Skip to main content
PMC home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1998 May;149(1):367–382. doi: 10.1093/genetics/149.1.367

Quantitative trait loci affecting differences in floral morphology between two species of monkeyflower (Mimulus).

H D Bradshaw Jr 1, K G Otto 1, B E Frewen 1, J K McKay 1, D W Schemske 1
PMCID: PMC1460141  PMID: 9584110

Abstract

Conspicuous differences in floral morphology are partly responsible for reproductive isolation between two sympatric species of monkeyflower because of their effect on visitation of the flowers by different pollinators. Mimulus lewisii flowers are visited primarily by bumblebees, whereas M. cardinalis flowers are visited mostly by hummingbirds. The genetic control of 12 morphological differences between the flowers of M. lewisii and M. cardinalis was explored in a large linkage mapping population of F2 plants n = 465 to provide an accurate estimate of the number and magnitude of effect of quantitative trait loci (QTLs) governing each character. Between one and six QTLs were identified for each trait. Most (9/12) traits appear to be controlled in part by at least one major QTL explaining >/=25% of the total phenotypic variance. This implies that either single genes of individually large effect or linked clusters of genes with a large cumulative effect can play a role in the evolution of reproductive isolation and speciation.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (303.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Andersson L., Haley C. S., Ellegren H., Knott S. A., Johansson M., Andersson K., Andersson-Eklund L., Edfors-Lilja I., Fredholm M., Hansson I. Genetic mapping of quantitative trait loci for growth and fatness in pigs. Science. 1994 Mar 25;263(5154):1771–1774. doi: 10.1126/science.8134840. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Churchill G. A., Doerge R. W. Empirical threshold values for quantitative trait mapping. Genetics. 1994 Nov;138(3):963–971. doi: 10.1093/genetics/138.3.963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Coyne J. A. Genetics and speciation. Nature. 1992 Feb 6;355(6360):511–515. doi: 10.1038/355511a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Doebley J., Stec A. Inheritance of the morphological differences between maize and teosinte: comparison of results for two F2 populations. Genetics. 1993 Jun;134(2):559–570. doi: 10.1093/genetics/134.2.559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Georges M., Nielsen D., Mackinnon M., Mishra A., Okimoto R., Pasquino A. T., Sargeant L. S., Sorensen A., Steele M. R., Zhao X. Mapping quantitative trait loci controlling milk production in dairy cattle by exploiting progeny testing. Genetics. 1995 Feb;139(2):907–920. doi: 10.1093/genetics/139.2.907. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Grant V. Historical development of ornithophily in the western North American flora. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Oct 25;91(22):10407–10411. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.22.10407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Lande R., Thompson R. Efficiency of marker-assisted selection in the improvement of quantitative traits. Genetics. 1990 Mar;124(3):743–756. doi: 10.1093/genetics/124.3.743. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Lander E. S., Botstein D. Mapping mendelian factors underlying quantitative traits using RFLP linkage maps. Genetics. 1989 Jan;121(1):185–199. doi: 10.1093/genetics/121.1.185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Lander E. S., Green P., Abrahamson J., Barlow A., Daly M. J., Lincoln S. E., Newberg L. A., Newburg L. MAPMAKER: an interactive computer package for constructing primary genetic linkage maps of experimental and natural populations. Genomics. 1987 Oct;1(2):174–181. doi: 10.1016/0888-7543(87)90010-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Lin J. Z., Ritland K. Construction of a genetic linkage map in the wild plant Mimulus using RAPD and isozyme markers. Genome. 1996 Feb;39(1):63–70. doi: 10.1139/g96-009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lin J. Z., Ritland K. Quantitative trait loci differentiating the outbreeding Mimulus guttatus from the inbreeding M. platycalyx. Genetics. 1997 Jul;146(3):1115–1121. doi: 10.1093/genetics/146.3.1115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Liu J., Mercer J. M., Stam L. F., Gibson G. C., Zeng Z. B., Laurie C. C. Genetic analysis of a morphological shape difference in the male genitalia of Drosophila simulans and D. mauritiana. Genetics. 1996 Apr;142(4):1129–1145. doi: 10.1093/genetics/142.4.1129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Paterson A. H., Lander E. S., Hewitt J. D., Peterson S., Lincoln S. E., Tanksley S. D. Resolution of quantitative traits into Mendelian factors by using a complete linkage map of restriction fragment length polymorphisms. Nature. 1988 Oct 20;335(6192):721–726. doi: 10.1038/335721a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Paterson A. H., Lin Y. R., Li Z., Schertz K. F., Doebley J. F., Pinson S. R., Liu S. C., Stansel J. W., Irvine J. E. Convergent domestication of cereal crops by independent mutations at corresponding genetic Loci. Science. 1995 Sep 22;269(5231):1714–1718. doi: 10.1126/science.269.5231.1714. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Stuber C. W., Lincoln S. E., Wolff D. W., Helentjaris T., Lander E. S. Identification of genetic factors contributing to heterosis in a hybrid from two elite maize inbred lines using molecular markers. Genetics. 1992 Nov;132(3):823–839. doi: 10.1093/genetics/132.3.823. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Stuber C. W., Lincoln S. E., Wolff D. W., Helentjaris T., Lander E. S. Identification of genetic factors contributing to heterosis in a hybrid from two elite maize inbred lines using molecular markers. Genetics. 1992 Nov;132(3):823–839. doi: 10.1093/genetics/132.3.823. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Tanksley S. D. Mapping polygenes. Annu Rev Genet. 1993;27:205–233. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.27.120193.001225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Williams J. G., Kubelik A. R., Livak K. J., Rafalski J. A., Tingey S. V. DNA polymorphisms amplified by arbitrary primers are useful as genetic markers. Nucleic Acids Res. 1990 Nov 25;18(22):6531–6535. doi: 10.1093/nar/18.22.6531. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Zeng Z. B. Precision mapping of quantitative trait loci. Genetics. 1994 Apr;136(4):1457–1468. doi: 10.1093/genetics/136.4.1457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES