Skip to main content
PMC home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1998 Oct;150(2):863–872. doi: 10.1093/genetics/150.2.863

Speciation and domestication in maize and its wild relatives: evidence from the globulin-1 gene.

H Hilton 1, B S Gaut 1
PMCID: PMC1460357  PMID: 9755214

Abstract

The grass genus Zea contains the domesticate maize and several wild taxa indigenous to Central and South America. Here we study the genetic consequences of speciation and domestication in this group by sampling DNA sequences from four taxa-maize (Zea mays ssp. mays), its wild progenitor (Z. mays ssp. parviglumis), a more distant species within the genus (Z. luxurians), and a representative of the sister genus (Tripsacum dactyloides). We sampled a total of 26 sequences from the glb1 locus, which encodes a nonessential seed storage protein. Within the Zea taxa sampled, the progenitor to maize contains the most sequence diversity. Maize contains 60% of the level of genetic diversity of its progenitor, and Z. luxurians contains even less diversity (32% of the level of diversity of Z. mays ssp. parviglumis). Sequence variation within the glb1 locus is consistent with neutral evolution in all four taxa. The glb1 data were combined with adh1 data from a previous study to make inferences about the population genetic histories of these taxa. Comparisons of sequence data between the two morphologically similar wild Zea taxa indicate that the species diverged approximately 700, 000 years ago from a common ancestor of intermediate size to their present populations. Conversely, the domestication of maize was a recent event that could have been based on a very small number of founding individuals. Maize retained a substantial proportion of the genetic variation of its progenitor through this founder event, but diverged rapidly in morphology.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (105.2 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Belanger F. C., Kriz A. L. Molecular basis for allelic polymorphism of the maize Globulin-1 gene. Genetics. 1991 Nov;129(3):863–872. doi: 10.1093/genetics/129.3.863. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Buckler E. S., 4th, Holtsford T. P. Zea systematics: ribosomal ITS evidence. Mol Biol Evol. 1996 Apr;13(4):612–622. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025621. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Doebley J., Renfroe W., Blanton A. Restriction site variation in the zea chloroplast genome. Genetics. 1987 Sep;117(1):139–147. doi: 10.1093/genetics/117.1.139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Eyre-Walker A., Gaut R. L., Hilton H., Feldman D. L., Gaut B. S. Investigation of the bottleneck leading to the domestication of maize. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Apr 14;95(8):4441–4446. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.8.4441. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gaut B. S., Clegg M. T. Nucleotide polymorphism in the Adh1 locus of pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum) (Poaceae). Genetics. 1993 Dec;135(4):1091–1097. doi: 10.1093/genetics/135.4.1091. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Gaut B. S., Morton B. R., McCaig B. C., Clegg M. T. Substitution rate comparisons between grasses and palms: synonymous rate differences at the nuclear gene Adh parallel rate differences at the plastid gene rbcL. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Sep 17;93(19):10274–10279. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.19.10274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hanson M. A., Gaut B. S., Stec A. O., Fuerstenberg S. I., Goodman M. M., Coe E. H., Doebley J. F. Evolution of anthocyanin biosynthesis in maize kernels: the role of regulatory and enzymatic loci. Genetics. 1996 Jul;143(3):1395–1407. doi: 10.1093/genetics/143.3.1395. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Heck G. R., Chamberlain A. K., Ho T. H. Barley embryo globulin 1 gene, Beg1: characterization of cDNA, chromosome mapping and regulation of expression. Mol Gen Genet. 1993 May;239(1-2):209–218. doi: 10.1007/BF00281620. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hey J. A multi-dimensional coalescent process applied to multi-allelic selection models and migration models. Theor Popul Biol. 1991 Feb;39(1):30–48. doi: 10.1016/0040-5809(91)90039-i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hey J., Kliman R. M. Population genetics and phylogenetics of DNA sequence variation at multiple loci within the Drosophila melanogaster species complex. Mol Biol Evol. 1993 Jul;10(4):804–822. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hey J. Mitochondrial and nuclear genes present conflicting portraits of human origins. Mol Biol Evol. 1997 Feb;14(2):166–172. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025749. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hey J., Wakeley J. A coalescent estimator of the population recombination rate. Genetics. 1997 Mar;145(3):833–846. doi: 10.1093/genetics/145.3.833. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hilton H., Hey J. DNA sequence variation at the period locus reveals the history of species and speciation events in the Drosophila virilis group. Genetics. 1996 Nov;144(3):1015–1025. doi: 10.1093/genetics/144.3.1015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hudson R. R., Kaplan N. L. Statistical properties of the number of recombination events in the history of a sample of DNA sequences. Genetics. 1985 Sep;111(1):147–164. doi: 10.1093/genetics/111.1.147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hudson R. R., Kreitman M., Aguadé M. A test of neutral molecular evolution based on nucleotide data. Genetics. 1987 May;116(1):153–159. doi: 10.1093/genetics/116.1.153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Iltis H. H. From teosinte to maize: the catastrophic sexual transmutation. Science. 1983 Nov 25;222(4626):886–894. doi: 10.1126/science.222.4626.886. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Innan H., Tajima F., Terauchi R., Miyashita N. T. Intragenic recombination in the Adh locus of the wild plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Genetics. 1996 Aug;143(4):1761–1770. doi: 10.1093/genetics/143.4.1761. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kimura M. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol. 1980 Dec;16(2):111–120. doi: 10.1007/BF01731581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kliman R. M., Hey J. DNA sequence variation at the period locus within and among species of the Drosophila melanogaster complex. Genetics. 1993 Feb;133(2):375–387. doi: 10.1093/genetics/133.2.375. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kriz A. L. Characterization of embryo globulins encoded by the maize Glb genes. Biochem Genet. 1989 Apr;27(3-4):239–251. doi: 10.1007/BF02401804. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. McDonald J. H., Kreitman M. Adaptive protein evolution at the Adh locus in Drosophila. Nature. 1991 Jun 20;351(6328):652–654. doi: 10.1038/351652a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Miyashita N. T., Innan H., Terauchi R. Intra- and interspecific variation of the alcohol dehydrogenase locus region in wild plants Arabis gemmifera and Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol Biol Evol. 1996 Feb;13(2):433–436. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Moriyama E. N., Powell J. R. Intraspecific nuclear DNA variation in Drosophila. Mol Biol Evol. 1996 Jan;13(1):261–277. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025563. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Nei M., Gojobori T. Simple methods for estimating the numbers of synonymous and nonsynonymous nucleotide substitutions. Mol Biol Evol. 1986 Sep;3(5):418–426. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Saitou N., Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol. 1987 Jul;4(4):406–425. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Simonsen K. L., Churchill G. A., Aquadro C. F. Properties of statistical tests of neutrality for DNA polymorphism data. Genetics. 1995 Sep;141(1):413–429. doi: 10.1093/genetics/141.1.413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Smith J. M., Haigh J. The hitch-hiking effect of a favourable gene. Genet Res. 1974 Feb;23(1):23–35. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Tajima F. Evolutionary relationship of DNA sequences in finite populations. Genetics. 1983 Oct;105(2):437–460. doi: 10.1093/genetics/105.2.437. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Tajima F. Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism. Genetics. 1989 Nov;123(3):585–595. doi: 10.1093/genetics/123.3.585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Wakeley J., Hey J. Estimating ancestral population parameters. Genetics. 1997 Mar;145(3):847–855. doi: 10.1093/genetics/145.3.847. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Wang R. L., Hey J. The speciation history of Drosophila pseudoobscura and close relatives: inferences from DNA sequence variation at the period locus. Genetics. 1996 Nov;144(3):1113–1126. doi: 10.1093/genetics/144.3.1113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Wang R. L., Wakeley J., Hey J. Gene flow and natural selection in the origin of Drosophila pseudoobscura and close relatives. Genetics. 1997 Nov;147(3):1091–1106. doi: 10.1093/genetics/147.3.1091. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Zhang J., Kumar S., Nei M. Small-sample tests of episodic adaptive evolution: a case study of primate lysozymes. Mol Biol Evol. 1997 Dec;14(12):1335–1338. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025743. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES