Skip to main content
PMC home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 2001 Jan;157(1):225–236. doi: 10.1093/genetics/157.1.225

The Drosophila genes disconnected and disco-related are redundant with respect to larval head development and accumulation of mRNAs from deformed target genes.

J W Mahaffey 1, C M Griswold 1, Q M Cao 1
PMCID: PMC1461496  PMID: 11139504

Abstract

HOM-C/hox genes specify body pattern by encoding regionally expressed transcription factors that activate the appropriate target genes necessary for differentiation of each body region. The current model of target gene activation suggests that interactions with cofactors influence DNA-binding ability and target gene activation by the HOM-C/hox proteins. Currently, little is known about the specifics of this process because few target genes and fewer cofactors have been identified. We undertook a deficiency screen in Drosophila melanogaster in an attempt to identify loci potentially encoding cofactors for the protein encoded by the HOM-C gene Deformed (Dfd). We identified a region of the X chromosome that, when absent, leads to loss of specific larval mouthpart structures producing a phenotype similar to that observed in Dfd mutants. The phenotype is correlated with reduced accumulation of mRNAs from Dfd target genes, though there appears to be no effect on Dfd protein accumulation. We show that these defects are due to the loss of two functionally redundant, neighboring genes encoding zinc finger transcription factors, disconnected and a gene we call disco-related. We discuss the role of these genes during differentiation of the gnathal segments and, in light of other recent findings, propose that regionally expressed zinc finger proteins may play a central role with the HOM-C proteins in establishing body pattern.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (492.9 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adams M. D., Celniker S. E., Holt R. A., Evans C. A., Gocayne J. D., Amanatides P. G., Scherer S. E., Li P. W., Hoskins R. A., Galle R. F. The genome sequence of Drosophila melanogaster. Science. 2000 Mar 24;287(5461):2185–2195. doi: 10.1126/science.287.5461.2185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Affolter M., Percival-Smith A., Müller M., Leupin W., Gehring W. J. DNA binding properties of the purified Antennapedia homeodomain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 Jun;87(11):4093–4097. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.11.4093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Andrew D. J., Scott M. P. Downstream of the homeotic genes. New Biol. 1992 Jan;4(1):5–15. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Brown S. J., Mahaffey J. P., Lorenzen M. D., Denell R. E., Mahaffey J. W. Using RNAi to investigate orthologous homeotic gene function during development of distantly related insects. Evol Dev. 1999 Jul-Aug;1(1):11–15. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-142x.1999.99013.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chan S. K., Jaffe L., Capovilla M., Botas J., Mann R. S. The DNA binding specificity of Ultrabithorax is modulated by cooperative interactions with extradenticle, another homeoprotein. Cell. 1994 Aug 26;78(4):603–615. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90525-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Chan S. K., Mann R. S. A structural model for a homeotic protein-extradenticle-DNA complex accounts for the choice of HOX protein in the heterodimer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 May 28;93(11):5223–5228. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.11.5223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chan S. K., Ryoo H. D., Gould A., Krumlauf R., Mann R. S. Switching the in vivo specificity of a minimal Hox-responsive element. Development. 1997 May;124(10):2007–2014. doi: 10.1242/dev.124.10.2007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cohen B., Wimmer E. A., Cohen S. M. Early development of leg and wing primordia in the Drosophila embryo. Mech Dev. 1991 Mar;33(3):229–240. doi: 10.1016/0925-4773(91)90030-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Dessain S., Gross C. T., Kuziora M. A., McGinnis W. Antp-type homeodomains have distinct DNA binding specificities that correlate with their different regulatory functions in embryos. EMBO J. 1992 Mar;11(3):991–1002. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1992.tb05138.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ekker S. C., Jackson D. G., von Kessler D. P., Sun B. I., Young K. E., Beachy P. A. The degree of variation in DNA sequence recognition among four Drosophila homeotic proteins. EMBO J. 1994 Aug 1;13(15):3551–3560. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06662.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Falk D. R., Roselli L., Curtiss S., Halladay D., Klufas C. The characterization of chromosome breaks in Drosophila melanogaster. I. Mass isolation of deficiencies which have an end point in the 14A-15A region. Mutat Res. 1984 Mar;126(1):25–34. doi: 10.1016/0027-5107(84)90166-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Florence B., Handrow R., Laughon A. DNA-binding specificity of the fushi tarazu homeodomain. Mol Cell Biol. 1991 Jul;11(7):3613–3623. doi: 10.1128/mcb.11.7.3613. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Gallitano-Mendel A., Finkelstein R. Ectopic orthodenticle expression alters segment polarity gene expression but not head segment identity in the Drosophila embryo. Dev Biol. 1998 Jul 1;199(1):125–137. doi: 10.1006/dbio.1998.8917. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Gloor G. B., Preston C. R., Johnson-Schlitz D. M., Nassif N. A., Phillis R. W., Benz W. K., Robertson H. M., Engels W. R. Type I repressors of P element mobility. Genetics. 1993 Sep;135(1):81–95. doi: 10.1093/genetics/135.1.81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Goto T., Nishi T., Tamura T., Dev S. B., Takeshima H., Kochi M., Yoshizato K., Kuratsu J., Sakata T., Hofmann G. A. Highly efficient electro-gene therapy of solid tumor by using an expression plasmid for the herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Jan 4;97(1):354–359. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.1.354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Heilig J. S., Freeman M., Laverty T., Lee K. J., Campos A. R., Rubin G. M., Steller H. Isolation and characterization of the disconnected gene of Drosophila melanogaster. EMBO J. 1991 Apr;10(4):809–815. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1991.tb08013.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hoey T., Levine M. Divergent homeo box proteins recognize similar DNA sequences in Drosophila. Nature. 1988 Apr 28;332(6167):858–861. doi: 10.1038/332858a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kuziora M. A., McGinnis W. Autoregulation of a Drosophila homeotic selector gene. Cell. 1988 Nov 4;55(3):477–485. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90034-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Lewis E. B. A gene complex controlling segmentation in Drosophila. Nature. 1978 Dec 7;276(5688):565–570. doi: 10.1038/276565a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Li X., Veraksa A., McGinnis W. A sequence motif distinct from Hox binding sites controls the specificity of a Hox response element. Development. 1999 Dec;126(24):5581–5589. doi: 10.1242/dev.126.24.5581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Macías A., Morata G. Functional hierarchy and phenotypic suppression among Drosophila homeotic genes: the labial and empty spiracles genes. EMBO J. 1996 Jan 15;15(2):334–343. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Mahaffey J. W., Diederich R. J., Kaufman T. C. Novel patterns of homeotic protein accumulation in the head of the Drosophila embryo. Development. 1989 Jan;105(1):167–174. doi: 10.1242/dev.105.1.167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Mahaffey J. W., Jones D. F., Hickel J. A., Griswold C. M. Identification and characterization of a gene activated by the deformed homeoprotein. Development. 1993 May;118(1):203–214. doi: 10.1242/dev.118.1.203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Manak J. R., Scott M. P. A class act: conservation of homeodomain protein functions. Dev Suppl. 1994:61–77. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Mann R. S., Chan S. K. Extra specificity from extradenticle: the partnership between HOX and PBX/EXD homeodomain proteins. Trends Genet. 1996 Jul;12(7):258–262. doi: 10.1016/0168-9525(96)10026-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. McGinnis W., Krumlauf R. Homeobox genes and axial patterning. Cell. 1992 Jan 24;68(2):283–302. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90471-n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Merrill V. K., Diederich R. J., Turner F. R., Kaufman T. C. A genetic and developmental analysis of mutations in labial, a gene necessary for proper head formation in Drosophila melanogaster. Dev Biol. 1989 Oct;135(2):376–391. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(89)90187-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Merrill V. K., Turner F. R., Kaufman T. C. A genetic and developmental analysis of mutations in the Deformed locus in Drosophila melanogaster. Dev Biol. 1987 Aug;122(2):379–395. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(87)90303-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Misquitta L., Paterson B. M. Targeted disruption of gene function in Drosophila by RNA interference (RNA-i): a role for nautilus in embryonic somatic muscle formation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Feb 16;96(4):1451–1456. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.4.1451. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Mohler J., Eldon E. D., Pirrotta V. A novel spatial transcription pattern associated with the segmentation gene, giant, of Drosophila. EMBO J. 1989 May;8(5):1539–1548. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1989.tb03538.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Pavlidis P., Ramaswami M., Tanouye M. A. The Drosophila easily shocked gene: a mutation in a phospholipid synthetic pathway causes seizure, neuronal failure, and paralysis. Cell. 1994 Oct 7;79(1):23–33. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90397-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Pederson J. A., LaFollette J. W., Gross C., Veraksa A., McGinnis W., Mahaffey J. W. Regulation by homeoproteins: a comparison of deformed-responsive elements. Genetics. 2000 Oct;156(2):677–686. doi: 10.1093/genetics/156.2.677. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Pederson J. D., Kiehart D. P., Mahaffey J. W. The role of HOM-C genes in segmental transformations: reexamination of the Drosophila Sex combs reduced embryonic phenotype. Dev Biol. 1996 Nov 25;180(1):131–142. doi: 10.1006/dbio.1996.0290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Peifer M., Wieschaus E. Mutations in the Drosophila gene extradenticle affect the way specific homeo domain proteins regulate segmental identity. Genes Dev. 1990 Jul;4(7):1209–1223. doi: 10.1101/gad.4.7.1209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Pinsonneault J., Florence B., Vaessin H., McGinnis W. A model for extradenticle function as a switch that changes HOX proteins from repressors to activators. EMBO J. 1997 Apr 15;16(8):2032–2042. doi: 10.1093/emboj/16.8.2032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Rauskolb C., Peifer M., Wieschaus E. extradenticle, a regulator of homeotic gene activity, is a homolog of the homeobox-containing human proto-oncogene pbx1. Cell. 1993 Sep 24;74(6):1101–1112. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90731-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Regulski M., McGinnis N., Chadwick R., McGinnis W. Developmental and molecular analysis of Deformed; a homeotic gene controlling Drosophila head development. EMBO J. 1987 Mar;6(3):767–777. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1987.tb04819.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Rubin G. M., Yandell M. D., Wortman J. R., Gabor Miklos G. L., Nelson C. R., Hariharan I. K., Fortini M. E., Li P. W., Apweiler R., Fleischmann W. Comparative genomics of the eukaryotes. Science. 2000 Mar 24;287(5461):2204–2215. doi: 10.1126/science.287.5461.2204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Ryoo H. D., Marty T., Casares F., Affolter M., Mann R. S. Regulation of Hox target genes by a DNA bound Homothorax/Hox/Extradenticle complex. Development. 1999 Nov;126(22):5137–5148. doi: 10.1242/dev.126.22.5137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Schöck F., Purnell B. A., Wimmer E. A., Jäckle H. Common and diverged functions of the Drosophila gene pair D-Sp1 and buttonhead. Mech Dev. 1999 Dec;89(1-2):125–132. doi: 10.1016/s0925-4773(99)00215-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Schöck F., Reischl J., Wimmer E., Taubert H., Purnell B. A., Jäckle H. Phenotypic suppression of empty spiracles is prevented by buttonhead. Nature. 2000 May 18;405(6784):351–354. doi: 10.1038/35012620. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Scott M. P., Weiner A. J. Structural relationships among genes that control development: sequence homology between the Antennapedia, Ultrabithorax, and fushi tarazu loci of Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 Jul;81(13):4115–4119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.13.4115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Steller H., Fischbach K. F., Rubin G. M. Disconnected: a locus required for neuronal pathway formation in the visual system of Drosophila. Cell. 1987 Sep 25;50(7):1139–1153. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90180-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Surdej P., Got C., Miassod R. Developmental expression pattern of a 800 kb DNA continuum cloned from the Drosophila X chromosome 14B-15B region. Biol Cell. 1990;68(2):105–118. doi: 10.1016/0248-4900(90)90295-e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Tautz D., Pfeifle C. A non-radioactive in situ hybridization method for the localization of specific RNAs in Drosophila embryos reveals translational control of the segmentation gene hunchback. Chromosoma. 1989 Aug;98(2):81–85. doi: 10.1007/BF00291041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Tseng H., Green H. Association of basonuclin with ability of keratinocytes to multiply and with absence of terminal differentiation. J Cell Biol. 1994 Jul;126(2):495–506. doi: 10.1083/jcb.126.2.495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Tseng H., Green H. Basonuclin: a keratinocyte protein with multiple paired zinc fingers. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Nov 1;89(21):10311–10315. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.21.10311. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Walter J., Dever C. A., Biggin M. D. Two homeo domain proteins bind with similar specificity to a wide range of DNA sites in Drosophila embryos. Genes Dev. 1994 Jul 15;8(14):1678–1692. doi: 10.1101/gad.8.14.1678. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Wiellette E. L., McGinnis W. Hox genes differentially regulate Serrate to generate segment-specific structures. Development. 1999 May;126(9):1985–1995. doi: 10.1242/dev.126.9.1985. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Wimmer E. A., Frommer G., Purnell B. A., Jäckle H. buttonhead and D-Sp1: a novel Drosophila gene pair. Mech Dev. 1996 Sep;59(1):53–62. doi: 10.1016/0925-4773(96)00575-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Wimmer E. A., Jäckle H., Pfeifle C., Cohen S. M. A Drosophila homologue of human Sp1 is a head-specific segmentation gene. Nature. 1993 Dec 16;366(6456):690–694. doi: 10.1038/366690a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Yang Z., Gallicano G. I., Yu Q. C., Fuchs E. An unexpected localization of basonuclin in the centrosome, mitochondria, and acrosome of developing spermatids. J Cell Biol. 1997 May 5;137(3):657–669. doi: 10.1083/jcb.137.3.657. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Zeng C., Pinsonneault J., Gellon G., McGinnis N., McGinnis W. Deformed protein binding sites and cofactor binding sites are required for the function of a small segment-specific regulatory element in Drosophila embryos. EMBO J. 1994 May 15;13(10):2362–2377. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06520.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Zinn K., McAllister L., Goodman C. S. Sequence analysis and neuronal expression of fasciclin I in grasshopper and Drosophila. Cell. 1988 May 20;53(4):577–587. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90574-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES