Skip to main content
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior logoLink to Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
. 1964 May;7(3):233–239. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1964.7-233

Stimulus aspects of aversive controls: stimulus generalization of conditioned suppression following discrimination training1

Howard S Hoffman, Morton Fleshler
PMCID: PMC1404411  PMID: 14143911

Abstract

A tone ending with unavoidable electrical shock was periodically presented to pigeons while they pecked a key for food. A second group of birds was exposed to these tone-shock contingencies and also to a second tone which never ended with shock. The gradient of stimulus generalization following training to a single stimulus was symmetrical, whereas the gradient following discrimination training was asymmetrical, but there was no evidence of peak shift. During testing, suppression to all tones gradually extinguished and in both groups the slope of the gradient increased markedly. A second experiment with the discrimination birds revealed that free shock caused a recovery of the gradient, but the asymmetry persisted.

Full text

PDF
236

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. FLESHLER M., HOFFMAN H. S. A progression for generating variable-interval schedules. J Exp Anal Behav. 1962 Oct;5:529–530. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1962.5-529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. GELLER I. The acquisition and extinction of conditioned suppression as a function of the base-line reinforcer. J Exp Anal Behav. 1960 Jul;3:235–240. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1960.3-235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. GYNTHER M. D. Differential eyelid conditioning as a function of stimulus similarity and strength of response to the CS. J Exp Psychol. 1957 Jun;53(6):408–416. doi: 10.1037/h0046212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. HANSON H. M. Effects of discrimination training on stimulus generalization. J Exp Psychol. 1959 Nov;58:321–334. doi: 10.1037/h0042606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. HOFFMAN H. S. A flexible connector for delivering shock to pigeons. J Exp Anal Behav. 1960 Oct;3:330–330. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. HOFFMAN H. S., FLESHLER M., JENSEN P. STIMULUS ASPECTS OF AVERSIVE CONTROLS: THE RETENTION OF CONDITIONED SUPPRESSION. J Exp Anal Behav. 1963 Oct;6:575–583. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1963.6-575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. HOFFMAN H. S., FLESHLER M. Stimulus factors in aversive controls: the generalization of conditioned suppression. J Exp Anal Behav. 1961 Oct;4:371–378. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1961.4-371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. HONIG W. K., THOMAS D. R., GUTTM AN N. Differential effects of continuous extinction and discrimination training on the generalization gradient. J Exp Psychol. 1959 Aug;58:145–152. doi: 10.1037/h0048484. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. JENKINS H. M., HARRISON R. H. Generalization gradients of inhibition following auditory discrimination learning. J Exp Anal Behav. 1962 Oct;5:435–441. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1962.5-435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. RAY O. S., STEIN L. Generalization of conditioned suppression. J Exp Anal Behav. 1959 Oct;2:357–361. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1959.2-357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES