaging Mass Spectrometry: a step forward in the anatomopathological characterization of stenotic aortic valve tissue. Scientific reports. 2016;6:27106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159.Grey AC, Gelasco AK, Section J, Moreno-Rodriguez RA, Krug EL, Schey KL. Molecular morphology of the chick heart visualized by MALDI imaging mass spectrometry. The Anatomical Record. 2010;293:821–828. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160.Mezger STP, Mingels AMA, Soulié M, Peutz-Kootstra CJ, Bekers O, Mulder P, Heeren RMA, Cillero-Pastor B. Protein alterations in cardiac ischemia/reperfusion revealed by spatial-omics. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022;23:13847. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 161.Lohöfer F, Hoffmann L, Buchholz R, Huber K, Glinzer A, Kosanke K, Feuchtinger A, Aichler M, Feuerecker B, Kaissis G. Molecular imaging of myocardial infarction with Gadofluorine P–A combined magnetic resonance and mass spectrometry imaging approach. Heliyon. 2018;4:e00606. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 162.Lohöfer F, Buchholz R, Glinzer A, Huber K, Haas H, Kaissis G, Feuchtinger A, Aichler M, Sporns PB, Höltke C. Mass spectrometry imaging of atherosclerosis-affine gadofluorine following magnetic resonance imaging. Scientific Reports. 2020;10:1–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 163.Buerger M, Klein O, Kapahnke S, Mueller V, Frese JP, Omran S, Greiner A, Sommerfeld M, Kaschina E, Jannasch A. Use of MALDI mass spectrometry imaging to identify proteomic signatures in aortic aneurysms after endovascular repair. Biomedicines. 2021;9:1088. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 164.Clift CL, McLaughlin S, Muñoz M, Suuronen EJ, Rotstein BH, Mehta AS, Drake RR, Alarcon EI, Angel PM. Evaluation of therapeutic collagen-based biomaterials in the infarcted mouse heart by extracellular matrix targeted MALDI imaging mass spectrometry. Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry. 2021;32:2746–2754. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 165.Powers TW, Neely BA, Shao Y, Tang H, Troyer DA, Mehta AS, Haab BB, Drake RR. MALDI imaging mass spectrometry profiling of N-glycans in formalin-fixed paraffin embedded clinical tissue blocks and tissue microarrays. PLoS One. 2014;9:e106255, pp 106251–106211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 166.Drake RR, Powers TW, Norris-Caneda K, Mehta AS, Angel PM. In Situ Imaging of N-Glycans by MALDI Imaging Mass Spectrometry of Fresh or Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded Tissue. Current Protocols in Protein Science. 2018;94:e68. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 167.Black AP, Angel PM, Drake RR, Mehta AS. Antibody Panel Based N-Glycan Imaging for N-Glycoprotein Biomarker Discovery. Current Protocols in Protein Science. 2019;98:e99. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 168.Holst S, Heijs B, de Haan N, van Zeijl RJM, Briaire-de Bruijn IH, van Pelt GW, Mehta AS, Angel PM, Mesker WE, Tollenaar RAEM. Linkage-specific in-situ sialic acid derivatization for N-glycan mass spectrometry imaging of FFPE tissues. Analytical Chemistry. 2016;88:5904–5913. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 169.West CA, Drake RR, Mehta AS. Enzymatic Approach to Distinguish Fucosylation Isomers of N-linked Glycans in Tissues Using MALDI Imaging Mass Spectrometry. . Journal of Proteome Research. 2020;19:2989–2996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 170.Rujchanarong D, Spruill L, Sandusky GE, Park Y, Mehta AS, Drake RR, Ford ME, Nakshatri H, Angel PM. Spatial N-glycomics of the normal breast microenvironment reveal fucosylated and high-mannose N-glycan signatures related to BIRADS density and ancestry. Glycobiology. 2024:cwae043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 171.Angel PM, Drake RR, Park Y, Clift CL, West C, Berkhiser S, Hardiman G, Mehta AS, Bichell DP, Su YR. Spatial N-glycomics of the human aortic valve in development and pediatric endstage congenital aortic valve stenosis. Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology. 2021;154:6–20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 172.Van Assche CXL, Krüger DN, Flinders B, Vandenbosch M, Franssen C, Guns P- JD, Heeren RMA, Cillero-Pastor B. Improved on-tissue detection of the anti-cancer agent doxorubicin by quantitative matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry imaging. Talanta. 2024;271:125667. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 173.Liu Y, Zhang X, Yang S, Zhou Z, Tian L, Li W, Wei J, Abliz Z, Wang Z. Integrated mass spectrometry imaging reveals spatial-metabolic alteration in diabetic cardiomyopathy and the intervention effects of ferulic acid. Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis. 2023;13:1496–1509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 174.Orlando R, Lim J-M, Atwood Iii JA, Angel PM, Fang M, Aoki K, Alvarez-Manilla G, Moremen KW, York WS, Tiemeyer M. IDAWG: Metabolic incorporation of stable isotope labels for quantitative glycomics of cultured cells. Journal of Proteome Research. 2009;8:3816–3823. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 175.Fang M, Lim JM, Wells L. Quantitative Glycomics of Cultured Cells Using Isotopic Detection of Aminosugars with Glutamine (IDAWG). Current Protocols in Chemical Biology. 2010;2:55–69. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 176.Dierks J, Brockmann EU, Arias-Loza A-P, Bocklitz T, Nordbeck P, Lorenz K, Tolstik E, Heiles S. Automatic colocalization of high resolution MALDI MSI and Raman imaging applied to cardiac tissue of Fabry disease mouse models. bioRxiv. 2025:2025–2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 177.Fox AG, Buonodono KE, Jones AR, Thomas M, Schepers LE, Earl CC, Goergen CJ, Crouch AC. Multimodal Study of Murine Cardiovascular Remodeling: Four-Dimensional Ultrasound and Mass Spectrometry Imaging. Journal of Visualized Experiments (JoVE). 2025:e67347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 178.Alexandrov T. Spatial metabolomics and imaging mass spectrometry in the age of artificial intelligence. Annual Review of Biomedical Data Science. 2020;3:61–87. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 179.Schwamborn K, Caprioli RM. Molecular imaging by mass spectrometry - looking beyond classical histology. Nature Reviews Cancer. 2010;10:639–646. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 180.Kriegsmann M, Casadonte R, Kriegsmann J, Dienemann H, Schirmacher P, Kobarg JH, Schwamborn K, Stenzinger A, Warth A, Weichert W. Reliable Entity Subtyping in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer by Matrix-assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Imaging Mass Spectrometry on Formalin-fixed Paraffin-embedded Tissue Specimens. Molecular & Cellular Proteomics. 2016;15:3081–3089. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 181.Gonçalves JPL, Bollwein C, Noske A, Jacob A, Jank P, Loibl S, Nekljudova V, Fasching PA, Karn T, Marmé F. Characterization of hormone receptor and HER2 status in breast cancer using mass spectrometry imaging. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023;24:2860. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 182.Lazova R, Seeley EH, Keenan M, Gueorguieva R, Caprioli RM. Imaging mass spectrometry—a new and promising method to differentiate Spitz nevi from Spitzoid malignant melanomas. The American Journal of Dermatopathology. 2012;34:82–90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 183.Lazova R, Seeley EH, Kutzner H, Scolyer RA, Scott G, Cerroni L, Fried I, Kozovska ME, Rosenberg AS, Prieto VG. Imaging mass spectrometry assists in the classification of diagnostically challenging atypical Spitzoid neoplasms. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 2016;75:1176–1186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 184.Casadonte R, Kriegsmann M, Zweynert F, Friedrich K, Bretton G, Otto M, Deininger SO, Paape R, Belau E, Suckau D. Imaging mass spectrometry to discriminate breast from pancreatic cancer metastasis in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues. Proteomics. 2014;14:956–964. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 185.Kriegsmann M, Casadonte R, Randau T, Gravius S, Pennekamp P, Strauss A, Oldenburg J, Wieczorek K, Deininger SO, Otto M. MALDI imaging of predictive ferritin, fibrinogen and proteases in haemophilic arthropathy. Haemophilia. 2014;20:446–453. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 186.Wadie B, Stuart L, Rath CM, Drotleff B, Mamedov S, Alexandrov T. METASPACE-ML: context-specific metabolite annotation for imaging mass spectrometry using machine learning. Nature Communications. 2024;15:9110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 187.Verbeeck N, Caprioli RM, Van de Plas R. Unsupervised machine learning for exploratory data analysis in imaging mass spectrometry. Mass Spectrometry Reviews. 2020;39:245–291. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 188.Janßen C, Boskamp T, Le’Clerc Arrastia J, Otero Baguer D, Hauberg-Lotte L, Kriegsmann M, Kriegsmann K, Steinbuß G, Casadonte R, Kriegsmann J. Multimodal lung cancer subtyping using deep learning neural networks on whole slide tissue images and MALDI MSI. Cancers. 2022;14:6181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 189.Bemis KD, Harry A, Eberlin LS, Ferreira C, van de Ven SM, Mallick P, Stolowitz M, Vitek O. Cardinal: an R package for statistical analysis of mass spectrometry-based imaging experiments. Bioinformatics. 2015;31:2418–2420. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 190.Robichaud G, Garrard KP, Barry JA, Muddiman DC. MSiReader: an open-source interface to view and analyze high resolving power MS imaging files on Matlab platform. Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry. 2013;24:718–721. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 191.Trede D, Kobarg JH, Oetjen J, Thiele H, Maass P, Alexandrov T. On the importance of mathematical methods for analysis of MALDI-imaging mass spectrometry data. Journal of Integrative Bioinformatics. 2012;9:1–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 192.Van de Plas R, Yang J, Spraggins J, Caprioli RM. Image fusion of mass spectrometry and microscopy: a multimodality paradigm for molecular tissue mapping. Nature Methods. 2015;12:366–372. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 193.Thiele H, Heldmann S, Trede D, Strehlow J, Wirtz S, Dreher W, Berger J, Oetjen J, Kobarg JH, Fischer B. 2D and 3D MALDI-imaging: conceptual strategies for visualization and data mining. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-Proteins and Proteomics. 2014;1844:117–137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 194.Ma X, Shedlock CJ, Medina T, Ribas RA, Clarke HA, Hawkinson TR, Dande PK, Golamari HKR, Wu L, Ziani BEC. AI-driven framework to map the brain metabolome in three dimensions. Nature Metabolism. 2025:1–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 195.Palmer A, Phapale P, Chernyavsky I, Lavigne R, Fay D, Tarasov A, Kovalev V, Fuchser J, Nikolenko S, Pineau C. FDR-controlled metabolite annotation for high-resolution imaging mass spectrometry. Nature methods. 2017;14:57–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 196.Rappez L, Stadler M, Triana S, Gathungu RM, Ovchinnikova K, Phapale P, Heikenwalder M, Alexandrov T. SpaceM reveals metabolic states of single cells. Nature methods. 2021;18:799–805. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 197.Carstens JL, Krishnan SN, Rao A, Sorace AG, Seeley EH, Ferri-Borgogno S, Burks JK. Spatial multiplexing and omics. Nature Reviews Methods Primers. 2024;4:54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 198.Vicari M, Mirzazadeh R, Nilsson A, Shariatgorji R, Bjärterot P, Larsson L, Lee H, Nilsson M, Foyer J, Ekvall M. Spatial multimodal analysis of transcriptomes and metabolomes in tissues. Nature Biotechnology. 2024;42:1046–1050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES