Skip to main content
PMC home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1998 May;149(1):37–44. doi: 10.1093/genetics/149.1.37

How optimized is the translational machinery in Escherichia coli, Salmonella typhimurium and Saccharomyces cerevisiae?

X Xia 1
PMCID: PMC1460137  PMID: 9584084

Abstract

The optimization of the translational machinery in cells requires the mutual adaptation of codon usage and tRNA concentration, and the adaptation of tRNA concentration to amino acid usage. Two predictions were derived based on a simple deterministic model of translation which assumes that elongation of the peptide chain is rate-limiting. The highest translational efficiency is achieved when the codon recognized by the most abundant tRNA reaches the maximum frequency. For each codon family, the tRNA concentration is optimally adapted to codon usage when the concentration of different tRNA species matches the square-root of the frequency of their corresponding synonymous codons. When tRNA concentration and codon usage are well adapted to each other, the optimal content of all tRNA species carrying the same amino acid should match the square-root of the frequency of the amino acid. These predictions are examined against empirical data from Escherichia coli, Salmonella typhimurium, and Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (139.9 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Akashi H. Synonymous codon usage in Drosophila melanogaster: natural selection and translational accuracy. Genetics. 1994 Mar;136(3):927–935. doi: 10.1093/genetics/136.3.927. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bennetzen J. L., Hall B. D. Codon selection in yeast. J Biol Chem. 1982 Mar 25;257(6):3026–3031. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bilgin N., Ehrenberg M., Kurland C. Is translation inhibited by noncognate ternary complexes? FEBS Lett. 1988 Jun 6;233(1):95–99. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(88)81362-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bonekamp F., Andersen H. D., Christensen T., Jensen K. F. Codon-defined ribosomal pausing in Escherichia coli detected by using the pyrE attenuator to probe the coupling between transcription and translation. Nucleic Acids Res. 1985 Jun 11;13(11):4113–4123. doi: 10.1093/nar/13.11.4113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bulmer M. Codon usage and intragenic position. J Theor Biol. 1988 Jul 8;133(1):67–71. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5193(88)80024-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bulmer M. Coevolution of codon usage and transfer RNA abundance. Nature. 1987 Feb 19;325(6106):728–730. doi: 10.1038/325728a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bulmer M. The selection-mutation-drift theory of synonymous codon usage. Genetics. 1991 Nov;129(3):897–907. doi: 10.1093/genetics/129.3.897. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gouy M., Gautier C. Codon usage in bacteria: correlation with gene expressivity. Nucleic Acids Res. 1982 Nov 25;10(22):7055–7074. doi: 10.1093/nar/10.22.7055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hartl D. L., Moriyama E. N., Sawyer S. A. Selection intensity for codon bias. Genetics. 1994 Sep;138(1):227–234. doi: 10.1093/genetics/138.1.227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ikemura T. Codon usage and tRNA content in unicellular and multicellular organisms. Mol Biol Evol. 1985 Jan;2(1):13–34. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Ikemura T. Correlation between the abundance of Escherichia coli transfer RNAs and the occurrence of the respective codons in its protein genes: a proposal for a synonymous codon choice that is optimal for the E. coli translational system. J Mol Biol. 1981 Sep 25;151(3):389–409. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(81)90003-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Ikemura T. Correlation between the abundance of yeast transfer RNAs and the occurrence of the respective codons in protein genes. Differences in synonymous codon choice patterns of yeast and Escherichia coli with reference to the abundance of isoaccepting transfer RNAs. J Mol Biol. 1982 Jul 15;158(4):573–597. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(82)90250-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Liljenström H., von Heijne G. Translation rate modification by preferential codon usage: intragenic position effects. J Theor Biol. 1987 Jan 7;124(1):43–55. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5193(87)80251-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Martin A. P. Metabolic rate and directional nucleotide substitution in animal mitochondrial DNA. Mol Biol Evol. 1995 Nov;12(6):1124–1131. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Moriyama E. N., Hartl D. L. Codon usage bias and base composition of nuclear genes in Drosophila. Genetics. 1993 Jul;134(3):847–858. doi: 10.1093/genetics/134.3.847. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Pedersen S. Escherichia coli ribosomes translate in vivo with variable rate. EMBO J. 1984 Dec 1;3(12):2895–2898. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1984.tb02227.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Robinson M., Lilley R., Little S., Emtage J. S., Yarranton G., Stephens P., Millican A., Eaton M., Humphreys G. Codon usage can affect efficiency of translation of genes in Escherichia coli. Nucleic Acids Res. 1984 Sep 11;12(17):6663–6671. doi: 10.1093/nar/12.17.6663. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Sharp P. M., Cowe E., Higgins D. G., Shields D. C., Wolfe K. H., Wright F. Codon usage patterns in Escherichia coli, Bacillus subtilis, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Schizosaccharomyces pombe, Drosophila melanogaster and Homo sapiens; a review of the considerable within-species diversity. Nucleic Acids Res. 1988 Sep 12;16(17):8207–8211. doi: 10.1093/nar/16.17.8207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Sharp P. M., Devine K. M. Codon usage and gene expression level in Dictyostelium discoideum: highly expressed genes do 'prefer' optimal codons. Nucleic Acids Res. 1989 Jul 11;17(13):5029–5039. doi: 10.1093/nar/17.13.5029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Sharp P. M., Li W. H. An evolutionary perspective on synonymous codon usage in unicellular organisms. J Mol Evol. 1986;24(1-2):28–38. doi: 10.1007/BF02099948. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Sharp P. M., Li W. H. The codon Adaptation Index--a measure of directional synonymous codon usage bias, and its potential applications. Nucleic Acids Res. 1987 Feb 11;15(3):1281–1295. doi: 10.1093/nar/15.3.1281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Sørensen M. A., Kurland C. G., Pedersen S. Codon usage determines translation rate in Escherichia coli. J Mol Biol. 1989 May 20;207(2):365–377. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(89)90260-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Varenne S., Buc J., Lloubes R., Lazdunski C. Translation is a non-uniform process. Effect of tRNA availability on the rate of elongation of nascent polypeptide chains. J Mol Biol. 1984 Dec 15;180(3):549–576. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(84)90027-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Williams D. P., Regier D., Akiyoshi D., Genbauffe F., Murphy J. R. Design, synthesis and expression of a human interleukin-2 gene incorporating the codon usage bias found in highly expressed Escherichia coli genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 1988 Nov 25;16(22):10453–10467. doi: 10.1093/nar/16.22.10453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Williams D. P., Regier D., Akiyoshi D., Genbauffe F., Murphy J. R. Design, synthesis and expression of a human interleukin-2 gene incorporating the codon usage bias found in highly expressed Escherichia coli genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 1988 Nov 25;16(22):10453–10467. doi: 10.1093/nar/16.22.10453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Xia X. Maximizing transcription efficiency causes codon usage bias. Genetics. 1996 Nov;144(3):1309–1320. doi: 10.1093/genetics/144.3.1309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES