Abstract
Infertility affects 15 per cent of the world's couples. Research at Edinburgh University has been directed at transplanting fetal ovarian tissue into infertile women, thus enabling them to bear children. Fetal ovary transplantation (FOT) has generated substantial controversy; in fact, one ethicist deemed the procedure 'so grotesque as to be unbelievable' (1). Some have suggested that fetal eggs may harbour unknown chromosomal abnormalities: however, there is no evidence that these eggs possess a higher incidence of genetic anomaly than ova found in a healthy adult female. There is also concern that fetal egg children will be psychologically harmed by the knowledge of their special conceptual status. It will be demonstrated that special conceptual status in and of itself does not determine developmental success. Rather, psychological well-being is dependent upon how the family and child cope with the unique challenges inherent in FOT. Lastly, though considering FOT a legitimate method of family building, given the global population crisis the wisdom of procreational rights will be challenged. Inherent to this challenge is a re-evaluation of the treatment of infertility as a significant disease necessitating remedy.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Carr D. H. Chromosome studies in selected spontaneous abortions. 1. Conception after oral contraceptives. Can Med Assoc J. 1970 Aug 15;103(4):343–348. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cha K. Y., Koo J. J., Ko J. J., Choi D. H., Han S. Y., Yoon T. K. Pregnancy after in vitro fertilization of human follicular oocytes collected from nonstimulated cycles, their culture in vitro and their transfer in a donor oocyte program. Fertil Steril. 1991 Jan;55(1):109–113. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)54068-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hook E. B., Cross P. K., Schreinemachers D. M. Chromosomal abnormality rates at amniocentesis and in live-born infants. JAMA. 1983 Apr 15;249(15):2034–2038. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hook E. B. Rates of chromosome abnormalities at different maternal ages. Obstet Gynecol. 1981 Sep;58(3):282–285. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mushin D. N., Barreda-Hanson M. C., Spensley J. C. In vitro fertilization children: early psychosocial development. J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transf. 1986 Aug;3(4):247–252. doi: 10.1007/BF01132812. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Oshimura M., Barrett J. C. Chemically induced aneuploidy in mammalian cells: mechanisms and biological significance in cancer. Environ Mutagen. 1986;8(1):129–159. doi: 10.1002/em.2860080112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Parry J. M., Sors A. The detection and assessment of the aneugenic potential of environmental chemicals: the European Community Aneuploidy Project. Mutat Res. 1993 May;287(1):3–15. doi: 10.1016/0027-5107(93)90140-b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Robertson John A. Embryos, families, and procreative liberty: the legal structure of the new reproduction. South Calif Law Rev. 1986 Jul;59(5):939–1041. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Robertson John A. Procreative liberty and the control of conception, pregnancy, and childbirth. Va Law Rev. 1983 Apr;69(3):405–464. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sbrana I., Di Sibio A., Lomi A., Scarcelli V. C-mitosis and numerical chromosome aberration analyses in human lymphocytes: 10 known or suspected spindle poisons. Mutat Res. 1993 May;287(1):57–70. doi: 10.1016/0027-5107(93)90145-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Uchida I. A., Holunga R., Lawler C. Maternal radiation and chromosomal aberrations. Lancet. 1968 Nov 16;2(7577):1045–1049. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(68)91525-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Watanabe T., Endo A. Chromosome analysis of preimplantation embryos after cadmium treatment of oocytes at meiosis I. Environ Mutagen. 1982;4(5):563–567. doi: 10.1002/em.2860040507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]