Skip to main content
PMC home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 2000 Jul;155(3):1405–1413. doi: 10.1093/genetics/155.3.1405

Hitchhiking under positive Darwinian selection.

J C Fay 1, C I Wu 1
PMCID: PMC1461156  PMID: 10880498

Abstract

Positive selection can be inferred from its effect on linked neutral variation. In the restrictive case when there is no recombination, all linked variation is removed. If recombination is present but rare, both deterministic and stochastic models of positive selection show that linked variation hitchhikes to either low or high frequencies. While the frequency distribution of variation can be influenced by a number of evolutionary processes, an excess of derived variants at high frequency is a unique pattern produced by hitchhiking (derived refers to the nonancestral state as determined from an outgroup). We adopt a statistic, H, to measure an excess of high compared to intermediate frequency variants. Only a few high-frequency variants are needed to detect hitchhiking since not many are expected under neutrality. This is of particular utility in regions of low recombination where there is not much variation and in regions of normal or high recombination, where the hitchhiking effect can be limited to a small (<1 kb) region. Application of the H test to published surveys of Drosophila variation reveals an excess of high frequency variants that are likely to have been influenced by positive selection.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (138.0 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Aguade M., Miyashita N., Langley C. H. Reduced variation in the yellow-achaete-scute region in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1989 Jul;122(3):607–615. doi: 10.1093/genetics/122.3.607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Aguadé M. Different forces drive the evolution of the Acp26Aa and Acp26Ab accessory gland genes in the Drosophila melanogaster species complex. Genetics. 1998 Nov;150(3):1079–1089. doi: 10.1093/genetics/150.3.1079. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Aguadé M., Miyashita N., Langley C. H. Polymorphism and divergence in the Mst26A male accessory gland gene region in Drosophila. Genetics. 1992 Nov;132(3):755–770. doi: 10.1093/genetics/132.3.755. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Begun D. J., Aquadro C. F. Evolution at the tip and base of the X chromosome in an African population of Drosophila melanogaster. Mol Biol Evol. 1995 May;12(3):382–390. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Begun D. J., Aquadro C. F. Evolutionary inferences from DNA variation at the 6-phosphogluconate dehydrogenase locus in natural populations of drosophila: selection and geographic differentiation. Genetics. 1994 Jan;136(1):155–171. doi: 10.1093/genetics/136.1.155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Begun D. J., Aquadro C. F. Levels of naturally occurring DNA polymorphism correlate with recombination rates in D. melanogaster. Nature. 1992 Apr 9;356(6369):519–520. doi: 10.1038/356519a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Braverman J. M., Hudson R. R., Kaplan N. L., Langley C. H., Stephan W. The hitchhiking effect on the site frequency spectrum of DNA polymorphisms. Genetics. 1995 Jun;140(2):783–796. doi: 10.1093/genetics/140.2.783. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Broman K. W., Murray J. C., Sheffield V. C., White R. L., Weber J. L. Comprehensive human genetic maps: individual and sex-specific variation in recombination. Am J Hum Genet. 1998 Sep;63(3):861–869. doi: 10.1086/302011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Charlesworth B. Measures of divergence between populations and the effect of forces that reduce variability. Mol Biol Evol. 1998 May;15(5):538–543. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025953. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Charlesworth B., Morgan M. T., Charlesworth D. The effect of deleterious mutations on neutral molecular variation. Genetics. 1993 Aug;134(4):1289–1303. doi: 10.1093/genetics/134.4.1289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Charlesworth D., Charlesworth B., Morgan M. T. The pattern of neutral molecular variation under the background selection model. Genetics. 1995 Dec;141(4):1619–1632. doi: 10.1093/genetics/141.4.1619. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Comeron J. M., Kreitman M., Aguadé M. Natural selection on synonymous sites is correlated with gene length and recombination in Drosophila. Genetics. 1999 Jan;151(1):239–249. doi: 10.1093/genetics/151.1.239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Fay J. C., Wu C. I. A human population bottleneck can account for the discordance between patterns of mitochondrial versus nuclear DNA variation. Mol Biol Evol. 1999 Jul;16(7):1003–1005. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Fu Y. X. Statistical properties of segregating sites. Theor Popul Biol. 1995 Oct;48(2):172–197. doi: 10.1006/tpbi.1995.1025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Fu Y. X. Statistical tests of neutrality of mutations against population growth, hitchhiking and background selection. Genetics. 1997 Oct;147(2):915–925. doi: 10.1093/genetics/147.2.915. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Grote M. N., Klitz W., Thomson G. Constrained disequilibrium values and hitchhiking in a three-locus system. Genetics. 1998 Nov;150(3):1295–1307. doi: 10.1093/genetics/150.3.1295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hamblin M. T., Aquadro C. F. Contrasting patterns of nucleotide sequence variation at the glucose dehydrogenase (Gld) locus in different populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1997 Apr;145(4):1053–1062. doi: 10.1093/genetics/145.4.1053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Hudson R. R., Kreitman M., Aguadé M. A test of neutral molecular evolution based on nucleotide data. Genetics. 1987 May;116(1):153–159. doi: 10.1093/genetics/116.1.153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Hudson R. R. Properties of a neutral allele model with intragenic recombination. Theor Popul Biol. 1983 Apr;23(2):183–201. doi: 10.1016/0040-5809(83)90013-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Jenkins D. L., Ortori C. A., Brookfield J. F. A test for adaptive change in DNA sequences controlling transcription. Proc Biol Sci. 1995 Aug 22;261(1361):203–207. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1995.0137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Langley C. H., MacDonald J., Miyashita N., Aguadé M. Lack of correlation between interspecific divergence and intraspecific polymorphism at the suppressor of forked region in Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Mar 1;90(5):1800–1803. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.5.1800. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Martín-Campos J. M., Comerón J. M., Miyashita N., Aguadé M. Intraspecific and interspecific variation at the y-ac-sc region of Drosophila simulans and Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1992 Apr;130(4):805–816. doi: 10.1093/genetics/130.4.805. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. McDonald J. H. Improved tests for heterogeneity across a region of DNA sequence in the ratio of polymorphism to divergence. Mol Biol Evol. 1998 Apr;15(4):377–384. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025934. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. McDonald J. H., Kreitman M. Adaptive protein evolution at the Adh locus in Drosophila. Nature. 1991 Jun 20;351(6328):652–654. doi: 10.1038/351652a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Moriyama E. N., Powell J. R. Intraspecific nuclear DNA variation in Drosophila. Mol Biol Evol. 1996 Jan;13(1):261–277. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025563. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Nachman M. W., Bauer V. L., Crowell S. L., Aquadro C. F. DNA variability and recombination rates at X-linked loci in humans. Genetics. 1998 Nov;150(3):1133–1141. doi: 10.1093/genetics/150.3.1133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Rozas J., Rozas R. DnaSP version 3: an integrated program for molecular population genetics and molecular evolution analysis. Bioinformatics. 1999 Feb;15(2):174–175. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/15.2.174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Santiago E., Caballero A. Effective size and polymorphism of linked neutral loci in populations under directional selection. Genetics. 1998 Aug;149(4):2105–2117. doi: 10.1093/genetics/149.4.2105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Simonsen K. L., Churchill G. A., Aquadro C. F. Properties of statistical tests of neutrality for DNA polymorphism data. Genetics. 1995 Sep;141(1):413–429. doi: 10.1093/genetics/141.1.413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Slatkin M., Wiehe T. Genetic hitch-hiking in a subdivided population. Genet Res. 1998 Apr;71(2):155–160. doi: 10.1017/s001667239800319x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Stephan W., Langley C. H. Molecular genetic variation in the centromeric region of the X chromosome in three Drosophila ananassae populations. I. Contrasts between the vermilion and forked loci. Genetics. 1989 Jan;121(1):89–99. doi: 10.1093/genetics/121.1.89. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Stephan W. Molecular genetic variation in the centromeric region of the X chromosome in three Drosophila ananassae populations. II. The Om(1D) locus. Mol Biol Evol. 1989 Nov;6(6):624–635. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040580. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Stephan W., Xing L., Kirby D. A., Braverman J. M. A test of the background selection hypothesis based on nucleotide data from Drosophila ananassae. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 May 12;95(10):5649–5654. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.10.5649. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Tajima F. Evolutionary relationship of DNA sequences in finite populations. Genetics. 1983 Oct;105(2):437–460. doi: 10.1093/genetics/105.2.437. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Tajima F. Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism. Genetics. 1989 Nov;123(3):585–595. doi: 10.1093/genetics/123.3.585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Thomson G. The effect of a selected locus on linked neutral loci. Genetics. 1977 Apr;85(4):753–788. doi: 10.1093/genetics/85.4.753. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Tsaur S. C., Ting C. T., Wu C. I. Positive selection driving the evolution of a gene of male reproduction, Acp26Aa, of Drosophila: II. Divergence versus polymorphism. Mol Biol Evol. 1998 Aug;15(8):1040–1046. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Tsaur S. C., Wu C. I. Positive selection and the molecular evolution of a gene of male reproduction, Acp26Aa of Drosophila. Mol Biol Evol. 1997 May;14(5):544–549. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025791. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Watterson G. A. On the number of segregating sites in genetical models without recombination. Theor Popul Biol. 1975 Apr;7(2):256–276. doi: 10.1016/0040-5809(75)90020-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES