Skip to main content
PMC home page
American Journal of Public Health logoLink to American Journal of Public Health
. 1991 Jan;81(1):38–42. doi: 10.2105/ajph.81.1.38

The role of attitudes, beliefs, and personal characteristics of Italian physicians in the surgical treatment of early breast cancer.

A Liberati 1, G Apolone 1, A Nicolucci 1, C Confalonieri 1, R Fossati 1, R Grilli 1, V Torri 1, P Mosconi 1, A Alexanian 1
PMCID: PMC1404943  PMID: 1983914

Abstract

The influence of Italian physicians' attitudes, beliefs, and personal characteristics on medical decision making is examined in the case of surgical treatment of early breast cancer. Responses to a mail survey of 657 physicians from different specialties were analyzed comparing doctors recommending a radical procedure (9%) to those preferring a conservative procedure for younger patients only (25%), and those considering conservative surgery the treatment of choice regardless of patients' age (66%). The findings suggest that the likelihood of physicians' preferring a conservative procedure is influenced by their specialty and the extent to which they feel that a patient should have a role in the treatment decision more than by differences in the beliefs of treatment outcomes. Only preferences of the small group indicating radical surgery as the sole admissible treatment can be accounted for by ignorance or distrust of results of recent trials. These findings suggest that other than scientific factors guide many doctors in their decision making; they may help to explain why the diffusion of research results into clinical practice is often disappointingly slow.

Full text

PDF
42

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Deber R. B. The determinants of treatment choice in end-stage renal disease: can we generalize about decision making from specific studies? Med Decis Making. 1986 Oct-Dec;6(4):231–238. doi: 10.1177/0272989X8600600408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Deber R. B., Thompson G. G. Who still prefers aggressive surgery for breast cancer? Implications for the clinical applications of clinical trials. Arch Intern Med. 1987 Sep;147(9):1543–1547. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Donabedian A. The epidemiology of quality. Inquiry. 1985 Fall;22(3):282–292. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Fisher B., Bauer M., Margolese R., Poisson R., Pilch Y., Redmond C., Fisher E., Wolmark N., Deutsch M., Montague E. Five-year results of a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy and segmental mastectomy with or without radiation in the treatment of breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 1985 Mar 14;312(11):665–673. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198503143121101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gazet J. C., Rainsbury R. M., Ford H. T., Powles T. J., Coombes R. C. Survey of treatment of primary breast cancer in Great Britain. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1985 Jun 15;290(6484):1793–1795. doi: 10.1136/bmj.290.6484.1793. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Greenberg E. R., Stevens M. Recent trends in breast surgery in the United States and United Kingdom. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1986 Jun 7;292(6534):1487–1491. doi: 10.1136/bmj.292.6534.1487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kleinman J. C., Machlin S. R., Madans J., Makuc D., Feldman J. J. Changing practice in the surgical treatment of breast cancer. The national perspective. Med Care. 1983 Dec;21(12):1232–1242. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198312000-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Liberati A., Patterson W. B., Biener L., McNeil B. J. Determinants of physicians' preferences for alternative treatments in women with early breast cancer. Tumori. 1987 Dec 31;73(6):601–609. doi: 10.1177/030089168707300609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. McNeil B. J., Pauker S. G., Sox H. C., Jr, Tversky A. On the elicitation of preferences for alternative therapies. N Engl J Med. 1982 May 27;306(21):1259–1262. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198205273062103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Palmer R. H., Reilly M. C. Individual and institutional variables which may serve as indicators of quality of medical care. Med Care. 1979 Jul;17(7):693–717. doi: 10.1097/00005650-197907000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Treatment of breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 1985 Jul 11;313(2):116–118. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198507113130213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Urban J. A. Breast cancer 1985. What have we learned? Cancer. 1986 Feb 1;57(3):636–643. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19860201)57:3<636::aid-cncr2820570340>3.0.co;2-m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Veronesi U., Saccozzi R., Del Vecchio M., Banfi A., Clemente C., De Lena M., Gallus G., Greco M., Luini A., Marubini E. Comparing radical mastectomy with quadrantectomy, axillary dissection, and radiotherapy in patients with small cancers of the breast. N Engl J Med. 1981 Jul 2;305(1):6–11. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198107023050102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Yusuf S., Collins R., Peto R. Why do we need some large, simple randomized trials? Stat Med. 1984 Oct-Dec;3(4):409–422. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780030421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from American Journal of Public Health are provided here courtesy of American Public Health Association

RESOURCES