Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 2006 Mar;44(3):693–699. doi: 10.1128/JCM.44.3.693-699.2006

Identification of Medically Important Yeast Species by Sequence Analysis of the Internal Transcribed Spacer Regions

Shiang Ning Leaw 1, Hsien Chang Chang 1, Hsiao Fang Sun 2, Richard Barton 3, Jean-Philippe Bouchara 4, Tsung Chain Chang 5,*
PMCID: PMC1393093  PMID: 16517841

Abstract

Infections caused by yeasts have increased in previous decades due primarily to the increasing population of immunocompromised patients. In addition, infections caused by less common species such as Pichia, Rhodotorula, Trichosporon, and Saccharomyces spp. have been widely reported. This study extensively evaluated the feasibility of sequence analysis of the rRNA gene internal transcribed spacer (ITS) regions for the identification of yeasts of clinical relevance. Both the ITS1 and ITS2 regions of 373 strains (86 species), including 299 reference strains and 74 clinical isolates, were amplified by PCR and sequenced. The sequences were compared to reference data available at the GenBank database by using BLAST (basic local alignment search tool) to determine if species identification was possible by ITS sequencing. Since the GenBank database currently lacks ITS sequence entries for some yeasts, the ITS sequences of type (or reference) strains of 15 species were submitted to GenBank to facilitate identification of these species. Strains producing discrepant identifications between the conventional methods and ITS sequence analysis were further analyzed by sequencing of the D1-D2 domain of the large-subunit rRNA gene for species clarification. The rates of correct identification by ITS1 and ITS2 sequence analysis were 96.8% (361/373) and 99.7% (372/373), respectively. Of the 373 strains tested, only 1 strain (Rhodotorula glutinis BCRC 20576) could not be identified by ITS2 sequence analysis. In conclusion, identification of medically important yeasts by ITS sequencing, especially using the ITS2 region, is reliable and can be used as an accurate alternative to conventional identification methods.


The incidence of fungal infections has increased in the past few decades. Invasive infections caused by yeasts have become a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients receiving immunosuppressive chemotherapy for cancer or organ transplantation or in immunodeficient patients, such as individuals with untreated AIDS (4, 13, 49). Candida albicans is the most common species causing a variety of infections. However, the incidence rates of non-C. albicans Candida infections have been increasing in recent years (46, 47). Moreover, outbreaks of systemic infections caused by yeasts in neonatal intensive care units have been described (6, 12, 20, 27, 36, 38). Recently, infections caused by less common yeast species such as Pichia, Rhodotorula, Trichosporon, and Saccharomyces spp. and other rarely encountered species have been reported (2, 16, 31, 44, 49, 51). More than 100 yeast species have been identified as human pathogens and have been isolated from virtually all body sites (14). Identification of the increasing diversity of pathogens by conventional methods may be difficult and sometimes inconclusive (34), especially for unusual yeast species.

The susceptibilities of different species to antifungal agents may be different (32, 52), and reliable identification of yeasts is helpful for treatment with appropriate antifungal agents. Commercially available biochemical and enzymatic panels, such as API ID32C (bioMérieux, Marcy-l'Etoile, France) and VITEK ID-YST (bioMérieux Vitek, Hazelwood, Mo.), are convenient for use. However, the disadvantages of limited databases (33) and misidentification using these kits (7, 24, 30) have been reported.

Molecular approaches have been developed to provide more rapid and accurate identification of fungi compared to traditional phenotypic methods. The internal transcribed spacer 1 and 2 (ITS1 and ITS2) regions of the rRNA gene operon have been used extensively for PCR-based systems for detection and identification of fungal pathogens in a variety of formats. These methods include PCR (24, 26), ITS fragment length polymorphism (3, 4, 46), restriction fragment length polymorphism (15, 28, 45), DNA probe hybridization (7, 10, 25, 29, 48), and DNA sequencing. Among these molecular methods, ITS sequence analysis has been proven to be an accurate method for species delineation (4, 5, 18, 19, 21, 39, 40). However, until now only a limited number of species or just a specific genus has been evaluated for species identification by ITS sequence analysis (4, 19, 39, 40).

For ITS sequence analysis, several questions remain to be answered: (i) is only the ITS1 or ITS2 sequence enough for yeast identification? (ii) is the ITS2 sequence more species specific than ITS1 or vice versa? (iii) can this approach be applied to most species of clinical importance? The aim of this study was to clarify these questions by testing 373 yeast strains from 86 species including type strains, reference strains, and clinical isolates.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Yeast strains.

A total of 373 strains from 86 species, including 41 Candida spp. (207 strains) and 45 non-Candida spp. (166 strains), were used in this study (Table 1). Among these yeasts, 299 were reference (or type) strains and 74 were clinical isolates. All reference strains were obtained from the Bioresources Collection and Research Center (BCRC; Hsinchu, Taiwan) and Centraalbureau voor Schimmelcultures (CBS; Utrecht, The Netherlands). Clinical isolates were obtained from the Mycology Reference Centre, Department of Microbiology, University of Leeds (Leeds, United Kingdom), the Laboratory of Parasitology and Mycology of Angers University Hospital (Angers, France), and the National Cheng Kung University Medical Center (Tainan, Taiwan). Isolates were identified to the species level based on traditional criteria (17) with the API ID32C system (bioMérieux Vitek).

TABLE 1.

ITS sequences of 15 yeast species submitted to GenBank

Species Strain no.a GenBank accession no.
ITS1 ITS2
Arthroascus schoenii BCRC 22503T AY936497 AY936498
Candida boidinii BCRC 20464T AY936499 AY936500
Candida cantarellii CBS 5383 AY936505 AY936506
Candida ciferrii BCRC 22168T AY936511 AY936512
Candida globosa CBS 162T AY936513 AY936514
Candida inconspicua BCRC 21658T AY936515 AY936516
Candida kruisii BCRC 21573T AY936517 AY936518
Candida maltosa BCRC 21614T AY936521 AY936522
Candida melibiosica CBS 5814T AY936523 AY936524
Candida norvegica BCRC 21616T AY936525 AY936526
Candida santamariae BCRC 21617T DQ066653 DQ066654
Candida silvicola CBS 4140T AY936529 AY936530
Candida steatolytica BCRC 21746T AY936531 AY936532
Candida utilis BCRC 20928T AY936535 AY936536
Kloeckera japonica CBS 2590 AY936537 AY936538
a

T, type strain.

DNA preparation.

Yeasts were subcultured on Sabouraud dextrose agar (Difco, Detroit, Mich.) and incubated at 28°C for 24 to 48 h. Colonies of these strains were suspended in saline to obtain a turbidity of 0.5 McFarland standard at a 530-nm wavelength. One milliliter of the cell suspension was centrifuged at 5,000 × g for 3 min in a microcentrifuge. The genomic DNA was extracted by using the Blood and Tissue Genomic DNA Extraction Miniprep system (Viogene, Taipei, Taiwan) in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions, except that the step of lyticase digestion of yeast cells was omitted. The extracted DNA was stored at −20°C for further use.

Amplification and sequencing of the ITS regions.

The fungus-specific universal primers ITS1 (5′-TCCGTAGGTGAACCTGCGG-3′) and ITS2 (5′-GCATCGATGAAGAACGCAGC-3′) were used to amplify the ITS1 region, while universal primers ITS3 (5′-GCATCGATGAAGAACGCAGC-3′) and ITS4 (5′-GCATATCAATAAGCGGAGGA-3′) were used to amplify the ITS2 region (50). PCR was performed in a total reaction volume of 50 μl consisting of 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.3), 50 mM KCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.8 mM deoxynucleoside triphosphates (0.2 mM each), 1.2 U of Taq DNA polymerase, 0.4 μM (each) of the ITS1 region primers (ITS1/ITS2) or the ITS2 region primers (ITS3/ITS4), 2 μl (1 to 5 ng) of DNA template, and 50 μl of a mineral oil overlay. PCR was carried out using the following conditions: initial denaturation at 94°C for 3 min; 30 cycles of denaturation (94°C for 1 min), annealing (60°C for 1 min), and extension (72°C for 1 min); and a final extension step at 72°C for 3 min. A negative control was performed with each run by replacing the template DNA with sterile water in the PCR mixture.

All amplicons were purified using the PCR-M Clean Up System (Viogene, Taipei, Taiwan). The DNA fragments were sequenced using an ABI Prism 377 automated DNA sequencer (Applied Biosystems, Taipei, Taiwan) with a BigDye Terminator cycle sequencing kit (version 3.1; Applied Biosystems). All amplicons were sequenced on both strands using primers ITS1 and ITS2 for the ITS1 region and primers ITS3 and ITS4 for the ITS2 region. After sequencing, portions of the 18S, 5.8S, and 26S rRNA gene sequences of the PCR products were removed to obtain the exact ITS1 and ITS2 sequences. For all yeasts, the sequences of the 3′ ends of the 18S and 5.8S rRNA genes were GCGGAAGGA TCATTA and GTTTGAGCGTCATTT, respectively, and the sequences of the 5′ ends of the 5.8S and 26S rRNA genes were AAACTTTCAACAA and GACCTCAAATCAG, respectively. Since the ITS sequences of 15 of the yeast species examined in this study are not currently available in the GenBank database, the ITS sequences of the type strain (or a reference strain) of each of these yeasts were submitted to GenBank (Table 1) to facilitate sequence comparison of strains belonging to these species.

Identification of yeast by ITS sequencing.

A total of 373 strains (86 species) including 41 Candida species (207 strains) and 45 non-Candida species (166 strains) were examined. Species were identified by searching databases using the BLAST sequence analysis tool (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST/). The ITS1 or ITS2 sequence was compared using nucleotide-nucleotide BLAST (blastn) with default settings except that sequences were not filtered for low complexity. Species identification was determined from the lowest expect value of the BLAST output. Occasionally, the BLAST search with the query sequence hit sequences from two different species with 100% identity. Under these conditions, the lengths of ITS1 and ITS2 were taken into consideration for species identification, since the lengths of both the ITS1 and ITS2 fragments are important characteristics of a fungal species (3, 4, 30, 46).

For strains producing discrepant identification between the methods based on phenotypic characteristics and ITS sequence analysis, the D1-D2 region of the large-subunit RNA gene was sequenced for species clarification. Primers NL1 (5′-GCATATCAATAAGCGGAGGAAAAG-3′) and NL4 (5′-GGTCCGTGTTTCAAGACGG-3′) (22) were used to amplify this region. The procedures for PCR amplification, PCR product purification, and sequencing of the PCR products were the same as those described for the ITS regions.

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.

The GenBank accession numbers of the ITS1 and ITS2 regions of type (or reference) strains of 15 species sequenced in this study are given in Table 1.

RESULTS

Amplification of ITS regions.

Both the ITS1 and ITS2 regions were successfully amplified from DNA from all strains by the fungus-specific universal primer pairs ITS1-ITS2 and ITS3-ITS4, respectively. The lengths of ITS1 ranged from 59 bp (Candida lipolytica) to 402 bp (C. glabrata), while the lengths of ITS2 ranged from 69 bp (C. haemulonii) to 261 bp (C. colliculosa) (data not shown). The ITS fragments of all species studied were less than 300 bp. However, the ITS1 fragments of C. glabrata (402 bp) and Saccharomyces cerevisiae (366 bp) were longer than 300 bp.

Identification of reference strains by ITS sequence analysis.

A total of 299 reference strains including 41 Candida species (146 strains) and 45 non-Candida species (153 strains) were analyzed (Table 2). By ITS1 sequence analysis, 290 strains (97%) were correctly identified to species level. Reference strains producing discrepant identification by phenotypic characteristics and ITS sequence analysis are listed in Table 3. Nine strains (C. intermedia BCRC 22567, C. melibiosica CBS 6211, C. silvicola [CBS 4069 and 4141], Pichia ohmeri [BCRC 21592, 22556, and 22557], Cryptococcus albidus CBS 969, and Rhodotorula glutinis BCRC 20576) were not identified by ITS1 sequencing. In the ITS1 regions, C. intermedia BCRC 22567, C. melibiosica CBS 6211, and Pichia ohmeri (BCRC 21592, 22556, and 22557) had sequence similarities of only 0.78, 0.65, and 0.76 to 0.89, respectively, with their corresponding type strains C. intermedia BCRC 21250, C. melibiosica CBS 5814, and Pichia ohmeri BCRC 22178 (listed in Tables 1 and 2). However, other strains of C. intermedia (BCRC 20863, 21250, and 21604) and Pichia ohmeri (BCRC 21349 and 22178) (Table 1) were correctly identified by ITS1 sequence analysis.

TABLE 2.

Yeast species and strains used in this study

Microorganism Reference strain(s) Clinical isolate(s) Total no. of strains
Ascomycetous yeast
    Arthroascus schoenii BCRC 21401, 22503T, 22504, CBS 2556 4
    Candida albicans BCRC 20511, 20512T, 20513, 21538, 22063 LMA 938838, 962507, 499010350, ATTC 66390, RB 1325, 1326, 1331 12
    C. boidiniia BCRC 20472, 21432, 21483, 21757 4
    C. cantarellii CBS 5445, 5654 2
    C. catenulata BCRC 21507, 22316T, CBS 564, 565, 1904 LMA 954976 6
    C. ciferrii BCRC 22408 1
    C. colliculosa BCRC 21429, 22074T, CBS 158, 6991 4
    C. dattila BCRC 22043, CBS 1877, 2803, 2860, 2907 5
    C. dubliniensis CBS 2747, 7987, 7988, 8500, 8501 RB 1168, 1271, 1306 8
    C. famata BCRC 22304, 22712, CBS 1791, 1792, 1795T 5
    C. freyschussii BCRC 21555T, CBS 2161 2
    C. glabrata BCRC 20586T, CBS 860, 861, 2175, 7307 LMA 901085, 905756, 945574, RB 1284, 1295, 1324 11
    C. globosa CBS 864 1
    C. guilliermondii BCRC 20862, 21500T, 21549, 21559 RB 1012, 1055, 1216 7
    C. haemulonii BCRC 21572T, CBS 6590, 7801, 7802 4
    C. holmii BCRC 21524T, 21999, 22000 3
    C. inconspicua CBS 990, 1735, 2833 LMA 90289, RB 1226 5
    C. intermedia BCRC 20863, 21250T, 21604, 22567 4
    C. kefyr BCRC 20516, 20517, 21269, 21355, 22057T LMA 911323, 938657, 938779, 944459, 947644, RB 1227 11
    C. krusei BCRC 20514T, 21321, 21720, 21796, 22342 LMA 911256, 945615, 948501, RB 1222, 1237, 1317 11
    C. lambica BCRC 21347, 22067T, 22068, 22071, 22090 LMA 937990 6
    C. lipolytica BCRC 20864, 21541, 21542, 21596 4
    C. lusitaniae BCRC 20326, 21387T, 21740, CBS 7270 LMA 932648, 947060, 947315, 948764, RB 1283, 1288, 1294 11
    C. maltosa BCRC 21327, 21482 2
    C. melibiosica CBS 6211 1
    C. membranaefaciens BCRC 21563, 22398T, 22399 3
    C. norvegensis BCRC 21851, 22096T, 22097, CBS 1911 4
    C. norvegica CBS 2670, 4737 2
    C. parapsilosis BCRC 20515T, 20865, 21253, 21544 43, 770, 8053, C4-2, LMA 938558, 961299, RB 1318, 1320 12
    C. pelliculosa BCRC 20857, 20858, 21359, 21741, 22583T LMA 892971, RB 766, 778, 913 9
    C. pintolopesii BCRC 21439, 22002, 22003, 22239 4
    C. rugosa BCRC 21356, 21709T RB 1158 3
    C. sake BCRC 21621T, CBS 5690, 5740 3
    C. santamariae BCRC 21562, CBS 4261, 4515T 3
    C. silvicola CBS 4069, 4141 2
    C. sphaerica BCRC 21716, 22153, 22154, 22055, 22604 5
    C. steatolytica BCRC 22232, CBS 7652 2
    C. tropicalis BCRC 20520T, 20521, 21436, 21437, 21560 LMA 9077, 921810, 945762, RB 1298, 1330 10
    C. utilis BCRC 20260, 20325, 20334, 20860, 21357 5
    C. valida BCRC 22069T, 21399, 21441 3
    C. viswanathii BCRC 21330T, 22554 2
    C. zeylanoides BCRC 21743T, 21749, 22396, CBS 947 LMA 91304 5
    Debaryomyces marama BCRC 21526, CBS 1958T 2
    Debaryomyces polymorphus BCRC 21413 1
    Dekkera bruxellensis BCRC 20932, 21414T, 21440, 21517, 21518, 21519 6
    Endomyces fibuligera BCRC 20455, 21379, 21380, 21449, 21465, 21511T 6
    Hansenula saturnus BCRC 20463, 21360, 21659, 21692, 21765 5
    Kloeckera apiculata BCRC 20539, 21362, CBS 312, 314, 2582 5
    Kloeckera apis BCRC 22105, 22106, 22112T, CBS 4378 4
    Kloeckera japonica CBS 281, 479T 2
    Kluyveromyces delphensis BCRC 22017, CBS 2170 2
    Kluyveromyces yarrowii BCRC 21747, 22822, CBS 2684, 8242 4
    Lodderomyces elongisporus BCRC 21390T, CBS 2606, 5912 3
    Pichia carsonii BCRC 21529, 22098T, CBS 4409, 5254 4
    Pichia etchellsii BCRC 21479T, CBS 2012, 5519, 5603 4
    Pichia farinosa BCRC 21368T, 21682, 21881 3
    Pichia ohmeri BCRC 21349, 21592, 22178T, 22556, 22557 5
    Pichia spartinae BCRC 22766T, CBS 6059, 6077, 6661 4
    Saccharomyces cerevisiae BCRC 20263, 20270, 20271, 20405, 20490, 21447T RB 1254, 1299 8
    Saccharomyces kluyveri BCRC 21498T, 21977, 22001, CBS 2861 4
    Zygosaccharomyces bisporus BCRC 21505T, 21725, 21726 3
    Zygosaccharomyces cidri BCRC 21728T, CBS 2950, 5666 3
    Zygosaccharomyces fermentati BCRC 21433, 21760T, 22453 3
    Zygosaccharomyces florentinus BCRC 21648T, CBS 748, 6078, 6703 4
Basidiomycetous yeast
    Cryptococcus albidus BCRC 20526, 21672T, 21860, CBS 969 LMA 935479 5
    Cryptococcus curvatus BCRC 21735, CBS 570, 2744, 8770 4
    Cryptococcus humicolus CBS 5123 1
    Cryptococcus daszewskae BCRC 21639T 1
    Cryptococcus laurentii BCRC 20527T, 21997 2
    Cryptococcus luteolus BCRC 22372T 1
    Cryptococcus neoformans BCRC 20528T, 20532, 22241, 22873, 22874, 22875, CBS 883, 919, 1622, 6955, 6997 LMA 94277, 925461, 935479, 957786, 959159, 49800123 17
    Cryptococcus uniguttulatus CBS 1727, 1730, 2770, 2994, 4257 5
    Rhodotorula glutinis BCRC 20576, 21418T 2
    Rhodotorula minuta BCRC 22482, 22483, 22484, 22485 4
    Rhodotorula rubra BCRC 21442, 21667T, 21712, 21713, 21770 5
    Sporobolomyces roseus BCRC 22375 1
    Sporobolomyces salmonicolor CBS 490, 4474 2
    Trichosporon aquatile BCRC 22271T, 22272, CBS 5973, 5988 4
    Trichosporon asahii CBS 2479, 2936, 4829, 7631 4
    Trichosporon cutaneum BCRC 21675T, 22273 LMA 94117, 94256, 931422, 931440 6
    Trichosporon debeurmannianum CBS 1896 1
    Trichosporon dermatis CBS 2043 1
    Trichosporon inkin BCRC 21503T, CBS 7613, 7629, 7655 4
    Trichosporon jirovecii CBS 6864, 6950 2
    Trichosporon mucoides CBS 7625T 1
    Trichosporon pullulans BCRC 22275, 22313, 22318T, CBS 2543 4
Total no. of strains 299 74 373
a

Three strains of Candida boidinii (BCRC 20472, 21432, and 21483) required assessment of the ITS1 and ITS2 lengths for accurate identification.

TABLE 3.

List of reference strains and clinical isolates that produced discrepant identification by phenotypic characteristics and ITS sequence analysis

Strain no. Species received as Species identification (% identity with sequences in GenBank) by:
ITS1 sequence ITS2 sequence D1-D2 sequence
Reference strains
    BCRC 22567 C. intermedia NIa C. intermedia (100) C. intermedia (99)
    CBS 6211 C. melibiosica NI C. melibiosica (100) C. melibiosica (100)
    CBS 4069 C. silvicola C. silvicola (100) C. silvicola (100) C. silvicola (99)
C. ernobii (100)
    CBS 4141 C. silvicola C. silvicola (100) C. silvicola (100) C. silvicola (99)
C. ernobii (100)
    BCRC 21592 Pichia ohmeri NI P. ohmeri (100) P. ohmeri (100)
    BCRC 22556 Pichia ohmeri NI P. ohmeri (100) P. ohmeri (100)
    BCRC 22557 Pichia ohmeri NI Pichia ohmeri (100) Pichia ohmeri (100)
    CBS 969 Cryptococcus albidus Cryptococcus adeliensis (100) Cryptococcus adeliensis (100) Cryptococcus adeliensis (100)
Cryptococcus albidus (100)
    BCRC 20576 Rhodotorula glutinis Rhodotorula glutinis (100) Rhodosporidium glutinis (100) Rhodotorula glutinis (100)
Rhodosporidium babjevae (100) Rhodosporidium babjevae (100) Rhodosporidium babjevae (100)
Rhodotorula graminis (100)
Clinical isolates
    RB 1168 C. dubliniensis C. albicans (100) C. albicans (100) C. albicans (100)
    RB 1055 C. guilliermondii C. parapsilosis (100) C. parapsilosis (100) C. parapsilosis (100)
    LMA 90289 C. inconspicua C. krusei (100) C. krusei (99) C. krusei (99)
    RB 1226 C. inconspicua C. glabrata (100) C. glabrata (100) C. glabrata (100)
    RB 1237 C. krusei Pichia norvegensis (99) P. norvegensis (99) P. norvegensis (99)
    LMA 948764 C. lusitaniae NI C. lusitaniae (100) C. lusitaniae (99)
    RB 1283 C. lusitaniae NI C. lusitaniae (100) C. lusitaniae (99)
    LMA 892971 C. pelliculosa NI Pichia fabianii (100) Pichia fabianii (100)
    RB 1158 C. rugosa Saccharomyces cerevisiae (99) S. cerevisiae (99) S. cerevisiae (100)
    LMA 935479 Cryptococcus albidus Cryptococcus neoformans (100) Cryptococcus neoformans (100) Cryptococcus neoformans (100)
    LMA 94117 Trichosporon cutaneum Trichosporon dermatis (100) T. dermatis (100) T. dermatis (100)
T. mucoides (100)
    LMA 94256 Trichosporon cutaneum Trichosporon dermatis (100) T. dermatis (100) T. dermatis (100)
T. mucoides (100)
    LMA 931422 Trichosporon cutaneum Trichosporon dermatis (100) T. dermatis (100) T. dermatis (100)
T. mucoides (100)
    LMA 931440 Trichosporon cutaneum Trichosporon dermatis (100) T. dermatis (100) T. dermatis (100)
T. mucoides (100)
a

NI, not identified.

A BLAST search revealed that C. silvicola (CBS 4069 and 4141), in addition to its own species, had an ITS1 sequence and length (199 bp) identical with those of the type strain of C. ernobii CBS 1737 (GenBank accession no. AY585212) (Table 3). The output of the BLAST search of the ITS1 sequence of Cryptococcus albidus CBS 969 also showed 100% sequence identity with Cryptococcus albidus CBS 1925 (GenBank accession no. AB051041) and Cryptococcus adeliensis CBS 8351 (GenBank accession no. AF145328). ITS1 sequencing revealed that Rhodotorula glutinis BCRC 20576, in addition to its own species, shared an identical sequence with Rhodosporidium babjevae CBS 7808 (GenBank accession no. AF444542). Therefore, these four strains (C. silvicola CBS 4069 and 4141, Cryptococcus albidus CBS 969, and Rhodotorula glutinis BCRC 20576) could not be unambiguously identified by ITS1 sequence analysis. However, other strains of Cryptococcus albidus (BCRC 20527, 21672, and 21860) and Rhodotorula glutinis (BCRC 21418) were correctly identified by ITS1 sequence analysis.

By ITS2 sequencing, 99.7% (298/299) of reference strains were correctly identified. In contrast to the ITS1 region, a BLAST search of the ITS2 sequences of Cryptococcus albidus CBS 969 matched only the ITS2 sequence (100% identity) of Cryptococcus adeliensis CBS 8351 (GenBank accession no. AF145328). Sequence comparison of the D1-D2 region also revealed that Cryptococcus albidus CBS 969 had 100% sequence identify with Cryptococcus adeliensis (GenBank accession no. AF137603). Since Cryptococcus albidus CBS 969 had identical sequences with Cryptococcus adeliensis CBS 8351 at the ITS1, ITS2, and D1-D2 regions, CBS 969 might be a misidentification of Cryptococcus adeliensis.

In the ITS2 region, sequence analysis of Rhodotorula glutinis BCRC 20576, in addition to its own species, revealed 100% identity with Rhodosporidium babjevae JCM 9283 (GenBank accession no. AB073235). Strain BCRC 20576 also had 100% sequence identity with Rhodosporidium babjevae A130 (GenBank accession no. AF485991) and Rhodotorula graminis KCTC 17088 (GenBank accession no. AF459705) in the D1-D2 domain. Thus, Rhodotorula glutinis BCRC 20576 could not be differentiated from Rhodosporidium babjevae in both the ITS1 and ITS2 regions and could not be differentiated from Rhodosporidium babjevae and Rhodotorula graminis in the D1-D2 domain. In summary, of the 299 reference strains tested, 290 (97%) and 298 (99.7%) strains were correctly identified by sequence analysis of the ITS1 and ITS2 regions, respectively. No strain was misidentified by sequence analysis of either the ITS1 or the ITS2 region.

Identification of clinical isolates by ITS sequence analysis.

A total of 74 clinical isolates, including 15 Candida species (61 strains) and 4 non-Candida species (13 strains), were analyzed. Three isolates (Candida lusitaniae LMA 948764, RB 1283, and C. pelliculosa LMA 892971) were not identified by ITS1 sequencing, since there were no matching sequences in the GenBank database. The identification of Candida lusitaniae LMA 948764 and RB 1283 was correct, as evidenced by sequencing of the ITS2 and D1-D2 regions. C. pelliculosa LMA 892971 was a misidentification of Pichia fabianii (GenBank accession no. AF335967), as confirmed by sequences of the ITS2 and D1-D2 regions (Table 3).

C. dubliniensis RB 1168, C. guilliermondii RB 1055, C. inconspicua LMA 90289, C. inconspicua RB 1226, C. krusei RB 1237, C. rugosa RB 1158, Cryptococcus albidus LMA 935479, and Trichosporon cutaneum (LMA 94117, 94256, 931422, and 931440) were misidentifications of C. albicans, C. parapsilosis, C. krusei, C. glabrata, Pichia norvegensis, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Cryptococcus neoformans, and Trichosporon dermatis, respectively, as revealed by sequence analysis of the ITS1, ITS2, and D1-D2 regions. However, in addition to Trichosporon dermatis (GenBank accesssion no. AY143555), a BLAST search of the D1-D2 sequences of Trichosporon cutaneum (LMA 94117, 94256, 931422, and 931440) revealed 100% identity with an additional sequence of Trichosporon mucoides CBS 7625 (GenBank accession no. AF075515). If the species names of those unidentified or misidentified clinical isolates were corrected according to their D1-D2 sequences, the identification rates of clinical isolates by ITS1 and ITS2 sequencing were 95.9% (71/74) and 100% (74/74), respectively. No misidentification of clinical isolates was caused by sequence analysis of either the ITS1 or the ITS2 region. If reference strains and clinical isolates were taken together, the identification rates were 96.8% (361/373) and 99.7% (372/373), respectively, by sequence analysis of the ITS1 and ITS2 regions.

DISCUSSION

In this study, the feasibility of using ITS sequencing for identification of clinically important yeasts was demonstrated. The whole procedure could be completed within 24 h from isolated colonies. With identification rates of 96.8% (ITS1) and 99.7% (ITS2), the present approach provides an accurate alternative for species delineation of clinically important yeasts. An important finding of this study was that the ITS2 sequence seems to be more species specific than the ITS1 sequence, and almost all clinically relevant species could be identified by using the ITS2 region alone, providing the ITS2 sequences corresponding to the unknown species are in the GenBank database.

In this study, it was found that the intraspecies sequence divergence of ITS1 is higher than that of ITS2. For example, of the four reference strains of C. intermedia tested, three were correctly identified while the remaining strain (BCRC 22567) was not identified by ITS1 sequencing (Tables 2 and 3). In addition, three reference strains of Pichia ohmeri (BCRC 21592, 22556, and 22557) not identified by ITS1 sequencing were accurately identified by their ITS2 sequences. Furthermore, although all seven clinical isolates of C. lusitaniae were unambiguously identified by ITS2 sequencing, two isolates (LMA 948764 and RB 1283) were not identified by ITS1 sequence analysis (Tables 2 and 3). It should be noted that the ITS1 sequence may not be sufficiently sensitive for identifying some species.

Cryptococcus albidus CBS 969 might be a misidentification of Cryptococcus adeliensis, since Cryptococcus albidus CBS 969 had 100% sequence identity with Cryptococcus adeliensis CBS 8351 in the ITS1, ITS2, and D1-D2 regions (Table 3). Multiple sequence alignment demonstrated that the nucleotides at positions 203 and 204 in the ITS2 region of Cryptococcus albidus are C and G (GenBank accession no. AB051026, AB051037, AB051040, and AB051042 to AB051044), respectively, whereas the two nucleotides are A and C, respectively, in strains of Cryptococcus adeliensis (AF145328, AY733078, and AY733079). Therefore, these two positions in the ITS2 regions could be used as a signature sequence to differentiate the two species. Rimek et al. (35) recently published an account of the first case of meningitis caused by Cryptococcus adeliensis in a patient with acute myeloid leukemia. Cryptococcus adeliensis can be misidentified as Cryptococcus albidus due to the high variability of phenotypic markers of the latter. Tintelnot and Losert (43) reexamined six isolates from their collection originally identified as Cryptococcus albidus and found that three of the six strains in fact turned out to be Cryptococcus adeliensis.

Molecular approaches are now being developed to provide a more rapid and objective identification of yeasts compared to traditional phenotypic methods. Ribosomal targets, especially the ITS1, ITS2, and D1-D2 domains of the RNA operon, have shown particular promise for molecular identification. At present, the sequences of the D1-D2 regions of almost all yeasts, including nonpathogenic species, have been determined (11, 22, 23). Analysis of ITS sequences has been carried out mainly for pathogenic yeast species (7, 8, 15, 24, 30, 39). It should be noted that four clinical isolates of Trichosporon cutaneum (LMA 94117, 94256, 931440, and 931442) were clearly identified as Trichosporon dermatis by either ITS1 or ITS2 sequencing (Table 3); however, the four isolates could not be identified as Trichosporon dermatis by sequence analysis in the D1-D2 domain. A BLAST search revealed that the four Trichosporon cutaneum isolates had 100% sequence identity with Trichosporon mucoides (GenBank accession no. AF075515) and Trichosporon dermatis in the D1-D2 domain. In this special case, sequence analysis of both ITS1 and ITS2 is more specific for identification of Trichosporon dermatis than sequence analysis of the D1-D2 region.

An additional advantage of using ITS sequences for yeast identification is length polymorphisms among different species (3, 4, 30, 46). In this study, an interesting example was the fact that a BLAST search revealed that three C. boidinii strains (BCRC 20472, 21432, and 21483) had 100% sequence identities with Pichia norvegensis ATCC 22977 (GenBank accession no. AF333096) (data not shown). However, the ITS1 and ITS2 lengths of C. boidinii were 268 and 189 bp, respectively, while the ITS1 and ITS2 lengths of Pichia norvegensis were 108 and 142 bp, respectively. For this reason, C. boidinii could be easily differentiated from Pichia norvegensis.

The GenBank database currently lacks ITS sequence entries for some yeast species. However, the number of ITS sequences available in public databases has increased rapidly in recent years, and the expanding database may improve the quality and accuracy of fungal identification (19). In this study, the ITS sequences (30 entries) of type (or reference) strains of 15 species were submitted to GenBank (Table 1) to facilitate sequence comparison of these species. As mentioned above, the ITS1 sequence has higher intraspecies divergence than the ITS2 sequence for some species. We also found that different groups of C. parapsilosis had divergent ITS1 sequences (data not shown) as previously reported (37), and this may explain why a relatively lower identification rate was obtained by ITS1 sequence analysis. However, through a multilocus (COX3, SADH, and SYA1) sequence typing scheme (42) and the fact that DNA sequence similarities were <90% in the ITS1 sequence, C. orthopsilosis and C. metapsilosis were proposed to replace the existing designations of C. parapsilosis groups II and III, respectively. The species C. parapsilosis is retained for group I isolates. It is anticipated that as more entries of ITS1 sequences become available in public databases, the accuracy of yeast identification based on ITS1 sequences will increase.

Phylogenetically closely related species sometimes cannot be identified by sequence analysis of both the ITS and D1-D2 regions (Table 3). In this study, it was found that Rhodotorula glutinis BCRC 20576 could not be differentiated from Rhodosporidium babjevae in the ITS1, ITS2, and D1-D2 regions. Recently, the intergenic spacer (IGS) region of the fungal rRNA operon was found to have high intraspecies sequence divergence, which might be useful for genotyping of Malassezia globosa (41) and Trichosporon asahii (40) and for differentiation of varieties of Cryptococcus neoformans (9). However, due to the high intraspecies divergence in the IGS region, this region may not be suitable for yeast identification.

Many uncommon yeasts are emerging as human pathogens, and their identification may pose a challenge. A rapid and reliable identification method is urgently needed as the incidence of fungal infections increases (49). The API ID32C strips or Vitek YBC cards are commonly used for yeast identification. The VITEK system has the advantage of speed (a 15-h incubation) compared to ID32C (a 48- to 72-h incubation). The ID32C kit has a relatively large database (1) for 69 species; however, additional tests are needed for species confirmation of 11 of the 69 species. With the advanced technology available for sequence analysis and with open access to sequence databases, DNA sequence analysis for microorganism identification is expected to become more popular in the future. In conclusion, the present results clearly demonstrate that sequence analysis of the ITS regions (especially ITS2) can reliably identify yeasts of clinical importance. The method is straightforward and can be completed within 24 h from isolated colonies.

