Skip to main content
Journal of Medical Ethics logoLink to Journal of Medical Ethics
. 1988 Sep;14(3):118–124. doi: 10.1136/jme.14.3.118

Health and disease: what can medicine do for philosophy?

J G Scadding 1
PMCID: PMC1375731  PMID: 3184130

Abstract

Philosophical discussions about health and disease often refer to a 'medical model' of bodily disease, in which diseases are regarded as causes of illness; diagnosis consists in identifying the disease affecting the patient, and this determines the appropriate treatment. This view is plausible only for diseases whose cause is known, though even in such instances the disease is the effect on the affected person, and must not be confused with its own cause. But in fact the medical diagnostic process which progresses from recognition of patterns of symptoms and signs, through search for abnormalities of structure and/or function, towards knowledge of causation often stops short of this desirable end-point; and at whatever point it comes to a halt, its result is expressed in terms of 'diseases'. Thus in medical discourse the names of diseases are a convenient device by which the current conclusion of the diagnostic process can be stated briefly; and they have widely varying factual implications. This nominalist analysis of the medical usages of the names of diseases has consequences for definitions of health and disease, and for some problems in medical ethics.

Full text

PDF
120

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Campbell E. J., Scadding J. G., Roberts R. S. The concept of disease. Br Med J. 1979 Sep 29;2(6193):757–762. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.6193.757. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Hare R. M. Health. J Med Ethics. 1986 Dec;12(4):174–181. doi: 10.1136/jme.12.4.174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. SCADDING J. G. MEANING OF DIAGNOSTIC TERMS IN BRONCHO-PULMONARY DISEASE. Br Med J. 1963 Dec 7;2(5370):1425–1430. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.5370.1425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. SCADDING J. G. Principles of definition in medicine with special reference to chronic bronchitis and emphysema. Lancet. 1959 Feb 14;1(7068):323–325. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(59)90308-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Scadding J. G. Diagnosis: the clinician and the computer. Lancet. 1967 Oct 21;2(7521):877–882. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(67)92608-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Scadding J. G. Nomenclature of mycobacterial disease. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1987 Nov;136(5):1308–1309. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/136.5.1308a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Scadding J. G. The concepts of disease: a response. Psychol Med. 1980 Aug;10(3):425–427. doi: 10.1017/s0033291700047309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Scadding J. G. The semantics of medical diagnosis. Int J Biomed Comput. 1972 Apr;3(2):83–90. doi: 10.1016/0020-7101(72)90039-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. de Dombal F. T., Leaper D. J., Staniland J. R., McCann A. P., Horrocks J. C. Computer-aided diagnosis of acute abdominal pain. Br Med J. 1972 Apr 1;2(5804):9–13. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.5804.9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Medical Ethics are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES