Skip to main content
Immunology logoLink to Immunology
. 1966 Aug;11(2):89–96.

Induction of antibody formation to goat erythrocytes in the developing chick embryo and effects of maternal antibody

J B Solomon
PMCID: PMC1423775  PMID: 5920797

Abstract

The formation of antibody to goat erythrocytes has been studied in embryos and young chicks. Opsonizing antibody was measured by accelerated clearance of antigen and the sensitivity of this technique compared with haemagglutination tests. A wide range of immunizing doses of goat erythrocytes was used; all induced immunity. Small amounts of antibody were detected as early as the day of hatching but vigorous antibody production did not occur until 3 days later. An immune response could be induced in 12-day-old embryos and the most vigorous response was obtained by injection of 14-day-old embryos. Antibody production was relatively poor between the fifteenth day of embryonic life and 15 days after hatching. This was due to the presence of maternal antibody.

Full text

PDF
96

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BARR M., GLENNY A. T., RANDALL K. J. Diphtheria immunization in young babies; a study of some factors involved. Lancet. 1950 Jan 7;1(6593):6–10. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(50)90213-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. BILLINGHAM R. E., BRENT L., MEDAWAR P. B. Tolerance of red cell antigens and transplantation immunity in chickens. Experientia. 1955 Nov 15;11(11):444–444. doi: 10.1007/BF02172551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. BURNET F. M., STONE J. D., EDNEY M. The failure of antibody production in the chick embryo. Aust J Exp Biol Med Sci. 1950 May;28(3):291–297. doi: 10.1038/icb.1950.29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. DRAY S. Effect of maternal isoantibodies on the quantitative expression of two allelic genes controlling gamma-globulin allotypic specificities. Nature. 1962 Aug 18;195:677–680. doi: 10.1038/195677a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Delhanty J. J., Solomon J. B. The nature of antibodies to goat erythrocytes in the developing chicken. Immunology. 1966 Aug;11(2):103–113. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. FRIEDMAN H., GABY W. L. Immunologic unresponsiveness to Shigella antigens in chickens. J Immunol. 1960 May;84:441–448. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. HIRATA A. A., SCHECHTMAN A. M. Studies on immunologic depression in chickens. J Immunol. 1960 Sep;85:230–239. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. HOERLEIN A. B. The influence of colostrum on antibody response in baby pigs. J Immunol. 1957 Feb;78(2):112–117. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. ISACSON P. Cellular transfer of antibody production from adult to embryo in domestic fowls. Yale J Biol Med. 1959 Dec;32:209–228. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. MITCHISON N. A. Tolerance of erythrocytes in poultry:induction and specificity. Immunology. 1962 May;5:341–358. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. NEIDERS M. E., ROWLEY D. A., FITCH F. W. The sustained suppression of hemolysin response in passively immunized rats. J Immunol. 1962 Jun;88:718–724. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. NOSSAL G. J. The immunological response of foetal mice to influenza virus. Aust J Exp Biol Med Sci. 1957 Dec;35(6):549–557. doi: 10.1038/icb.1957.57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Rowley D., Thöni M., Isliker H. Opsonic requirements for bacterial phagocytosis. Nature. 1965 Jul 10;207(993):210–211. doi: 10.1038/207210a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. SMITH R. T., EITZMAN D. V. THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE IMMUNE RESPONSE. CHARACTERIZATION OF THE RESPONSE OF THE HUMAN INFANT AND ADULT TO IMMUNIZATION WITH SALMONELLA VACCINES. Pediatrics. 1964 Feb;33:163–183. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. SOLOMON J. B. Actively acquired transplantation immunity in the chick embryo. Nature. 1963 Jun 22;198:1171–1173. doi: 10.1038/1981171a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. SOLOMON J. B., TUCKER D. F. ONTOGENESIS OF IMMUNITY TO ERYTHROCYTE ANTIGENS IN THE CHICK. Immunology. 1963 Nov;6:592–601. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. STEVENS K. M., PIETRYK H. C., CIMINERA J. L. Acquired immunological tolerance to a protein antigen in chickens. Br J Exp Pathol. 1958 Feb;39(1):1–7. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Solomon J. B. The appearance and nature of opsonins for goat erythrocytes during the development of the chicken. Immunology. 1966 Aug;11(2):79–87. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. UHR J. W., BAUMANN J. B. Antibody formation. I. The suppression of antibody formation by passively administered antibody. J Exp Med. 1961 May 1;113:935–957. doi: 10.1084/jem.113.5.935. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. VANALTEN P. J., SCHECHTMAN A. M. IMMUNITY IN EMBRYOS. ANAPHYLAXIS IN YOUNG CHICKS SUGGESTS A NEW EXPLANATION FOR SOME PUZZLING PROPERTIES OF EMBRYOS. J Exp Zool. 1963 Jul;153:187–196. doi: 10.1002/jez.1401530211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Immunology are provided here courtesy of British Society for Immunology

RESOURCES