Full text
PDFdata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8c8ae/8c8aeda939ce24703cac76340c629772e4953c86" alt="551"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/41c80/41c8009074f63e77a99f50655615f76d7175b5cf" alt="552"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4e027/4e0270875ca8a007991538b1e945bf45a885f824" alt="553"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/95c3a/95c3aaa3b992e61cb490c737568ab42bcaa1d729" alt="554"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6cd71/6cd711e5ac93b7ce33d83f381a4c0b218fbb24c4" alt="555"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/61a71/61a71ce6d0db955eea9d20a0f265447d0ad1bbb8" alt="556"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9f214/9f21435541c3d75ea9b822263fd0c485e80e6fc2" alt="557"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d0277/d02774e42af0965cb7d7849c12b4afa21dd14790" alt="558"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/aec2d/aec2d126216262aafbf0e3670a2bb27a4de0b27e" alt="559"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/935ac/935ac01078202a704b81389dca64c7e9bf5acb23" alt="560"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e9275/e927571feb48f670c6986a01da15a9793ca5d465" alt="561"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/13b12/13b123ff67b3d31f1c43bad2533e76ce2f73aa9e" alt="562"
Images in this article
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- APPLEMAN R. M., PRIESTLEY J. T., GAGE R. P. CHOLELITHIASIS AND CHOLEDOCHOLITHIASIS: FACTORS THAT INFLUENCE RELATIVE INCIDENCE. Mayo Clin Proc. 1964 Jul;39:473–479. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- COLCOCK B. P., PEREY B. EXPLORATION OF THE COMMON BILE DUCT. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1964 Jan;118:20–24. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- FERRIS D. O., WEBER H. M. Evaluation of routine operative cholangiography. AMA Arch Surg. 1956 Aug;73(2):197–203. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1956.01280020011003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ginzburg L., Geffen A., Friedman I. H. Pseudo-obstruction following post-choledochotomy cholangiography. Ann Surg. 1967 Jul;166(1):83–90. doi: 10.1097/00000658-196707000-00010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Glenn F., McSherry C. K., Dineen P. Morbidity of surgical treatment for nonmalignant biliary tract disease. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1968 Jan;126(1):15–26. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- ISAACS J. P., DAVES M. L. Technique and evaluation of operative cholangiography. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1960 Jul;111:103–112. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- JOHNSTON E. V., WAUGH J. M., GOOD C. A. Residual stones in the common bile duct: the question of operative cholangiograms. Ann Surg. 1954 Mar;139(3):293–301. doi: 10.1097/00000658-195403000-00006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- MIXTER C. G., HERMANSON L., SEGEL A. L. Operative cholangiography: an evaluation of 406 cases. Ann Surg. 1951 Sep;134(3):346–350. doi: 10.1097/00000658-195109000-00005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- NIENHUIS L. I. Routine operative cholangiography: an evaluation. Ann Surg. 1961 Dec;154(6):192–202. doi: 10.1097/00000658-196112000-00026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- PAINE J. R., FIRME C. N. The problem of the overlooked common duct stone. Am Surg. 1954 Nov;20(11):1171–1179. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- SANDWEISS D. J., FULTON H. Intravenous cholangiography; results in one hundred cholecystectomized patients with upper abdominal symptoms. J Am Med Assoc. 1955 Nov 5;159(10):998–1001. doi: 10.1001/jama.1955.02960270018005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- SMITH S. W., ENGEL C., AVERBOOK B., LONGMIRE W. P., Jr Problems of retained and recurrent common bile duct stones. J Am Med Assoc. 1957 May 18;164(3):231–236. doi: 10.1001/jama.1957.02980030007002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]