Skip to main content
PMC home page
Gut logoLink to Gut
. 1993 Mar;34(3):348–350. doi: 10.1136/gut.34.3.348

Endoscopic injection therapy to prevent rebleeding from peptic ulcers with a protruding vessel: a controlled comparative trial.

P Rutgeerts 1, A M Gevers 1, M Hiele 1, L Broeckaert 1, G Vantrappen 1
PMCID: PMC1374139  PMID: 8472981

Abstract

Seventy five patients with severely bleeding peptic ulcer were included in a controlled comparative trial to assess the efficacy and safety of endoscopic injection therapy in preventing rebleeding from peptic ulcers that presented at endoscopy with a protruding vessel. Twenty five patients were treated with injection of epinephrine followed by polidocanol, 25 were treated with injection of absolute alcohol, and 25 with sham injection. Rebleeding occurred in 44% of patients in the sham group, 40% of those treated with epinephrine and polidocanol, and in 20% of those treated with absolute ethanol. The difference in the haemostasis rate between the control and ethanol treated subjects nearly reached significance (p = 0.07). A second therapy session resulted in haemostasis rates of 68% in the epinephrine-polidocanol group and of 88% in the absolute ethanol group. These rates after two treatments as well as the emergency surgery rates (32% in the epinephrine-polidocanol group and 8% in the absolute ethanol group; p = 0.07) were not significantly different. In eight of the 11 patients with rebleeding in the sham treatment group, definitive haemostasis was achieved by elective injection therapy. Overall transfusion requirements were mean (SD) 6.0 (0.7) units in the sham group, 6.0 (0.9) in the epinephrine-polidocanol group, and 3.9 (0.5) in the absolute ethanol group. Only the difference between ethanol and sham was significant (p = 0.02). This study shows that injection with absolute ethanol reduces rebleeding in these patients and significantly lowers transfusion requirements. Absolute ethanol was superior to epinephrine-polidocanol, which was not significantly better than sham therapy.

Full text

PDF
348

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Balanzó J., Sainz S., Such J., Espinós J. C., Guarner C., Cussó X., Monés J., Vilardell F. Endoscopic hemostasis by local injection of epinephrine and polidocanol in bleeding ulcer. A prospective randomized trial. Endoscopy. 1988 Nov;20(6):289–291. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1013023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Balanzó J., Villanueva C., Sainz S., Espinós J. C., Mendez C., Guarner C., Vilardell F. Injection therapy of bleeding peptic ulcer. A prospective, randomized trial using epinephrine and thrombin. Endoscopy. 1990 Jul;22(4):157–159. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1012828. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chester J. F., Hurley P. R. Gastric necrosis: a complication of endoscopic sclerosis for bleeding peptic ulcer. Endoscopy. 1990 Nov;22(6):287–287. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1012873. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chung S. C., Leung J. W., Steele R. J., Crofts T. J., Li A. K. Endoscopic injection of adrenaline for actively bleeding ulcers: a randomised trial. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1988 Jun 11;296(6637):1631–1633. doi: 10.1136/bmj.296.6637.1631. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chung S. C., Leung J. W., Sung J. Y., Lo K. K., Li A. K. Injection or heat probe for bleeding ulcer. Gastroenterology. 1991 Jan;100(1):33–37. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(91)90579-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Laine L. Multipolar electrocoagulation versus injection therapy in the treatment of bleeding peptic ulcers. A prospective, randomized trial. Gastroenterology. 1990 Nov;99(5):1303–1306. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(90)91154-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Levy J., Khakoo S., Barton R., Vicary R. Fatal injection sclerotherapy of a bleeding peptic ulcer. Lancet. 1991 Feb 23;337(8739):504–504. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(91)93452-f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Lin H. J., Lee F. Y., Kang W. M., Tsai Y. T., Lee S. D., Lee C. H. Heat probe thermocoagulation and pure alcohol injection in massive peptic ulcer haemorrhage: a prospective, randomised controlled trial. Gut. 1990 Jul;31(7):753–757. doi: 10.1136/gut.31.7.753. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Loizou L. A., Bown S. G. Endoscopic treatment for bleeding peptic ulcers: randomised comparison of adrenaline injection and adrenaline injection + Nd:YAG laser photocoagulation. Gut. 1991 Oct;32(10):1100–1103. doi: 10.1136/gut.32.10.1100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Loperfido S., Patelli G., La Torre L. Extensive necrosis of gastric mucosa following injection therapy of bleeding peptic ulcer. Endoscopy. 1990 Nov;22(6):285–286. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1010728. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Oxner R. B., Simmonds N. J., Gertner D. J., Nightingale J. M., Burnham W. R. Controlled trial of endoscopic injection treatment for bleeding from peptic ulcers with visible vessels. Lancet. 1992 Apr 18;339(8799):966–968. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(92)91537-i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Panés J., Viver J., Forné M., Garcia-Olivares E., Marco C., Garau J. Controlled trial of endoscopic sclerosis in bleeding peptic ulcers. Lancet. 1987 Dec 5;2(8571):1292–1294. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(87)91191-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Pascu O., Dräghici A., Acalovchi I. The effect of endoscopic hemostasis with alcohol on the mortality rate of nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage. A randomized prospective study. Endoscopy. 1989 Mar;21(2):53–55. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1012899. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Rajgopal C., Palmer K. R. Endoscopic injection sclerosis: effective treatment for bleeding peptic ulcer. Gut. 1991 Jul;32(7):727–729. doi: 10.1136/gut.32.7.727. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Rutgeerts P., Vantrappen G., Broeckaert L., Coremans G., Janssens J., Hiele M. Comparison of endoscopic polidocanol injection and YAG laser therapy for bleeding peptic ulcers. Lancet. 1989 May 27;1(8648):1164–1167. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(89)92751-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Schiller K. F., Truelove S. C., Williams D. G. Haematemesis and melaena, with special reference to factors influencing the outcome. Br Med J. 1970 Apr 4;2(5700):7–14. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.5700.7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Silverstein F. E., Gilbert D. A., Tedesco F. J., Buenger N. K., Persing J. The national ASGE survey on upper gastrointestinal bleeding. II. Clinical prognostic factors. Gastrointest Endosc. 1981 May;27(2):80–93. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(81)73156-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Storey D. W., Bown S. G., Swain C. P., Salmon P. R., Kirkham J. S., Northfield T. C. Endoscopic prediction of recurrent bleeding in peptic ulcers. N Engl J Med. 1981 Oct 15;305(16):915–916. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198110153051603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Swain C. P., Storey D. W., Bown S. G., Heath J., Mills T. N., Salmon P. R., Northfield T. C., Kirkham J. S., O'Sullivan J. P. Nature of the bleeding vessel in recurrently bleeding gastric ulcers. Gastroenterology. 1986 Mar;90(3):595–608. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(86)91113-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Young M. J., Bresnitz E. A., Strom B. L. Sample size nomograms for interpreting negative clinical studies. Ann Intern Med. 1983 Aug;99(2):248–251. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-99-2-248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Gut are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES