Abstract
The study of gene regulation has shown that a variety of molecular mechanisms are capable of performing this essential function. The physiological implications of these various designs and the conditions that might favor their natural selection are far from clear in most instances. Perhaps the most fundamental alternative is that involving negative or positive modes of control. Induction of gene expression can be accomplished either by removing a restraining element, which permits expression from a high-level promoter, or by providing a stimulatory element, which facilitates expression from a low-level promoter. This particular design feature is one of the few that is well understood. According to the demand theory of gene regulation, the negative mode will be selected for the control of a gene whose function is in low demand in the organism's natural environment, whereas the positive mode will be selected for the control of a gene whose function is in high demand. These qualitative predictions are well supported by experimental evidence. Here we develop the quantitative implications of this demand theory. We define two key parameters: the cycle time C, which is the average time for a gene to complete an ON/OFF cycle, and demand D, which is the fraction of the cycle time that the gene is ON. Mathematical analysis involving mutation rates and growth rates in different environments yields equations that characterize the extent and rate of selection. Further analysis of these equations reveals two thresholds in the C vs. D plot that create a well-defined region within which selection of wild-type regulatory mechanisms is realizable. The theory also predicts minimum and maximum values for the demand D, a maximum value for the cycle time C, as well as an inherent asymmetry between the regions for selection of the positive and negative modes of control.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (184.7 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Datta A., Jinks-Robertson S. Association of increased spontaneous mutation rates with high levels of transcription in yeast. Science. 1995 Jun 16;268(5217):1616–1619. doi: 10.1126/science.7777859. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- LeClerc J. E., Li B., Payne W. L., Cebula T. A. High mutation frequencies among Escherichia coli and Salmonella pathogens. Science. 1996 Nov 15;274(5290):1208–1211. doi: 10.1126/science.274.5290.1208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Savageau M. A. Demand theory of gene regulation. II. Quantitative application to the lactose and maltose operons of Escherichia coli. Genetics. 1998 Aug;149(4):1677–1691. doi: 10.1093/genetics/149.4.1677. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Savageau M. A. Design of molecular control mechanisms and the demand for gene expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1977 Dec;74(12):5647–5651. doi: 10.1073/pnas.74.12.5647. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Savageau M. A. Genetic regulatory mechanisms and the ecological niche of Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1974 Jun;71(6):2453–2455. doi: 10.1073/pnas.71.6.2453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Savageau M. A. Regulation of differentiated cell-specific functions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1983 Mar;80(5):1411–1415. doi: 10.1073/pnas.80.5.1411. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]