Skip to main content
PMC home page
American Journal of Public Health logoLink to American Journal of Public Health
. 1996 Jun;86(6):825–831. doi: 10.2105/ajph.86.6.825

The risk of prematurity and small-for-gestational-age birth in Mexico City: the effects of working conditions and antenatal leave.

P Cerón-Mireles 1, S D Harlow 1, C I Sánchez-Carrillo 1
PMCID: PMC1380402  PMID: 8659657

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study examined the effect of working conditions, occupational stress, and antenatal leave on risk of small-for-gestational age and premature births in Mexico City. METHODS: Over a 3-month period, 2663 (96.2%) of 2767 women who gave birth at three major hospitals and worked at least 3 months during pregnancy were interviewed shortly after delivery. After the exclusion of multiple gestations and birth defects, 261 (10.0%) small-for-gestational-age and 288 (11.0%) preterm births were identified. RESULTS: For small-for-gestational-age births, working more than 50 hours a week (odds ratio [OR] = 1.59), standing more than 7 hours a day (OR = 1.40), and no antenatal leave (OR = 1.55) were associated with an increased risk. Women with no antenatal leave were also much more likely to give birth prematurely (OR = 3.04). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, arduous working conditions and lack of antenatal leave benefits were found to increase the risk of poor birth outcome in Mexican women. Enforcement of existing antenatal leave laws and provision of comparable benefits for the uninsured may reduce the incidence of small-for-gestational-age births and prematurity.

Full text

PDF
831

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Alegre A., Rodriguez-Escudero F. J., Cruz E., Prada M. Influence of work during pregnancy on fetal weight. J Reprod Med. 1984 May;29(5):334–336. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Barnes D. L., Adair L. S., Popkin B. M. Women's physical activity and pregnancy outcome: a longitudinal analysis from the Philippines. Int J Epidemiol. 1991 Mar;20(1):162–172. doi: 10.1093/ije/20.1.162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Brandt L. P., Nielsen C. V. Job stress and adverse outcome of pregnancy: a causal link or recall bias? Am J Epidemiol. 1992 Feb 1;135(3):302–311. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Briend A. Maternal work during pregnancy in traditional societies. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1980 Jul 1;137(5):630–631. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(80)90708-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hall E. M. Gender, work control, and stress: a theoretical discussion and an empirical test. Int J Health Serv. 1989;19(4):725–745. doi: 10.2190/5MYW-PGP9-4M72-TPXF. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Homer C. J., James S. A., Siegel E. Work-related psychosocial stress and risk of preterm, low birthweight delivery. Am J Public Health. 1990 Feb;80(2):173–177. doi: 10.2105/ajph.80.2.173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kramer M. S. Determinants of low birth weight: methodological assessment and meta-analysis. Bull World Health Organ. 1987;65(5):663–737. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Luke B., Mamelle N., Keith L., Munoz F., Minogue J., Papiernik E., Johnson T. R. The association between occupational factors and preterm birth: a United States nurses' study. Research Committee of the Association of Women's Health, Obstetric, and Neonatal Nurses. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995 Sep;173(3 Pt 1):849–862. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(95)90354-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. López-Muñoz F., Boya J. El papel de la glándula pineal en la doctrina psicofisiológica cartesiana. Acta Physiol Pharmacol Ther Latinoam. 1992;42(4):205–216. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Mamelle N., Bertucat I., Munoz F. Pregnant women at work: rest periods to prevent preterm birth? Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 1989 Jan;3(1):19–28. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.1989.tb00366.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Mamelle N., Laumon B., Lazar P. Prematurity and occupational activity during pregnancy. Am J Epidemiol. 1984 Mar;119(3):309–322. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113750. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Murphy J. F., Dauncey M., Newcombe R., Garcia J., Elbourne D. Employment in pregnancy: prevalence, maternal characteristics, perinatal outcome. Lancet. 1984 May 26;1(8387):1163–1166. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(84)91404-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Rabkin C. S., Anderson H. R., Bland J. M., Brooke O. G., Chamberlain G., Peacock J. L. Maternal activity and birth weight: a prospective, population-based study. Am J Epidemiol. 1990 Mar;131(3):522–531. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115527. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Saurel-Cubizolles M. J., Kaminski M., Llado-Arkhipoff J., Du Mazaubrun C., Estryn-Behar M., Berthier C., Mouchet M., Kelfa C. Pregnancy and its outcome among hospital personnel according to occupation and working conditions. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1985 Jun;39(2):129–134. doi: 10.1136/jech.39.2.129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Saurel-Cubizolles M. J., Kaminski M. Pregnant women's working conditions and their changes during pregnancy: a national study in France. Br J Ind Med. 1987 Apr;44(4):236–243. doi: 10.1136/oem.44.4.236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Saurel-Cubizolles M. J., Kaminski M. Work in pregnancy: its evolving relationship with perinatal outcome (a review). Soc Sci Med. 1986;22(4):431–442. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(86)90048-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Stengel B., Saurel-Cubizolles M. J., Kaminski M. Healthy worker effect and pregnancy: role of adverse obstetric history and social characteristics. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1987 Dec;41(4):312–320. doi: 10.1136/jech.41.4.312. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Tafari N., Naeye R. L., Gobezie A. Effects of maternal undernutrition and heavy physical work during pregnancy on birth weight. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1980 Mar;87(3):222–226. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1980.tb04523.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Teitelman A. M., Welch L. S., Hellenbrand K. G., Bracken M. B. Effect of maternal work activity on preterm birth and low birth weight. Am J Epidemiol. 1990 Jan;131(1):104–113. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115463. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Villar J., Farnot U., Barros F., Victora C., Langer A., Belizan J. M. A randomized trial of psychosocial support during high-risk pregnancies. The Latin American Network for Perinatal and Reproductive Research. N Engl J Med. 1992 Oct 29;327(18):1266–1271. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199210293271803. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from American Journal of Public Health are provided here courtesy of American Public Health Association

RESOURCES