ABSTRACT
Bloodstream infections (BSI) caused by Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus are frequent and are associated with substantial mortality rate. The host immune response major determinant of the clinical outcomes during BSI. Here, we investigated the innate immune response, by characterizing peripheral blood myeloid cell subsets and caspase-1 activation as a surrogate marker of inflammasome activation in patients with E. coli or S. aureus bacteremia. We prospectively enrolled patients with monomicrobial bacteremia and analyzed peripheral blood samples by flow cytometry. We observed distinct alterations in myeloid cell composition and caspase-1 activation associated with E. coli bacteremia, including an expansion in intermediate and non-classical monocytes, and increased caspase-1 activation in non-classical monocytes. In contrast, these changes were not observed in patients with S. aureus bacteremia. Additionally, we found differences in myeloid cell subset frequencies and caspase-1 activation between patients with and without sepsis, revealing distinct profiles associated with disease severity. Importantly, the differences in myeloid cell subsets and caspase-1 activation between E. coli and S. aureus bacteremia were primarily attributable to the infecting bacteria rather than disease severity. Furthermore, our findings suggest that eosinophil counts, and caspase-1 activation may serve as potential markers to distinguish between bacterial BSI and viral infections. Overall, our study highlights the importance of considering both the infecting pathogen and disease severity when studying the host immune response during bacteremia and suggests that potential innate immune biomarkers may improve the diagnosis and clinical management of BSI.
KEYWORDS: Bacteremia, S. aureus, E. coli, caspase 1, non-classical monocytes, intermediate monocytes
BRIEF COMMENTARY
Background
In translational immunology studies conducted in intensive care units on sepsis, microbiological data are often inconsistently reported, and the investigation of innate or adaptive immune responses based on the etiologic agent involved is scarce.
Translational significance
Here, we show that during bacteremia, the abundance of specific subtypes of circulating myeloid cells, such as non-classical monocytes, as well as their caspase 1 activation, differ depending on the causative bacteria, highlighting pathogen-specific immune signatures with potential diagnostic and therapeutic relevance.
GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT

Introduction
Bloodstream infections (BSI) are defined by the vascular dissemination of one or more bacteria from an initial source of infection. As an example, in a region such as Ontario in Canada, the incidence of BSI was estimated at 150 per 100,000 population per year in 2017, based on data from both hospital and community settings [1]. Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus were the most frequently identified pathogens, consistent with findings typically reported in other studies [2]. In a nationwide Israeli study including 25,376 cases of BSI (both community- and hospital-onset cases) the all-cause mortality rate was 25.6% at 30 days and reached 46.4% at one year [3]. BSI range from uncomplicated E. coli bacteremia associated with urinary tract infection (UTI) to persistent S. aureus bacteremia (SAB) despite appropriate antibiotics and source control [4]. Such heterogeneous clinical situations emphasize the crucial role of host response during BSI.
The intensity of the immune response during BSI is determined, in part, by the innate immune sensing of pathogens. The innate immune recognition system of bacteria relies on pattern recognition receptors (PRRs). PRRs are conserved proteins that recognize pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) derived from microorganisms [5]. Bacterial PAMPs such as lipopolysaccharides, lipoteichoic acid, or muramyl dipeptide have been shown to activate PRRs and their downstream signaling pathways [6]. Among the PRRs, nucleotide-binding domain leucine-rich repeat containing proteins (NLRs) are cytosolic receptors that control the maturation of interleukin-1β (IL-1β) and IL-18. NLRs bind caspase-1 either directly or indirectly via the adaptor protein ASC to form supramolecular complexes called inflammasomes. Upon infection, inflammasomes assemble, promoting caspase-1 activation and the subsequent cleavage of pro-IL-1β and pro-IL-18 into their mature active forms [7]. Since sepsis is thought to result from an imbalance between the pro-inflammatory and the anti-inflammatory host responses, there is a growing interest in investigating inflammasome activation in the context of translational studies of bacterial infections [8–10].
Innate immune responses are primarily mediated by myeloid cells, including monocytes. Three monocytes subsets are conventionally distinguished: i) classical monocytes (CM) which are highly phagocytic, ii) intermediate monocytes (ITM) which are characterized by their antigen-presenting capacity properties and their role in T-cell regulation and iii) non-classical monocytes (NCM) which are patrolling cells able to monitor the vascular endothelium to maintain its integrity that can also acquire pro-inflammatory functions [11]. The analysis of monocyte subsets during sepsis began in the 1990s but remained limited thereafter [12]. Interest in this field has since reemerged, driven largely by the potential of monocyte subset profiling to improve diagnostic and prognostic stratification in patients with sepsis. Several studies have reported the increased frequencies of NCM and/or ITM during sepsis [13–15]. In parallel, immature granulocytes and neutrophils subtypes have been the subject of more in‑depth work [16,17]. We recently described a reduced activation potential of the NLRP3 inflammasome in immature neutrophils of patients with severe sepsis-like COVID-19 [18]. Importantly, levels of activated caspase-1 and nigericin-triggered NLRP3 inflammasome activation potential differed markedly among the different circulating myeloid cells [18]. Indeed, NLRP3 activation potential was increased in NCM and was associated with a decrease in NCM frequency and subsequent changes in patient’s oxygen requirement during the days following analysis. These findings provided a proof of concept that the innate immune profiling may help to identify patient at risk of developing severe forms of infections.
However, in ICU translational immunology studies, microbiological data are often inconstantly reported and the study of innate or adaptive immune response according to the etiologic agent involved remains scarce [19]. This limitation also applies the first studies of NLRP3 inflammasome activation through ASC-speck positive monocytes during severe bacterial infections [8,9]. Indeed, several aspects of the immune response usually studied during sepsis are pathogen-dependent such as frequency of myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) [20–22]. Efforts made to develop a precision medicine for sepsis patients should therefore incorporate microbiological data because (i) pathogen-specific immune response may require tailored therapeutic strategies (ii) such specificities immune signatures may serve as indirect biomarkers for microbiological diagnosis. Accordingly, we present herein the analysis of circulating myeloid cells subset and their caspase-1 associated activation in the whole blood from patients with either S. aureus or E. coli bacteremia.
Methods
Study design and inclusions
This prospective study was conducted at the University Hospital of Nice, France (Infectious Diseases Departmentand Intensive Care Unit, ICU), as well as at the hospitals of Cannes, France (ICU) and Antibes, France (ICU), enrolling patients, from June 2019 to March 2022. Eligible patients were adults (aged 18 years or older), who presented with a monomicrobial bacteremia caused by either S. aureus or E. coli, with at least one positive blood culture within 72 hours before inclusion, and a negative SARS-CoV-2 nasopharyngeal PCR test. Exclusion criteria included unremoved urinary tract obstruction, undrained collections within the first 24 hours of management, infections occurring in patients already hospitalized for other reasons, co-infections, pregnancy, breastfeeding, and immunosuppression defined by the use of immunosuppressive treatment, solid organ or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, chemotherapy-induced neutropenia, or primary immunodeficiency. Healthy control samples were obtained from volunteer blood donors (n = 23) at the French Blood Establishment (Établissement Français du Sang, EFS). In accordance with strict ethical guidelines and data privacy regulations, the EFS provides all samples fully anonymized. Consequently, individual demographic and clinical characteristics for these donors were not available.
The study was conducted in accordance with the principles stated in the Declaration of Helsinki [23]. Patients received both oral and written information about the study, and written informed consent was obtained prior to enrollment. The study obtained approval from French ethics committee (Comité de Protection des Personnes Est-II, number 18/11/06/47949) and is registered on clinicaltrial.gov (NCT03869593).
A total of 35 patients were included (Table 1). We thus established a group of 22 patients with E. coli bacteremia and a group of 13 patients with S. aureus bacteremia. A blood sample was collected at inclusion for flow cytometry analyses. No further samples were taken during subsequent patient management. No therapeutic intervention was associated with the protocol presented in our study. Within both patient groups, we identified patients with sepsis at the time of inclusion based on the Sepsis-3 definition [24]. Time of symptom onset refers to the delay between the first clinical signs reported by the patient related to the portal of entry of the bacteremia, and/or the secondary localization of the bacteremia, and/or the onset of fever.
Table 1.
Characteristics of the bacteremic patients.
| Total n = 35 |
E. coli n = 22 |
S. aureus n = 13 |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 65.6 (14.9) | 71.4 (13.4) | 55.9 (12.3) |
| Male (%) | 19 (54%) | 10 (45%) | 9 (69%) |
| SAPS II score | 27.4 (12.3) | 29.4 (12.1) | 24.3 (12.5) |
| SOFA score | 2.5 (2.8) | 2.8 (3.3) | 2 (1.9) |
| ICU management | 4 (11%) | 3 (14%) | 1 (8%) |
| Sepsis | 19 (54%) | 14 (64%) | 5 (38%) |
| Septic shock | 2 (6%) | 2 (9%) | 0 (0%) |
| Length of hospital stay (days) | 17 (17,2) | 13.9 (19,9) | 22.3 (9,8) |
| In-hospital mortality | 3 (9%) | 2 (9%) | 1 (8%) |
| Comorbidities | |||
| Diabete mellitus | 13 (37%) | 6 (27%) | 7 (54%) |
| Chronic respiratory failure | 1 (3%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (8%) |
| Chronic heart failure | 5 (14%) | 2 (9%) | 3 (23%) |
| Hypertension | 22 (63%) | 16 (73%) | 6 (46%) |
| Chronic renal failure | 3 (9%) | 1 (5%) | 2 (15%) |
| Chronic liver failure | 4 (11%) | 2 (9%) | 2 (15%) |
| HIV | 1 (3%) | 1 (5%) | 0 (0%) |
| Malignancy | 7 (20%) | 5 (23%) | 2 (15%) |
| Time from symptoms onset to hospitalization (days) | 5.9 (9.1) | 3.9 (7.4) | 8.8 (11) |
| Blood culture time to positivity (hours) | 15.7 (8) | 12.3 (3.4) | 21.1 (10.2) |
| Healthcare-associated infection | 5(14%) | 3(14%) | 2(15%) |
| Primary infection focus | |||
| Urinary tract infection | 11 (31%) | 10 (45%) | 1 (8%) |
| Biliary | 7 (20%) | 7 (32%) | 0 (0%) |
| Catheter | 4 (11%) | 2 (9%) | 2 (15%) |
| Endocarditis | 4 (11%) | 0 (0%) | 4 (31%) |
| Skin | 3 (9%) | 0 (0%) | 3 (23%) |
| Unknown | 2 (6%) | 1 (5%) | 1 (8%) |
| Ascitic fluid infection | 2 (6%) | 2 (9%) | 0 (0%) |
| Bone and joint infection | 2 (6%) | 0 (0%) | 2 (15%) |
| Blood count | |||
| WBC (G/L) | 11.3 (5.6) | 9.7 (4.1) | 14 (6.8) |
| Neutrophils (% of WBC) | 77.1 (13.4) | 78.5 (13.9) | 74.8 (12.7) |
| Eosinophils (% of WBC) | 1.3 (1.9) | 1 (1) | 1.8 (2.7) |
| Basophils (% of WBC) | 0.3 (0.2) | 0.3 (0.3) | 0.3 (0.2) |
| Lymphocytes (% of WBC) | 12.3 (9.8) | 11.9 (10.4) | 12.9 (9) |
| Monocytes (% of WBC) | 7.8 (3.7) | 7.3 (4) | 8.4 (3.1) |
| C-reactive protein at inclusion (mg/l) | 137.1 (92.8) | 130.4 (87.6) | 147.8 (103.6) |
Continuous variables are expressed as mean (standard deviation), categorical variables are described as frequencies (percentage).
Flow cytometry preparation and staining
Blood samples were collected from patients via peripheral venous puncture into citrate tubes and analyzed within 24 hours. Whole blood was diluted in RPMI medium 1/1 and subsequently incubated for 30 minutes with the FAM-FLICA caspase-1 kit (Immuno-Chemistry Technologies), containing the irreversible intracellular marker FAM-YVAD-FMK, which fluoresces upon excitation at 488 nm. Viobility™ (Miltenyi Biotec) staining, an intracellular marker, was used to assess cell death. MFI value for FAM-FLICA in unstimulated condition represents basal caspase-1 activation.
Cells were further incubated for 10 minutes at room temperature, shielded from light, with recombinant surface membrane antibodies (Miltenyi Biotec) at a 1/100 dilution, including CD45-VioGreen (clone REA747), CD14 APC-Vio770 (clone REA599), CD16-phycoerythrin (PE) (clone REA423), CD66b PE-Vio770 (clone REA306), HLA-DR PE-Vio615 (clone REA805), CD10 APC-Vio770 (clone REA877), and Siglec-8-PE-Vio615 (clone REA1045). One non-recombinant antibody, CD15 APC (Miltenyi Biotec, clone VIMC6), was also used, with prior incubation with an Fc receptor blocking reagent (Miltenyi Biotec) for 10 minutes when using these antibodies.
Red blood cell lysis was performed using osmotic lysis buffer (BD Biosciences, BD Pharm Lyse Buffer) following the supplier’s instructions. Cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 10 minutes.
Flow cytometry analysis
The marked cells were then analyzed using a MACSQuant 10 flow cytometer (Miltenyi Biotec). A minimum of 80,000 leukocytes (defined by CD45+ cells) per condition were recorded. Raw cytometric data were analyzed with FlowJo v10.8.1. The gating strategy is presented in Supplementary Figure S1. After eliminating cellular debris and doublets, leukocytes were identified as CD45+ cells. Granulocytes were selected based on CD66b expression, and monocytes were identified as CD66b− and CD14+ and further divided into three subpopulations: classical monocytes (CD14high CD16−), intermediate monocytes (CD14high CD16+), and non-classical monocytes (CD14low CD16+). Granulocytes were also divided into three subpopulations, including mature neutrophils (CD66b+ CD16high), eosinophils (CD66b+ CD16low Siglec-8+), and immature neutrophils (CD66b+ CD16low CD15+ CD10−). For all monocytic or granulocytic subpopulations, the median fluorescence intensity (MFI) of FAM-FLICA (in FITC) was measured.
Statistical analyses
Statistical analysis of clinical and flow cytometry data was performed using GraphPad Prism v 9.4. Depending on the data distribution, parametric tests such as Student’s t-test, one-way ANOVA, two-way ANOVA, or non-parametric tests like Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis were employed. In cases where Kruskal-Wallis tests were significant (p < 0.05), multiple comparisons were assessed using the uncorrected Dunn’s posttest, which was justified for planned post-testing exclusively within the E. coli and S. aureus groups. Details of the tests are available in the figure legends.
Results
NCM count and associated caspase-1 activation are increased during E. coli bacteremia but not S. aureus bacteremia
During bacteremia, circulating leukocytes are exposed to various pathogenic bacteria that reached the blood. Considering that Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria harbor different PAMPs and behave differently during infection, we hypothesize that the patient’s myeloid cells flow cytometry profiling and caspase-1 signature would differ according to the infecting pathogen and could provide a pathogen-specific signature for each type of infection. To address this question experimentally we prospectively recruited adult patients with a monomicrobial infection caused by either S. aureus or E. coli, the two most common bacterial pathogens isolated during bacteremia in clinics, whose clinical characteristics are summarized in Table 1.
Peripheral blood cells of patients with E. coli or S. aureus bacteremia were prepared for flow cytometry as previously described [18] and stained for CD45, CD14, CD16, CD66b, CD15, CD10, Siglec-8 markers together with the FAM-FLICA probe to detect enzymatically active caspase-1. Healthy donors (n = 23) were included and analyzed in parallel using identical acquisition and analysis settings (Supplementary Figure S1). This approach enables the identification and characterization of the 3 classes of monocytes (CM, ITM, and NCM), both quantitatively, by measuring their relative frequencies (Figure 1(A-C)) and functionally, by measuring their relative caspase-1 activation through FAM-FLICA median fluorescence intensity (MFI) (Figure 1(G-I)).
Figure 1.

Circulating myeloid cells and associated caspase-1 activation according to the bacteria isolated in blood cultures. Whole peripheral blood cells of healthy donors (n = 23) or patients with E. coli or S. aureus bacteremia were stained for CD45, CD14, CD16, CD66b, CD15, CD10, Siglec-8 markers and for active caspase-1 (detected using the FAM-FLICA probe). Cells were immunophenotyped by flow cytometry. Leukocytes were defined as CD45+. The frequency of monocytes subsets among whole monocytes was analyzed: CD14highCD16− for classical monocytes (A), CD14highCD16+ for intermediate monocytes (B), and CD14dimCD16+ for non-classical monocytes (C). The frequency of monocytes (CD14+) among leukocytes is also displayed (D). CD66b+CD16dim cells were analyzed for CD10 (marker of mature neutrophil) and CD15 (neutrophil marker) and the frequency of CD66b+CD16dimCD15+CD10− immature neutrophils among leukocytes was determined (E). CD66b+CD16dim cells were analyzed for CD66b and Siglec-8 (eosinophil marker) and the frequency of CD66b+CD16dimSiglec8+ eosinophils among leukocytes was determined (F). Except for classical monocytes, cells were analyzed for the median fluorescence intensity (MFI) of FAM-FLICA corresponding to the activation of caspase-1 (G-K). One outlier with a very high FLICA MFI value was excluded from the intermediate monocyte subgroup (S. aureus, non-sepsis). Graphs show mean +/-SD. Data were analyzed with Kruskal-Wallis nonparametric test. If it showed a statistically significant (p < 0.05) difference, multiple comparisons were tested by the uncorrected Dunn’s test. Ns p > 0.05; * p ≤ 0.05; **p ≤ 0.01; ***p ≤ 0.001; ****p ≤ 0.0001.
Interestingly, we measured a specific increase of ITM and NCM during E. coli bacteremia whereas no such increase was observed in the blood of patients with S. aureus bacteremia (Figure 1(A-C)). The frequency of ITM among monocytes was 3.9 % in healthy donors, 9.2% for E. coli (p = 0.0002) and 6.1 % for S. aureus (p = 0.32) and frequency of NCM was 6.0%, 10.9% (p = 0.04) and 5.5% (p = 0.39), respectively (Figure 1(B,C)). Consistent with an increased frequency of NCM and ITM, we observed a proportionally decreased frequency of CM in E. coli bacteremic patients (Figure 1(A)). The increase in frequency was specific to ITM and NCM since the rate of CM was decreased in E coli or not affected in S aureus infected patients compared to healthy donors. The whole monocytes count (% CD45+ cells, Figure 1(D)) did not show any statistically differences across the groups highlighting the importance of monocytes subset analysis rather than total monocyte counts. Importantly, the functional analysis of caspase-1 showed a median fluorescence intensity (MFI) of activated caspase-1 detection in NCM significantly elevated specifically during E. coli bacteremia compared to healthy donor whereas no increase was observed in patients with S. aureus bacteremia (Figure 1(I)).
Our flow cytometry analysis of granulocytes revealed an increased frequency of immature neutrophils during both E. coli and S. aureus bacteremia (Figure 1(E)). We measured a slightly but statistically significant decreased MFI of activated caspase-1 in immature neutrophils for S. aureus compared to E. coli (Figure 1(J)). In addition, patients with E. coli bacteremia displayed reduced eosinophils counts associated with an increased caspase-1 activation in eosinophils (Figure 1(F, K)).
We observed that patients with E. coli bacteremia were older than patients with S. aureus bacteremia (mean age of 71 vs 56 years) and presented a shorter time since the onset of symptoms at enrollment (mean time of 3.9 vs 8.8 days). We did not identify any statistically significant correlation between age and the myeloid populations nor between the time since the onset of symptoms and myeloid populations or the related activation of caspase-1 that could explain these differences (Supplementary Figures S2 and S3). Although a weak inverse correlation was identified between age and a FLICA MFI of ITM, suggesting that age may have attenuated an increase in caspase-1 activation during E. coli bacteremia (Figure 1(H)), the increase in caspase-1 activation observed in NCM during E. coli bacteremia was independent of patient age (Supplementary Figure S2).
Disease severity influences frequency of circulating myeloid cells and associated caspase-1 activation during bacteremia
We next investigated whether these observed differences between the recorded responses against E. coli and S. aureus were associated to the infecting bacteria or were influenced by other factors. Importantly, the profile of patients with S. aureus and E. coli bacteremia differs on one key point, which is disease severity: more patients with E. coli bacteremia had sepsis (Table 1). Because the dysregulated host’s response during sepsis may be associated with variations in circulating myeloid cells and associated caspase-1 activation, we stratified patients according to the presence or absence of sepsis, defined by SOFA score ≥ 2 according to the SEPSIS-3 criteria [24] regardless of the bacteria involved.
While the frequency of CM remains stable (Figure 2(A)), we measured an increase in ITM frequency specifically in patients presenting sepsis but not in bacteremic patients without sepsis criteria (Figure 2(B)). In contrast, we found no difference associated with the NCM frequency (Figure 2(C)). Conversely, despite the absence of change in NCM frequency, the MFI of activated caspase-1 in NCM was significantly elevated in both types of patients compared to healthy donors (Figure 2(H)). The magnitude of increase was similar between sepsis and non-sepsis patients. The Caspase-1 activation was not modified in CM or ITM of bacteremic patients in the two types of host’s response (Figure 2(F, G)). The frequency of Immature neutrophils was non‑significantly increased in sepsis patients compared to non-sepsis patients (mean 1.31% vs 1.12%, p = 0.11) (Figure 2(D)). Likewise, caspase-1 activation in immature neutrophils did not differ between sepsis and non-sepsis patients (Figure 2(I)). However, eosinophils count of sepsis patients was drastically decreased compared to healthy donors: 0.94% vs 2.0% (Figure 2(E)). Conversely, eosinophils frequency in bacteremic patients without sepsis was not reduced compared to healthy donor (Figure 2(E)). Interestingly, the decrease of eosinophils in sepsis patients was associated with an increase in caspase-1 activation (Figure 2(J)).
Figure 2.

Circulating myeloid cells and caspase-1 activation according to disease severity during bacteremia. Whole peripheral blood cells of healthy donors (n = 23) or patients with sepsis or no sepsis during the course Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia were stained for CD45, CD14, CD16, CD66b, CD15, CD10, Siglec-8 markers and for active caspase-1 (detected using the FAM-FLICA probe). Sepsis was defined by the sepsis-3 criteria, which are based on sepsis-related organ failure assessment (SOFA) score. The cells were immunophenotyped by flow cytometry. Leukocytes were defined as CD45+. The frequency of monocytes subsets among whole monocytes was analyzed: CD14highCD16− for classical monocytes (A), CD14highCD16+ for intermediate monocytes (B) and CD14dimCD16+ for non-classical monocytes (C). CD66b+CD16dim cells were analyzed for CD10 (marker of mature neutrophil) and CD15 (neutrophil marker) and the frequency of CD66b+CD16dimCD15+CD10− immature neutrophils among leukocytes was determined (D). CD66b+CD16dim cells were analyzed for CD66b and Siglec-8 (eosinophil marker) and the frequency of CD66b+CD16dimSiglec8+ eosinophils among leukocytes was determined €. Those five types of cells were analyzed for the median fluorescence intensity (MFI) of FAM-FLICA corresponding to the activation of caspase-1 (F-J). One outlier with a very high FLICA MFI value was excluded from the intermediate monocyte subgroup (S. aureus, non-sepsis). Graphs show mean +/-SD. Data were analyzed with Kruskal-Wallis nonparametric test. If it showed a statistically significant (p < 0.05) difference, multiple comparisons were tested by the uncorrected Dunn’s test. Ns p > 0.05; * p ≤ 0.05; **p ≤ 0.01; ***p ≤ 0.001; ****p ≤ 0.0001.
NCM‑associated caspase 1 modifications during E. coli bacteremia are driven by the involved bacteria not disease severity
We have shown herein that both the pathogen and sepsis severity are associated with changes in circulating myeloid cell subpopulations and caspase-1 activation. To determine which of these factors predominantly influence on the changes in each circulating myeloid cell population, we stratified the patients according to both microbiological data and the disease severity (Figure 3(A-I)). We found that difference of ITM frequency between E. coli and S. aureus bacteremic patients were mainly driven by the intensity of pathogen-related host response. Patients with E. coli sepsis exhibited significantly higher ITM frequency than those with S. aureus sepsis (p = 0.011) whereas no difference was observed in non-sepsis patients (Figure 3(B)). Within the E. coli group, ITM frequency in non-sepsis patients (5.4%) was below to those sepsis patients (11.4%), p = 0.038 (Figure 3(B)).
Figure 3.

Circulating myeloid cells and caspase-1 activation according to disease severity and etiologic agent during bacteremia. Whole peripheral blood cells of healthy donors (n = 23) or patients with sepsis or no sepsis during the course Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia were stained for CD45, CD14, CD16, CD66b, CD15, CD10, Siglec-8 markers and for active caspase-1 (detected using the FAM-FLICA probe). Sepsis was defined by the sepsis-3 criteria, which are based on sepsis-related organ failure assessment (SOFA) score. The cells were immunophenotyped by flow cytometry. Leukocytes were defined as CD45+. The frequency of monocytes (represented as percentages) subsets among whole monocytes was analyzed: CD14highCD16− for classical monocytes (A), CD14highCD16+ for intermediate monocytes (B) and CD14dimCD16+ for non-classical monocytes (C). CD66b+CD16dim cells were analyzed for CD10 (marker of mature neutrophil) and CD15 (neutrophil marker) and the frequency of CD66b+CD16dimCD15+CD10− immature neutrophils among leukocytes was determined (D). CD66b+CD16dim cells were analyzed for CD66b and Siglec-8 (eosinophil marker) and the frequency of CD66b+CD16dimSiglec8+ eosinophils among leukocytes was determined (E). Those five types of cells were analyzed for the median fluorescence intensity (MFI) of FAM-FLICA corresponding to the activation of caspase-1 (F-J). One outlier with a very high FLICA MFI value was excluded from the intermediate monocyte subgroup (S. aureus, non-sepsis). Graphs show mean +/-SD. Data were analyzed with Kruskal-Wallis nonparametric test. If it showed a statistically significant (p < 0.05) difference, multiple comparisons were tested by the uncorrected Dunn’s test.
In addition, we observed that NCM frequency was increased in E. coli bacteremia over S. aureus bacteremia (Figure 3(C)), significantly in the subgroup of sepsis patients (9.5% vs 4.9 %, p = 0.041) and with a trend in non-sepsis patients (13.4% vs 5.8%, p = 0.094). Furthermore, there was no difference of NCM frequency between non-sepsis and sepsis patients during E. coli BSI p = 0.87. This data supports the hypothesis that the differences observed among NCM are mainly pathogen-driven rather than driven by disease severity. Similarly, the elevation of caspase-1 activation in NCM during E. coli bacteremia is not driven by disease severity (Figure 3(H)). Proportion of CM among monocytes was higher in S. aureus sepsis patients compared to E. coli sepsis patients (Figure 3(A)) and accordingly to Figures 1(G) and 2(I) we did not detect any significant difference in caspase-1 activation in CM (Figure 3(F)).
Our analysis of immature neutrophils did not allow us to distinguish the relative importance of disease severity and pathogen identity to either their frequency or caspase-1 activation, suggesting that both factors may contribute to this phenotype (Figure 3(D, I)).
Regarding eosinophils, the comparisons provided in Figure 3(E) remain inconclusive, suggesting that disease severity (Figure 2(E)) rather than pathogen identity is the primary driver of the decreased eosinophils count recorded in this study. Likewise, as for immature neutrophils, we were unable to distinguish the respective contributions of the etiologic agent and disease severity to the differences in eosinophils’ caspase-1 activation (Figure 3(J)).
Since NCM frequency appeared to be primarily influenced by the infecting bacteria and could help to distinguish between E. coli and S. aureus, we next asked whether this signature could be also help to distinguish bacterial from viral infections. To address this question, we compared NCM frequencies with those measured in patients with severe and critical COVID-19 patients with similar settings and inclusion period (clinicaltrials.gov NCT04385017).
Strikingly, NCM frequency was markedly lower in severe and critical COVID-19 than in S. aureus an E. coli bacteremia (Figure 4(A, B)). While the caspase 1 activation did not differ significantly between bacterial and viral infection.
Figure 4.

NCM monocytes count and caspase-1 activation between bacteremia and severe or critical SARS-CoV-2 infection. Whole peripheral blood cells of healthy donors (n = 23) or patients with E. coli or S. aureus bacteremia, or patients with severe or critical SARS-CoV-2 infection were stained for CD45, CD14, CD16, CD66b, CD15, CD10, Siglec-8 markers and for active caspase-1 (detected using the FAM-FLICA probe). The COVID-19 patients represented in the graph come from a study conducted by our team with an inclusion period overlapping with this study and with a similar methodology (clinicaltrials.Gov NCT04385017). Cells were immunophenotyped by flow cytometry. Leukocytes were defined as CD45+. The frequency of non-classical monocytes CD14dimCD16+ among whole monocytes was analyzed (A). Non-classical monocytes were analyzed for the median fluorescence intensity (MFI) of FAM-FLICA corresponding to the activation of caspase-1 (B). Graphs show mean +/-SD. Data were analyzed with Kruskal-Wallis nonparametric test. If it showed a statistically significant (p < 0.05) difference, multiple comparisons were tested by the uncorrected Dunn’s test. Ns p > 0.05; *p ≤ 0.05; **p ≤ 0.01; ***p ≤ 0.001; ****p ≤ 0.0001.
Discussion
Our work provides, to the best of our knowledge, the first insights into pathogen-specific alterations in circulating myeloid cell composition and associated caspase-1 activation in the blood of bacteremic patient’s blood infected with the two most common bacterial pathogen responsible for BSI, namely E. coli and S. aureus. We showed that the increased ITM correlates with both the bacterial genus and the disease severity. Conversely, we show that the increase in NCM frequency and increased caspase-1 activation appeared to be specific of the pathogen. The decrease in eosinophils count during E. coli BSI and SAB correlated with disease severity. Notably, the distinct profiles of E. coli vs S. aureus with respect to caspase-1 activation in NCM were predominantly identified within the cohort of non-sepsis patients.
When studying the evolution of monocytes subsets following experimental endotoxemia, Thaler et al. recorded an increase of ITM frequency 6 hours after the beginning of the experiment [25]. NCM showed a trend toward an increased frequency 24 hours later, consistent with the fate of ITM. It is also crucial to consider that the mean interval between symptom onset and sampling was 6 days in our cohort. Such a delay may have allowed the transition from ITM to NCM [26,27].
Consistent with our data, a previous study reported increases in both NCM and ITM during BSI [13]. However, this study did not stratify patients according to bacterial species or infection source. Monocytes subset dynamics has been studied specifically during Gram-negative sepsis including patients with pyelonephritis, acute intra-abdominal infections and primary bacteremia [14]. CM and ITM were pooled together in their analysis and were elevated compared to healthy controls. NCM were likewise increased from Day 1 and interestingly the absolute number of NCM was significantly higher in survivors than in non-survivors 3 days after enrollment. Most of our patients were managed outside the ICU with a relatively low mean SOFA score (2.5). By contrast, the study by Hortová-Kohoutková et al., which included patients with septic shock with a relatively high mean SOFA score (11.5) caused by infection from various sources and etiologic agents, did not identify a difference in NCM numbers between survivors and patients who died early [15]. In E. coli BSI we found a trend toward higher frequency of NCM in non-sepsis patients compared to sepsis patients (Figure 3(C)). Further studies with larger cohort of patients will be needed to determine whether the magnitude of NCM elevation reflects, or contribute to, an appropriate host response to Enterobacteriaceae bacteremia.
The hypothesis that pathogen-related modifications in circulating myeloid cells precede organ failure is not supported by our analysis of duration of symptoms, which did identify a significant influence of this variable. Moreover, NCM have the longest lifespan among monocytes subsets (approximately 7 days) [26] suggesting that despite a longer symptoms duration observed in patients with S. aureus bacteremia, the timing of sampling was unlikely to have masked the NCM elevation. One possible explanation for the NCM elevation specifically during E. coli bacteremia is that tumor necrosis factor a (TNFa) has been shown in vitro to promote monocytes differentiation toward NCM phenotype [28,29]. Furthermore, TNFa level isusually detected at higher levels during Gram negative compared to Gram positive bacteremia [30].
Inflammasome activation has also been previously investigated during sepsis in patients with an Inflammasome activation (using ASC-speck positive leukocyte detection) shown mainly in CM 6 days after enrollment [8]. Despite including patients with different infection sources, they found that low ASC-speck positive monocytes were associated with 90-day mortality. The authors proposed that this offbeat detection of inflammasome activation can be considered a good indicator of the maintenance or resolution in an sepsis-induced immunoparalysis state [31]. Conversely Martinez-Garcia et al. identified increased numbers of ASC-speck positive monocytes on the first day after enrollment in patient with sepsis [9]. These two studies are somehow consistent since elevated ASC-speck positive monocytes were associated to a favorable outcome in both cases. However, the difference in sampling time points, together with methodological differences (whole blood analysis (Cui et al.) vs analysis of PBMC after Ficoll gradient (Martinez-Garcia et al.)), warrants caution when comparing these studies. Using the FLICA probe, we identified caspase-1 activation in NCM from bacteremic patients, most of whom were managed outside the ICU and had a low mortality rate, as early as the first day following positive blood culture positivity. Moreover, the greatest caspase-1 activation measured in NCM was correlated with the non-sepsis status which is consistent with the two studies discussed above and made and support the possibility that activated caspase-1 in NCM may represent a biomarker of an appropriate host response to Enterobacterales bacteremia.
A limitation of our study is that inflammasome activation was assessed by intracellular detection of enzymatically active caspase-1 using the FAM-FLICA probe. Although this approach is widely accepted for evaluating inflammasome activation at the single-cell level, complementary biochemical analyses of sorted myeloid cell subsets, such as immunoblotting for caspase-1 processing or gasdermin D cleavage, would provide additional validation. Future studies using alternative experimental models and larger numbers of purified cells will be required to further validate these findings using complementary biochemical approaches.
Eosinopenia has already been described during bacteremia and has even been associated to unfavorable outcome [32]. In a human model of endotoxemia, within hours, circulating mature eosinophils and blood eosinophils rapidly declined within hours whereas eosinophils precursor remain unaffected [33]. Based on a reduced CD49D expression, the authors suggested the possibility of a tissue-homing mechanism. However, they did not identify any activation or degranulation of the blood eosinophils based on surface marker analysis. In contrast, we found an increased caspase-1 level in the remaining circulating eosinophils suggesting that these cells undergo inflammasome activation during bacteremia. Further studies will be required to determine the role of the functional significance of this response, nevertheless our observation suggests that this feature might be used as a biomarker to distinguish between different types of pathogens.
Here we have shown that NCM and eosinophils display opposite changes in frequency during bacteremia, whereas both cell populations exhibit increased caspase-1 activation.
Circulating myeloid cells were analyzed directly on whole blood, rather than after Ficoll purification, a procedure known to artificially decrease in CM frequency while increasing NCM frequency [34].
The originality of our cohort lies in the inclusion of patients predominantly managed outside the ICU and with a low mortality rate among the 35 patients. This recruitment likely enabled favorable conditions for identifying pathogen-specific immune signatures without confounding effects of a cytokine storm associated with a septic shock and severe dysregulated immune responses. Future studies will have to include patients with a broader range of clinical outcomes during bacteremia to determine whether circulating myeloid cells level and the associated caspase-1 activation relationship can predict disease progression. These studies might compare E. coli and S. aureus patients with similar primary infection sites, although such comparisons may be challenging because of the distinct pathophysiology and epidemiology of these pathogens in community-acquired infections.
An additional limitation of our study is that pathogen classification relied on routine blood culture results. Although patients were categorized according to the pathogen identified by conventional microbiological diagnosis, a culture-confirmed bloodstream infection does not necessarily represent a truly monomicrobial infection. Recent metataxonomic and metagenomic studies have suggested that BSI may involve more complex microbial communities than those detected by routine culture-based methods [35]. Consequently, the immune signatures identified in our study may reflect the host response to the dominant cultured pathogen with a potential contribution of additional microorganisms that remained undetected by standard diagnostics. Nevertheless, because blood culture remains the current clinical gold standard for bloodstream infection diagnosis and therapeutic decision-making, our findings remain directly relevant to routine clinical practice. Future studies combining high-resolution microbiological approaches with immune phenotyping will be important to determine how polymicrobial signatures influence circulating myeloid cell composition and inflammasome activation.
Here, we provide new insights into prerequisites to improve inflammasome activation evaluation in patients: homogeneous bacterial etiologies, in-depth analysis of monocytes subtypes and subgroups of different disease severity. We show that combining an immunophenotyping with a biomarker of the innate immune activation enables discrimination between E. coli and S. aureus using peripheral patient’s blood samples. These findings provide a framework for future studies investigating pathogen-specific immune response and may ultimately facilitate the development of more precise immunomonitoring strategies in the era of immunomodulatory therapies.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements
We thank staff from the C3M core facilities and CHU de Nice Bacteriology and Virology laboratories. We thank Frederic Larbret, Marielle Nebout, Irit Touitou, Sophie Breaud, Maeva Godemert, and members of the DRCI for both technical assistance and fruitful discussion.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by grants from the ANR [ANR-17-CE15-0001], [ANR-22-CE15-0032], [ANR-22-CE14-0003], Investments for the Future programs LABEX SIGNALIFE [ANR-11-LABX-0028–01], [IDEX UCAJEDI ANR-15-IDEX-01], ARC [RAC15014AAA], Université Côte d’Azur. This work was supported by a grant from the Délégation à la Recherche Clinique et à l’Innovation of University Hospital of Nice “2018”, RedPIT, as well as Conseil départemental 06 and Region SUD.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
Data availability statement
The data that support the findings of this study are openly available in « Dataset of the paper : Differences in circulating levels of Non-Classical Monocytes and associated caspase 1 activation during Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli bacteremia » at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18803777 [36].
Open scholarship
This article has earned the Center for Open Science badge for Open Materials. The materials are openly accessible at https://zenodo.org/records/18803777
Supplementary Information
Supplemental data for this article can be accessed online at https://doi.org/10.1080/21505594.2026.2730393
References
- [1].Verway M, Brown KA, Marchand-Austin A, et al. Prevalence and mortality associated with bloodstream organisms: a population-wide retrospective cohort study. J Clin Microbiol. 2022;60(4):e0242921. doi: 10.1128/jcm.02429-21 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [2].Holmes CL, Albin OR, Mobley HLT, et al. Bloodstream infections: mechanisms of pathogenesis and opportunities for intervention. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2025;23(4):210–13. doi: 10.1038/s41579-024-01105-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [3].Schechner V, Wulffhart L, Temkin E, et al. One-year mortality and years of potential life lost following bloodstream infection among adults: a nation-wide population based study. Lancet Reg Health - Eur. 2022;23:100511. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2022.100511 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [4].Khatib R, Johnson LB, Fakih MG, et al. Persistence in Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: incidence, characteristics of patients and outcome. Scand J Infect Dis. 2006;38(1):7–14. doi: 10.1080/00365540500372846 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [5].Medzhitov R. Approaching the asymptote: 20 years later. Immunity. 2009;30(6):766–775. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2009.06.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [6].Li D, Wu M. Pattern recognition receptors in health and diseases. Sig Transduct Target Ther. 2021;6(1):291. doi: 10.1038/s41392-021-00687-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [7].Fu J, Schroder K, Wu H. Mechanistic insights from inflammasome structures. Nat Rev Immunol. 2024;24(7):518–535. doi: 10.1038/s41577-024-00995-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [8].Cui J, Oehrl S, Ahmad F, et al. Detection of in vivo inflammasome activation for predicting sepsis mortality. Front Immunol. 2020;11:613745. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.613745 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [9].Martínez-García JJ, Martínez-Banaclocha H, Angosto-Bazarra D, et al. P2X7 receptor induces mitochondrial failure in monocytes and compromises NLRP3 inflammasome activation during sepsis. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):2711. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-10626-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [10].van der Poll T, van de Veerdonk FL, Scicluna BP, et al. The immunopathology of sepsis and potential therapeutic targets. Nat Rev Immunol. 2017;17(7):407–420. doi: 10.1038/nri.2017.36 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [11].Sampath P, Moideen K, Ranganathan UD, et al. Monocyte subsets: phenotypes and function in tuberculosis infection. Front Immunol. 2018;9:1726. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01726 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [12].Fingerle G, Pforte A, Passlick B, et al. The novel subset of CD14+/CD16+ blood monocytes is expanded in sepsis patients. Blood. 1993;82(10):3170–3176. doi: 10.1182/blood.V82.10.3170.3170 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [13].Gosset C, Foguenne J, Simul M, et al. Machine learning identification of specific changes in myeloid cell phenotype during bloodstream infections. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):20288. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-99628-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [14].Gainaru G, Papadopoulos A, Tsangaris I, et al. Increases in inflammatory and CD14dim/CD16pos/CD45pos patrolling monocytes in sepsis: correlation with final outcome. Crit Care. 2018;22(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s13054-018-1977-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [15].Hortová-Kohoutková M, Lázničková P, Bendíčková K, et al. Differences in monocyte subsets are associated with short-term survival in patients with septic shock. J Cellular Mol Med. 2020;24(21):12504–12512. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.15791 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [16].Meghraoui-Kheddar A, Chousterman BG, Guillou N, et al. Two New neutrophil subsets define a discriminating sepsis signature. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2022;205(1):46–59. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202104-1027OC [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [17].Daix T, Guerin E, Tavernier E, et al. Multicentric standardized flow cytometry routine assessment of patients with sepsis to predict clinical worsening. Chest. 2018;154(3):617–627. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2018.03.058 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [18].Courjon J, Dufies O, Robert A, et al. Heterogeneous NLRP3 inflammasome signature in circulating myeloid cells as a biomarker of COVID-19 severity. Blood Adv. 2021;5(5):1523–1534. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2020003918 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [19].Cain DJ, Del Arroyo AG, Ackland GL. Uncontrolled sepsis: a systematic review of translational immunology studies in intensive care medicine. Icmx. 2014;2(1):6. doi: 10.1186/2197-425X-2-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [20].Cajander S, Rasmussen G, Tina E, et al. Dynamics of monocytic HLA-DR expression differs between bacterial etiologies during the course of bloodstream infection. PLOS ONE. 2018;13(2):e0192883. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192883 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [21].Janols H, Bergenfelz C, Allaoui R, et al. A high frequency of MDSCs in sepsis patients, with the granulocytic subtype dominating in gram-positive cases. J Leukoc Biol. 2014;96(5):685–693. doi: 10.1189/jlb.5HI0214-074R [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [22].Jiang F, Tu M, Zhao J, et al. The clinical significance of myeloid-derived suppressor cells in patients with sepsis: a prospective cohort study. Sci Rep. 2026;16(1):18988. doi: 10.1038/s41598-026-49604-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [23].World Medical Association . World Medical association declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for Medical research involving human participants. JAMA. 2025;333(1):71–74. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.21972 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [24].Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, et al. The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016;315(8):801–810. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0287 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [25].Thaler B, Hohensinner PJ, Krychtiuk KA, et al. Differential in vivo activation of monocyte subsets during low-grade inflammation through experimental endotoxemia in humans. Sci Rep. 2016;6(1):30162. doi: 10.1038/srep30162 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [26].Patel AA, Zhang Y, Fullerton JN, et al. The fate and lifespan of human monocyte subsets in steady state and systemic inflammation. J Exp Med. 2017;214(7):1913–1923. doi: 10.1084/jem.20170355 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [27].Kapellos TS, Bonaguro L, Gemünd I, et al. Human monocyte subsets and phenotypes in Major Chronic inflammatory diseases. Front Immunol. 2019;10:2035. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.02035 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [28].Skinner NA, MacIsaac M, Hamilton JA, et al. Regulation of Toll-like receptor (TLR)2 and TLR4 on CD14dimCD16+ monocytes in response to sepsis-related antigens. Clin Exp Immunol. 2005;141(2):270–278. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2249.2005.02839.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [29].Zhao Y, Xu P, Guo L, et al. Tumor necrosis factor-α blockade corrects monocyte/Macrophage imbalance in primary immune thrombocytopenia. Thromb Haemost. 2021;121(06):767–781. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1722186 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [30].Li X, Yuan X, Wang C. The clinical value of IL-3, IL-4, IL-12p70, IL17A, IFN-γ, MIP-1β, NLR, P-selectin, and TNF-α in differentiating bloodstream infections caused by gram-negative, gram-positive bacteria and fungi in hospitalized patients: an observational study. Med (Baltim). 2019;98(38):e17315. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000017315 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [31].Hotchkiss RS, Monneret G, Payen D. Sepsis-induced immunosuppression: from cellular dysfunctions to immunotherapy. Nat Rev Immunol. 2013;13(12):862–874. doi: 10.1038/nri3552 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [32].Terradas R, Grau S, Blanch J, et al. Eosinophil count and neutrophil-lymphocyte count ratio as prognostic markers in patients with bacteremia: a retrospective cohort study. PLOS ONE. 2012;7(8):e42860. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0042860 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [33].Hassani M, Leijte G, Bruse N, et al. Differentiation and activation of eosinophils in the human bone marrow during experimental human endotoxemia. J Leukoc Biol. 2020;108(5):1665–1671. doi: 10.1002/JLB.1AB1219-493R [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [34].Mukherjee R, Kanti Barman P, Kumar Thatoi P, et al. Non-classical monocytes display inflammatory features: validation in sepsis and systemic lupus erythematous. Sci Rep. 2015;5(1):13886. doi: 10.1038/srep13886 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [35].Liu Q, Liu X, Hu B, et al. Diagnostic performance and clinical impact of blood metagenomic next-generation sequencing in ICU patients suspected monomicrobial and polymicrobial bloodstream infections. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2023;13:1192931. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2023.1192931 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [36].Johan C. Dataset of the paper: differences in circulating levels of non-classical monocytes and associated caspase 1 activation during Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli bacteremia 2026. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.18803777 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are openly available in « Dataset of the paper : Differences in circulating levels of Non-Classical Monocytes and associated caspase 1 activation during Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli bacteremia » at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18803777 [36].