Acknowledgments

This project was supported by grants (NSC93-2323-B006-007 and NSC93-2314-B006-117) from the National Science Council, Taiwan, Republic of China.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Buchaille, L., A. M. Freydiere, R. Guinet, and Y. Gille. 1998. Evaluation of six commercial systems for identification of medically important yeasts. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 17:479-488. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Cassone, M., P. Serra, R. Mondello, A. Girolamo, S. Scafetti, E. Pistella, and M. Venditti. 2003. Outbreak of Saccharomyces cerevisiae subtype boulardii fungemia in patients neighboring those treated with a probiotic preparation of the organism. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41:5340-5343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Chang, H. C., S. N. Leaw, A. H. Huang, T. L. Wu, and T. C. Chang. 2001. Rapid identification of yeasts in positive blood cultures by a multiplex PCR method. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39:3466-3471. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Chen, Y.-C., J. D. Eisner, M. M. Kattar, S. L. Rassoulian-Barrett, K. LaFe, S. L. Yarfitz, A. P. Limaye, and B. T. Cookson. 2000. Identification of medically important yeasts using PCR-based detection of DNA sequence polymorphisms in the internal transcribed spacer 2 region of the rRNA genes. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38:2302-2310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Chen, Y.-C., J. D. Eisner, M. M. Kattar, S. L. Rassoulian-Barrett, K. Lafe, U. Bui, A. P. Limaye, and B. T. Cookson. 2001. Polymorphic internal transcribed spacer region 1 DNA sequences identify medically important yeasts. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39:4042-4051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Chowdhary, A., K. Becker, W. Fegeler, H. C. Gugnani, L. Kapoor, V. S. Randhawa, and G. Mehta. 2003. An outbreak of candidemia due to Candida tropicalis in a neonatal intensive care unit. Mycoses 46:269-274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Coignard, C., S. F. Hurst, L. E. Benjamin, M. E. Brandt, D. W. Warnock, and C. J. Morrison. 2004. Resolution of discrepant results for Candida species identification by using DNA probes. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42:858-861. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.De Baere, T., G. Claeys, D. Swinne, C. Massonet, G. Verschraegen, A. Muylaert, and M. Vaneechoutte. 2002. Identification of cultured isolates of clinically important yeast species using fluorescent fragment length analysis of the amplified internally transcribed rRNA spacer 2 region. BMC Microbiol. 2:21-27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Diaz, M. R., T. Boekhout, B. Theelen, and J. W. Fell. 2000. Molecular sequence analyses of the intergenic spacer (IGS) associated with rDNA of the two varieties of the pathogenic yeast, Cryptococcus neoformans. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 23:535-545. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Elie, C. M., T. J. Lott, E. Reiss, and C. J. Morrison. 1998. Rapid identification of Candida species with species-specific DNA probes. J. Clin. Microbiol. 36:3260-3265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Fell, J. W., T. Boekhout, A. Fonseca, G. Scorzetti, and A. Statzell-Tallman. 2000. Biodiversity and systematics of basidiomycetous yeasts as determined by large-subunit rDNA D1/D2 domain sequence analysis. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 50:1351-1371. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Fotedar, R., U. Banerjee, and A. R. Chaudhary. 2000. Outbreak of systemic candidiasis in low birth weight pre-term infants at a neonatal intensive care unit. J. Mycol. Med. 110:100-104. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Freydiere, A. M., R. Guinet, and P. Boiron. 2001. Yeast identification in the clinical microbiology laboratory: phenotypical methods. Med. Mycol. 39:9-33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Fromtling, R. A., J. C. Rhodes, and D. M. Dixon. 2003. Taxonomy, classification, and morphology of the fungi, p. 1653-1658. In P. R. Murray, E. J. Baron, J. H. Jorgensen, M. A. Pfaller, and R. H. Yolken (ed.), Manual of clinical microbiology, 8th ed. ASM Press, Washington, D.C.
  • 15.Frutos, R. L., M. T. Fernández-Espinar, and A. Querol. 2004. Identification of species of the genus Candida by analysis of the 5.8S rRNA gene and the two ribosomal internal transcribed spacers. Antonie Leeuwenhoek 85:175-185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Han, X. Y., J. J. Tarrand, and E. Escudero. 2004. Infections by the yeast Kodomaea (Pichia) ohmeri: two cases and literature review. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 23:127-130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Hazen, K. C., and S. A. Howell. 2003. Candida, Cryptococcus, and other yeasts of medical importance, p. 1693-1711. In P. R Murray., E. J. Baron, J. H. Jorgensen, M. A., Pfaller, and R. H. Yolken (ed.), Manual of clinical microbiology, 8th ed. ASM Press, Washington, D.C.
  • 18.Henry, T., P. C. Iwen, and S. H. Hinrichs. 2000. Identification of Aspergillus species using internal transcribed spacer regions 1 and 2. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38:1510-1515. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Hinrikson, H. P., S. F. Hurst, T. J. Lott, D. W. Warnock, and C. J. Morrison. 2005. Assessment of ribosomal large-subunit D1-D2, internal transcribed spacer 1, and internal transcribed spacer 2 regions as targets for molecular identification of medically important Aspergillus species. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43:2092-2103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Huang, Y. C., H. S. Linty, H. L. Peng, and H. Y. Cheng. 1999. Outbreak of Candida parapsilosis fungemia in neonatal intensive care units, clinical implications and genotypic analysis. Infection 27:97-102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Iwen, P. C., S. H. Hinrichs, and M. E. Rupp. 2002. Utilization of the internal transcribed spacer regions as molecular targets to detect and identify human fungal pathogens. Med. Mycol. 40:87-109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kurtzman, C. P., and C. J. Robnett. 1997. Identification of clinically important ascomycetous yeasts based on nucleotide divergence in the 5′ end of the large-subunit (26S) ribosomal DNA gene. J. Clin. Microbiol. 35:1216-1223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kurtzman, C. P., and C. J. Robnett. 1998. Identification and phylogeny of ascomycetous yeasts from analysis of nuclear large subunit (26S) ribosomal DNA partial sequences. Antonie Leeuwenhoek 73:331-371. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Li, Y. L., S. N. Leaw, J. H. Chen, H. C. Chang, and T. C. Chang. 2003. Rapid identification of yeasts commonly found in positive blood cultures by amplification of the internal transcribed spacer regions 1 and 2. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 22:693-696. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Lindsley, M. D., S. F. Hurst, N. J. Iqbal, and C. J. Morrison. 2001. Rapid identification of dimorphic and yeast-like fungal pathogens using specific DNA probes. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39:3505-3511. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Luo, G., and T. G. Mitchell. 2002. Rapid identification of pathogenic fungi directly from cultures by using multiplex PCR. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40:2860-2865. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Lupetti, A., A. Tavanti, P. Davini, E. Ghelardi, V. Corsini, I. Merusi, A. Boldrini, M. Campa, and S. Senesi. 2002. Horizontal transmission of Candida parapsilosis candidemia in a neonatal intensive care unit. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40:2363-2369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Majoros, L., G. Karods, A. Belak, A. Maraz, L. Asztalos, E. Csanky, Z. Barta, and B. Szabo. 2003. Restriction enzyme analysis of ribosomal DNA shows that Candida inconspicua clinical isolates can be misidentified as Candida norvegensis with traditional diagnostic procedures. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41:5250-5253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Martin, C., D. Roberts, M. Van Der Weide, R. Rossau, G. Jannes, T. Smith, and M. Maher. 2000. Development of a PCR-based line probe assay for identification of fungal pathogens. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38:3735-3742. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Massonet, C., J. V. Eldere, M. Vaneechoutte, T. De Baere, J. Verhaegen, and K. Lagrou. 2004. Comparison of VITEK 2 with ITS2-fragment length polymorphism analysis for identification of yeast species. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42:2209-2211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Petrocheilou-Pschou, V., H. Prifti, E. Kostis, C. Papadimitriou, M. A. Dimopoulos, and S. Stamatelopoulos. 2001. Rhodotorula septicemia: case report and minireview. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 7:100-102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Pfaller, M. A., D. J. Diekema, S. A. Messer, R. J. Hollis, and R. N. Jones. 2003. In vitro activities of caspofungin compared with those of fluconazole and itraconazole against 3,959 clinical isolates of Candida spp., including 157 fluconazole-resistant isolates. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47:1068-1071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Ramani, R., S. Gromadzki, D. H. Pincus, I. F. Salkin, and V. Chaturvedi. 1998. Efficacy of API 20C and ID 32C systems for identification of common and rare clinical yeast isolates. J. Clin. Microbiol. 36:3396-3398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Reiss, E., K. Tanaka, G. Bruker, V. Chazalet, D. Coleman, J. P. Debeaupuis, R. Hanazawa, J. P. Latge, J. Lortholary, K. Makimura, C. J. Morrison, S. Y. Murayama, S. Naoe, S. Paris, J. Sarfati, K. Shibuya, D. Sullivan, K. Uchida, and H. Yamaguchi. 1998. Molecular diagnosis and epidemiology of fungal infections. Med. Mycol. 36(Suppl.):249-257. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Rimek, D., G. Haase, A. Lück, J. Casper, and A. Podbielski. 2004. First report of a case of meningitis caused by Cryptococcus adeliensis in a patient with acute myeloid leukemia. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42:481-483. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Roilides, E., E. Farmaki, J. Evdoridou, A. Francesconi, M. Kasai, J. Filioti, M. Tsivitanidou, D. Sofianou, G. Kremenopoulos, and T. J. Walsh. 2003. Candida tropicalis in a neonatal intensive care unit: epidemiologic and molecular analysis of an outbreak of infection with an uncommon neonatal pathogen. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41:735-741. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Roy, B., and S. A. Meyer. 1998. Confirmation of the distinct genotype groups within the form species Candida parapsilosis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 36:216-218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Shin, J. H., H. Kook, D. H. Shin, T. J. Hwang, M. Kim, S. P. Suh, and D. W. Ryang. 2000. Nosocomial cluster of Candida lipolytica fungemia in paediatric patients. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 19:344-349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Sugita, T., A. Nishikawa, R. Ikeda, and T. Shinoda. 1999. Identification of medically relevant Trichosporon species based on sequences of internal transcribed spacer regions and construction of a database for Trichosporon identification. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37:1985-1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Sugita, T., M. Nakajima, R. Ikeda, T. Matsushima, and T. Shinoda. 2002. Sequence analysis of the ribosomal DNA intergenic spacer 1 regions of Trichosporon species. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40:1826-1830. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Sugita, T., M. Kodama, M. Saito, T. Ito, Y. Kato, R. Tsuboi, and A. Nishikawa. 2003. Sequence diversity of the intergenic spacer region of the rRNA gene of Malassezia globosa colonizing the skin of patients with atopic dermatitis and healthy individuals. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41:3022-3027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Tavanti, A., A. D. Davidson, N. A. R. Gow, M. C. J. Maiden, and F. C. Odds. 2005. Candida orthopsilosis and Candida metapsilosis spp. nov. to replace Candida parapsilosis groups II and III. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43:284-292. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Tintelnot, K., and H. Losert. 2005. Isolation of Cryptococcus adeliensis from clinical samples and the environment in Germany. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43:1007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Toscano, C. M., and W. R. Jarvis. 1999. Emerging issues in nosocomial fungal infections. Curr. Infect. Dis. Rep. 1:347-361. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Trost, A., B. Graf, J. Eucker, O. Sezer, K. Possinger, U. B. Gobel, and T. Adam. 2004. Identification of clinically relevant yeasts by PCR/RFLP. J. Microbiol. Methods 56:201-211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Turenne, C. Y., S. E. Sanche, D. J. Hoban, J. A. Karlowsky, and A. M. Kabani. 1999. Rapid identification of fungi by using the ITS2 genetic region and an automated fluorescent capillary electrophoresis system. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37:1846-1851. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Viscoli, C., C. Girmenia, A. Marinus, L. Collette, P. Martino, B. Vandercan, C. Doyer, B. Lebeau, D. Spence, V. Krcmery, B. De Pauw, F. Meunier, and the Invasive Fungal Infection Group of the EORTC. 1999. Candidemia in cancer patients: a prospective multicenter surveillance study by the Invasive Fungal Infection Group (IFIG) of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer(EORTC). Clin. Infect. Dis. 28:1071-1079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Wahyuningsih, R., H. J. Freisleben, H. G. Sonntag, and P. Schnitzler. 2000. Simple and rapid detection of Candida albicans DNA in serum by PCR for diagnosis of invasive candidiasis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38:3016-3021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Walsh, T. J., A. Groll, J. Hiemenz, R. Fleming, E. Roilides, and E. Anaissie. 2004. Infections due to emerging and uncommon medically important fungal pathogens. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 10(Suppl. 1):48-66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.White, T. J., T. Bruns, S. Lee, and J. Taylor. 1990. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics, p. 315-322. In M. A. Innis, D. H. Gelfand, J. J. Sninsky, and T. J. White (ed.), PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications. Academic Press, San Diego, Calif.
  • 51.Yang, R., J. Ao, W. Wang, K. Song, R. Li, and D. Wang. 2003. Disseminated trichosporonosis in China. Mycoses 46:519-523. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Zaas, A. K., M. Boyce, W. Schell, B. A. Lodge, J. L. Miller, and J. R. Perfect. 2003. Risk of fungemia due to Rhodotorula and antifungal susceptibility testing of Rhotodorula isolates. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41:5233-5235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES