Skip to main content
Immunology logoLink to Immunology
. 1975 Aug;29(2):275–282.

The differential effect of cholera toxin on the lymphocyte stimulation induced by various mitogens.

T L Vischer, J J LoSpalluto
PMCID: PMC1445953  PMID: 169198

Abstract

BALB/c spleen cells (5 x 10(6)) were cultured in 1 ml of serum-free RPMI 1640 medium for 3 days in order to examine the effect of cholera enterotoxin (CN) and its spontaneously formed toxoid (CD) on lymphocyte stimulation. Stimulation was assessed after addition of [3H] thymidine for the last 16 hours of culture. One microgram of CN per culture markedly reduced the baseline of [3H] thymidine incorporation and the stimulation due to phytohaemagglutinin (PHA), concanavalin A (con A) and bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS). One microgram of CD diminished the base-line to half, abolished the response to PHA, reduced the response to con A and had very little effect on the LPS-induced stimulation. One-tenth the amount (0-1 mug) of both CN and CD affected only the PHA reaction. A secondary response to haemocyanin in vitro was not decreased by this lower dose. The effect of 1 mug on CN on the LPS response could be reduced by pretreatment of the cells with CD, whereas the PHA reaction remained markedly diminished. Dibutyryl-cAMP added to culture tubes had a similar effect ot 1 mug of CN, affecting the PHA response much more than the response to LPS. Spleen cells of mice immunized with CD gave a significant proliferative response to both 1 mug of CD and CN. The results are interpreted as indicating a strong inhibitory effect of CN mediated by accumulation of intracellular cAMP. CD-immunized cells contain specific receptors for both CD and CN which probably compete with the sites responsible for adenylate cyclase stimulation by CN.

Full text

PDF
276

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bourne H. R., Lehrer R. I., Lichtenstein L. M., Weissmann G., Zurier R. Effects of cholera enterotoxin on adenosine 3',5'-monophosphate and neutrophil function. Comparison with other compounds which stimulate leukocyte adenyl cyclase. J Clin Invest. 1973 Mar;52(3):698–708. doi: 10.1172/JCI107231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Finkelstein R. A., Fujita K., LoSpalluto J. J. Procholeragenoid: an aggregated intermediate in the formation of choleragenoid. J Immunol. 1971 Oct;107(4):1043–1051. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Finkelstein R. A., LoSpalluto J. J. Pathogenesis of experimental cholera. Preparation and isolation of choleragen and choleragenoid. J Exp Med. 1969 Jul 1;130(1):185–202. doi: 10.1084/jem.130.1.185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Finkelstein R. A., LoSpalluto J. J. Production of highly purified choleragen and choleragenoid. J Infect Dis. 1970 May;121(Suppl):63+–63+. doi: 10.1093/infdis/121.supplement.s63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gallily R., Garvey J. S. Primary stimulation of rats and mice with hemocyanin in soluton and adsorbed on bentonite. J Immunol. 1968 Nov;101(5):924–929. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Harris G. Further studies of antigen stimulation of deoxyribonucleic acid synthesis in rabbit spleen cell cultures. II. The effects of specific antibody. Immunology. 1968 Mar;14(3):415–423. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Henney C. S., Bourne H. R., Lichtenstein L. M. The role of cyclic 3',5' adenosine monophosphate in the specific cytolytic activity of lymphocytes. J Immunol. 1972 Jun;108(6):1526–1534. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Holmgren J., Lindholm L., Lönnroth I. Interaction of cholera toxin and toxin derivatives with lymphocytes. I. Binding properties and interference with lectin-induced cellular stimulation. J Exp Med. 1974 Apr 1;139(4):801–819. doi: 10.1084/jem.139.4.801. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kimberg D. V., Field M., Johnson J., Henderson A., Gershon E. Stimulation of intestinal mucosal adenyl cyclase by cholera enterotoxin and prostaglandins. J Clin Invest. 1971 Jun;50(6):1218–1230. doi: 10.1172/JCI106599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Koopman W. J., Gillis M. H., David J. R. Prevention of MIF activity by agents known to increase cellular cyclic AMP. J Immunol. 1973 Jun;110(6):1609–1614. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Immunology are provided here courtesy of British Society for Immunology

RESOURCES