Skip to main content
PMC home page
Immunology logoLink to Immunology
. 1971 Jun;20(6):1001–1008.

Cellular immunity in casein-induced amyloidosis

E S Cathcart, M Mullarkey, A S Cohen
PMCID: PMC1455953  PMID: 5558026

Abstract

Guinea-pigs receiving multiple subcutaneous injections of casein at first developed a cellular immune response to casein but this rapidly waned when the animals became amyloidotic. By contrast, cellular immune responsiveness to non-specific antigens at first appeared to be diminished but later returned to normal under the same conditions. These results suggest that tolerance to a specific immunogen may play an important role in the pathogenesis of casein-induced amyloidosis.

Full text

PDF
1003

Images in this article

1005FIG. 4
on p.1005
1006FIG. 5
on p.1006

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. ADLER F. L. Antibody formation after injection of heterologous immune globulin. II. Competition of antigens. J Immunol. 1957 Mar;78(3):201–210. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Asherson G. L. Antigen-mediated depression of delayed hypersensitivity. Br Med Bull. 1967 Jan;23(1):24–29. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bmb.a070510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cathcart E. S., Mullarkey M., Cohen A. S. Amyloidosis: an expression of immunological tolerance? Lancet. 1970 Sep 26;2(7674):639–640. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(70)91403-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Clerici E., Pierpaoli W., Romussi M. Experimental amyloidodis in immunity. Pathol Microbiol (Basel) 1965;28(5):806–815. doi: 10.1159/000161835. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. DAVID J. R., AL-ASKARI S., LAWRENCE H. S., THOMAS L. DELAYED HYPERSENSITIVITY IN VITRO. I. THE SPECIFICITY OF INHIBITION OF CELL MIGRATION BY ANTIGENS. J Immunol. 1964 Aug;93:264–273. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dresser D. W., Mitchison N. A. The mechanism of immunological paralysis. Adv Immunol. 1968;8:129–181. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2776(08)60466-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. LIACOPOULOS P., NEVEU T. NON-SPECIFIC INHIBITION OF THE IMMEDIATE AND DELAYED TYPES OF HYPERSENSITIVITY DURING IMMUNE PARALYSIS OF ADULT GUINEA-PIGS. Immunology. 1964 Jan;7:26–39. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Lehner T., Cameron J. S., Ward R. G. Lymphocyte transformation in patients with amyloidosis. Clin Exp Immunol. 1970 Mar;6(3):439–444. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Letterer E., Kretschmer R. Experimental amyloidosis and tolerance. Nature. 1966 Apr 23;210(5034):390–391. doi: 10.1038/210390a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Muckle T. J. Impaired immunity in the etiology of amyloidosis: a speculative review. Isr J Med Sci. 1968 Sep-Oct;4(5):1020–1034. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Ranlov P., Jensen E. Homograft reaction in amyloidotic mice. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand. 1966;67(2):161–164. doi: 10.1111/apm.1966.67.2.161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Rodey G. E., Good R. A. Modification of the in vitro response to phytohemagglutinin of mouse spleen cells by amyloidogenic agents. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1969 Jun;131(2):457–461. doi: 10.3181/00379727-131-33901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Immunology are provided here courtesy of British Society for Immunology

RESOURCES