Skip to main content
CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal logoLink to CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal
. 1990 May 15;142(10):1069–1076.

Coronary thrombolysis--clinical guidelines and public policy: results of an Ontario practitioner survey.

C D Naylor 1, A A Hollenberg 1, A M Ugnat 1, A Basinski 1
PMCID: PMC1452017  PMID: 2110859

Abstract

The Ontario Medical Association (OMA) guidelines for intravenous thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction were released in March 1988 and contributed to a government decision against special per-case funding to assist hospitals using tissue-type plasminogen activator (tPA). In October 1988, 1512 cardiologists, internists and physician-administrators who were OMA members were mailed a questionnaire seeking their views on the OMA guidelines and related issues. Of the 419 questionnaires (28%) that were returned, 392 contained usable responses. Among the respondents 268 (68%) had used thrombolytic drugs in the preceding 12 months; the mean number of cases was 10.6 (standard deviation 12.9). A strong or a mild preference for tPA over streptokinase was registered by 64% of the respondents; 28% had no preference. However, the self-reported ratio of actual streptokinase:tPA use was about 3:1, and 73% indicated that the government's funding policy had limited the availability of tPA in their hospital. The respondents were almost equally divided as to whether the policy should be changed. The guidelines were deemed helpful by 85% of the noncardiologists, as opposed to 52% of the cardiologists (p less than 0.005). OMA involvement in developing and circulating such guidelines was supported by 74% of the respondents and opposed by 18%; opposition was more likely to come from those who found the guidelines unhelpful (p less than 0.001). Support for involvement by the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario was much weaker (supported by 32%, opposed by 62%). Overwhelming opposition to government involvement was evident.

Full text

PDF
1070

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Ezzell C. TPA too costly for medical use. Nature. 1988 Apr 14;332(6165):577–577. doi: 10.1038/332577b0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Horlick L. Managing hypercholesterolemia. CMAJ. 1989 Nov 1;141(9):861–866. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Naylor C. D., Armstrong P. W. Guidelines for the use of intravenous thrombolytic agents in acute myocardial infarction. Ontario Medical Association Consensus Group on Thrombolytic Therapy. CMAJ. 1989 Jun 1;140(11):1289–1299. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Verstraete M., Bernard R., Bory M., Brower R. W., Collen D., de Bono D. P., Erbel R., Huhmann W., Lennane R. J., Lubsen J. Randomised trial of intravenous recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator versus intravenous streptokinase in acute myocardial infarction. Report from the European Cooperative Study Group for Recombinant Tissue-type Plasminogen Activator. Lancet. 1985 Apr 13;1(8433):842–847. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(85)92208-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Wilcox R. G., von der Lippe G., Olsson C. G., Jensen G., Skene A. M., Hampton J. R. Trial of tissue plasminogen activator for mortality reduction in acute myocardial infarction. Anglo-Scandinavian Study of Early Thrombolysis (ASSET). Lancet. 1988 Sep 3;2(8610):525–530. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(88)92656-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association Journal are provided here courtesy of Canadian Medical Association

RESOURCES