Skip to main content

Some NLM-NCBI services and products are experiencing heavy traffic, which may affect performance and availability. We apologize for the inconvenience and appreciate your patience. For assistance, please contact our Help Desk at info@ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.

The Plant Cell logoLink to The Plant Cell
. 1998 Oct;10(10):1663–1676. doi: 10.1105/tpc.10.10.1663

Photoinduction of flower identity in vegetatively biased primordia.

F D Hempel 1, P C Zambryski 1, L J Feldman 1
PMCID: PMC143943  PMID: 9761793

Abstract

Far-red light and long photoperiods promote flowering in Arabidopsis. We report here that when 30-day-old vegetative plants were induced with a continuous light treatment enriched in far-red light, flowers developed directly from previously initiated primordia. Specifically, plants induced with our continuous incandescent-enriched (CI) treatment produced an average of two primary-axis nodes with a leaf/flower phenotype, indicating that approximately two leaf/paraclade primordia per plant produced an individual flower from tissue that typically would differentiate into a paraclade (secondary inflorescence). Assays for APETALA1::beta-glucuronidase activity during the CI photoinduction treatment indicated that the floral meristem identity gene APETALA1 was transcriptionally activated in primordia with a leaf/paraclade bias and in primordia committed to leaf/paraclade development. APETALA1::beta-glucuronidase activity levels were initially highest in young primordia but were not correlated strictly with primordium fate. These results indicate that primordium fate can be modified after primordium initiation and that developing primordia respond quantitatively to floral induction signals.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (10.2 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bernier G., Havelange A., Houssa C., Petitjean A., Lejeune P. Physiological Signals That Induce Flowering. Plant Cell. 1993 Oct;5(10):1147–1155. doi: 10.1105/tpc.5.10.1147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Blazquez MA, Green R, Nilsson O, Sussman MR, Weigel D. Gibberellins promote flowering of arabidopsis by activating the LEAFY promoter . Plant Cell. 1998 May;10(5):791–800. doi: 10.1105/tpc.10.5.791. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Blázquez M. A., Soowal L. N., Lee I., Weigel D. LEAFY expression and flower initiation in Arabidopsis. Development. 1997 Oct;124(19):3835–3844. doi: 10.1242/dev.124.19.3835. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bowman J. L., Smyth D. R., Meyerowitz E. M. Genetic interactions among floral homeotic genes of Arabidopsis. Development. 1991 May;112(1):1–20. doi: 10.1242/dev.112.1.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bradley D., Ratcliffe O., Vincent C., Carpenter R., Coen E. Inflorescence commitment and architecture in Arabidopsis. Science. 1997 Jan 3;275(5296):80–83. doi: 10.1126/science.275.5296.80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bradley D., Vincent C., Carpenter R., Coen E. Pathways for inflorescence and floral induction in Antirrhinum. Development. 1996 May;122(5):1535–1544. doi: 10.1242/dev.122.5.1535. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chien J. C., Sussex I. M. Differential regulation of trichome formation on the adaxial and abaxial leaf surfaces by gibberellins and photoperiod in Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh. Plant Physiol. 1996 Aug;111(4):1321–1328. doi: 10.1104/pp.111.4.1321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Coen E. S., Romero J. M., Doyle S., Elliott R., Murphy G., Carpenter R. floricaula: a homeotic gene required for flower development in antirrhinum majus. Cell. 1990 Dec 21;63(6):1311–1322. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90426-f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Corbesier L., Gadisseur I., Silvestre G., Jacqmard A., Bernier G. Design in Arabidopsis thaliana of a synchronous system of floral induction by one long day. Plant J. 1996 Jun;9(6):947–952. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.1996.9060947.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Grainger R. M. Embryonic lens induction: shedding light on vertebrate tissue determination. Trends Genet. 1992 Oct;8(10):349–355. doi: 10.1016/0168-9525(92)90280-h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Grbić B., Bleecker A. B. An altered body plan is conferred on Arabidopsis plants carrying dominant alleles of two genes. Development. 1996 Aug;122(8):2395–2403. doi: 10.1242/dev.122.8.2395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Guo H., Yang H., Mockler T. C., Lin C. Regulation of flowering time by Arabidopsis photoreceptors. Science. 1998 Feb 27;279(5355):1360–1363. doi: 10.1126/science.279.5355.1360. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Halliday K. J., Koornneef M., Whitelam G. C. Phytochrome B and at Least One Other Phytochrome Mediate the Accelerated Flowering Response of Arabidopsis thaliana L. to Low Red/Far-Red Ratio. Plant Physiol. 1994 Apr;104(4):1311–1315. doi: 10.1104/pp.104.4.1311. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hempel F. D., Feldman L. J. Specification of chimeric flowering shoots in wild-type Arabidopsis. Plant J. 1995 Nov;8(5):725–731. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.1995.08050725.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hempel F. D., Weigel D., Mandel M. A., Ditta G., Zambryski P. C., Feldman L. J., Yanofsky M. F. Floral determination and expression of floral regulatory genes in Arabidopsis. Development. 1997 Oct;124(19):3845–3853. doi: 10.1242/dev.124.19.3845. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Huijser P., Klein J., Lönnig W. E., Meijer H., Saedler H., Sommer H. Bracteomania, an inflorescence anomaly, is caused by the loss of function of the MADS-box gene squamosa in Antirrhinum majus. EMBO J. 1992 Apr;11(4):1239–1249. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1992.tb05168.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Irish V. F., Sussex I. M. Function of the apetala-1 gene during Arabidopsis floral development. Plant Cell. 1990 Aug;2(8):741–753. doi: 10.1105/tpc.2.8.741. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kerstetter R. A., Poethig R. S. The specification of leaf identity during shoot development. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 1998;14:373–398. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.14.1.373. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Koornneef M., Hanhart C. J., van der Veen J. H. A genetic and physiological analysis of late flowering mutants in Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol Gen Genet. 1991 Sep;229(1):57–66. doi: 10.1007/BF00264213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Krizek B. A., Meyerowitz E. M. The Arabidopsis homeotic genes APETALA3 and PISTILLATA are sufficient to provide the B class organ identity function. Development. 1996 Jan;122(1):11–22. doi: 10.1242/dev.122.1.11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Lee I., Amasino R. M. Effect of Vernalization, Photoperiod, and Light Quality on the Flowering Phenotype of Arabidopsis Plants Containing the FRIGIDA Gene. Plant Physiol. 1995 May;108(1):157–162. doi: 10.1104/pp.108.1.157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Liljegren S. J., Yanofsky M. F. Genetic control of shoot and flower meristem behavior. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1996 Dec;8(6):865–869. doi: 10.1016/s0955-0674(96)80089-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Lincoln C., Long J., Yamaguchi J., Serikawa K., Hake S. A knotted1-like homeobox gene in Arabidopsis is expressed in the vegetative meristem and dramatically alters leaf morphology when overexpressed in transgenic plants. Plant Cell. 1994 Dec;6(12):1859–1876. doi: 10.1105/tpc.6.12.1859. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Mandel M. A., Gustafson-Brown C., Savidge B., Yanofsky M. F. Molecular characterization of the Arabidopsis floral homeotic gene APETALA1. Nature. 1992 Nov 19;360(6401):273–277. doi: 10.1038/360273a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Mandel M. A., Yanofsky M. F. A gene triggering flower formation in Arabidopsis. Nature. 1995 Oct 12;377(6549):522–524. doi: 10.1038/377522a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Martinez-Zapater J. M., Somerville C. R. Effect of Light Quality and Vernalization on Late-Flowering Mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Physiol. 1990 Mar;92(3):770–776. doi: 10.1104/pp.92.3.770. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Okamuro J. K., den Boer B. G., Lotys-Prass C., Szeto W., Jofuku K. D. Flowers into shoots: photo and hormonal control of a meristem identity switch in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Nov 26;93(24):13831–13836. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.24.13831. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Pouteau S., Nicholls D., Tooke F., Coen E., Battey N. The induction and maintenance of flowering in Impatiens. Development. 1997 Sep;124(17):3343–3351. doi: 10.1242/dev.124.17.3343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Putterill J., Robson F., Lee K., Simon R., Coupland G. The CONSTANS gene of Arabidopsis promotes flowering and encodes a protein showing similarities to zinc finger transcription factors. Cell. 1995 Mar 24;80(6):847–857. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90288-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Ratcliffe O. J., Amaya I., Vincent C. A., Rothstein S., Carpenter R., Coen E. S., Bradley D. J. A common mechanism controls the life cycle and architecture of plants. Development. 1998 May;125(9):1609–1615. doi: 10.1242/dev.125.9.1609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Reed J. W., Nagatani A., Elich T. D., Fagan M., Chory J. Phytochrome A and Phytochrome B Have Overlapping but Distinct Functions in Arabidopsis Development. Plant Physiol. 1994 Apr;104(4):1139–1149. doi: 10.1104/pp.104.4.1139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Shannon S., Meeks-Wagner D. R. A Mutation in the Arabidopsis TFL1 Gene Affects Inflorescence Meristem Development. Plant Cell. 1991 Sep;3(9):877–892. doi: 10.1105/tpc.3.9.877. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Simon R., Igeño M. I., Coupland G. Activation of floral meristem identity genes in Arabidopsis. Nature. 1996 Nov 7;384(6604):59–62. doi: 10.1038/384059a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Smith L. G., Hake S., Sylvester A. W. The tangled-1 mutation alters cell division orientations throughout maize leaf development without altering leaf shape. Development. 1996 Feb;122(2):481–489. doi: 10.1242/dev.122.2.481. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Telfer A., Bollman K. M., Poethig R. S. Phase change and the regulation of trichome distribution in Arabidopsis thaliana. Development. 1997 Feb;124(3):645–654. doi: 10.1242/dev.124.3.645. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Weigel D., Alvarez J., Smyth D. R., Yanofsky M. F., Meyerowitz E. M. LEAFY controls floral meristem identity in Arabidopsis. Cell. 1992 May 29;69(5):843–859. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90295-n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Weigel D., Nilsson O. A developmental switch sufficient for flower initiation in diverse plants. Nature. 1995 Oct 12;377(6549):495–500. doi: 10.1038/377495a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Weigel D. The genetics of flower development: from floral induction to ovule morphogenesis. Annu Rev Genet. 1995;29:19–39. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.29.120195.000315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Zachgo S., Silva E. de A., Motte P., Tröbner W., Saedler H., Schwarz-Sommer Z. Functional analysis of the Antirrhinum floral homeotic DEFICIENS gene in vivo and in vitro by using a temperature-sensitive mutant. Development. 1995 Sep;121(9):2861–2875. doi: 10.1242/dev.121.9.2861. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. van den Berg C., Willemsen V., Hage W., Weisbeek P., Scheres B. Cell fate in the Arabidopsis root meristem determined by directional signalling. Nature. 1995 Nov 2;378(6552):62–65. doi: 10.1038/378062a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Plant Cell are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES