Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 1971 Feb;212(3):739–761. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1971.sp009354

A study of the electrochemistry and osmotic relationships of the cochlear fluids in the neonatal rat at the time of the development of the endocochlear potential

S K Bosher, R L Warren
PMCID: PMC1395717  PMID: 5557069

Abstract

1. Changes in the endocochlear potential between the 8th and 18th days after birth were investigated in the rat. Initially the potential was low but its magnitude increased rapidly between the 11th and 16th day. During the 13th and 14th days the rate of increase was approximately 1 mV/hr.

2. The rapid potential increase arose virtually simultaneously in all three turns of the cochlea.

3. Histological examination revealed the cochlea, including the hair cells of Corti's organ and the stria vascularis, to be fully mature before the period of rapid change in the endocochlear potential, apart from the cells of Claudius, whose final development coincided with the latter part of this phase.

4. The endolymphatic sodium concentration (average 1·0 m-equiv/l.) had attained the very low adult level in the earliest period studied. The potassium and chloride concentrations were slightly below the normal adult levels, the result of some degree of general hypo-osmolality present at this time.

5. The endolymphatic ionic concentrations remained unchanged during the phase of rapid increase in the endocochlear potential.

6. The findings thus indicate that the distinctive endolymphatic ionic composition and the endocochlear potential arise largely independently and in succession during cochlear maturation.

7. No differences in osmotic pressure were demonstrated between endolymph, perilymph and serum. The problems concerning the homoeostasis of the inner ear fluids do not consequently seem to be complicated by unusual hydrodynamic aspects.

8. Alterations in body fluid osmolality, produced by intraperitoneal injection of water or hypertonic glycerol, were accompanied by simultaneous changes in the osmotic pressures of the inner ear fluids. Some portion of the membranes bounding the endolymphatic space is therefore considered to be freely permeable to water.

9. The investigations provide no further information about the nature of the endocochlear potential, although an increase in the electrical resistance of the cochlear duct membranes is thought responsible for its appearance. The time relationships of this period support the concept that the potential is an essential feature of the mechano-electric transduction process.

Full text

PDF
744

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BOSHER S. K., HALLPIKE C. S. OBSERVATIONS ON THE HISTOLOGICAL FEATURES, DEVELOPMENT AND PATHOGENESIS OF THE INNER EAR DEGENERATION OF THE DEAF WHITE CAT. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1965 Apr 13;162:147–170. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1965.0030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bosher S. K., Warren R. L. Observations on the electrochemistry of the cochlear endolymph of the rat: a quantitative study of its electrical potential and ionic composition as determined by means of flame spectrophotometry. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1968 Nov 5;171(1023):227–247. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1968.0066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. GISSELSSON L. [Electrical potentials of the inner ear]. Arch Ohren Nasen Kehlkopfheilkd. 1960;177:45–56. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Honrubia V., Ward P. H. Dependence of the cochlear microphonics and the summating potential on the endocochlear potential. J Acoust Soc Am. 1969 Aug;46(2):388–392. doi: 10.1121/1.1911701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Katsuki Y., Yanagisawa K., Kanzaki J. Tetraethylammonium and tetrodotoxin: effects on cochlear potentials. Science. 1966 Mar 25;151(3717):1544–1545. doi: 10.1126/science.151.3717.1544. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kikuchi K., Hilding D. A. The development of the stria vascularis in the mouse. Acta Otolaryngol. 1966 Oct-Nov;62(4):277–291. doi: 10.3109/00016486609119573. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kikuchi K., Hilding D. The development of the organ of Corti in the mouse. Acta Otolaryngol. 1965 Sep;60(3):207–222. doi: 10.3109/00016486509127003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Konishi T., Kelsey E. Effect of sodium deficiency on cochlear potentials. J Acoust Soc Am. 1968 Mar;43(3):462–470. doi: 10.1121/1.1910853. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Konishi T., Kelsey E. Effect of tetrodotoxin and procaine on cochlear potentials. J Acoust Soc Am. 1968 Mar;43(3):471–480. doi: 10.1121/1.1910854. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Konishi T., Mendelsohn M. Effect of ouabain on cochlear potentials and endolymph composition in guinea pigs. Acta Otolaryngol. 1970 Mar;69(3):192–199. doi: 10.3109/00016487009123353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kuijpers W., Bonting S. L. Studies on (Na+-K+)-activated ATPase. XXIV. Localization and properties of ATPase in the inner ear of the guinea pig. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1969 Apr;173(3):477–485. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(69)90012-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kuijpers W. Cation transport and cochlear function. Acta Otolaryngol. 1969 Feb-Mar;67(2):200–205. doi: 10.3109/00016486909125443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. MISRAHY G. A., HILDRETH K. M., CLARK L. C., SHINABARGER E. W. Measurement of the pH of the endolymph in the cochlea of guinea pigs. Am J Physiol. 1958 Aug;194(2):393–395. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1958.194.2.393. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. MISRAHY G. A., HILDRETH K. M., SHINABARGER E. W., GANNON W. J. Electrical properties of wall of endolymphatic space of the cochlea (guinea pig). Am J Physiol. 1958 Aug;194(2):396–402. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1958.194.2.396. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. SCHMIDT R. S., FERNANDEZ C. DEVELOPMENT OF MAMMALIAN ENDOCOCHLEAR POTENTIAL. J Exp Zool. 1963 Aug;153:227–235. doi: 10.1002/jez.1401530305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. SMITH C. A., LOWRY O. H., WU M. L. The electrolytes of the labyrinthine fluids. Laryngoscope. 1954 Mar;64(3):141–153. doi: 10.1288/00005537-195403000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. SUGA F., MORIMITSU T., MATSUO K. ENDOCOCHLEAR DC POTENTIAL: HOW IS IT MAINTAINED ALONG THE COCHLEAR TURNS? Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1964 Dec;73:924–933. doi: 10.1177/000348946407300405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES