Skip to main content
Annals of Surgery logoLink to Annals of Surgery
. 1979 Mar;189(3):317–321. doi: 10.1097/00000658-197903000-00012

Effect of sphincteroplasty on gallbladder function and bile composition.

M S Cohn, S I Schwartz, W W Faloon, J T Adams
PMCID: PMC1397105  PMID: 426563

Abstract

The effect of sphincteroplasty on bile concentration and composition and on gallbladder function was investigated in the dog. Gallbladder and hepatic bile samples were analyzed for cholesterol, phospholipid (lecithin), bile salt concentration and individual bile salt content. Motor function was studied by cholecystokinin-cholecystography with changes in gallbladder volume computed from the radiographs. All bile samples were cultured and at the conclusion of the experiments, the gallbladders were histologically examined. Sphincteroplasty did not alter biliary cholesterol concentration but the concentration of lecithin and bile salts decreased in gallbladder bile and increased in hepatic bile (p less than .001). These changes depict a trend toward greater lithogenicity for gallbladder bile and lesser lithogenicity for hepatic bile. Postoperative analysis of individual bile salts in gallbladder bile showed an increase in monohydroxy and dihydroxy bile salts and a decrease in trihydroxy bile salts (p less than .001). This tendency has been shown to be conducive to gallstone formation. The concentrating ability of the gallbladder was partially eliminated by sphincteroplasty but gallbladder filling and motor response to stimulation by cholecystokinin was not affected. All gallbladders demonstrated histologic changes of chronic inflammation and all developed a significant bacterial flora following sphincteroplasty. It is concluded that cholecystectomy should always be performed following transduodenal sphincteroplasty not because of any resultant abnormality of motor function, as has previously been held, but because of the resultant abnormality of gallbladder pathophysiology.

Full text

PDF
319

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Admirand W. H., Small D. M. The physicochemical basis of cholesterol gallstone formation in man. J Clin Invest. 1968 May;47(5):1043–1052. doi: 10.1172/JCI105794. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Banfield W. J. Physiology of the gallbladder. Gastroenterology. 1975 Sep;69(3):770–777. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. EISEMAN B., BROWN W. H., VIRABUTR S., GOTTESFELD S. Sphincterotomy; an evaluation of its physiologic rationale. AMA Arch Surg. 1959 Aug;79(2):294–303. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1959.04320080130015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Goldberg H. I., Moss A. A., Montgomery C. K., Amberg J. Contractility of the inflamed gallbladder: an experimental study using the technique of cholecystokinin cholecystography. Invest Radiol. 1972 Nov-Dec;7(6):447–454. doi: 10.1097/00004424-197211000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. JONES S. A., SMITH L. L., GREGORY G. Sphincteroplasty for recurrent pancreatitis; a second report. Ann Surg. 1958 Feb;147(2):180–190. doi: 10.1097/00000658-195802000-00006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. JONES S. A., SMITH L. L. Transduodenal sphincteroplasty for recurrent pancreatitis; a preliminary report. Ann Surg. 1952 Dec;136(6):937–947. doi: 10.1097/00000658-195212000-00004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Jones S. A., Smith L. L. A reappraisal of sphincteroplasty (not sphincterotomy). Surgery. 1972 Apr;71(4):565–575. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Jones S. A. Sphincteroplasty (not sphincterotomy) in the treatment of biliary tract disease. Surg Clin North Am. 1973 Oct;53(5):1123–1137. doi: 10.1016/s0039-6109(16)40141-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. LARGE A. M. Regurgitation cholecystitis and cholelithiasis. Ann Surg. 1957 Oct;146(4):607–618. doi: 10.1097/00000658-195710000-00008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. LEMPKE R. E. The sphincter of Oddi and gallbladder function. I. Preservation of function after section and resection of the sphincter. Ann Surg. 1960 Nov;152:815–826. doi: 10.1097/00000658-196011000-00007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Midtvedt T. Microbial bile acid transformation. Am J Clin Nutr. 1974 Nov;27(11):1341–1347. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/27.11.1341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Redinger R. N., Small D. M. Bile composition, bile salt metabolism and gallstones. Arch Intern Med. 1972 Oct;130(4):618–630. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Rubulis A., Rubert M., Faloon W. W. Cholesterol lowering, fecal bile acid, and sterol changes during neomycin and colchicine. Am J Clin Nutr. 1970 Sep;23(9):1251–1259. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/23.9.1251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Shaffer E. A., Small D. M. Biliary lipid secretion in cholesterol gallstone disease. The effect of cholecystectomy and obesity. J Clin Invest. 1977 May;59(5):828–840. doi: 10.1172/JCI108705. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Tansy M. F., Innes D. L., Martin J. S., Kendall F. M. The role of the intramural common bile duct in the filling of the canine gallbladder. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1974 Oct;139(4):585–592. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Van der Linden W. Bile acid pattern of patients with and without gallstones. Gastroenterology. 1971 Jun;60(6):1144–1145. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Annals of Surgery are provided here courtesy of Lippincott, Williams, and Wilkins

RESOURCES