Skip to main content
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior logoLink to Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
. 1963 Jul;6(3):343–347. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1963.6-343

Some effects of combined SDs1

Montrose M Wolf
PMCID: PMC1404442  PMID: 14001545

Abstract

When the individual SD components of a multiple schedule were combined, their control over a response summated, thus increasing the response probability to a point over that controlled by either of the SDs independently. Summation was concluded to be a phenomenon relevant for operant as well as respondent stimulus control (Pavlov, in Kimble, 1960; Hull, 1943). The results of the present study appear to be a special case of the general SD enhancement effect demonstrated by Hanson (1959) and by Pierrel and Sherman (1960).

Full text

PDF
345

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. DINSMOOR J. A. The effect of hunger on discriminated responding. J Abnorm Soc Psychol. 1952 Jan;47(1):67–72. doi: 10.1037/h0061273. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. HANSON H. M. Effects of discrimination training on stimulus generalization. J Exp Psychol. 1959 Nov;58:321–334. doi: 10.1037/h0042606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. PIERREL R., SHERMAN J. G. Generalization of auditory intensity following discrimination training. J Exp Anal Behav. 1960 Oct;3:313–322. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1960.3-313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES