Skip to main content
PMC home page
American Journal of Public Health logoLink to American Journal of Public Health
. 1997 Dec;87(12):1989–1996. doi: 10.2105/ajph.87.12.1989

The defeat of Philip Morris' 'California Uniform Tobacco Control Act'.

H Macdonald 1, S Aguinaga 1, S A Glantz 1
PMCID: PMC1381242  PMID: 9431289

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This paper describes the strategies used by Philip Morris and other tobacco companies to promote a California initiative (Proposition 188) preempting local control of tobacco and those used by public health groups to defeat the initiative. METHODS: Interviews with key informants were conducted, and the written record was reviewed. RESULTS: Tobacco companies nearly succeeded in passing Proposition 188 by presenting it as a pro-health measure that would prevent children from obtaining cigarettes and provide protection against secondhand smoke. Public health groups defeated it by highlighting tobacco industry backing. A private charitable foundation also played an innovative role by financing a non-partisan public education campaign. CONCLUSIONS: Public health forces must be alert to sophisticated efforts by the tobacco industry to enact preemptive state legislation by making it look like tobacco control legislation. The coalition structure that emerged in the "No on 188" campaign represents an effective model for future tobacco control activities. The new role of charitable foundations defined in the Proposition 188 campaign can be used in other public health issues.

Full text

PDF
1994

Images in this article

1992FIGURE 1
on p.1992

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bal D. G., Kizer K. W., Felten P. G., Mozar H. N., Niemeyer D. Reducing tobacco consumption in California. Development of a statewide anti-tobacco use campaign. JAMA. 1990 Sep 26;264(12):1570–1574. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Begay M. E., Traynor M., Glantz S. A. The tobacco industry, state politics, and tobacco education in California. Am J Public Health. 1993 Sep;83(9):1214–1221. doi: 10.2105/ajph.83.9.1214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Califano J. A., Jr Revealing the link between campaign financing and deaths caused by tobacco. JAMA. 1994 Oct 19;272(15):1217–1218. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cardador M. T., Hazan A. R., Glantz S. A. Tobacco industry smokers' rights publications: a content analysis. Am J Public Health. 1995 Sep;85(9):1212–1217. doi: 10.2105/ajph.85.9.1212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Conlisk E., Siegel M., Lengerich E., Mac Kenzie W., Malek S., Eriksen M. The status of local smoking regulations in North Carolina following a state preemption bill. JAMA. 1995 Mar 8;273(10):805–807. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Crawford V. L. Cancer converts tobacco lobbyist: Victor L. Crawford goes on the record. Interview by Andrew A. Skolnick. JAMA. 1995 Jul 19;274(3):199-200, 202. doi: 10.1001/jama.274.3.199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Forster J. L., Hourigan M. E., Kelder S. Locking devices on cigarette vending machines: evaluation of a city ordinance. Am J Public Health. 1992 Sep;82(9):1217–1219. doi: 10.2105/ajph.82.9.1217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Glantz S. A. Achieving a smokefree society. Circulation. 1987 Oct;76(4):746–752. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.76.4.746. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Glantz S. A., Begay M. E. Tobacco industry campaign contributions are affecting tobacco control policymaking in California. JAMA. 1994 Oct 19;272(15):1176–1182. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Glantz S. A. The ledger of tobacco control. JAMA. 1996 Sep 18;276(11):871–873. doi: 10.1001/jama.276.11.871. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hanauer P. Proposition P: anatomy of a nonsmokers' rights ordinance. N Y State J Med. 1985 Jul;85(7):369–374. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Macdonald H. R., Glantz S. A. Political realities of statewide smoking legislation: the passage of California's Assembly Bill 13. Tob Control. 1997 Spring;6(1):41–54. doi: 10.1136/tc.6.1.41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Moore S., Wolfe S. M., Lindes D., Douglas C. E. Epidemiology of failed tobacco control legislation. JAMA. 1994 Oct 19;272(15):1171–1175. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Samuels B. E., Begay M. E., Hazan A. R., Glantz S. A. Philip Morris's failed experiment in Pittsburgh. J Health Polit Policy Law. 1992 Summer;17(2):329–351. doi: 10.1215/03616878-17-2-329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Samuels B., Glantz S. A. The politics of local tobacco control. JAMA. 1991 Oct 16;266(15):2110–2117. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Skolnick A. A. Antitobacco advocates fight 'illegal' diversion of tobacco control money. JAMA. 1994 May 11;271(18):1387-8, 1390. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Skolnick A. A. Court orders California governor to restore antismoking media campaign funding. JAMA. 1992 May 27;267(20):2721–2723. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Skolnick A. A. Judge rules diversion of antismoking money illegal, victory for California Tobacco Control Program. JAMA. 1995 Feb 22;273(8):610–611. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Stillman F. A., Becker D. M., Swank R. T., Hantula D., Moses H., Glantz S., Waranch H. R. Ending smoking at the Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions. An evaluation of smoking prevalence and indoor air pollution. JAMA. 1990 Sep 26;264(12):1565–1569. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Traynor M. P., Begay M. E., Glantz S. A. New tobacco industry strategy to prevent local tobacco control. JAMA. 1993 Jul 28;270(4):479–486. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Traynor M. P., Glantz S. A. California's tobacco tax initiative: the development and passage of Proposition 99. J Health Polit Policy Law. 1996 Fall;21(3):543–585. doi: 10.1215/03616878-21-3-543. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Woodruff T. J., Rosbrook B., Pierce J., Glantz S. A. Lower levels of cigarette consumption found in smoke-free workplaces in California. Arch Intern Med. 1993 Jun 28;153(12):1485–1493. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from American Journal of Public Health are provided here courtesy of American Public Health Association

RESOURCES