Skip to main content
American Journal of Public Health logoLink to American Journal of Public Health
. 1997 Jul;87(7):1107–1112. doi: 10.2105/ajph.87.7.1107

National health care reform and the 103rd Congress: the activities and influence of public health advocates.

H Schauffler 1, J Wilkerson 1
PMCID: PMC1380882  PMID: 9240098

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study examined the activities and influence of public health interest groups and coalitions on the national health care reform debates in the 103rd Congress. METHODS: Congressional staff and representatives of public health interest groups, coalitions, and government health agencies were interviewed. Content analysis of eight leading national health care reform bills was performed. RESULTS: The public health community coalesced around public health in health care reform; nearly all the major interest groups and government health agencies joined two or more public health or prevention coalitions, and half joined three or more. The most effective influence on health care reform legislation was early, sustained personal contact with Congress members and their staffs, accompanied by succinct written materials summarizing key points. Media campaigns and grassroots mobilization were less effective. Seven of the eight leading health care reform bills included one or more of the priorities supported by public health advocates. CONCLUSIONS: The public health community played an important role in increasing awareness and support for public health programs in the health care reform bills of the 103rd Congress.

Full text

PDF
1109

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Baker E. L., Melton R. J., Stange P. V., Fields M. L., Koplan J. P., Guerra F. A., Satcher D. Health reform and the health of the public. Forging community health partnerships. JAMA. 1994 Oct 26;272(16):1276–1282. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Baumgartner F. R., Talbert J. C. From setting a national agenda on health care to making decisions in Congress. J Health Polit Policy Law. 1995 Summer;20(2):437–445. doi: 10.1215/03616878-20-2-437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Brady D. W., Buckley K. M. Health care reform in the 103d Congress: a predictable failure. J Health Polit Policy Law. 1995 Summer;20(2):447–454. doi: 10.1215/03616878-20-2-447. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Dorfman L., Schauffler H. H., Wilkerson J., Feinson J. Local television news coverage of President Clinton's introduction of the Health Security Act. JAMA. 1996 Apr 17;275(15):1201–1205. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Lasker R. D., Lee P. R. Improving health through health system reform. JAMA. 1994 Oct 26;272(16):1297–1298. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Schauffler H. H. Analysis of prevention benefits in comprehensive health care reform legislation in the 102nd Congress. Am J Prev Med. 1994 Jan-Feb;10(1):45–51. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Schauffler H. H. Disease prevention policy under Medicare: a historical and political analysis. Am J Prev Med. 1993 Mar-Apr;9(2):71–77. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Skocpol T. The rise and resounding demise of the Clinton plan. Health Aff (Millwood) 1995 Spring;14(1):66–85. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.14.1.66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from American Journal of Public Health are provided here courtesy of American Public Health Association

RESOURCES