Skip to main content
PMC home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1999 Jul;152(3):1079–1089. doi: 10.1093/genetics/152.3.1079

Estimation of past demographic parameters from the distribution of pairwise differences when the mutation rates vary among sites: application to human mitochondrial DNA.

S Schneider 1, L Excoffier 1
PMCID: PMC1460660  PMID: 10388826

Abstract

Distributions of pairwise differences often called "mismatch distributions" have been extensively used to estimate the demographic parameters of past population expansions. However, these estimations relied on the assumption that all mutations occurring in the ancestry of a pair of genes lead to observable differences (the infinite-sites model). This mutation model may not be very realistic, especially in the case of the control region of mitochondrial DNA, where this methodology has been mostly applied. In this article, we show how to infer past demographic parameters by explicitly taking into account a finite-sites model with heterogeneity of mutation rates. We also propose an alternative way to derive confidence intervals around the estimated parameters, based on a bootstrap approach. By checking the validity of these confidence intervals by simulations, we find that only those associated with the timing of the expansion are approximately correctly estimated, while those around the population sizes are overly large. We also propose a test of the validity of the estimated demographic expansion scenario, whose proper behavior is verified by simulation. We illustrate our method with human mitochondrial DNA, where estimates of expansion times are found to be 10-20% larger when taking into account heterogeneity of mutation rates than under the infinite-sites model.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (154.5 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Aris-Brosou S., Excoffier L. The impact of population expansion and mutation rate heterogeneity on DNA sequence polymorphism. Mol Biol Evol. 1996 Mar;13(3):494–504. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025610. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bertorelle G., Slatkin M. The number of segregating sites in expanding human populations, with implications for estimates of demographic parameters. Mol Biol Evol. 1995 Sep;12(5):887–892. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cornuet J. M., Luikart G. Description and power analysis of two tests for detecting recent population bottlenecks from allele frequency data. Genetics. 1996 Dec;144(4):2001–2014. doi: 10.1093/genetics/144.4.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Fu Y. X., Li W. H. Statistical tests of neutrality of mutations. Genetics. 1993 Mar;133(3):693–709. doi: 10.1093/genetics/133.3.693. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Fu Y. X. Statistical tests of neutrality of mutations against population growth, hitchhiking and background selection. Genetics. 1997 Oct;147(2):915–925. doi: 10.1093/genetics/147.2.915. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Graven L., Passarino G., Semino O., Boursot P., Santachiara-Benerecetti S., Langaney A., Excoffier L. Evolutionary correlation between control region sequence and restriction polymorphisms in the mitochondrial genome of a large Senegalese Mandenka sample. Mol Biol Evol. 1995 Mar;12(2):334–345. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Harpending H. C., Batzer M. A., Gurven M., Jorde L. B., Rogers A. R., Sherry S. T. Genetic traces of ancient demography. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Feb 17;95(4):1961–1967. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.4.1961. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hasegawa M., Di Rienzo A., Kocher T. D., Wilson A. C. Toward a more accurate time scale for the human mitochondrial DNA tree. J Mol Evol. 1993 Oct;37(4):347–354. doi: 10.1007/BF00178865. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Howell N., Kubacka I., Mackey D. A. How rapidly does the human mitochondrial genome evolve? Am J Hum Genet. 1996 Sep;59(3):501–509. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Jazin E., Soodyall H., Jalonen P., Lindholm E., Stoneking M., Gyllensten U. Mitochondrial mutation rate revisited: hot spots and polymorphism. Nat Genet. 1998 Feb;18(2):109–110. doi: 10.1038/ng0298-109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Jazin E., Soodyall H., Jalonen P., Lindholm E., Stoneking M., Gyllensten U. Mitochondrial mutation rate revisited: hot spots and polymorphism. Nat Genet. 1998 Feb;18(2):109–110. doi: 10.1038/ng0298-109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kimura M. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol. 1980 Dec;16(2):111–120. doi: 10.1007/BF01731581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kimura M. The number of heterozygous nucleotide sites maintained in a finite population due to steady flux of mutations. Genetics. 1969 Apr;61(4):893–903. doi: 10.1093/genetics/61.4.893. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kolman C. J., Bermingham E., Cooke R., Ward R. H., Arias T. D., Guionneau-Sinclair F. Reduced mtDNA diversity in the Ngöbé Amerinds of Panamá. Genetics. 1995 May;140(1):275–283. doi: 10.1093/genetics/140.1.275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kuhner M. K., Yamato J., Felsenstein J. Estimating effective population size and mutation rate from sequence data using Metropolis-Hastings sampling. Genetics. 1995 Aug;140(4):1421–1430. doi: 10.1093/genetics/140.4.1421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kuhner M. K., Yamato J., Felsenstein J. Maximum likelihood estimation of population growth rates based on the coalescent. Genetics. 1998 May;149(1):429–434. doi: 10.1093/genetics/149.1.429. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Lundstrom R., Tavaré S., Ward R. H. Modeling the evolution of the human mitochondrial genome. Math Biosci. 1992 Dec;112(2):319–335. doi: 10.1016/0025-5564(92)90030-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Meyer S., Weiss G., von Haeseler A. Pattern of nucleotide substitution and rate heterogeneity in the hypervariable regions I and II of human mtDNA. Genetics. 1999 Jul;152(3):1103–1110. doi: 10.1093/genetics/152.3.1103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Parsons T. J., Muniec D. S., Sullivan K., Woodyatt N., Alliston-Greiner R., Wilson M. R., Berry D. L., Holland K. A., Weedn V. W., Gill P. A high observed substitution rate in the human mitochondrial DNA control region. Nat Genet. 1997 Apr;15(4):363–368. doi: 10.1038/ng0497-363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Piercy R., Sullivan K. M., Benson N., Gill P. The application of mitochondrial DNA typing to the study of white Caucasian genetic identification. Int J Legal Med. 1993;106(2):85–90. doi: 10.1007/BF01225046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Polanski A., Kimmel M., Chakraborty R. Application of a time-dependent coalescence process for inferring the history of population size changes from DNA sequence data. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 May 12;95(10):5456–5461. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.10.5456. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Rogers A. R., Fraley A. E., Bamshad M. J., Watkins W. S., Jorde L. B. Mitochondrial mismatch analysis is insensitive to the mutational process. Mol Biol Evol. 1996 Sep;13(7):895–902. doi: 10.1093/molbev/13.7.895. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Rogers A. R., Harpending H. Population growth makes waves in the distribution of pairwise genetic differences. Mol Biol Evol. 1992 May;9(3):552–569. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040727. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Rogers A. Error introduced by the infinite-site model. Mol Biol Evol. 1992 Nov;9(6):1181–1184. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040787. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Tajima F. The amount of DNA polymorphism maintained in a finite population when the neutral mutation rate varies among sites. Genetics. 1996 Jul;143(3):1457–1465. doi: 10.1093/genetics/143.3.1457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Tavaré S., Balding D. J., Griffiths R. C., Donnelly P. Inferring coalescence times from DNA sequence data. Genetics. 1997 Feb;145(2):505–518. doi: 10.1093/genetics/145.2.505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Vigilant L., Stoneking M., Harpending H., Hawkes K., Wilson A. C. African populations and the evolution of human mitochondrial DNA. Science. 1991 Sep 27;253(5027):1503–1507. doi: 10.1126/science.1840702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Wakeley J., Hey J. Estimating ancestral population parameters. Genetics. 1997 Mar;145(3):847–855. doi: 10.1093/genetics/145.3.847. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Watson E., Bauer K., Aman R., Weiss G., von Haeseler A., Päbo S. mtDNA sequence diversity in Africa. Am J Hum Genet. 1996 Aug;59(2):437–444. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Watterson G. A. On the number of segregating sites in genetical models without recombination. Theor Popul Biol. 1975 Apr;7(2):256–276. doi: 10.1016/0040-5809(75)90020-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Weiss G., von Haeseler A. Inference of population history using a likelihood approach. Genetics. 1998 Jul;149(3):1539–1546. doi: 10.1093/genetics/149.3.1539. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Yang Z., Kumar S., Nei M. A new method of inference of ancestral nucleotide and amino acid sequences. Genetics. 1995 Dec;141(4):1641–1650. doi: 10.1093/genetics/141.4.1641. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Yang Z. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic estimation from DNA sequences with variable rates over sites: approximate methods. J Mol Evol. 1994 Sep;39(3):306–314. doi: 10.1007/BF00160154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES