Skip to main content
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 1937 Nov 26;91(2):101–126. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1937.sp003547

The effects of tetra-ethylammonium iodide on the electrical response and the accommodation of nerve1

S L Cowan, W G Walter
PMCID: PMC1395240  PMID: 16994922

Full text

PDF
124

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bouman H. D. The effect of electrotonus on the excitability of nerve. J Physiol. 1937 Feb 19;89(1):32–44. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1937.sp003460. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bugnard L., Hill A. V. The effect of frequency of excitation on the total electric response of medullated nerve. J Physiol. 1935 Mar 15;83(4):394–406. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1935.sp003237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cowan S. L., Ing H. R. Quaternary ammonium salts and the action currents in nerve. J Physiol. 1935 Apr 26;84(1):90–110. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1935.sp003259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cowan S. L., Ing H. R. The effect of quaternary ammonium salts upon nerve: Preliminary communication. J Physiol. 1933 Jul 28;79(1):75–82. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1933.sp003027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Katz B. Multiple response to constant current in frog's medullated nerve. J Physiol. 1936 Nov 6;88(2):239–255. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1936.sp003435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Lucas K. An analysis of changes and differences in the excitatory process of nerves and muscles based on the physical theory of excitation. J Physiol. 1910 May 11;40(3):225–249. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1910.sp001367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Lucas K. On the rate of development of the excitatory process in muscle and nerve. J Physiol. 1908 Dec 15;37(5-6):459–480. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1908.sp001283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Lucas K. On the rate of variation of the exciting current as a factor in electric excitation. J Physiol. 1907 Dec 31;36(4-5):253–274. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1907.sp001231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Matthews B. H. A new electrical recording system for physiological work. J Physiol. 1928 Jun 24;65(3):225–242. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1928.sp002472. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Matthews B. H. Specific nerve impulses. J Physiol. 1929 Mar 20;67(2):169–190. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1929.sp002560. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Mines G. R. On the spontaneous movements of amphibian skeletal muscle in saline solutions, with observations on the influence of potassium and calcium chlorides on muscular excitability. J Physiol. 1908 Dec 15;37(5-6):408–444. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1908.sp001281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Parkinson J. L. The effect of activity on the form of the muscle twitch. J Physiol. 1933 Apr 13;78(1):106–112. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1933.sp002990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES