Skip to main content
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior logoLink to Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
. 1964 Jul;7(4):303–307. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1964.7-303

Effects of averaging data during stimulus generalization

Bernard Migler
PMCID: PMC1404246  PMID: 14176276

Abstract

Rats were trained to press two keys consecutively for reinforcement. During stimulus one (slow clicker) a 6-sec time delay was required between the two responses. During stimulus eight (fast clicker) no time delay was required between the two responses. When tested with intermediate stimuli (intermediate click rates) the median time delays emitted by the animals were intermediate between their performances on the original training stimuli, resulting in typical generalization gradients. Closer examination of the data revealed that the median values were not representative of the behavior of the animals.

Full text

PDF
307

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Blough D. S. Interresponse time as a function of continuous variables: a new method and some data. J Exp Anal Behav. 1963 Apr;6(2):237–246. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1963.6-237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. CROSS D. V., LANE H. L. On the discriminative control of concurrent responses: the relations among response frequency, latency, and topography in auditory generalization. J Exp Anal Behav. 1962 Oct;5:487–496. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1962.5-487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. GUTTMAN N., KALISH H. I. Discriminability and stimulus generalization. J Exp Psychol. 1956 Jan;51(1):79–88. doi: 10.1037/h0046219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. HANSON H. M. Effects of discrimination training on stimulus generalization. J Exp Psychol. 1959 Nov;58:321–334. doi: 10.1037/h0042606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. HEARST E. Concurrent generalization gradients for food-controlled and shock-controlled behavior. J Exp Anal Behav. 1962 Jan;5:19–31. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1962.5-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. HERRNSTEIN R. J., VAN SOMMERS P. Method for sensory scaling with animals. Science. 1962 Jan 5;135(3497):40–41. doi: 10.1126/science.135.3497.40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. HONIG W. K., DAY R. W. Discrimination and generalization on a dimension of stimulus difference. Science. 1962 Oct 5;138(3536):29–31. doi: 10.1126/science.138.3536.29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. LABERGE D. Generalization gradients in a discrimination situation. J Exp Psychol. 1961 Jul;62:88–94. doi: 10.1037/h0043035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. MIGLER B., BRADY J. V. TIMING BEHAVIOR AND CONDITIONED FEAR. J Exp Anal Behav. 1964 May;7:247–251. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1964.7-247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Sidman M. Stimulus generalization in an avoidance situation. J Exp Anal Behav. 1961 Apr;4(2):157–169. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1961.4-157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES