Skip to main content
British Medical Journal (Clinical Research Ed.) logoLink to British Medical Journal (Clinical Research Ed.)
. 1984 Nov 3;289(6453):1201–1204. doi: 10.1136/bmj.289.6453.1201

Audit of admission to medical school: I--Acceptances and rejects.

I C McManus, P Richards
PMCID: PMC1443353  PMID: 6437485

Abstract

A prospective study of the process of application, selection, and admission to medical school was performed. St Mary's Hospital Medical School received 1478 UCCA applications for admission in October 1981: 94 (6.4%) applicants entered St Mary's in October 1981, 436 (29.5%) entered other medical schools, 176 (11.9%) read a subject other than medicine, and 772 (52.2%) did not enter university. The study included 12.6% of all applicants and 12.9% of all entrants to British medical schools in October 1981. Educational qualifications, demographic variables, type of schooling, family background, and the manner of application were examined in relation to overall selection. A level achievement was the major determinant of acceptance. O level achievement, early application, and medical parents had significant but smaller independent effects on the chance of acceptance. Social class, age, sex, and school type did not predict acceptance when corrected for academic and other factors. Few differences in personality, career preference, cultural interests or attitudes were found between those accepted and those rejected.

Full text

PDF
1204

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Anderson J., Hughes D., Wakeford R. Medical student selection: a tentative attempt to establish a code of practice. Br Med J. 1980 May 17;280(6225):1216–1218. doi: 10.1136/bmj.280.6225.1216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bagg D. G. A-levels and university performance. Nature. 1970 Mar 21;225(5238):1105–1108. doi: 10.1038/2251105a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bennett M., Wakeford R. Health policy, student selection and curriculum reform. Health Policy Educ. 1982 Jul;3(2):173–181. doi: 10.1016/0165-2281(82)90035-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Johnson M. L. Non-academic factors in medical school selection: a report on rejected applicants. Br J Med Educ. 1971 Dec;5(4):264–268. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1971.tb01837.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Linke R. D., Chalmers J. P., Ashton J. M. A survey of opinion among different occupational groups toward selection of medical students. Med Educ. 1981 Nov;15(6):414–421. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1981.tb02424.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Lucas C. J., Crown S., Stringer P., Supramaniam S. Further observation on study difficulty in university students including 'syllabus-boundess'. Br J Psychiatry. 1976 Dec;129:598–603. doi: 10.1192/bjp.129.6.598. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. McManus I. C. A-level grades and medical school admission. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1982 May 29;284(6329):1654–1656. doi: 10.1136/bmj.284.6329.1654. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. McManus I. C. The social class of medical students. Med Educ. 1982 Mar;16(2):72–75. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1982.tb01227.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Parkhouse J. The control of medical education. J R Soc Med. 1979 Jun;72(6):453–459. doi: 10.1177/014107687907200612. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Tomilson R. W., Clack G. B., Pettingale K. W., Anderson J., Ryan K. C. The relative role of "A" level chemistry, physics and biology in the medical course. Med Educ. 1977 Mar;11(2):103–108. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1977.tb00569.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Medical Journal (Clinical research ed.) are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES