Abstract
All small area analyses need to compare the observed variability in rates to that expected by chance alone, but the expected variability is usually not known. This paper uses patient-level data for five dental procedures to simulate the distributions of the summary statistics that are usually generated in such studies. These statistics are found to vary greatly even under the "null hypothesis" that all dentists are using procedures at the same rates. The simulated dentist rates are compared to observed rates obtained in a different study. These findings illustrate problems that can occur in small area analysis studies, and emphasize the importance of using statistical techniques that are appropriate for the data that are to be analyzed. Investigators should make every effort to obtain patient-level data, or at least to understand the underlying distribution of the number of procedures per patient, to avoid mistaking significant deviations from an incorrect model as evidence for significant variation among small areas.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Conrad D. A., Grembowski D., Milgrom P. Dental care demand: insurance effects and plan design. Health Serv Res. 1987 Aug;22(3):341–367. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Diehr P., Cain K., Connell F., Volinn E. What is too much variation? The null hypothesis in small-area analysis. Health Serv Res. 1990 Feb;24(6):741–771. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Diehr P. Small area statistics: large statistical problems. Am J Public Health. 1984 Apr;74(4):313–314. doi: 10.2105/ajph.74.4.313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Grembowski D., Conrad D. A., Milgrom P. Dental care demand among children with dental insurance. Health Serv Res. 1987 Feb;21(6):755–775. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McMahon L. F., Jr, Wolfe R. A., Tedeschi P. J. Variation in hospital admissions among small areas. A comparison of Maine and Michigan. Med Care. 1989 Jun;27(6):623–631. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198906000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McPherson K., Wennberg J. E., Hovind O. B., Clifford P. Small-area variations in the use of common surgical procedures: an international comparison of New England, England, and Norway. N Engl J Med. 1982 Nov 18;307(21):1310–1314. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198211183072104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wolfe R. A., Griffith J. R., McMahon L. F., Jr, Tedeschi P. J., Petroni G. R., McLaughlin C. G. Patterns of surgical and nonsurgical hospital use in Michigan communities from 1980 through 1984. Health Serv Res. 1989 Apr;24(1):67–82. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]