Skip to main content
PMC home page
Gut logoLink to Gut
. 1995 Jun;36(6):819–824. doi: 10.1136/gut.36.6.819

Prevalence and incidence of peptic ulcer disease in a Danish County--a prospective cohort study.

S J Rosenstock 1, T Jørgensen 1
PMCID: PMC1382615  PMID: 7615266

Abstract

Peptic ulcer prevalence and five year incidence were assessed in a sex and age stratified population sample of 3608 Danish subjects aged 30-60 years. Statements of peptic ulcer disease obtained from questionnaires were scrutinised by reviewing medical records. Life time ulcer prevalence (95% confidence intervals) was 5.6 (4.9-6.4) per cent. Male to female prevalence ratio was 2.2:1, and duodenal to gastric ulcer prevalence ratio was 3.8:1. Thirty two participants with no previous history of peptic ulceration developed an ulcer within the observation period resulting in a five year ulcer incidence of 11.3 (7.4-15.2) per 1000 persons at risk with no demonstrable sex difference. The prevalence of duodenal ulcer has declined in Denmark whereas gastric ulcer prevalence in men has increased slightly. A decline in male duodenal ulcer incidence has probably contributed to the low male to female ulcer incidence ratio, implying that women today incur the same risk of developing an ulcer as men. If such trends continue, they will bring about a new era in ulcer epidemiology characterised by equal incidence in men and women and an even distribution of lesions in the stomach and duodenum.

Full text

PDF
820

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bernersen B., Johnsen R., Straume B., Burhol P. G., Jenssen T. G., Stakkevold P. A. Towards a true prevalence of peptic ulcer: the Sørreisa gastrointestinal disorder study. Gut. 1990 Sep;31(9):989–992. doi: 10.1136/gut.31.9.989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bloom B. S. Cross-national changes in the effects of peptic ulcer disease. Ann Intern Med. 1991 Apr 1;114(7):558–562. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-114-7-558. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bloom B. S., Gessner U. Long-term technology assessment. Mortality, hospitalization, and work loss due to peptic ulcer and gastritis/duodenitis in the Federal Republic of Germany. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1989;5(2):215–226. doi: 10.1017/s0266462300006449. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bonnevie O. Survival in peptic ulcer. Gastroenterology. 1978 Dec;75(6):1055–1060. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bonnevie O. The incidence of duodenal ulcer in Copenhagen county. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1975;10(4):385–393. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bonnevie O. The incidence of gastric ulcer in Copenhagen county. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1975;10(3):231–239. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Brazer S. R., Tyor M. P., Pancotto F. S., Nickl N. J., Wildermann N. M., Harrell F. E., Jr, Pryor D. B. Studies of gastric ulcer disease by community-based gastroenterologists. Am J Gastroenterol. 1990 Jul;85(7):824–828. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Coggon D., Lambert P., Langman M. J. 20 years of hospital admissions for peptic ulcer in England and Wales. Lancet. 1981 Jun 13;1(8233):1302–1304. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(81)92470-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Fineberg H. V., Pearlman L. A. Surgical treatment of peptic ulcer in the United States. Trends before and after the introduction of cimetidine. Lancet. 1981 Jun 13;1(8233):1305–1307. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(81)92471-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Goenka M. K., Kochhar R., Ghosh P., Mehta S. K. Changing pattern of peptic ulcer in India. An endoscopic study of 1,188 ulcer patients. J Clin Gastroenterol. 1991 Oct;13(5):575–579. doi: 10.1097/00004836-199110000-00021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hagerup L., Geismar P., Rahbek I. Ulcussyddommen i en population af 50-årige. Fra Glostrupundersøgelsen 1964-65. Ugeskr Laeger. 1971 May 28;133(21):1022–1024. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Henry D. A., Johnston A., Dobson A., Duggan J. Fatal peptic ulcer complications and the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, aspirin, and corticosteroids. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1987 Nov 14;295(6608):1227–1229. doi: 10.1136/bmj.295.6608.1227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Jensen K. H., Jørgensen T. Incidence of gallstones in a Danish population. Gastroenterology. 1991 Mar;100(3):790–794. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(91)80027-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Johnsen R., Bernersen B., Straume B., Førde O. H., Bostad L., Burhol P. G. Prevalences of endoscopic and histological findings in subjects with and without dyspepsia. BMJ. 1991 Mar 30;302(6779):749–752. doi: 10.1136/bmj.302.6779.749. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Johnsen R., Straume B., Førde O. H., Burhol P. G. Changing incidence of peptic ulcer--facts or artefacts? A cohort study from Tromsø. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1992 Aug;46(4):433–436. doi: 10.1136/jech.46.4.433. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Jones R., Lydeard S. Prevalence of symptoms of dyspepsia in the community. BMJ. 1989 Jan 7;298(6665):30–32. doi: 10.1136/bmj.298.6665.30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Khuroo M. S., Mahajan R., Zargar S. A., Javid G., Munshi S. Prevalence of peptic ulcer in India: an endoscopic and epidemiological study in urban Kashmir. Gut. 1989 Jul;30(7):930–934. doi: 10.1136/gut.30.7.930. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kiaer T., Roin J., Djurhuus J., Niclassen S. D., Bonnevie O. Epidemiological aspects of peptic ulcer disease on the Faroe Islands. An interim report. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1985 Nov;20(9):1157–1162. doi: 10.3109/00365528509088888. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kurata J. H., Honda G. D., Frankl H. The incidence of duodenal and gastric ulcers in a large health maintenance organization. Am J Public Health. 1985 Jun;75(6):625–629. doi: 10.2105/ajph.75.6.625. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kurata J. H., Nogawa A. N., Abbey D. E., Petersen F. A prospective study of risk for peptic ulcer disease in Seventh-Day Adventists. Gastroenterology. 1992 Mar;102(3):902–909. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(92)90176-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kurata J. H. Ulcer epidemiology: an overview and proposed research framework. Gastroenterology. 1989 Feb;96(2 Pt 2 Suppl):569–580. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5085(89)80052-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. La Vecchia C., Lucchini F., Negri E., Reggi V., Levi F. The impact of therapeutic improvements in reducing peptic ulcer mortality in Europe. Int J Epidemiol. 1993 Feb;22(1):96–106. doi: 10.1093/ije/22.1.96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. MANTEL N., HAENSZEL W. Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1959 Apr;22(4):719–748. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Miettinen O. Estimability and estimation in case-referent studies. Am J Epidemiol. 1976 Feb;103(2):226–235. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a112220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Ostensen H., Gudmundsen T. E., Bolz K. D., Burhol P. G., Bonnevie O. The incidence of gastric ulcer and duodenal ulcer in north Norway. A prospective epidemiological study. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1985 Mar;20(2):189–192. doi: 10.3109/00365528509089655. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. PULVERTAFT C. N. Peptic ulcer in twon and country. Br J Prev Soc Med. 1959 Jul;13:131–138. doi: 10.1136/jech.13.3.131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Roberts R. S., Spitzer W. O., Delmore T., Sackett D. L. An empirical demonstration of Berkson's bias. J Chronic Dis. 1978 Feb;31(2):119–128. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(78)90097-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. SPONHEIM N. [Incidence and prevalence of peptic ulcer in a part of the country]. Nord Med. 1960 Mar 31;63:377–385. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Schön I. M., Mellström D., Odén A., Ytterberg B. O. Incidence of peptic ulcer disease in Gothenburg, 1985. BMJ. 1989 Nov 4;299(6708):1131–1134. doi: 10.1136/bmj.299.6708.1131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Gut are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES