Abstract
Requests by patients or their families for treatment which the patient's physician considers to be "inappropriate" are becoming more frequent than refusals of treatment which the physician considers appropriate. Such requests are often based on the patient's religious beliefs about the attributes of God (sovereignty, omnipotence), the attributes of persons (sanctity of life), or the individual's personal relationship with God (communication, commands, etc). We present four such cases and discuss some of the basic religious tenets of the three Abrahamic faith traditions as they relate to such requests. We suggest that religious reasons for requesting "inappropriate" treatment are "special" and deserve serious consideration. We offer guidance to assist clinicians and clinical ethicists as they attempt to resolve these conflicts, emphasising the importance of understanding the religious beliefs of the patient/surrogate and suggesting the assistance of a religious interpreter. We suggest open discussion with patients and families of both the clinical situation and the theological basis for these requests. We also suggest that clinicians use additional religious doctrines or principles from patients' own traditions to balance the reasons behind the requests. We conclude that most persistent requests for "inappropriate" treatment should be honoured.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Annas G. J. Asking the courts to set the standard of emergency care--the case of Baby K. N Engl J Med. 1994 May 26;330(21):1542–1545. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199405263302120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Blackhall L. J. Must we always use CPR? N Engl J Med. 1987 Nov 12;317(20):1281–1285. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198711123172009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McCormick R. A. Theology and bioethics. Hastings Cent Rep. 1989 Mar-Apr;19(2):5–10. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Miles S. H. Informed demand for "non-beneficial" medical treatment. N Engl J Med. 1991 Aug 15;325(7):512–515. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199108153250713. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Miles S. H. Informed demand for "non-beneficial" medical treatment. N Engl J Med. 1991 Aug 15;325(7):512–515. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199108153250713. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Moore F. D. The desperate case: CARE (costs, applicability, research, ethics) JAMA. 1989 Mar 10;261(10):1483–1484. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Olick R. S. Brain death, religious freedom, and public policy: New Jersey's landmark legislative initiative. Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 1991 Dec;1(4):275–292. doi: 10.1353/ken.0.0068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Orr R. D., Marshall P. A., Osborn J. Cross-cultural considerations in clinical ethics consultations. Arch Fam Med. 1995 Feb;4(2):159–164. doi: 10.1001/archfami.4.2.159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Paris J. J., Crone R. K., Reardon F. Physicians' refusal of requested treatment. The case of Baby L. N Engl J Med. 1990 Apr 5;322(14):1012–1015. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199004053221420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Paris J. J., Schreiber M. D., Statter M., Arensman R., Siegler M. Beyond autonomy--physicians' refusal to use life-prolonging extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. N Engl J Med. 1993 Jul 29;329(5):354–357. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199307293290512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schneiderman L. J., Jecker N. S., Jonsen A. R. Medical futility: its meaning and ethical implications. Ann Intern Med. 1990 Jun 15;112(12):949–954. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-112-12-949. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stauch M. Rationality and the refusal of medical treatment: a critique of the recent approach of the English courts. J Med Ethics. 1995 Jun;21(3):162–165. doi: 10.1136/jme.21.3.162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wreen M. J. Autonomy, religious values, and refusal of lifesaving medical treatment. J Med Ethics. 1991 Sep;17(3):124–130. doi: 10.1136/jme.17.3.124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]