Skip to main content
PMC home page
American Journal of Human Genetics logoLink to American Journal of Human Genetics
. 1998 Apr;62(4):962–968. doi: 10.1086/301783

The quantitative LOD score: test statistic and sample size for exclusion and linkage of quantitative traits in human sibships.

G P Page 1, C I Amos 1, E Boerwinkle 1
PMCID: PMC1377023  PMID: 9529341

Abstract

We present a test statistic, the quantitative LOD (QLOD) score, for the testing of both linkage and exclusion of quantitative-trait loci in randomly selected human sibships. As with the traditional LOD score, the boundary values of 3, for linkage, and -2, for exclusion, can be used for the QLOD score. We investigated the sample sizes required for inferring exclusion and linkage, for various combinations of linked genetic variance, total heritability, recombination distance, and sibship size, using fixed-size sampling. The sample sizes required for both linkage and exclusion were not qualitatively different and depended on the percentage of variance being linked or excluded and on the total genetic variance. Information regarding linkage and exclusion in sibships larger than size 2 increased as approximately all possible pairs n(n-1)/2 up to sibships of size 6. Increasing the recombination (theta) distance between the marker and the trait loci reduced empirically the power for both linkage and exclusion, as a function of approximately (1-2theta)4.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (282.4 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Amos C. I. Robust variance-components approach for assessing genetic linkage in pedigrees. Am J Hum Genet. 1994 Mar;54(3):535–543. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Amos C. I., Zhu D. K., Boerwinkle E. Assessing genetic linkage and association with robust components of variance approaches. Ann Hum Genet. 1996 Mar;60(Pt 2):143–160. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-1809.1996.tb01184.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Blackwelder W. C., Elston R. C. A comparison of sib-pair linkage tests for disease susceptibility loci. Genet Epidemiol. 1985;2(1):85–97. doi: 10.1002/gepi.1370020109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Blanton S. H., Sarfarazi M., Eiberg H., de Groote J., Farndon P. A., Kilpatrick M. W., Child A. H., Pope F. M., Peltonen L., Francomano C. A. An exclusion map of Marfan syndrome. J Med Genet. 1990 Feb;27(2):73–77. doi: 10.1136/jmg.27.2.73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chotai J. On the lod score method in linkage analysis. Ann Hum Genet. 1984 Oct;48(Pt 4):359–378. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-1809.1984.tb00849.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Collins F. S. Positional cloning moves from perditional to traditional. Nat Genet. 1995 Apr;9(4):347–350. doi: 10.1038/ng0495-347. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Goldgar D. E. Multipoint analysis of human quantitative genetic variation. Am J Hum Genet. 1990 Dec;47(6):957–967. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hodge S. E. The information contained in multiple sibling pairs. Genet Epidemiol. 1984;1(2):109–122. doi: 10.1002/gepi.1370010203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kruglyak L., Lander E. S. A nonparametric approach for mapping quantitative trait loci. Genetics. 1995 Mar;139(3):1421–1428. doi: 10.1093/genetics/139.3.1421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Lander E., Kruglyak L. Genetic dissection of complex traits: guidelines for interpreting and reporting linkage results. Nat Genet. 1995 Nov;11(3):241–247. doi: 10.1038/ng1195-241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Li Z., Rao D. C. Random effects model for meta-analysis of multiple quantitative sibpair linkage studies. Genet Epidemiol. 1996;13(4):377–383. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2272(1996)13:4<377::AID-GEPI6>3.0.CO;2-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. MORTON N. E. Sequential tests for the detection of linkage. Am J Hum Genet. 1955 Sep;7(3):277–318. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Risch N., Zhang H. Extreme discordant sib pairs for mapping quantitative trait loci in humans. Science. 1995 Jun 16;268(5217):1584–1589. doi: 10.1126/science.7777857. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Schork N. J. Extended multipoint identity-by-descent analysis of human quantitative traits: efficiency, power, and modeling considerations. Am J Hum Genet. 1993 Dec;53(6):1306–1319. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Smith C. A. A non-parametric test for linkage with a quantitative character. Ann Hum Genet. 1975 May;38(4):451–460. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-1809.1975.tb00634.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Suarez B. K., Hodge S. E. A simple method to detect linkage for rare recessive diseases: an application to juvenile diabetes. Clin Genet. 1979 Feb;15(2):126–136. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.1979.tb01751.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Wijsman E. M., Amos C. I. Genetic analysis of simulated oligogenic traits in nuclear and extended pedigrees: summary of GAW10 contributions. Genet Epidemiol. 1997;14(6):719–735. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2272(1997)14:6<719::AID-GEPI28>3.0.CO;2-S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from American Journal of Human Genetics are provided here courtesy of American Society of Human Genetics

RESOURCES