Skip to main content
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1999 Mar;151(3):1123–1125. doi: 10.1093/genetics/151.3.1123

Genome reduction in a hemiclonal frog Rana esculenta from radioactively contaminated areas.

A E Vinogradov 1, A T Chubinishvili 1
PMCID: PMC1460525  PMID: 10049928

Abstract

A decrease in genome size was found in the hemiclonal hybridogenetic frog Rana esculenta (R. ridibunda x R. lessonae) from areas of radioactive contamination that resulted from the Chernobyl fallout. This genome reduction was of up to 4% and correlated with the background level of gamma-radiation (linear regression corresponded on average to -0.4% per doubling of radiation level). No change in genome size was observed in the coexisting parental species R. lessonae. There was no correlation between genome size and body mass in R. esculenta froglets, which have metamorphosed in the year of the study. The hemiclonal forms may become a suitable object for study on biological significance of individual DNA sequences (and of genome size as a whole) because mutant animals with deletions in a specified genome can arise after a low radiation dose. The proneness to genetic damage makes such forms also a prospective bioindicator of radioactive (and possibly other mutagenic) pollution with the effects of genetic damage conveniently and rapidly monitored by DNA flow cytometry.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (81.5 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Charlesworth B., Sniegowski P., Stephan W. The evolutionary dynamics of repetitive DNA in eukaryotes. Nature. 1994 Sep 15;371(6494):215–220. doi: 10.1038/371215a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Elder J. F., Jr, Turner B. J. Concerted evolution of repetitive DNA sequences in eukaryotes. Q Rev Biol. 1995 Sep;70(3):297–320. doi: 10.1086/419073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Leslie J. F., Vrijenhoek R. C. Genetic dissection of clonally inherited genomes of poeciliopsis. I. Linkage analysis and preliminary assessment of deleterious gene loads. Genetics. 1978 Dec;90(4):801–811. doi: 10.1093/genetics/90.4.801. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Morell V. Rise and fall of the Y chromosome. Science. 1994 Jan 14;263(5144):171–172. doi: 10.1126/science.8284667. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Pagel M., Johnstone R. A. Variation across species in the size of the nuclear genome supports the junk-DNA explanation for the C-value paradox. Proc Biol Sci. 1992 Aug 22;249(1325):119–124. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1992.0093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Quattro J. M., Avise J. C., Vrijenhoek R. C. Molecular evidence for multiple origins of hybridogenetic fish clones (Poeciliidae:Poeciliopsis). Genetics. 1991 Feb;127(2):391–398. doi: 10.1093/genetics/127.2.391. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Rice W. R. Degeneration of a nonrecombining chromosome. Science. 1994 Jan 14;263(5144):230–232. doi: 10.1126/science.8284674. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Tunner H. G., Heppich S. Premeiotic genome exclusion during oogenesis in the common edible frog, Rana esculenta. Naturwissenschaften. 1981 Apr;68(4):207–208. doi: 10.1007/BF01047207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Vinogradov A. E., Borkin L. J., Günther R., Rosanov J. M. Genome elimination in diploid and triploid Rana esculenta males: cytological evidence from DNA flow cytometry. Genome. 1990 Oct;33(5):619–627. doi: 10.1139/g90-092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Vinogradov A. E., Borkin L. J., Günther R., Rosanov J. M. Two germ cell lineages with genomes of different species in one and the same animal. Hereditas. 1991;114(3):245–251. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-5223.1991.tb00331.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Vinogradov A. E. Buffering: a possible passive-homeostasis role for redundant DNA. J Theor Biol. 1998 Jul 27;193(2):197–199. doi: 10.1006/jtbi.1997.0629. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Wu C. I., True J. R., Johnson N. Fitness reduction associated with the deletion of a satellite DNA array. Nature. 1989 Sep 21;341(6239):248–251. doi: 10.1038/341248a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES