Skip to main content
PMC home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1999 Dec;153(4):1717–1729. doi: 10.1093/genetics/153.4.1717

Large number of replacement polymorphisms in rapidly evolving genes of Drosophila. Implications for genome-wide surveys of DNA polymorphism.

K J Schmid 1, L Nigro 1, C F Aquadro 1, D Tautz 1
PMCID: PMC1460855  PMID: 10581279

Abstract

We present a survey of nucleotide polymorphism of three novel, rapidly evolving genes in populations of Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans. Levels of silent polymorphism are comparable to other loci, but the number of replacement polymorphisms is higher than that in most other genes surveyed in D. melanogaster and D. simulans. Tests of neutrality fail to reject neutral evolution with one exception. This concerns a gene located in a region of high recombination rate in D. simulans and in a region of low recombination rate in D. melanogaster, due to an inversion. In the latter case it shows a very low number of polymorphisms, presumably due to selective sweeps in the region. Patterns of nucleotide polymorphism suggest that most substitutions are neutral or nearly neutral and that weak (positive and purifying) selection plays a significant role in the evolution of these genes. At all three loci, purifying selection of slightly deleterious replacement mutations appears to be more efficient in D. simulans than in D. melanogaster, presumably due to different effective population sizes. Our analysis suggests that current knowledge about genome-wide patterns of nucleotide polymorphism is far from complete with respect to the types and range of nucleotide substitutions and that further analysis of differences between local populations will be required to understand the forces more completely. We note that rapidly diverging and nearly neutrally evolving genes cannot be expected only in the genome of Drosophila, but are likely to occur in large numbers also in other organisms and that their function and evolution are little understood so far.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (189.8 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Aguadé M. Different forces drive the evolution of the Acp26Aa and Acp26Ab accessory gland genes in the Drosophila melanogaster species complex. Genetics. 1998 Nov;150(3):1079–1089. doi: 10.1093/genetics/150.3.1079. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Aguadé M., Miyashita N., Langley C. H. Polymorphism and divergence in the Mst26A male accessory gland gene region in Drosophila. Genetics. 1992 Nov;132(3):755–770. doi: 10.1093/genetics/132.3.755. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Akashi H. Codon bias evolution in Drosophila. Population genetics of mutation-selection drift. Gene. 1997 Dec 31;205(1-2):269–278. doi: 10.1016/s0378-1119(97)00400-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Akashi H. Inferring the fitness effects of DNA mutations from polymorphism and divergence data: statistical power to detect directional selection under stationarity and free recombination. Genetics. 1999 Jan;151(1):221–238. doi: 10.1093/genetics/151.1.221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Akashi H. Inferring weak selection from patterns of polymorphism and divergence at "silent" sites in Drosophila DNA. Genetics. 1995 Feb;139(2):1067–1076. doi: 10.1093/genetics/139.2.1067. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Akashi H. Molecular evolution between Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans: reduced codon bias, faster rates of amino acid substitution, and larger proteins in D. melanogaster. Genetics. 1996 Nov;144(3):1297–1307. doi: 10.1093/genetics/144.3.1297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Akashi H., Schaeffer S. W. Natural selection and the frequency distributions of "silent" DNA polymorphism in Drosophila. Genetics. 1997 May;146(1):295–307. doi: 10.1093/genetics/146.1.295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Aquadro C. F., Lado K. M., Noon W. A. The rosy region of Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans. I. Contrasting levels of naturally occurring DNA restriction map variation and divergence. Genetics. 1988 Aug;119(4):875–888. doi: 10.1093/genetics/119.4.875. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Aquadro C. F. Why is the genome variable? Insights from Drosophila. Trends Genet. 1992 Oct;8(10):355–362. doi: 10.1016/0168-9525(92)90281-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Begun D. J., Aquadro C. F. African and North American populations of Drosophila melanogaster are very different at the DNA level. Nature. 1993 Oct 7;365(6446):548–550. doi: 10.1038/365548a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Begun D. J., Aquadro C. F. Levels of naturally occurring DNA polymorphism correlate with recombination rates in D. melanogaster. Nature. 1992 Apr 9;356(6369):519–520. doi: 10.1038/356519a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Begun D. J., Aquadro C. F. Molecular population genetics of the distal portion of the X chromosome in Drosophila: evidence for genetic hitchhiking of the yellow-achaete region. Genetics. 1991 Dec;129(4):1147–1158. doi: 10.1093/genetics/129.4.1147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Berry A. J., Ajioka J. W., Kreitman M. Lack of polymorphism on the Drosophila fourth chromosome resulting from selection. Genetics. 1991 Dec;129(4):1111–1117. doi: 10.1093/genetics/129.4.1111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Bevan M., Bancroft I., Bent E., Love K., Goodman H., Dean C., Bergkamp R., Dirkse W., Van Staveren M., Stiekema W. Analysis of 1.9 Mb of contiguous sequence from chromosome 4 of Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature. 1998 Jan 29;391(6666):485–488. doi: 10.1038/35140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. C. elegans Sequencing Consortium Genome sequence of the nematode C. elegans: a platform for investigating biology. Science. 1998 Dec 11;282(5396):2012–2018. doi: 10.1126/science.282.5396.2012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Charlesworth B., Morgan M. T., Charlesworth D. The effect of deleterious mutations on neutral molecular variation. Genetics. 1993 Aug;134(4):1289–1303. doi: 10.1093/genetics/134.4.1289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Charlesworth D., Charlesworth B., Morgan M. T. The pattern of neutral molecular variation under the background selection model. Genetics. 1995 Dec;141(4):1619–1632. doi: 10.1093/genetics/141.4.1619. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Comeron J. M. A method for estimating the numbers of synonymous and nonsynonymous substitutions per site. J Mol Evol. 1995 Dec;41(6):1152–1159. doi: 10.1007/BF00173196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Eanes W. F., Kirchner M., Yoon J., Biermann C. H., Wang I. N., McCartney M. A., Verrelli B. C. Historical selection, amino acid polymorphism and lineage-specific divergence at the G6pd locus in Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans. Genetics. 1996 Nov;144(3):1027–1041. doi: 10.1093/genetics/144.3.1027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Goffeau A., Barrell B. G., Bussey H., Davis R. W., Dujon B., Feldmann H., Galibert F., Hoheisel J. D., Jacq C., Johnston M. Life with 6000 genes. Science. 1996 Oct 25;274(5287):546, 563-7. doi: 10.1126/science.274.5287.546. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Hamblin M. T., Aquadro C. F. Contrasting patterns of nucleotide sequence variation at the glucose dehydrogenase (Gld) locus in different populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1997 Apr;145(4):1053–1062. doi: 10.1093/genetics/145.4.1053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Hamblin M. T., Veuille M. Population structure among African and derived populations of Drosophila simulans: evidence for ancient subdivision and recent admixture. Genetics. 1999 Sep;153(1):305–317. doi: 10.1093/genetics/153.1.305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Hasson E., Wang I. N., Zeng L. W., Kreitman M., Eanes W. F. Nucleotide variation in the triosephosphate isomerase (Tpi) locus of Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans. Mol Biol Evol. 1998 Jun;15(6):756–769. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025979. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Hudson R. R., Kaplan N. L. Deleterious background selection with recombination. Genetics. 1995 Dec;141(4):1605–1617. doi: 10.1093/genetics/141.4.1605. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Hudson R. R., Kreitman M., Aguadé M. A test of neutral molecular evolution based on nucleotide data. Genetics. 1987 May;116(1):153–159. doi: 10.1093/genetics/116.1.153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Hughes A. L., Ota T., Nei M. Positive Darwinian selection promotes charge profile diversity in the antigen-binding cleft of class I major-histocompatibility-complex molecules. Mol Biol Evol. 1990 Nov;7(6):515–524. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040626. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Kirby D. A., Stephan W. Multi-locus selection and the structure of variation at the white gene of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1996 Oct;144(2):635–645. doi: 10.1093/genetics/144.2.635. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Kreitman M., Hudson R. R. Inferring the evolutionary histories of the Adh and Adh-dup loci in Drosophila melanogaster from patterns of polymorphism and divergence. Genetics. 1991 Mar;127(3):565–582. doi: 10.1093/genetics/127.3.565. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Kreitman M. The neutral theory is dead. Long live the neutral theory. Bioessays. 1996 Aug;18(8):678–683. doi: 10.1002/bies.950180812. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Langley C. H., MacDonald J., Miyashita N., Aguadé M. Lack of correlation between interspecific divergence and intraspecific polymorphism at the suppressor of forked region in Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Mar 1;90(5):1800–1803. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.5.1800. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Martin C. H., Meyerowitz E. M. Characterization of the boundaries between adjacent rapidly and slowly evolving genomic regions in Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 Nov;83(22):8654–8658. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.22.8654. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. McDonald J. H. Improved tests for heterogeneity across a region of DNA sequence in the ratio of polymorphism to divergence. Mol Biol Evol. 1998 Apr;15(4):377–384. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025934. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. McDonald J. H., Kreitman M. Adaptive protein evolution at the Adh locus in Drosophila. Nature. 1991 Jun 20;351(6328):652–654. doi: 10.1038/351652a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Metz E. C., Palumbi S. R. Positive selection and sequence rearrangements generate extensive polymorphism in the gamete recognition protein bindin. Mol Biol Evol. 1996 Feb;13(2):397–406. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025598. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Moriyama E. N., Powell J. R. Intraspecific nuclear DNA variation in Drosophila. Mol Biol Evol. 1996 Jan;13(1):261–277. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025563. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Muse S. V., Gaut B. S. A likelihood approach for comparing synonymous and nonsynonymous nucleotide substitution rates, with application to the chloroplast genome. Mol Biol Evol. 1994 Sep;11(5):715–724. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Ohta T. The current significance and standing of neutral and neutral theories. Bioessays. 1996 Aug;18(8):673–683. doi: 10.1002/bies.950180811. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Ohta T, Gillespie JH. Development of Neutral and Nearly Neutral Theories. Theor Popul Biol. 1996 Apr;49(2):128–142. doi: 10.1006/tpbi.1996.0007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Rozas J., Rozas R. DnaSP version 3: an integrated program for molecular population genetics and molecular evolution analysis. Bioinformatics. 1999 Feb;15(2):174–175. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/15.2.174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Schlötterer C., Vogl C., Tautz D. Polymorphism and locus-specific effects on polymorphism at microsatellite loci in natural Drosophila melanogaster populations. Genetics. 1997 May;146(1):309–320. doi: 10.1093/genetics/146.1.309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Schmid K. J., Tautz D. A screen for fast evolving genes from Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Sep 2;94(18):9746–9750. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.18.9746. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Simonsen K. L., Churchill G. A., Aquadro C. F. Properties of statistical tests of neutrality for DNA polymorphism data. Genetics. 1995 Sep;141(1):413–429. doi: 10.1093/genetics/141.1.413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Smith J. M., Haigh J. The hitch-hiking effect of a favourable gene. Genet Res. 1974 Feb;23(1):23–35. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Smith N. H., Maynard Smith J., Spratt B. G. Sequence evolution of the porB gene of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Neisseria meningitidis: evidence of positive Darwinian selection. Mol Biol Evol. 1995 May;12(3):363–370. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Spelt C., Quattrocchio F., Mol J. N., Koes R. anthocyanin1 of petunia encodes a basic helix-loop-helix protein that directly activates transcription of structural anthocyanin genes. Plant Cell. 2000 Sep;12(9):1619–1632. doi: 10.1105/tpc.12.9.1619. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Sutton K. A., Wilkinson M. F. Rapid evolution of a homeodomain: evidence for positive selection. J Mol Evol. 1997 Dec;45(6):579–588. doi: 10.1007/pl00006262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Tajima F. Simple methods for testing the molecular evolutionary clock hypothesis. Genetics. 1993 Oct;135(2):599–607. doi: 10.1093/genetics/135.2.599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Tajima F. Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism. Genetics. 1989 Nov;123(3):585–595. doi: 10.1093/genetics/123.3.585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Tang H., Lewontin R. C. Locating regions of differential variability in DNA and protein sequences. Genetics. 1999 Sep;153(1):485–495. doi: 10.1093/genetics/153.1.485. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Tautz D., Nigro L. Microevolutionary divergence pattern of the segmentation gene hunchback in Drosophila. Mol Biol Evol. 1998 Nov;15(11):1403–1411. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025868. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Tautz D., Schmid K. J. From genes to individuals: developmental genes and the generation of the phenotype. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1998 Feb 28;353(1366):231–240. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1998.0205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Tsaur S. C., Ting C. T., Wu C. I. Positive selection driving the evolution of a gene of male reproduction, Acp26Aa, of Drosophila: II. Divergence versus polymorphism. Mol Biol Evol. 1998 Aug;15(8):1040–1046. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Tsaur S. C., Ting C. T., Wu C. I. Positive selection driving the evolution of a gene of male reproduction, Acp26Aa, of Drosophila: II. Divergence versus polymorphism. Mol Biol Evol. 1998 Aug;15(8):1040–1046. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Wayne M. L., Contamine D., Kreitman M. Molecular population genetics of ref(2)P, a locus which confers viral resistance in Drosophila. Mol Biol Evol. 1996 Jan;13(1):191–199. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025555. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Wayne M. L., Kreitman M. Reduced variation at concertina, a heterochromatic locus in Drosophila. Genet Res. 1996 Oct;68(2):101–108. doi: 10.1017/s001667230003398x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Werman S. D., Davidson E. H., Britten R. J. Rapid evolution in a fraction of the Drosophila nuclear genome. J Mol Evol. 1990 Mar;30(3):281–289. doi: 10.1007/BF02099998. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Whitfield L. S., Lovell-Badge R., Goodfellow P. N. Rapid sequence evolution of the mammalian sex-determining gene SRY. Nature. 1993 Aug 19;364(6439):713–715. doi: 10.1038/364713a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES