Skip to main content
Biophysics Reports logoLink to Biophysics Reports
. 2026 Oct 31;12(5):369–386. doi: 10.52601/bpr.2025.250050

Screening for putative essential genes in Brucella abortus strains A19 and S2308 using transposon mutagenesis

Siwei Guo 1,#, Weidong Bu 2,#, Fangfang Guo 2,#, Dianyu Li 1, Liyuan Liu 1, Xiaxia Liu 1, Yuefeng Chu 1,*, Jian Xu 1,*
PMCID: PMC13740972  PMID: 42997144

Abstract

Brucella is a zoonotic pathogen that causes substantial economic losses in the livestock industry. However, the categorization of functional genes in Brucella requires further refinement. This knowledge gap was addressed by classifying gene essentiality through constructing a transposon mutant library. Mariner transposon mutant libraries were independently constructed for Brucella abortus A19 and S2308. Transposon sequencing was used to visualize the insertion sites within the mutant library, which revealed a uniform transposon distribution in both genomes and high library saturation. Furthermore, 451 and 393 putative essential genes were identified for B. abortus A19 and S2308, respectively. The functional enrichment analysis of these genes revealed that cofactor biosynthesis was the most highly represented, followed by ribosomal biogenesis, carbon metabolism, amino acid biosynthesis, and oxidative phosphorylation. Many of these genes encode known antimicrobial drug targets. This study provides a foundational resource for Brucella research, and the mutant library serves as a tool for screening functional Brucella genes.

Keywords: Brucella, Transposon mutant library, Transposon sequencing (Tn-seq), Essential genes

INTRODUCTION

Brucella belongs to the phylum Proteobacteria and is a facultative intracellular parasite with a Gram-negative coccobacillus morphology (Corbel 1997). Brucella lacks endospores, capsules, and flagella. Brucellosis is caused by Brucella and is thus one of the most important zoonoses worldwide (Hasanjani Roushan and Ebrahimpour 2015). Brucellosis causes abortion and fever, posing serious threats to human and animal health. Brucella is classified into six species and 19 biovars based on pathogenicity and biochemical characteristics, among others (Abdallah et al. 2003). Brucella melitensis, Brucella abortus, and Brucella suis are the most prevalent and pathogenic (Alakavuklar et al. 2023). B. abortus A19 (vaccine strain) and S2308 (virulent wild-type strain) were selected for comparative analysis.

The persistent global burden of brucellosis underscores critical gaps in our understanding of Brucella biology. Decades of research have yet to fully elucidate the genetic requirements underlying bacterial survival and pathogenesis — knowledge essential for developing novel therapeutic interventions. Essential genes, defined as those indispensables for growth and survival under specific conditions, represent particularly attractive drug targets as their disruption proves lethal to the pathogen. Systematic identification of these genes therefore provides dual benefits: advancing fundamental understanding of bacterial physiology while revealing vulnerabilities for therapeutic exploitation.

Essential genes are genes that are crucial for the growth and survival of organisms under specific environmental conditions. The methods of identifying essential genes include single-gene knockout, RNA interference, CRISPR/Cas9, and transposon mutagenesis (Hayes 2003). In this study, we constructed a transposon mutant library for screening in B. abortus strains A19 and S2308.

A transposon is a discrete DNA segment capable of expressing its transposase. A transposon enzyme recognizes the terminal inverted repeats (TIRs) flanking the transposon, mediates transposon excision, and facilitates transposon transposition within the genome (Kleckner et al. 1975). Transposons can be transferred from a donor to a recipient genome via insertion between specific base pairs and are heritable genetic elements (Craig 1997). Transposons have been progressively used for screening the genes of prokaryotic and eukaryotic organisms since the initial discovery of transposons in the maize genome in the 1940s and the construction of the synthetic Tc1/Mariner-type transposon Sleeping Beauty in the late 20th century (van Opijnen and Camilli 2013).

Different transposon types exhibit distinct insertion site preferences: the Mariner transposon randomly inserts into thymine (T)–adenine (A) dinucleotide sites (Cain et al. 2020). Mu and Tn5 transposons exhibit a preference for inserting into DNA sequences containing guanine (G) and cytosine (C). The Tn7 insertion pattern is more random, showing a slight preference for A- and T-rich sequences (Green et al. 2012). The PiggyBac transposon is active in mammalian cells and randomly inserts at TTAA tetranucleotide junctions (Ding et al. 2005).

Highly random transposons are typically selected in molecular biology experiments for constructing highly saturated mutant libraries, ensuring the reliability of the subsequent analyses (Gray et al. 2015). Tn5 or Mariner transposons are commonly used for constructing bacterial transposon mutant libraries (Guo et al. 2013). Antibiotics are selected, and each bacterium within the mutant library typically harbors only a single transposon insertion site, enabling tens of thousands of mutant clones to be generated. We used the Mariner transposon to construct a saturated mutant library of B. abortus A19 and S2308.

Transposon insertion sites must be precisely mapped after constructing a random transposon mutant library. Transposon insertion sequencing (TIS) was developed for this task. TIS is a methodology that combines all transposon insertion mutations with high-throughput sequencing to assess the role and essentiality of each gene within the bacterial genome (Barquist et al. 2013). TIS enables the direct sequencing of transposon-flanking regions, simultaneously allowing individual insertion sites to be precisely identified and genomic regions devoid of insertions to be identified. Most or all nonessential genes are expected to harbor transposon insertions in a saturated mutant library; genes lacking insertions are highly likely to be essential. The library can be subjected to selective growth conditions, such as nutrient limitation; the library can be sequenced before and after selective pressure to determine the relative abundance of each mutant. This process facilitates the analysis of gene–phenotype associations under specific conditions (Chao et al. 2016).

Transposon sequencing (Tn-seq) is a specific implementation of TIS (van Opijnen and Camilli 2013). Tn-seq is commonly used for sequencing bacterial mutant libraries constructed using Mariner or Tn5 transposons. The type IIS restriction enzyme Mmel was originally used in Tn-seq to digest extracted genomic DNA from the mutant library (Morgan et al. 2009). However, this approach generated heterogeneous fragment sizes, some of which could be lost during the subsequent purification or PCR steps, biasing the sequencing results. The current commercial Tn-seq protocols typically involve the use of random fragmentation to shear genomic DNA into 200–500 bp fragments, mitigating the impact of size heterogeneity (Friedrich et al. 2017). The Tn-seq leverages massively parallel sequencing, providing highly reproducible and sensitive results. Tn-seq approach allows the contributions of gene fitness contributions in specific environments to be identified without relying on preconstructed knockout arrays (van Opijnen et al. 2009).

We employed a Mariner transposon system delivered via bacterial conjugation to construct mutant libraries of B. abortus strains A19 and S2308. The subsequent Tn-seq analysis enabled the genome-wide classification of gene essentiality and the preliminary characterization of essential genes.

RESULTS

Construction and sequencing analysis of mutant library

The results of three independent conjugation experiments showed that comprehensive transposon insertion libraries were successfully constructed, yielding 84,000 and 64,000 random mutant colonies of B. abortus strains A19 and S2308, respectively. Representative aliquots from each library were subjected to high-throughput sequencing analysis following standard quality control procedures. Sequencing generated 17,801,501 and 16,098,379 high-quality reads for the B. abortus A19 and S2308 libraries, respectively, with Q30 scores of 85.2% and 85.0%, respectively. This result confirmed that both libraries met the established quality standards for downstream analysis.

The B. abortus A19 genome contains 59,925 TA dinucleotide sites within the annotated open reading frames that are potential transposon insertion targets. The results of comprehensive sequencing analysis identified successful transposon insertions at 41,975 TA sites, covering 70.04% of the insertions across the genome. This high insertion frequency demonstrated that the mutant library was nearly saturated, providing robust coverage for determining essentiality (Xiao et al. 2023). Similarly, the B. abortus S2308 genome harbored 59,789 TA dinucleotide sites within open reading frames, with 37,444 confirmed insertion events detected through sequencing analysis, confirming that this library was also adequately saturated for reliably assessing gene essentiality.

The results of the statistical analysis of the TA site insertion frequencies revealed distinct bimodal distribution characteristics in the saturated transposon libraries. Genes with low and high insertion rates in the B. abortus A19 library formed well-separated, nonoverlapping populations at opposite extremes of the distribution spectrum. The saturation characteristics of the B. abortus S2308 library were broadly similar to those of the A19 library, albeit at a somewhat lower level. This difference is likely attributable to the smaller size of the S2308 library (Fig. 1). The genes with consistently low insertion frequencies (<20%) were predominantly essential for bacterial viability, whereas genes tolerating high insertion rates (>80%) were classified as nonessential for growth under standard laboratory conditions (Yang et al. 2017).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Histogram showing the percentage of TA loci disrupted per gene in the B. abortus strain A19 (A) and S2308 (B) transposon insertion library. The x-axis shows the percentage of TA sites per gene that contain a transposon insertion in the B. abortus mutant library. The y-axis shows the number of genes corresponding to each proportion bin. E: essential based on Gumbel; EB: essential based on binomial; NE: non-essential; S: too short; U: uncertain

The insertion site data were comprehensively visualized using TRANSIT software (version 3.0.1), generating circular genome maps that simultaneously displayed read counts per insertion site, essential gene annotations, nonessential gene classifications, and genes of undetermined essentiality (Fig. 2). These results demonstrated the absence of insertion bias across nonessential genomic regions and indicated the markedly reduced or absent insertion densities within essential gene loci, confirming the reliability of the gene essentiality classifications.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Circular maps of all transposon insertion sites in B. abortus genomes of strains A19 and S2308. The outer to inner circles are scale marks of the genome (Mb), coding sequences on the forward strand, coding sequences on the reverse strand, and number of inserted reads per locus from the input, expressed in lg10. The colors in the status labels represent the types of genomic features in the innermost circle of the circular map. E: essential based on Gumbel; EB: essential based on binomial; NE: non-essential; S: too short; U: uncertain. A,B Transposon insertion sites on B. abortus A19 chromosomes. C,D Transposon insertion sites on B. abortus S2308 chromosomes

The genes were quantitatively categorized using Gumbel statistical analysis, identifying 451, 2428, 82, and 211 essential genes, nonessential genes, genes of ambiguous essentiality, and genes with insufficient sequences for reliable analysis, respectively, in B. abortus A19. This analysis of B. abortus S2308 revealed 393 essential genes, 2466 nonessential genes, 98 ambiguous genes, and 212 genes with inadequate sequence lengths for classification (Fig. 3). The distribution of the essential genes across the bipartite Brucella genome showed pronounced chromosomal bias, with 398 of the 451 essential genes (88.2%) localized on chromosome I (Chr1) and 53 genes (11.8%) on chromosome II (Chr2) in B. abortus A19. B. abortus S2308 similarly displayed comparable distribution patterns, with 347 of the 393 essential genes (88.3%) residing on Chr1 and 46 genes (11.7%) residing on Chr2.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Quantitative distribution of gene functional categories in the B. abortus A19 (A) and S2308 (B) genomes

A detailed examination of the transposon insertion patterns within the putative essential genes revealed varying degrees of insertion tolerance. A total of 287 of the 451 (63.6%) candidate essential genes in B. abortus A19 contained zero transposon insertions, 150 (33.3%) harbored fewer than five insertions, and 14 (3.1%) contained more than five insertion events. Comparable patterns were observed in B. abortus S2308, where insertions were completely absent in 253 genes (64.4%), 131 genes (33.3%) contained fewer than five insertions, and 9 genes (2.3%) harbored more than five insertion events. The persistence of transposon insertions within certain essential genes likely reflects insertions occurring proximal to stop codons that do not disrupt critical gene function, which is consistent with the established principles of transposon mutagenesis.

Functions of essential genes

The functional enrichment of the putative essential genes identified in B. abortus strains A19 and S2308 through Gumbel analysis was comprehensively analyzed using the clusterProfiler package (version 4.14.6). The results revealed that these genes are predominantly associated with five core biological processes: cofactor biosynthesis, ribosomal biogenesis, carbon metabolism, amino acid biosynthesis, and oxidative phosphorylation (Tables 1–5). The enrichment profiles of B. abortus A19 and S2308 were similar, indicating conserved essential gene functions between these strains (Fig. 4).

Table 1. Genes associated with cofactor biosynthesis identified via KEGG enrichment analysis.

Gene_ID Gene Annotation

B. abortus A19

DR186_RS02480

fabG

3-Oxoacyl-[acyl-carrier-protein] reductase

DR186_RS02500

fabF

Beta-ketoacyl-ACP synthase II

DR186_RS03970

hemB

Porphobilinogen synthase

DR186_RS04855

-

NAD kinase

DR186_RS05220

-

NAD+ synthase

DR186_RS05310

folP

Dihydropteroate synthase

DR186_RS05315

folB

Dihydroneopterin aldolase

DR186_RS05320

folK

2-Amino-4-hydroxy-6-hydroxymethyldihydropteridine diphosphokinase

DR186_RS05560

folE

GTP cyclohydrolase I FolE

DR186_RS05845

lipA

Lipoyl synthase

DR186_RS05980

fabZ

3-Hydroxyacyl-ACP dehydratase FabZ

DR186_RS07155

-

Dihydrofolate reductase

DR186_RS07600

carA

Glutamine-hydrolyzing carbamoyl-phosphate synthase small subunit

DR186_RS07620

carB

Carbamoyl-phosphate synthase large subunit

DR186_RS07930

hemF

Oxygen-dependent coproporphyrinogen oxidase

DR186_RS08585

-

Adenylosuccinate synthase

DR186_RS08925

-

Thiamine diphosphokinase

DR186_RS09320

-

Nicotinate-nucleotide adenylyltransferase

DR186_RS09495

ubiG

Bifunctional 2-polyprenyl-6-hydroxyphenol methylase/3-demethylubiquinol 3-O-methyltransferase UbiG

DR186_RS09555

hemC

Hydroxymethylbilane synthase

DR186_RS10440

hemJ

Protoporphyrinogen oxidase HemJ

DR186_RS10445

hemE

Uroporphyrinogen decarboxylase

DR186_RS10470

coaE

Dephospho-CoA kinase

DR186_RS10555

coaA

Type I pantothenate kinase

DR186_RS10905

metK

Methionine adenosyltransferase

DR186_RS10965

fabB

Beta-ketoacyl-ACP synthase I

DR186_RS10650

-

Folylpolyglutamate synthase/dihydrofolate synthase family protein

DR186_RS01815

hemA

5-Aminolevulinate synthase

DR186_RS06015

pyrH

UMP kinase

DR186_RS09550

-

Uroporphyrinogen-III synthase

DR186_RS03995

glyA

Serine hydroxymethyltransferase

DR186_RS05705

coaD

Pantetheine-phosphate adenylyltransferase

DR186_RS02275

ubiA

4-hydroxybenzoate octaprenyltransferase

DR186_RS04010

-

Riboflavin synthase

DR186_RS09610

-

Ubiquinone biosynthesis hydroxylase

DR186_RS04815

-

Cysteine desulfurase family protein

DR186_RS00585

pncB

Nicotinate phosphoribosyltransferase

DR186_RS03635

ndk

Nucleoside-diphosphate kinase

DR186_RS05895

-

CTP synthase

DR186_RS12010

-

Bifunctional riboflavin kinase/FAD synthetase

DR186_RS13325

folD

Bifunctional methylenetetrahydrofolate dehydrogenase/methenyltetrahydrofolate cyclohydrolase FolD

DR186_RS14195

-

Aspartate carbamoyltransferase catalytic subunit

DR186_RS14245

lipB

Lipoyl(octanoyl) transferase LipB

DR186_RS16105

ubiE

Bifunctional demethylmenaquinone methyltransferase/2-methoxy-6-polyprenyl-1%2C4-benzoquinol methylase UbiE

DR186_RS13420

-

Glutamate--cysteine ligase

DR186_RS11415

hemH

Ferrochelatase

DR186_RS16095

coaBC

Bifunctional phosphopantothenoylcysteine decarboxylase/phosphopantothenate--cysteine ligase CoaBC

B. abortus S2308

BAB_RS16450

pncB

Nicotinate phosphoribosyltransferase

BAB_RS17600

hemA

5-Aminolevulinate synthase

BAB_RS18030

ubiA

4-Hydroxybenzoate octaprenyltransferase

BAB_RS18225

fabG

3-Oxoacyl-[acyl-carrier-protein] reductase

BAB_RS18235

fabF

Beta-ketoacyl-ACP synthase II

BAB_RS19675

glyA

Serine hydroxymethyltransferase

BAB_RS19685

ribD

Bifunctional diaminohydroxyphosphoribosylaminopyrimidine deaminase/5-amino-6-(5-phosphoribosylamino)uracil reductase RibD

BAB_RS19690

-

Riboflavin synthase

BAB_RS20070

purB

Adenylosuccinate lyase

BAB_RS20505

-

NAD kinase

BAB_RS20875

-

NAD+ synthase

BAB_RS20880

gltX

Glutamate--tRNA ligase

BAB_RS20950

folP

Dihydropteroate synthase

BAB_RS20955

folB

Dihydroneopterin aldolase

BAB_RS20960

folK

2-Amino-4-hydroxy-6-hydroxymethyldihydropteridine diphosphokinase

BAB_RS21170

folE

GTP cyclohydrolase I FolE

BAB_RS21285

coaD

Pantetheine-phosphate adenylyltransferase

BAB_RS21415

lipA

Lipoyl synthase

BAB_RS21545

fabZ

3-Hydroxyacyl-ACP dehydratase FabZ

BAB_RS21580

pyrH

UMP kinase

BAB_RS22685

-

Dihydrofolate reductase

BAB_RS23085

carA

Glutamine-hydrolyzing carbamoyl-phosphate synthase small subunit

BAB_RS23105

carB

Carbamoyl-phosphate synthase large subunit

BAB_RS23385

hemF

Oxygen-dependent coproporphyrinogen oxidase

BAB_RS24715

-

Nicotinate-nucleotide adenylyltransferase

BAB_RS24870

ubiG

Bifunctional 2-polyprenyl-6-hydroxyphenol methylase/3-demethylubiquinol 3-O-methyltransferase UbiG

BAB_RS24930

-

Uroporphyrinogen-III synthase

BAB_RS24935

hemC

Hydroxymethylbilane synthase

BAB_RS24990

-

Ubiquinone biosynthesis hydroxylase

BAB_RS25770

hemJ

Protoporphyrinogen oxidase HemJ

BAB_RS25775

hemE

Uroporphyrinogen decarboxylase

BAB_RS25880

coaA

Type I pantothenate kinase

BAB_RS25960

-

Bifunctional folylpolyglutamate synthase/dihydrofolate synthase

BAB_RS26220

metK

Methionine adenosyltransferase

BAB_RS26285

fabB

Beta-ketoacyl-ACP synthase I

BAB_RS27285

-

Bifunctional riboflavin kinase/FAD synthetase

BAB_RS28550

folD

Bifunctional methylenetetrahydrofolate dehydrogenase/methenyltetrahydrofolate cyclohydrolase FolD

BAB_RS29425

lipB

Lipoyl(octanoyl) transferase LipB

BAB_RS31170

coaBC

Bifunctional phosphopantothenoylcysteine decarboxylase/phosphopantothenate--cysteine ligase CoaBC

BAB_RS31180

ubiE

Bifunctional demethylmenaquinone methyltransferase/2-methoxy-6-polyprenyl-1%2C4-benzoquinol methylase UbiE

Table 5. Genes associated with oxidative phosphorylation identified via KEGG enrichment analysis.

Gene_ID Gene Annotation
B. abortus A19
DR186_RS02120 - F0F1 ATP synthase subunit A
DR186_RS02130 - F0F1 ATP synthase subunit B
DR186_RS04195 - NADH-quinone oxidoreductase subunit A
DR186_RS04200 - NADH-quinone oxidoreductase subunit B family protein
DR186_RS04205 - NADH-quinone oxidoreductase subunit C
DR186_RS04210 - NADH-quinone oxidoreductase subunit D
DR186_RS04215 nuoE NADH-quinone oxidoreductase subunit NuoE
DR186_RS04220 nuoF NADH-quinone oxidoreductase subunit NuoF
DR186_RS04225 nuoG NADH-quinone oxidoreductase subunit NuoG
DR186_RS04230 nuoH NADH-quinone oxidoreductase subunit NuoH
DR186_RS04235 nuoI NADH-quinone oxidoreductase subunit NuoI
DR186_RS04240 - NADH-quinone oxidoreductase subunit J
DR186_RS04245 nuoK NADH-quinone oxidoreductase subunit NuoK
DR186_RS04250 nuoL NADH-quinone oxidoreductase subunit L
DR186_RS04260 nuoN NADH-quinone oxidoreductase subunit NuoN
DR186_RS09115 - F0F1 ATP synthase subunit gamma
DR186_RS09630 sdhA Succinate dehydrogenase flavoprotein subunit
DR186_RS09120 atpA F0F1 ATP synthase subunit alpha
DR186_RS09625 - Succinate dehydrogenase iron-sulfur subunit
DR186_RS09110 atpD F0F1 ATP synthase subunit beta
DR186_RS10090 ppa Inorganic diphosphatase
DR186_RS09635 sdhD Succinate dehydrogenase%2C hydrophobic membrane anchor protein
DR186_RS09640 sdhC Succinate dehydrogenase%2C cytochrome b556 subunit
DR186_RS02125 - F0F1 ATP synthase subunit C
DR186_RS04255 - NADH-quinone oxidoreductase subunit M
DR186_RS09125 - F0F1 ATP synthase subunit delta
B. abortus S2308
BAB_RS17890 - F0F1 ATP synthase subunit A
BAB_RS17895 - F0F1 ATP synthase subunit C
BAB_RS17900 - F0F1 ATP synthase subunit B
BAB_RS19860 - NuoB/complex I 20 kDa subunit family protein
BAB_RS19865 - NADH-quinone oxidoreductase subunit C
BAB_RS19870 - NADH-quinone oxidoreductase subunit D
BAB_RS19875 nuoE NADH-quinone oxidoreductase subunit NuoE
BAB_RS19880 nuoF NADH-quinone oxidoreductase subunit NuoF
BAB_RS19885 nuoG NADH-quinone oxidoreductase subunit NuoG
BAB_RS19890 nuoH NADH-quinone oxidoreductase subunit NuoH
BAB_RS19895 nuoI NADH-quinone oxidoreductase subunit NuoI
BAB_RS19900 - NADH-quinone oxidoreductase subunit J
BAB_RS19905 nuoK NADH-quinone oxidoreductase subunit NuoK
BAB_RS19910 nuoL NADH-quinone oxidoreductase subunit L
BAB_RS19915 - NADH-quinone oxidoreductase subunit M
BAB_RS19920 nuoN NADH-quinone oxidoreductase subunit NuoN
BAB_RS24515 atpD F0F1 ATP synthase subunit beta
BAB_RS24520 - F0F1 ATP synthase subunit gamma
BAB_RS24525 atpA F0F1 ATP synthase subunit alpha
BAB_RS24530 - F0F1 ATP synthase subunit delta
BAB_RS25000 - Succinate dehydrogenase iron-sulfur subunit
BAB_RS25005 sdhA Succinate dehydrogenase flavoprotein subunit
BAB_RS25015 sdhC Succinate dehydrogenase%2C cytochrome b556 subunit
BAB_RS25435 ppa Inorganic diphosphatase

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Functional categorization of putative essential genes in B. abortus strains A19 (A) and S2308 (B) determined through KEGG enrichment analysis

Table 2. Genes associated with ribosomal biogenesis identified via KEGG enrichment analysis.

Gene_ID Gene Annotation
B. abortus A19
DR186_RS02465 rpsF 30S ribosomal protein S6
DR186_RS04130 rplM 50S ribosomal protein L13
DR186_RS04320 rpsD 30S ribosomal protein S4
DR186_RS06025 rpsB 30S ribosomal protein S2
DR186_RS06260 rpsM 30S ribosomal protein S13
DR186_RS06285 rpsE 30S ribosomal protein S5
DR186_RS06290 rplR 50S ribosomal protein L18
DR186_RS06295 rplF 50S ribosomal protein L6
DR186_RS06305 rpsN 30S ribosomal protein S14
DR186_RS06310 rplE 50S ribosomal protein L5
DR186_RS06330 rpmC 50S ribosomal protein L29
DR186_RS06335 rplP 50S ribosomal protein L16
DR186_RS06340 rpsC 30S ribosomal protein S3
DR186_RS06345 rplV 50S ribosomal protein L22
DR186_RS06350 rpsS 30S ribosomal protein S19
DR186_RS06355 rplB 50S ribosomal protein L2
DR186_RS06360 - 50S ribosomal protein L23
DR186_RS06365 rplD 50S ribosomal protein L4
DR186_RS06370 rplC 50S ribosomal protein L3
DR186_RS06390 rpsG 30S ribosomal protein S7
DR186_RS06395 rpsL 30S ribosomal protein S12
DR186_RS06420 rplJ 50S ribosomal protein L10
DR186_RS06425 rplA 50S ribosomal protein L1
DR186_RS06430 rplK 50S ribosomal protein L11
DR186_RS07860 - 50S ribosomal protein L25/general stress protein Ctc
DR186_RS09355 rpmA 50S ribosomal protein L27
DR186_RS09360 rplU 50S ribosomal protein L21
DR186_RS10190 rpmB 50S ribosomal protein L28
DR186_RS10945 rpsO 30S ribosomal protein S15
DR186_RS06240 rplQ 50S ribosomal protein L17
DR186_RS06300 rpsH 30S ribosomal protein S8
DR186_RS00145 rpsA 30S ribosomal protein S1
DR186_RS10720 rplT 50S ribosomal protein L20
DR186_RS09660 rplS 50S ribosomal protein L19
DR186_RS06280 rpmD 50S ribosomal protein L30
DR186_RS06315 rplX 50S ribosomal protein L24
DR186_RS06325 rpsQ 30S ribosomal protein S17
DR186_RS06375 rpsJ 30S ribosomal protein S10
DR186_RS09010 rpmF 50S ribosomal protein L32
DR186_RS09225 rpsP 30S ribosomal protein S16
B. abortus S2308
BAB_RS16055 rpsA 30S ribosomal protein S1
BAB_RS19990 rpsD 30S ribosomal protein S4
BAB_RS21590 rpsB 30S ribosomal protein S2
BAB_RS21795 rplQ 50S ribosomal protein L17
BAB_RS21805 rpsK 30S ribosomal protein S11
BAB_RS21810 rpsM 30S ribosomal protein S13
BAB_RS21830 rpmD 50S ribosomal protein L30
BAB_RS21835 rpsE 30S ribosomal protein S5
BAB_RS21840 rplR 50S ribosomal protein L18
BAB_RS21845 rplF 50S ribosomal protein L6
BAB_RS21850 rpsH 30S ribosomal protein S8
BAB_RS21855 rpsN 30S ribosomal protein S14
BAB_RS21860 rplE 50S ribosomal protein L5
BAB_RS21865 rplX 50S ribosomal protein L24
BAB_RS21870 rplN 50S ribosomal protein L14
BAB_RS21875 rpsQ 30S ribosomal protein S17
BAB_RS21885 rplP 50S ribosomal protein L16
BAB_RS21890 rpsC 30S ribosomal protein S3
BAB_RS21895 rplV 50S ribosomal protein L22
BAB_RS21900 rpsS 30S ribosomal protein S19
BAB_RS21905 rplB 50S ribosomal protein L2
BAB_RS21910 - 50S ribosomal protein L23
BAB_RS21920 rplC 50S ribosomal protein L3
BAB_RS21940 rpsG 30S ribosomal protein S7
BAB_RS21945 rpsL 30S ribosomal protein S12
BAB_RS21970 rplJ 50S ribosomal protein L10
BAB_RS21975 rplA 50S ribosomal protein L1
BAB_RS21980 rplK 50S ribosomal protein L11
BAB_RS23315 - 50S ribosomal protein L25/general stress protein Ctc
BAB_RS24420 rpmF 50S ribosomal protein L32
BAB_RS24630 rpsP 30S ribosomal protein S16
BAB_RS25030 rplS 50S ribosomal protein L19
BAB_RS25530 rpmB 50S ribosomal protein L28

Table 3. Genes associated with carbon metabolism identified via KEGG enrichment analysis.

Gene_ID Gene Annotation
B. abortus A19
DR186_RS01655 pgi Glucose-6-phosphate isomerase
DR186_RS04415 rpe Ribulose-phosphate 3-epimerase
DR186_RS04705 accC Acetyl-CoA carboxylase biotin carboxylase subunit
DR186_RS04710 accB Acetyl-CoA carboxylase biotin carboxyl carrier protein
DR186_RS05195 rpiA Ribose-5-phosphate isomerase RpiA
DR186_RS05870 pdhA Pyruvate dehydrogenase (acetyl-transferring) E1 component subunit alpha
DR186_RS05960 gltA Citrate synthase
DR186_RS07125 serB Phosphoserine phosphatase SerB
DR186_RS07845 - Ribose-phosphate pyrophosphokinase
DR186_RS08790 gap Type I glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase
DR186_RS09140 fsa Fructose-6-phosphate aldolase
DR186_RS09630 sdhA Succinate dehydrogenase flavoprotein subunit
DR186_RS09735 odhB

2-Oxoglutarate dehydrogenase complex dihydrolipoyllysine-residue succinyltransferase

DR186_RS09745 sucD Succinate--CoA ligase subunit alpha
DR186_RS09750 sucC ADP-forming succinate--CoA ligase subunit beta
DR186_RS09755 mdh Malate dehydrogenase
DR186_RS10655 accD Acetyl-CoA carboxylase%2C carboxyltransferase subunit beta
DR186_RS08785 tkt Transketolase
DR186_RS09740 - 2-Oxoglutarate dehydrogenase E1 component
DR186_RS06200 - NADP-dependent isocitrate dehydrogenase
DR186_RS05860 - Pyruvate dehydrogenase complex dihydrolipoamide acetyltransferase
DR186_RS09625 - Succinate dehydrogenase iron-sulfur subunit
DR186_RS10275 - Acetyl-CoA carboxylase carboxyltransferase subunit alpha
DR186_RS00485 acnA Aconitate hydratase AcnA
DR186_RS05865 - Pyruvate dehydrogenase complex E1 component subunit beta
DR186_RS05885 eno Phosphopyruvate hydratase
DR186_RS03995 glyA Serine hydroxymethyltransferase
DR186_RS09635 sdhD Succinate dehydrogenase%2C hydrophobic membrane anchor protein
DR186_RS06505 cysE Serine O-acetyltransferase
DR186_RS09640 sdhC Succinate dehydrogenase%2C cytochrome b556 subunit
DR186_RS05445 - Cysteine synthase A
DR186_RS13325 folD

Bifunctional methylenetetrahydrofolate dehydrogenase/methenyltetrahydrofolate cyclohydrolase FolD

DR186_RS13335 pgl 6-Phosphogluconolactonase
DR186_RS13340 zwf Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase
DR186_RS11575 gndA NADP-dependent phosphogluconate dehydrogenase
B. abortus S2308
BAB_RS16360 acnA Aconitate hydratase AcnA
BAB_RS17440 pgi Glucose-6-phosphate isomerase
BAB_RS19675 glyA Serine hydroxymethyltransferase
BAB_RS20075 rpe Ribulose-phosphate 3-epimerase
BAB_RS20350 accC Acetyl-CoA carboxylase biotin carboxylase subunit
BAB_RS20355 accB Acetyl-CoA carboxylase biotin carboxyl carrier protein
BAB_RS20890 - NADP-dependent malic enzyme
BAB_RS21430 - Pyruvate dehydrogenase complex dihydrolipoamide acetyltransferase
BAB_RS21435 - Pyruvate dehydrogenase complex E1 component subunit beta
BAB_RS21440 pdhA Pyruvate dehydrogenase (acetyl-transferring) E1 component subunit alpha
BAB_RS21455 eno Phosphopyruvate hydratase
BAB_RS21525 gltA Citrate synthase
BAB_RS21755 - NADP-dependent isocitrate dehydrogenase
BAB_RS22655 serB Phosphoserine phosphatase SerB
BAB_RS23305 - Ribose-phosphate pyrophosphokinase
BAB_RS24225 tkt Transketolase
BAB_RS24230 gap Type I glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase
BAB_RS25000 - Succinate dehydrogenase iron-sulfur subunit
BAB_RS25005 sdhA Succinate dehydrogenase flavoprotein subunit
BAB_RS25015 sdhC Succinate dehydrogenase%2C cytochrome b556 subunit
BAB_RS25105 odhB

2-Oxoglutarate dehydrogenase complex dihydrolipoyllysine-residue succinyltransferase

BAB_RS25110 - 2-Oxoglutarate dehydrogenase E1 component
BAB_RS25115 sucD Succinate--CoA ligase subunit alpha
BAB_RS25120 sucC ADP-forming succinate--CoA ligase subunit beta
BAB_RS25125 mdh Malate dehydrogenase
BAB_RS25605 - Acetyl-CoA carboxylase carboxyltransferase subunit alpha
BAB_RS25965 accD Acetyl-CoA carboxylase%2C carboxyltransferase subunit beta
BAB_RS26870 gndA NADP-dependent phosphogluconate dehydrogenase
BAB_RS28550 folD

Bifunctional methylenetetrahydrofolate dehydrogenase/methenyltetrahydrofolate cyclohydrolase FolD

BAB_RS28565 zwf Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase

Table 4. Genes associated with amino acid biosynthesis identified via KEGG enrichment analysis.

Gene_ID Gene Annotation
B. abortus A19
DR186_RS00130 aroA 3-Phosphoshikimate 1-carboxyvinyltransferase
DR186_RS01735 argF Ornithine carbamoyltransferase
DR186_RS02625 thrC Threonine synthase
DR186_RS03405 dapA 4-Hydroxy-tetrahydrodipicolinate synthase
DR186_RS04415 rpe Ribulose-phosphate 3-epimerase
DR186_RS04715 aroQ Type II 3-dehydroquinate dehydratase
DR186_RS05195 rpiA Ribose-5-phosphate isomerase RpiA
DR186_RS05960 gltA Citrate synthase
DR186_RS07125 serB Phosphoserine phosphatase SerB
DR186_RS07650 - Pyridoxal phosphate-dependent aminotransferase
DR186_RS07845 - Ribose-phosphate pyrophosphokinase
DR186_RS08790 gap Type I glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase
DR186_RS09140 fsa Fructose-6-phosphate aldolase
DR186_RS09230 - Chorismate mutase
DR186_RS09325 - Glutamate-5-semialdehyde dehydrogenase
DR186_RS09490 - Aspartate kinase
DR186_RS09780 dapF Diaminopimelate epimerase
DR186_RS10905 metK Methionine adenosyltransferase
DR186_RS08785 tkt Transketolase
DR186_RS06200 - NADP-dependent isocitrate dehydrogenase
DR186_RS07110 - Acetolactate synthase 3 large subunit
DR186_RS04115 argC N-acetyl-gamma-glutamyl-phosphate reductase
DR186_RS05170 glnA Type I glutamate--ammonia ligase
DR186_RS00485 acnA Aconitate hydratase AcnA
DR186_RS02330 aroC Chorismate synthase
DR186_RS05885 eno Phosphopyruvate hydratase
DR186_RS03995 glyA Serine hydroxymethyltransferase
DR186_RS06505 cysE Serine O-acetyltransferase
DR186_RS10255 aroB 3-Dehydroquinate synthase
DR186_RS01730 - Aspartate aminotransferase family protein
DR186_RS05210 - Class II 3-deoxy-7-phosphoheptulonate synthase
DR186_RS05445 - Cysteine synthase A
DR186_RS10020 argH Argininosuccinate lyase
DR186_RS15915 dapD 2%2C3%2C4%2C5-tetrahydropyridine-2%2C6-dicarboxylate N-succinyltransferase
DR186_RS15900 argB Acetylglutamate kinase
DR186_RS15925 dapE Succinyl-diaminopimelate desuccinylase
B. abortus S2308
BAB_RS16045 aroA 3-Phosphoshikimate 1-carboxyvinyltransferase
BAB_RS16360 acnA Aconitate hydratase AcnA
BAB_RS17510 - Aspartate aminotransferase family protein
BAB_RS18350 thrC Threonine synthase
BAB_RS19125 dapA 4-Hydroxy-tetrahydrodipicolinate synthase
BAB_RS19675 glyA Serine hydroxymethyltransferase
BAB_RS20075 rpe Ribulose-phosphate 3-epimerase
BAB_RS20360 aroQ Type II 3-dehydroquinate dehydratase
BAB_RS21455 eno Phosphopyruvate hydratase
BAB_RS21525 gltA Citrate synthase
BAB_RS21755 - NADP-dependent isocitrate dehydrogenase
BAB_RS22655 serB Phosphoserine phosphatase SerB
BAB_RS23305 - Ribose-phosphate pyrophosphokinase
BAB_RS24225 tkt Transketolase
BAB_RS24230 gap Type I glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase
BAB_RS24635 - Chorismate mutase
BAB_RS24720 - Glutamate-5-semialdehyde dehydrogenase
BAB_RS24865 - Aspartate kinase
BAB_RS25140 dapF Diaminopimelate epimerase
BAB_RS26220 metK Methionine adenosyltransferase
BAB_RS28035 - Aspartate-semialdehyde dehydrogenase
BAB_RS31000 dapD 2%2C3%2C4%2C5-tetrahydropyridine-2%2C6-dicarboxylate N-succinyltransferase

Cofactor biosynthesis and metabolic enzyme functions

Cofactor biosynthesis was the most enriched functional category, reflecting its fundamental role in bacterial viability. Cofactors are essential structural components that bind inactive apoptoenzymes to form catalytically active holoenzymes, enabling critical physiological processes. These molecules directly regulate bacterial proliferation through modulating enzymatic activity, metabolic flux, and redox homeostasis (Sun et al. 2023). Cofactors can be functionally categorized into three distinct types based on their chemical structures and catalytic roles: catalysts, carriers, and substrates (Wang et al. 2019).

Dephospho-coenzyme A (CoA) kinase is an example of catalytic cofactor biosynthesis among the essential genes identified. Dephospho-CoA kinase enzyme catalyzes the ATP-dependent phosphorylation of dephospho-CoA to generate CoA, which represents the final step in CoA biosynthesis. This biosynthetic enzyme is indispensable for bacterial growth, given the extensive participation of CoA in diverse metabolic pathways, being highly conserved across prokaryotic and eukaryotic organisms (Shimosaka et al. 2019).

The essential gene library revealed numerous additional enzymes involved in cofactor metabolism and energy transduction, such as NAD+ kinase, NAD+ synthase, dihydropteroate synthase, 5-aminolevulinate synthase, nicotinate phosphoribosyltransferase, and serine hydroxymethyltransferase. These enzymes have various implications for bioengineering applications and antimicrobial target development. The overexpression of NAD+ synthase and nicotinate phosphoribosyltransferase in industrial strains in the bioengineering context enhances intracellular NAD(H) and NADP(H) concentrations, increasing the productivity of bacterial transformation systems (Jaroensuk et al. 2024). Dihydropteroate synthase is the primary molecular target of sulfonamide antibiotics. Dihydropteroate synthase catalyzes the condensation of p-aminobenzoic acid and dihydropteridine pyrophosphate to form dihydropteroate, the immediate precursor in tetrahydrofolate synthesis (Bermingham and Derrick 2002). Sulfonamides exert antimicrobial effects through competitively inhibiting dihydropteroate synthase, effectively disrupting folate biosynthesis in pathogenic bacteria (Duysak et al. 2023). However, the specific function of dihydropteroate synthase in B. abortus has not been validated.

Core cellular processes and carbon metabolism

Ribosomal biogenesis represents another major functional category that was enriched among the essential genes, reflecting the fundamental need to synthesize protein for bacterial viability. The identified essential proteins were exclusively involved in the assembly and maturation of 30S and 50S ribosomal subunits, underscoring the critical necessity of the translational machinery for cellular function.

Carbon metabolic pathways, including glycolysis, the tricarboxylic acid cycle, and the pentose phosphate pathway, provide the metabolic foundation required for bacterial energy production and biosynthetic precursor generation. The key enzymes identified in these interconnected pathways included transketolase from the pentose phosphate pathway; glucose-6-phosphate isomerase and triosephosphate isomerase from glycolysis; and citrate synthase, malate dehydrogenase, and NADP+-dependent isocitrate dehydrogenase from the tricarboxylic acid cycle. Additionally, essential genes involved in purine nucleotide biosynthesis, including ribose-phosphate pyrophosphokinase, and various enzymes involved in one-carbon metabolism were identified as critical for maintaining cellular nucleotide pools.

Amino acid biosynthesis and oxidative phosphorylation

The essential gene repertoire comprises numerous enzymes that are indispensable for amino acid biosynthesis, highlighting the need for de novo amino acid production under standard growth conditions. An example is chorismate mutase, a pivotal enzyme involved in aromatic amino acid biosynthesis that catalyzes the Claisen rearrangement of chorismate to prephenate, the immediate precursor of phenylalanine and tyrosine synthesis (van Neer et al. 2025). This enzyme participates in the shikimate pathway and is a potential target for the development of antibacterial inhibitors against pathogenic mycobacteria (Russ et al. 2020).

Most of the identified essential genes within the oxidative phosphorylation pathway encode the structural and catalytic subunits of the NADH dehydrogenase complex and ATP synthase. This reflects the fundamental need for aerobic energy production in Brucella species. These findings emphasize the critical dependence of B. abortus on oxidative metabolism for maintaining cellular energy homeostasis.

These five functional categories collectively encompassed most of the enrichment signals observed in the analysis. The representation of the other metabolic and biosynthetic pathways was substantially lower than that of the essential gene sets. This distribution pattern indicates that B. abortus essentiality is primarily driven by the core metabolic processes, protein synthesis machinery, and fundamental biosynthetic capabilities required for bacterial survival under laboratory culture conditions.

DISCUSSION

Tn-seq technology has been applied for screening virulence genes, growth factors, and drug resistance targets. We constructed a whole-genome mutant library for B. abortus strains A19 and S2308. The insertion site saturation exceeded 60% in both mutant libraries, indicating the high quality of the mutant library and the reliability of the subsequent results. The incubation time on the plates during library construction was strictly limited to 72 h to prevent sufficient growth of insertion mutants with growth defects at detrimental sites.

Although ribosomal protein genes are evolutionarily conserved, insertions were observed in rplQ, rpsH, rplT, and rplS within the B. abortus A19 library, which probably did not abolish normal function. Insertions were similarly observed in rpsA, rplS, and rplQ in the B. abortus S2308 library. A study on a B. melitensis NI mutant library also documented transposon insertions in the ribosomal protein genes rpsB and rpsI without affecting gene function, suggesting that certain ribosomal protein genes possess a degree of tolerance to transposon insertion (Cloeckaert et al. 2002; De et al. 2017).

Several of the potentially essential genes among those identified in the two libraries represented important drug targets, whereas others were associated with drug resistance or virulence in other pathogens. For example, dihydropteroate synthase is a key target for sulfonamide drugs (Venkatesan et al. 2023). MurC is a potential target for curcumin derivatives in Salmonella typhi (Debroy and Ramaiah 2022). FabF is a target for acyl sulfonamides in chlamydia (Mojica et al. 2017).

Several genes involved in lipopolysaccharide biosynthesis were identified in the two libraries. For instance, LptE in Pseudomonas aeruginosa promotes LptD maturation and stability (Lo Sciuto et al. 2018). LptE depletion not only reduces the virulence of P. aeruginosa but also causes severe membrane permeability defects, leading to a marked increase in susceptibility to Rifampin. Moreover, the susceptibility to Tetracycline and β-lactam antibiotics increased after LptE depletion (Shen et al. 2019). LptE is thus an essential gene in P. aeruginosa (Bolla et al. 2011). Lipopolysaccharide is a crucial antigen in Brucella that plays a key role in its pathogenicity. LptE may play a similar role in Brucella based on sequence homology analysis (Conde-Álvarez et al. 2013).

We constructed random mutant libraries of the B. abortus strains A19 and S2308. We used Tn-seq analysis to identify 451 and 393 putative essential genes required for survival on TSA plates in B. abortus strains A19 and S2308, respectively. Under different stress conditions or during host-pathogen interactions, the essentiality of certain genes may change, transitioning from non-essential to essential. These resources provide a foundation for further studying the essential genes governing Brucella survival in vitro and in vivo, as well as for developing novel vaccine candidates and drug targets against brucellosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial strains, culture conditions, and plasmids

B. abortus strains A19 and S2308 were obtained from cryogenic laboratory storage and maintained in tryptic soy broth (TSB) or tryptic soy agar (Difco, BD, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) at 37°C under orbital shaking at 180 r/min. Transformants were selected using kanamycin sulfate (50 μg/mL). Escherichia coli strains were cultivated in Luria-Bertani medium supplemented with strain-specific antibiotics. Auxotrophic strain WM3064 required additional supplementation with 2,6-diaminopimelic acid (50 μg/mL; Sigma-Aldrich). Kanamycin (25 μg/mL) was used for selection. All bacterial cultures were preserved at −80°C in culture medium containing 35% (v/v) glycerol.

Constructing B. abortus A19 and S2308 mutant library

Comprehensive transposon insertion libraries were separately constructed for B. abortus strains A19 and S2308 using the Mariner himar1C9 transposase system delivered via the suicide vector pSam_Cam. Conjugative transfer was performed using E. coli WM3064 as the donor organism.

The donor strain harboring pSam_Mariner was cultured for 8 h in Luria-Bertani medium supplemented with kanamycin (25 μg/mL) and 2,6-diaminopimelic acid (50 μg/mL). The recipient B. abortus strain (A19 or S2308) was independently cultured in TSB medium for 48 h at 37°C to construct each library. Both bacterial cultures were harvested via centrifugation and washed with TSB. The resulting cell suspensions were collected into separate 50 mL centrifuge tubes.

Donor E. coli cells were separately mixed for conjugative mating with recipient B. abortus A19 or S2308 cells in a 3:1 volume ratio in 1.5 mL microcentrifuge tubes and transferred onto TSA plates, which were overlaid with nitrocellulose membranes. The mating plates were incubated at 37°C for 12 h. The bacteria were washed from the nitrocellulose membranes following conjugation using TSB, adjusted to a final volume of 20 mL, and induced with isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside at a final concentration of 1 mmol/L from a 1 mol/L stock solution under shaking conditions (180 r/min, 37°C) for 3 h.

Postinduction cells were pelleted via centrifugation (5000 r/min, 5 min), resuspended in fresh TSB to terminate isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside activity, and plated onto TSA containing kanamycin sulfate (50 μg/mL) using sterile glass beads to ensure uniform distribution. The transposon-positive colonies from each strain after 72 h of incubation at 37°C were separately processed to preserve the libraries. All colonies were harvested into 50 mL centrifuge tubes using TSB. A 15-mL aliquot was heat-inactivated (90°C, 20 min) for each library for the subsequent genomic sequencing analysis (Jiang et al. 2025). The remaining cell suspension was mixed with an equal volume of sterile 50% (v/v) glycerol, aliquoted into 2 mL cryovials, and archived at −80°C for long-term storage (Fig. 5).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Schematic diagram of mutant library construction

Mutant library screening and characterization

The genomic DNA was extracted from the inactivated samples using a TIANamp Bacterial DNA Kit, and its quality was assessed. The DNA was randomly fragmented into 200–500 bp segments, which was followed by end repair and A-tailing. Adaptors were ligated to the repaired ends, and target fragments were enriched through primary PCR amplification using the transposon-specific primer R1 and adapter universal primer Tn-F. The amplified products were purified using 1X magnetic beads. Secondary PCR amplification was then performed using the P5 universal primer and the P7 index primer, followed by another 1X magnetic bead purification to obtain the final sequencing library. The quality of the resulting library was verified. The libraries were pooled after quality control according to the effective concentration and sequencing depth requirements for Illumina PE150 sequencing (Hangzhou Watson Biotechnologies). Sequence reads were filtered using the TPP tool within the TRANSIT software package based on primer-specific criteria to retain qualified sequences (Shen et al. 2016). The filtered reads were aligned against the reference genome sequence to map the precise insertion sites. The gene annotation files were converted to a TRANSIT-compatible format. Gene essentiality was determined using Gumbel analysis in TRANSIT, yielding separate essential gene calls based on the Gumbel (E) and binomial (EB) statistical models (DeJesus et al. 2015).

Putative essential gene enrichment analysis

After the transit Gumbel analysis, genes classified as “E” or “EB” were considered essential genes in the sample. KEGG enrichment analysis was performed on the identified essential genes using the clusterProfiler package (v4.14.6). The results from the enrichment analysis were visualized using the “dotplot” function.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by grants from the Key Program of the Natural Science Foundation of Gansu Province (23JRRA560), the Major Science and Technology Project of Gansu Province (22ZD6NA001), the Youth Innovation Program of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (Y2022QC27), the Innovation Program of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS-ASTIP-2021-LVRI) and the Key Project (CAAS-ASTIP-JBGS-20210701).

Acknowledgments

Conflict of interest

Siwei Guo, Weidong Bu, Fangfang Guo, Dianyu Li, Liyuan Liu, Xiaxia Liu, Yuefeng Chu and Jian Xu declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Contributor Information

Yuefeng Chu, Email: chuyuefeng@caas.cn.

Jian Xu, Email: jianxu@lzu.edu.cn.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Human and animal rights and informed consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

References

  1. Abdallah AI, Commander NJ, Woodward MJ, Spencer S, Hart CA, Winstanley C (2003) Type III secretion homologs are present in Brucella melitensis, B. ovis, and B. suis biovars 1, 2, and 3. Curr Microbiol 46(4): 241–245
  2. Alakavuklar MA, Fiebig A, Crosson S The Brucella cell envelope. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2023;77:233–253. doi: 10.1146/annurev-micro-032521-013159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Barquist L, Boinett CJ, Cain AK Approaches to querying bacterial genomes with transposon-insertion sequencing. RNA Biol. 2013;10(7):1161–1169. doi: 10.4161/rna.24765. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bermingham A, Derrick JP The folic acid biosynthesis pathway in bacteria: evaluation of potential for antibacterial drug discovery. BioEssays. 2002;24(7):637–648. doi: 10.1002/bies.10114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bolla J-M, Alibert-Franco S, Handzlik J, Chevalier J, Mahamoud A, Boyer G, Kieć-Kononowicz K, Pagès J-M Strategies for bypassing the membrane barrier in multidrug resistant Gram-negative bacteria. FEBS Lett. 2011;585(11):1682–1690. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2011.04.054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cain AK, Barquist L, Goodman AL, Paulsen IT, Parkhill J, van Opijnen T A decade of advances in transposon-insertion sequencing. Nat Rev Genet. 2020;21(9):526–540. doi: 10.1038/s41576-020-0244-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chao MC, Abel S, Davis BM, Waldor MK The design and analysis of transposon insertion sequencing experiments. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2016;14(2):119–128. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro.2015.7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cloeckaert A, Grayon M, Grépinet O (2002) Identification of Brucella melitensis vaccine strain Rev. 1 by PCR-RFLP based on a mutation in the rpsL gene. Vaccine 20(19–20): 2546–2550
  9. Conde-Álvarez R, Arce-Gorvel V, Gil-Ramírez Y, Iriarte M, Grilló M-J, Gorvel JP, Moriyón I Lipopolysaccharide as a target for brucellosis vaccine design. Microb Pathog. 2013;58:29–34. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2012.11.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Corbel MJ Brucellosis: an overview. Emerg Infect Dis. 1997;3(2):213–221. doi: 10.3201/eid0302.970219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Craig NL Target site selection in transposition. Annu Rev Biochem. 1997;66:437–474. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.66.1.437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. De Y, Dong C, Cao Y, Wang X, Yang X, Wang N, Zhang C, Wang Z, Lyu Y, Wu Q Genome-wide sequence transposon insertion sites and analyze the essential genes of Brucella melitensis. Microb Pathog. 2017;112:97–102. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2017.09.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Debroy R, Ramaiah S MurC ligase of multi-drug resistant Salmonella Typhi can be inhibited by novel Curcumin derivative: evidence from molecular docking and dynamics simulations. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2022;151:106279. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2022.106279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. DeJesus MA, Ambadipudi C, Baker R, Sassetti C, Ioerger TR TRANSIT-a software tool for Himar1 TnSeq analysis. PLoS Comput Biol. 2015;11(10):e1004401. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004401. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Ding S, Wu X, Li G, Han M, Zhuang Y, Xu T Efficient transposition of the piggyBac (PB) transposon in mammalian cells and mice. Cell. 2005;122(3):473–483. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.07.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Duysak T, Jeong J-H, Kim K, Kim J-S, Choy HE Analysis of random mutations in Salmonella Gallinarum dihydropteroate synthase conferring sulfonamide resistance. Arch Microbiol. 2023;205(12):363. doi: 10.1007/s00203-023-03696-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Friedrich MJ, Rad L, Bronner IF, Strong A, Wang W, Weber J, Mayho M, Ponstingl H, Engleitner T, Grove C, Pfaus A, Saur D, Cadiñanos J, Quail MA, Vassiliou GS, Liu P, Bradley A, Rad R Genome-wide transposon screening and quantitative insertion site sequencing for cancer gene discovery in mice. Nat Protoc. 2017;12(2):289–309. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2016.164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Gray AN, Koo B-M, Shiver AL, Peters JM, Osadnik H, Gross CA High-throughput bacterial functional genomics in the sequencing era. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2015;27:86–95. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2015.07.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Green B, Bouchier C, Fairhead C, Craig NL, Cormack BP Insertion site preference of Mu, Tn5, and Tn7 transposons. Mob DNA. 2012;3(1):3. doi: 10.1186/1759-8753-3-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Guo Y, Park JM, Cui B, Humes E, Gangadharan S, Hung S, FitzGerald PC, Hoe K-L, Grewal SIS, Craig NL, Levin HL Integration profiling of gene function with dense maps of transposon integration. Genetics. 2013;195(2):599–609. doi: 10.1534/genetics.113.152744. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Hasanjani Roushan MR, Ebrahimpour S Human brucellosis: an overview. Caspian J Intern Med. 2015;6(1):46–47. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-59533-2_1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Hayes F Transposon-based strategies for microbial functional genomics and proteomics. Annu Rev Genet. 2003;37:3–29. doi: 10.1146/annurev.genet.37.110801.142807. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Jaroensuk J, Sutthaphirom C, Phonbuppha J, Chinantuya W, Kesornpun C, Akeratchatapan N, Kittipanukul N, Phatinuwat K, Atichartpongkul S, Fuangthong M, Pongtharangkul T, Hollmann F, Chaiyen P A versatile in situ cofactor enhancing system for meeting cellular demands for engineered metabolic pathways. J Biol Chem. 2024;300(2):105598. doi: 10.1016/j.jbc.2023.105598. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Jiang S, Li H, Zhang L, Mu W, Zhang Y, Chen T, Wu J, Tang H, Zheng S, Liu Y, Wu Y, Luo X, Xie Y, Ren J Generic Diagramming Platform (GDP): a comprehensive database of high-quality biomedical graphics. Nucleic Acids Res. 2025;53(D1):D1670–D1676. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkae973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Kleckner N, Chan RK, Tye B-K, Botstein D Mutagenesis by insertion of a drug-resistance element carrying an inverted repetition. J Mol Biol. 1975;97(4):561–575. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(75)80059-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Lo Sciuto A, Martorana AM, Fernández-Piñar R, Mancone C, Polissi A, Imperi F Pseudomonas aeruginosa LptE is crucial for LptD assembly, cell envelope integrity, antibiotic resistance and virulence. Virulence. 2018;9(1):1718–1733. doi: 10.1080/21505594.2018.1537730. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Mojica SA, Salin O, Bastidas RJ, Sunduru N, Hedenstrom M, Andersson CD, Núñez-Otero C, Engström P, Valdivia RH, Elofsson M, Gylfe Å N-acylated derivatives of sulfamethoxazole block Chlamydia fatty acid synthesis and interact with FabF. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017;61(10):e00716-17. doi: 10.1128/aac.00716-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Morgan RD, Dwinell EA, Bhatia TK, Lang EM, Luyten YA The MmeI family: type II restriction-modification enzymes that employ single-strand modification for host protection. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37(15):5208–5221. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkp534. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Russ WP, Figliuzzi M, Stocker C, Barrat-Charlaix P, Socolich M, Kast P, Hilvert D, Monasson R, Cocco S, Weigt M, Ranganathan R An evolution-based model for designing chorismate mutase enzymes. Science. 2020;369(6502):440–445. doi: 10.1126/science.aba3304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Shen W, Le S, Li Y, Hu F SeqKit: a cross-platform and ultrafast toolkit for FASTA/Q file manipulation. PLoS One. 2016;11(10):e0163962. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0163962. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Shen X, Johnson NV, Kreamer NNK, Barnes SW, Walker JR, Woods AL, Six DA, Dean CR Defects in efflux (oprM), β-lactamase (ampC), and lipopolysaccharide transport (lptE) genes mediate antibiotic hypersusceptibility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain Z61. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2019;63(7):e00784-19. doi: 10.1128/aac.00784-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Shimosaka T, Makarova KS, Koonin EV, Atomi H Identification of dephospho-coenzyme A (dephospho-CoA) kinase in Thermococcus kodakarensis and elucidation of the entire CoA biosynthesis pathway in archaea. mBio. 2019;10(4):e01146-19. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01146-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Sun Y, Zhang T, Lu B, Li X, Jiang L Application of cofactors in the regulation of microbial metabolism: a state of the art review. Front Microbiol. 2023;14:1145784. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1145784. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. van Neer RHP, Dranchak PK, Aitha M, Liu L, Carlson EK, Jacobsen IE, Battaile K, Fang Y, Tao D, Rai G, Padia J, Lovell S, Suga H, Inglese J Active- and allosteric-site cyclic peptide inhibitors of secreted M. tuberculosis chorismate mutase. ACS Infect Dis. 2025;11(3):703–714. doi: 10.1021/acsinfecdis.4c00798. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. van Opijnen T, Bodi KL, Camilli A Tn-seq: high-throughput parallel sequencing for fitness and genetic interaction studies in microorganisms. Nat Methods. 2009;6(10):767–772. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1377. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. van Opijnen T, Camilli A Transposon insertion sequencing: a new tool for systems-level analysis of microorganisms. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2013;11(7):435–442. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro3033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Venkatesan M, Fruci M, Verellen LA, Skarina T, Mesa N, Flick R, Pham C, Mahadevan R, Stogios PJ, Savchenko A Molecular mechanism of plasmid-borne resistance to sulfonamide antibiotics. Nat Commun. 2023;14(1):4031. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-39778-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Wang D, Li D, Zhang G, Wang C, Wei G Disruption of por1 gene in Candida utilis improves co-production of S-adenosylmethionine and glutathione. J Biotechnol. 2019;290:16–23. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2018.12.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Xiao J, Sun S, Liu Z, Fan C, Zhu B, Zhang D (2023) Analysis of key genes for the survival of Pantoea agglomerans under nutritional stress. Int J Biol Macromol 253(Pt 5): 127059. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.127059
  40. Yang G, Billings G, Hubbard TP, Park JS, Yin Leung K, Liu Q, Davis BM, Zhang Y, Wang Q, Waldor MK Time-resolved transposon insertion sequencing reveals genome-wide fitness dynamics during infection. mBio. 2017;8(5):e01581-17. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01581-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biophysics Reports are provided here courtesy of Biophysical Society of China

RESOURCES