Abstract
The ethical problem of how to apportion limited resources amongst the needy has been forced on us by arbitrary limitation of health expenditure. Its solution would not be required if health expenditure were higher. Distribution of resources according to best value for money, assessed as Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) per unit cost, has been suggested as a possible solution, but leads to absurd anomalies. In the calculation of QALYs the implied value of life is no more than the absence of suffering. The use of QALYs for the comparison of treatments that are symptomatic or life-saving therefore leads to serious undervaluation of life and treatments that prolong it. Moreover, distribution of resources by best value for money, however assessed, is inequitable since for a given degree of suffering those whose illnesses happen to be cheaper to treat will be treated in preference to those whose treatments are more expensive.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Harris J. QALYfying the value of life. J Med Ethics. 1987 Sep;13(3):117–123. doi: 10.1136/jme.13.3.117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Maynard A. Logic in medicine: an economic perspective. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1987 Dec 12;295(6612):1537–1541. doi: 10.1136/bmj.295.6612.1537. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rosser R., Kind P. A scale of valuations of states of illness: is there a social consensus? Int J Epidemiol. 1978 Dec;7(4):347–358. doi: 10.1093/ije/7.4.347. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Smith A. Qualms about QALYs. Lancet. 1987 May 16;1(8542):1134–1136. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(87)91685-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Williams A. Economics of coronary artery bypass grafting. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1985 Aug 3;291(6491):326–329. doi: 10.1136/bmj.291.6491.326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]